ICM Proc TK New
ICM Proc TK New
Abstract. We present results concerning the behavior of random walks and di↵usions
on disordered media. Examples treated include fractals and various models of random
graphs, such as percolation clusters, trees generated by branching processes, Erdős-Rényi
random graphs and uniform spanning trees. As a consequence of the inhomogeneity
of the underlying spaces, we observe anomalous behavior of the corresponding random
walks and di↵usions. In this regard, our main interests are in estimating the long time
behavior of the heat kernel and in obtaining a scaling limit of the random walk. We
will overview the research in these areas chronologically, and describe how the techniques
have developed from those introduced for exactly self-similar fractals to the more robust
arguments required for random graphs.
1. Introduction
Since the mid-sixties, mathematical physicists have investigated anomalous behav-
ior of random walks and di↵usions on disordered media (see for example [17]). The
random walk on a percolation cluster – the so-called ‘ant in the labyrinth’ ([24]) – is
one of the central examples. Recall that the bond percolation model on the lattice
Zd , d 2, is defined as follows: each nearest neighbor bond is open with probabil-
ity p 2 [0, 1] and closed otherwise, independently of all the others. It is well-known
that this model exhibits a phase transition, whereby if ✓(p) := Pp (|C(0)| = +1),
where C(0) is the open cluster containing 0, then there exists pc = pc (Zd ) 2 (0, 1)
such that ✓(p) = 0 if p < pc and ✓(p) > 0 if p > pc . For p > pc , there exists
a unique open infinite cluster upon which the long time behavior of the simple
random walk is similar to that of the simple random walk on Zd (see Section 4.1).
For the simple random walk on the critical percolation cluster, however, in 1982
Alexander and Orbach [1] made a striking conjecture about how there might be
quite di↵erent behavior. (To make the problem mathematically precise, one has to
consider the critical percolation cluster conditioned to be infinite, as we discuss in
⇤ Research partially supported by the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A) 25247007.
2 Takashi Kumagai
Section 4.2.) Let Y = {Yn! }n2N be the simple random walk on the cluster (i.e. Yn!
is in one of the adjacent neighbors of Yn! 1 with equal probabilities), and p! n (x, y)
be its heat kernel (transition density); see (3.3) for precise definition. Here and in
the following, the suffix ! stands for the randomness of the media. Define
log p!
2n (x, x)
ds := 2 lim (1.1)
n!1 log n
as the spectral dimension of the cluster if the limit exists. (To be precise, the
original definition of ds was the ‘density of states’, which gives the asymptotic
growth of the eigenvalue counting function.) One formulation of the Alexander-
Orbach conjecture is that ds = 4/3 for all d 2. Clearly, this expresses anomalous
behavior for the random walk, since ds = d for simple random walk on Zd . These
works stimulated a lot of interest from mathematical physicists in exact fractals as
well (see for example [41]).
Mathematical progress on these problems started to be made in the late eighties.
In 1986, Kesten wrote two beautiful papers ([31, 32]) in which he constructed
an ‘incipient infinite cluster’ for critical percolation on Z2 and showed that the
random walk on this was anomalous (in the latter work, he also considered random
walks on critical models of trees); these were the first significant mathematically
rigorous works in this area. Kesten’s work and mathematical physicists’ work
mentioned above triggered intensive research on di↵usions on fractals, which are
“ideal” disordered media. As part of this, Brownian motion was constructed on
typical fractals, such as the Sierpinski gasket, and properties of these processes
were obtained (see Section 2). These included detailed heat kernel estimates of the
so-called sub-Gaussian form, meaning that the heat kernel is bounded from above
and below by
⇣ ⇣ d(x, y)dw ⌘1/(dw 1) ⌘
c1 t ds /2 exp c2
t
with di↵erent pairs of constants (c1 , c2 ) for the upper and lower bounds. Here
dw > 2 is a constant and d(·, ·) is a geodesic distance on the fractal.
While di↵usions on fractals had been extensively studied by 2000 and continue
to be actively studied, the turn of the century saw increasing moves being made
to analyze “fractal-like spaces” instead of working only on ideal fractals. The key
issue here is whether the sub-Gaussian estimates mentioned above are stable under
perturbations of spaces and operators. (Note that when ds = d and dw = 2, the
corresponding estimates are Gaussian estimates, and such a perturbation theory
was extensively developed in the nineties.) In this direction, several functional
inequalities have been shown to be equivalent to the sub-Gaussian estimates, some
of which are stable under perturbations, meaning that the stability problem has
been affirmatively resolved (see Section 3).
It turns out that such a stability theory is useful even for the analysis on ran-
dom media, including percolation clusters as Kesten considered. Indeed, some
functional inequalities have been modified and applied to random walks on var-
ious models of disordered media, especially on percolation clusters (see Section
4). Specifically, the Alexander-Orbach conjecture has been affirmatively solved for
Anomalous random walks and di↵usions: From fractals to random media 3
high dimensions (Theorem 4.4). For some models, scaling limits of random walks
have also been established (see Section 4.1 and Section 5); these include supercrit-
ical percolation clusters, critical branching processes conditioned to be large, the
Erdős-Rényi random graph in the critical window, and the 2-dimensional uniform
spanning tree.
