Eco Summary Sheet
Eco Summary Sheet
Change in both supply and demand: Price elasticity allows us to compare the responsiveness to price
Suppose there is a combination – bushfires and hot weather. Both changes of goods that are measured with different units of
lead to higher PE but QE is not clear on how it changes. measurement.
Example
As price of milk increases from $1 to $3 per litre, demand of
milk decrease from 7 to 3 litres.
As price of cereal increases from $1 to $3 per kg, demand of
cereals decrease from 3 to 1 kg.
Milk:
Q 2−Q 1 −4
% change in Q: = =−80 %
(Q 2+Q 1) ÷ 2 5
All cases: Percentage change in price:
P 2−P 1 2
= =1=100 %
( P 2+ P 1)÷ 2 2
−80 %
Elasticity: =−0.8
100 %
Cereals:
Percentage change in quantity:
Q 2−Q 1 −2
= =1=−100 %
(Q 2+Q 1) ÷ 2 2
Free markets and the role of prices: Percentage change in price:
Free market: price is allowed to freely adjust P 2−P 1 2
- Prices are a mechanism for allocating scarce resources
= =1=100 %
( P 2+ P 1)÷ 2 2
- The market mechanism of S and D means that any buyer who
−100 %
is willing and able to pay the equilibrium price can purchase Elasticity: =−1
the good 100 %
- Similarly, an seller who is willing and able to produce and sell Hence, the demand for cereals is more price elastic than
the good at the equilibrium price, will do so demand for milk.
Elasticity Price elasticity changes depending on the specific point on the D
Elasticity: measure of how much a variable responds to a change curve that you consider.
in one of its determinants
Price elasticity of demand:
PED = % change in QD/% change in $
- Necessities are income inelastic (i.e. low positive income
elasticity < 1)
- Luxuries are income elastic (i.e. high positive income elasticity
> 1)
Cross price elasticity of demand (CPED):
CPED: how much the QD of one goods responds to a change in the
price of a related good
CPED = % change QD of good 1/% change in $ of good 2
Complements have negative cross price elasticity
Substitutes have positive cross price elasticity
Price floors:
Two possible outcomes:
1. If floor is below equilibrium $ (not binding) no effect
2. If floor is above equilibrium $ (binding) surplus
-- Who pays the tax?
Taxes and market outcomes
- Market (sellers) $ falls from $3 to $2.80
Tax on sellers:
- What price do buyers pay?
Government passes a law requiring sellers of ice-cream to send
o $2.80 + $0.50 = $3.30
$0.50 to the gov. for each unit sold.
Tax makes both buyers and sellers worse off – share the burden. In
For sellers, tax is an additional production cost. At any given
the new equilibrium, buyers pay more for the good and sellers
quantity, sellers require $ to be $0.50 to cover extra cost of tax.
receive less.
- Supply curve shifts up by amount equal to tac
- New equilibrium is at point B ( equilibrium and $)
Impact of taxes:
In the new equilibrium, quantity traded is regardless whom the
tax is levied on
-- Who pays the tax? - Taxes discourage market activity
- Market $ from $3 to $3.30 - However, necessary to raise revenue to finance projects and
- What $ do sellers receive? services
o $3.30 - $0.50 = $2.80 Buyers pay more, sellers receive less, regardless of whom the tax is
The tax makes both buyers and sellers worse off. levied on.
In the new equilibrium buyers pay more for the good and sellers Elasticity and tax incidence:
receive less. Tax incidence: what proportions is the burden of tax divided
between buyers and sellers
- Burden of tax falls more heavily on the side of the market
that is less elastic
To identiy $ buyers pay and sellers sell, don’t shift D or S – take two Topic 5: Consumers, producers and efficiency of
points whose distance is exactly equal to size of tax.
markets
Welfare economics: study of how the allocation of resources
affects economic wellbeing
Welfare of market participants is measured using participants’
surplus – consumer surplus (CS) and producer surplus (PS)
Consumer surplus
Willingness to pay (WTP): maximum amount a buyer is willing to
pay for a good
Consider the case in which D is less elastic than S. The burden falls - Measure (in $) of the value of the good to the buyer
more heavily on consumers. - Subjective measure – depends on what the buyer thinks the
good is worth to her
Consumer surplus (CS): buyer’s willingness to pay for a good (i.e.
value to buyer) minus amount buyer actually pays
- Measure of buyer’s benefit from purchasing the good
Example
- Suppose I am willing to pay $13 for a burger and actual price is $10. CS
from buying the burger is $3.
- We have many consumers in the market, each with her own WTP.
