Models of Communication
Models of Communication
We communicate with one another, so we all understand how communication takes place, right?
In a way, as the US communication theorist Harold D. Lasswell said, the theorists’ task is to answer
the question “Who says what to whom with what effect?”.
● Introduce you to the models of communication that are most frequently encountered in the
literature,
● Dive deep into major models of communication and explain them in detail.
Table of Contents
● Wrapping up: Communication models help us solve our workplace communication problems
In other words, models of communication provide us with a visual representation of the different
aspects of a communication situation.
Since communication is a complex process, it’s often challenging to determine where a conversation
begins and ends.
Some models are more detailed than others, but even the most elaborate ones cannot perfectly
represent what goes on in a communication encounter.
Since communication is the lifeblood of any organization, we have to strive to understand how it
works.
Do you remember the last time you had a misunderstanding with a colleague?
Or, maybe the email you had sent to your coworker ended up in the spam folder, so they didn’t even
get it?
Whatever the misunderstanding was, we have to come to terms with the fact that some
communication encounters are successful, others not so much.
That is why we have so many current communication models we can utilize to plan successful
communication situations.
Now that we have seen what communication models are and why they are important for our
workplace communication, it is time we take a closer look at the 8 models of communication.
There are 8 major models of communication, which can be divided into 3 categories:
1. Linear models of communication — They only look at one-way communication. The most
prominent linear models of communication are:
1. Aristotle’s communication model,
In the following paragraphs, we will analyze each of these models in detail, starting with linear
models.
The linear communication model is straightforward and used mainly in marketing, sales, and PR, in
communication with customers.
Linear communication models suggest that communication takes place only in one direction.
● The channel,
● The receiver.
Some linear models of communication also mention noise as one of the factors that have a role in
the communication process. Noise acts as the added (background) element that usually distracts
from the original message.
But, we’ll talk more about the role of noise in the communication process later on. For now, let’s
start with the basic elements of the linear communication model.
As illustrated in the linear communication model diagram below, this communication model is pretty
straightforward.
Linear communication model diagram
The channel, as the medium, changes the message into speech, writing, or animation.
The message then finally reaches the receiver, who decodes it.
We already mentioned the 3 most prominent linear models of communication, and now it is time to
analyze each one of them in more detail.
The oldest communication model that dates back to 300 BC, Aristotle’s model was designed to
examine how to become a better and more persuasive communicator.
Aristotle’s model of communication primarily focuses on the sender (public speaker, professor, etc.)
who passes on their message to the receiver (the audience).
The sender is also the only active member in this model, whereas the audience is passive. This makes
Aristotle’s communication model a foolproof way to excel in public speaking, seminars, and lectures.
1. Ethos — Defines the credibility of the speaker. Speaker gains credibility, authority, and power
by being an expert in a field of their choice.
2. Pathos — Connects the speaker with the audience through different emotions (anger,
sadness, happiness, etc.)
3. Logos — Signifies logic. Namely, it is not enough for the speech to be interesting — it needs
to follow the rules of logic.
As shown in Aristotle’s communication model diagram below, Aristotle also suggested that we look at
5 components of a communication situation to analyze the best way to communicate:
● Speaker,
● Speech,
● Occasion,
● Effect.
Picture this:
She delivers her speech persuasively, in a manner that leaves her students mesmerized.
The professor is at the center of attention, whereas her audience — her students — are merely
passive listeners. Nevertheless, her message influences them and makes them act accordingly.
So, in this situation, professor Hustvedt is the speaker, and her lecture on disorders is the act of
speech.
The occasion in question is a university lecture, while the students are her target audience.
The effect of her speech is the students gaining knowledge on this subject matter.
One of the major drawbacks of this model is that it does not pay attention to the feedback in
communication because the audience is passive.
Lasswell’s communication model views communication as the transmission of a message with the
effect as the result.
The effect in this case is the measurable and obvious change in the receiver of the message that is
caused by the elements of communication.
Lasswell’s model aims to answer the following 5 questions regarding its elements:
The answers to these questions offer us the main components of this model:
● Communicator,
● Message,
● Medium,
● Audience/Receiver, and
● Effect.
If we take a look at Lasswell’s communication model diagram below, we can get a better
understanding of how these main components are organized.
Lasswell’s communication model diagram
Let’s say you are watching an infomercial channel on TV and on comes a suitcase salesman, Mr.
Sanders.
