Riscvscisk
Riscvscisk
Differences
RISC Architecture
1/10
This is a small or reduced set of instructions. Here, every instruction is
expected to attain very small jobs. In this machine, the instruction sets are
modest and simple, which help in comprising more complex commands.
Each instruction is about a similar length; these are wound together to get
compound tasks done in a single operation. Most commands are
completed in one machine cycle. This pipelining is a crucial technique
used to speed up RISC machines.
Also, while writing a program, RISC makes it easier by letting the computer
programmer eliminate needless codes and stops wasting cycles.
Characteristics
2/10
In RISC, Pipelining is easy as the execution of all instructions will be
done in a uniform interval of time i.e. one click.
In RISC, more RAM is required to store assembly-level instructions.
Reduced instructions need a less number of transistors in RISC.
RISC uses the Harvard memory model means it is Harvard
Architecture.
A compiler is used to perform the conversion operation means
converting a high-level language statement into the code of its form.
CISC Architecture
3/10
Instruction Set Architecture is a medium to permit communication
between the programmer and the hardware. Data execution part,
copying of data, deleting, or editing is the user commands used in the
microprocessor, and with this microprocessor, the Instruction set
architecture is operated.
The main keywords used in the above Instruction Set Architecture are
as below
4/10
This underlines the importance of the instruction set architecture. There
are two prevalent instruction set architectures
IBM 370/168 – It was introduced in the year 1970. CISC design is a 32-bit
processor and four 64-bit floating point registers.
VAX 11/780 – CISC design is a 32-bit processor and it supports many
numbers of addressing modes and machine instructions which is from
Digital Equipment Corporation.
Intel 80486 – It was launched in the year 1989 and it is a CISC processor,
which has instructions varying lengths from 1 to 11 and it will have 235
instructions.
Characteristics
5/10
RISC vs CISC
Memory Unit
Program
Design
Calculations
RISC calculations are faster and more precise. CISC calculations are slow
and precise
Decoding
Time
Execution time is very less in RISC. Execution time is very high in CISC.
External memory
6/10
RISC does not require external memory for calculations. CISC requires
external memory for calculations.
Pipelining
RISC Pipelining does function correctly. CISC Pipelining does not function
correctly.
Stalling
Code Expansion
Disc space
SEMANTIC GAP
Semantic Gap
7/10
evolution, the semantic gap grows. To enable efficient compilation of high-
level language programs, CISC and RISC designs are the two options.
If the main memory is divided into areas that are numbered from
row1:column 1 to row 5: column 4. The data is loaded into one of four
registers (A, B, C, or D). To find multiplication of two numbers- One stored
in location 1:3 and other stored in location 4:2 and store back result in 1:3.
8/10
Multiplication of Two Numbers
9/10
The advantages of CISC architecture include the following.
From the above comparison of RISC and CISC, finally, we can conclude
that we cannot distinguish between RISC and CISC technology because
both are apt at their precise application. Today, both RISC and CISC
designers are doing all to get an edge on the competition.
10/10
RISC Vs CISC Architecture : In-Depth Comparative
Analysis
Basis for
Comparison RISC Architecture CISC Architecture
Nearly all the latest CPUs have different architecture designs to work from
“Instruction Set Architecture.” Primarily, there are two types of architectural designs:
These two designs differ in multiple ways. RISC architecture mainly focuses on
executing commands while aiding some microprocessor cycles per command for
optimum performance, while CISC architecture can perform multiple operations
with a single set of instructions.
Also, it has diverse ways of addressing modes to access memory, which depends on
the CPU framework, which requires a single set of instructions to carry out many
low-level actions.
larger
instruction set is uniform. As a result, when a task is executed, RISC preserves the
number of cycles it is carried out by eliminating the code’s unnecessary parts.
Here are some of the advantages of using RISC microprocessors in the CPU design:
CISC processor can quickly execute compound command output with a single
complex set of instructions
It can be used for compilers.
It has a wide range of addressing nodes.
CISC uses multiple data types for its machine hardware and can carry out
processes for a low-level command.
It is complex in nature.
Here are some of the advantages of using CISC microprocessors in the CPU design:
Here is a brief analysis how the RISC vs CISC processor approaches enhance CPU
performance.
In RISC architecture, the number of clock cycles for each instruction is reduced
at the cost of the total instruction per program.
In contrast, in CISC architecture, the number of instructions sets used per
program is reduced, but this increases the overall number of cycles per
instruction.
For Example:
Here, in the task of performing addition, the program is divided into three parts,
i.e., load, operate, and store, which makes RISC programs long and requires more
memory to store instructions while needing fewer transistors as the commands are
simple and less complex.
The task will be carried out with a single instruction or a command, ADD.
Functions only on the Hardwired Control Unit. Functions both on Microprogrammed and
Hardwired Control Unit.
For the usage of more registers, transistors For the storage of complex instructions,
are used. transistors are being used.
Instructions or commands given are fixed in The size of commands or instructions may vary.
size.
Can easily execute Register to Register Can perform operations like REG to REG, REG
Arithmetic Operations. to MEM, and MEM to MEM.
The size of the code used is large. The size of the code used is small.
Instruction can be executed in a single clock More than one clock cycle is required to
cycle. complete a single instruction.
The number of instructions given to execute Many instructions are given to perform the
the task are less compared to CISC and is also task, also known as Complex Instruction Cycle.
known as Reduced Instruction Cycle.
The addressing modes are simple and limited. The addressing modes are complex and large.
Requires heavy usage of RAM storage. Less or efficient usage for RAM storage.
In RISC, for return addresses and procedure For return addresses and procedure
arguments, registers are often used. Also, for arguments, stack is used.
certain processes, memory references can be
avoided.
Machine-level operations are more The implementation programs are well
transparent in RISC designs. Also, certain hidden from the machine-level programs in
instruction sequences are restricted some RISC CISC processors. The clean abstraction
processors restrict for efficiency. between program and its execution is
provided by ISA.
RISC architecture uses split instruction cache The unified cache is used by CISC architecture
and data cache. for data and instructions.
Examples of RISC processors are ARM, DEC The examples for CISC processors are:
Alpha, AMD 29K, ARC, Atmel AVR, Personal computers, Motorola 68K, x86,
PA-RISC, SPARC, Intel i860, Blackfin, PDP-11, and VAX.
SuperH, i960, Power, Motorola 88000,
MIPS, and Power.
Aging legacy systems are mostly developed using RISC architecture, which lacks
flexibility, scalability, and the ability to carry out complex instructions.
The x86 servers have a CISC-based architecture, which ensures they can easily
interact with other solutions and perform complex tasks.
Final Thoughts
RISC (Reduced Instruction Set Computing) and CISC (Complex Instruction Set
Computing).
Here are some examples of legacy systems that are based on RISC architectures:
DEC Alpha
PA-RISC
SPARC
RISC processors provide fast execution with simple individual instruction and
effective pipelining.
5. What are the format ranges for RISC and CISC processors?
RISC processors are often more power-efficient due to their simpler design and
instruction execution, making them popular in mobile and embedded devices.
Due to complex instructions, CISC microprocessors have a smaller code size, while
RISC may require more instructions and thus result in a larger code size for the same
functionality.