Calicut Notes
Calicut Notes
Organising Chairman
Dr. Kumarsn Chettiar
Organising Secretary
Dr. Subramanian V
Organising Treasurer
Dr V Ravikumar
Edited by
Dr. Sibin Surendran, MS, D.Ortho, DNB, MRCS (Ed), fellow knee
Department of Orthopaedics
Govt. Medical College, Kozhikode
CONTRIBUTORS
Calicut Ortho Course is being conducted for the 13th successive year. Over the years the
program has gained immense popularity due to the wealth of clinical material, best of faculty
members and whole hearted and enthusiastic participation of the entire department. Our
institution have become a DNB Orthopedics examination centre as well.
Over the years we noticed a pattern in the common questions asked during the past courses and
have gleaned the best of questions and answers. This is a humble attempt to compile these
questions along with the answers. We sincerely hope that this will help you become better
clinicians, guide you to provide scientific and evidence based treatment to your patients and
above all will help you to meet the expectations of your examiners; who can unpredictable and
hard to please.
We thank all the contributors which includes our staff members, residents and alumni. We
specially thank Dr. Gopinathan P our former faculty for his articles. We thank Dr Harvey George
and Dr Biju Kiliyanpilakkil; both working in United Kingdom for their articles.
Prof T S Gopakumar
Dr Rajesh Purushothaman
Dr. Ravikumar V.
Dr.Jacob Mathew
Dr. Aneen N. Kutty
Dr. Balaji zacharia
Dr Jojo Inassi
Dr. Sibin Surendran
Dr. Jeejeshkumar T. K.
Introduction
Introduce yourself and get the consent of the patient EXAMINATION CHECKLIST or the
parent of the child for examination.
Note down the name, age, sex, race and occupation Clean coat with ID card of the
patient. Admit card
The patient should be adequately exposed while Measuring tape
making sure that external genitalia are covered and Goniometer with scale the
Torch
patient is comfortable and relaxed. Explaining why you
Skin marking pencil
need to expose and the steps of examination will CNS kit
help in
relaxing the patient and in establishing a good Knee Hammer
rapport. Tuning fork
When examining a female patient make sure that T bandage you
have a female nurse or assistant. Tourniquet
Examine the child with the parents by the side. Very Scoliometer & plumbline young
children may be examined in the parent’s lap. Writing pad and pencil
First examine the normal or less symptomatic side first to
establish the normal range of movement for the particular patient and to make the patient
understand what is going to be done on the painful side.
Steps of all procedures should be explained to the patient to ensure patient comfort and
cooperation.
Patients with hip joint disease may present with pain, alteration of gait, instability, functional
limitation or limb length discrepancy as their presenting complaint. Hip symptoms may be due to
intra-articular, extra-articular or referred causes. Intra-articular conditions usually will cause
deformity, limitation of range of movement and worsening of symptoms on joint activity. Extra-
articular conditions usually will not cause restriction of range of movement, pain will be present
mainly in one particular movement or position of joint and tenderness will be localized to a
specific area. Always rule out referred pain from spine, pelvis, and sacroiliac joint or vascular
causes. Rarely hip disease may present as pain referred to the knee.
Examine the patient in standing, sitting, walking and lying down. When the patient is lying in the
supine position, always examine the patient from the right side. Make sure that the patient lies on
a hard surface to ensure that deformities are not concealed by a soft mattres.
HISTORY
Pain
Deformity
Walking ability
o Normal or altered
o Restricted or unrestricted
o Aided or unaided
o If aided; which aid is used
Ability to squat
Ability to sit cross legged
Ability to drive car
Ability to tie shoes
Fever – Whether associated with chills and rigor, severity, continued or intermittent and the
treatment taken.
Past history
Hypertension
Diabetes mellitus
Inflammatory arthropathy
Septic arthritis
Tuberculosis
Umbilical sepsis
H/o prolonged IV infusion in childhood
Blood Dyscriasis
Frequent episodes of bleeding
Frequent episodes of infection
H/o Childhood limping
Previous hospital admission
Previous surgery
Previous trauma
Personal history
Treatment History
Family history
GENERAL EXAMINATION
Nails- Pitting.
Ligamentous laxity (Wynne-Davis Criteria- 3 out of 5 needed for diagnosing generalized laxity)
Neurocutaneous markers-
LOCAL EXAMINATION
The steps of local examination are inspection, palpation, movements, measurements, gait
analysis, special tests and examination of spine and other joints and other system.
Inspection
Inspection should be done with the patient standing, walking, sitting and lying down. Look from
the front, sides and back. Look for any asymmetry when compared to the normal side.
Attitude
Deformity
Bony contours
Soft tissue contours
Swelling
Wasting
Limb length discrepancy
Skin over the joint
Attitude is the position of joint which is most comfortable to the patient. Position of comfort for
the hip joint is flexion, abduction & external rotation; as it allows maximum distension of the
capsule. If the joint is moved it can be brought to neutral position. In deformity; there is a fixed
contracture of the joint which will prevent the joint from being placed in the neutral position. A
flexed attitude of the hip joint can be corrected but a fixed flexion deformity cannot be corrected.
Normally when a person lies supine on a firm surface the lumbar spine lies flat on the table and
there will not be any gap between the lumbar spine and the couch; if there is a gap then lumbar
lordosis is exaggerated. In the case of flexion deformity of the hip (FFD) it is usually masked by
forward tilting of the pelvis, which in turn is masked by increased lumbar lordosis. Hence
exaggerated lumbar lordosis is a sign of fixed flexion deformity of the hip. Unmasking of the
fixed flexion deformity of hip can be done by the Thomas well leg raising test.
Level of ASIS
Normal hollowing of iliac fossa
Inguinal orifices
Widened perineum
Femoral artery pulsations
Abnormal fullness in the Scarpa’s triangle
Contour and level of the greater trochanter
Contour and bulk of the thigh muscles looking for abnormal contour and wasting
Scars, discolorations, swellings and sinuses
Laterally:
Posteriorly:
Scoliosis
Level of posterior superior iliac spine and iliac crests
Symmetry of the gluteal folds
Wasting of gluteal muscles
Scars, sinus or abnormal masses
Palpation
Palpate for any local rise in temperature, tenderness, bony thickening or swelling, soft tissue
mass or defect.
Anteriorly:
Laterally:
Greater trochanter
Level in both supero-inferior as well as antero-posterior directions.
Surface – Smooth or irregular or is it thickened.
Tenderness both local and on thrust
Posteriorly:
Any mass- Globular bony mass that moves with the femur is suggestive of dislocated
femoral head in presence of an unstable hip.
Posterior joint line tenderness- Located at the junction of the lateral one third and the
medial two third of a line connecting the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) and
greater trochanter.
Movements
Look for active and passive movements in all three axes. Look for flexion & extension,
abduction & adduction and the external & internal rotation. Look for any fixed rotation
deformities in both hip flexion as well as extension.
A deformity almost always occurs in all three planes, but it will be predominantly in one or two
planes. It may occur in the sagittal plane (Flexion-Extension), coronal plane (Abduction-
Adduction) or in the axial plane (Internal rotation-External rotation). In the case of flexion
deformity of the hip (FFD) it is usually masked by forward tilting of the pelvis, which in turn is
masked by increased lumbar lordosis. Hence exaggerated lumbar lordosis is a sign of fixed
flexion deformity of the hip. Normally when a person lies supine on a firm surface the lumbar
spine lies flat on the table and there will not be any gap between the lumbar spine and the couch;
if there is a gap then lumbar lordosis is exaggerated. Unmasking of the fixed flexion deformity of
hip can be done by the Thomas well leg raising test.
In order to assess the deformity, the coronal plane deformity is made manifest by correcting the
coronal compensatory tilting of the pelvis. This is called squaring of the pelvis.
Squaring of the pelvis is done by making both the ASIS at the same level. This is done by further
adducting the affected hip in presence of an adduction deformity till both ASIS are at the same
level. If there is some degree of free adduction present then the hip has to move through that free
range before the pelvis starts tilting. Hence before measuring the degree of adduction deformity,
gently abduct the limb till the free range of movement is over and pelvis just starts to tilt again.
Now measure the degree of adduction deformity by using a goniometer. The goniometer is place
with the hinge over the centre of hip and one arm is parallel to the midline of trunk and the other
arm is parallel to the lower limb. Abduction deformity is measured by further abducting the
affected hip using the same principles.
Flexion 1200
Extension 100
Abduction 400
Global limitation of all movements is seen with arthritis and differential limitation of abduction
and external rotation is seen with coxa vara.
3. If restricted; what is the severity?
Compare with the opposite side. If the opposite side is also abnormal then compare with the
normal range for the age, gender and race
4. Is the movements painless, painful?
5. If painful; during which movement and during which part of the arc of movement?
In patients with synovitis, the range of movements is normal but the terminal part of the arc is
painful. In case of arthritis all movements are restricted to some degree and painful. Pain on one
particular movement alone with normal range of movement is suggestive of extra-articular cause
of pain.
6. Is the limitation of movement due to mechanical causes or due to pain and spasm?
7. Is the axis of movement normal?
Normally when the hip is flexed the lower limb flexes towards the opposite shoulder. Axis
deviation during flexion can be seen in patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis.
8. Was there any exaggeration of the normal movements?
In presence of childhood septic arthritis (Tom Smith arthritis), dysplastic hip or post polio
residual paralysis the range of movements is exaggerated in all directions. In SCFE there will
be exaggerated extension, adduction and external rotation and limitation of flexion, abduction
and internal rotation.
Measurement
One should measure the length and circumference of the limb. Longitudinal measurement
includes measurement of the length of the entire lower extremity and measurement of segments.
The segements to measure are the leg segment, infratrochanteric segment and the
supratrochanteric segment. Longitudinal measurement of lower extremity involves measurement
of apparent length and true length.
Apparent length:
Keep both lower limbs parallel to each other in line with the trunk and measure from the
xiphisternum to the medial malleolus tip.
True length:
Square the pelvis in the method described earlier. Further adduct if there is an adduction
deformity and vice versa. True length of the affected limb is measured from the inferior edge of
ASIS to the tip of medial malleolus. Place the normal limb in exactly the same position as the
affected limb and then measure from ASIS to medial malleolus.
Segmental measurements
If there is limb length discrepancy then one should identify the anatomic region of discrepancy.
Supratrochanteric region is assessed by drawing the Bryant’s triangle, Nelaton’s line and
Shoemakers’ line. Infratrochanteric region is measured from the tip of greater trochanter to
lateral knee joint line. Leg segment is measured from medial malleolus tip to medial knee joint
line.
Bryant’s triangle is drawn by placing the patient in the supine position. Mark the tip of greater
trochanter and the inferior edge of ASIS with a skin pencil. Draw a line from the inferior edge of
ASIS vertically to the couch. Draw another line from the tip of trochanter to the first line and
measure. Normally the greater trochanter lies about 2-3 cm below the first line. Compare with
the opposite side. In case of severe shortening the greater trochanter may lie above the first line;
in such cases shortening will be the measured length of the line with 3 cm or normal side
measurement added to it.
Nelaton’s line is drawn by placing the patient in the lateral position with affected side up. Flex
the hip and knee to 900. Draw a line connecting the inferior edge of ASIS to the most prominent
portion of ischial tuberosity. In the normal hip the tip of greater trochanter will be just touching
the line. In patients with supratrochanteric shortening it will be above the line.
Shoemaker’s line is drawn on both sides from the tip of trochanter to the inferior edge of ASIS
and extended further on to the abdomen. Normally the lines will cross in the midline. In case of
supratrochanteric shortening the lines will cross on the opposite side.
Girth measurement is done at the bulkiest part of thigh and calf to look for wasting of muscles.
Wasting of muscles is usually found in long standing disease.
Special tests
Special tests are done as required depending on the clinical diagnosis. They can be divided into
the following.
1. Tests for deformity assessment
2. Tests for stability
3. Tests to assess limb length discrepancy
4. Tests for impingement
5. Tests for muscle contracture
Procedure – Stand on the right side of the patient with one hand under the lumbar spine of the
patient. With the other hand hold the unaffected side. Flex the unaffected knee fully, then flex
the unaffected hip till the excessive lumbar lordosis disappears. Measure the angle between the
thigh of the affected side and the couch to assess the angle of fixed flexion deformity of the hip.
Interpretation- Normally the limb will lie flat on the examination table. But if there is a fixed
flexion deformity the affected side will be off the couch. The angle between the long axis of
thigh and the examination table gives the angle of flexion deformity.
Patient position- Prone with hip and knees dangling beyond the end of the examination table
Procedure- Place one hand over the sacrum to stabilise the patient and to detect pelvic motion.
Gently extend the tested lower limb till the pelvis starts to move. Measure the angle between the
long axis of thigh and long axis of the examination couch.
Interpretation- The angle between the thigh and the table is the fixed flexion deformity.
Craig’s test
Procedure- One hand of the examiner is placed flat on the greater trochanter. Knee flexed to 900.
Hold the leg and gently rotate the hip in both directions till the greater trochanter is maximally
prominent.
Interpretation- The amount of internal rotation needed to make the greater trochanter maximally
prominent is the degree of anteversion.
Trendelenberg test
Procedure- Ask the patient to do a one legged stance on the affected limb for one minute. Note
the level of gluteal fold and PSIS.
Interpretation- Normally the pelvis on the opposite side will move up to shift the centre of
gravity due to contraction of gluteus medius of weight bearing side. Up to 50drop is considered
normal. If more than 2cm or 50then it is abnormal and suggests abductor insufficiency.
Insufficiency may be due to abnormal fulcrum, lever or power of the abductor mechanism.
Fallacies- False positive in adduction deformity of hip, quadratus lumborum paralysis and
painful lesions of sacroiliac joint. False negative in abduction deformity.
Procedure- Flex the knee and hip to 900 and 100 adduction. Stabilise the pelvis with one hand.
Hold the knee and thigh with the other hand. Push and in a to and fro motion.
Ortolani test
Procedure- Flex the hip to 900 and fully flex the knees. Hold both the proximal thigh with the
thumb over the medial aspect of thigh and other fingers over the greater trochanter region. Apply
pressure over the greater trochanter and gentle longitudinal traction. Move the hip into abduction
gently.
Interpretation- If the hip is dislocated; resistance to abduction will be felt at 30-400 of abduction,
then a clink will be felt as the femoral head reduces into the acetabulum slipping over the
acetabular rim. Once the hip is reduced further abduction will be possible up to normal.
Barlow test
Has two parts. First step is similar to Ortolani test, but each hip is separately tested.
Interpretation- If the hip is dislocated; resistance to abduction will be felt at 30-400 of abduction,
then a clink will be felt as the femoral head reduces into the acetabulum slipping over the
acetabular rim. Once the hip is reduced further abduction will be possible up to normal.
Apply backward and outward pressure over the medial aspect of proximal femur with the thumb.
Interpretation- If the hip is unstable the head will be felt to dislocate with a clunk. Once the
pressure is removed, the head relocates.
Gouvain’s test
Procedure- Hold the femur with one hand, stabilise the pelvis. Adduct and internally rotate the
hip. Look for spasmodic contraction of muscles
Galeazzi’s test
Procedure- Flex the hip and knee to 900. Note the relative level of knees.
