Page 1 of 15 - Cover Page Submission ID trn:oid:::1:3088000998
ASSIGNMENT BRIEF SOLUTION
Quick Submit
Quick Submit
Eastern Illinois University
Document Details
Submission ID
trn:oid:::1:3088000998
Submission Date
Jan 17, 2025, 10:05 AM CST
Download Date
Jan 17, 2025, 10:30 AM CST
File Name
Assignment Brief Solution
File Size
126KB
3,133 Words
23,008 Characters
Page 1 of 15 - Cover Page Submission ID trn:oid:::1:3088000998
1
Page 2 of 15 - AI Writing Overview Submission ID trn:oid:::1:3088000998
0% detected as AI
AI detection includes the possibility of false positives. Although some text in this submission is likely AI generated, scores below
the 20% threshold are not surfaced because they have a higher likelihood of false positives.
Disclaimer
Our AI writing assessment is designed to help educators identify text that might be prepared by a generative AI tool. Our AI writing
assessment may not always be accurate (it may misidentify writing that is likely AI generated as AI generated and AI paraphrased or
likely AI generated and AI paraphrased writing as only AI generated) so it should not be used as the sole basis for
adverse actions against a student. It takes further scrutiny and human judgment in conjunction with an organization's application of
its specific academic policies to determine whether any academic misconduct has occurred.
Frequently Asked Questions
How should I interpret Turnitin's AI writing percentage and false positives?
The percentage shown in the AI writing report is the amount of qualifying text within the submission that Turnitin’s AI writing
detection model determines was either likely AI-generated text from a large-language model or likely AI-generated text that was
likely revised using an AI-paraphrase tool or word spinner.
False positives (incorrectly flagging human-written text as AI-generated) are a possibility in AI models.
AI detection scores under 20%, which we do not surface in new reports, have a higher likelihood of false positives. To reduce the
likelihood of misinterpretation, no score or highlights are attributed and are indicated with an asterisk in the report (*%).
The AI writing percentage should not be the sole basis to determine whether misconduct has occurred.
The reviewer/instructor
should use the percentage as a means to start a formative conversation with their
student and/or use it to examine the submitted
assignment in accordance with their school's policies.
What does 'qualifying text' mean?
Our model only processes qualifying text in the form of long-form writing. Long-form writing means individual sentences contained
in paragraphs that make up a
longer piece of written work, such as an essay, a dissertation, or an article, etc. Qualifying text that has been determined to be likely
AI-generated will be highlighted in cyan in the submission, and likely AI-generated and then likely AI-paraphrased will be highlighted
purple.
Non-qualifying text, such as bullet points, annotated bibliographies, etc., will not be processed and can create disparity between the
submission highlights and the percentage shown.
Page 2 of 15 - AI Writing Overview Submission ID trn:oid:::1:3088000998
2
Page 3 of 15 - AI Writing Overview Submission ID trn:oid:::1:3088000998
Table of Contents
Table of Contents 1
Introduction 2
Question 1: Differential Procurement Strategies 2
1.1 Importance of Segmented Procurement Strategies 2
1.2 Portfolio/Segmentation Matrix (Kraljic Model) 3
1.3 Dynamic Characteristics of Suppliers 5
1.4 Power Balance and Interdependence 6
Question 2: Spend Analysis Process 8
2.1 Benefits and Risks of Spend Analysis 8
2.2 Strategic Sourcing Through Spend Analysis 8
2.3 ERP Limitations and Role of BI Systems 9
2.4 Challenges in Implementing Spend Analysis 9
2.5 Improving Spend Tools and Digitalization Impact 10
Conclusion 10
References 11
3
Introduction
The assignment aims to study and analyze procurement strategies, spend analysis techniques
in relation to contemporary demands of supply chains and organizations. It examines how
procurement approaches can be made differential for buying firms with time, for example,
implementing Kraljic's matrix in determining supplier segmentation characteristics while
balancing through power balance models like the Dutch Windmill, for example. Other purposes
include studying how spending analysis can assist businesses in exposing opportunities within
cost reduction, performance improvement, and compliance challenges, such as how data are
defined and controlled within organizations.
Question 1: Differential Procurement Strategies
1.1 Importance of Segmented Procurement Strategies
Figure 1 Visual framework of Segmented Procurement Strategies.
Source: Researcher’s own creation
The modern supply chain has so diverse a role for suppliers and products that they demand a
separate set of procurement strategies. Different suppliers are very different from one another
4
in terms of importance to an organization, criticality of the products, and the risks associated
with their operations. For example, a supplier that provides strategic components, such as
semiconductors, differs hugely from one providing routine items, such as office stationery
(Gelderman & Van Weele, 2005).
