Lecture 4
Lecture 4
Objectives
In this course you will learn the following
In the previous lecture we looked at a simple rotor wherein the disc was centrally located on the shaft and
we studied the effect of unbalance. Now we will try and gain an appreciation of some more interesting
problem situations in the field of rotor dynamics.
Consider the shaft system shown in Fig 2.2.1, wherein the disc is located at a point away from the mid-
length of the shaft. Fig. 2.2.2 shows two positions and the point of interest is the orientation of the disc.
As per Euler-Bernoulli beam bending theory, a plane cross-section remains plane and normal to the
neutral axis even after bending. Thus we observe that the disc has actually rotated about an axis
perpendicular to the plane of the figure. The moment of inertia of the disc therefore plays a significant role
in this rotation of the disc and has an affect on the dynamics of the rotor-shaft system.
The location of the disc on the shaft and the particular shape of deformation of the shaft determine the
extent of the influence. As shown in Fig 2.2.3, the steeper the variations in the slope of the shaft in the
deformed shape, the larger the rotations of the disc and hence the larger the influence. Thus an accurate
analysis of the dynamics of the rotor will need to take into account this influence.
We have so far assumed that the bearings are stiff. A normal hydrodynamic bearing, however, has finite
stiffness and damping. Also, these may not be the same in all directions. A typical model of a rotor in
journal bearings is shown in Fig. 2.2.4. We need to take into account the general non-linear and anisotropic
bearing stiffness/damping properties. Thus an accurate model of the entire system would become quite
complex and will need advanced modeling techniques.
When we consider a typical rotor of a turbine or compressor it is likely to have multiple stages and in each
stage several blades attached around the circumference of the disk. A single stage is schematically shown in
Fig. 3.2.5. Several blades are sometimes grouped together using “lacing wires”. Also, not all the blades in a
stage will be exactly identical due to various manufacturing process variations etc. The individual blades are
of aero-foil cross-section and are twisted / tapered and attached at a stagger angle to the disk. Thus the
dynamics of the complete bladed-disk unit is quite a challenging problem.
Fig 3.2.5
Thus you will appreciate that the field of rotor-dynamics offers many practically significant and theoretically
challenging research problems. We will however restrict our discussion to just the problem of achieving
“balance”.
A rotor can in general have two types of unbalance viz., “static” and “dynamic”. It is of course to be
appreciated that practical systems will all have dynamic unbalance only and considering it as static
unbalance is a “good-enough” approximation for some cases.
If the rotor is thin enough (longitudinally) as shown in Fig. 2.2.6, the unbalance force can be assumed to be
confined to one plane (the plane of the disc). Such a case is known as “static” unbalance. Such a system
when mounted on a knife-edge as shown in Fig. 2.2.7, will always come to rest in one position only – where
the centre of gravity comes vertically below the knife-edge point. Thus in order to “balance out”, all we
need to do is to attach an appropriate “balancing mass” exactly 1800 opposite to this position.
Fig 2.2.7 Thin Rotor on a knife edge - Illustration of Static Unbalance
Thus we first mount the disc on a knife edge and allow it to freely oscillate. Mark the position when it comes
to rest. Choose a radial location (180 0 opposite to this position) where we can conveniently attach a
balancing mass. By trial and error the balancing mass can be found out. When perfectly balanced, the disc
will exhibit no particular preferred position of rest. Also when the disc is driven to rotate by a motor etc.,
there will be no centrifugal forces felt on the system (for example, at the bearings). Thus the condition for
static balance is simply that the effective centre of gravity lie on the axis.
Consider the rotor shown in Fig. 3.2.8. It is easily observed that mass distribution cannot be approximately
confined to just one plane. So unbalance masses and hence unbalance forces are in general present all
along the length of the rotor. Such a case is known as “dynamic unbalance”.
The fundamental difference between static and dynamic unbalance needs to be clearly appreciated.
When a rotor as shown in Fig. 3.2.8 is mounted on a knife edge and allowed to oscillate freely, it too may
come to rest in one particular position all the time – the position corresponding to the resultant unbalance
mass (centre of gravity) vertically below the knife edge. We could, like earlier, mount an appropriate
balance mass exactly 1800 opposite to this position. It would then have no preferred position of rest when
mounted on a knife-edge. Thus effective center of gravity lies on the axis.
Fig 3.2.9 Example of unbalance masses leading to unbalance force that for a resultant couple because of
axial.
However, when mounted in bearings and driven by a motor etc., it could still wobble due to the unbalanced
moments of these forces as shown in Fig. 3.2.9. This becomes apparent only when the rotor is driven to
rotate and hence the name “dynamic unbalance”. Thus it is not, in general, sufficient to do just static
balance but achieving good dynamic balance is more difficult. We will discuss one important method of
achieving dynamic balance in the next lecture.
Recap
In this lecture you have learnt the following