- If you know the WTP of each consumer in the market AND the market
price, then you can calculate the CS for each individual consumer. Then by
summing these up, you can find the total CS.
Now consider the case in which S is less elastic than D. The burden
Using the demand curve to measure CS:
falls more heavily on producers.
The market demand curve shows buyers’ WTP.
Suppose there are only 4 buyers, and each buyer is interested in
purchasing only one copy of Pink Floyd’s album.
The willingness to pay of each buyer is:
Impact of subsidies:
Market outcomes are identical if the $1 subsidy is paid to buyers
instead of sellers.
- D curve shifts by $1 but outcomes are identical At any given quantity, the corresponding $ on the D curve (height)
Regardless of whether a subsidy is paid to buyers or sellers, its shows WTP of marginal buyer
effects are the same: - Marginal buyer: the buyer who would leave the market first if
- Quantity traded in equilibrium is higher the $ were any higher
o Subsidies encourage market activity Any given quantity, the corresponding $ on D curve shows the
o However are costly value of the last unit of the good that was bought in the market.
- Buyers pay less and sellers receive more
o Shared benefit regardless of who receives the subsidy
o Subsidy incidence: less elastic side of market receives
larger part of benefit
can sell the burger at a price of $10.
- Your producer surplus from selling a burger is $10-$8=$2.
- Your WTS a burger is your cost of producing the burger, $8 (at a price below
$8 you would make a loss).
We have many sellers in the market, each with his own cost and WTS. If you know
the costs of each seller in the market AND the market price, then you can
calculate the PS of each individual seller. Then by summing these up, you can find
the total PS.
At any given quantity, the $ given by the S curve shows the cost of
the last unit produced.
Producer surplus
Producer surplus (PS): amount a seller is actually paid minus the
seller’s cost
- Measure (in $) of the benefit a producer receives from selling
the good
- Willingness to sell (WTS): lowest $ a seller would accept for
providing his good/service
Example
Suppose you sell burgers. Suppose it costs you $8 to produce a burger and you
How to judge market outcomes:
We address this issue in the following way:
1. We consider the level of society’s welfare associated to a
market outcome
2. We then ask whether a benevolent and all-knowing social
planner would leave the market outcome as it is or change it
in order to increase welfare
Market efficiency
Market-outcome/resource-allocation that maximises TS is efficient
– good should be produced by those with lowest cost of
Supply curve tells two things: production and consumed by the buyers who value it the most.
1. Given a price – shows quantity that sellers are willing and Evaluating market equilibrium:
able to sell
Market outcome equilibrium price Pe and equilibrium quantity
2. Given a quantity – shows the sellers’ cost to produce the last
unit of the good Qe.
Suppose the market $ for painting a house is $3,200. What is the - Is the outcome sufficient? – does the market generate the
total PS? largest TS possible given D and S curves?
- CEF: increase in PS due to new sales (Q 2−Q 1 ) as either marginal buyer is < cost to marginal seller.
- Decreasing Q produced and consumed TS
new producers enter the market and/or existing producers
- Continues to be true until Q reaches equilibrium level
decide to sell more
Examples of externalities
Negative Positive
Air pollution: suffered by bystanders Increase in productivity: enjoyed by a
from industries burning fossil fuels bystander from research and
development done by other firms
Climate change: suffered by Not catching a virus: enjoyed by a
bystanders because of industries bystanders from nearby people being
emitting greenhouse gases vaccinated
Catching a virus: suffered by Increased business activity: enjoyed by
bystanders from sick nearby people a bystander from locally restored
violating a pandemic lockdown historic buildings
Passive smoking: suffered by Higher productivity: enjoyed by a
bystanders from smokers around bystander from an educated workforce
them around them
Negative externalities:
Consider market for aluminium and assume that factories pollute: - Internalising the externality: Altering incentives so that
- For each unit produced, certain amount of pollution enters buyers/sellers consider all the effects of their actions.
the atmosphere - Solution: introduce a tax on each unit of aluminium traded
This is a negative externality: (i.e. a per unit tax on aluminium).
- Pollution creates health problems The graph shows the case in which the tax is levied on sellers.
- For each unit of aluminium produced, the “true” cost to - If the size of the tax is equal to the cost of pollution, the
society is the private cost to aluminium producers + cost to supply curve shifts up to the Social Cost curve.
bystanders whose health is negatively affected by pollution New market equilibrium after the tax will be at point A and the
The “true” cost to society is called the social cost efficient quantity will be produced.
- Larger than private cost by amount = to cost of negative - NOTE: a tax levied on buyers would work as well
externality (red curve)