Normal distribution

In probability theory and statistics, a normal distribution or Gaussian distribution is

Normal distribution
a type of continuous probability distribution for a real-valued random variable. The
general form of its probability density function is[2][3] Probability density function

The parameter is the mean or expectation of the distribution (and also its median and
mode), while the parameter is the variance. The standard deviation of the
distribution is (sigma). A random variable with a Gaussian distribution is said to be
normally distributed, and is called a normal deviate.

Normal distributions are important in statistics and are often used in the natural and
social sciences to represent real-valued random variables whose distributions are not
known.[4][5] Their importance is partly due to the central limit theorem. It states that,
under some conditions, the average of many samples (observations) of a random The red curve is the standard normal distribution.
variable with finite mean and variance is itself a random variable—whose distribution
converges to a normal distribution as the number of samples increases. Therefore, Cumulative distribution function
physical quantities that are expected to be the sum of many independent processes, such
as measurement errors, often have distributions that are nearly normal.[6]

Moreover, Gaussian distributions have some unique properties that are valuable in
analytic studies. For instance, any linear combination of a fixed collection of
independent normal deviates is a normal deviate. Many results and methods, such as
propagation of uncertainty and least squares[7] parameter fitting, can be derived
analytically in explicit form when the relevant variables are normally distributed.

A normal distribution is sometimes informally called a bell curve.[8] However, many

other distributions are bell-shaped (such as the Cauchy, Student's t, and logistic
distributions). (For other names, see Naming.)

The univariate probability distribution is generalized for vectors in the multivariate Notation
normal distribution and for matrices in the matrix normal distribution. Parameters = mean (location)
= variance (squared scale)

Definitions Support

PDF

Standard normal distribution

CDF
The simplest case of a normal distribution is known as the standard normal
distribution or unit normal distribution. This is a special case when and
, and it is described by this probability density function (or density): Quantile

Mean

Median

Mode
The variable has a mean of 0 and a variance and standard deviation of 1. The density
Variance
has its peak at and inflection points at and .
MAD
Although the density above is most commonly known as the standard normal, a few
authors have used that term to describe other versions of the normal distribution. Carl Skewness
Friedrich Gauss, for example, once defined the standard normal as Excess kurtosis

Entropy

MGF
which has a variance of ⁠ ⁠, and Stephen Stigler[9] once defined the standard normal as
CF

Fisher information

which has a simple functional form and a variance of

General normal distribution
Every normal distribution is a version of the standard normal distribution, whose
domain has been stretched by a factor (the standard deviation) and then translated by Kullback–Leibler
(the mean value): divergence

Expected shortfall

[1]

The probability density must be scaled by so that the integral is still 1.

If is a standard normal deviate, then will have a normal distribution with expected value and standard deviation . This is equivalent
to saying that the standard normal distribution can be scaled/stretched by a factor of and shifted by to yield a different normal distribution, called
. Conversely, if is a normal deviate with parameters and , then this distribution can be re-scaled and shifted via the formula
to convert it to the standard normal distribution. This variate is also called the standardized form of .

Notation
The probability density of the standard Gaussian distribution (standard normal distribution, with zero mean and unit variance) is often denoted with the
Greek letter (phi).[10] The alternative form of the Greek letter phi, , is also used quite often.

The normal distribution is often referred to as or .[11] Thus when a random variable is normally distributed with mean and
standard deviation , one may write

Alternative parameterizations
Some authors advocate using the precision as the parameter defining the width of the distribution, instead of the standard deviation or the variance
. The precision is normally defined as the reciprocal of the variance, .[12] The formula for the distribution then becomes

This choice is claimed to have advantages in numerical computations when is very close to zero, and simplifies formulas in some contexts, such as in
the Bayesian inference of variables with multivariate normal distribution.

Alternatively, the reciprocal of the standard deviation might be defined as the precision, in which case the expression of the normal
distribution becomes

According to Stigler, this formulation is advantageous because of a much simpler and easier-to-remember formula, and simple approximate formulas for
the quantiles of the distribution.

Normal distributions form an exponential family with natural parameters and , and natural statistics x and x2. The dual expectation
parameters for normal distribution are η1 = μ and η2 = μ2 + σ2.

Cumulative distribution function

The cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the standard normal distribution, usually denoted with the capital Greek letter , is the integral

Error function
The related error function gives the probability of a random variable, with normal distribution of mean 0 and variance 1/2 falling in the range
. That is:

These integrals cannot be expressed in terms of elementary functions, and are often said to be special functions. However, many numerical
approximations are known; see below for more.
The two functions are closely related, namely

For a generic normal distribution with density , mean and variance , the cumulative distribution function is

The complement of the standard normal cumulative distribution function, , is often called the Q-function, especially in engineering
texts.[13][14] It gives the probability that the value of a standard normal random variable will exceed : . Other definitions of the -
function, all of which are simple transformations of , are also used occasionally.[15]

The graph of the standard normal cumulative distribution function has 2-fold rotational symmetry around the point (0,1/2); that is,
. Its antiderivative (indefinite integral) can be expressed as follows:

The cumulative distribution function of the standard normal distribution can be expanded by integration by parts into a series:

where denotes the double factorial.

An asymptotic expansion of the cumulative distribution function for large x can also be derived using integration by parts. For more, see Error
function#Asymptotic expansion.[16]

A quick approximation to the standard normal distribution's cumulative distribution function can be found by using a Taylor series approximation:

Recursive computation with Taylor series expansion

The recursive nature of the family of derivatives may be used to easily construct a rapidly converging Taylor series expansion using recursive entries
about any point of known value of the distribution, :

where:

Using the Taylor series and Newton's method for the inverse function
An application for the above Taylor series expansion is to use Newton's method to reverse the computation. That is, if we have a value for the cumulative
distribution function, , but do not know the x needed to obtain the , we can use Newton's method to find x, and use the Taylor series expansion
above to minimize the number of computations. Newton's method is ideal to solve this problem because the first derivative of , which is an integral
of the normal standard distribution, is the normal standard distribution, and is readily available to use in the Newton's method solution.

To solve, select a known approximate solution, , to the desired . may be a value from a distribution table, or an intelligent estimate followed
by a computation of using any desired means to compute. Use this value of and the Taylor series expansion above to minimize computations.

Repeat the following process until the difference between the computed and the desired , which we will call , is below a chosen
acceptably small error, such as 10−5, 10−15, etc.:
where

is the from a Taylor series solution using and

When the repeated computations converge to an error below the chosen acceptably small value, x will be the value needed to obtain a of the
desired value, .

Standard deviation and coverage

About 68% of values drawn from a normal distribution are within one standard deviation σ
from the mean; about 95% of the values lie within two standard deviations; and about 99.7%
are within three standard deviations.[8] This fact is known as the 68–95–99.7 (empirical) rule,
or the 3-sigma rule.

More precisely, the probability that a normal deviate lies in the range between and
is given by

For the normal distribution, the values less than one

standard deviation from the mean account for 68.27% of
To 12 significant digits, the values for are:
the set; while two standard deviations from the mean
account for 95.45%; and three standard deviations
account for 99.73%.

OEIS

1 0.682 689 492 137 0.317 310 507 863 3.151 487 187 53 OEIS: A178647

2 0.954 499 736 104 0.045 500 263 896 21.977 894 5080 OEIS: A110894
3 0.997 300 203 937 0.002 699 796 063 370.398 347 345 OEIS: A270712

4 0.999 936 657 516 0.000 063 342 484 15 787.192 7673

5 0.999 999 426 697 0.000 000 573 303 1 744 277.893 62
6 0.999 999 998 027 0.000 000 001 973 506 797 345.897

For large , one can use the approximation .

Quantile function
The quantile function of a distribution is the inverse of the cumulative distribution function. The quantile function of the standard normal distribution is
called the probit function, and can be expressed in terms of the inverse error function:

For a normal random variable with mean and variance , the quantile function is

The quantile of the standard normal distribution is commonly denoted as . These values are used in hypothesis testing, construction of
confidence intervals and Q–Q plots. A normal random variable will exceed with probability , and will lie outside the interval
with probability . In particular, the quantile is 1.96; therefore a normal random variable will lie outside the interval in only
5% of cases.

The following table gives the quantile such that will lie in the range with a specified probability . These values are useful to determine
tolerance interval for sample averages and other statistical estimators with normal (or asymptotically normal) distributions.[17] The following table
shows , not as defined above.
 0.80 1.281 551 565 545 0.999 3.290 526 731 492

0.90 1.644 853 626 951 0.9999 3.890 591 886 413
0.95 1.959 963 984 540 0.99999 4.417 173 413 469

0.98 2.326 347 874 041 0.999999 4.891 638 475 699

0.99 2.575 829 303 549 0.9999999 5.326 723 886 384
0.995 2.807 033 768 344 0.99999999 5.730 728 868 236

0.998 3.090 232 306 168 0.999999999 6.109 410 204 869

For small , the quantile function has the useful asymptotic expansion

Properties
The normal distribution is the only distribution whose cumulants beyond the first two (i.e., other than the mean and variance) are zero. It is also the
continuous distribution with the maximum entropy for a specified mean and variance.[18][19] Geary has shown, assuming that the mean and variance are
finite, that the normal distribution is the only distribution where the mean and variance calculated from a set of independent draws are independent of
each other.[20][21]

The normal distribution is a subclass of the elliptical distributions. The normal distribution is symmetric about its mean, and is non-zero over the entire
real line. As such it may not be a suitable model for variables that are inherently positive or strongly skewed, such as the weight of a person or the price
of a share. Such variables may be better described by other distributions, such as the log-normal distribution or the Pareto distribution.

The value of the normal density is practically zero when the value lies more than a few standard deviations away from the mean (e.g., a spread of three
standard deviations covers all but 0.27% of the total distribution). Therefore, it may not be an appropriate model when one expects a significant fraction
of outliers—values that lie many standard deviations away from the mean—and least squares and other statistical inference methods that are optimal for
normally distributed variables often become highly unreliable when applied to such data. In those cases, a more heavy-tailed distribution should be
assumed and the appropriate robust statistical inference methods applied.

The Gaussian distribution belongs to the family of stable distributions which are the attractors of sums of independent, identically distributed
distributions whether or not the mean or variance is finite. Except for the Gaussian which is a limiting case, all stable distributions have heavy tails and
infinite variance. It is one of the few distributions that are stable and that have probability density functions that can be expressed analytically, the others
being the Cauchy distribution and the Lévy distribution.

