0% found this document useful (0 votes)
13 views1 page

System Analysis and Design Presentation Criteria

The document outlines the criteria for evaluating a system analysis and design presentation, divided into four main sections: Requirements Analysis, Design and Functionality, System Architecture, and Presentation and Delivery. Each section includes specific evaluation items with a percentage weight and focuses on aspects such as clarity, usability, scalability, and effective communication. The document also provides space for group information, scores, and remarks.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
13 views1 page

System Analysis and Design Presentation Criteria

The document outlines the criteria for evaluating a system analysis and design presentation, divided into four main sections: Requirements Analysis, Design and Functionality, System Architecture, and Presentation and Delivery. Each section includes specific evaluation items with a percentage weight and focuses on aspects such as clarity, usability, scalability, and effective communication. The document also provides space for group information, scores, and remarks.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

System Analysis and Design Presentation Criteria

Section : ______________________ Group No. : __________________


Project Manager : ______________________
Member (1) : ______________________ Member (4) : __________________
Member (2) : ______________________ Member (5) : __________________
Member (3) : ______________________ Member (6) : __________________

Criteria Item Description Scores Remarks/ Comments


1. Requirements Analysis (30%) • Clarity and Completeness: Were the system requirements clearly defined and well-
documented?

• Feasibility: Are the requirements realistic given the constraints (e.g., technology)?

• Understanding of User Needs: Does the design address the user's requirements
effectively?
2. Design and Functionality (30%) • Innovation and Creativity: Does the design introduce novel solutions or ideas?

• Usability: Is the system user-friendly and intuitive?

• Completeness: Are all specified features and functionalities implemented?

• Security: Does the design adequately address security concerns?

3. System Architecture (20%) • Scalability: Is the system designed to handle growth in users or data?

• Performance: Does the architecture support efficient performance under expected


workloads?

• Fault Tolerance and Reliability: Does the design handle errors gracefully and ensure
system reliability?
4. Presentation and Delivery (20%) • Clarity and Organization: Is the system and design explained clearly and logically?
• Visualization and Prototypes: Are diagrams, mockups, or prototypes included to
demonstrate the design?
• Engagement: Did the team effectively communicate the benefits and limitations of their
design?

TOTAL SCORES ___________

You might also like