Đề bài: The graph shows the percentage of people

accessing news from 4 sources: TV, Radio, Newspaper,

Internet.
Bài làm:
Introduction: The graph
illustrates the popularity of 4
different news sources in
percentage between 1995 and
2025.
Overview: Overall, it is clear
that TV has been people’s main
source of news until 2020, while
the Internet has had a
significant surge in popularity.
Additionally, the Internet is the
only media that is getting more
favored while the other sources
are losing popularity over time.
Body 1: In 1995, TV started at
the top with 70% of the
surveyed population using it for
getting news, and Newspaper
and Radio got 57% and 52%,
respectively. The popularity of
these three sources has
decreased through the years,
with TV losing 20% by the end
of the period and Newspaper
and Radio’s figures are
expected to be halved.
Body 2: In contrast, the
Internet has displayed an
upward trend since 2000. While
at the beginning, the figure for
the Internet was zero, it has
rocketed from roughly 2% in
2000 to 40% by the end of
2020. It is forecasted to
continue its uptrend and
replace TV as the main source
for acquiring news, with 55%, in
2025.
Đề bài: The line graph below shows the production of
paper, wood pulp and sawn - wood in the UK from 1980
to 2000.
Introduction: The line chart
delineates the production of forest
industry in the UK spanning from
1980 to 2000.
Overview: As is shown in the graph,
paper and packaging was produced
the most in three years surveyed. It
is also clear that this product
showed overall growth over the
years whilst the opposite was true
for the other two categories.
Body 1: In 1980, the production of
paper and packaging stood at
around 230 million tonnes,
outnumbering other two figures for
sawn - wood (200 million tonnes)
and wood pulp (approximately 160
million tonnes). 10 years later, there
was a noticeable rise to 250 million
tonnes in the amount of paper and
packaging produced, which was
followed by a surge of 100 million
tonnes in 2000.
Body 2: On the other hand, sawn -
wood production witnessed a steep
decline, reaching its lowest point of
130 million tonnes in 2000. Wood
pulp showed not much of a
difference with only a negligible dip
in 1990 before recovering to finish
off at less than its original figure a
bit.
The graph shows how much chicken, beef,
lamb, and fish were consumed in a European
country between 1979 and 2004. Generally,
chicken consumption fluctuated with an
upward trend while the opposite trend was
recorded for that of beef, lamb, and fish.
Another striking feature is that fish was the
least preferred type of protein at any given
time. Meanwhile, chicken surpassed beef to
become the most consumed protein in the
second half of the period.
In 1979, beef was the most popular type of
food, with approximately 220 grams per
person per week. Meanwhile, the figure for
chicken ranked third at roughly 150 grams.
The amount of chicken consumed then
experienced a period of fluctuation with an
upward trend, while the reverse trend was
recorded for that of beef. Over the next 10
years, chicken consumption hit around 200
grams whereas the consumption of beef fell
substantially to below 200 grams. From 1989
onwards, the consumption of chicken
continued to rise and finally hit around 240
grams and became the most popular type of
food. Meanwhile, the figure for beef
fluctuated with a downward trend and stood
at about 110 grams in 2004.
 Regarding the remaining types of food, the
figures for lamb and fish stood at around 150
grams and 50 grams respectively in 1979.
After that, lamb consumption kept
decreasing and reached approximately 75
grams in 2004. As for fish, the amount of fish
eaten fell slightly and remained unchanged
at more or less than 50 grams throughout
the period under study.
The graph below shows the consumption of fish and
different kinds of meat in a European country between
1979 and 2004.

The graph below shows consumers’ average annual

expenditure on cell phone, national and international
fixed-line and services in America between 2001 and
2010.
The line graph illustrates the
average amount of money
spent annually on mobile
phone services, and national
and international landline
services in the US over a
period of 9 years. Overall, it is
clear that while the yearly
spending on mobile phones
increased significantly, the
opposite was true for national
landline phone expenditure. It
is also noticeable that the
figure for international fixed-
line services was lowest during
most of the period.
In detail, in 2001, there was an
average of nearly $700 spent
on national landline phone
services by US residents, in
comparison with only around
$200 a piece on mobile phone
and international landline
services. Over the next five
years, the average amount
spent on national fixed-line
phone services fell
substantially by approximately
$200. By contrast, yearly
spending on cell phone
services witnessed a
significant increase of roughly
$300. At the same time, the
figure for overseas landline
services remained stable at
$300.
In 2006, US consumers spent
the same amount of money on
mobile and national fixed-line
services, at just over $500 on
each. From 2006 onwards, it
can be seen that the average
yearly expenditure on mobile
phone services surpassed that
of national fixed-line phone
services and became the most
common means of
telecommunication. To be
more specific, yearly spending
on mobile phone services
increased to nearly $750 in
the final year, while the figure
for national landline phone
services decreased to about
$400 by the end of the period.
Finally, there was stability in
the figure for overseas phone
services.