The aim of this paper is to give a overview of the stream of research introduced
above. It is a very restricted survey and the references are far from complete.
Due to space restriction, for papers which are very important but for which details
are not discussed in this paper, names of authors and years of publication are
mentioned but without inclusion in the list of references. We apologize to the
authors of relevant papers which are not cited here. Readers can find more detailed
information in the following books/surveys [5, 7, 17, 19, 23, 25, 27, 29, 33, 34, 36,
38, 39, 42, 44, 45].
Notation. We write f ⇣ g if there exist constants c1 , c2 > 0 such that c1 g(x)
f (x) c2 g(x) for all x, and f ⇠ g if lim|x|!1 f (x)/g(x) = 1.
Then, there exists unique non-void compact set such that K = [3i=1 Fi (K); we call
K the 2-dimensional Sierpinski gasket. Define the unbounded Sierpinski gasket as
K̂ = [1 n
n=0 2 K.
We first explain the construction of Brownian motion on K̂. Let
1
[ ⇣ 3
[ ⌘
V0 = 2m Fi 1 · · · Fim ({a, b, c}) , Vm = 2 m
V0 .
m=0 i1 ,··· ,im =1
of X(i) in V0 (i.e. points in the same triangles with length 1 as those X(i) belongs
to) with equal probabilities. Let Xm (i) := 2 m X(i) be the simple random walk on
Vm . Since Xm moves distance 2 m per unit time, Xm (i) ! 0 as m ! 1 for fixed
i. So, we must speed up the random walks in order to obtain a non-trivial limit.
It is plausible to choose the time scale as the average time for the random walk on
Vm+1 starting from a point in Vm to reach one of the neighboring points in Vm .
By the self-similarity and symmetry of K̂, this average time is independent of m
and it is equal to the average time for X1 starting from a to arrive at either b or c.
(m)
A simple calculation deduces that the value is 5. Let Yt := Xm ([5m t]). Then,
it can be proved that {Y (m) } converges to a non-trivial di↵usion on K̂ as m ! 1,
which is called Brownian motion on K̂. (One can construct Brownian motion on
K similarly.) Brownian motion on the gasket was first constructed by Goldstein
(1987) and Kusuoka (1987) independently. Characterization of Brownian motion
is also known; any self-similar di↵usion process on K̂ whose law is invariant under
local translations and reflections on each small triangle is a constant time change
of this di↵usion ([16]).
The corresponding Laplacian is defined as follows:
⇣ X ⌘
f (x) = lim 5m f (xi ) 4f (x) , x 2 [m 0 Vm \ {0},
m!1
m
xi : x⇠xi
m
for f in a suitable function space, where x ⇠ y means that x and y are adja-
cent in Vm . Note that the standard approximation for the Laplacian on R is
f (x) = limm!1 22m (f (x + 2 m ) + f (x 2 m ) 2f (x)) for f 2 C 2 (R). Set
dw = log 5/ log 2 so that 5 = 2dw . Naively, we can say that the Laplacian on the
gasket is a “di↵erential operator of order dw ”. (One way of stating this rigor-
ously is that the domain of the corresponding Dirichlet form on the gasket is a
Besov space of order dw /2 (Jonsson (1996), Grigor’yan-Hu-Lau (2003)).) Kigami
(1989) was the first to construct the Laplacian on the gasket directly. It turns out
that the theory of Dirichlet forms ([23]) is well-applicable to this area, and di↵u-
sions (self-adjoint operators) on fractals have been constructed through Dirichlet
forms systematically. Fukushima-Shima (1992) is one of the first who applied the
Dirichlet form theory to fractals.
On Rd , we can define K̂ similarly from the family of (d+1)-th contraction maps
with contraction rate 1/2. (For d = 1, K̂ = [0, 1).) The Hausdor↵ dimension of
the d-dimensional gasket is df = log(d + 1)/ log 2. The time scaling is d + 3 and
dw = log(d + 3)/ log 2.
In order to understand the asymptotic properties of the process, it is very
important and useful to obtain detailed heat kernel estimates. Let {B(t)}t 0 be
Brownian motion on the gasket and define
Z
x
Pt f (x) = E [f (B(t))] = pt (x, y)f (y)µ(dy),
K̂
where µ is the normalized Hausdor↵ measure on K̂. {Pt }t 0 is the semigroup and
pt (·, ·) is the heat kernel (transition density) for Brownian motion on K̂. pt (·, ·)
Anomalous random walks and di↵usions: From fractals to random media 5
is a fundamental solution of the heat equation for the Laplacian. For the case of
Brownian motion on Rd , pt (x, y) is the Gauss-kernel (2⇡t)
1
d/2 exp( |x y|2 /(2t)).
Let d(x, y) be the shortest distance between x and y in K̂. The following
sub-Gaussian heat kernel estimates are obtained by Barlow-Perkins [16].
Theorem 2.1. pt (x, y) obeys the following estimates for t > 0, x, y 2 K̂:
⇣ ⇣ d(x, y)dw ⌘1/(dw 1) ⌘
df /dw
c1 t exp c2 pt (x, y)
t
⇣ ⇣ d(x, y)dw ⌘1/(dw 1) ⌘
df /dw
c3 t exp c4 . (2.1)
t
The simple random walk on V0 also obeys (2.1) for d(x, y) t 2 N (Jones (1996)).
From the probabilistic viewpoint, dw is the order of the di↵usion speed of par-
ticles and it is called the walk dimension. Indeed, by integrating (2.1), we have
c5 t1/dw E x [d(x, B(t))] c6 t1/dw . As dw > 2, the behavior of the process is
anomalous (for a long time, it di↵uses slower than Brownian motion on Rd , so the
behavior is sub-di↵usive). This di↵usion does not have finite quadratic variation,
so it is not a semi-martingale ([16]). Its martingale dimension is 1 (Kusuoka (1989),
Hino (2008)). Set ds /2 = df /dw . This ds , which is the same exponent as in (1.1),
gives the asymptotic growth of the eigenvalue counting function for the Laplacian
on K, and it is called the spectral dimension. Spectral properties of the Laplacian
have been extensively studied (Fukushima-Shima (1992), Kigami-Lapidus (1993),
Barlow-Kigami (1997), Teplyaev (1998), etc.). Unlike the Euclidean case, Brown-
ian motion and the Laplacian on the gasket exhibit oscillations in their asymptotics;
in the asymptotics of the eigenvalue counting function (Barlow-Kigami (1997)), in
the on-diagonal heat kernel asymptotics (Grabner-Woess (1997), Kajino (2013)),
and in Schilder’s large-deviation principle (Ben Arous-Kumagai (2000)).
(2.1) is a very useful estimate. Various properties of Brownian motion such as
laws of the iterated logarithm can be deduced from this estimate. It also implies
nice regularity properties of caloric functions u(t, x) (i.e. solutions of the heat
equation @u @t = u). For S, R 2 (0, 1), x0 2 K̂, set
In fact, (2.1) and (PHI(dw )) are equivalent under a suitable volume growth
condition as we will see in the next section. (PHI(dw )) implies various regularity
properties of harmonic functions such as the elliptic Harnack inequalities and the
Liouville property (i.e. if u is a non-negative harmonic function on K̂, then u is a
constant function).
For more general fractals such as nested fractals introduced by Lindstrøm
(1990) and Sierpinski carpets (see Figure 2, the left figure is an example of nested
fractals), Brownian motion is constructed and it is known that the heat ker-
nels obey the sub-Gaussian estimates (2.1) (Barlow-Bass (1989, 1999), Lindstrøm
(1990), Kumagai (1993), Fitzsimmons-Hambly-Kumagai (1994)). Characteriza-
tion of Brownian motion on the fractals are also known (Metz (1996), Sabot (1997),
Barlow-Bass-Kumagai-Teplyaev (2010)).
Open problem I: The existing construction of Brownian motion on the carpet
requires detailed uniform control of harmonic functions (such as uniform Harnack
inequalities) for the approximating processes; see for example [7]. Construct Brow-
nian motion on the carpet without such detailed information.
We refer to [5, 7, 33, 34, 38, 44] for details on di↵usions/analysis on fractals.
(1986) proved the remarkable fact that if M has non-negative Ricci curvature, then
the heat kernel pt (x, y) satisfies
where (x, r, t) = µ(B(x, t1/2 )) 1 exp( r2 /t). A few years later, Grigor’yan (1991)
and Salo↵-Coste (1992) refined the result and proved, in conjunction with the re-
sults by Fabes-Stroock (1986) and Kusuoka-Stroock (1987), that (3.1) is equivalent
to a volume doubling condition (VD) plus Poincaré inequalities (PI(2)) –see Def-
inition 3.1 and 3.3 for definitions in the graph setting. Their results were later
extended to the framework of Dirichlet forms by Sturm (1996) and graphs by Del-
motte (1999). Detailed heat kernel estimates are strongly related to the control of
harmonic functions. The origin of ideas and techniques used in this field goes back
to De Giorgi (1957), Nash (1958), Moser (1961,1964) and there are many other
significant works in this area. See for example [25, 42] and the references therein.
Summarizing, the following equivalence holds:
Since (VD) and (PI(2)) are stable under some perturbations, we see that (3.1) and
(PHI(2)) are also stable under the perturbations.
We will discuss the extension of (3.2) to the dw > 2 case. Though such a
generalization has also been established under a metric measure space with a local
regular Dirichlet form, for simplicity, we will restrict our attention to the graph
setting. We first set up notation and definitions.
1 X
E(f, g) = (f (x) f (y))(g(x) g(y))µxy for all f, g 2 RG .
2 x,y2G
x⇠y
P P
For each x 2 G, let µx = y2G µxy and for each A ⇢ G, set µ(A) = x2A µx .
µ is a measure on G. Let {Yn }n 0 be the discrete time Markov chain whose
transition probabilities are given by
µxy
P (Yn+1 = y|Yn = x) = =: P (x, y) for all x, y 2 G.
µx
8 Takashi Kumagai
where we set P x (·) := P (·|Y0 = x). Clearly, pn (x, y) = pn (y, x). We sometimes
consider a continuous time Markov chain {Yt }t 0 with respect to µ which is defined
as follows: each particle stays at a point, say x for (independent) exponential time
with parameter 1, and then jumps to another point, say y with probability P (x, y).