Symmetries and derivatives

The normal distribution with density (mean and variance ) has the following properties:

It is symmetric around the point which is at the same time the mode, the median and the mean of the distribution.[22]
It is unimodal: its first derivative is positive for negative for and zero only at
The area bounded by the curve and the -axis is unity (i.e. equal to one).
Its first derivative is

Its second derivative is

Its density has two inflection points (where the second derivative of is zero and changes sign), located one standard deviation away
from the mean, namely at and [22]

Its density is log-concave.[22]

Its density is infinitely differentiable, indeed supersmooth of order 2.[23]
Furthermore, the density of the standard normal distribution (i.e. and ) also has the following properties:

Its first derivative is

Its second derivative is
More generally, its nth derivative is where is the nth (probabilist) Hermite polynomial.[24]
The probability that a normally distributed variable with known and is in a particular set, can be calculated by using the fact that
the fraction has a standard normal distribution.

Moments
The plain and absolute moments of a variable are the expected values of and , respectively. If the expected value of is zero, these
parameters are called central moments; otherwise, these parameters are called non-central moments. Usually we are interested only in moments with
integer order .
If has a normal distribution, the non-central moments exist and are finite for any whose real part is greater than −1. For any non-negative integer ,
the plain central moments are:[25]

Here denotes the double factorial, that is, the product of all numbers from to 1 that have the same parity as

The central absolute moments coincide with plain moments for all even orders, but are nonzero for odd orders. For any non-negative integer

The last formula is valid also for any non-integer When the mean the plain and absolute moments can be expressed in terms of
confluent hypergeometric functions and [26]

These expressions remain valid even if is not an integer. See also generalized Hermite polynomials.

Order Non-central moment Central moment

The expectation of conditioned on the event that lies in an interval is given by

where and respectively are the density and the cumulative distribution function of . For this is known as the inverse Mills ratio. Note that
above, density of is used instead of standard normal density as in inverse Mills ratio, so here we have instead of .

Fourier transform and characteristic function

The Fourier transform of a normal density with mean and variance is[27]

where is the imaginary unit. If the mean , the first factor is 1, and the Fourier transform is, apart from a constant factor, a normal density on the
frequency domain, with mean 0 and variance . In particular, the standard normal distribution is an eigenfunction of the Fourier transform.

In probability theory, the Fourier transform of the probability distribution of a real-valued random variable is closely connected to the characteristic
function of that variable, which is defined as the expected value of , as a function of the real variable (the frequency parameter of the
Fourier transform). This definition can be analytically extended to a complex-value variable .[28] The relation between both is:

Moment- and cumulant-generating functions

The moment generating function of a real random variable is the expected value of , as a function of the real parameter . For a normal distribution
with density , mean and variance , the moment generating function exists and is equal to
For any ⁠ ⁠, the coefficient of ⁠ ⁠ in the moment generating function (expressed as an exponential power series in ⁠ ⁠) is the normal distribution's
expected value ⁠ ⁠.

The cumulant generating function is the logarithm of the moment generating function, namely

The coefficients of this exponential power series define the cumulants, but because this is a quadratic polynomial in ⁠ ⁠, only the first two cumulants are
nonzero, namely the mean and the variance ⁠ ⁠.

22 1
Some authors prefer to instead work with the characteristic function E[eitX] = eiμt − σ t /2 and ln E[eitX] = iμt − ⁠2 ⁠σ2t2.

Stein operator and class

Within Stein's method the Stein operator and class of a random variable are and the class of all
absolutely continuous functions .

Zero-variance limit
In the limit when tends to zero, the probability density eventually tends to zero at any , but grows without limit if , while its
integral remains equal to 1. Therefore, the normal distribution cannot be defined as an ordinary function when .

However, one can define the normal distribution with zero variance as a generalized function; specifically, as a Dirac delta function translated by the
mean , that is Its cumulative distribution function is then the Heaviside step function translated by the mean , namely

Maximum entropy
Of all probability distributions over the reals with a specified finite mean and finite variance , the normal distribution is the one with
maximum entropy.[29] To see this, let be a continuous random variable with probability density . The entropy of is defined as[30][31][32]

where is understood to be zero whenever . This functional can be maximized, subject to the constraints that the distribution is
properly normalized and has a specified mean and variance, by using variational calculus. A function with three Lagrange multipliers is defined:

At maximum entropy, a small variation about will produce a variation about which is equal to 0:

Since this must hold for any small , the factor multiplying must be zero, and solving for yields:

The Lagrange constraints that is properly normalized and has the specified mean and variance are satisfied if and only if , , and are chosen
so that

The entropy of a normal distribution is equal to

which is independent of the mean .

Other properties
1. If the characteristic function of some random variable is of the form in a neighborhood of zero, where is a
polynomial, then the Marcinkiewicz theorem (named after Józef Marcinkiewicz) asserts that can be at most a quadratic polynomial,
 and therefore is a normal random variable.[33] The consequence of this result is that the normal distribution is the only distribution
with a finite number (two) of non-zero cumulants.
2. If and are jointly normal and uncorrelated, then they are independent. The requirement that and should be jointly normal is
essential; without it the property does not hold.[34][35][proof] For non-normal random variables uncorrelatedness does not imply
independence.
3. The Kullback–Leibler divergence of one normal distribution from another is given by:[36]

The Hellinger distance between the same distributions is equal to

4. The Fisher information matrix for a normal distribution w.r.t. and is diagonal and takes the form

5. The conjugate prior of the mean of a normal distribution is another normal distribution.[37] Specifically, if are iid
and the prior is , then the posterior distribution for the estimator of will be

6. The family of normal distributions not only forms an exponential family (EF), but in fact forms a natural exponential family (NEF) with
quadratic variance function (NEF-QVF). Many properties of normal distributions generalize to properties of NEF-QVF distributions, NEF
distributions, or EF distributions generally. NEF-QVF distributions comprises 6 families, including Poisson, Gamma, binomial, and
negative binomial distributions, while many of the common families studied in probability and statistics are NEF or EF.
7. In information geometry, the family of normal distributions forms a statistical manifold with constant curvature . The same family is
flat with respect to the (±1)-connections and .[38]
8. If are distributed according to , then . Note that there is no assumption of
independence.[39]

Related distributions

Central limit theorem

The central limit theorem states that under certain (fairly common) conditions, the sum of many random
variables will have an approximately normal distribution. More specifically, where are
independent and identically distributed random variables with the same arbitrary distribution, zero mean, and
variance and is their mean scaled by

Then, as increases, the probability distribution of will tend to the normal distribution with zero mean and As the number of discrete events
variance . increases, the function begins to
resemble a normal distribution.
The theorem can be extended to variables that are not independent and/or not identically distributed if
certain constraints are placed on the degree of dependence and the moments of the distributions.

Many test statistics, scores, and estimators encountered in practice contain sums of certain random variables in them, and even more estimators can be
represented as sums of random variables through the use of influence functions. The central limit theorem implies that those statistical parameters will
have asymptotically normal distributions.

The central limit theorem also implies that certain distributions can be approximated by the normal distribution, for example:

The binomial distribution is approximately normal with mean and variance for large and for not too close to 0
or 1.
The Poisson distribution with parameter is approximately normal with mean and variance , for large values of .[40]
The chi-squared distribution is approximately normal with mean and variance , for large .
The Student's t-distribution is approximately normal with mean 0 and variance 1 when is large.
Whether these approximations are sufficiently accurate depends on the purpose for which they are needed, and the rate of convergence to the normal
distribution. It is typically the case that such approximations are less accurate in the tails of the distribution.
A general upper bound for the approximation error in the central limit theorem is given by the Berry–Esseen
theorem, improvements of the approximation are given by the Edgeworth expansions.

This theorem can also be used to justify modeling the sum of many uniform noise sources as Gaussian noise.
See AWGN.

Operations and functions of normal variables

The probability density, cumulative distribution, and inverse cumulative distribution of any function of one
or more independent or correlated normal variables can be computed with the numerical method of ray-
tracing[41] (Matlab code (https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/84973-integrate-and-classi
fy-normal-distributions)). In the following sections we look at some special cases.

Operations on a single normal variable

If is distributed normally with mean and variance , then Comparison of probability density
functions, for the sum of fair 6-
, for any real numbers and , is also normally distributed, with mean and sided dice to show their convergence to a
variance . That is, the family of normal distributions is closed under linear transformations. normal distribution with increasing , in
The exponential of is distributed log-normally: . accordance to the central limit theorem.
In the bottom-right graph, smoothed
The standard sigmoid of is logit-normally distributed: .
profiles of the previous graphs are
The absolute value of has folded normal distribution: . If this is known rescaled, superimposed and compared
as the half-normal distribution. with a normal distribution (black curve).
The absolute value of normalized residuals, , has chi distribution with one degree of
freedom: .
The square of has the noncentral chi-squared distribution with one degree of freedom: . If , the
distribution is called simply chi-squared.
The log-likelihood of a normal variable is simply the log of its probability density function:

Since this is a scaled and shifted square of a standard normal variable, it is distributed as a scaled and shifted chi-squared variable.
The distribution of the variable restricted to an interval is called the truncated normal distribution.
has a Lévy distribution with location 0 and scale .

Operations on two independent normal variables

If and are two independent normal random variables, with means , and variances , , then their sum will also
be normally distributed,[proof] with mean and variance .
In particular, if and are independent normal deviates with zero mean and variance , then and are also
independent and normally distributed, with zero mean and variance . This is a special case of the polarization identity.[42]
If , are two independent normal deviates with mean and variance , and , are arbitrary real numbers, then the variable

is also normally distributed with mean and variance . It follows that the normal distribution is stable (with exponent ).
If , are normal distributions, then their normalized geometric mean is a normal

distribution with and (see here (https://www.geogebra.org/geometry/qfqnjtsu) for

a visualization).

Operations on two independent standard normal variables

If and are two independent standard normal random variables with mean 0 and variance 1, then

Their sum and difference is distributed normally with mean zero and variance two: .
Their product follows the product distribution[43] with density function where is the modified Bessel
function of the second kind. This distribution is symmetric around zero, unbounded at , and has the characteristic function
.
Their ratio follows the standard Cauchy distribution: .

Their Euclidean norm has the Rayleigh distribution.

Operations on multiple independent normal variables
Any linear combination of independent normal deviates is a normal deviate.
If are independent standard normal random variables, then the sum of their
squares has the chi-squared distribution with degrees of freedom

If are independent normally distributed random variables with means and

variances , then their sample mean is independent from the sample standard deviation,[44] which
can be demonstrated using Basu's theorem or Cochran's theorem.[45] The ratio of these two
quantities will have the Student's t-distribution with degrees of freedom:

If , are independent standard normal random variables, then the

ratio of their normalized sums of squares will have the F-distribution with (n, m) degrees of
freedom:[46]

Operations on multiple correlated normal variables

A quadratic form of a normal vector, i.e. a quadratic function of multiple

independent or correlated normal variables, is a generalized chi-square variable.

Operations on the density function

The split normal distribution is most directly defined in terms of joining scaled sections of the density functions
of different normal distributions and rescaling the density to integrate to one. The truncated normal distribution
results from rescaling a section of a single density function.