Segmented procurement strategies allow organizations to classify suppliers and products for
their strategic importance and associated risks. In this way, important suppliers receive focused
resources for proper attention, while procurement processes for routine ones are made more
efficient. For instance, the automotive giant Toyota applies this segmentation strategy to
manage its multi-tiered supplier networks. This means that important component producers are
linked closely with the automotive company, while cost-effective contracts come into play for
standard materials. Similar to this, Apple applies a very strategic approach to its core suppliers
of innovative, state-of-the-art technology components in ensuring the production of high quality
and reliable items (Durivage et. al., 2021).
Segmentation also enhances agility and risk management. Identifying the high-risk suppliers or
products allows for proactive contingency measures such as diversifying sources or investing in
dual sourcing. As Segmentation makes purchasing from a tactical activity to a strategic
function as Kraljic (1983), it strengthens supply chain resilience and increases operational
efficiency.
1.2 Portfolio/Segmentation Matrix (Kraljic Model)
Kraljic’s matrix a seminal framework in procurement classifies products into four categories:
leverage strategic bottleneck and routine. This categorization is based on two dimensions -
supply risk and financial impact - which guide organizations to tailor sourcing strategies for
each segment (Kraljic, 1983; Monczka et al.,2021)
5
Figure 2 Illustration of Purchasing Product Portfolio.
Source: Lecture Notes
These products have a high financial impact but low supply risk and often are available from
other sources. Competitive bidding is the preferred strategy to ensure cost-effectiveness. For
example, office supplies or generally-purpose components like screws are typically classified as
leverage products which enable buyers to capitalize on competitive offers among suppliers.
These products are characterized by high supply risk and low financial impact. Due to limited
supplier options and potential disruptions strategies focus on identifying supply and seeking
alternatives. An example is a niche raw material needed in specialized industries such as rare
metals for aerospace applications (Yue et. al., 2024).
Strategic products are critical to the organization's success having high financial impact and
high supply risk. Performance based partnership is essential for promoting collaboration and
innovation. With low financial impact and supply risk these products benefit from streamlined
processes such as e-procurement and systems contracting. Examples include cleaning supplies
or packaging materials widely available and standard.
6
1.3 Dynamic Characteristics of Suppliers
Figure 3 Figure 4 Illustration of Supplier Portfolio.
Source: Lecture Notes
Suppliers exhibit dynamic characteristics that influence their classification within Kraljic' s
segmentation model. Key attributes such as responsiveness innovation and scalability vary
across segments, driving targeted engagement strategies.
Strategic suppliers have responsiveness critical due to their impact on a company's operations
and competitive advantage. For example, Pfizer’s suppliers’ diversity strategy ensure reliable
access to essential materials during public health emergencies, demonstrating the focus on
innovation and scalability. Long-term partnerships, joint development programs and regular
performance reviews help maintain alignment to business objectives (Durivage & Parker 2023).
In the case of bottleneck suppliers’ innovation may be limited due to market constraints but
responsiveness is essential in order to mitigate supply risks. Organizations often negotiate
exclusive contracts or invest in Supplier Development to ensure consistent supply. For example,
rare earth metals for technology manufacturing often require careful sourcing from limited
suppliers or limited suppliers and can be found in the unlikely event of the need (Zanon et. al.,
2020).
The Leverage suppliers typically provide commodity goods with scalability and cost efficiency
7
as priority. Competitive bidding processes ensure cost reductions while supplier
responsiveness supports inventory optimization. For example, Walmart leverages its purchasing
power to negotiate favorable terms for routine products balancing cost and supply reliability
(Maloni & Benton 2000).
1.4 Power Balance and Interdependence
Power and interdependence influence the buyer-supplier dynamics both shaping negotiation
outcomes as well as strategic relationships. French and Raven (1959)’s power bases framework
categorizes power into mediated (reward, coercive, legitime) and non-mediated (2expert
referent and traditional) sources and provides insights
Mediated power is often evident in the buyer-dominated relationships such as Walmart's
interactions with suppliers. Reward power enables buyers to incentivize suppliers through extra
business for meeting targets while coercive power permits penalties such as contract
termination for non-compliance. Legitimal power grounded in formal agreements ensures
enforceable terms and conditions (Maloni & Benton 2000).
Figure 3 Illustration of Mediated Sources of power.
Sources: Lecture Notes
8
Non-mediated power fosters collaborative relationships. Expert power emerges when suppliers
offer unique knowledge or special capabilities. This can be seen in strategic relationships for
high-tech components such as semiconductors. Referent power is based on mutual respect and
reputation supports trust-based collaborations while traditional power reflects long-standing
industry norm.
Figure 5 Illustration of Non-Mediated Sources of power.
