Criteria Excellent (10-9) Good (8-7) Fair (6-5) UNSATIFACTORY (4)

Background of Provides a comprehensive and well-organized Provides a good review of Provides a basic review of No background
review of relevant literature, theories, and relevant literature and theories, literature and theories but information is provided.
the Study
concepts. Demonstrates a deep but may lack some depth or lacks depth, organization, or
understanding of the subject matter and organization in some areas. relevance in some areas.
effectively sets the context for the study.
Statement of The research question is clear, concise, and The research question is clear and The research question is No research question is
well-formulated. It demonstrates a strong relevant, but it may lack some somewhat clear, but it lacks provided
the Problem
understanding of the topic and is highly specificity or depth. specificity or relevance to
relevant to the field of study. the field.
Significance of Clearly articulates the significance and Articulates the significance and Articulates the significance No significance of the
importance of the research in addressing a importance of the research but of the research but lacks study is provided.
the Study
gap or problem in the field. Provides a strong may lack some depth or clarity in depth or a clear rationale.
rationale for the study. the rationale.
Scope and Clearly defines the boundaries and limitations Defines the scope and Defines the scope and No scope and delimitation
of the study. Demonstrates an understanding delimitation, but there may be delimitation, but lacks clarity are provided.
Delimitation
of what is included and excluded from the minor issues with clarity or or may include irrelevant
research. completeness. information.
Submission of Submitted on or before the deadline; well- Submitted on the deadline with Submitted 1-2 days late with Submitted more than 2
organized and complete minimal issues or missing notable omissions or days late or incomplete;
Research
elements incomplete sections fails to meet expectations
Paper
Formatting The paper follows the specified formatting The paper mostly follows The paper partially follows The paper is entirely
guidelines (e.g., APA, MLA) accurately and formatting guidelines but may
formatting guidelines and unformatted and riddled
and Grammar
consistently. Grammar, spelling, and have minor issues. Grammar, may have noticeable issues. with grammar, spelling,
punctuation are impeccable, with no errors. spelling, and punctuation are
Grammar, spelling, and and punctuation errors.
mostly correct, with few errors.
punctuation contain several
errors.
PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2: QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH
RUBRIC for Chapter 1 : INTRODUCTION

CHAPTER 1 SCORE EQUIVALENT LEGEND:

Background of the Study EQUIVALENT-

Statement of the Problem 50 - 42 = VERY GOOD

Significance of the Study 41 – 33 = GOOD
Scope and Delimitation 32 - 24 = FAIR
23 - 20 = UNSATISFACTORY
Submission of Research Paper
Formatting and Grammar
TOTAL