Interpretation- If the knee of the affected side is at a lower level there is limb length discrepancy.
Allis test
Procedure- Flex the knee to 900, flex the hip and place the foot flat on the couch. Note the
relative level of knees.
Interpretation- If the knee of the affected side is at a lower level there is limb length discrepancy.
If it is lower towards the hip side; the femoral side is shortened. If it is lower towards the leg
side; the tibial segment is shortened.
Procedure- Put the affected limb on the opposite limb in the Flexion-Abduction-External rotation
(FABER) position or Figure 4 position. Apply hand over the medial aspect of knee and force the
hip into full abduction and extension.
Interpretation- If the hip cannot be fully abducted and extended to the level of opposite limb or if
there is catching type of pain then test is positive.
Scour test
Procedure- Done by moving the hip in an arc involving flexion-adduction and extension-
abduction. During this movement apply axial load and rotate into external and internal rotation.
Procedure- Ask the patient to actively flex the hip to 30 degrees while keeping the knee in
extension and to hold the position. Apply resistance just proximal to the knee.
Procedure- Put the affected limb in the Flexion-Adduction-Internal rotation (FADDIR) position.
Apply hand over the anterolateral aspect of knee and force the hip into full adduction and
internal rotation.
Procedure- Flex the hip to 600 and flex the knee. Stabilise the pelvis with one hand. Hold the leg
with other hand. Move the hip into adduction and internal rotation with gentle force.
Obers test
Patient position – Lateral position with the affected side up. Opposite hip and knee flexed to 900.
Procedure- Flex the hip and the knee to 900. Stabilise the pelvis with one hand. Hold the leg with
other hand. Move the hip into full abduction and external rotation. Extend the knee and hip and
let the limb drop down due to gravity.
Interpretation- Normally the limb should drop down and rest on the couch. If the limb is held
high in abduction, there is contracture of the iliotibial band.
Ely’s test
Examination of Gait:
Front : Look at trunk , pelvis and swinging of hand (contralateral to the hand)
SUMMARY
DIAGNOSIS
Pathological : Traumatic/Inflammatory/Neoplastic/Infective/Degenerative
2. General Examination
Dr Raju K, Associate Professor, Calicut Medical College
Dwarfism is a medical disorder with the sole requirement being an adult height under 147 cm (4
ft 10 in).Two main categories of dwarfism depending on the upper segment:lower segment ratio
18. What are the general examination findings in Musculo skeletal Malignancy?
CASE DESCRIPTION
HISTORY
12 year old male presenting with
Pain left hip – 1month
Limping left side – 1 month
Apparently normal child gives history of insignificant trauma to left hip 1 month ago when he
tripped and fell down. Even though he was able to walk after the incident, he had significant pain
over the left groin which subsided with analgesics over 2 days. He continued to have dull aching
pain over the groin and medial aspect of thigh aggravated by activity and relieved by rest which
was accompanied by limping over the same side, which was noticed by his parents. There is no
radiation of the pain, rest or night pain. He had no fever or other constitutional symptoms over
the same period. He gave no history suggestive of involvement of other hip or other joints of the
body. No h/o childhood limp. He is currently able to squat in an Indian toilet with difficulty and
unable to sit cross legged.
Past history is insignificant with no history of major surgery, trauma, prolonged hospitalization
or any chronic intake of medication. Developmental milestones are comparable to siblings.
He is the 2nd child of a non-consanguineous marriage with no similar complaints in his sibling or
parents.
GENERAL EXAMINATION
(Anthropometry)- height 120 cm weight -60 kg us:ls ratio – 1 . arm span – 125 cm.
(Head to foot) – no craniofacial dysmorphism, thyroid swelling, rachitic features or features of
generalized ligamentous laxity. Genitalia normally developed for age with presence of axillary
and pubic hair.
LOCAL EXAMINATION
Inspection
Patient lying supine on a hard couch with hip and knee extended and left limb in external
rotation as evidenced by patella and left foot facing outward with apparent shortening on the left
side.
ASIS on the left side is at a higher level. Thigh muscle atrophy on lt side. No scars , sinuses,
dilated veins or abnormal swellings anteriorly. Greater trochanter is posteriorly placed and
elevated as compared to opposite side with no scars or sinuses. Posteriorly no scars , sinuses or
swellings or muscle atrophy.
Palpation
No anterior or posterior joint tenderness. Normal resistance in Scarpa’s triangle. Femoral pulses
palpable equally and normally on both sides. Trochanter shows no irregularity, is non tender ,
smooth, elevated and posteriorly placed. No abnormal masses palpable posteriorly.
Movements
Patient has no fixed flexion deformity with 0 -120 flexion accompanied by axis deviation
evidenced by knee moving to same shoulder past 90 degrees of flexion . Flexion is terminally
limited by pain. Arc of motion is not associated with pain or crepitus. Fixed adduction deformity
of 10 degrees with free adduction of 20 degrees limited by pain and spasm. External rotation
deformity of 30 degree with further ER of 20 degrees limited by pain and spasm. No difference
of rotations in extension. Extension of 10 degree.
Measurements
Patient has an apparent shortening of 2 cm on the left side with true shortening of 1 cm on
squaring the pelvis, which is accommodated in the supra trochanteric area on drawing the
Bryant’s triangle. No discrepancy of circumferential measurements on both side.
Lines and special tests
On drawing the Nelaton’s line, GT is above the line on the left side. Shoemaker’s lines
converges on the opposite side, line on the left side pass below the umblilicus. Chiene’s lines
converge on the left side.
Trendelenberg not done. Telescopy negative.
Sacroiliac stress tests, opp hip, spine and i/l knee – NAD
No distal neurovascular deficit, no inguinal lymphadenopathy
GAIT
Trendelenberg
DIAGNOSIS
Unilateral hip disease left sided probably due to Slipped capital femoral epiphysis
Q&A
Q2. You said there is restricted FABIR. is there an actual loss of motion?
A. No. It probably represents a change in the arc of motion because of the displaced
epiphysis, with restricted FABIR and relatively increased EXADER.
Q8. What type of slip is this? What are the different types?
A. Chronic slip as the duration is more than 3 weeks.
I. Onset of symptoms :
Acute (< 3 weeks)/ chronic(> 3 weeks) / acute-on-chronic
II. Functional (patients ability to bear weight)
Stable(able to bear weight +/- crutches)1 / unstable2
III. Morphologic (Southwick – head-shaft angle on frog-leg lateral view
Mild – differs by less than 30º from the normal contralateral side
Moderate – angle difference between 30º and 60º
Severe - > 60⁰
Q12. What are the complications of your technique and how will you avoid it?
A. Incorrect screw placement with screw penetration into the joint is the most common
complication.
To avoid this – tip of the screw must be in the center of the epiphysis both in AP and
lateral views. Advance the screw tip to no more than 8mm or one third of the femoral head
radius from subchondral bone.
Q13. Are there any other methods of treatment? What are the advantages and
disadvantages of each?
A.Immobilization in a hip spica cast
Advantages- Avoids surgery
Prophylactic immobilisation of opp. Hip
Disadvantages- No proper immobilisation given. Progression of slip frequent.
B. Open epiphyseodesis with iliac bone graft
Advantages – avoids complications of internal fixation
Disadvantage – fixation not stable as with screws or pins
C. Open reduction with corrective osteotomy through physis and internal fixation with use of
multiple pins( Dunn, Fish cuneiform subcapital osteotomy)
Advantage – epiphysis is anatomically repositioned on the metaphysis without creating tension
on the epiphyseal vasculature
Disadvantage – high risk of AVN
D. Compensating base – of – neck osteotomy with in situ stabilization of SCFE with use of
multiple pin fixation(Kramer – intracapsular BON ; Barmada – extracapsular BON)
Advantage – less chance for AVN
Disadvantage – only 35 – 55 degree correction possible. ; shortens femoral neck leading to
femoroacetabular impingement
E. Intertrochanteric osteotomy with internal fixation ( southwick – through lesser trochanter;
Correction possible only upto 45 degrees . less chance for AVN. Currently not recommended as
primary treatment of SCFE
Q14. I agree with treatment for a moderate to severe slip. But can’t you leave a mild
degree SCFE alone?
A. A mild slip should also be treated with pinning because of –
Risk of progression of slip
Future risk of degenerative joint disease
Q19. You mentioned that FFD can occur with an anterior slip. Are there any other types?
A. Valgus slip – superior and posterior displacement - restriction of flexion and adduction.
Anterior slip – anterior displacement. Restriction of extension and external rotation.
4. Slipped upper femoral epiphysis (SUFE)
Dr Harvey George, United Kingdom
A disorder of the proximal femoral physis where a dehiscence occurs through the growth plate of
the immature hip. The slip occurs through hypertrophic zone of the physis. Bilateral in 30% of
cases.
Aetiology of SUFE?
Most cases are idiopathic. It may be associated with endocrine and metabolic disorders.
Imbalance between oestrogen and growth hormone increases the thickness of the physis while
reducing its resistance to shear forces. Complication of treatment with chemotherapy and
radiotherapy or occur with administration of growth hormone for short stature.
Associated Factors include obesity (single greatest risk factor), femoral retroversion and
puberty
The most useful classification system is the one by Loder. This outcome-related classification of
slips is based on epiphyseal stability. This classification system is useful as it correlates with
outcome and predicts the likelihood of AVN.
Stable slip. The child is able to weight bear with or without crutches.
Unstable slip. Child is unable to tolerate any kind of weight bearing on the affected hip
Unstable hips have a 47% satisfactory prognosis compared to a 96% satisfactory prognosis in the
stable-hip group. The incidence of AVN in the stable group is nil, whereas 50% in the unstable-
hip group will develop AVN. Joint effusion is absent and the severity of slip is less in the stable-
hip group.
1. Kline’s line (Perkin’s sign). A line drawn on the superior border of the femoral neck transects
the femoral head and does not pass through the
femoral head = Trethowan’s sign
2. Metaphyseal blanch sign of Steel. A crescent shaped, dense area in the metaphysis on AP view
represents superimposition of the posteriorly displaced epiphysis
3. Joint space increased inferiorly
4. Widening and irregularity of physis (appears woolly, earliest sign)
5. Decreased epiphysis height (slipped posteriorly)
6. Remodelling changes of the neck (in chronic slips): smooth superior anterior portion and
callus formation on inferior posterior portions
The aim of treatment is to stabilise the slip to prevent further progression, and to promote
physeal closure.
Operative options include:
• Pinning in situ: with a single cannulated AO screw (for grade I and II slips)
• Bone graft epiphysiodesis (high complication rates: AVN, chondrolysis, HO bone formation)
• Primary osteotomy by experienced paediatric hip surgeon (for severe slip)
Osteotomies
The more distally chosen the site, the lower the rate of AVN and chondrolysis. In severe SUFE,
the following osteotomies can be carried out at four levels:
• Subcapital osteotomy
• Dunn procedure. A relatively high degree of deformity can be corrected by subcapital
osteotomy but the growth plate must still be open. This is a cuneiform subcapital wedge
resection with trimming posterior beak. This remains controversial due to the high reported rates
of AVN (37%)
• Fish and Cuneiform. Similar to Dunn with modification
• Basal cervical osteotomy. Offers a less precise correction but gives good results. Avoids
dissection of the adjacent growth plate
• Intertrochanteric osteotomy (Kramer)
• Subtrochanteric osteotomies
• Southwick triplanar osteotomy at the level of the lesser trochanter. Reasonably safe but
technically difficult
Screening the hip with the image intensifier (moving the image intensifier around, near near far
far method)
Radiographic contrast medium injection through the cannulated screw.
Serial radiographs during follow up.
Complications of SUFE ?
AVN. Most common complication. Related to unstable (50%) or severe (25%) slip.
Chondrolysis. Rapid progressive loss of articular cartilage associated with pin penetration of the
joint and multiple screw fixation. Diagnosis indicated by virtually nil range of hip movement,
hip pain and a narrowed joint space. Confirm with MRI
Subtrochanteric fracture. Due to low screw placement at insertion or removal
Degenerative joint disease. Can develop in welltreated moderate slips with no complications.
Approximately 10% of patients with SUFE develop OA
Residual leg length inequality and rotational deformity (severe slips that may require late
corrective osteotomy
5. TUBERCULOSIS OF HIP
Q&A
Q1. Why do you say that this case is tuberculous arthritis of the hip?
A. History
Age and Sex: First four decades (though any age is not an exception, this is the most
common age group affected).
Pain of few weeks or months duration
Night Cry
Fever, loss of body weight
Previous history of Pulmonary TB (If present)
H/o Pulmonary TB in the family contacts etc. (if present)
On Examination:
Antalgic Gait
Characteristic deformity of Flexion, Adduction, Internal Rotation with apparent
shortening with or without true shortening (depending upon the stage of arthritis)
Wasting of muscles out of proportion to the symptoms
Palpable cold abscess (If present)
Sinus (If present)
Hip Movement is painful and restricted in all direction throughout the range of movement
associated with spasm of adductors and lower abdominal muscles
On measurement there is apparent shortening with or without true shortening depending
on the stage
Q2. What is the clinical Staging of tuberculosis? Why are you specifically saying that
this is arthritis?
A. Clinically Tuberculosis of the hip has four stages.
Stage of synovitis
Stage of early arthritis
Stage of advanced arthritis
Stage of dislocation/subluxation
In the synovitis stage, limb has got characteristic attitude of flexion, abduction and
external rotation with apparent lengthening. There will not be much restriction to the hip
movement and pain is felt at the extremes of the movement. This position is seen because this is
the position which allows maximum capsular distention.
In early arthritis stage, the attitude is that of flexion, adduction and internal rotation with
apparent shortening. This deformity develops because patient prefers to lie in the lateral position
with the affected hip up, and also because of muscle spasm. In early arthritis, there will be only
apparent shortening whereas in advanced arthritis, there will be apparent as well as true
shortening. Shortening will be in the range of 2-3 cm.
In the stage of dislocation, attitude will be flexion, adduction, and internal rotation with
true shortening. Shortening will be more than 3cm. Femoral head is usually palpable in the
gluteal region
Q3. Whether patient can get the attitude of flexion abduction and external rotation in
the stage of arthritis?
A. Yes. This occurs if the patient habitually keeps her limb in this attitude for pain relief.
This may also occur if ligament of Bigelow (iliofemoral ligament) is destroyed in the
tuberculous process. In this situation patient may have true shortening with no apparent
shortening (or may even have apparent lengthening of the limb) due to abduction deformity.
Q4. What is cold abscess? What all locations will you look for cold abscess in a case of
tuberculosis of hip?
A. Cold abscess is the combined result of tuberculous infection as well as due to reactive
exudative process. It usually composed of serum, leucocytes, caseous material, bone debris,
tubercle bacilli etc.
In hip tuberculosis, usual sites of cold abscess are in the front of hip in the femoral
triangle, in the medial side of thigh, posteriorly in the gluteal area, laterally in the trochanteric
region, ischiorectal fossa etc. It may even track down to the knee or even ankle along with
neurovascular bundle. From hip joint it may track medially to reach the pelvis. From here it may
travel above the levator ani and point above the inguinal ligament or it may track below the
levator ani to track into the ischiorectal fossa. (So, do not forget to do a per rectal examination of
the patient)
Q6. What are the areas around hip where TB commonly starts?
A. Roof of the acetabulum (commonest), Head of the femur, Babcock’s triangle, greater
trochanter. Rarely it can be synovial type of tuberculosis.
Q7. What is the boundary of Babcock’s triangle
A. It is a radiological triangle seen at the neck of femur. Its boundaries are
Medially physis of head of femur
Inferiorly inferior border of neck of femur
Laterally primary compressive trabeculae.
Its significance is that it is a common focus of origin of tuberculosis on the femoral side.
Q11. Now clinically and radiologically we are suspecting tuberculous arthritis of hip, how
will you proceed further?
A. I would like to confirm the diagnosis. I will aspirate the joint and send the specimen for
AFB staining as well as for tuberculous culture. I will also send the aspirate for RT PCR
(Reverse transcriptase PCR). Culture can be done either by LJ medium or by Bactec radiometric
method. I will also try to get a tissue diagnosis either by a Tru-Cut biopsy or open biopsy.
Q14. If this patient is diagnosed to have active tuberculous arthritis, how will u manage
the patient?
A. Nutrition: Improve the nutrition of the patient
ATT: Do a LFT, ophthalmology evaluation and start antituberculous treatment as per
DOTS regimen. In the intensive phase give four drugs for 2 months (Rifampicin 450 mg, INH
600 mg, Pyrazinamide 1500 mg and Ethambutol 1200 mg all given thrice weekly) and in
continuation phase only INH and Rifampicin is given in the above dosage for 4 more months.
HIP: I will put the patient on traction and will start active mobilization of the hip joint as
tolerated by the patient. Usually by 6 months patient may be able to do a partial weight bearing
crutch walking and by 12-18 months patient may be able to fully weight bear. If patient is not
responding for this nonoperative treatment I will do a joint debridement surgery and then
continue traction and ATT as usual. In spite of this treatment if it is felt that the joint is going for
fibrous ankylosis I will offer either a stable but immobile painless hip or a mobile but unstable
painless hip, and treat depending on the patient’s preference. Depending on that I will do an
excision arthroplasty or an arthrodesis of the hip.
Q15. What are the prerequisites before doing the hip arthrodesis? What position you will
do arthrodesis?
A. Lumbo sacral spine, ipsilateral knee and contralateral hip should be normal. So never say
arthrodesis as an option of treatment in a bilateral hip disease patient.
Hip is arthrodesed in 300 flexion, neutral abduction-adducion and 150 external rotation.
Q16. What are the structures removed in girdle stones excision arthroplasty?
A. Head of femur, neck, proximal part of greater trochanter and acetabular margin.
Q18. If you are doing THR whether you will do a cemented or uncemented in a case of
tuberculous arthritis.
A. There is no difference whether you do a cemented or uncemented regarding disease flare
up, functional results etc as far as tuberculosis is concerned.
The decision to do a cemented or uncemented is based on the patient’s age, bone stock,
affordability etc. If the patient is young and has good bone stock it is better to go for uncemented
hip.
Q8. What is the reason for valgus deformity of upper femur in DDH ?
A. Normally when a child is born there is coax valga and increased femoral anteversion. As
the child grows older and starts weight bearing the anteversion and neck shaft angle decreases.
Due to abnormal pattern of weight transmission excessive valgus and anteversion persists in
children with DDH. Muscle imbalance can also significantly affect the growth and morphology
of the upper femur. Excessive adductor pull or inadequate abductor muscle function results in a
valgus deformity of the upper femur.
Q9. What is C E angle and its importance ?
A. Center edge angle of Wiberg
Provides useful information after the age of 5 years (may be used in adults);
AP radiograph should be made standing in neutral rotation
Mark the centre of femoral head
Angle formed by a line drawn from the center of the femoral head to the outer
edge of the acetabular roof, and a vertical line drawn through the center of the femoral
head;
Angles greater than 25 deg are considered normal
Less than 20 deg indicates severe dysplasia
Q10. What is Von Rosen View & its significance?
A. Used to evaluate femoral head reduction in child with suspected congenital hip
dislocation/subluxation
Patient is supine with hips abducted 45 deg & maximally internally rotated
AP projection of the pelvis is then obtained
Normally an imaginary line extended up the femoral shaft intersects the acetabulam
If hip is dislocated the line crosses above the acetabulam
Q11. What is Hilgenreiner's Line & Perkin's Line and its importance ?
A. Hilgenreiner's Line: horizontal line along inferior aspect of triradiate cartilage
Perkin's Line: vertical line along lateral edge of acetabulum
Perkin's quadrant’s Lower inner – Normal
Upper inner – Subluxation
Lower outer – Dislocation
Upper outer – High dislocation
1. Define DDH?
DDH comprises a wide spectrum of hip abnormalities ranging from mild acetabular dysplasia to
complete dislocation of the hip.
Graf used ultrasound for assessing DDH. Graf’S Hip angle measurements are based on three
lines and two angles
1. Baseline is drawn on the ilium to the junction of the cartilaginous roof and bony acetabular
roof 2. Bony acetabular roofline 3. Cartilaginous roofline.
The alpha (a) angle is formed by the bony acetabular roofline and the iliac line
The beta (b) angle is between the baseline and the cartilaginous roofline
In the normal hip a>60°, and the smaller the angle the greater the dysplasia. When b>77° the hip
is subluxed and the labrum is everted. The hip ratio measurement calculates the percentage of
femoral head coverage under the bony roof.
Based on the depth and shape of the acetabulum as seen on coronal image. Four types of hip are
described:
Type I: Normal hip.
Type II: Shallow acetabulum with a rounded rim. Immature or somewhat abnormal.
Immature(physiological) hip spontaneously resolves in infants <3 months old. Mildly dysplastic
in infants >3 months old persists without treatment.
Type III: Subluxated or low dislocation. Bony roof deficient, labrum everted.
Type IV: High dislocation. Flat bony acetabulum. Labrum interposed between femoral head and
lateral wall of the ilium.
Muscles about the hip contract and become shortened. Iliopsoas tendon becomes interposed
between the femoral head and acetabulum blocking reduction
The hip joint becomes more dysplastic and filled with fibrofatty tissue (pulvinar)
The capsule becomes redundant and expanded. An arthrogram may show an hourglass
constriction of the joint capsule caused by the contracted iliopsoas, which blocks hip reduction
Ligamentum teres becomes lengthened, hypertrophied and redundant. The femoral head and
neck remain anteverted and in valgus position. Head becomes misshapen and flattened with
delayed ossification of the epiphysis
Acetabulum labrum becomes elongated and hypertrophied and may infold into the joint (inverted
limbus) blocking reduction of the femoral head.
Abnormal femoral head and false acetabulum develop in the ilium wing Transverse acetabular
ligament contracts and is a major block to a deep concentric hip reduction
Place patient in supine position, usually with GA, aseptic technique. Use fluoroscopic control
with careful placement of the needle through the adductor approach into the empty acetabulum.
Check the position of the needle using fluoroscopy and inject a small amount of diluted contrast
medium. Image in the position of dislocation and reduction. Note any obstacles to reduction and
determine the stability of reduction. Dangers include scoring of the femoral head cartilage with
the needle, injection into the growth plate or the piercing of femoral blood vessels.
Femoral nerve palsy secondary to excessive hip flexion. Brachial plexopathy due to compression
from high-riding shoulder strap and knee subluxations from improperly positioned straps. AVN
occurs in as many as 2.4% of cases splinted in the safe zone. Failure of hip reduction. Fixed
posterior dislocation with damage to the posterior acetabulum due to failure to detect persistent
dislocation (Pavlik harness disease) and skin maceration
12. What are the complications you are worried about following DDH treatment?
Osteonecrosis seen following all forms of treatment
Increased rates associated with excessive or forceful abduction, previous failed closed treatment
and repeat surgery
Diagnosis based on radiographic findings that include failure of appearance or growth of the
ossific nucleus 1 year after reduction, broadening of femoral neck, increased density and
fragmentation of ossified femoral head and residual deformity of proximal femur after
ossification
Recurrence approximately 10% with appropriate treatment; requires radiographic follow-up until
skeletal maturity
8. OSTEOTOMIES AROUND HIP
Q1. Name few osteotomies around hip ?
A. Name any few osteotomies given in this section which you are sure of answering
properly.
Q2. What are the osteotomies done for CDH and unstable hip ?
A. Femoral osteotomies : Varus derotation
Primary femoral shortening
Acetabular : Salter innominate osteotomy
Pemberton osteotomy
Steel or Ganz osteotomy
Chiari shelf osteotomy
Dial osteotomy
Spherical acetabular osteotomy
Q5. What are the osteotomies done for osteonecrosis of femoral head ?
A. Transtrochanteric rotational osteotomy of Sugioka
Q8. What are the indications for varus derotation osteotomy in CDH?
A. Stable hip in internal rotation and abduction
Q27. What are the objectives of the cuneiform Y shaped valgus osteotomy of the Pauwel
in congenital coxa vara ?
A. To keep the capital femoral epiphysis perpendicular to the compressive force
and to decrease the bending stress in femoral neck.
Medial displacement of the upper femoral shaft widens the femoral neck, and eliminate
the tension stress caused by the bending.
Q39. What is the principle of doing McMurray’s osteotomy in ununited fracture neck of
femur ?
A. Valgus lifting of the proximal fragment occurs due to the pull of psoas major on the
medially displaced distal fragment, making the fracture line more horizontal
Arm chair effect the distal fragment is placed directly under the head of femur. The
weight transmission occurs from the head to the distal shaft fragment by passing the fracture site.
Hence even if the fracture does not unite, painless weight bearing is possible.
McMurrays osteotomy allows painless weight bearing even in the presence of persistent
non union, which is it’s advantage over angulation osteotomies.
Q42. What are the angulation osteotomies done for ununited # neck of femur
A. 1. Pauwels valgus osteotomy
2. Dickson’s high geometric osteotomy
Q43. What are the displacement osteotomies done for the ununited fracture neck of
femur :
A. 1. McMurray’s osteotomy (oblique)
2. Putti's osteotomy (horizontal)
Q44. What are the osteotomies done for the ankylosed hip as a sequelae of septic arthritis
in unsound position ?
A. 1. Open wedge osteotomy (Gant)
2. Closing wedge osteotomy (Whitman)
3. Brackett Ball and Socket osteotomy
Q&A
Q3. What are the complications and sequelae of septic arthritis of hip?
A. Sepsis may result in both direct and indirect consequences to one or both sides of the
joint.
Direct damage to the articular cartilage is common, and if severe, partial or complete
joint destruction may culminate in ankylosis (fibrous or bony) or instability from
subluxation/dislocation .
Indirect consequences result from physeal damage and avascular necrosis.
In addition to joint destruction, consequences of neglected hip sepsis include joint
instability, abductor insufficiency, and leg length discrepancy. Leg length discrepancy results
from physeal arrest, joint subluxation/dislocation, and/or malpositioning of the extremity from
contracture or ankylosis.
Complications
Destruction of articular cartilage
Destruction of the physis
AVN
Subluxation or dislocation
Long term sequelae
Deformity
Stiffness
Instability
LLD
Growth disturbances
Arthritis
Ankylosis
Osteomyelitis
Q8. What are the surgical options available and what needs to be considered while
deciding on the surgical option.
A. A. Painful Joint Degeneration
1. Resection Arthroplasty
2. Hip Arthrodesis
3. Greater Trochanteric Arthroplasty
4. Pelvic Support Osteotomy
5. Total Hip Replacement
B. Abductor Insufficiency
1.Greater Trochanteric Growth Arrest(in <7yrs old with near normal hip
articulation)
2. Greater Trochanteric Transfer Distal, Lateral, Or Both
3. Pelvic Support Osteotomy
C. Leg Length Discrepancy
1. Soft Tissue Release
2. Osteotomy
3. Epiphysiodesis
4.Lengthening
5. Pelvic Support Osteotomy
D. Instability (Pistoning)
1. Open Reduction
2. Greater Trochanteric Arthroplasty(The greater trochanter is surgically placed
into the acetabulum in order to restore stability at the articulation).
3. Pelvic Support Osteotomy
4.Arthrodesis Or Total Hip Replacement
E. Loss of Motion
1. Soft Tissue Release
F. Malpositioned Extremity
1. Realignment Osteotomy
Q12. If you have a relatively intact neck which is articulating with the acetabulum,what
are the different proximal femoral osteotomies you can do?
A. i) Gantz - Open wedge osteotomy
ii) Whitman – Closed wedge osteotomy
iii) Brackett – Ball and Socket osteotomy
Q13. Why do you say that the treatment of sequelae of septic hips should be delayed?
A. i) Because of risk of reactivation of infection
ii) The status of femoral head and neck will be understood better only if sufficient time is
given for remodelling
Q14. When will you do an limb length equalisation procedure in case of shortening?
A. It should be done only after the reconstruction surgery
Q9. What all factors will you consider for planning surgery?
A. Age
Presence of AVN
Resorption of fracture ends
Posterior comminution
Amount of osteoporosis
Previous surgery
Presence of infection
Condition of acetabulum
Prior hip symptoms(OA)
Comorbidities
Duration of injury
Fracture variability(site and angulation)
Q17. What are the various closed reduction maneuvers described for #NOF
A. Maneuvers in extension-
-Whitman
-Deyerle
-Swiontkowsi
Maneuvers in flexion
-Leadbetter-flexion-IR-circumduction to abduction and extension- reduction
checked by resting heel on palm if it rests with out ER then there is secure reduction
-Flynn
Hydrostatic pressure theory. Epiphyseal arteries transverse the neck between bone and an
inelastic capsule. This makes them vulnerable to pressure rise, e.g. reactive synovitis. The
femoral neck venous drainage is disturbed with increased interosseous venous pressure. This
leads to arterial or venous thrombosis.
It is thought that repeated ischaemic episodes at the femoral epiphysis rather than a single event
cause the disease syndrome.
1. Transient synovitis
2. Infection (septic arthritis, tuberculosis and osteomyelitis)
3. Blood dyscrasias (lymphoma, leukaemia)
4. Juvenile chronic arthritis
5. Rheumatic fever
6. Sickle cell disease
Bilateral in 10 to 12%. Both hips are never at the same stage of disease (metachronous) unlike
in skeletal dysplasia were both hips looks similar (synchronous).
Necrotic stage - infarction produces a smaller, sclerotic epiphysis with medial joint space
widening
Fragmentation stage - process of ongoing necrotic bone resorption and new bone formation. This
repair process produces the appearance of lateral fragmentation of the femoral epiphysis.
Catterall’s staging for Perthes disease is based on amount of femoral head involvement on AP
and lateral radiographs. It is determined during the fragmentation stage. The group may appear
to change during the disease process. Hence has little prognostic value. Catterall’s classification
has large inter- and intra-observer errors, inter-observer agreement 85%.
Group II: More than 25% head involvement but medial and lateral columns intact
Group III: 75% femoral head involvement but intact medial column
Group A: Less than half the femoral head is involved and intact lateral pillar
Group B: More than half of the head is involved and involved lateral pillar
Herring lateral pillar classification for Perthes disease is evaluated in the early fragmentation
stage using AP radiographs of the pelvis. It has less inter- and intra-observer error. The height of
the lateral epiphyseal pillar is compared with the height of the normal contralateral epiphysis.
Group B/C: Lateral pillar narrowed 2-3mm or poorly ossified with about 50% height
Early radiological findings in Perthes disease are medial joint space widening (earliest) ,
irregularity of femoral head ossification and cresent sign (represents a subchondral fracture)
These are radiographic findings associated with poor prognosis in Perthes disease.
Lateral subluxation and calcification lateral to the head suggest that head is already deformed.
Gage sign suggests that physeal and epiphyseal ossification is severely affected; such growth
arrest leads to head deformity in future. Diffuse metaphyseal reaction suggests that entire
proximal femoral physis is affected and ossification is defective. Horizontal growth plate
suggests that the lateral part of physis is not growing while the medial part continues to grow;
points to future head deformity
Widening of medial joint space is called Waldenstrom sign. It is due to lateral subluxation of
head, effusion into the hip, swelling of soft tissue within the fovea and continued growth of
articular cartilage which draws nutrition from synovial fluid.
Decreased size of capital epiphysis when compared to other side and Waldensrom sign are the
earliest sign of Perthes disase.
13. What is the role of bone scan and MRI in Perthes disease ?
Bone scan can confirm suspected case of LCP . Decreased uptake (cold lesion) can predate
changes on radiographs
MRI can provide early diagnosis revealing alterations in the capital femoral epiphysis and physis
Q14. What is the role of arthrogram in Perthes disease ?
A dynamic arthrogram can demonstrate coverage and containment of the femoral head .
It is also used to assess suitability for surgery by assessing hinging or point loading at
acetabulum, area of contact and containment.
Ambulation abduction brace . This is a difficult type of treatment and there are concerns about
when to start and when to finish bracing.
Shelf arthroplasty. Indicated in the older child to prevent subluxation and increase acetabular
coverage
Chiari osteotomy. Performed in the older child with little remodelling potential to increase the
load-bearing area. May buy several years of painfree hip function before further surgery is
required
Valgus osteotomy. For hinge abduction when an enlarged head is laterally extruded and
impinges against the lateral acetabular rim on abduction, causing pain.
Stulberg classification is gold standard for rating residual femoral head deformity and joint
congruence. Done at maturity.
Class II: Spherical femoral head with either coax magna, short femoral neck or abnormally steep
acetabulum
2. Aspherical congruency (Class III and IV hips): mild to moderate OA develops in late
adulthood
3. Aspherical incongruency (Class V hips): severe arthritis develops before the age of 50 in these
hips.
Stulberg’s results showed that a lack of sphericity alone was not the only predictor of a poor
outcome(congruency was more important).
1. Lateral subluxation
2. Muscle wasting and adduction deformity making palpation easier
3. Coxa vara making the greater trochanter more prominent
4. Overgrowth off greater trochanter as its growth is unaffected
And because of increased pull of abductors on the greater trochanter in coxa vara.
12. BILATERAL HIP CASE
CASE PRESENTATION
HISTORY
42 year old female with pain left hip since the past 5 years and right hip since the past 2 years.
History of limping for the past 2 years. Pain is dull aching in nature, which is aggravated on
walking and relieved on taking rest. There is no radiation of pain and no diurnal variation. She is
unable to sit cross legged or squat. She has difficulty in climbing stairs and can manage to walk
to the toilet and back. She has been taking occasional analgesics with which pain was relieved
initially, but not now.
She has been suffering from bronchial asthma for which she has been on medication since the
past 20 years. She was on traditional medicines initially for 5 years following which she was on
allopathic treatment with oral and inhalational drugs. There has been a weight gain and puffiness
of face for the past 4 years. She is also taking drugs for hypertension. There is no past history of
seizures, diabetes, CAD or tuberculosis.
There is no family history of similar illness or tuberculosis in the family.
There is no history of childhood limping, no history of fever and hospitalization during
childhood. There is no early morning stiffness, involvement of small joints, evening rise of
temperature, no history of any significant trauma, no waxing or waning of symptoms, no history
of rashes, conjunctivitis, or any other features of seronegative arthritis.
GENERAL EXAMINATION
Ht.155 cm
Wt. 68 kg
Upper segment lower segment ratio 1:1
Arm Span normal
No ligamentous laxity or neuro cutaneous markers or pigmentation.
Puffiness of face, hirsuitism, obese, stria over the abdomen present.
There is no craniofacial dysmorphism, subcutaneous nodules, skin rashes.
GAIT is antalgic
LOCAL EXAMINATION
Inspection
Patient is lying comfortably on a hard couch. There is exaggerated lumbar lordosis, hip and knee
extended, patella facing upwards and left foot is more externally rotated than right. ASIS on the
left side is at a higher level. There are no scars, sinuses or swellings, visible. Iliac fossa, inguinal
ligament and Scarpa's triangle appears normal. There are no visible pulsations. Trochanter
cannot be made out. There is no anterior thigh muscle or gluteal wasting.
Palpation
On palpation there is no local rise of temperature, the left ASIS is at a higher level. Normal
resistance is felt over the Scarpa's triangle. There is anterior joint line tenderness on both sides.
The femoral pulsations are felt normally on both sides. Trochanter on the left side is elevated and
more posteriorly placed and is tender on thrust palpation. Posterior joint line tenderness present
on both sides. No mass palpable in the gluteal region.
Movements
On doing the modified Thomas test, there is a fixed flexion deformity of 20 degrees on the left
side with further flexion possible up to 100 degrees, which is limited by pain and spasm, the
range of movement is painful and crepitus is present. On the right side there is a fixed flexion
deformity of 10 degree with further flexion possible unto 120 degree, which is limited by pain
and spasm, the range of movement is painless and there is no associated crepitus. There is no any
axis deviation.
There is an adduction deformity of 20 degrees on the left side with jog of further adduction.
There is an abduction of 20 degrees and adduction of 30 degree on the right side. On flexing the
hip, There is a fixed external rotation deformity of 20 degree on the left side with further external
rotation possible up to 40 degrees. On the right side there is no fixed rotational deformity with
internal rotation of 10 degree and external rotation of 40 degree. On examining the hip in
extension, there is a fixed external rotation deformity of 20 degrees on the left side with further
external rotation possible up to 30 degrees. On the right side there is 10 degree of internal
rotation and 35 degrees of external rotation.
Measurements
There is a limb length discrepancy of 2 cm with left side being shorter. The segmental
measurements are equal on both sides. The circumferential measurements on both sides are
comparable.
On drawing the Shoemakers line the lines converge below the umbilicus towards the left side.
On drawing the Nelaton's line, the tip of the trochanter is above the line on both sides.On
drawing the Chiene's line, the lines converge on the left side.
Trendelenberg test was done on the the right side and is found to be positive. Telescopy test is
negative on both sides.
Sacroiliac joint, spine both knee joint is within normal limits. There is no distal neurovascular
deficit.
SUMMARY
42 year old female with 5 year history of left hip pain and limping and 2 year history of right hip
pain with history of treatment of bronchial asthma for the past 20 years who is functionally
limited to a few steps with inability to squat or sit cross-legged. On examination there is flexion
adduction and external rotation deformity of the left side and flexion deformity of right side with
limitation of internal rotation and abduction.
DIAGNOSIS
Bilateral hip disease with left more affected than the right. Due to secondary osteoarthritis,
probably due to avascular necrosis of both hips.
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
Old perthes
DDH
Q&A
Q1. What are the conditions you should think of when you get a case of bilateral hip
disease?
A. Rheumatoid arthritis
Ankylosing spondylitis
Seronegative Spondyloarthropathy
Bilateral DDH
Bilateral Slip/ Perthes
Osteonecrosis
MED/SED/Trichorhinophalangeal syndrome
Hypothyroidism
Metabolic disorders eg. Morquio
Recently described method is Hamstring shift test, which measures the difference in
popliteal angle of the unaffected side with the affected side in extension and flexion. If there is
exaggerated lumbar lordosis due to fixed flexion deformity of hip, the popliteal angle of the
normal side is more when the affected side is kept straight on the couch.
Q5. Can you use the Kothari’s parallelogram to find out coronal plane deformity in a
bilateral hip case?
A. No. As the limbs in a bilateral hip case with bilateral abduction/adduction deformity
cannot be made parallel, the Kothari’s method cannot be used here.
Q6. What are the problems in measuring limb length in this case?
A. True length should be measured with both the lower limbs in as nearly the same position
with respect to the pelvis after squaring the pelvis. This is not possible in case of bilateral
abduction/adduction deformity.
Apparent length is measured keeping the limbs parallel to each other, which is also not
possible here.
Q7. What is the dose of corticosteroids thought to be associated with AVN?
A. >2 gram of prednisolone, or its equivalent within a period of two to three months.
Q8. You have taken Anteroposterior and lateral x-ray views in this case which shows
collapse of the femoral head. Don't you want to take an MRI to confirm your diagnosis?
A. No.MRI in a case with established collapse on x-ray is unnecessary.
But MRI is the best diagnostic method(99%sensitive and 98% specific) for cases that are
radiographically occult or not obvious on x-ray.
Method for grading size of lesion- Combined necrotic angle described by Kerboul
Small - < 160
Medium – 160 – 200
Large - >200
A major disadvantage of the Ficat and Arlet system is that it has no measurement of lesion size.
Q15. What is Bryant's triangle and what is it's significance in a bilateral hip case?
A. A triangle drawn in order to determine the upward displacement of the trochanter in
fracture of the neck of the femur. A line is drawn around the body at the level of the anterior
superior iliac spines, another line is drawn perpendicular to it as far as the great trochanter of the
femur, and the third line is drawn from the trochanter to the iliac spine. Also called iliofemoral
triangle.
3. What is the difference between level of neck resection in coxa vara and coxa valga?
Ans: Always do keep maximum neck length possible in coxa valga, means high neck cut in
coxa valga and low neck cut in coxa vara.
16. In dysplastic hips what is the special precaution one must take?
Ans: Restore the correct center of rotation of the hip. Reconstruct the acetabulum for the best
support to the cup do high neck cut as there may be coxa valga.
13. If the flexion gap is little loose and extension gap is tight what to do?
Anz: Try to avoid further femoral resection. Up size the femoral component to match the
extension gap. If not balanced go for little more constraint one. Try further tibial resection only
as last option as it will lead to further laxity in flexion.
16. If flexion gap is tight and extension gap is loose what will you do?
Anz: Down size the femur and go for thicker poly. Augment the distal femur.
17. Why do you give 3 degrees external rotation in the femoral cut?
Anz: to make the flexion extension gap rectangular?
18. How does the 3 degrees femoral component external rotation make the flexion
extension gap rectangular?
Anz: The upper tibia is in 3degrees varus anatomically but the cut is made at 90 degrees. The
distal femoral is made parallel to the tbial cut so the extension gap is rectangular. when the
femoral component is external rotated it affects only the flexion gap. So more bone is removed
from the posterior condyle on the medial side. So the flexion gap also become rectangular.
19. Why does one wants to cut the tibia at 90 degrees when the original upper tibia is in
3 degrees varus?
Anz: All varus and valgus positioned tibial components will fail eventually.
20. Will you go for mobile bearing or fixed bearing tibial platform?
Anz: It is a controversy. Start with fixed bearing and go for mobile bearing as one get more
experience.
History
Vertigo, blackouts, drop attacks (s/o cervical spine involvement)
Upper respiratory tract infection (s/o cervical spine involvement)
H/o rheumatoid arthritis, steroids or anti coagulants.
H/o pain and sciatica: Mode of onset
Site of pain - Is there below knee radiation of pain?
Aggravating and relieving factors.
Is it aggravated by walking and standing forcing the patient to sit or stoop forwards?
(Neurogenic claudication)
Diurnal variation
H/o pelvic Inflammatory disease
H/o adolescent backpain (spondylolisthesis) and occupation
H/o dyspnoea, cyanosis or palpitation (s/o thoracic component)
H/o trauma
H/o weakness: Onset Red flag signs in LBA
Loss of weight and appetite
Progression Fever
Severity Nocturnal pain
Diurnal variation Rest pain
Assoc. with involvement of other joints Bilateral sciatica
H/o fasciculations Sphincter disturbance
Age less than 15 or
Abnormal movements More than 50
H/o Numbness: H/o trauma, malignancy
Onset Gross motor weakness
Progression
Site
Dermatomal distribution
Difficulty in walking
Difficulty in washing face in darkness (s/o ataxia)
Perianal sensory loss
H/o Bowel and bladder involvement:
Retention
Overflow incontinence
Bladder sensation present or no
Associated h/o renal, cardiac or GIT complaints
Associated constitutional symptoms
If there is presence of deformity:
Onset,
Progression
Onset of menarche
H/o Polio,
Immunization history.
Full Developmental history (Antenatal, natal and postnatal)
R/o any neuromuscular cause of the deformity.
Any family History
R/o Any h/o infection Tuberculosis
General Examination
Height
Weight
US/LS ratio
Arm span
Gait and Posture
Abnormal movements
Neurocutaneous markers like ash leaf macule/ neurofibromas
Local examination
Inspection
From behind the patient
Head tilt and neck tilt
Hairline and level of shoulders
Level of scapulae and any rib hump
Alignment of the spine coronally
Level of the iliac crest
Any swellings or cold abscess
Any features of spina bifida occulta (hairy nevus/ mole/dimple/lipoma)
Any step
From the side
Exaggerated lumbar lordosis
Shape of the chest wall
Rib hump
From Front
Level of nipples and breast folds
Level of the ASIS
Pot belly
Palpation
Tenderness over the spinous process
Point tenderness
Twist tenderness
Thrust tenderness
Feel for any cold abscesses per abdomen as well as superficial
Any step deformity as in spondylolisthesis
Movements
All movements of the cervical spine, dorsal and lumbar spine
Schober’s test
Measurements
Chest expansion
Limb length discrepancy
From occipital protuberance to tip of coccyx
12th rib to iliac crest
Modified schoebers test
Special tests
SLRT/Lasegue test for lumbar spine
Spurling test for cervical spine
Adson test or Roos test for thoracic outlet syndrome
Forward bending test for rib hump
Neurological examination
Higher mental functions
Cranial nerves
Motor system- Bulk, Tone, Power, Reflexes, Abnormal movements/ Fasciculations
Sensory system- Fine touch, crude touch, vibration, temperature sense, position sense, 2-point
discrimination, stereognosis
Reflexes- Under motor system
Autonomic system
Coordination
Muscle charting- Under motor system
Q&A
Q2. How do you diagnose or what are the signs of upper lumbar disc herniation?
A. A positive femoral nerve stretch test (FNST)
Patient in prone position keeping hand on popliteal fossa, a sudden flexion of the knee
produces pain along ant aspect of thigh.
Q4. Which disc can produce a false positive finding in MRI? Which is the largest disc?
What percentage of the disc contains water?
A. L4 L5disc is the largest disc (so it can produce a false positive test)
60-65% of the disc contains water
Q14. How do you differentiate between referred pain and radicular pain?
A. Radicular pain always extend distal to knee along the course of nerve
Referred pain is felt in low back, sacroiliac region or posterior aspect of thigh.
A. After a positive SLR, slightly flex the knee to relieve pain. Now pressing at popliteal
fossa produces pain either proximally or distally along the course of nerve.
17. SCOLIOSIS
Q&A
Q&A
Q1. What are the common levels of involvement of spinal tuberculosis?
A. Thoracic spine -35- 40 %
Thoracolumbar spine – 25 – 30 %
Lumbosacral spine- 25- 30 %
Cervical spine – 4- 5 %
Q16. What are the regimens used for treating spinal tuberculosis?
A. Hong Kong regimen - Radical surgery
Kenyan regimen - Only ATT
BMRC regimen - Middle path regimen
Q18. What are the indications for surgery in Middle path regimen?
A. Not responding to ATT after 4-8 weeks of treatment for debridement and biopsy
Progressive neurological deficit
Neurological deficit developing while on treatment
Worsening of neurological deficit during treatment
Kyphosis more than 30 degree
Spinal tumour syndrome
Q19. What are the surgical options for treating D/L tuberculosis?
A. Anterior decompression and fusion
Anterolateral decompression
Costotransvesectomy
Transpedicular decompression and posterior fusion
Rarely laminectomy - in posterior type
19. Spondylolisthesis
1: What is spondylolisthesis?
Spondylolisthesis is a condition of the spine whereby one of the vertebra slips forward or
backward compared to the next vertebra. Forward slippage of one vertebra on another is referred
to as anterolisthesis, while backward slippage is referred to as retrolisthesis. Spondylolisthesis
can lead to a deformity of the spine as well as a narrowing of the spinal canal (central spinal
stenosis) or compression of the exiting nerve roots (foraminal stenosis).
Spondylolisthesis. Oblique projection radiograph shows the presence of bilateral pars defects
(arrows), with an appearance resembling a Scottie dog with a collar. (The collar is the pars
defect.)
Spondylolisthesis. Diagram in the oblique projection shows the components of the vertebrae that
result in the appearance of a Scottie dog with a collar.
Spondylolisthesis. Sagittal CT reconstruction image shows the pars defect along with grade 1
spondylolisthesis (arrow).
With spondylolysis, CT is performed as close as possible to an angle that is 90° to the level of
interest. CT scans typically demonstrate a horizontally oriented defect in the pars, which
interrupts the normally complete bony ring of the posterior elements.
Spondylolisthesis is evaluated best on lateral tomogram, but it can be suggested in patients with
spinal stenosis in the absence of disk pathology, posterior hypertrophic changes, or a
congenitally narrow spinal canal. One typically looks for an elongated spinal canal (as seen in
the images below).
Contra-indications:
- Patients who have had symptoms for > 1 year or those who are asymptomatic;
- Bone scans are not indicated once the lesion has become established
Examination of shoulder
By Dr Rajesh Purushothaman
Shoulder symptoms may be due intrinsic causes or referred causes due to spine, thorax or
abdomen pathology. Hence it is important to rule out referred causes for shoulder pain.
History
Should include age, handedness, occupational and recreational activities and the shoulder
symptoms. In patients with pain; ask for the exact site, duration, onset, progress, character,
radiation, associated symptoms, aggravating factors and relieving factors. In case of left sided
shoulder pain ask for cardiac symptoms. Patient should be asked to point out the site of pain with
a single finger. If site is over the lateral arm especially during overhead activity, the cause is
likely to be rotator cuff pathology or impingement. Superior pain especially on adduction is
suggestive of acromioclavicular pathology. Anterior shoulder pain may be due to long head of
biceps pathology. Deep shoulder pain is likely to be due to glenohumeral pathology or labral
lesions.
In patients with instability; ask for the duration, onset, frequency, precipitating posture or
activity, position of shoulder after the dislocation, and how it gets corrected after an episode.
Also ask for history of epilepsy as posterior instability is more likely in such patients. Also look
for history suggestive of voluntary dislocation.
Glenohumeral instability has been classified according to the cause and direction. Cause can be
classified into traumatic and atraumatic. Atraumatic instability develops either due to laxity or
overuse. Direction of instability can be classified into anterior, posterior, inferior and
multidirectional. If history of trauma is not present then careful history of occupational and
recreational activities must be made to identify overuse. Position of arm at the moment of
instability is very helpful in the identification of the direction of instability. In anterior
instability, the shoulder will be abducted, externally rotated and extended. In posterior
instability, the shoulder is adducted, internally rotated and flexed. In inferior instability, the arm
is abducted and the hand is supported over the head.
Anterior instability causes pain during late cocking phase of throwing due to anteroinferior
capsule laxity. Posterior instability causes pain during follow through phase. Patients with
anterior instability may present with dead arm syndrome; paralysing pain in the maximally
externally rotated, abducted and extended position.
Different age groups have different causes for their presentation. Patients <25 years present due
to traumatic dislocations, recurrent instability or acromioclavicular pathology. Adults below 40
years present due to impingement, frozen shoulder or ACJ arthritis; and those over 40 years
present due to rotator cuff impingement or tear and osteoarthritis of glenohumeral or
acromioclavicular joint. The steps of physical examination of shoulder is determined by patient's
presenting complaints and history. The entire region from the cervical spine to the hand should
be examined.
Inspection
Patient should be dressed in such a manner that shoulder can be assessed fully. Observe the
posture and the bony and soft tissue contour of both shoulders and look for any asymmetry.
Observe whether the pelvis is level and the spine is straight as their malalignment may cause
secondary shoulder abnormality.
A step deformity may be seen at the ACJ in dislocations of the ACJ. Contour of clavicle may be
altered in case of clavicle malunion or nonunion. Popeye sign of abnormal prominence of biceps
is seen in patients with long head of biceps rupture. Abnormal contour of anterior auxiliary fold
and pectoralis major is seen patients with pectoralis major tendon rupture and Poland syndrome.
Wasting of supraspinatus and infraspinatus may be seen.
Palpation
Feel for local rise of temperature. Stand on the back of the patient and palpate the structures of
the shoulder using the Kochers method of palpation starting at the sternoclavicular joint and
moving laterally over the clavicle, ACJ, coracoid, spine of scapula and down the humerus. Look
for tenderness, irregularity, thickening, defect, abnormal mobility etc. Biceps tendon should be
palpated in its groove anteriorly.
The tenderness over the glenohumeral joint is elicited anteriorly over a point 1cm inferior and
lateral to the coracoid process and posteriorly over the point 2cm medial and inferior to the angle
of acromion. Diffuse tenderness over the trapezius and interscapular area may be seen in patients
with shoulder instability and scapular dysrrhythmia due to abnormal shoulder biomechanics.
Movements
Assess range of motion using the recommendations of the American Shoulder and Elbow
Surgeons Research Committee 1. Abduction is tested in the scapular plane (30 degree-
anteriorly)and not in the coronal axis of the body. Ideally patient should be stripped to the waist
and examiner should stand behind the patient and both shoulders are abducted simultaneously. In
the resting position the vertebral border of both scapula should be equidistant from the vertebral
column. Both scapula should move symmetrically when the arm is abducted, asymmetrical
movement is noted as scapular dyskinesis. Normally the ratio of glenohumeral to scapulothoracic
movement on abduction is 2:1.
Shrug sign is seen in patients with supraspinatus dysfunction, the patient shrugs at the beginning
of abduction to substitute glenohumeral abduction by supraspinatus with scapulothoracic motion.
If there is abnormal prominence of vertebral border then there is dynamic scapular winging.
Maximum achievable angle between the humerus and thorax is recorded as shoulder elevation.
Internal and external rotation are measured in 90 flexion of elbow and with arm by the side of
body and in 90 abduction of shoulder. Rotations are better tested in the supine position after
applying pressure over the anterior shoulder to fix the scapula.
Strength testing
Strength of rotator cuff muscles are measured. Supraspinatus is assessed in the empty can
position; 90 abduction of shoulder with elbow straight and shoulder in the fully internally rotated
position with the thumb pointing downwards and the patient is asked to abduct further against
resistance. Strength of infraspinatus is measured with the arm in 90º abduction, elbow at 90º
flexion and the patient is asked to externally rotate against resistance.
Special tests
Examiner position- Stand next to the patient with one hand over the top of shoulder and other
hand holding the patient’s arm.
Patient position- Standing.
Joint position- Arm by the side of body
Procedure- Stabilise the scapula with one hand, passively flex the shoulder fully and then push
further.
Interpretation- Pain is due to rotator cuff impingement. Test is 79% sensitive and 53% specific.
Inject 10 ml of 1% lidocaine into the subacromial space using a sterile technique. Then ask the
patient to actively abduct. Relief of pain for the duration of the anesthetic effect is confirmatory
of impingement.
Sulcus sign
Described by Neer and Foster.
Patient position- Sitting
Joint position- Arm by the side and hand resting in the lap of patient
Procedure- Hold the elbow of the patient with one hand and then stabilise the shoulder with other
hand and then apply longitudinal traction.
Interpretation- Appearance of a gap more than the other side below the acromion suggest inferior
capsular laxity. It is indicative of multidirectional instability. Grading – 1+ -0-1cm, 2+- 1-2cm,
3+- >2cm.
Recent modification- Now externally rotate the shoulder, if the gap persists then rotator interval
is likely to be defective.
Glenohumeral laxity is the ability to translate the humeral head to glenoid rim and glenohumeral
instability is the unwanted translation of humeral head on the glenoid that compromises patient
comfort and shoulder function. Multidirectional instability is instability in two or more directions
and the hallmark of inferior instability is positive sulcus sign.
Apprehension test
If apprehension is present with previous test, repeat the test with posteriorly directed pressure.
Absence of apprehension is confirmatory of anterior instability. This test is the gold standard for
the diagnosis of anterior instability. With apprehension as the criteria for diagnosis; it shows
85% accuracy, 68% specificity, 100% sensitivity, 100% positive predictive value and 78%
negative predictive value.
Jerk test
Patient position- Supine
Joint position- Shoulder abducted to 90, elbow flexed to 90.
Procedure- Grasp elbow. Axially load the shoulder. Adduct the shoulder horizontally across the
body
Interpretation- Clunk and pain in presence of posterior instability. Return to abducted position
may produce another jerk due to relocation of joint.
Reliability – 90% sensitivity, 85% specificity, 72% positive predictive value and 94% negative
predictive value. 10
Ask the patient to actively abduct the shoulder in the scapular plane with the elbow in extension
with the shoulder in full internal rotation and the thumb pointing down.4 Reinard identified by
electrical studies that more fibres of supraspinatus are active if the test is done with the thumb
pointing up (Full can test) and may be more useful.5. Jobs test has 75% accuracy in detection of
supraspinatus tear. 6
Integrity of subscapularis is assessed separately for the upper fibres and lower fibres.
Lower fibres are tested by the lift-off test; ask the patient to place the dorsum of the hand against
the small of back and then lift the hand posteriorly away from the body against resistance.
Inability to lift the hand indicate subscapularis tear.
Upper fibres are tested by the belly press test; patient is asked to place his palm against the
umbilicus and push against the abdomen. Inability to do this indicate subscapularis tear.
Drop sign
Done to detect infraspinatus tear. Patient is asked to lie in the lateral decubitus position with the
affected side up. Flex the shoulder and elbow to 90 degrees. Hold the wrist and externally rotate
to the maximum. Now release the wrist and ask the patient to hold the limb in external rotation.
In presence of infraspinatus tear, he will not be able to do this.
Numerous tests are available, but they are of 2 types; active tests which try to recreate the
torsional traction force that caused the injury or passive tests that exert compressive stress on the
labrum. O’Brien test is an active test and crank test is a passive test.
Pathology may be tendinitis, tear, instability of the long head of biceps or synovitis of its sheath.
Speed test
Yergason test
7. Tests for acromioclavicular joint
Horizontal adduction test- The shoulder is passively elevated to horizontal and the arm is
adducted across the body beyond the full range. Ask the patient if there is pain and the site of
pain. If pain is located over the ACJ then the test is positive for ACJ pathology. Test is 77%
sensitive and 79% specific with an accuracy of 79%
Spurling test
Patient position – Sitting
Joint position – Neck flexed forward and tilted laterally.
Procedure – Apply axial load over the head.
Interpretation- Reproduction of patient’s symptom of radiating pain indicate cervical root
pathology.
Further Reading
Richards RR, An KN, Bigiliani LU et al: A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder
function. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1994; 3:347-52
Chronopoulos E, Kim TK, Park HB, et al. Diagnostic value of physical tests for isolated chronic
acromioclavicular lesions. Am J Sports Med . 2004;32(3):655-661
Hegedus EJ, Goode A, Campbell S, et al. Physical examination tests of the shoulder: a
systematic review with meta-analysis of individual tests. Br J Sports Med . 2008;42(2):80-92
Jobe FW, Jobe CM. Painful athletic injuries of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res . 1983;(173):
117-124.
Reinold MM, Macrina LC, Wilk KE, et al. Electromyographic analysis of the supraspinatus and
deltoid muscles during 3 common rehabilitation exercises. J Athl Train . 2007;42(4):464-469.
Itoi E, Kido T, Sano A, et al. Which is more useful, the “full can test” or the “empty can test,” in
detecting the torn supraspinatus tendon? Am J Sports Med . 1999;27(1):65-68.
Gerber C, Krushell RJ. Isolated rupture of the tendon of the subscapularis muscle: clinical
features in 16 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br . 1991;73(3):389-394.
Harryman DT 2nd, Sidles JA, Harris SL, Matsen FA 3rd. The role of the rotator interval capsule
in passive motion and stability of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am . 1992;74(1):53-66
Speer KP, Hannafi n JA, Altchek DW, Warren RF. An evaluation of the shoulder relocation test.
Am J Sports Med . 1994;22(2):177-183
Kim SH, Park JC, Park JS, Oh I. Painful jerk test: a predictor of success in nonoperative
treatment of posteroinferior instability of the shoulder. Am J Sports Med . 2004;32(8):1849-1855
O’Brien SJ, Pagnani MJ, Fealy S, et al: The active compression test: A new and effective test for
diagnosing labral tears and acromio-clavicular joint abnormality. Am J Sports Med 26: 610–613,
1998
Parentis MA, Mohr KJ, ElAttrache NS: Disorders of the superior labrum: Review andtreatment
guidelines. Clin Orthop 400: 77–87, 2002
Written by
Dr Rajesh Purushothaman,
Associate Professor,
Kerala, India.
http://www.learningorthopaedics.com
[email protected]
21. UNSTABLE SHOULDER
Q&A
Q1. What are the important points in history taking in a case of RDS?
Stability tests
Shift and load test (Drawer test) –one hand along the edge of the scapula, grasp
the humeral head with the other hand, apply compression and shift anteriorly and posteriorly
Sulcus test -- The limb is pulled distally and observing for a sulcus between the
humerus and acromion
0 degree --- indicates rotator cuff laxity
45 degree—indicates ligament laxity
Grade 0 to 3
1+ <1cm subluxation
2+ 1-2 cm subluxation
3+ >2 cm subluxation
Anterior apprehension test (Crank test) -- Done with the patient supine. Abduct
the arm to 90 and externally rotate. If the patient has anterior instability, he will resist placement
into this position. If positive do, Jobe relocation test.
