Lab Report 2023
Lab Report 2023
Kali Taitano
1. Introduction:
Chemical kinetics is a branch of chemistry that focuses on the rate of chemical reactions.
The importance of this study is integral to many professional fields from pharmaceuticals to
cooking. The rate at which a chemical reaction takes place influences so much of our daily life;
for example, we can look at a pharmaceutical professional using chemical kinetics to determine
how quickly a drug will affect and aid a patient. The effectiveness and efficiency of this reaction
can be described through rates and rate laws. The rate of a reaction is simply defined as the
concentration of a substance that is used over a certain amount of time [1]. A rate law is an
equation that scientists can use to compare the concentrations of each reactant and how they will
affect the rate of the reaction. A typical rate law is written as following formula: rate =
k[A]m[B]n[C]p. The exponents are substituted with the order the reaction is with respect to A, B,
or C. The order of the reaction with respect to each reactant tells us how the rate will change
when the concentration of a certain reactant is altered. This experiment will allow us to find the
rate order in the reaction between HCl, acetone, I2, and deionized water.
2. Experimental Methods:
In preparation for the multiple trials of this experiment, 100mL of hydrochloric acid
(HCl), acetone, iodine (I2), and deionized water are gathered in 150mL beakers. A 250mL
beaker, a graduated cylinder, a stopwatch or phone for timing, gloves, and recording materials
are brought to the station where the experiment will be conducted. The appropriate amount of
HCl, acetone, and deionized water as seen in Table 1 are measured out and poured in the 250mL
beaker.
stopwatch is started immediately after the I2 is added. The solution is not stirred or agitated in
any fashion. The color of the solution is observed until it is completely colorless and transparent.
The stopwatch is then stopped, and the time is recorded in seconds. Each of the steps is repeated
until all 4 trials have been completed once. After each trial has been completed, the experiment is
repeated once more or until all trials are within 20 seconds of each other to collect more data.
The waste from each trial is poured into a waste bucket placed in a waste hood.
3. Results:
This section is broken down into subsections to better organize all the data and math that
was collected and completed. Tables and figures are used to visualize most of the data and math.
3.2 Finding the concentrations of each reactant before the reaction starts.
The following equation was used to find the concentrations shown in bold in the last
M1V1 = M2V2
M2 = M1V1 / V2
M2 = 0.0010 M I2
The concentration of iodine will be divided by the average amount of time each trial took
3.4 Finding the order of each trial with respect to each reactant.
The following equation will be used to determine the order of each reactant (m, n, and p).
Trial 1 will always be used as the denominator in this equation; each subsequent trial will be
rate 2 m n
=k [ acetone ] [ HCl ] ¿ ¿
rate 1
−6
1.68 x 10 m n
−6
=k [ acetone ] [ HCl ] ¿ ¿
1.29 x 10
−6
1.68 x 10
−6
=¿ ¿
1.29 x 10
p
1.30=2
log (1.30)
=p
log (2)
p=.4 ≈ 0
Each variable is solved for, and the resulting orders are revealed:
m = 1st order
n = 1st order
p = 0th order
3.5 Finding the rate constant of each trial and average rate constant among the trials.
To find k in each trial we will simply plug in all the known values from each trial and
solve for k.
1 1
1.29 x 10−6=k [ 0.8 ] [ 0.2 ] ¿
−6
k trial1=8.06 x 10
Solving for each k value you are left with the following:
−6
k trial1=8.06 x 10
−5
k trial2=1.05 x 10
−6
k trial3=6.41 x 10
−6
k trial 4=8.25 x 10
Finally, taking an average of the rate constants we are left with the following:
−6
k avg=8.30 x 10
Our results from experimentation led us to believe that the rate order of the reaction was
1st order with respect to acetone and HCl and 0th order to I2. This makes sense as we see drastic
decreases in average time for the reaction to reach completion in trials 3 and 4 when there is a
higher concentration of acetone (trial 3) and HCl (trial 4). Since the reaction is 1 st order with
respect to both of these reactants, we can mathematically predict that any change in
concentration will affect the rate at a proportional amount to the change in concentration of either
of these reactants. The concentration of I2 will not affect the rate of the reaction since the reaction
is 0th order with respect to I2. The results were surprising to me as I expected I2 to make the
biggest difference in the rate of the reaction when in reality it had little to no effect at all.
Though our experiment yielded results that brought us to an answer similar to other
groups, there is significant error in our data that have me skeptical of the validity of our
conclusion. Firstly, we did not finish all of our trials which can lead to a skewed average time per
reaction in the equation used in section 3.3. Another error was our inability to replicate a trial
time that was within 20 seconds of the previous attempt. This was our biggest error in the
experimentation process and definitely skewed the math that led us to the reaction rate or each
trial.
5. References: