PHILO REVIEWER
PHILO REVIEWER
PHILO REVIEWER
Plato (Socrates's most famous student) The authors of this theory are the Stoics,
- a good example of metaphysician. Epicureans, and Jeremy Bentham. What
: According to Plato, nothing we experience is good for the greatest number of people is
in the physical world with our five senses is the best choice and the moral choice.
real.
For example, if killing a cow is to save
Plato called the Truth as consisted in seven children from starvation, killing the
ideas or forms also referred as the cow is moral.
universals or absolutes: and such we
consider when discussing morals, 3. Deontological Ethics (Duty Ethics or
mathematical, and scientific ideas. Kantianism)
What is my moral duty?
Ethics
1. How do we distinguish good from evil or - Immanuel Kant is the author of this
right from wrong? ethical theory.
- From the Greek word: Ethos : This theory means that a person is bound
- Ethics means character, habit, norms, to duty and does not focus on what a
ways of behavior, etc. person thinks or feels about the situation.
- Ethicists appeal to logical arguments to - Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle are some
justify claims and positions involving of the proponents of this theory.
morality. They use ethical theory in the - This ethical theory ignores the
analysis and deliberation of issues. consequences, duties, and social contracts.
Instead, it focuses on the character
Ethics have five main positions: development of individuals and their
1. Natural Law or Divine Command
acquisition of good virtue ethics (Tavani,
2011). : The word essentially refers to a
systematic study of human reasoning.
5. Relativism - It is crucial to emphasize that logic does
What does my culture or society think is not offer direct knowledge about the world.
acceptable? Instead, it functions as the tool that
evaluates the structure of our reasoning
- "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" rather than the specific content of our
is a view of ethical relativism that actions thoughts.
are morally right within a particular society
when they are approved by law, custom, or Logic is unconcerned with the
the convention of the society. knowledge we possess about particular
subjects; its focus lies on determining the
Epistemology validity and truthfulness of arguments
1. How do we acquire reliable knowledge? related to the subjects.
- Epistemology deals with nature, sources, from the Greek word: aisthētikos
limitations, and validity of knowledge : perceptive, sensitive, pertaining to
(Soccio, 2007). sensory perception.
Empiricism is the view that knowledge can - The establishment of criteria of beauty is
be attained only through sense experience. the function of aesthetics.
Postmodernists share these attitudes: Logic and critical thinking consider these
1. Truth is beyond the rational to the three concepts interpreting the meaning of
nonrational elements of human facts:
nature, including the spiritual. 1. Cultural systems
2. Realize the limit of reason and 2. Values
objectivism. 3. Beliefs
3. Adhere to a relational, holistic
approach. - Critical thinking helps us uncover
bias and prejudice and become
open to new ideas not necessarily
in agreement with our previous : Validity arises from logical
thoughts. conclusions based on the two
- Warnings, piece of advice, beliefs, or logically constructed premises.
opinions lack a claim that However, the conclusion is not
establishes provability. There is no necessarily true or false. (e.g.,
argument that is without evidence or deductive reasoning or argument)
reason supporting its conclusion. 2. Strength of an argument
- A factual claim must present : Multistage random sampling and
evidence or reason. surveys are examples of inductive
reasoning. Surveys try to get many
Two Parts of an Argument specific examples to arrive at a
Premises general and educated guess.
- Statements that claim to present the Example:
evidence or reasons, for instance, Jay: Do you think Congressman Lito will be
consider: Human cloning is evil. re-elected?
Conclusion Yna: I doubt it. His district has become more
- In this case, the conclusion: Human liberal in recent years. Also, 60% of the
cloning should never be allowed. registered voters in his district are gearing
up for his rival in office.
Two Basic Types of Reasoning
This argument consists of two common
1. Deductive – draws conclusion from patterns of inductive reasoning, statistical
usually one broad judgement or argument and predictive argument. Also,
definition and one more specific the conclusion does not necessarily follow
assertion, often an inference. from the premise.
Example:
All truth seekers are prudent. (Major F. Fallacy
premise) Kong Zi is a truth-seeker. - A defect in an argument, and to
(Minor premise) Therefore, Kong Zi detect it, we examine the content of
is prudent. (Conclusion) the argument.
2. Inductive – based on
observations in order to make Some of the usually committed errors in
generalizations. reasoning:
Example: Many people are holding
their umbrellas, the ground is wet, 1. Appeal to pity (Argumentum ad
and the wind is strong, so probably it misericordiam)
is raining. A specific kind of appeal to emotion
that is used by exploiting his or her
It is important to consider building a strong opponent’s feelings of pity or guilt.
and valid reasoning. 2. Appeal to ignorance
(Argumentum ad ignorantiam)
1. Validity and soundness of an A fallacy following an assumption
argument that whatever has not been
proven false must be true, and
vice versa. 9. False cause (Post hoc)
3. Equivocation Since that event followed this one,
A fallacy when a term or a that event must have been caused
particular word is used in the by this one. This fallacy is also
same context but has a different referred to as coincidental
meaning each time. correlation or correlation not
Example: causation.
a. Human beings have hands; the
clock has hands. 10.Hasty generalization.
b. He is drinking from the pitcher of One commits errors if one reaches
water; he is a baseball pitcher an inductive generalization
4. Composition grounded on inadequate
This infers that something is true evidence. The fallacy is commonly
of the whole from the fact that it is based on an expansive conclusion
true of some part of the whole. The upon the statistics of a survey of a
reverse of this fallacy is division. small group that inadequately
5. Division represents the whole population.
One reasons logically that 11.Begging the question (Petitio
something true of a thing must principii)
also be true of all or some of its This is a type of fallacy in which
parts. the proposition to be proven is
6. Against the person (Argumentum assumed implicitly or explicitly in
ad hominem) the premise.
