PISA Concept-Paper
PISA Concept-Paper
Mathematics education has increasingly emphasized problem-solving skills as crucial for students' academic
success and real-world readiness (Kilpatrick, Swafford, & Findell, 2001). The Programme for International
Student Assessment (PISA) is a global measure that evaluates 15-year-old students’ competencies in reading,
science, and mathematics. PISA’s focus on problem-solving rather than rote memorization aligns with the
educational shift toward applying mathematical knowledge in new contexts (OECD, 2019). However, many
students face significant challenges in solving these PISA-like mathematical problems, which demand critical
thinking, creativity, and the ability to transfer knowledge to real-world scenarios (Stacey, 2011).
This study explores the different problem-solving techniques students employ when solving PISA-like
problems, aiming to deepen understanding of their approaches and identify obstacles they encounter. By
examining these factors, this research can guide educators in developing instructional practices that foster
problem-solving skills more effectively.
Objectives
1. Investigate and categorize students' problem-solving strategies when confronted with PISA-like
Mathematical problems.
2. Identify students' challenges in understanding and solving complex, real-world problems.
3. Provide insights and recommendations for improving mathematical instruction and problem-solving
skills in educational settings.
Methodology
1. Research Design
A mixed-methods approach, including both qualitative and quantitative data, will be used. This design
comprehensively explores students’ problem-solving strategies and challenges (Creswell, 2014).
2. Participants
The study will involve 45 high school students aged 15–16 from diverse schools, offering a representative
sample of varying mathematical abilities (Stake, 2010).
4. Data Analysis
Qualitative Analysis: Think-aloud protocols and interviews will be coded and analyzed thematically to
categorize problem-solving approaches and identify common obstacles (Braun & Clarke, 2006).
Quantitative Analysis: Statistical analysis of scores on PISA-like problems will evaluate the
effectiveness of various problem-solving techniques (Field, 2013).
Understanding students’ approaches to solving PISA-like problems is crucial to bridging gaps in problem-
solving skills and adapting teaching strategies accordingly. The findings from this study will provide valuable
insights into students’ thought processes and challenges, which can help educators and policymakers improve
mathematics instruction. By targeting specific skills and knowledge areas, educators can foster stronger
problem-solving skills that not only prepare students for PISA but also equip them for lifelong learning and
problem-solving (Boaler, 2016; Schoenfeld, 2011).
Expected Outcomes
Target Audience
Mathematics Educators
Curriculum Developers
Educational Policymakers
Researchers in Mathematics Education and Problem-solving
Budget Estimate
Conclusion
This study aims to provide insights into the problem-solving techniques and challenges that students encounter
when tackling PISA-like mathematical problems. By analyzing students' approaches and identifying common
obstacles, this research will contribute to developing effective instructional practices that emphasize critical
thinking, adaptability, and creativity in mathematics. These insights can directly inform curriculum design,
teacher training, and policy development, ultimately enhancing students' problem-solving abilities and
improving their performance on international assessments such as PISA (OECD, 2019; Schoenfeld, 2011).
References
Boaler, J. (2016). Mathematical Mindsets: Unleashing Students' Potential through Creative Math,
Inspiring Messages, and Innovative Teaching. John Wiley & Sons.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in
Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches.
Sage Publications.
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data. MIT Press.
Field, A. (2013). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. Sage.
Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (Eds.). (2001). Adding It Up: Helping Children Learn
Mathematics. National Academy Press.
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do. OECD Publishing.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2011). How We Think: A Theory of Goal-Oriented Decision Making and Its
Educational Applications. Routledge.
Stacey, K. (2011). The PISA View of Mathematical Literacy in Indonesia. Journal on Mathematics
Education, 2(2), 95-126.
Stake, R. E. (2010). Qualitative Research: Studying How Things Work. Guilford Press.