Sources: Lecture Notes
The Dutch Windmill Framework illustrates how the shifting power dynamics between buyer and
supplier depend on factors such as market conditions or product criticality. In highly
interdependent relationships power is balanced to ensure mutual benefit. In any industry
suppliers like Procter & Gamble leverage experts’ ability and referent power to maintain
favorable positions with large retailers.
9
Question 2: Spend Analysis Process
2.1 Benefits and Risks of Spend Analysis
Figure 6 Visual framework of Spend Analysis.
Source: Researcher’s own creation
Spend analysis is a process by which an organization may better its efficiency and thus provide
a range of benefits, including savings and improvements in compliance, as well as saving
detected by identifying risks. Organizations will use expenditure data to identify such savings
from supplier consolidation and bulk purchasers, as well as from favored terms through
negotiation. For example, Amazon does spend analyses in its logistics management, working
out route optimizations to cut down on transportation costs and simplify warehouse operations
(Robinson et. al., 2019).
Yet, it has some drawbacks; these would include the most common phenomena connected with
spend analysis-faulty data or half data causing false insights. Implementation problems are also
encountered, especially when organizations are converting from attracting such customers
using manual process to an automated system. Small and medium enterprises (SMEs), which
assume that they are using third party consultant service companies, often lack the resources
or relevant human capacity to deploy advanced applications. Besides that, integration of data
from different systems or businesses is very complicated, thus resulting in delays or ill-aligned
objectives (Lasta et al., 2012). As a result, organizations must therefore build a very strong data
governance and change management practice to gain full benefits in terms of spend analysis.
10
2.2 Strategic Sourcing Through Spend Analysis
The transition of tactical purchasing into strategic sourcing is enabled by spend analysis in
decision-making that is data-driven. Tactical purchase is when actual needs are paid attention
to, while strategic sourcing usually focuses on the long-term generation of value through
supplier relationships, cost efficiencies, and risk mitigation. Spend data helps organizations
identify which categories are being spent the most and analyze supplier performance so that
comprehensive sourcing strategies can be developed.
AI-based analytics such as Coupa, SAP Ariba can enable the companies to collect and make
analysis automated which will return a more obvious direction for supplier selection, contract
negotiation, and spend optimization. According to reports having implemented SAP Ariba, it has
achieved results in enhanced supplier collaboration and sourcing through adopted entailed
strategies of procurement (Rahman et al., 2024). In addition, the company minimizes cost while
ensuring a bit of flexibility by having long-term contracts with key suppliers. It also develops the
strategic suppliers through supplier development programs.
For example, a global automotive company was able to analyze its spend to shrink its supplier
base by 20 percent while establishing a deeper relationship with strategic suppliers. It now has
saved costs, improved its lead time, and streamlined all operations. Likewise, AI-powered tools
could allow companies to observe market trends and compare the performance of suppliers to
ensure they will not be left behind. Companies could derive many benefits and have a resilient
supply chain by embedding spend analysis in procurement activities.
2.3 ERP Limitations and Role of BI Systems
ERP systems are bases for procurement operations but are often very limited in handling data.
While ERPs are very good at data collection, storage, and processing transactions, they usually
lack advanced analytics or insights or intuitiveness in reporting. Challenges such as not being
able to customize much, difficulty with data retrieval, and lack of real-time analytics hamper
decision-making considerably (Mahmood et al., 2020).
BI tools can also offer easy-to-access dashboards, real-time analytics, and interactive
visualizations that overcome the limitations identified above. Unlike ERP systems, BI tools are
able to let procurement teams slice and dice spend data in any number of ways to identify
trends and produce reports tailored to their needs. For example, one pharmaceutical global
leader employed Power BI, integrated with its ERP system, to rationalize procurement reporting.
The customer reduced reporting time by a factor of 50% and discovered $10 million in annual
savings.
BI tools further facilitate cross-functional collaboration by collating data from a variety of
sources such as ERP systems, supplier portals, and external market data. Integration will enable
organizations to have a complete view of procurement and arrive at proper decisions. With the
integration of BI tools into their ERP systems, firms are able to solve the challenges in handling
data and thereby attain greater transparency in spend analytics.
11
2.4 Challenges in Implementing Spend Analysis
Spend analysis implementation faces a number of challenges, including limited spend visibility,
resource constraints, analytical capability gaps, and resistance to change. Fragmented data
sources, inconsistent coding practices, or manual processes lead to limited spend visibility,
which makes it hard to get a comprehensive view of expenditure. Resource constraints, such as
budget limitations or lack of skilled personnel, further hinder implementation, especially for
SMEs (Durivage & Parker, 2023).
Another major barrier will be the analytical capability gap: most organizations lack the
necessary tools or expertise to extract actionable insights from complex data sets. For example,
companies using basic spreadsheet solutions cannot analyze multi-dimensional data and might
lose opportunities. Other problems include resistance to change, where employees accustomed
to doing things a certain way in traditional procurement procedures may show resistance to
new technologies or workflows.