This fallacy attempts to link the
validity of a premise to a Determining Truth from Opinion:
characteristic or credentials of the Opinion
person supporting the premise. It can be a belief or judgment that rests
However, in some instances, on grounds insufficient to produce
questions of personal conduct, complete certainty. It is a personal view,
character, and motives among attitude, or appraisal or personal feelings.
others are legitimate if relevant to
the issue. Truth
7. Appeal to force (Argumentum ad Knowledge cannot be doubted. It is certain
baculum) and a justified true belief. Truth is the
An argument where strength, thoughts in the mind that conform to the
coercion, or the threat of force is reality of the world.
a justification for a conclusion.
8. Appeal to the people Critical thinking and logic are important
(Argumentum ad populum) tools to distinguish facts from opinion.
An argument that appeals or
exploits people’s vanities, desire “The truth is always the strongest argument.
for esteem, and anchoring on The truth is always the strongest argument.”
popularity. - Sophocles
again depending on the spirit's GOOD
L3: The Human Person as an Embodied KARMA or BAD KARMA (there is an
Spirit endless cycle of birth and rebirth)
A. The Human Person as an Humanity's basic goal in life is the liberation
Embodied Spirit of spirit:
: There are many beliefs of Moksha - freedom from rebirth. In this case,
transcendence, specifically: Taoism, moksha is an enlightened state wherein one
Kant's Transcendental Idealism, attains one's true selfhood and finds oneself
or Existentialist’s Authentic reunited with Brahman, the Ultimate Reality.
Existence; however, this lesson
shall focus on three main Self-knowledge is understood in the sense
philosophies: of morality and not in the sense of reason,
beliefs, and values
Hinduism, Buddhism, and (Real self - atman)
Christianity
- They believe in ONENESS of reality
Hinduism: Brahman is Selfhood - Bhagavad Gita
- Only Brahman is real, everything
Oldest: Eastern tradition, practiced by else is an illusory manifestation of it.
hundreds of millions of people for about
5000 years. Four primary values:
With a single-hearted purpose, this :For him, human beings are moral agents
brotherhood of believers dedicated itself to: who have both spiritual and body elements.
• The Beauty of Nature - Aquinas argued "The highest activity a human being can
that since nothing cannot become attain is learning for understanding,
something on its own, he then states that because to understand is to be free."
there must be a Being who caused the big - Baruch Spinoza
bang and humanity's creation, the
Unmoved Mover, the One who caused
everything to exist. L4: The Human Person In The
Environment
• Vulnerability - To be invulnerable is
somehow inhuman. To be vulnerable is to Humanity's Well-being and their
be human. Environment
Paradigm shift:
• Failure - Our failure forces us to A change in worldview, a change in how
confront our weaknesses and reality, truth, and facts are viewed.
limitations. Such acceptance of our failures
makes us hope and trust that all can be (E.g. When the Catholic Church and
brought to good. Medieval Scholars mistakenly thought that
the world was flat, until Magellan and the
• Loneliness - can be rooted from our Age of Exploration proved this view wrong.)
sense of vulnerability and fear of death.
Lao Tzu
• Love - To love is to experience richness, - One of the most prominent
positivity, and transcendence. Whether in philosophers of nature.
times of ecstatic moments or struggles, the - Founder of Taoism
love for a friend, between family members, - Lao Tzu compared the Tao or The
Way to water, heaven, emptiness of
a vessel, color, music, flavor, and - Humanity claims ownership or
even to weakness (Quito, 1991). authority over its environment.
- He claimed that weakness can - Unfair or unjust utilization of the
overcome strength (e.g. Water can environment results in ecological
erode stone, Air can penetrate a crises and disasters. (e.g. Quarrying
solid wall. or cutting down age-old trees could
justify our exploitative attitude
Two Main Frameworks toward nature.
Different views or concepts on nature or the - Emphasize the ecological or
environment. relational integrity that provides
meaning to our moral and values.
Anthropocentric Model - Prioritizes the ecosystem and
Human presupposes that the natural world
has intrinsic value.
Culture
- Nature is not only valued for the
Individualism survival of human species but is
also invaluable in itself.
Mind
- Love, respect, admiration for
Calculative nature, and a high regard for its
Human over/against environment value are essential.
Global/technological
B. Noticing Things that are not in the
Proper Place
Ecocentric Model
Nature Ancient Thinkers:
Anaximander
Wild
- He employed the term "boundless"
Holism to convey the further thought that
Nature/cosmos
nature is indeterminate boundless in
the sense that no boundaries
Body between the warm and cold or the
Relational most and dry regions are originally
present within it.
Earth/wisdom