Infinite divisibility and Cramér's theorem

For any positive integer , any normal distribution with mean and variance is the distribution of the sum of
independent normal deviates, each with mean and variance . This property is called infinite divisibility.[47]

Conversely, if and are independent random variables and their sum has a normal distribution, a: Probability density of a function
then both and must be normal deviates.[48] of a normal variable with
and . b: Probability
This result is known as Cramér's decomposition theorem, and is equivalent to saying that the convolution of two density of a function of two
distributions is normal if and only if both are normal. Cramér's theorem implies that a linear combination of normal variables and , where
, , , ,
independent non-Gaussian variables will never have an exactly normal distribution, although it may approach it
and . c: Heat map of the
arbitrarily closely.[33]
joint probability density of two
functions of two correlated normal
variables and , where ,
The Kac–Bernstein theorem
, , , and
The Kac–Bernstein theorem states that if and are independent and and are also independent, . d: Probability density
then both X and Y must necessarily have normal distributions.[49][50] of a function of 4 iid
standard normal variables. These
More generally, if are independent random variables, then two distinct linear combinations are computed by the numerical
and will be independent if and only if all are normal and , where denotes the method of ray-tracing.[41]
variance of .[49]

Extensions
The notion of normal distribution, being one of the most important distributions in probability theory, has been extended far beyond the standard
framework of the univariate (that is one-dimensional) case (Case 1). All these extensions are also called normal or Gaussian laws, so a certain ambiguity
in names exists.

The multivariate normal distribution describes the Gaussian law in the k-dimensional Euclidean space. A vector X ∈ Rk is multivariate-
k
normally distributed if any linear combination of its components Σj=1aj Xj has a (univariate) normal distribution. The variance of X is a
k×k symmetric positive-definite matrix V. The multivariate normal distribution is a special case of the elliptical distributions. As such, its
iso-density loci in the k = 2 case are ellipses and in the case of arbitrary k are ellipsoids.
Rectified Gaussian distribution a rectified version of normal distribution with all the negative elements reset to 0
Complex normal distribution deals with the complex normal vectors. A complex vector X ∈ Ck is said to be normal if both its real and
imaginary components jointly possess a 2k-dimensional multivariate normal distribution. The variance-covariance structure of X is
 described by two matrices: the variance matrix Γ, and the relation matrix C.
Matrix normal distribution describes the case of normally distributed matrices.
Gaussian processes are the normally distributed stochastic processes. These can be viewed as elements of some infinite-dimensional
Hilbert space H, and thus are the analogues of multivariate normal vectors for the case k = ∞. A random element h ∈ H is said to be
normal if for any constant a ∈ H the scalar product (a, h) has a (univariate) normal distribution. The variance structure of such
Gaussian random element can be described in terms of the linear covariance operator K: H → H. Several Gaussian processes became
popular enough to have their own names:
Brownian motion,
Brownian bridge,
Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process.
Gaussian q-distribution is an abstract mathematical construction that represents a q-analogue of the normal distribution.
the q-Gaussian is an analogue of the Gaussian distribution, in the sense that it maximises the Tsallis entropy, and is one type of Tsallis
distribution. This distribution is different from the Gaussian q-distribution above.
The Kaniadakis κ-Gaussian distribution is a generalization of the Gaussian distribution which arises from the Kaniadakis statistics,
being one of the Kaniadakis distributions.
A random variable X has a two-piece normal distribution if it has a distribution

where μ is the mean and σ12 and σ22 are the variances of the distribution to the left and right of the mean respectively.

The mean, variance and third central moment of this distribution have been determined[51]

where E(X), V(X) and T(X) are the mean, variance, and third central moment respectively.

One of the main practical uses of the Gaussian law is to model the empirical distributions of many different random variables encountered in practice. In
such case a possible extension would be a richer family of distributions, having more than two parameters and therefore being able to fit the empirical
distribution more accurately. The examples of such extensions are:

Pearson distribution — a four-parameter family of probability distributions that extend the normal law to include different skewness and
kurtosis values.
The generalized normal distribution, also known as the exponential power distribution, allows for distribution tails with thicker or thinner
asymptotic behaviors.

Statistical inference

Estimation of parameters
It is often the case that we do not know the parameters of the normal distribution, but instead want to estimate them. That is, having a sample
from a normal population we would like to learn the approximate values of parameters and . The standard approach to this
problem is the maximum likelihood method, which requires maximization of the log-likelihood function:

Taking derivatives with respect to and and solving the resulting system of first order conditions yields the maximum likelihood estimates:

Then is as follows:

Sample mean
Estimator is called the sample mean, since it is the arithmetic mean of all observations. The statistic is complete and sufficient for , and therefore
by the Lehmann–Scheffé theorem, is the uniformly minimum variance unbiased (UMVU) estimator.[52] In finite samples it is distributed normally:

The variance of this estimator is equal to the μμ-element of the inverse Fisher information matrix . This implies that the estimator is finite-sample
efficient. Of practical importance is the fact that the standard error of is proportional to , that is, if one wishes to decrease the standard error by a
factor of 10, one must increase the number of points in the sample by a factor of 100. This fact is widely used in determining sample sizes for opinion
polls and the number of trials in Monte Carlo simulations.

From the standpoint of the asymptotic theory, is consistent, that is, it converges in probability to as . The estimator is also asymptotically
normal, which is a simple corollary of the fact that it is normal in finite samples:

Sample variance
The estimator is called the sample variance, since it is the variance of the sample ( ). In practice, another estimator is often used instead
of the . This other estimator is denoted , and is also called the sample variance, which represents a certain ambiguity in terminology; its square root
is called the sample standard deviation. The estimator differs from by having (n − 1) instead of n in the denominator (the so-called Bessel's
correction):

The difference between and becomes negligibly small for large n's. In finite samples however, the motivation behind the use of is that it is an
unbiased estimator of the underlying parameter , whereas is biased. Also, by the Lehmann–Scheffé theorem the estimator is uniformly
minimum variance unbiased (UMVU),[52] which makes it the "best" estimator among all unbiased ones. However it can be shown that the biased
estimator is better than the in terms of the mean squared error (MSE) criterion. In finite samples both and have scaled chi-squared
distribution with (n − 1) degrees of freedom:

The first of these expressions shows that the variance of is equal to , which is slightly greater than the σσ-element of the inverse Fisher
information matrix . Thus, is not an efficient estimator for , and moreover, since is UMVU, we can conclude that the finite-sample efficient
estimator for does not exist.

Applying the asymptotic theory, both estimators and are consistent, that is they converge in probability to as the sample size . The two
estimators are also both asymptotically normal:

In particular, both estimators are asymptotically efficient for .

Confidence intervals
By Cochran's theorem, for normal distributions the sample mean and the sample variance s2 are independent, which means there can be no gain in
considering their joint distribution. There is also a converse theorem: if in a sample the sample mean and sample variance are independent, then the
sample must have come from the normal distribution. The independence between and s can be employed to construct the so-called t-statistic:

This quantity t has the Student's t-distribution with (n − 1) degrees of freedom, and it is an ancillary statistic (independent of the value of the parameters).
Inverting the distribution of this t-statistics will allow us to construct the confidence interval for μ;[53] similarly, inverting the χ2 distribution of the
statistic s2 will give us the confidence interval for σ2:[54]

where tk,p and χ 2k,p are the pth quantiles of the t- and χ2-distributions respectively. These confidence intervals are of the confidence level 1 − α, meaning
that the true values μ and σ2 fall outside of these intervals with probability (or significance level) α. In practice people usually take α = 5%, resulting in
the 95% confidence intervals. The confidence interval for σ can be found by taking the square root of the interval bounds for σ2.

Approximate formulas can be derived from the asymptotic distributions of and s2:
The approximate formulas become valid for large values of n, and are more convenient for the manual calculation since the standard normal quantiles
zα/2 do not depend on n. In particular, the most popular value of α = 5%, results in |z0.025| = 1.96.

Normality tests
Normality tests assess the likelihood that the given data set {x1, ..., xn} comes from a normal distribution. Typically the null hypothesis H0 is that the
observations are distributed normally with unspecified mean μ and variance σ2, versus the alternative Ha that the distribution is arbitrary. Many tests
(over 40) have been devised for this problem. The more prominent of them are outlined below:

Diagnostic plots are more intuitively appealing but subjective at the same time, as they rely on informal human judgement to accept or reject the null
hypothesis.

Q–Q plot, also known as normal probability plot or rankit plot—is a plot of the sorted values from the data set against the expected
values of the corresponding quantiles from the standard normal distribution. That is, it is a plot of point of the form (Φ−1(pk), x(k)), where
plotting points pk are equal to pk = (k − α)/(n + 1 − 2α) and α is an adjustment constant, which can be anything between 0 and 1. If the
null hypothesis is true, the plotted points should approximately lie on a straight line.
P–P plot – similar to the Q–Q plot, but used much less frequently. This method consists of plotting the points (Φ(z(k)), pk), where
. For normally distributed data this plot should lie on a 45° line between (0, 0) and (1, 1).

Goodness-of-fit tests:

Moment-based tests:

D'Agostino's K-squared test

Jarque–Bera test
Shapiro–Wilk test: This is based on the fact that the line in the Q–Q plot has the slope of σ. The test compares the least squares
estimate of that slope with the value of the sample variance, and rejects the null hypothesis if these two quantities differ significantly.
Tests based on the empirical distribution function:

Anderson–Darling test
Lilliefors test (an adaptation of the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test)

Bayesian analysis of the normal distribution

Bayesian analysis of normally distributed data is complicated by the many different possibilities that may be considered:

Either the mean, or the variance, or neither, may be considered a fixed quantity.
When the variance is unknown, analysis may be done directly in terms of the variance, or in terms of the precision, the reciprocal of the
variance. The reason for expressing the formulas in terms of precision is that the analysis of most cases is simplified.
Both univariate and multivariate cases need to be considered.
Either conjugate or improper prior distributions may be placed on the unknown variables.
An additional set of cases occurs in Bayesian linear regression, where in the basic model the data is assumed to be normally
distributed, and normal priors are placed on the regression coefficients. The resulting analysis is similar to the basic cases of
independent identically distributed data.
The formulas for the non-linear-regression cases are summarized in the conjugate prior article.

Sum of two quadratics

Scalar form
The following auxiliary formula is useful for simplifying the posterior update equations, which otherwise become fairly tedious.

This equation rewrites the sum of two quadratics in x by expanding the squares, grouping the terms in x, and completing the square. Note the following
about the complex constant factors attached to some of the terms:

1. The factor has the form of a weighted average of y and z.

2. This shows that this factor can be thought of as resulting from a situation where the reciprocals of

quantities a and b add directly, so to combine a and b themselves, it is necessary to reciprocate, add, and reciprocate the result again
to get back into the original units. This is exactly the sort of operation performed by the harmonic mean, so it is not surprising that
is one-half the harmonic mean of a and b.
Vector form
A similar formula can be written for the sum of two vector quadratics: If x, y, z are vectors of length k, and A and B are symmetric, invertible matrices of
size , then

where

The form x′ A x is called a quadratic form and is a scalar:

In other words, it sums up all possible combinations of products of pairs of elements from x, with a separate coefficient for each. In addition, since
, only the sum matters for any off-diagonal elements of A, and there is no loss of generality in assuming that A is symmetric.
Furthermore, if A is symmetric, then the form

Sum of differences from the mean

Another useful formula is as follows:

where

With known variance

For a set of i.i.d. normally distributed data points X of size n where each individual point x follows with known variance σ2, the
conjugate prior distribution is also normally distributed.