He is promoting his brand of suitcases as the best. Aware that millions of viewers are watching his
presentation, Mr. Sanders is determined to leave a remarkable impression.
By doing so, he is achieving brand awareness, promoting his product as the best on the market, and
consequently increasing sales revenue.
The message he is conveying is the promotion of his brand of suitcases as the best.
The effect he is achieving by doing this is raising brand awareness and increasing sales revenue.
Strangely enough, Shannon and Weaver were mathematicians, who developed their work during the
Second World War in the Bell Telephone Laboratories. They aimed to discover which channels are
most effective for communicating.
So, although they were doing research as part of their engineering endeavors, they claimed that their
theory is applicable to human communication as well.
As the Shanon-Weaver communication model diagram below shows, the main components of this
model are:
● Sender,
● Encoder,
● Channel,
● Decoder, and
● Receiver.
Shannon and Weaver were also the first to introduce the role of noise in the communication process.
In his book Introduction to Communication Studies, John Fiske defines noise as:
“Anything that is added to the signal between its transmission and reception that is not intended by
the source.”
The noise appears in the form of mishearing a conversation, misspelling an email, or static on a radio
broadcast.
Unfortunately, while she was speaking, her assistant Peter interrupted her, and she forgot to tell
Julian about the most important issue.
At the end of the week, Julian did finish the report, but there were some mistakes, which had to be
corrected later on.
Julian’s ears and brain were decoders, and Julian was the receiver.
The trouble in this process was the lack of feedback. Had Julian asked Paula for clarification after
Peter interrupted her, the whole communication process would have been more effective, and there
would have been no mistakes.
Since the original version didn’t include it, the principle of feedback was added to the updated
version, so the model provided a more truthful representation of human interaction.
The concept of feedback was derived from the studies of Norbert Wiener, the so-called father of
cybernetics.
Simply put, feedback is the transfer of the receiver’s reaction back to the sender.
It allows the speaker to modify their performance according to the reaction of the audience.
Maybe the most important function of feedback is the fact that it helps the receiver feel involved in
the communication process.
That makes the receiver more receptive to the message because they feel their opinion is being
taken into account.
This communication model is unique in the sense that it gives a detailed account of the key elements
in each step.
Simply put, Berlo’s S-M-C-R communication model is a linear model of communication that suggests
communication is the transfer of information between 4 basic steps or key elements.
What are the main elements of Berlo’s Berlo’s S-M-C-R communication model?
As shown in Berlo’s S-M-C-R communication model diagram below, these steps are the following:
1. Source,
2. Message,
3. Channel, and
4. Receiver.
Let’s consider the key elements that affect how well the message is communicated, starting with the
source.
The source or the sender carefully puts their thoughts into words and transfers the message to the
receiver.
So, how does the sender transfer the information to the receiver according to Berlo’s S-M-C-R
communication model?
● Communication skills — First and foremost, the source needs good communication skills to
ensure the communication will be effective. The speaker should know when to pause, what
to repeat, how to pronounce a word, etc.
● Attitude — Secondly, the source needs the right attitude. Without it, not even a great
speaker would ever emerge as a winner. The source needs to make a lasting impression on
the receiver(s).
● Knowledge — Here, knowledge does not refer to educational qualifications but to the clarity
of the information that the source wants to transfer to the receiver.
● Social system — The source should be familiar with the social system in which the
communication process takes place. That would help the source not to offend anyone.
● Culture — Last but not least, to achieve effective communication, the source needs to be
acquainted with the culture in which the communication encounter is taking place. This is
especially important for cross-cultural communication.
The speaker creates the message when they transform their thoughts into words.
● Elements — Speech alone is not enough for the message to be fully understood. That is why
other elements have to be taken into account: gestures, body language, facial expressions,
etc.
● Treatment — The way the source treats the message. They have to be aware of the
importance of the message so that they can convey it appropriately.
● Structure — The source has to properly structure the message to ensure the receiver will
understand it correctly.
● Code — All the elements, verbal and nonverbal, need to be accurate if you do not want your
message to get distorted and misinterpreted.
To get from the source to the receiver, the message goes through the channel.
Berlo’s S-M-C-R communication model identifies all our senses are the channels that help us
communicate with one another.
Our sense of hearing lets us know that someone is speaking to us.
Through our sense of taste, we gather information about the spiciness of a sauce we are eating.
A receiver is a person the source is speaking to — the destination of the conveyed message.