2.5 Improving Spend Tools and Digitalization Impact
To make spend analysis most effective, there is a need for improvement of tools at all five
stages involved: collection of data, cleaning of data, classification, analysis, and reporting.
Data Collection: In integrated systems such as ERP and databases of suppliers, all data should
ideally be collected. Tools like TealBook have been leading the way in supplier intelligence and
improve how companies access and integrate supplier data.
Data Cleansing: The inaccuracies in data are automatically detected and corrected using ML
algorithms. For instance, Rosslyn Data Technologies uses ML to standardize and validate
procurement data, thus reducing errors and making it more reliable. It helps classify the spend
data with a sophisticated AI-powered classification engine into the right categories, like
materials, services, and geographies, smoothly. This step further improves visibility of spending
patterns, thus enabling effective decision-making.
Industry 4.0 technologies, such as predictive analytics and natural language processing, give
deeper insights into procurement trends and the performance of suppliers. AI-powered tools
effectively identify opportunities to save costs, predict demand, and assess supplier risks.
Reporting: Tools such as Tableau and Power BI offer interactive dashboards for improved
reporting. The tools make it easier to access real-time insights that are also easy to
comprehend. Further, these platforms enable users to create customized reports for various
stakeholders.
Digitalization transforms the capabilities of spend analytics through the use of Industry 4.0
principles, thereby improving spend analytics. The integration of IoT data with blockchain
supports traceability and builds trust in procurement. Firms that implemented blockchain for
transparency within their supply chain reported improvements in supplier accountability, and
reduced fraud.
12
Conclusion
Some of the indispensable tools of modern supply chain management are differential
procurement strategies and spend analysis. Segmented procurement approaches, as identified
in question 1, with tools such as Kraljic's matrix, ensure that supplier relationships are
appropriately tailored, while power dynamics and responsiveness of suppliers identify strategic
engagement. Spend analysis was identified in question 2 as a tool that assists in cost reduction,
compliance, and strategic sourcing. AI and digital integration enhance these processes, helping
the organization overcome obstacles in implementation and leveraging active insights.
Together, they help organizations unlock procurement efficiency, improve collaboration with
suppliers, and drive sustainable advantage.
References
Durivage, M. A., & Parker, S. L. (Eds.). (2023). The ASQ Certified Supplier Quality Professional
Handbook. Quality Press.
French, J. R. (1959). The bases of social power. Studies in social power/University of Michigan
Press.
Gelderman, C. J., & Van Weele, A. J. (2005). Purchasing portfolio models: a critique and
update. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 41(3), 19-28.
Iqbal, M., & Matulevičius, R. (2021). Exploring sybil and double-spending risks in blockchain
systems. IEEE Access, 9, 76153-76177.
Kraljic, P. (1983). Purchasing Must Become Supply Management Harvard Business Review,
September.
Lasta et al (2012)- Spend Analysis and Opportunity Assessment
Mahapatra, M. S., & Mahanty, B. (2021). Effective public procurement of food grains: A case of
India under differential charges. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 154, 107165.
Mahmood, F., Khan, A. Z., & Bokhari, R. H. (2020). ERP issues and challenges: a research
synthesis. Kybernetes, 49(3), 629-659.
Maloni, M., & Benton, W. C. (2000). Power influences in the supply chain. Journal of business
logistics, 21(1).
Mishan, E. J., & Quah, E. (2020). Cost-benefit analysis. Routledge.
Monczka, R. M., Handfield, R. B., Giunipero, L. C., & Patterson, J. L. (2021). Purchasing & supply
chain management. Cengage Learning.
Rahman, M. A., Bhowmik, J., Ahamed, M. S., & Rahman, R. (2024). OPPORTUNITIES AND
CHALLENGES IN DATA ANALYSIS USING SAP: A REVIEW OF ERP SOFTWARE
13
PERFORMANCE. International Journal of Management Information Systems and Data Science,
volume1.
Robinson, L. A., Hammitt, J. K., & O’Keeffe, L. (2019). Valuing mortality risk reductions in global
benefit-cost analysis. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 10(S1), 15-50.
Yue, W. A. N. G., Ming, L. I. U., & Jie, C. A. O. (2024). Differential Game Analysis of Government-
Enterprise Procurement Strategy under Public Health Emergencies. Operations Research and
Management Science, 33(5), 112.
Zanon, L. G., Arantes, R. F. M., Calache, L. D. D. R., Martins, R., & Carpinetti, L. C. R. (2020).
Supplier Evaluation Based on Customer Value Perception: An Approach Combining Sentiment
Analysis and Fuzzy Inference. Available at SSRN 4626689.
14
15