This can be shown more easily by rewriting the variance as the precision, i.e. using τ = 1/σ2. Then if and we
proceed as follows.

First, the likelihood function is (using the formula above for the sum of differences from the mean):

Then, we proceed as follows:

In the above derivation, we used the formula above for the sum of two quadratics and eliminated all constant factors not involving μ. The result is the
kernel of a normal distribution, with mean and precision , i.e.
This can be written as a set of Bayesian update equations for the posterior parameters in terms of the prior parameters:

That is, to combine n data points with total precision of nτ (or equivalently, total variance of n/σ2) and mean of values , derive a new total precision
simply by adding the total precision of the data to the prior total precision, and form a new mean through a precision-weighted average, i.e. a weighted
average of the data mean and the prior mean, each weighted by the associated total precision. This makes logical sense if the precision is thought of as
indicating the certainty of the observations: In the distribution of the posterior mean, each of the input components is weighted by its certainty, and the
certainty of this distribution is the sum of the individual certainties. (For the intuition of this, compare the expression "the whole is (or is not) greater
than the sum of its parts". In addition, consider that the knowledge of the posterior comes from a combination of the knowledge of the prior and
likelihood, so it makes sense that we are more certain of it than of either of its components.)

The above formula reveals why it is more convenient to do Bayesian analysis of conjugate priors for the normal distribution in terms of the precision.
The posterior precision is simply the sum of the prior and likelihood precisions, and the posterior mean is computed through a precision-weighted
average, as described above. The same formulas can be written in terms of variance by reciprocating all the precisions, yielding the more ugly formulas

With known mean

For a set of i.i.d. normally distributed data points X of size n where each individual point x follows with known mean μ, the conjugate
prior of the variance has an inverse gamma distribution or a scaled inverse chi-squared distribution. The two are equivalent except for having different
parameterizations. Although the inverse gamma is more commonly used, we use the scaled inverse chi-squared for the sake of convenience. The prior
for σ2 is as follows:

The likelihood function from above, written in terms of the variance, is:

where

Then:
The above is also a scaled inverse chi-squared distribution where

or equivalently

Reparameterizing in terms of an inverse gamma distribution, the result is:

With unknown mean and unknown variance

For a set of i.i.d. normally distributed data points X of size n where each individual point x follows with unknown mean μ and unknown
variance σ2, a combined (multivariate) conjugate prior is placed over the mean and variance, consisting of a normal-inverse-gamma distribution.
Logically, this originates as follows:

1. From the analysis of the case with unknown mean but known variance, we see that the update equations involve sufficient statistics
computed from the data consisting of the mean of the data points and the total variance of the data points, computed in turn from the
known variance divided by the number of data points.
2. From the analysis of the case with unknown variance but known mean, we see that the update equations involve sufficient statistics
over the data consisting of the number of data points and sum of squared deviations.
3. Keep in mind that the posterior update values serve as the prior distribution when further data is handled. Thus, we should logically
think of our priors in terms of the sufficient statistics just described, with the same semantics kept in mind as much as possible.
4. To handle the case where both mean and variance are unknown, we could place independent priors over the mean and variance, with
fixed estimates of the average mean, total variance, number of data points used to compute the variance prior, and sum of squared
deviations. Note however that in reality, the total variance of the mean depends on the unknown variance, and the sum of squared
deviations that goes into the variance prior (appears to) depend on the unknown mean. In practice, the latter dependence is relatively
unimportant: Shifting the actual mean shifts the generated points by an equal amount, and on average the squared deviations will
remain the same. This is not the case, however, with the total variance of the mean: As the unknown variance increases, the total
variance of the mean will increase proportionately, and we would like to capture this dependence.
5. This suggests that we create a conditional prior of the mean on the unknown variance, with a hyperparameter specifying the mean of
the pseudo-observations associated with the prior, and another parameter specifying the number of pseudo-observations. This number
serves as a scaling parameter on the variance, making it possible to control the overall variance of the mean relative to the actual
variance parameter. The prior for the variance also has two hyperparameters, one specifying the sum of squared deviations of the
pseudo-observations associated with the prior, and another specifying once again the number of pseudo-observations. Each of the
priors has a hyperparameter specifying the number of pseudo-observations, and in each case this controls the relative variance of that
prior. These are given as two separate hyperparameters so that the variance (aka the confidence) of the two priors can be controlled
separately.
6. This leads immediately to the normal-inverse-gamma distribution, which is the product of the two distributions just defined, with
conjugate priors used (an inverse gamma distribution over the variance, and a normal distribution over the mean, conditional on the
variance) and with the same four parameters just defined.
The priors are normally defined as follows:

The update equations can be derived, and look as follows:

The respective numbers of pseudo-observations add the number of actual observations to them. The new mean hyperparameter is once again a weighted
average, this time weighted by the relative numbers of observations. Finally, the update for is similar to the case with known mean, but in this case
the sum of squared deviations is taken with respect to the observed data mean rather than the true mean, and as a result a new interaction term needs to
be added to take care of the additional error source stemming from the deviation between prior and data mean.

Proof
The prior distributions are

Therefore, the joint prior is

The likelihood function from the section above with known variance is:

Writing it in terms of variance rather than precision, we get:

where
 Therefore, the posterior is (dropping the hyperparameters as conditioning factors):

In other words, the posterior distribution has the form of a product of a normal distribution over times an inverse gamma
distribution over , with parameters that are the same as the update equations above.

Occurrence and applications

The occurrence of normal distribution in practical problems can be loosely classified into four categories:

1. Exactly normal distributions;

2. Approximately normal laws, for example when such approximation is justified by the central limit theorem; and
3. Distributions modeled as normal – the normal distribution being the distribution with maximum entropy for a given mean and variance.
4. Regression problems – the normal distribution being found after systematic effects have been modeled sufficiently well.

Exact normality
Certain quantities in physics are distributed normally, as was first demonstrated by James Clerk Maxwell. Examples of
such quantities are:

Probability density function of a ground state in a quantum harmonic oscillator.

The position of a particle that experiences diffusion. If initially the particle is located at a specific point (that
is its probability distribution is the Dirac delta function), then after time t its location is described by a normal
distribution with variance t, which satisfies the diffusion equation . If the initial
location is given by a certain density function , then the density at time t is the convolution of g and the The ground state of a
normal probability density function. quantum harmonic
oscillator has the
Gaussian distribution.
Approximate normality
Approximately normal distributions occur in many situations, as explained by the central limit theorem. When the outcome is produced by many small
effects acting additively and independently, its distribution will be close to normal. The normal approximation will not be valid if the effects act
multiplicatively (instead of additively), or if there is a single external influence that has a considerably larger magnitude than the rest of the effects.

In counting problems, where the central limit theorem includes a discrete-to-continuum approximation and where infinitely divisible and
decomposable distributions are involved, such as
Binomial random variables, associated with binary response variables;
Poisson random variables, associated with rare events;
Thermal radiation has a Bose–Einstein distribution on very short time scales, and a normal distribution on longer timescales due to the
central limit theorem.

Assumed normality

I can only recognize the occurrence of the normal curve – the Laplacian curve of errors – as a very abnormal phenomenon. It is roughly
approximated to in certain distributions; for this reason, and on account for its beautiful simplicity, we may, perhaps, use it as a first
approximation, particularly in theoretical investigations.

— Pearson (1901)

There are statistical methods to empirically test that assumption; see the above Normality tests section.
 In biology, the logarithm of various variables tend to have a normal distribution, that is, they tend to
have a log-normal distribution (after separation on male/female subpopulations), with examples
including:

Measures of size of living tissue (length, height, skin area, weight);[55]

The length of inert appendages (hair, claws, nails, teeth) of biological specimens, in the direction
of growth; presumably the thickness of tree bark also falls under this category;
Certain physiological measurements, such as blood pressure of adult humans.
In finance, in particular the Black–Scholes model, changes in the logarithm of exchange rates, price
Histogram of sepal widths for Iris
indices, and stock market indices are assumed normal (these variables behave like compound
interest, not like simple interest, and so are multiplicative). Some mathematicians such as Benoit versicolor from Fisher's Iris flower
Mandelbrot have argued that log-Levy distributions, which possesses heavy tails would be a more data set, with superimposed best-
appropriate model, in particular for the analysis for stock market crashes. The use of the fitting normal distribution
assumption of normal distribution occurring in financial models has also been criticized by Nassim
Nicholas Taleb in his works.
Measurement errors in physical experiments are often modeled by a normal distribution. This use of a normal distribution does not
imply that one is assuming the measurement errors are normally distributed, rather using the normal distribution produces the most
conservative predictions possible given only knowledge about the mean and variance of the errors.[56]
In standardized testing, results can be made to have a normal distribution by either selecting the number and difficulty of questions (as
in the IQ test) or transforming the raw test scores into output scores by fitting them to the normal distribution. For example, the SAT's
traditional range of 200–800 is based on a normal distribution with a mean of 500 and a standard deviation of 100.

Many scores are derived from the normal distribution, including percentile ranks (percentiles or
quantiles), normal curve equivalents, stanines, z-scores, and T-scores. Additionally, some
behavioral statistical procedures assume that scores are normally distributed; for example, t-tests
and ANOVAs. Bell curve grading assigns relative grades based on a normal distribution of scores.
In hydrology the distribution of long duration river discharge or rainfall, e.g. monthly and yearly
totals, is often thought to be practically normal according to the central limit theorem.[57] The blue
picture, made with CumFreq, illustrates an example of fitting the normal distribution to ranked
October rainfalls showing the 90% confidence belt based on the binomial distribution. The rainfall
data are represented by plotting positions as part of the cumulative frequency analysis.
Fitted cumulative normal distribution
to October rainfalls, see distribution
Methodological problems and peer review fitting

John Ioannidis argued that using normally distributed standard deviations as standards for validating research
findings leave falsifiable predictions about phenomena that are not normally distributed untested. This includes, for example, phenomena that only
appear when all necessary conditions are present and one cannot be a substitute for another in an addition-like way and phenomena that are not randomly
distributed. Ioannidis argues that standard deviation-centered validation gives a false appearance of validity to hypotheses and theories where some but
not all falsifiable predictions are normally distributed since the portion of falsifiable predictions that there is evidence against may and in some cases are
in the non-normally distributed parts of the range of falsifiable predictions, as well as baselessly dismissing hypotheses for which none of the falsifiable
predictions are normally distributed as if were they unfalsifiable when in fact they do make falsifiable predictions. It is argued by Ioannidis that many
cases of mutually exclusive theories being accepted as validated by research journals are caused by failure of the journals to take in empirical
falsifications of non-normally distributed predictions, and not because mutually exclusive theories are true, which they cannot be, although two mutually
exclusive theories can both be wrong and a third one correct.[58]

Computational methods

Generating values from normal distribution

In computer simulations, especially in applications of the Monte-Carlo method, it is often desirable to
generate values that are normally distributed. The algorithms listed below all generate the standard normal
deviates, since a N(μ, σ2) can be generated as X = μ + σZ, where Z is standard normal. All these
algorithms rely on the availability of a random number generator U capable of producing uniform random
variates.