To understand the message, the receiver should involve the same elements as the source. They
should have similar communication skills, attitudes, and knowledge, and be acquainted with the
social system and culture in which they communicate.
Watching the news on television is the perfect example of Berlo’s S-M-C-R Model of communication.
In this case, the news presenter is the source of the news and they convey the message to the
audience.
The news is the message, the television is the channel, and the audience are the receivers of the
message.
Now that we have become acquainted with linear models of communication, it is time we move on
to something a little more complex and dynamic — interactive models of communication.
Interactive models are used in internet-based and mediated communication such as telephone
conversations, letters, etc.
As more dynamic models, interactive communication models refer to two-way communication with
feedback.
However, feedback within interactive communication models is not simultaneous, but rather slow
and indirect.
The main elements of these models, illustrated in the interactive communication model diagram,
include the following:
● Sender,
● Message,
● Receiver,
● Feedback, and
● Field of experience.
You probably noticed the new, previously not seen element — field of experience.
The field of experience represents a person’s culture, past experiences, and personal history.
All of these factors influence how the sender constructs a message, as well as how the receiver
interprets it. Every one of us brings a unique field of experience into communication situations.
In their book Communication Models for the Study of Mass Communications, Denis Mcquail and Sven
Windahl say that the emergence of this model “meant a clear break with the traditional
linear/one-way picture of communication.”
As such, this model is useful for describing synchronous, interpersonal communication, but less
suitable for cases with little or no feedback.
Furthermore, the Osgood-Schramm communication model shows that information is of no use until
it is put into words and conveyed to other people.
What are the main principles and steps in the communication process according to this model?
2. Communication is equal and reciprocal. — Both parties are equally engaged as encoders and
decoders.
● Encoding,
● Decoding, and
● Interpreting.
Imagine you have not heard from your college friend for 15 years. Suddenly, they call you, and you
start updating each other about what happened during the time you have not seen each other.
In this example, you and your friend are equally encoding and decoding messages, and your
communication is synchronous. You are both interpreting each other’s messages.
The next interactive communication model on our list is the Westley and Maclean model of
communication.
The Westley and Maclean communication model suggests that the communication process does
not start with the source/sender, but rather with environmental factors.
This model also takes into account the object of the orientation (background, culture, and beliefs) of
the sender and the receiver of messages.
The very process of communication, according to this communication model, starts with
environmental factors that influence the speaker — the culture or society the speaker lives in,
whether the speaker is in a public or private space, etc.
What are the main elements of the Westley and Maclean communication model?
1. Environment (X),
3. Source/Sender (A),
5. Receiver (B),
7. Feedback (F),
9. Opinion leaders.
The Westley and Maclean communication model diagram below shows how these components are
organized in the communication process.
The Westley and Maclean communication model diagram
Imagine that on your way to the office, you witness a road accident.
This is the type of stimulus that would nudge you to call your friends and tell them about what you
had seen, or call your boss to say you are going to be a bit late.
So, the communication process in this example does not start with you, but with the road accident
you have witnessed.
Now that we have seen what the elements of communication in this model are, let’s look at all of
them in greater detail.
As mentioned above, this model shows that the communication process does not start from the
sender of the message, but rather from the environment.
According to the Westley and Maclean Model, the communication process starts when a stimulus
from the environment motivates a person to create and send a message.
When the sender of the message experiences something in their environment that nudges them to
send the message, then that sensory experience becomes an element of communication.
In the example above, the sensory experience would be witnessing a road accident.
In the above-mentioned example, you are the sender, as well as a participant in the interpersonal
communication situation.
However, a sender can also be a newscaster sending a message to millions of viewers. In that case,
we are talking about mass communication.
The next element of communication in this model is the object of the orientation of the source.
Namely, the object of the orientation of the source is the sender’s beliefs or experiences.
If we take the previously-mentioned road accident as an example, you (A) are concerned (X²) that
you are going to be late for work because of the accident (X¹), and that is why you are calling your
boss (B).
The receiver is the person who receives the message from the sender.
In mass communication, a receiver is a person who watches TV, reads a newspaper, etc.
When speaking about interpersonal communication, a receiver is a person who listens to the
message.
In the example of a road accident, mentioned above, the receivers of the message are your friends
and your boss.
The object of orientation of the receiver is the receiver’s beliefs or experiences, which influence how
the message is received.
For example, your friend (B) watching the news is worried about your safety (X³) after receiving the
message.
