National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment

COURSE REPORT

To be completed by course instructors at the end of each course and given to program coordinator.

If the course is taught in more than one location the course report should be prepared for each location by the course instructors responsible for the course in each location. A combined report should be prepared by the course coordinator and the separate location reports attached.

Course Report
For guidance on the completion of this template, refer to Section 2.5 of Chapter 2 in Part 2 in this Handbook
Institution : : Salman bin Abdulaziz university Dept. Of Computer Science, Arts and Science College of Girls.

College/ Department:

A Course Identification and General Information

1. Course title and code. Computer and Society CS-316

2. If course is taught in more than one section indicate the section to which this report applies

48
3. Year and semester to which this report applies. Level-3 2nd Semester

4 Location (if not on main campus)

B- Course Delivery
1 Coverage of Planned Program Topics Planned Actual Reason for Variations if there is a difference of more than 25% of the hours planned

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

Computer and Human imagination History of Computing Computer and Education, Medicine, Government, Banking Computer and Business World Computing and Communication resources

3 3 3

3 3 3

3 3

3 3

(6) (7) (8)

System users and Developers Electronic Commerce, Artificial Intelligence and Business Intelligence Computer Ethics & Computer Crimes Computerized Databases and Privacy, Information Security. CAD and CAM

3 3

3 3

(9) (10)

2. Consequences of Non Coverage of Topics For any topics where significantly less time was spent than was intended in the course specification, or where the topic was not taught at all, comment on how significant you believe the lack of coverage is for the program objectives or for later courses in the program, and suggest possible compensating action if you believe it is needed. Topics (if any) not Fully Covered Significance of Lack of Possible Compensating Action Coverage Elsewhere in the Program N/A N/A N/A All Topics are covered completely

3. Effectiveness of Planned Teaching Strategies for Intended Learning Outcomes set out in the Course Specification. (Refer to planned teaching strategies in Course Specification and description of Domains of Learning Outcomes in the National Qualifications Framework) Domains List Teaching Strategies set out in Course Specification Were these Effective? No a. Knowledge 1.Books 2. Material from the internet 3. White Board Yes Difficulties Experienced (if any) in Using the Strategy and Suggested Action to Deal with Those Difficulties. Some time internet access is not available in the campus, then we experience problem for downloading the material from the internet.

b. Cognitive Skills

c. Interpersonal Skills and Responsibility

d. Numerical and Communication Skills

e Psychomotor Skills (if applicable)

4. Summarize any actions you recommend for improving teaching strategies as a result of evaluations in table 3 above.

C. Results
1 Number of students starting the course:

43

Number of students completing the course:

38

3 Distribution of Grades (If percentage marks are given indicate numbers in each 5 percentile group) No % No % No A B C D F Denied Entry In Progress Incomplete Pass Fail Withdrawn 16 10 5 7 3 38 3 2 OR 95100 90-94 85-89 80-84 75-79 Denied Entry In Progress Incomplete Pass Fail Withdrawn 3 70-74 6569 60-64 <60 -

4 Result Summary: Passed: No

38 2

Percent Percent

88% 4%

Failed Denied Entry

No No

3 -

Percent Percent

6% -

Did not complete No

5 Special factors (if any) affecting the results N/A

6. Variations from planned student assessment processes (if any) (See items C 4 and 5 in the Course Specification.) N/A Variations (if any) from planned assessment schedule (C5 in Course Specification) Variation Reason N/A N/A

b. Variations (if any) from planned assessment processes in Domains of Learning (C4 in Course Specification) Variation Reason

N/A N/A

7 Verification of Standards of Achievement (Eg. check marking of a sample of papers by others in the department. See G4 in Course Specification) (Where independent report is provided a copy should be attached.) Method(s) of Verification N/A Conclusion N/A

D Resources and Facilities

1. Difficulties in access to resources or facilities (if any) 2. Consequences of any difficulties experienced for student learning in the course.

Internet availability
* Power backup should be available for the systems during power failure.

E. Administrative Issues
1 Organizational or administrative difficulties encountered (if any) 2. Consequences of any difficulties experienced for student learning in the course.

* Notices should be given in both English and Arabic language. * No keys provided for the lockers

F Course Evaluation
1 Student evaluation of the course: Most of the students are very attentive and some are exceptionally good to take initiative. (Attach Survey Results if available) a List the most important criticisms and strengths Strength

Students are eager to learn more information. They are concerned about their subject and concentrate accordingly. Low level English but understanding ability b Response of instructor or course team to this evaluation 1) Make more presentations. 2) Play quiz to make session interactive 3) Slow conversation for better understanding. 2. Other Evaluation -- What evaluations were received? Specify and attach reports where available. (Eg. By head of department, peer observations, accreditation review, other stakeholders etc): a List the most important criticisms and strengths Same as above b Response of instructor or course team to this evaluation Same as above Weakness

G Planning for Improvement

1. Progress on actions proposed for improving the course in previous course reports: Actions proposed in the most recent previous course report(s) 1) Quiz competition 2) Try to converse in English 3) Encourage them to participate in class. State whether each action was undertaken, the impact, and if the proposed action was not undertaken or completed, give reasons. 1) Quiz done only within the class

2. Other action taken to improve the course this semester/year Provide a brief summary of any other action taken to improve the course and the results achieved. (For example, professional development for faculty, modifications to the course, new equipment, new teaching techniques etc.)

3. Action Plan for Next Semester/Year : Actions Required Completion Date Person Responsible

4. Recommendations to Program Coordinator (if Required) (Recommendations by the instructor to the program coordinator if any proposed action to improve the course would require approval at program, department or institutional level or that might affect other courses in the program.).

Name of Course Instructor: Amtul Waheed Signature: _________________________ Date Report Completed: ____________ Received by Program Coordinator Date: ________________