Posterior clunk test – shoulder 90 degree abduction, forward flexed and internally
rotated and posterior stress is given along the humerus.
Shoulder lachman test – Left hand grasps the proximal humerus and right hand
lightly holds the elbow. Forward pressure is given from the posterior aspect of shoulder and the
amount of translation is graded.
Andrews’s test – This test is similar to anterior apprehension test but the patient is
examined in prone position and hence eliminates the learned response to apprehension test
Fulcrum test – Examiners’ hand is under the glenohumeral joint and downward
pressure is given at the elbow. The test is positive when the patient becomes apprehensive (i.e.
when the head is about to dislocate)
Q6. What are the pathological conditions that may predispose to RDS?
A. Bankart lesion, Hill- Sachs lesion, SLAP lesion and Glenoid rim fracture.
STRESS VIEWS
Amount of glenohumeral translation with loading
Inferior translation- AP with sulcus test
Anterior: Axillary with fulcrum test
Posterior: Axillary with push pull test
Views seeking underlying pathology
Direction of instability
Contributing factors
AP in plane of scapula & Axillary view
Ant & post lip #
New bone formation
Glenoid rim changes
Bony lesion in ant glenoid rim (ax lat view)
# post glenoid rim( ax lat view)
WEST POINT VIEW
Patient prone
Involved shoulder raised by 7.5cm
Cassette :sup aspect of shoulder
Beam : 25 downward & 25 medial : centered at axilla
Apical oblique view (Garth)
Scapula flat on cassette
Beam : perpendicular to cassette 45 to coronal plane & 45 caudally centering
coracoid
HILL SACH`S VIEW
Marked IR
STRYKER NOTCH VIEW
Patient supine
Cassette : under shoulder
Palm on top of head: elbow upward
X ray :10 cephalad centering coracoid
Best view for #Coracoid
+ assesses posterolateral defect
For Microtraumatic lesions with subtle anterior instability and with no significant labral damage
--- Altchek procedure (capsular reefing )
Recurrent Posterior dislocation with large reverse Hill Sach lesion – Modified McLaughlin
Procedure.
Elderly patient with recurrent seizures and dislocation – medical management + Bankarts’+
Puttiplatt
For AMBRI – Rehabilitation is the main treatment option. Neer and Foster lateral capsular shift
may be resorted to in selected cases.
To eliminate inferior laxity, closure of rotator cuff interval is indicated.
Posterior instability with inferior instability is treated with posterior shift of the
capsuloligamentous complex.
Q17. How does posterior dislocation differ from anterior dislocation?
A. Association with seizures and shock
Associated with lesser tuberosity fractures unlike GT in anterior dislocation
Much less common
Lesser risk of recurrence
Immobiled with gunslinger type brace rather than sling and swathe.
Q19. An 18 year old female swimmer reports shoulder instability. On physical examination,
she has systemic, hyperlaxity, positive responses on anterior and posterior drawer tests, and a
positive sulcus sign. What would be the ideal initial line of management?
A. This patient has multidirectional instability and atraumatic instability. She needs
aggressive rehabilitation for atleast 3-6 months before ever considering surgery. Rotator cuff
strengthening is the mainstay of physical therapy efforts.thermal capsuloraphy has been shown to
have a high risk of recurrent instability in this population. These patients rarely have a Bankart
lesion. Ultrasonography and other imaging modalities have a limited role in patients with
multidirectional instability.
History:
General points regarding the trauma (especially note mode of trauma, treatment, h/o massage,
complications)
Any h/o septic arthritis, haemophilia, tuberculosis, Hansen’s disease, morning stiffness
Symptoms of ulnar neuritis.
Mention the handedness of the patient.
Pre requisites
Both elbows examined in identical position
Patient stands / sits on a stool
Proper exposure
Inspection
Examine from the front, back and the sides
Attitude & deformity
Abnormal prominences
Swellings (localised – olecranon bursa/rheumatoid nodule, diffuse - extra and intra articular
swellings)
Scars or sinuses, previous surgery, steroid injections
Wasting of the muscles
Paraolecranon fossae
Palpation
Palpate the following and look for thickening, irregularity, stepping or tenderness
Medial and lateral supracondylar ridges
Medial and lateral condyle
Radial head
Mass in the cubital fossa - to r/o myositis ossificans
Three point bony relationship (compare with opposite side)
Supratrochlear/epitrochlear lymph nodes
Ulnar nerve in the cubital tunnel
Anconeus triangle (b/w the olecranon , radial head and the lateral epicondyle)
Collateral ligaments
Movements
Flexion & Extension
Supination & Pronation (remember to keep arms adducted by the trunk)
One must have good idea about the muscles primarily responsible for the particular
movement, their nerve supply, root value etc
CASE PRESENTATION
History
10 year old female admitted with complaints of deformity of right elbow of 2 years duration.
There is no history of pain and there is no limitation of daily activities. There was a history of
fall from a tree 2 years back and she sustained an injury to the right elbow which was treated by
a traditional bone setter with bandaging and massage for 1 month. One month after the treatment,
parents noticed the deformity of the right elbow which is not progressing. There is no history of
any other joint involvement or any difficulty in using the hand for her daily activities. She is
attending fifth standard.
General Examination
There is no ligamentous laxity, no deformities on any other joint. She is moderately built
and nourished.
Local examination
On inspection there is an inward deviation of the forearm at the elbow and hyper
extension at the elbow joint. There no scars or sinuses. There is no muscle wasting. There is an
abnormal prominence seen on the lateral aspect of the elbow and medial condyle appears less
prominent. Olecranon appears normal and the attachment of the triceps appears to be more
medial. Paraolecranon fossae appear normal.
On palpation there is no local rise of temperature. There is no joint line tenderness. There is
thickening of the medial and lateral supracondylar ridges. Medial and lateral condyle, radial
head, olecranon is felt normally. The three point bony relationship is maintained. Ulnar nerve is
felt in the cubital tunnel and does not subluxate on flexion.
On taking segmental measurements the arm and forearm segments are comparable with the left
side. Intercondylar distance is comparable on both sides.
There is hyper extension of 20 degrees with limitation of flexion up to120 degrees. Carrying
angle is 10 degree varus. Supination and pronation at the elbow is within normal limits. There is
no varus or valgus instability.
On examining the right shoulder there is a limitation of external rotation of 10 degrees and
exaggerated internal rotation of 10 degrees compared to the left side. Wrist is normal.
Examination of the ulnar, median and radial nerve is within normal limits.
Diagnosis
Cubits varus deformity of the right elbow most probably due to a malunited supracondylar
fracture of the humerus.
Q&A
Q1. What is cubitus varus?
A. A deformity of the elbow resulting in a decreased carrying angle (so that, with the arm
extended at the side and the palm facing forward,there is deviation of the forearm toward the
midline of the body. Cubitus is the Latin word for elbow and varus means angled inward.
Q2. What are the components of elbow joint
Humeroulnar joint , it is a simple hinge-joint, and allows of movements of flexion and
extension only.
Humeroradial joint, it is a hinge-joint.
Proximal radioulnar joint
Q3. What is carrying angle?
A. It is the angle formed by the long axis of the arm and long axis of forearm with the elbow
extended and forearm supinated. It is because the medial column of the humerus is longer than
the lateral column. This angle permits the forearms to clear the hips in swinging movements
during walking, and is important when carrying objects
In males normal carrying angle is 5-10°and in females it is 10-15°
If carrying angle is exaggerated, it is called cubitus valgus
Reduction, neutralisation or reversal of carrying angle is cubitus varus
Q9. What are the other causes for cubitus varus deformity?
A. Congenital
Malunited intercondylar fracture
Malunited medial condyle fracture
Trochlear osteonecrosis
Malunited fracture lateral condyle
Q22. What are the treatment options available for supracondylar fractures?
A. Dameron listed, depending on the type of fracture, four basic types of treatment:
(1) Side-arm skin traction,
(2) Overhead skeletal traction,
(3) Closed reduction and casting with or without percutaneous pinning, and
(4) Open reduction and internal fixation
Q28. What are the types of osteotomy for correction of cubitus varus?
A. Lateral closing wedge osteotomy
Medial opening wedge osteotomy with a bone graft - King and Secor
Oblique osteotomy with derotation
Step-cut osteotomy - Derosa and Graziano
Step-cut translation osteotomy and fixation with a y-shaped humeral plate - Kim
If a more extensive osteotomy is needed
Dome osteotomy
Q29. When will you plan for osteotomy?
A. At least one year after fracture, this provides adequate time for remodeling of bone and
regaining of tissue equilibrium.
Q30. What are the complications of osteotomy?
A. Stiffness of joint
Nerve injury
Persistent deformity
Non union
Malunion
Q31. What are the differences between French osteotomy and Modified French
osteotomy (Bellemore?)
Q33. How do you confirm medial tilt clinically in case of cubitus varus due to malunited
supracondylar fracture?
Ask the patient to bring both the elbows flexed to 90 degrees towards MIDLINE.note the
position of epicondylar tips – the one with medial tilt will be located HIGHER up
Q 34.In the above case, how will you confirm medial (internal) rotation?
Keep both elbows flexed at 90 degrees with arms by the side of the chest. Ask the patient to
externally rotate both the shoulders. The external rotation of the shoulder on the affected side
will be limited more or less by the same degree as the medial (internal) rotation at the elbow
Yamamoto method - "With the subject bending slightly forward, the upper limb is held at the
side and then positioned behind the back with the elbow at 90 degree flexion and the shoulder
held at the maximum extension position. In this position the midline of the forearm gets exposed
for inspection by the examiner, who stands behind the subject, applying maximum internal
rotation to the subject's upper limb around the long axis of the humerus. When no internal
rotation deformity of the humerus is present, there is no change in the forearm position. The
horizontal plane of the back is parallel with the midline of the forearm. Conversely, in children
with the internal rotation deformity of cubitus varus, a certain abnormal angle is formed between
the horizontal plane of the back and the midline of the forearm. The angle is designated the
internal rotation angle."
CASE PRESENTATION 2
18 year old female admitted with complaints of deformity of right elbow of 3 years duration.
There is no history of pain and there is no limitation of daily activities. There was a history of
fall 3 years back and she sustained an injury to the right elbow which was treated by a traditional
bone setter with bandaging and massage for 1 month. One month after the treatment, parents
noticed the deformity of the right elbow which is not progressing. There is no history of any
other joint involvement or any difficulty in using the hand for her daily activities.
On examination
There is no ligamentous laxity,no deformities on any other joint. She is moderately built and
nourished.
Local examination
On inspection there is a cubitus valgus deformity of the forearm at the elbow. There is a flexion
deformity of 10 degrees.There are no scars or sinuses. There is no muscle wasting. There is an
abnormal prominence seen on the medial aspect of the elbow.
On palpation there is no local rise of temperature. There is no joint line tenderness. The lateral
lateral condyle is thickened and irregular.Medial and lateral supracondylar ridges, Medial
condyle, radial head, olecranon is felt normally. The three bony relationship is altered with
lateral epicondyle lying at a higher level. Ulnar nerve is felt in the cubital tunnel and does not
subluxate on flexion. There is painless abnormality with crepitus over the lateral condyle.
The acromion to lateral condyle distance is decreased by 2 cm on the right side. The inter
condylar distance is increased by 1 cm. There is a fixed flexion deformity of 10 degrees with
further flexion possible upto 140 degrees.Varus stress test is positive. Supination and pronation
at the elbow is within normal limits. There is no distal vascular deficit.
Wrist is normal. Examination of the ulnar, median and radial nerve is within normal limits.
Q&A
Q3. Why do you say this is a case of non union of fracture lateral condyle?
A. Three bony point relationship is disturbed
Thickening of lateral supracondylar ridge
Flexion deformity of elbow
Abnormal mobility of lateral condyle
Varus stress test positive
Q7. What is the cause for tardy ulnar nerve palsy in cubitus valgus?
A. Stretching of nerve due to progressive medial angulation
Perineuritis due to friction
Adhesion due to entrapment of nerve in cubital tunnel
History
Handedness
Occupation eg. Industrial worker
Vascular Ischaemia:
Infection :Hansen/Polio.
Compressive myelopathy:
Metabolic : Diabetes, gaucher, lead poisoning (purely motor)
Amylodosis:
Alcoholism,
Trauma – open/closed.
Drug induced.
Any improvement in symptoms.
Rheumatoid arthritis: Mononeuritis multiplex
Inability to wear slippers in case of lower limb lesions
General Examination:
Nerve swelling, beading, thickening,
Position of the distal aspect of the extremity.
Site of scar, Ulcers, smoothness or dryness of the skin.
Absence of callus.
Temperature changes.
Hypopigmented patches (Hansen’s disease)
Examination Pattern:
Differentiate between UMN and LMN
UMN LMN
Plantar: Upgoing Absent
Tone Increased Absent
Reflexes: Initially absent, later increases Absent
Power : Group of muscles inv. Individual muscles
Wasting Mild or seen very late. Gross Wasting.
History:
History similar to plexus injuries
History of # scapula ribs, clavicle.
Rate of progression of deformity.
Any improvement in symptoms,
Difficulty in vision in the evenings (s/o Horner’s)
In Obstetric palsy, antenatal / natal / and post natal history.
Examination findings
Similar to examination of peripheral nerves,
Palpate along clavicle, scapula and along first rib.
Examination Pattern:
Check for plantar reflex, long tract signs and serratus anterior (Root lesion) and/or horners sign
and paraesthesia along the paraspinal muscles:
If positive : then Preganglionic;
If negative : then check Supraspinatus (ie integrity of the Trunk via the suprascapular nerve)
If negative then check:
a) Musculocutaneous nerve: lateral cord
b) Ulnar nerve :Medial Cord
c) Radial nerve : Posterior nerve
Diagnosis
a) Post traumatic/ obstetric
b) pre/ post ganglionic
c) Recovering/ non recovering
d) Upper plexus/ lower plexus / pan Plexus
e) Deformity if any
C7 Finger Extensor
Wrist Flexor Triceps Middle finger
CASE PRESENTATION
This 35 year old right handed manual laborer presented with weakness of right hand for 8
months following fall from bike, at that time his right shoulder hit on the ground. He was on
ayurvedic treatment for the last 8months, with no improvement in his condition. Now the patient
is not able to do his day today activities like eating, combing hair, buttoning the shirt etc.
Well cooperative patient, right arm kept on side of the body, elbow extended, forearm pronated
and wrist is semiflexed, with appreciable wasting of supraspinatous, deltoid, biceps, triceps and
forearm muscles. Ther is no facial dismorphism, pupil equal and reacting to light,
supraclavicular fossa and posterior triangle of neck normal, clavicle shape is normal.