The heat kernel for the continuous time Markov chain can be expressed as follows.
1
X n
tt
pt (x, y) = P x (Yt = y)/µy = e pn (x, y) for all x, y 2 G.
n=0
n!
X 1 X⇣ ⌘
Lf (x) = P (x, y)f (y) f (x) = f (y) f (x) µxy .
y2G
µx y2G
y⇠x y⇠x
(ii) We say (G, µ) satisfies a volume doubling condition (VD) if there exists c1 > 1
such that
where di (·, ·) is the the graph distance of (Gi , µi ), for i = 1, 2. (G1 , µ1 ), (G2 , µ2 )
are said to be rough isometric if there is a rough isometry between them.
The notion of rough isometry was first introduced by Kanai (1985). Note that
rough isometry corresponds to (coarse) quasi-isometry in the field of geometric
group theory, which was introduced by Gromov (1981).
We now define some (functional) inequalities.
Anomalous random walks and di↵usions: From fractals to random media 9
Definition 3.3. Let (G, µ) be a weighted graph with controlled weights and let
> 1.
(i) We say (G, µ) satisfies sub-Gaussian heat kernel estimates (HK( )) if there
exist c1 , · · · , c4 > 0 such that for x, y 2 G, n d(x, y) _ 1, the following holds:
c1 ⇣ ⇣ d(x, y) ⌘1/( 1) ⌘
pn (x, y) 1/
exp c2 ,
µ(B(x, n )) n
c3 ⇣ ⇣ d(x, y) ⌘1/( 1) ⌘
pn (x, y) + pn+1 (x, y) exp c4 .
µ(B(x, n1/ )) n
(ii) We say (G, µ) satisfies (PI( )), a scaled Poincaré inequality with exponent ,
if there exists a constant c1 > 0 such that for any ball BR := B(x0 , R) ⇢ G with
x0 2 G, R 1 and f : BR ! R,
X X
(f (x) f¯B )2 µx c1 R
R
(f, f )(x).
x2BR x2BR
P P
Here f¯BR := µ(BR ) 1 y2BR f (y)µy , and (f, f )(x) := y⇠x (f (x) f (y))2 µxy .
(iii) We say (G, µ) satisfies (CSA( )), a cut-o↵ Sobolev inequality in annuli with
exponent , if there exist a constant c1 > 0 such that for every x0 2 G, R, r 1,
there exists a cut-o↵ function ' satisfying the following properties:
c
(a) '(x) = 1 if x 2 BR , '(x) = 0 if x 2 BR+r .
(b) Let U = BR+r \ BR . For any f : U ! R,
X ⇣X X ⌘
f (x)2 (', ')(x) c1 '(x)2 (f, f )(x) + r f (x)2 µx .
x2U x2U x2U
Theorem 3.4 ([2, 8, 9]). Let (G, µ) be a weighted graph with controlled weights.
Then,
Here and in the following, (PHI( )) means the discrete version of (PHI(dw )) in
Theorem 2.2 with dw = .
Remark 3.5. (i) There are various other equivalent conditions to (3.5); see [26, 45]
and references therein.
(ii) When one of (thus all) the above conditions holds, then it turns out that 2.
(iii) (CSA(2)) always holds in the graph context. (Take '(x) = 1^r 1 d(x, BR+r c
).)
Thus Theorem 3.4 is an extension of (3.2) to the cases of > 2 for graphs.
(iv) The main theorem in [2] is the equivalence of the upper bound of (HK( ))
and (CSA( )) plus the Faber-Krahn inequality with exponent . The results are
stated on metric measure spaces.
we adopt similar arguments using the Lipschitz cut-o↵ functions for the > 2
case, then the estimates obtained are not sharp enough to establish the Harnack
inequality. Roughly speaking, (CSA( )) guarantees the existence of nice cut-o↵
functions ' that satisfy E(', ') c1 R µ(BR ). (Note that the order of the energy
for the Lipschitz continuous cut-o↵ function is R 2 µ(BR ).) The idea of the proof
of the Harnack inequality when > 2 is to apply Moser’s iteration for weighted
measures ⌫x := µx + R (', ')(x) using (CSA( )).
Clearly, (VD), (PI( )) and (CSA( )) are stable under bounded perturbations.
Further, it can be proved that they are stable under rough isometry (Hambly-
Kumagai (2004)). We thus obtain the stability of (PHI( )) and (HK( )).
As mentioned above, Theorem 3.4 holds in the framework of metric measure
spaces with local regular Dirichlet forms (especially Riemannian manifolds). It
also holds when the walk dimension is di↵erent for short times and long times.
Figure 3 is a 2-dimensional Riemannian manifold whose global structure is like
that of the gasket. This can be constructed from the left of Figure 1 by changing
each bond to a cylinder and putting projections and dents locally. The di↵usion
corresponding to the Dirichlet form moves on the surfaces of the cylinders. Using
the generalization
P2 of Theorem 3.4, one can show that any divergence operator
@ @
L = i,j=1 @xi (aij (x) @x j
) on the manifold which satisfies the uniform elliptic
condition obeys (PHI(2)) for R 1 and (PHI(log 5/ log 2)) for R 1.