The most straightforward method is based on the probability integral transform property: if U is
distributed uniformly on (0,1), then Φ−1(U) will have the standard normal distribution. The
drawback of this method is that it relies on calculation of the probit function Φ−1, which cannot
be done analytically. Some approximate methods are described in Hart (1968) and in the erf
article. Wichura gives a fast algorithm for computing this function to 16 decimal places,[59]
The bean machine, a device invented by
which is used by R to compute random variates of the normal distribution.
Francis Galton, can be called the first
An easy-to-program approximate approach that relies on the central limit theorem is as follows: generator of normal random variables.
generate 12 uniform U(0,1) deviates, add them all up, and subtract 6 – the resulting random
This machine consists of a vertical board
variable will have approximately standard normal distribution. In truth, the distribution will be
with interleaved rows of pins. Small balls
Irwin–Hall, which is a 12-section eleventh-order polynomial approximation to the normal
are dropped from the top and then
distribution. This random deviate will have a limited range of (−6, 6).[60] Note that in a true bounce randomly left or right as they hit
normal distribution, only 0.00034% of all samples will fall outside ±6σ.
the pins. The balls are collected into bins
The Box–Muller method uses two independent random numbers U and V distributed uniformly at the bottom and settle down into a
on (0,1). Then the two random variables X and Y pattern resembling the Gaussian curve.
 will both have the standard normal distribution, and will be independent. This formulation arises because for a bivariate normal random
vector (X, Y) the squared norm X2 + Y2 will have the chi-squared distribution with two degrees of freedom, which is an easily
generated exponential random variable corresponding to the quantity −2 ln(U) in these equations; and the angle is distributed uniformly
around the circle, chosen by the random variable V.
The Marsaglia polar method is a modification of the Box–Muller method which does not require computation of the sine and cosine
functions. In this method, U and V are drawn from the uniform (−1,1) distribution, and then S = U2 + V2 is computed. If S is greater or
equal to 1, then the method starts over, otherwise the two quantities

are returned. Again, X and Y are independent, standard normal random variables.
The Ratio method[61] is a rejection method. The algorithm proceeds as follows:
Generate two independent uniform deviates U and V;
Compute X = √8/e (V − 0.5)/U;
Optional: if X2 ≤ 5 − 4e1/4U then accept X and terminate algorithm;
Optional: if X2 ≥ 4e−1.35/U + 1.4 then reject X and start over from step 1;
If X2 ≤ −4 lnU then accept X, otherwise start over the algorithm.

The two optional steps allow the evaluation of the logarithm in the last step to be avoided in most cases. These steps can be
greatly improved[62] so that the logarithm is rarely evaluated.

The ziggurat algorithm[63] is faster than the Box–Muller transform and still exact. In about 97% of all cases it uses only two random
numbers, one random integer and one random uniform, one multiplication and an if-test. Only in 3% of the cases, where the
combination of those two falls outside the "core of the ziggurat" (a kind of rejection sampling using logarithms), do exponentials and
more uniform random numbers have to be employed.
Integer arithmetic can be used to sample from the standard normal distribution.[64][65] This method is exact in the sense that it satisfies
the conditions of ideal approximation;[66] i.e., it is equivalent to sampling a real number from the standard normal distribution and
rounding this to the nearest representable floating point number.
There is also some investigation[67] into the connection between the fast Hadamard transform and the normal distribution, since the
transform employs just addition and subtraction and by the central limit theorem random numbers from almost any distribution will be
transformed into the normal distribution. In this regard a series of Hadamard transforms can be combined with random permutations to
turn arbitrary data sets into a normally distributed data.

Numerical approximations for the normal cumulative distribution function and normal quantile function
The standard normal cumulative distribution function is widely used in scientific and statistical computing.

The values Φ(x) may be approximated very accurately by a variety of methods, such as numerical integration, Taylor series, asymptotic series and
continued fractions. Different approximations are used depending on the desired level of accuracy.

Zelen & Severo (1964) give the approximation for Φ(x) for x > 0 with the absolute error |ε(x)| < 7.5·10−8 (algorithm 26.2.17 (https://sec
ure.math.ubc.ca/~cbm/aands/page_932.htm)):

where ϕ(x) is the standard normal probability density function, and b0 = 0.2316419, b1 = 0.319381530, b2 = −0.356563782, b3 =
1.781477937, b4 = −1.821255978, b5 = 1.330274429.
Hart (1968) lists some dozens of approximations – by means of rational functions, with or without exponentials – for the erfc()
function. His algorithms vary in the degree of complexity and the resulting precision, with maximum absolute precision of 24 digits. An
algorithm by West (2009) combines Hart's algorithm 5666 with a continued fraction approximation in the tail to provide a fast
computation algorithm with a 16-digit precision.
Cody (1969) after recalling Hart68 solution is not suited for erf, gives a solution for both erf and erfc, with maximal relative error bound,
via Rational Chebyshev Approximation.
Marsaglia (2004) suggested a simple algorithm[note 1] based on the Taylor series expansion

for calculating Φ(x) with arbitrary precision. The drawback of this algorithm is comparatively slow calculation time (for example it takes
over 300 iterations to calculate the function with 16 digits of precision when x = 10).
The GNU Scientific Library calculates values of the standard normal cumulative distribution function using Hart's algorithms and
approximations with Chebyshev polynomials.
Dia (2023) proposes the following approximation of with a maximum relative error less than in absolute
value: for
 and for ,

Shore (1982) introduced simple approximations that may be incorporated in stochastic optimization models of engineering and operations research, like
reliability engineering and inventory analysis. Denoting p = Φ(z), the simplest approximation for the quantile function is:

This approximation delivers for z a maximum absolute error of 0.026 (for 0.5 ≤ p ≤ 0.9999, corresponding to 0 ≤ z ≤ 3.719). For p < 1/2 replace p
by 1 − p and change sign. Another approximation, somewhat less accurate, is the single-parameter approximation:

The latter had served to derive a simple approximation for the loss integral of the normal distribution, defined by

This approximation is particularly accurate for the right far-tail (maximum error of 10−3 for z≥1.4). Highly accurate approximations for the cumulative
distribution function, based on Response Modeling Methodology (RMM, Shore, 2011, 2012), are shown in Shore (2005).

Some more approximations can be found at: Error function#Approximation with elementary functions. In particular, small relative error on the whole
domain for the cumulative distribution function and the quantile function as well, is achieved via an explicitly invertible formula by Sergei
Winitzki in 2008.

History

Development
Some authors[68][69] attribute the discovery of the normal distribution to de Moivre, who in 1738[note 2] published in the second edition of his The
Doctrine of Chances the study of the coefficients in the binomial expansion of (a + b)n. De Moivre proved that the middle term in this expansion has
1
the approximate magnitude of , and that "If m or ⁠2 ⁠n be a Quantity infinitely great, then the Logarithm of the Ratio, which a Term distant from
the middle by the Interval ℓ, has to the middle Term, is ."[70] Although this theorem can be interpreted as the first obscure expression for the normal
probability law, Stigler points out that de Moivre himself did not interpret his results as anything more than the approximate rule for the binomial
coefficients, and in particular de Moivre lacked the concept of the probability density function.[71]

In 1823 Gauss published his monograph "Theoria combinationis observationum erroribus minimis obnoxiae" where among other things he introduces
several important statistical concepts, such as the method of least squares, the method of maximum likelihood, and the normal distribution. Gauss used
M, M′, M′′, ... to denote the measurements of some unknown quantity V, and sought the most probable estimator of that quantity: the one that maximizes
the probability φ(M − V) · φ(M′ − V) · φ(M′′ − V) · ... of obtaining the observed experimental results. In his notation φΔ is the probability density
function of the measurement errors of magnitude Δ. Not knowing what the function φ is, Gauss requires that his method should reduce to the well-
known answer: the arithmetic mean of the measured values.[note 3] Starting from these principles, Gauss demonstrates that the only law that rationalizes
the choice of arithmetic mean as an estimator of the location parameter, is the normal law of errors:[72]
 where h is "the measure of the precision of the observations". Using this normal law as a generic model for errors in the
experiments, Gauss formulates what is now known as the non-linear weighted least squares method.[73]

Although Gauss was the first to suggest the normal distribution law, Laplace made
significant contributions.[note 4] It was Laplace who first posed the problem of
aggregating several observations in 1774,[74] although his own solution led to the
Laplacian distribution. It was Laplace who first calculated the value of the integral
2
∫ e−t dt = √ π in 1782, providing the normalization constant for the normal
distribution.[75] For this accomplishment, Gauss acknowledged the priority of
Carl Friedrich Gauss Laplace.[76] Finally, it was Laplace who in 1810 proved and presented to the academy
discovered the normal the fundamental central limit theorem, which emphasized the theoretical importance of
distribution in 1809 as a way
the normal distribution.[77]
to rationalize the method of
least squares. Pierre-Simon Laplace proved
It is of interest to note that in 1809 an Irish-American mathematician Robert Adrain
published two insightful but flawed derivations of the normal probability law, the central limit theorem in
1810, consolidating the
simultaneously and independently from Gauss.[78] His works remained largely unnoticed by the scientific community,
importance of the normal
until in 1871 they were exhumed by Abbe.[79] distribution in statistics.

In the middle of the 19th century Maxwell demonstrated that the normal distribution is not just a convenient
mathematical tool, but may also occur in natural phenomena:[80] The number of particles whose velocity, resolved in a certain direction, lies between x
and x + dx is

Naming
Today, the concept is usually known in English as the normal distribution or Gaussian distribution. Other less common names include Gauss
distribution, Laplace–Gauss distribution, the law of error, the law of facility of errors, Laplace's second law, and Gaussian law.

Gauss himself apparently coined the term with reference to the "normal equations" involved in its applications, with normal having its technical meaning
of orthogonal rather than usual.[81] However, by the end of the 19th century some authors[note 5] had started using the name normal distribution, where
the word "normal" was used as an adjective – the term now being seen as a reflection of the fact that this distribution was seen as typical, common – and
thus normal. Peirce (one of those authors) once defined "normal" thus: "...the 'normal' is not the average (or any other kind of mean) of what actually
occurs, but of what would, in the long run, occur under certain circumstances."[82] Around the turn of the 20th century Pearson popularized the term
normal as a designation for this distribution.[83]

Many years ago I called the Laplace–Gaussian curve the normal curve, which name, while it avoids an international question of priority, has
the disadvantage of leading people to believe that all other distributions of frequency are in one sense or another 'abnormal'.