Bulk and tone of the shoulder, arm and forearm muscles reduced. Rhomboids and Serratous
anterior and has grade zero power. Supraspinatous, Deltoid, Biceps, Brachialis, Dorsiflexors of
wrist has a power of grade zero. Triceps, wrist palmar flexors has grade 3 power. Hand grip and
intrinsic have grade 5 power. Biceps reflex and supinator reflex is absent, Triceps reflex is
diminished, plantar is downgoing.sensation over the lateral aspect of arm forearm and middle
finger is absent.
Trapezius and lattismusdorsi has grade 5 power (required for reconstructive procedures)
Shoulder, elbow and wrist has full range of passive movement.
DIAGNOSIS: RIGHT SIDED , POST TRAUMATIC, CLOSED , UNRECOVERED
PREGANGLIONIC ,BRACHIAL PLEXUS INJURY WITH COMPLETE INVOLVEMENT
OF C5 AND C6 ROOTS AND PARTIAL INVOLVEMENT OF C7 ROOTS.
Q&A
Q4. What is the deformity that seen in Erb’s palsy and Klumpky’s palsy.
A. Erbs- police man tip deformity
Klumpky- claw hand
Q9. How will you grade the shoulder deformity in Erb’s palsy?
A. WATTER’S classification
Normal glenohumeral joint
Minimal hypoplasia
Posterior subluxation
Presence of false glenoid
Flattening of head of humerus
Infantile dislocation
Proximal humeral growth arrest.
Test abductor digiti minimi, and test 1st dorsal interossei – all three are palpable and
power can be assessed.
Egawa test / Pitres-Testut sign – test 2nd and 3rd dorsal interossei
Card test – tests palmar interossei
Froment’s sign / Book test/ Newspaper sign/ Bunnell’s “O”sign – tests adductor
pollicis
Pollock’s sign – inability to flex the distal phalanges of ring and little fingers
Wartenberg’s sign – inability to adduct the extended little finger to the extended ring
finger
Inspection findings – ulnar claw hand, guttering of intermetacarpal spaces, loss of metacarpal
arch, loss of hypothenar eminence, trophic changes tip of little finger, wasting of medial aspect
of forearm
7. What are the basic hand functions lost in ulnar nerve palsy?
Loss of lateral or key pinch of the thumb
Loss of grasp – as the sequence of finger flexion is reversed (normally MP joint of the
fingers flex followed by the IP joints which gets reversed in Ulnar nerve palsy – hence the
objects are pushed away instead of being grasped)
10. List the anomalous innervation patterns seen in ulnar nerve lesions?
Martin –Gruber anastomosis: seen in proximal forearm. Between median nerve or its
anterior interosseous branch and ulnar nerve. 15% occurrence.
Riche-Cannieu anastomosis: seen in the hand. Between the motor branch of ulnar nerve
and recurrent branch of the median nerve.
Key muscles to be tested to localize the level: triceps, ECRL, Ext digitorum, EPL
5. What are the main functional deficits with high median nerve palsy?
Loss of active pronation, loss of opposition of thumb and loss of digital flexion of thumb,
index and middle fingers, resulting in weak grip.
Strong static Tinel at injury site+ no advancing Tinel distally = no chance of recovery
Reducing static Tinel at injury+ distally advancing Tinel=good chance of recovery
Strong static Tinel at injury+ distally advancing Tinel=poor chance of useful recovery
7. How will you express the diagnosis in a peripheral nerve injury case?
Nerve with side of lesion
Age of patient with duration of injury
Etiology
Level of injury
Complete /incomplete
Recovering / not recovering
Type of nerve injury
Associated bony and soft tissue injury
Complications
History
UMN Cortical Lesions:
H/o seizures, auditory or visual abnormality.
Whether the child is mentally retarded.
H/o any basal ganglia lesions
H/o jaundice (neonatal Jaundice causes basal ganglia lesions)
H/o Incoordination
H/o Bulbar involvement: Change of voice, dysphagia.
Spinal Cord Involvement:
Extramedullary: More radicular pain
March of paralysis
Intramedullary: More dense lesions
Bladder Involvement.
b/l symmetric involvement of lower limb
Dissociative anaesthesia: loss of spinothalamic sensation with preservation of the dorsal
column sensation. There will also be loss of motor power and reflexes with upgoing plantar.
Enquire about the order of paralysis
Cerebral palsy was first described by English surgeon William John LIttle in 1862. It was then
known as Little's Disease for decades. The term was originated by Freud.
Q17. What are the current operations for the valgus foot in skeletally immature child?
A. Mosca procedure ( open wedge interfacet calcaneal osteotomy)
Grice green procedure (Sub talar extra articular arthrodesis)
Q23. What is the most common type of hand deformity and how can it be corrected?
A. Thumb in palm deformity.
Correction entails the release of adductor pollisis at its insertion, release of first dorsal
interosseous muscles, fixation or fusion of the hypermobile MCP jointand rerouting of the EPL
tendon
Tibial torsion is the angle between the transverse axis of the knee and the transmalleolar axis.
The tibia is internally rotated at birth. Internal tibial torsion is 5 degrees at birth and gets
corrected to neutral by 4-5 years of age. The tibia then gradually becomes externally rotated and
reach the adult value of 20-25 degrees of external rotation by the age of 8 years.
Femoral anteversion is the angle between the transcondylar axis and the longitudinal axis of
the femoral neck in the horizontal plane. Femoral anteversion is 40 degrees at birth and
reaches the adult value of less than 15 degrees by the age of 8 years. It produces intoeing gait
which gradually increases during the first five years of life due to summation of deformities.
It gets corrected by 8 years of age
1. Is there a deformity?
History
From the history try to understand the relevant details about the deformity, look hints that help
identify the cause and understand the secondary effects of the deformity and its impact on
function. History should start with the following questions.
• How long the deformity is present?
• How did it start?
• How is it progressing?
• Any associated symptoms?
• Is there any history of trauma or infection?
In children get perinatal history
• Did the mother take any drugs during pregnancy especially in the first trimester?
• Did the mother have any infections especially in the first trimester?
• Did the mother have any history of substance abuse?
• Is there any maternal health problems?
• Did prenatal ultrasounds show any abnormality?
• Was there any abnormality in previous pregnancies?
Get a natal history in appropriate case.
• Was it a full term delivery?
• What was the type of delivery?
• What was the type of presentation at birth?
• What was the birth weight?
• Was there any delay in first cry?
• Were there any complications during delivery?
Get details of nutrition to assess the chance of nutritional deficiencies like rickets.
• Vegetarian or non-vegetarian
• Calorie intake
• Food fads
• Exposure to sunlight
• Whether diet is balanced or not
Family history
• H/o similar or other deformities
Developmental history
• When did social smile appear?
• When did the child achieve
• Neck steadiness
• Sitting
• Standing
• Crawling
• Walking
• Stair climbing and descending
• Hand to hand transfer
General Examination
Inspection
Inspect the patient in standing, sitting, walking and in the supine position. Inspect from the front,
back and both sides. Look for any asymmetry in size, shape and function.
Look at
• Head tilt and rotation
• Level of shoulders, scapula and iliac crests
• Look for spinal deformity such as scoliosis or kyphosis
• Look for lumbar lordosis suggestive of flexion deformity of hip when the patient is supine on a
hard surface
• Look for knee deformity in all three planes
• Look for ankle equinus or calcaneus deformity from the side
• Look for any hindfoot varus or valgus from the back
• Look for any forefoot or toe deformity
Palpation
Palpate the bone, soft tissues and joint. Look for change in temperature; limb with post-polio
residual contracture is cold. Look for any tenderness and note the site of tenderness. When
palpating bony and soft tissues; look for any asymmetry, thickening, swelling or defect.
Movements
Assess the active and passive movements of spine, hip, knee and the foot and ankle. Record the
range of movement. Look for restriction of range of movement, pain during joint movement,
ligamentous laxity, joint instability and any abnormal sounds during joint movement. While
moving the joint passively, watch out for muscle spasm. Movement should be assessed in all
three planes depending on the normal movement for that particular joint.
Measurements
Measurement is done to detect any limb length discrepancy, to assess degree of muscle wasting.
Limb length discrepancy may be true or functional. True LLD is due to real shortening or
lengthening. Functional LLD is due to abnormal joint positioning such as adduction contracture
of hip. Girth of the thigh is measured 15 cm above the knee joint line and girth of the calf is
measured at the bulkiest area.
In addition measure intercondylar distance between medial femoral condyles in the standing
position for genu varum. In cases of genu valgum measure the intermalleolar distance in the
standing position.
Torsional abnormalities may be in the femur, tibia or foot. Torsional abnormalities lead to either
in-toeing or out-toeing. Intoeing is more common. Commonest cause of intoeing in children
below one year is metatarsus adductus, commonest cause from 1-3 years is internal tibial torsion;
and after 3 years of age excessive femoral anteversion is the commonest cause. It is identified by
assessment of foot progression angle. Foot progression angle is the angular difference between
the direction of walking and the long axis of the foot. If the foot is externally rotated then the
angle is positive and if internally rotated then the angle is negative. Normal value for children
and adolescents is 10 degrees.
Femoral anteversion is assessed by doing the Craig’s test. It is done in the following method.
In addition the range of rotational movement of the hip is also recorded. The patient is made
prone and the pelvis is made level. Then rotate the hip internally and externally to the
maximum
point to which it is maintained by gravity alone. In patients with excessive femoral anteversion,
the range of internal rotation is increased and external rotation is diminished. In femoral
retroversion, the external rotation is increased and internal rotation diminished.
Tibial torsion is assessed by the thigh foot angle or angle of the transmalleolar axis.
If the foot is not normal, then measure the angle of the transmalleolar axis.
Patient position – The patient is asked lie prone on a couch with the knee flexed to 90 degrees.
Procedure – The centre of each malleoli are marked. Connect these points by a line across the
plantar surface of the sole. Draw a line perpendicular to it.
Interpretation – The angle between the thigh axis and a line perpendicular to the transmalleolar
axis is measured, which is equal to the tibial torsion.
Torsional deformity of the foot is assessed by heel bisector line. Heel bisector line divides the
heel into two equal halves in the longitudinal axis. In the normal foot it passes through the
second toe. If it passes medial to the second toe, forefoot is abducted and if it passes lateral to the
second toe, the forefoot is adducted. If it passes through the third metatarsal, adduction deformity
is mild, through fourth metatarsal is considered moderate and through fifth metatarsal is
considered to be severe metatarsus adductus.
In newborn feet, V- finger test is done to assess the forefoot adduction. The heel of the child is
placed in the second interdigital cleft of the examiner. Normally the lateral border of foot is
straight and will be in contact with the examiners finger. If the lateral border of the foot beyond
the fifth metatarsal base is not in contact with the examiner’s finger due to medial deviation, then
there is metatarsus adductus deformity.
Ask the patient to stand with his feet and knee touching each other while the patella is facing
forwards. When inspected from the front, there will be a gap between the knees in patients with
genu varum. In patients with genu valgum, the ankles will be kept apart. Inspect from the side,
specifically looking for equinus or calcaneus deformity of ankle, flexion deformity or
hyperextension deformity of knee.
Ask the patient to lie supine on a hard couch and look for any lumbar lordosis suggestive of
fixed flexion contracture of hip. If present do the Thomas test to assess the severity of flexion
deformity.
Intercondylar distance is measured to assess the severity of genu varum deformity. Ask the
patient to stand with his medial malleoli touching each other and then measure the distance
between the medial femoral condyles. Intermalleolar distance is measured in patients with genu
valgum deformity. Ask the patient to stand with his medial femoral condyles touching each other
and the foot should be in neutral rotation, measure the distance between the medial malleoli.
Both these measurements have the disadvantage of being influenced by the size of the patient. In
this situation, measurement of the tibiofemoral angle using a goniometer is essential. This is
measured in the standing position. Lateral thigh leg angle is measured by keeping the arms of the
goniometer on the lateral surface of thigh and leg and the hinge of the goniometer at the level of
knee. Other method is by keeping the arms of goniometer on the anterior surface of the thigh and
leg and the hinge of goniometer over the centre of patella.
In patients with genu valgum one should do the Ober’s test to rule out ITB contracture and assess
the patient for patellofemoral instability. Measure the standing height, sitting height and arm
span of the patient.
Limb length discrepancy(LLD) may be true or functional. True limb length discrepancy is due to
shortening or lengthening of bone or joint dislocation. Functional LLD is due to abnormal joint
positioning such as pelvic obliquity due to adduction contracture or flexion deformity of knee.
LLD may be due to abnormal pelvic height, femoral length, tibial length or foot height. LLD
may lead to abnormal gait, cosmetic problem, osteoarthritis due to abnormal weight transmission
or low backache. LLD up to 2 cm at skeletal maturity is considered physiological as only about
25-30% of normal population have equal limb length. Left lower limb is longer than the right in
a ratio of 3.5:1.
When the patient is standing; assess whether the shoulder, iliac crest and the popliteal and the
gluteal creases are at the same level. Look for compensatory scoliosis, which will disappear if
the patient is made to sit. LLD may be masked by flexion of opposite knee and plantar flexion of
ankle.
LLD is best measured using blocks of known height under the foot of the affected side; till the
pelvis is level and the compensatory lordosis disappears. Lower limb length measurement
includes measurement of the whole lower limb and measurement of length of individual limb
segments. Whole length measurement is done either by placing blocks of known thickness under
the shorter limb till the pelvis is level or by measuring using a measuring tape.
With measuring tape; measure both the true length and apparent length. Apparent length is
measured from the xiphisternum or umbilicus to the inferior tip of the medial malleolus when the
limbs are kept parallel. To measure the true length, both the limbs should be kept in an identical
position. Hence if there is a fixed adduction deformity of hip; first make the pelvis level by
adducting the affected hip till both the anterior superior iliac spines (ASIS) are at the same level.
Measure the true length if the affected limb from the inferior edge of ASIS to the inferior edge of
medial malleolus. Now keep the opposite hip also in an identical degree of adduction and then
measure the other side as well.
The lower limb has 4 segments; supratrochanteric (pelvic), infratrochanteric (femur), tibial and
foot segments. Infratrochanteric segment is measured from the tip of greater trochanter to the
lateral joint line of knee. Tibial segment is measured from the medial joint line of knee to the tip
of medial malleolus.
Patient is supine on the table. Flex both the hip and knees and place both the feet together. Note
the level of knee. In case of LLD the levels will be different. Now look from the side. If the
shortening is in the femoral segment; the level of knee will be proximal to the other knee and if
shortening is in the tibial segment, knee will be distal to other knee.
Cover-up test
Done between the ages of 1-3 years. The child is either standing or lying supine. The part of tibia
distal to the proximal third is covered by a hand and observe the angular relationship between the
thigh and proximal tibia. If in neutral or valgus, no need to observe for tibia vara. If in varus then
observe to rule out tibia vara.
Suggested reading
1. Pauwels F. Biomechanics of the locomotor apparatus. New York: Springer Verlag, 1980.
2. Chao EYS, Neluheni EVD, Hsu RWW, Paley D. Biomechanics of malalignment. Orth
Clin N.A. 25: 379-386, 1994.
3. Moreland JR, Bassett LW, Hanker GJ. Radiographic analysis of the axial alignment of the
lower extremity. J. Bone Joint Surg, 69A: 745-749, 1987.