3.3. Strongly recurrent case. The problem with Theorem 3.4 is that it
is in general very difficult to check (CSA( )). Under a stronger volume growth
condition, a simpler equivalent condition is known.
For each x 6= y 2 G, define the e↵ective resistance between them by
n o
Re↵ (x, y) 1 = inf E(f, f ) : f (x) = 1, f (y) = 0, f 2 RG . (3.6)
(ii) We say (G, µ) satisfies (RE( )), the e↵ective resistance bounds with exponent
, if there exist c1 , c2 > 0 such that
c1 d(x, y) c2 d(x, y)
Re↵ (x, y) for all x, y 2 G.
µ(B(x, d(x, y))) µ(B(x, d(x, y)))
Theorem 3.7. ([10]) Let (G, µ) be a weighted graph with controlled weights and
assume (VG( )). Then,
(RE( )) , (PHI( )) , (HK( )).
Under the above conditions, the Markov chain is strongly recurrent in the sense
that there exists p1 > 0 such that P x ( {y} < B(x,2r)c ) p1 for all x 2 G, r 1
and y 2 B(x, r), where A = min{n 0 : Yn 2 A}. Theorem 3.7 is also generalized
to the framework of metric measure spaces (Kigami ([34]), Kumagai (2004)).
One can refine the proof of this theorem to a statement which is applicable for
random media as we discuss in the next section.
Open problem II: Provide a simpler equivalent condition to (HK( )) that is
applicable to a general graph.
The proof uses (3.2) in spirit. A ball B(x, r) is said to be “good” if the volume
is comparable to rd and (PI(2)) holds for the ball. It is proved that a ball is
good with high probability and the Borel-Cantelli lemma is used to establish some
quenched estimates. Part of the proof of (3.2) is used to establish some heat kernel
estimates on good balls.
As for (Q2), it turns out that the quenched invariance principle holds, namely
2 converges as " ! 0 to Brownian motion on R
! d
"Yt/" (with covariance 2 I, > 0)
P0 -a.e. !. This was first proved in [43] for d 4 and later extended to all d 2
in [18, 40]. The proof for d 3 uses Theorem 4.1.
Theorem 4.2. P0 -a.s., "Yt/"2 converges (under P!0 ) in law to Brownian motion
on Rd with covariance 2 I where > 0 is a non-random constant.
Furthermore, the quenched local limit theorem holds for this model ([12]).
Let us emphasize that percolation provides one of the natural degenerate models
in the sense that uniform ellipticity does not hold, and it is a highly non-trivial fact
that the scaling limit is Brownian motion with probability one. For the random
conductance model discussed below, when Eµe < 1, a weak form of convergence
was already proved in the 1980s that the convergence holds in law under P0 ⇥ P!0 ;
a milestone by Kipnis-Varadhan (1986). (See also De Masi-Ferrari-Goldstein-Wick
(1989) and Kozlov (1985).) This is sometimes referred to as the annealed (or
averaged) invariance principle. It took about two decades to improve the annealed
invariance principle to the quenched one.
Remark 4.3. More generally, (Q1) and (Q2) have been extensively studied on
the random conductance model. Let {µe : e 2 Ed } be stationary ergodic that
takes non-negative values, and assume P(µe > 0) > pc (Zd ). Then there exists a
unique infinite connected component of edges with positive conductance, which we
denote by G(!). The random weighted graph (G, µ) is the random conductance
model. For the i.i.d. case, although there are examples where the heat kernel
behaves anomalously (Berger-Biskup-Ho↵man-Kozma (2008)), it is proved that
quenched invariance principle as in Theorem 4.2 holds; further, > 0 is non-
random if Eµe < 1 and = 0 (i.e. the limiting process does not move) if Eµe =
1 (Biskup-Prescott (2007), Mathieu-Piatnitski (2007), Barlow-Deuschel (2010),
Andres-Barlow-Deuschel-Hambly (2013)). When P(µe u) ⇠ u ↵ as u ! 1 for
↵ 2 (0, 1), a special case of Eµe = 1, a suitably rescaled Markov chain converges
to an anomalous process. It converges to the Fractional-Kinetics (FK) process
when d 2, where the corresponding heat kernel obeys a fractional time heat
equation, and to the Fontes-Isopi-Newman (FIN) di↵usion when d = 1 (Barlow-
Černý (2011), Černý (2011)). See [19, 36] for details. For general ergodic media
with P(0 < µe < 1) = 1, Andres-Deuschel-Slowik ([3]) has proved the quenched
invariance principle under some integrability condition of the media. They use
Moser’s iteration instead of the heat kernel estimates. See Procaccia-Rosenthal-
Sapozhnikov (2013) for the quenched invariance principle on a class of degenerate
ergodic media such as random interlacements.
Anomalous random walks and di↵usions: From fractals to random media 13
where {0 $ x} is the event that 0 and x are in the same open cluster. In the
following, we will write G = Gd (!) for the IIC in Zd . It is believed that the global
properties of G are the same for all d > dc , both for nearest neighbor and spread-out
models, where dc is the critical dimension which is 6 for the percolation model.