— Pearson (1920)

Also, it was Pearson who first wrote the distribution in terms of the standard deviation σ as in modern notation. Soon after this, in year 1915, Fisher
added the location parameter to the formula for normal distribution, expressing it in the way it is written nowadays:

The term "standard normal", which denotes the normal distribution with zero mean and unit variance came into general use around the 1950s, appearing
in the popular textbooks by P. G. Hoel (1947) Introduction to Mathematical Statistics and A. M. Mood (1950) Introduction to the Theory of Statistics.[84]

See also

Mathematics portal

Bates distribution – similar to the Irwin–Hall distribution, but rescaled back into the 0 to 1 range
Behrens–Fisher problem – the long-standing problem of testing whether two normal samples with different variances have same
means;
Bhattacharyya distance – method used to separate mixtures of normal distributions
Erdős–Kac theorem – on the occurrence of the normal distribution in number theory
Full width at half maximum
Gaussian blur – convolution, which uses the normal distribution as a kernel
Gaussian function
 Modified half-normal distribution[85] with the pdf on is given as , where

denotes the Fox–Wright Psi function.

Normally distributed and uncorrelated does not imply independent
Ratio normal distribution
Reciprocal normal distribution
Standard normal table
Stein's lemma
Sub-Gaussian distribution
Sum of normally distributed random variables
Tweedie distribution – The normal distribution is a member of the family of Tweedie exponential dispersion models.
Wrapped normal distribution – the Normal distribution applied to a circular domain
Z-test – using the normal distribution

Notes
1. For example, this algorithm is given in the article Bc programming language.
2. De Moivre first published his findings in 1733, in a pamphlet Approximatio ad Summam Terminorum Binomii (a + b)n in Seriem Expansi
that was designated for private circulation only. But it was not until the year 1738 that he made his results publicly available. The
original pamphlet was reprinted several times, see for example Walker (1985).
3. "It has been customary certainly to regard as an axiom the hypothesis that if any quantity has been determined by several direct
observations, made under the same circumstances and with equal care, the arithmetical mean of the observed values affords the most
probable value, if not rigorously, yet very nearly at least, so that it is always most safe to adhere to it." — Gauss (1809, section 177)
4. "My custom of terming the curve the Gauss–Laplacian or normal curve saves us from proportioning the merit of discovery between the
two great astronomer mathematicians." quote from Pearson (1905, p. 189)
5. Besides those specifically referenced here, such use is encountered in the works of Peirce, Galton (Galton (1889, chapter V)) and
Lexis (Lexis (1878), Rohrbasser & Véron (2003)) c. 1875.

References

Citations
1. Norton, Matthew; Khokhlov, Valentyn; Uryasev, Stan (2019). 9. Stigler (1982)
"Calculating CVaR and bPOE for common probability 10. Halperin, Hartley & Hoel (1965, item 7)
distributions with application to portfolio optimization and density 11. McPherson (1990, p. 110)
estimation" (https://web.archive.org/web/20230331230821/http://
uryasev.ams.stonybrook.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Norto 12. Bernardo & Smith (2000, p. 121)
n2019_CVaR_bPOE.pdf) (PDF). Annals of Operations 13. Scott, Clayton; Nowak, Robert (August 7, 2003). "The Q-
Research. 299 (1–2). Springer: 1281–1315. arXiv:1811.11301 (h function" (http://cnx.org/content/m11537/1.2/). Connexions.
ttps://arxiv.org/abs/1811.11301). doi:10.1007/s10479-019- 14. Barak, Ohad (April 6, 2006). "Q Function and Error Function" (ht
03373-1 (https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs10479-019-03373-1). tps://web.archive.org/web/20090325160012/http://www.eng.tau.
S2CID 254231768 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:25 ac.il/~jo/academic/Q.pdf) (PDF). Tel Aviv University. Archived
4231768). Archived from the original (http://uryasev.ams.stonybr from the original (http://www.eng.tau.ac.il/~jo/academic/Q.pdf)
ook.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Norton2019_CVaR_bPOE. (PDF) on March 25, 2009.
pdf) (PDF) on March 31, 2023. Retrieved February 27, 2023. 15. Weisstein, Eric W. "Normal Distribution Function" (https://mathw
2. Tsokos, Chris; Wooten, Rebecca (January 1, 2016). Tsokos, orld.wolfram.com/NormalDistributionFunction.html). MathWorld.
Chris; Wooten, Rebecca (eds.). The Joy of Finite Mathematics 16. Abramowitz, Milton; Stegun, Irene Ann, eds. (1983) [June 1964].
(https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B9780128029671000 "Chapter 26, eqn 26.2.12" (http://www.math.ubc.ca/~cbm/aands/
073). Boston: Academic Press. pp. 231–263. doi:10.1016/b978- page_932.htm). Handbook of Mathematical Functions with
0-12-802967-1.00007-3 (https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fb978-0-12-8 Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables. Applied
02967-1.00007-3). ISBN 978-0-12-802967-1. Mathematics Series. Vol. 55 (Ninth reprint with additional
3. Harris, Frank E. (January 1, 2014). Harris, Frank E. (ed.). corrections of tenth original printing with corrections (December
Mathematics for Physical Science and Engineering (https://linkin 1972); first ed.). Washington D.C.; New York: United States
ghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B9780128010006000183). Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards; Dover
Boston: Academic Press. pp. 663–709. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12- Publications. p. 932. ISBN 978-0-486-61272-0. LCCN 64-60036
801000-6.00018-3 (https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fb978-0-12-80100 (https://lccn.loc.gov/64-60036). MR 0167642 (https://mathscinet.
0-6.00018-3). ISBN 978-0-12-801000-6. ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=0167642). LCCN 65-12253 (htt
4. Normal Distribution (http://www.encyclopedia.com/topic/Normal_ ps://www.loc.gov/item/65012253).
Distribution.aspx#3), Gale Encyclopedia of Psychology 17. Vaart, A. W. van der (October 13, 1998). Asymptotic Statistics (h
5. Casella & Berger (2001, p. 102) ttps://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511802256). Cambridge
6. Lyon, A. (2014). Why are Normal Distributions Normal? (https://a University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511802256 (https://doi.or
idanlyon.com/normal_distributions.pdf), The British Journal for g/10.1017%2Fcbo9780511802256). ISBN 978-0-511-80225-6.
the Philosophy of Science. 18. Cover, Thomas M.; Thomas, Joy A. (2006). Elements of
7. Jorge, Nocedal; Stephan, J. Wright (2006). Numerical Information Theory (https://archive.org/details/elementsinformat
Optimization (2nd ed.). Springer. p. 249. ISBN 978-0387-30303- 00cove). John Wiley and Sons. p. 254 (https://archive.org/detail
1. s/elementsinformat00cove/page/n279). ISBN 9780471748816.
8. "Normal Distribution" (https://www.mathsisfun.com/data/standar
d-normal-distribution.html). www.mathsisfun.com. Retrieved
August 15, 2020.
19. Park, Sung Y.; Bera, Anil K. (2009). "Maximum Entropy 41. Das, Abhranil (2021). "A method to integrate and classify normal
Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity Model" (https://w distributions" (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC84
eb.archive.org/web/20160307144515/http://wise.xmu.edu.cn/upl 19883). Journal of Vision. 21 (10): 1. arXiv:2012.14331 (https://a
oadfiles/paper-masterdownload/2009519932327055475115776. rxiv.org/abs/2012.14331). doi:10.1167/jov.21.10.1 (https://doi.or
