Scribd
Upload
5 views

Model_Performance_Report

This report evaluates various machine learning models on the Boston Housing dataset using performance metrics such as RMSE, MAPE, and R-squared. It identifies the best-performing model based on these metrics and presents a comparison of actual versus predicted values. The conclusion suggests that further improvements could be made through hyperparameter tuning and feature engineering.

Uploaded by

Karthikeya Chowdary M
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
5 views

Model_Performance_Report

This report evaluates various machine learning models on the Boston Housing dataset using performance metrics such as RMSE, MAPE, and R-squared. It identifies the best-performing model based on these metrics and presents a comparison of actual versus predicted values. The conclusion suggests that further improvements could be made through hyperparameter tuning and feature engineering.

Uploaded by

Karthikeya Chowdary M
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Model Performance Evaluation Report

1. Introduction
This report provides an evaluation of different machine learning models applied to the
Boston Housing dataset. It includes performance metrics such as RMSE, MAPE, and R-
squared to compare models and determine the best-performing one. Additionally, a sample
of actual vs. predicted values is presented.

2. Model Metrics Comparison


Below are the evaluation metrics for the models used in this analysis:

Model RMSE MAPE R-squared

Model 1 [Insert RMSE] [Insert MAPE] [Insert R-squared]

Model 2 [Insert RMSE] [Insert MAPE] [Insert R-squared]

Model 3 [Insert RMSE] [Insert MAPE] [Insert R-squared]

From the table above, we observe that [Insert Model] has the lowest RMSE and highest R-
squared, indicating that it is the best-performing model. The MAPE values suggest that
[Insert Model] provides the most accurate predictions in terms of percentage error.

3. Actual vs. Predicted Values


Below is a sample of the actual vs. predicted values along with their residuals:

Actual Value Predicted Value Residual

[Insert Actual] [Insert Predicted] [Insert Residual]

[Insert Actual] [Insert Predicted] [Insert Residual]

[Insert Actual] [Insert Predicted] [Insert Residual]

[Insert Actual] [Insert Predicted] [Insert Residual]

[Insert Actual] [Insert Predicted] [Insert Residual]

[Insert Actual] [Insert Predicted] [Insert Residual]

[Insert Actual] [Insert Predicted] [Insert Residual]

[Insert Actual] [Insert Predicted] [Insert Residual]

[Insert Actual] [Insert Predicted] [Insert Residual]

[Insert Actual] [Insert Predicted] [Insert Residual]


4. Conclusion
Based on the analysis, [Insert Model] is the most effective model for predicting Boston
Housing prices. Further improvements could be explored through hyperparameter tuning
and feature engineering.

You might also like