Let Y = {Yn! }n2N be simple random walk on G, and p! n (x, y) be its heat kernel.
The Alexander-Orbach conjecture mentioned in the introduction can be stated as
follows: for any d 2, ds (G) = 4/3, PIIC -a.e., where ds was defined in (1.1).
The Alexander-Orbach conjecture turns out to be true on a high dimensional
percolation cluster ([35]) as we state in the following.
Theorem 4.4. There exists ↵ > 0 such that the following holds when d > 6 for
the spread-out model (d 19 for the nearest neighbor model): For PIIC -a.e. ! 2 ⌦
and x 2 G(!), there exist Nx (!), Rx (!) 2 N such that
2 2
↵
(log n) n 3 p! ↵
2n (x, x) (log n) n
3 for all n Nx (!), (4.3)
↵ 3
(log R) R E!x ⌧B(0,R) ↵
(log R) R 3
for all R Rx (!), (4.4)
where ⌧A := min{n 0 : Yn 2
/ A}.
In the next subsection, we will briefly discuss how this was proved.
0 2 G(!). For each !, we put conductance 1 for each bond and let {Yn! } be the
simple random walk on G. Let B(0, R) be the ball of radius R centered at 0 with
respect to the graph distance d(·, ·). For D, 1, we say B(0, R) in G is -good if
RD R
µ(B(0, R)) RD , Re↵ (0, B(0, R)c ). (4.5)
Here Re↵ (·, ·) is the e↵ective resistance defined in (3.6). The following are the
general estimates in [13, 37].
Theorem 4.5. If there exist R0 , 0 1 and q0 > 0 such that
q0
P({! : B(0, R) is -good }) 1 for all R R0 , 0, (4.6)
then there exists c > 0 such that the following holds:
For P-a.e. ! 2 ⌦ and x 2 G(!), there exist Nx (!), Rx (!) 2 N such that
D D
c
(log n) n D+1 p! c
2n (x, x) (log n) n
D+1 for all n Nx (!), (4.7)
c D+1
(log R) R E!x ⌧B(0,R) c
(log R) R D+1
for all R Rx (!). (4.8)
2D
In particular, ds (G(!)) = D+1 , P–a.s. !, and the random walk is recurrent.
Furthermore, if (4.6) holds with exp( c1 q0 ) instead of q0
, then (4.7) and
±c ±c
(4.8) hold with (log log ·) instead of (log ·) .
In the above statement, the volume growth is of order RD and the resis-
tance growth is linear. In [37], a general version is given where both growths
are controlled by increasing functions with c1 (R/r) 1 f (R)/f (r) c2 (R/r) 2
for 0 < r < R, where 0 < 1 2 are constants. For this general version, we need
to add an extra condition Re↵ (0, z) f (d(0, z)) for all z 2 B(0, R) in (4.5). Note
that this extra condition is always true for the linear case.
Open problem III: Provide a simpler sufficient condition for the heat kernel
and exit time estimates for ds 2.
(iv) IIC for ↵-stable Galton-Watson trees conditioned to survive forever (Croydon-
Kumagai (2008)): D = ↵/(↵ 1) and ds = 2↵/(2↵ 1).
(v) 2-dimensional uniform spanning trees ([15]): D = 8/5 and ds = 16/13 – See
Section 5.2 for details.
[28] partly generalized the results in [35], and proved the Alexander-Orbach con-
jecture for the IIC in high dimensions, both for long-range and finite-range perco-
lation.
For the model (i), we have much more detailed estimates ([14]).
Theorem 4.7. The heat kernel of simple random walk on the IIC for critical
percolation on the regular tree obeys the following estimates.
(i) (4.3) and (4.4) hold with (log log ·)±↵ instead of (log ·)±↵ .
(ii) It holds that for PIIC -a.e. !
(iii) The annealed heat kernel EIIC [p·2n (x, y)|x, y 2 G] obeys the sub-Gaussian esti-
mates (2.1) with df = 2, dw = 3 for n d(x, y) _ 1.
As we have seen above, the quenched estimates have oscillation of log log order
whereas the annealed estimates do not. Detailed o↵-diagonal heat kernel estimates
(which hold with high probability) are also obtained in [14, Theorem 4.9, 4.10].
4.2.3. Below critical dimensions. For low dimensions, there are only a few
rigorous results.
One of the most attractive models is the IIC for 2-dimensional critical perco-
lation. In [32], Kesten proves sub-di↵usive behavior of simple random walk on the
IIC for 2-dimensional critical percolation cluster (also shows the existence of the
IIC in [31]). Namely, let {Yn! }n 0 be a simple random walk on the IIC, then there
1
exists ✏ > 0 such that the PIIC -distribution of n 2 +✏ d(0, Yn ) is tight. A quenched
version of Kesten’s result is established both for the IIC and the invasion perco-
lation cluster (Damron-Hanson-Sosoe (2013)). For bond percolation on Zd , the
critical dimension is 6. The Alexander-Orbach conjecture is considered to be false
for d 5 and some numerical simulations (cf. [17], [29, Section 7.4]) support this.
It is a challenging problem to prove this rigorously, especially for d = 2.