pdf) (PDF). Journal of Econometrics. 150 (2): 219–230. g/10.1167%2Fjov.21.10.1). PMC 8419883 (https://www.ncbi.nl
CiteSeerX 10.1.1.511.9750 (https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdo m.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8419883). PMID 34468706 (https://
c/summary?doi=10.1.1.511.9750). pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34468706).
doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2008.12.014 (https://doi.org/10.1016%2F 42. Bryc (1995, p. 27)
j.jeconom.2008.12.014). Archived from the original (http://www.w 43. Weisstein, Eric W. "Normal Product Distribution" (http://mathworl
ise.xmu.edu.cn/Master/Download/..%5C..%5CUploadFiles%5Cp d.wolfram.com/NormalProductDistribution.html). MathWorld.
aper-masterdownload%5C2009519932327055475115776.pdf)
wolfram.com.
(PDF) on March 7, 2016. Retrieved June 2, 2011.
44. Lukacs, Eugene (1942). "A Characterization of the Normal
20. Geary RC(1936) The distribution of the "Student's ratio for the Distribution" (https://doi.org/10.1214%2Faoms%2F117773164
non-normal samples". Supplement to the Journal of the Royal 7). The Annals of Mathematical Statistics. 13 (1): 91–3.
Statistical Society 3 (2): 178–184
doi:10.1214/aoms/1177731647 (https://doi.org/10.1214%2Faom
21. Lukacs, Eugene (March 1942). "A Characterization of the s%2F1177731647). ISSN 0003-4851 (https://search.worldcat.or
Normal Distribution". Annals of Mathematical Statistics. 13 (1): g/issn/0003-4851). JSTOR 2236166 (https://www.jstor.org/stabl
91–93. doi:10.1214/AOMS/1177731647 (https://doi.org/10.121 e/2236166).
4%2FAOMS%2F1177731647). ISSN 0003-4851 (https://search. 45. Basu, D.; Laha, R. G. (1954). "On Some Characterizations of
worldcat.org/issn/0003-4851). JSTOR 2236166 (https://www.jsto the Normal Distribution". Sankhyā. 13 (4): 359–62. ISSN 0036-
r.org/stable/2236166). MR 0006626 (https://mathscinet.ams.org/
4452 (https://search.worldcat.org/issn/0036-4452).
mathscinet-getitem?mr=0006626). Zbl 0060.28509 (https://zbma JSTOR 25048183 (https://www.jstor.org/stable/25048183).
th.org/?format=complete&q=an:0060.28509).
Wikidata Q55897617. 46. Lehmann, E. L. (1997). Testing Statistical Hypotheses (2nd ed.).
Springer. p. 199. ISBN 978-0-387-94919-2.
22. Patel & Read (1996, [2.1.4])
47. Patel & Read (1996, [2.3.6])
23. Fan (1991, p. 1258)
48. Galambos & Simonelli (2004, Theorem 3.5)
24. Patel & Read (1996, [2.1.8])
49. Lukacs & King (1954)
25. Papoulis, Athanasios. Probability, Random Variables and
Stochastic Processes (4th ed.). p. 148. 50. Quine, M.P. (1993). "On three characterisations of the normal
distribution" (http://www.math.uni.wroc.pl/~pms/publicationsArticl
26. Winkelbauer, Andreas (2012). "Moments and Absolute Moments e.php?nr=14.2&nrA=8&ppB=257&ppE=263). Probability and
of the Normal Distribution". arXiv:1209.4340 (https://arxiv.org/ab
Mathematical Statistics. 14 (2): 257–263.
s/1209.4340) [math.ST (https://arxiv.org/archive/math.ST)].
51. John, S (1982). "The three parameter two-piece normal family of
27. Bryc (1995, p. 23) distributions and its fitting". Communications in Statistics –
28. Bryc (1995, p. 24) Theory and Methods. 11 (8): 879–885.
29. Cover & Thomas (2006, p. 254) doi:10.1080/03610928208828279 (https://doi.org/10.1080%2F0
30. Williams, David (2001). Weighing the odds : a course in 3610928208828279).
probability and statistics (https://archive.org/details/weighingodd 52. Krishnamoorthy (2006, p. 127)
scour00will) (Reprinted. ed.). Cambridge [u.a.]: Cambridge Univ. 53. Krishnamoorthy (2006, p. 130)
Press. pp. 197 (https://archive.org/details/weighingoddscour00wi
54. Krishnamoorthy (2006, p. 133)
ll/page/n219)–199. ISBN 978-0-521-00618-7.
55. Huxley (1932)
31. Smith, José M. Bernardo; Adrian F. M. (2000). Bayesian theory
(https://archive.org/details/bayesiantheory00bern_963) 56. Jaynes, Edwin T. (2003). Probability Theory: The Logic of
(Reprint ed.). Chichester [u.a.]: Wiley. pp. 209 (https://archive.or Science (https://books.google.com/books?id=tTN4HuUNXjgC&p
g/details/bayesiantheory00bern_963/page/n224), 366. g=PA592). Cambridge University Press. pp. 592–593.
ISBN 978-0-471-49464-5. ISBN 9780521592710.
32. O'Hagan, A. (1994) Kendall's Advanced Theory of statistics, Vol 57. Oosterbaan, Roland J. (1994). "Chapter 6: Frequency and
2B, Bayesian Inference, Edward Arnold. ISBN 0-340-52922-9 Regression Analysis of Hydrologic Data" (http://www.waterlog.inf
(Section 5.40) o/pdf/freqtxt.pdf) (PDF). In Ritzema, Henk P. (ed.). Drainage
Principles and Applications, Publication 16 (second revised ed.).
33. Bryc (1995, p. 35) Wageningen, The Netherlands: International Institute for Land
34. UIUC, Lecture 21. The Multivariate Normal Distribution (http://w Reclamation and Improvement (ILRI). pp. 175–224. ISBN 978-
ww.math.uiuc.edu/~r-ash/Stat/StatLec21-25.pdf), 90-70754-33-4.
21.6:"Individually Gaussian Versus Jointly Gaussian".
58. Why Most Published Research Findings Are False, John P. A.
35. Edward L. Melnick and Aaron Tenenbein, "Misspecifications of Ioannidis, 2005
the Normal Distribution", The American Statistician, volume 36,
59. Wichura, Michael J. (1988). "Algorithm AS241: The Percentage
number 4 November 1982, pages 372–373 Points of the Normal Distribution". Applied Statistics. 37 (3):
36. "Kullback Leibler (KL) Distance of Two Normal (Gaussian) 477–84. doi:10.2307/2347330 (https://doi.org/10.2307%2F2347
Probability Distributions" (http://www.allisons.org/ll/MML/KL/Nor 330). JSTOR 2347330 (https://www.jstor.org/stable/2347330).
mal/). Allisons.org. December 5, 2007. Retrieved March 3, 2017.
60. Johnson, Kotz & Balakrishnan (1995, Equation (26.48))
37. Jordan, Michael I. (February 8, 2010). "Stat260: Bayesian
61. Kinderman & Monahan (1977)
Modeling and Inference: The Conjugate Prior for the Normal
Distribution" (http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~jordan/courses/260-sp 62. Leva (1992)
ring10/lectures/lecture5.pdf) (PDF). 63. Marsaglia & Tsang (2000)
38. Amari & Nagaoka (2000) 64. Karney (2016)
39. "Expectation of the maximum of gaussian random variables" (htt 65. Du, Fan & Wei (2022)
ps://math.stackexchange.com/a/89147). Mathematics Stack 66. Monahan (1985, section 2)
Exchange. Retrieved April 7, 2024. 67. Wallace (1996)
40. "Normal Approximation to Poisson Distribution" (http://www.stat. 68. Johnson, Kotz & Balakrishnan (1994, p. 85)
ucla.edu/~dinov/courses_students.dir/Applets.dir/NormalApprox
2PoissonApplet.html). Stat.ucla.edu. Retrieved March 3, 2017. 69. Le Cam & Lo Yang (2000, p. 74)
70. De Moivre, Abraham (1733), Corollary I – see Walker (1985,
p. 77)
71. Stigler (1986, p. 76)
72. Gauss (1809, section 177)
73. Gauss (1809, section 179)
74. Laplace (1774, Problem III) 83. Kruskal & Stigler (1997).
75. Pearson (1905, p. 189) 84. "Earliest Uses... (Entry Standard Normal Curve)" (http://jeff560.tr
76. Gauss (1809, section 177) ipod.com/s.html).
77. Stigler (1986, p. 144) 85. Sun, Jingchao; Kong, Maiying; Pal, Subhadip (June 22, 2021).
"The Modified-Half-Normal distribution: Properties and an
78. Stigler (1978, p. 243)
efficient sampling scheme" (https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/ab
79. Stigler (1978, p. 244) s/10.1080/03610926.2021.1934700?journalCode=lsta20).
80. Maxwell (1860, p. 23) Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods. 52 (5):
81. Jaynes, Edwin J.; Probability Theory: The Logic of Science, Ch. 1591–1613. doi:10.1080/03610926.2021.1934700 (https://doi.or
7 (http://www-biba.inrialpes.fr/Jaynes/cc07s.pdf). g/10.1080%2F03610926.2021.1934700). ISSN 0361-0926 (http
82. Peirce, Charles S. (c. 1909 MS), Collected Papers v. 6, s://search.worldcat.org/issn/0361-0926). S2CID 237919587 (http
paragraph 327. s://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:237919587).