Feedback is crucial for this model because it makes this model circular, rather than linear.
That means that a receiver and a gatekeeper are sending messages back to the sender.
After they have received the feedback, the sender modifies the message and sends it back.
So, you have witnessed the accident and feel the urge to call your best friend.
In this example, after the feedback from your worried friend, you modify your message and send it
back to them.
This element usually occurs in mass communication, rather than in interpersonal communication.
Gatekeepers are editors of the messages senders are trying to communicate to receivers.
For example, these are newspaper editors who edit the message before it reaches the readers.
Namely, opinion leaders have an immense influence as an environmental factor (X) on the sender of
the message (A).
Now that we are familiar with interactive models, all we have left to analyze are the transactional
communication models.
Transactional models are the most dynamic communication models, which first introduce a new
term for senders and receivers — communicators.
Aside from that, transactional models show that we do not just exchange information during our
interactions, but create relationships, form cross-cultural bonds, and shape our opinions.
● Social,
● Relational, and
● Cultural contexts.
Moreover, these models acknowledge that there are barriers to effective communication — noise.
If we take a look at the transactional communication model diagram below, we can identify the key
components of this communication model:
● Encoding,
● Decoding,
● Communicators,
● The message,
● Noise.
We have already mentioned the most prominent transactional models of communication, and now it
is time to thoroughly analyze them.
The sender and the receiver change their places and are equally important. Feedback from the
sender is the reply for the receiver, and both communicators provide feedback.
At the same time, both sender and receiver are responsible for the communication’s effect and
effectiveness.
What are the main elements of Barnlund’s communication model?
Barnlund’s transactional communication model diagram below illustrates the following main
components of this communication model:
● Encoding,
● Decoding,
● Communicators,
● The channel.
All these cues, as well as the environment and noise, are part of the message. Each communicator’s
reaction depends on their background, experiences, attitudes, and beliefs.
● Face-to-face interactions,
● Chat sessions,
● Telephone conversations,
● Meetings, etc.
Let’s illustrate this model with an example from a business messaging app Pumble.
An example that shows a misunderstanding due to the cultural differences in celebrating certain
holidays (Pumble business messaging app)
Why was there a misunderstanding in this conversation even though everything seemed fine at first
glance?
Namely, Catherine had thought that Irene wanted a day off on July 4th.
However, Irene comes from Canada and celebrates Independence Day on July 1st.
On that day, she does not show up at work to Catherine’s bewilderment, because she has expected
Irene to take a day off on July 4th, on US Independence Day.
Still, this misunderstanding could have easily been avoided, had they cleared up the dates by
providing each other with feedback.
Therefore, each communication encounter is different from the previous one because
communication never repeats itself.
What is Dance’s Helical communication model?
Dance’s Helical communication model views communication as a circular process that gets more and
more complex as communication progresses.
That is why it is represented by a helical spiral in the Dance’s Helical communication model diagram
below.
In their book Communication: Principles for a Lifetime, Steven A. Beebe, Susan J. Beebe, and Diana K.
Ivy state:
“Interpersonal communication is irreversible. Like the spiral shown here, communication never loops
back on itself. Once it begins, it expands infinitely as the communication partners contribute their
thoughts and experiences to the exchange.”
According to this communication model, in the communication process, the feedback we get from
the other party involved influences our next statement and we become more knowledgeable with
every new cycle.
Dance himself explained his model with the example of a person learning throughout their life.
Namely, a person starts to communicate with their surroundings very early on, using rudimentary
methods of communication.
For instance, as babies, we cry to get our mothers’ attention. Later on, we learn to speak in words,
and then in full sentences.
During the whole process, we build on what we know to improve our communication.
Every communication act is, therefore, a chance for us to learn how to communicate more effectively
in the future, and feedback helps us achieve more effective communication.
In a way, our whole life is one communicational journey toward the top of Dance’s helix.
Wrapping up: Communication models help us solve our workplace communication problems
Communication in real life might be too complex to be truly represented by communication models.
However, models of communication can still help us examine the steps in the process of
communication, so we can better understand how we communicate both in the workplace and
outside of it.
In this guide, we have covered the most important models of communication, divided into 3
categories:
● Linear models — Mainly used in marketing, sales, and PR, in communication with customers,
these models view communication as a one-way process.
● Transactional models — The most complex models of communication, which best reflect the
communication process.
Although none of these models represent our communication 100%, they can help us detect and
solve potential problems and improve our communication skills.