It is proved in [30] that the e↵ective resistance between the origin and generation
n of the incipient infinite oriented branching random walk in d < 6 is O(n1 ) for
some > 0. It is interesting to see that, while the critical dimension of the model is
4, asymptotic behavior of the random walk changes already at d = 5. The precise
resistance exponent (even its existence) is not known.
16 Takashi Kumagai
Other low dimensional random media for which heat kernel/exit time estimates
have been studied include the uniform infinite planar triangulation (Benjamini-
Curien (2013); see also Gurel-Gurevich and Nachmias (2013)), the critical per-
colation cluster for the diamond lattice (Hambly-Kumagai (2010)), and the non-
intersecting two-sided random walk trace on Z2 and Z3 (Shiraishi (2014+)). See
[36, Section 7.4] for details.
Open problems IV: (i) Prove the existence of ds and dw for lower dimensional
models. Disprove (or prove) the Alexander-Orbach conjecture for the models.
(ii) Compute resistance for random media when the resistance growth is not linear.
Remark 4.8. Heat kernel estimates and scaling limits have been considered for
random walks on the long-range percolation model and its variants. See [20, 21]
and references therein.
We will consider finer scaling (the so-called critical window), namely we will
take p = 1/N + N 4/3 for fixed 2 R. In this window, the size of the i-th largest
connected component is of order N 2/3 for each i 2 N. The following results hold
for each i-th largest connected component; for simplicity, we state them for the
CN .
There exists a random compact metric space M = M such that the following
holds in the Gromov-Hausdor↵ sense
1/3 N d
N C ! M,
Theorem 5.1 ([22]). (i) There exist Brownian motion {BtM }t 0 on M such that
1/3 CN d
{N Y[N t] }t 0 ! {BtM }t 0, P a.s.
(ii) There exist a jointly continuous heat kernel pM t (·, ·) of Brownian motion and
✓, T0 , c1 , · · · , c4 > 0 such that for P-a.e. ! 2 ⌦,
( ✓ ◆ 1 ✓ ◆ ✓)
df
d(x, y)dw dw 1 d(x, y)
pM
t (x, y) c1 t dw 1 ✓
`(t ) exp c2 ` (5.1)
t t
( ✓ ◆ 1 ✓ ◆✓ )
M
df
1 ✓ d(x, y)dw dw 1 d(x, y)
pt (x, y) c3 t w `(t ) exp
d c4 ` (5.2)
t t
Note that the exponent 13/4 = (5/4) · dw above is the walk dimension with respect
to the Euclidean distance.
6. Conclusions
We have provided an overview of the stream of research on anomalous random
walks and di↵usions. Through the detailed study of di↵usions on exactly self-
similar fractals, it became apparent that Brownian motion on fractals typically
obeys sub-Gaussian heat kernel estimates. This motivated the development of sta-
bility theory for such anomalous di↵usions/random walks which is a generalization
of the classical perturbation theory of Gaussian bounds. Then, some of the results
in this direction turned out to be useful in analyzing random walks in random
media. Although not discussed in this paper, such a stability theory also gives
new insights to analysis on metric measure spaces.
There are many interesting random media whose dynamical properties are not
yet known. Necessity is the Mother of Invention. We believe that further develop-
ments will continue to lead to important interactions between probability, analysis
and mathematical physics.
References
[1] Alexander, S., Orbach, R., Density of states on fractals: “fractons”, J. Physique
(Paris) Lett. 43 (1982), L625–L631.
[2] Andres, S., Barlow, M.T., Energy inequalities for cuto↵ functions and some applica-
tions, J. reine angew. Math., to appear.
[3] Andres, S., Deuschel, J.-D., Slowik, M., Invariance principle for the random conduc-
tance model in a degenerate ergodic environment, Ann. Probab., to appear.
[4] Angel, O., Goodman, J., den Hollander, F., Slade, G., Invasion percolation on regular
trees, Ann. Probab. 36 (2008), 420–466.
Anomalous random walks and di↵usions: From fractals to random media 19
[5] Barlow, M.T., Di↵usions on fractals. Lect. Notes in Math. 1690, Springer, New York,
1998.
[6] , Random walks on supercritical percolation clusters, Ann. Probab. 32 (2004),
3024-3084.
[7] , Analysis on the Sierpinski carpet. Analysis and geometry of metric measure
spaces, 27–53, CRM Proc. Lect. Notes 56, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2013.
[8] Barlow, M.T., Bass, R.F., Stability of parabolic Harnack inequalities, Trans. Amer.
Math. Soc. 356 (2003), 1501–1533.
[9] Barlow M.T., Bass, R.F., Kumagai, T., Stability of parabolic Harnack inequalities on
measure metric spaces, J. Math. Soc. Japan 58 (2006), 485–519.
[10] Barlow, M.T., Coulhon, T., Kumagai, T., Characterization of sub-Gaussian heat
kernel estimates on strongly recurrent graphs, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 58 (2005),
1642–1677.
[11] Barlow, M.T., Croydon, D., Kumagai, T., Subsequential scaling limits of simple
random walk on the two-dimensional uniform spanning tree, in preparation.
[12] Barlow, M.T., Hambly, B.M., Parabolic Harnack inequality and local limit theorem
for random walks on percolation clusters, Electron. J. Probab. 14 (2009), 1–27.