Sources
Aldrich, John; Miller, Jeff. "Earliest Uses of Symbols in Halperin, Max; Hartley, Herman O.; Hoel, Paul G. (1965).
Probability and Statistics" (http://jeff560.tripod.com/stat.html). "Recommended Standards for Statistical Symbols and Notation.
Aldrich, John; Miller, Jeff. "Earliest Known Uses of Some of the COPSS Committee on Symbols and Notation". The American
Words of Mathematics" (http://jeff560.tripod.com/mathword.htm Statistician. 19 (3): 12–14. doi:10.2307/2681417 (https://doi.org/
l). In particular, the entries for "bell-shaped and bell curve" (htt 10.2307%2F2681417). JSTOR 2681417 (https://www.jstor.org/st
p://jeff560.tripod.com/b.html), "normal (distribution)" (http://jeff56 able/2681417).
0.tripod.com/n.html), "Gaussian" (http://jeff560.tripod.com/g.htm Hart, John F.; et al. (1968). Computer Approximations. New
l), and "Error, law of error, theory of errors, etc." (http://jeff560.tri York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ISBN 978-0-88275-642-4.
pod.com/e.html). "Normal Distribution" (https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/inde
Amari, Shun-ichi; Nagaoka, Hiroshi (2000). Methods of x.php?title=Normal_Distribution), Encyclopedia of Mathematics,
Information Geometry. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0- EMS Press, 2001 [1994]
8218-0531-2. Herrnstein, Richard J.; Murray, Charles (1994). The Bell Curve:
Bernardo, José M.; Smith, Adrian F. M. (2000). Bayesian Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life. Free Press.
Theory. Wiley. ISBN 978-0-471-49464-5. ISBN 978-0-02-914673-6.
Bryc, Wlodzimierz (1995). The Normal Distribution: Huxley, Julian S. (1932). Problems of Relative Growth. London.
Characterizations with Applications. Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978- ISBN 978-0-486-61114-3. OCLC 476909537 (https://search.worl
0-387-97990-8. dcat.org/oclc/476909537).
Casella, George; Berger, Roger L. (2001). Statistical Inference Johnson, Norman L.; Kotz, Samuel; Balakrishnan,
(2nd ed.). Duxbury. ISBN 978-0-534-24312-8. Narayanaswamy (1994). Continuous Univariate Distributions,
Cody, William J. (1969). "Rational Chebyshev Approximations Volume 1. Wiley. ISBN 978-0-471-58495-7.
for the Error Function". Mathematics of Computation. 23 (107): Johnson, Norman L.; Kotz, Samuel; Balakrishnan,
631–638. doi:10.1090/S0025-5718-1969-0247736-4 (https://doi. Narayanaswamy (1995). Continuous Univariate Distributions,
org/10.1090%2FS0025-5718-1969-0247736-4). Volume 2. Wiley. ISBN 978-0-471-58494-0.
Cover, Thomas M.; Thomas, Joy A. (2006). Elements of Karney, C. F. F. (2016). "Sampling exactly from the normal
Information Theory. John Wiley and Sons. distribution". ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software. 42
Dia, Yaya D. (2023). "Approximate Incomplete Integrals, (1): 3:1–14. arXiv:1303.6257 (https://arxiv.org/abs/1303.6257).
Application to Complementary Error Function" (https://ssrn.com/ doi:10.1145/2710016 (https://doi.org/10.1145%2F2710016).
abstract=4487559). SSRN. doi:10.2139/ssrn.4487559 (https://do S2CID 14252035 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:142
i.org/10.2139%2Fssrn.4487559). S2CID 259689086 (https://api. 52035).
semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:259689086). Kinderman, Albert J.; Monahan, John F. (1977). "Computer
de Moivre, Abraham (1738). The Doctrine of Chances. American Generation of Random Variables Using the Ratio of Uniform
Mathematical Society. ISBN 978-0-8218-2103-9. Deviates" (https://doi.org/10.1145%2F355744.355750). ACM
Transactions on Mathematical Software. 3 (3): 257–260.
Du, Y.; Fan, B.; Wei, B. (2022). "An improved exact sampling
algorithm for the standard normal distribution". Computational doi:10.1145/355744.355750 (https://doi.org/10.1145%2F35574
Statistics. 37 (2): 721–737. arXiv:2008.03855 (https://arxiv.org/a 4.355750). S2CID 12884505 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/Co
bs/2008.03855). doi:10.1007/s00180-021-01136-w (https://doi.or rpusID:12884505).
g/10.1007%2Fs00180-021-01136-w). Krishnamoorthy, Kalimuthu (2006). Handbook of Statistical
Fan, Jianqing (1991). "On the optimal rates of convergence for Distributions with Applications. Chapman & Hall/CRC.
ISBN 978-1-58488-635-8.
nonparametric deconvolution problems" (https://doi.org/10.121
4%2Faos%2F1176348248). The Annals of Statistics. 19 (3): Kruskal, William H.; Stigler, Stephen M. (1997). Spencer, Bruce
1257–1272. doi:10.1214/aos/1176348248 (https://doi.org/10.121 D. (ed.). Normative Terminology: 'Normal' in Statistics and
4%2Faos%2F1176348248). JSTOR 2241949 (https://www.jstor. Elsewhere. Statistics and Public Policy. Oxford University Press.
org/stable/2241949). ISBN 978-0-19-852341-3.
Galton, Francis (1889). Natural Inheritance (http://galton.org/boo Laplace, Pierre-Simon de (1774). "Mémoire sur la probabilité
ks/natural-inheritance/pdf/galton-nat-inh-1up-clean.pdf) (PDF). des causes par les événements" (http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/
London, UK: Richard Clay and Sons. bpt6k77596b/f32). Mémoires de l'Académie Royale des
Sciences de Paris (Savants étrangers), Tome 6: 621–656.
Galambos, Janos; Simonelli, Italo (2004). Products of Random
Variables: Applications to Problems of Physics and to Translated by Stephen M. Stigler in Statistical Science 1 (3),
1986: JSTOR 2245476 (https://www.jstor.org/stable/2245476).
Arithmetical Functions (https://archive.org/details/productsofrand
om00gala). Marcel Dekker, Inc. ISBN 978-0-8247-5402-0. Laplace, Pierre-Simon (1812). Théorie analytique des
probabilités (https://archive.org/details/thorieanalytiqu00laplgoo
Gauss, Carolo Friderico (1809). Theoria motvs corporvm
coelestivm in sectionibvs conicis Solem ambientivm (https://arch g) [Analytical theory of probabilities]. Paris, Ve. Courcier.
ive.org/details/theoriamotuscor00gausgoog) [Theory of the Le Cam, Lucien; Lo Yang, Grace (2000). Asymptotics in
Motion of the Heavenly Bodies Moving about the Sun in Conic Statistics: Some Basic Concepts (second ed.). Springer.
Sections] (in Latin). Hambvrgi, Svmtibvs F. Perthes et I. H. ISBN 978-0-387-95036-5.
Besser. English translation (https://books.google.com/books?id=
1TIAAAAAQAAJ).
Gould, Stephen Jay (1981). The Mismeasure of Man (first ed.).
W. W. Norton. ISBN 978-0-393-01489-1.
 Leva, Joseph L. (1992). "A fast normal random number Rohrbasser, Jean-Marc; Véron, Jacques (2003). "Wilhelm Lexis:
generator" (https://web.archive.org/web/20100716035328/http:// The Normal Length of Life as an Expression of the "Nature of
saluc.engr.uconn.edu/refs/crypto/rng/leva92afast.pdf) (PDF). Things" " (http://www.persee.fr/web/revues/home/prescript/articl
ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software. 18 (4): 449–453. e/pop_1634-2941_2003_num_58_3_18444). Population. 58 (3):
CiteSeerX 10.1.1.544.5806 (https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdo 303–322. doi:10.3917/pope.303.0303 (https://doi.org/10.3917%
c/summary?doi=10.1.1.544.5806). doi:10.1145/138351.138364 2Fpope.303.0303).
(https://doi.org/10.1145%2F138351.138364). S2CID 15802663 Shore, H (1982). "Simple Approximations for the Inverse
(https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:15802663). Archived Cumulative Function, the Density Function and the Loss Integral
from the original (http://saluc.engr.uconn.edu/refs/crypto/rng/leva of the Normal Distribution". Journal of the Royal Statistical
92afast.pdf) (PDF) on July 16, 2010. Society. Series C (Applied Statistics). 31 (2): 108–114.
Lexis, Wilhelm (1878). "Sur la durée normale de la vie humaine doi:10.2307/2347972 (https://doi.org/10.2307%2F2347972).
et sur la théorie de la stabilité des rapports statistiques". JSTOR 2347972 (https://www.jstor.org/stable/2347972).
Annales de Démographie Internationale. II. Paris: 447–462. Shore, H (2005). "Accurate RMM-Based Approximations for the
Lukacs, Eugene; King, Edgar P. (1954). "A Property of Normal CDF of the Normal Distribution". Communications in Statistics –
Distribution" (https://doi.org/10.1214%2Faoms%2F117772879 Theory and Methods. 34 (3): 507–513. doi:10.1081/sta-
6). The Annals of Mathematical Statistics. 25 (2): 389–394. 200052102 (https://doi.org/10.1081%2Fsta-200052102).
doi:10.1214/aoms/1177728796 (https://doi.org/10.1214%2Faom S2CID 122148043 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:12
s%2F1177728796). JSTOR 2236741 (https://www.jstor.org/stabl 2148043).
e/2236741). Shore, H (2011). "Response Modeling Methodology". WIREs
McPherson, Glen (1990). Statistics in Scientific Investigation: Its Comput Stat. 3 (4): 357–372. doi:10.1002/wics.151 (https://doi.o
Basis, Application and Interpretation (https://archive.org/details/s rg/10.1002%2Fwics.151). S2CID 62021374 (https://api.semantic
tatisticsinscie0000mcph). Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-0-387- scholar.org/CorpusID:62021374).
97137-7. Shore, H (2012). "Estimating Response Modeling Methodology
Marsaglia, George; Tsang, Wai Wan (2000). "The Ziggurat Models". WIREs Comput Stat. 4 (3): 323–333.
Method for Generating Random Variables" (https://doi.org/10.18 doi:10.1002/wics.1199 (https://doi.org/10.1002%2Fwics.1199).
637%2Fjss.v005.i08). Journal of Statistical Software. 5 (8). S2CID 122366147 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:12
doi:10.18637/jss.v005.i08 (https://doi.org/10.18637%2Fjss.v005. 2366147).
i08). Stigler, Stephen M. (1978). "Mathematical Statistics in the Early
Marsaglia, George (2004). "Evaluating the Normal Distribution" States" (https://doi.org/10.1214%2Faos%2F1176344123). The
(https://doi.org/10.18637%2Fjss.v011.i04). Journal of Statistical Annals of Statistics. 6 (2): 239–265.
Software. 11 (4). doi:10.18637/jss.v011.i04 (https://doi.org/10.18 doi:10.1214/aos/1176344123 (https://doi.org/10.1214%2Faos%
637%2Fjss.v011.i04). 2F1176344123). JSTOR 2958876 (https://www.jstor.org/stable/2
Maxwell, James Clerk (1860). "V. Illustrations of the dynamical 958876).
theory of gases. — Part I: On the motions and collisions of Stigler, Stephen M. (1982). "A Modest Proposal: A New
perfectly elastic spheres". Philosophical Magazine. Series 4. 19 Standard for the Normal". The American Statistician. 36 (2):
(124): 19–32. doi:10.1080/14786446008642818 (https://doi.org/ 137–138. doi:10.2307/2684031 (https://doi.org/10.2307%2F268
10.1080%2F14786446008642818). 4031). JSTOR 2684031 (https://www.jstor.org/stable/2684031).
Monahan, J. F. (1985). "Accuracy in random number generation" Stigler, Stephen M. (1986). The History of Statistics: The
(https://doi.org/10.1090%2FS0025-5718-1985-0804945-X). Measurement of Uncertainty before 1900 (https://archive.org/det
Mathematics of Computation. 45 (172): 559–568. ails/historyofstatist00stig). Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-
doi:10.1090/S0025-5718-1985-0804945-X (https://doi.org/10.10 0-674-40340-6.
90%2FS0025-5718-1985-0804945-X). Stigler, Stephen M. (1999). Statistics on the Table. Harvard
Patel, Jagdish K.; Read, Campbell B. (1996). Handbook of the University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-83601-3.
Normal Distribution (2nd ed.). CRC Press. ISBN 978-0-8247- Walker, Helen M. (1985). "De Moivre on the Law of Normal
9342-5. Probability" (http://www.york.ac.uk/depts/maths/histstat/demoivr
Pearson, Karl (1901). "On Lines and Planes of Closest Fit to e.pdf) (PDF). In Smith, David Eugene (ed.). A Source Book in
Systems of Points in Space" (http://stat.smmu.edu.cn/history/pe Mathematics. Dover. ISBN 978-0-486-64690-9.
arson1901.pdf) (PDF). Philosophical Magazine. 6. 2 (11): 559– Wallace, C. S. (1996). "Fast pseudo-random generators for
572. doi:10.1080/14786440109462720 (https://doi.org/10.108 normal and exponential variates" (https://doi.org/10.1145%2F22
0%2F14786440109462720). S2CID 125037489 (https://api.sem 5545.225554). ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software. 22
anticscholar.org/CorpusID:125037489). (1): 119–127. doi:10.1145/225545.225554 (https://doi.org/10.11
Pearson, Karl (1905). " 'Das Fehlergesetz und seine 45%2F225545.225554). S2CID 18514848 (https://api.semantics
Verallgemeinerungen durch Fechner und Pearson'. A rejoinder" cholar.org/CorpusID:18514848).
(https://zenodo.org/record/1449456). Biometrika. 4 (1): 169–212. Weisstein, Eric W. "Normal Distribution" (http://mathworld.wolfra
doi:10.2307/2331536 (https://doi.org/10.2307%2F2331536). m.com/NormalDistribution.html). MathWorld.
JSTOR 2331536 (https://www.jstor.org/stable/2331536).
West, Graeme (2009). "Better Approximations to Cumulative
Pearson, Karl (1920). "Notes on the History of Correlation" (http Normal Functions" (https://web.archive.org/web/2012022920205
s://zenodo.org/record/1431597). Biometrika. 13 (1): 25–45. 1/https://wilmott.com/pdfs/090721_west.pdf) (PDF). Wilmott
doi:10.1093/biomet/13.1.25 (https://doi.org/10.1093%2Fbiome Magazine: 70–76. Archived from the original (https://wilmott.co
t%2F13.1.25). JSTOR 2331722 (https://www.jstor.org/stable/233 m/pdfs/090721_west.pdf) (PDF) on February 29, 2012.
1722). Zelen, Marvin; Severo, Norman C. (1964). Probability Functions
(chapter 26) (http://www.math.sfu.ca/~cbm/aands/page_931.ht
m). Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs,
and mathematical tables, by Abramowitz, M.; and Stegun, I. A.:
National Bureau of Standards. New York, NY: Dover. ISBN 978-
0-486-61272-0.

External links
"Normal distribution" (https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Normal_distribution), Encyclopedia of Mathematics, EMS
Press, 2001 [1994]
Normal distribution calculator (https://www.hackmath.net/en/calculator/normal-distribution)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Normal_distribution&oldid=1271995058"