U3LM07 Class 18ME302
U3LM07 Class 18ME302
Continuity equation
in differential form
Boundary layer and free stream for a flow over flat plate
Cont..
• u - velocity component along x direction.
• v - velocity component along y direction
• p - static pressure
• ρ - density.
• μ - dynamic viscosity of the fluid
The equations are now non-dimensionalised. The
length and the velocity scales are chosen
as L and U∞ respectively. The non-dimensional
variables are:
Cont..
• The non-dimensional variables are:
• where U∞ is the dimensional free stream velocity and the pressure is non-
dimensionalised by twice the dynamic pressure
• Using these non-dimensional variables, the Eqs (1) to (2) become,
Reynolds number
Order of Magnitude Analysis
• Let us examine what happens to the u velocity as
we go across the boundary layer.
• At the wall the u velocity is zero [with respect to
the wall and absolute zero for a stationary wall
(which is normally implied if not stated
otherwise)].
The value of u on the in viscid side, that is on the
free stream side beyond the boundary layer is U.
For the case of external flow over a flat plate,
this U is equal to U .
∞
Based on the above, we can identify the following
scales for the boundary layer variables:
6
Cont…
• As a consequence of the order of magnitude
analysis, can be dropped from
the x direction momentum equation, because
on multiplication with it assumes the
smallest order of magnitude.
Cont.
Similarly y direction momentum equation.
• All the terms of this equation are of a smaller
magnitude than those of Eq. 4.
• This equation can only be balanced if is
of the same order of magnitude as other
terms.
• Thus they momentum equation reduces to
7
Cont…
• This means that the pressure across the
boundary layer does not change. The pressure is
impressed on the boundary layer, and its value is
determined by hydrodynamic considerations.
• This also implies that the pressure p is only a
function of x. The pressure forces on a body are
solely determined by the inviscid flow outside
the boundary layer.
• The application of Eq. 3 at the outer edge of
boundary layer gives
8
Bernoulli’s equation form
• In dimensional form, this can be written as
10
• Solid surface:
• At the point of separation, boundary layer thickness becomes quite large for
the thin layer approximation to be valid.
• It is important to note that boundary layer theory can be used to locate the
point of seperation itself.
• This allows the marching in flow direction, as the solution at any location is
independent of the conditions farther downstream.
Blasius Flow Over A Flat Plate
• The classical problem considered by H. Blasius was
– Two-dimensional, steady, incompressible flow over a flat
plate at zero angle of incidence with respect to the
uniform stream of velocity U∞.
– The fluid extends to infinity in all directions from the
plate.
• The physical problem is already illustrated in Fig.
• Blasius wanted to determine
(a) the velocity field solely within the boundary layer,
(b) the boundary layer thickness ,
(c) the shear stress distribution on the plate, and
(d) the drag force on the plate.
• The Prandtl boundary layer equations in the case
under consideration are
• 1a Boundary conditions
• The local free stream velocity U(x) at section x is an obvious scale factor
for u, because the dimensionless u(x) varies between zero and unity
with y at all sections.
and
Cont…
• Hence ,After deducing we have 11a
• Where and
11b
12 13
• The boundary conditions , in combination with Eg. 12and (13) become
• at , therefore
at therefore
•
Cont…
• Equation 11a is a third order nonlinear differential equation .
Blasius obtained the solution of this equation in the form of series expansion
through analytical techniques
• We can rewrite Eq. (11a) as three first order differential equations in the following
way
(11b)
(11c)
Cont..
• Let us next consider the boundary conditions.
• The condition f(0)=0 remains valid.
0 0 0 0.33206
0.2 0.00664 0.006641 0.33199
0.4 0.02656 0.13277 0.33147
0.8 0.10611 0.26471 0.32739
1.2 0.23795 0.39378 0.31659
1.6 0.42032 0.51676 0.29667
2.0 0.65003 0.62977 0.26675
2.4 0.92230 0.72899 0.22809
2.8 1.23099 0.81152 0.18401
3.2 1.56911 0.87609 0.13913
3.6 1.92954 0.92333 0.09809
4.0 2.30576 0.95552 0.06424
4.4 2.69238 0.97587 0.03897
4.8 3.08534 0.98779 0.02187
5.0 3.28329 0.99155 0.01591
8.8 7.07923 1.00000 0.00000
Wall Shear Stress
• With the profile known, wall shear can be
evaluated as or
• Now
from table
or 16
• In 1951, Liepmann and Dhawan , measured the shearing stress on a flat plate
directly. Their results showed a striking confirmation of Eq 16.
• Total frictional force per unit width for the plate of length L is
• Therefore,
17
Substituting the values of u/U∞ and ɳ from (Eq13)& (Eq 11b) into
(Eq 17) and we obtained.
Boundary layer thickness
• Momentum thickness (δ**): It is defined as the loss of momentum in the
boundary layer as compared with that of potential flow. Thus
With the substitution of u/U∞ and ɳ from Eg. (13) and (11b), we can evaluate
numerically the value of δ** for a flat plate as
Separation of Boundary Layer
• It has been observed that the flow is reversed at
the vicinity of the wall under certain conditions.