[13] Barlow, M.T., Járai, A.A., Kumagai, T., Slade, G., Random walk on the incipient
infinite cluster for oriented percolation in high dimensions, Comm. Math. Phys. 278
(2008), 385–431.
[14] Barlow, M.T., Kumagai, T., Random walk on the incipient infinite cluster on trees,
Illinois J. Math. 50 (2006), 33–65.
[15] Barlow, M.T., Masson, R., Spectral dimension and random walks on the two dimen-
sional uniform spanning tree, Comm. Math. Phys. 305 (2011), 23–57.
[16] Barlow, M.T., Perkins, E.A., Brownian motion on the Sierpiński gasket, Probab.
Theory Relat. Fields 79 (1988), 543–623.
[17] Ben-Avraham, D., Havlin, S., Di↵usion and reactions in fractals and disordered
systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000.
[18] Berger, N., Biskup, M., Quenched invariance principle for simple random walk on
percolation clusters, Probab. Theory Relat. Fields 137 (2007), 83–120.
[19] Biskup, M., Recent progress on the random conductance model, Probability Surveys
8 (2011), 294–373.
[20] Chen, Z.-Q., Kim, P., Kumagai, T., Discrete approximation of symmetric jump
processes on metric measure spaces, Probab. Theory Relat. Fields 155 (2013), 703–
749.
[21] Crawford, N., Sly, A., Simple random walks on long range percolation clusters
I: heat kernel bounds, Probab. Theory Relat. Fields 154 (2012), 753–786.
II: scaling limits, Ann. Probab. 41 (2013), 445–502.
[22] Croydon, D.A., Scaling limit for the random walk on the largest connected compo-
nent of the critical random graph, Publ. RIMS. Kyoto Univ. 48 (2012), 279–338.
[23] Fukushima, M., Oshima, Y., Takeda, M., Dirichlet forms and symmetric Markov
processes. de Gruyter, Berlin, 2011 (2nd Edition).
[24] De Gennes, P.G., La percolation: un concept unificateur, La Recherche 7 (1976),
919–927.
20 Takashi Kumagai
[25] Grigor’yan, A., Heat kernel and analysis on manifolds. Amer. Math. Soc., Provi-
dence, RI; International Press, Boston, MA, 2009.
[26] Grigor’yan, A., Telcs, A., Two-sided estimates of heat kernels on metric measure
spaces, Ann. Probab. 40 (2012), 1212–1284.
[27] Grimmett, G., Percolation. Springer, Berlin, 1999 (2nd Edition).
[28] Heydenreich, M., van der Hofstad, R., Hulshof, T., Random walk on the high-
dimensional IIC, Comm. Math. Phys., to appear.
[29] Hughes, B.D., Random walks and random environments, volume 2: random envi-
ronments. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1996.
[30] Járai, A.A., Nachmias, A., Electrical resistance of the low dimensional critical
branching random walk, ArXiv:1305.1092.
[31] Kesten, H., The incipient infinite cluster in two-dimensional percolation, Probab.
Theory Relat. Fields 73 (1986), 369–394.
[32] , Subdi↵usive behavior of random walk on a random cluster, Ann. Inst. H.
Poincaré Probab. Statist. 22 (1986), 425–487.
[33] Kigami, J., Analysis on fractals. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2001.
[34] , Resistance forms, quasisymmetric maps and heat kernel estimates, Mem.
Amer. Math. Soc. 216 (2012), no. 1015.
[35] Kozma, G., Nachmias, A., The Alexander-Orbach conjecture holds in high dimen-
sions, Invent. Math. 178 (2009), 635–654.
[36] Kumagai, T., Random walks on disordered media and their scaling limits. Lect. Notes
in Math. 2101, Springer, New York, 2014.
[37] Kumagai, T., Misumi, J., Heat kernel estimates for strongly recurrent random walk
on random media, J. Theoret. Probab. 21 (2008), 910–935.
[38] Kusuoka, S., Di↵usion processes on nested fractals. Lect. Notes in Math. 1567,
Springer, New York, 1993.
[39] Lyons, R., Peres, Y., Probability on trees and networks. Cambridge University Press,
in preparation. Current version available at http://mypage.iu.edu/~rdlyons/.
[40] Mathieu, P., Piatnitski, A., Quenched invariance principles for random walks on
percolation clusters, Proc. Roy. Soc. A 463 (2007), 2287-2307.
[41] Rammal, R., Toulouse, G., Random walks on fractal structures and percolation
clusters, J. Physique Lettres 44 (1983), L13–L22.
[42] Salo↵-Coste, L., Aspects of Sobolev-type inequalities. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cam-
bridge, 2002.
[43] Sidoravicius, V., Sznitman, A.-S., Quenched invariance principles for walks on clus-
ters of percolation or among random conductances, Probab. Theory Relat. Fields 129
(2004), 219–244.
[44] Strichartz, R.S., Di↵erential equations on fractals: a tutorial. Princeton University
Press, Princeton, NJ, 2006.
[45] Telcs, A., The art of random walks. Lect. Notes in Math. 1885, Springer, New York,
2006.