The leader has the authority to deduct points from the scores of group members, including themselves, if they fail to contribute or meet expectations.
5-point deduction: For members (or the leader) who fail to meet the expected output on time or with quality below the agreed standard.15-point deduction: For
members (or the leader) who completely fail to fulfill their assigned tasks or responsibilities in the research paper. Any deductions must be discussed and agreed upon
by the group, and proper documentation should be submitted to justify the deductions (e.g., a log of contributions, minutes of meetings, or progress reports). Final
deductions are subject to the teacher’s review to ensure fairness and prevent misuse of authority by the leader.
GROUP:________ RESEARCH TITLE:________________________________________________
SECTION:___________________________________
LEADER:_______________________________ Asst. Leader:________________________________
MEMBERS:
______________________________________ _______________________________________
______________________________________ _______________________________________
______________________________________ _______________________________________
______________________________________ _______________________________________
DEOMEL I. CABALLERO
Research Teacher
Criteria Excellent (10-9) Good (8-7) Fair (6-5) UNSATIFACTORY
(4)
Related Includes a comprehensive and well- Includes a good review of 25 relevant Includes fewer than 25 literature No Related Literature is
organized review of 25 relevant literature literature sources, with only minor sources or the review is limited and provided.
Literature sources. Demonstrates a thorough issues in terms of depth or organization. poorly organized.
understanding of existing research.
Conceptual Clearly presents and explains the Presents and explains the conceptual Presents a conceptual framework No Conceptual
conceptual framework used to guide the framework, but there may be minor but lacks clarity or depth, or the Framework is provided
Framework study. The choice and application of the issues with clarity or depth. The choice choice and application of the
 conceptual framework are exemplary. and application of the conceptual framework may be somewhat
framework are sound. unclear.
Hypothesis Clearly states the research hypothesis or States the research hypothesis or States the hypothesis or No Hypothesis are
hypotheses, with a strong link to the hypotheses, with a clear link to the hypotheses but may lack some provided.
research question and theory. The research question and theory. The clarity, specificity, or a clear link to
hypotheses are testable and well- hypotheses are testable and well- the research question and theory.
formulated. formed, with minor room for
improvement.
Definition Provides a clear and comprehensive Provides clear definitions of key terms Provides basic definitions but lacks No Definition of terms
definition of key terms and concepts used and concepts but may lack some depth depth, organization, or relevance in provided.
of Terms in the study. Definitions are well-organized or organization in some areas. some areas.
and relevant.
Submission of Submitted on or before the deadline; well- Submitted on the deadline with minimal Submitted 1-2 days late with Submitted more than 2
Research organized and complete issues or missing elements notable omissions or incomplete days late or incomplete;
Paper sections fails to meet
expectations
Format and The chapter follows the specified The chapter mostly follows formatting The chapter partially follows The paper is entirely
formatting guidelines (APA format) guidelines but may have minor issues. formatting guidelines and may have unformatted and riddled
Grammar accurately and consistently. Grammar, Grammar, spelling, and punctuation are noticeable issues. Grammar, with grammar, spelling,
spelling, and punctuation are impeccable, mostly correct, with few errors. spelling, and punctuation contain and punctuation errors.
with no errors. several errors.

PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2: QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH

RUBRIC for Chapter 2: REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE AND CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK

CHAPTER 2 SCORE EQUIVALENT LEGEND:

EQUIVALENT-
Related Literature
Conceptual Framework 50-46 = VERY GOOD
Hypothesis 45- 42= GOOD
41 -37 = FAIR
Definition of Terms 36 -20 = UNSATISFACTORY
Submission of Research
Paper
Format and Grammar
TOTAL
***The leader has the authority to deduct points from the scores of
group members, including themselves, if they fail to contribute or meet
expectations.
5-point deduction: For members (or the leader) who fail to meet the expected output on time or with quality below the agreed standard.15-point deduction: For
members (or the leader) who completely fail to fulfill their assigned tasks or responsibilities in the research paper. Any deductions must be discussed and agreed upon
by the group, and proper documentation should be submitted to justify the deductions (e.g., a log of contributions, minutes of meetings, or progress reports). Final
deductions are subject to the teacher’s review to ensure fairness and prevent misuse of authority by the leader.

GROUP:________ RESEARCH TITLE:________________________________________________

SECTION:__________________
LEADER:_______________________________ Asst. Leader:________________________________
MEMBERS:
______________________________________ _______________________________________
______________________________________ _______________________________________
______________________________________ _______________________________________
______________________________________ _______________________________________
______________________________________ _______________________________________
______________________________________ _______________________________________

DEOMEL I. CABALLERO
Research Teacher

PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2:QUANTITATIVE RESEARCCH

RUBRIC for Chapter 3 :METHODOLOGY
Criteria Excellent (10-9) Good (8-7) Fair (6-5) UNSATIFACTORY
(4)
Research The research design is exceptionally well- The research design is appropriate for The research design is somewhat The research design is
suited to the research question, objectives, the research question and objectives, appropriate but may lack some clarity inappropriate, unclear, or
Design and data. It is well-explained, justified, and with only minor issues in terms of or depth in explanation or poorly justified, leading to
addresses potential sources of bias or error. explanation or justification. justification. significant concerns about
bias or error.
The The sample and sample design are The sample and sample design are well- The sample and sample design are The description of the
exceptionally well-described, justifying the described and justify the selection described but may lack depth or sample and sample design
Sample/Sample selection method, sample size, and method, sample size, and clarity in justification or addressing is inadequate or unclear,
Design inclusion/exclusion criteria. Any potential inclusion/exclusion criteria. Minor biases. leading to concerns about
biases are acknowledged and addressed issues in explanation or addressing representativeness and
effectively. biases may be present. potential biases.
The Research The research instrument is exceptionally The research instrument is well- The research instrument is designed The research instrument
well-designed, clearly linked to research designed, linked to research objectives, but may lack depth or clarity in design is inadequate or
Instrument objectives, and tested for reliability and and tested for reliability and validity. description or justification. unclear, and reliability and
validity. It is described in detail, with any Minor issues in description or validity are not addressed,
modifications justified. justification may be present. raising concerns about
data quality.
Data Collection The data collection process is exceptionally The data collection process is well- The data collection process is The documentation of the
well-documented and includes a clear and documented, with a clear plan, described but may lack depth or data collection process is
detailed plan, procedures, and timeline. procedures, and timeline. Minor issues clarity in documentation or inadequate or unclear,
Any potential challenges or issues are in documentation or addressing addressing challenges. raising concerns about
acknowledged and addressed effectively. challenges may be present. data quality or timeliness.
Plan for Data The plan for data analysis is exceptionally The plan for data analysis is clear, The plan for data analysis is described The plan for data analysis
clear, specifying the statistical methods, specifying methods and procedures that but may lack depth or clarity in is inadequate or unclear,
Analysis software, and procedures to be used. It is are appropriate for research objectives specifying methods or and the chosen methods
well-suited to research objectives and and hypotheses. appropriateness. are not suitable for
hypotheses. research objectives and
hypotheses.
Submission of Submitted on or before the deadline; well- Submitted on the deadline with minimal Submitted 1-2 days late with notable Submitted more than 2
organized and complete issues or missing elements omissions or incomplete sections days late or incomplete;
Research Paper fails to meet expectations
Format and The chapter follows the specified The chapter mostly follows formatting The chapter partially follows The chapter does not
formatting guidelines accurately and guidelines but may have minor issues. formatting guidelines and may have follow formatting
Grammar consistently. Grammar, spelling, and Grammar, spelling, and punctuation are noticeable issues. Grammar, spelling, guidelines, and grammar,
punctuation are impeccable, with no errors. mostly correct, with few errors. and punctuation contain several spelling, and punctuation
errors. are consistently incorrect.

CHAPTER 3 SCORE EQUIVALENT LEGEND:

EQUIVALENT-
Research Design
The Sample/Sample 50-46 = VERY GOOD
Design 45- 42= GOOD
The Research Instrument 41 -37 = FAIR
36 -20 = UNSATISFACTORY
Data Collection
Plan for Data Analysis
Submission of Research Paper
Format and Grammar
TOTAL
***The leader has the authority to deduct points from the scores of
group members, including themselves, if they fail to contribute or meet expectations.
5-point deduction: For members (or the leader) who fail to meet the expected output on time or with quality below the agreed standard.15-point deduction: For
members (or the leader) who completely fail to fulfill their assigned tasks or responsibilities in the research paper. Any deductions must be discussed and agreed upon
by the group, and proper documentation should be submitted to justify the deductions (e.g., a log of contributions, minutes of meetings, or progress reports). Final
deductions are subject to the teacher’s review to ensure fairness and prevent misuse of authority by the leader.

GROUP:________ RESEARCH TITLE:________________________________________________

SECTION:___________________________
LEADER:_______________________________ Asst. Leader:________________________________
MEMBERS:
______________________________________ _______________________________________
______________________________________ _______________________________________
______________________________________ _______________________________________
______________________________________ _______________________________________
DEOMEL I. CABALLERO
Research Teacher