4. Andriacchi TP. Dynamics of knee malalignment. Orth Clin N.A., 25: 395 406, 1984.
5. Paley D, Tetsworth K. Malalignment and realignment of the lower extremity. Orth Clin N.
A., 25:355-367, 1994.
6. Paley D,Herzenberg JE,Tetsworth K et al. Deformity planning for frontal and sagittal
plane corrective osteotomies. Orthop Clin North Am. 1994;25:425-465
7. Salenius P, Vankka E. The development of the tibiofemoral angle in children. J Bone Joint
Surg Am 1975;57:259-61
8. Bruce RW Jr. Torsional and angular deformities. Pediatric Clinics of North America
1996:43:867-81.
9. Staheli LT, Corbett M, Wyss G, King H. Lower extremity rotational problems in children.
Normal values to guide management. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985;67:39-47
History:
Trauma
Renal diseases (failure to thrive, acidotic breathing)
Family history
Infection
GIT diseases - oily stools, failure to thrive, diffuse abdominal pains)
Muscle weakness: esp proximal muscle weakness:
Tumors
Nutritional disease
General Examination: To r/o Dysplasias
Examination:
Intermalleolar /Intercondylar Distance: on standing and sitting
Thigh leg angle
Anteversion of hip
Thigh –foot angle
Transmalleolar axis
Knee flexion to find the component of the varum / valgum
Q angle:
ITB contracture;
Fibular Hemimelia/ Tibial Hememelia:
Metatarsus varus:
Calcaneo Valgus,
Equinus:
Examination of foot and ankle:
Examination of hip: to r/o coxa vara.
Intermalleolar dist: Normal : 2.5 cm.
Mild : 2.5 – 5 cm.
Moderate : 5 –10 cm.
Severe : >10 cm.
Q13. What are the precautions you have to take while taking X ray?
A. Both patellae should face forward.
B. If there is any LLD that has to be corrected by keeping wooden block under the short
limb so that both ASIS should be at the same level. Hip, knee and ankle should be
visible in a single film.
Q15. What is the difference between full length x ray and scanogram?
A. In scanogram standard size of film is used with 3 separate exposures of the hip, knee &
ankle in recumbent position. Beam is centre on joint with a radio-opaque ruler.
Full length x ray is taken in weight bearing, so that you will get real deformity and you
can draw the mechanical axis and further planning.
Q19. What is the normal change of the angle during development of the limb?
A. 6-12 months - moderate genu varum
18 – 24 months – leg straight
4 years – pjysiological genu valgus
6 years – leg straight
Q30. What are the indications for deformity correction in a symptomatic patient?
A. Pain & inflammation in joints, restriction of motion, gait dysfunction or alteration and
aesthetic & psychosocial
Q31. What are the indications for deformity correction in a non symptomatic patient?
A. Femoral mechanical valgus > 5 deg, Tibial mechanical varus > 5 deg, MAD > 15 deg,
XRay evidence of degenerative joint disease and clinical signs (trendelenburg, lateral thrust)
Q32. What are the treatment methods available for these deformities?
A. Conservative method is bracing. Surgeries includes epiphysiodesis, 8 plate application,
osteotomy and fixation by internal plates or by external by iliizarov
History
Rule out symptoms s/o peroneal tenosynovitis / Peroneal subluxation/
Peroneal impingement. (in malunited calcaneal #)
r/o septic arthritis and sequelae of tuberculosis.
Adult with flat foot - enquire about a similar family history and r/o presence of subtalar arthritis.
Q&A
Q13. What are the manipulative correction techniques you know of?
A. Kite and Lovell’s
Ponseti’s
Q16. What are the indications for soft tissue release in clubfoot?
A. Neglected clubfoot
Resistant clubfoot
Relapse /Residual deformities
The exact pathogenesis and aetiology is unknown. There are numerous theories which include:
Primary germ plasm defect
Mechanical moulding theory
Neurogenic theory: histochemical abnormalities secondary to denervation changes in various
muscle groups of the foot
Myogenic theory: primary muscle defect. Predominance in type I muscle fibres, fibre type IIB
deficiency and abnormal fibre grouping
Arrest of normal development of the growing limb bud
Congenital constriction annular bands
Retracting fibrosis: increased fibrous tissue and localised soft tissue contractures found in the
muscles and ligaments of the clubfoot
Familial incidence but precise genetics are unknown (25% of patients with CTEV have a
positive family history)
Viral causes
Q27. How would you clinically assess a patient with club foot?
Examine the whole child to exclude associated abnormalities like myelomeningocele, intra-
spinal tumour, diastematomyelia, polio, CP. Also look for any associated developmental
syndromes like arthrogryposis, diastrophic dysplasia. Look for other moulding conditions.
Examine the spine to exclude neurological causes. Pulses: usually present but vascular dysgenesis is
possible. Dorsalis pedis artery may be absent. Look for creases: medial, plantar, posterior. The affected
limb may be shortened, calf muscle is atrophic, and foot is short compared to opposite side
Q28. What are the muscles contractures that lead to the characteristic deformities in
CTEV?
Dorsiflexion lateral view or Turco's view shows talocalcaneal angle of < 35° and flat talar head
(normal is talocalcaneal angles of > 35°)
AP xray shows talocalcaneal angle or Kite's angle of < 20° (normal is 20-40°) and talus-first
metatarsal angle will be negative (normal is 0-20°)
Dimeglio classified club foot in to 4 types - Stiff: Irreducible, Severe: Slightly reducible, Mild:
Partially reducible and Postural: Totally reducible
History
Duration
How it was first noticed
What exactly is the present problem?
The swelling itself
Cosmetic
Pain
Compression of nearby structures
Has the swelling increased in size? If so
Was it gradual?
Or was it sudden?
Has it changed shape?
Or has it remained of the same size
Pain
Did pain occur before the swelling or after?
What is the character of the pain?
Presence of fever and other constitutional symptoms
Has there been any impairment of function distal to the swelling
How has the swelling limited his/her daily activity?
Similar swellings elsewhere
Loss of weight/ loss of appetite
Family history of similar swellings or malignancy
General examination
Features of malignancy
Cachexia
Pallor/ jaundice/ LNE/HSM
Local examination
Other than routine Site/size/Shape/Surface/Surrounding area/Consistency/Pulsation/Plane of the
swelling/Engorged veins/ …. One must look for
Attitude of the limb
Compression of the distal structures.
Continuity with that of the parent bone
What type of bone and which part of bone eg. Upper metaphyseal region of the tibia
Presence of other swellings in the same bone as well as in the other bones
Change in consistency/ prominence on flexing or extending a joint.
Restriction of movements of the nearby joints. If present, mention if its due to mechanical block
or pain and spasm
Examine regional lymph nodes and distal neurovascular deficits
Examine for pressure effects
35. MUSCULOSKELETAL NEOPLASMS
Q&A
Q1. Why do you say it is a neoplasm?
A. It is a swelling that is likely to be due to abnormal proliferation of cells.
Q3. What is the plane of swelling? How will you identify it?
A. Fixed to bone if intraosseous or attached to bone. Not affected by muscle contraction
Intramuscular swellings are mobile when muscle is relaxed and fixed when muscle is
contracted
Mobile deep lesions not affected by muscle contraction are deep to deep fascia and
extramuscular
Superficial mobile swellings with pinchable skin are superficial to deep fascia but deep to
skin
Intradermal swellings are attached to skin
Q10. What all tests will you send the specimen for?
A. All specimens should be sent for both culture and histopathologic study.
Q24. What are the options available for filling the skeletal defect after limb salvage?
A. Resection arthrodesis
Bone graft
Massive allograft
Rotationplasty
Megaprosthesis
Distraction osteogenesis
Q25. What are the various surgical margins that can be achieved?
A. Intralesional- Resection within the capsule
Marginal excision- Just outside the capsule/psuedocapsule
Wide excision- Through the normal tissue within the compartment of origin
Radical excision- Excision includes the entire compartment of tumour origin
Q26. What is the difference between wide amputation and radical amputation?
A. Wide amputation- Done through the compartment of origin
Radical amputation- Compartment of tumour origin excised completely
Q27. How can you increase the margin of clearance in intra-lesional curettage?
A. Chemical cauterization using phenol or bone cement
Cryo-cauterization using liquid nitrogen
36. OSTEOMYELITIS
Q&A
Anatomical Type
I Medullary Endosteal disease
II Superficial Cortical surface infected because of coverage defect
III Localized Cortical sequestrum that can be excised without compromising stability
IV Diffuse Features of I, II, and III plus mechanical instability before or after
debridement
Physiological Class
A host Normal Immunocompetent with good local vascularity
B host Compromise Local (L) or systemic (S) factors that compromise immunity or healing
d
C host Prohibitive Minimal disability, prohibitive morbidity anticipated, or poor prognosis
for cure
Cierny and Mader Staging System for Chronic Osteomyelitis
History
H/o any previous trauma
What was the mechanism of trauma
Position of knee at time of trauma
After trauma, was the patient able to continue playing
post trauma - weight bearing possible or not, what treatment taken, how long
immobilised
pain – aggravated by sqautting, stairs, running, sudden twisting episodes
giving way – aggravating factors
recurrent swelling of knee – recurrent synovitis
paresthesia, loss of sensation foot, distal weakness
subluxating patellae
When did the effusion occur after the trauma (if immediate .. think of # intraarticular if delayed,
think of meniscal injury)
What was the treatment used?
Any h/o Clicks, thuds, giving away?
Any h/o locking / unlocking
Difficulty in climbing stairs, squatting
Any history of recurrent fever
How far it has affected his present job.
Examination
Gait
Inspection
Attitude and deformity eg. locked knee, triple deformity
Position of the patella
Any bruises, scars or sinuses
Wasting of the muscles
Any obliteration of the parapatellar fossae or any other swellings elsewhere
Never forget the POPLITEAL FOSSA
Palpation
Local rise of temperature
Anterior, medial and lateral joint line tenderness
Tests for effusion
Severe effusion: Fluid thrill, cross fluctuation
Moderate effusion: Patellar tap test
Mild effusion: Squeeze test or the wipe test
Look for synovial hypertrophy ( at the superomedial region of the knee)
Popliteal artery pulsations
Change in the prominence of the swelling on movements of the knee
Palpation of the bones for any irregularities/ tenderness
Movements
Flexion/Extension of the knee
Tracking of the patella
Measurements
Limb length
Q angle
Intermalleolar distance
Inter condylar distance
Lateral thigh leg angle
Circumferential measurements
Special test
Anterior and posterior drawer test
Lachmans test
Pivot shift test
Mcmurray test
Sag sign
Varus and valgus stress test
Wilsons test for osteochondritis dissecans
Dial test for PLC
Patellar tilt
Patellar apprehension test
Patellar glide test
CASE DISCUSSION
A 32 year old male patient presents with h/o injury to right knee sustained while playing football
two years back. Now c/o of recurrent episodes of pain and instability of right knee. There is no
history of locking.
Q&A
Q6. What are the common DDs when you find recurvatum in a posttraumatic knee?
A. Injury to PCL/PLC/Posterior capsule injury
Malunited fractures of L/3rd femur or U/3rd tibia.
Q8. What are the structures in the lateral three layers of the knee joint?
A. I Superficial ( by Seebacher et al)
Iliotibial tract
Biceps femoris
Lateral deep fascia
II Middle
Quadriceps retinaculum
Patellofemoral ligaments
III Deep
Lateral collateral ligament
Popliteofibular ligament
Popliteus tendon
Fabellofibular ligament
Arcuate ligament
Capsule
Q9. What are the structures in the medial three layers of the knee joint?
A. I Superficial layer (Warren & Marshall et al)
Deep fascia of thigh
Medial patellar retinaculum
In middle splits to enclose sartorius
II Middle layer
Superficial medial collateral ligament
Medial patellofemoral ligament
III Deep layer
Joint capsule
Thickened medially by deep medial collateral ligament
Posterior thickening called posterior oblique ligament
## Pes Anserinus lies between superficial and middle layer
Q14. What is the significance of positive valgus test in 30 deg and 0 deg?
A. Positive valgus in 30 deg only: medial strs injured – MCL
Positive valgus in 30 & 0 deg: medial strs injured along with cruciates (ACL and / or
PCL) and posteromedial capsule
Q19. What are the requisites for a positive pivot shift test?
A. A non functioning ACL
An intact medial complex
An intact iliotibial tract
Q22. Describe the various rotary instabilities and tests used to diagnose it?
A. Anteromedial rotary instability(AMRI) :
injury to medial strs like MCL, posterior oblique ligament (POL) & ACL.
Anterior drawer test
Slocum in ER
Valgus stress in 30deg
Anterolateral rotary instability(ALRI):
injury to ACL and lateral capsular ligament
Slocum in internal rotation
Pivot shift test of Macintosh
Jerk test of Hughston
Flexion rotation drawer test
Posterolateral rotary instability(PLRI):
Injury includes posterolateral structures like popiteus tendon, arcuate ligament
complex,lateral capsular ligament, posterolateral capsule with or without PCL.
External rotation recurvatum test
Reverse pivot shift test
Posterolateral drawer test
Tibial external rotation test or Dial test
Posteromedial rotary instability(PLRI):
Injury to MCL, posteromedial capsule, posterior oblique ligament, semimembranosus
insertion with or without PCL
Q24. Which meniscus commonly injured in acute ACL injury and chronic ACL injury?
A. Acute ACL – lateral meniscus
Chronic ACL – medial meniscus
Q25. What are the signs and tests for meniscal injury?
A. Signs:
Joint line tenderness (high sensitivity, low specificity)
Locked knee (short of terminal extension)
Recurrent effusions ( look for synovial thickening)
positive McMurray’s ( high specificity, low sensitivity)
Bounce-home test ( painful terminal extension)
Thessaly test
Quadriceps wasting
Q36. What are the Ottawa knee rules (i.e; when to order
Xrays after acute knee trauma)?
A. Unable to walk
tenderness on patella
Age > 55 or < 18
tenderness on fibular head
Unable to flex 90 deg
Q41. What are the anatomical components of posterolateral corner of the knee joint?
A. 1. tibia, fibula, lateral femur (bony)
2. iliotibial band (IT band)
3. biceps femoris tendon
4. fibular (lateral) collateral ligament (FCL)
5. popliteus tendon
6. popliteofibular ligament
7. Arcuate ligament
8. lateral gastrocnemius tendon
9. fabellofibular ligament
10. Posterolateral capsule
4/5/6 are the most important structures
Q45. Describe the anatomy of posterior oblique ligament and oblique posterior ligament?
A. Posterior oblique ligament (POL): thickening of the medial capsular ligament attached
proximally to adductor tubercle of femur and distally to tibia & posterior aspect of the capsule;
anatomically this is the third (deep) layer of the medial compartment, provides resistance to
valgus loads
Oblique posterior ligament : a slip from the insertion of the semimembranosus on
posteromedial aspect of tibia that runs obliquely & laterally upward crossing popliteal fossa
toward the lateral femoral condyle.
Anatomically in the middle layer . Tightens the posteromedial capsule of knee
History
Always r/o the presence of R.S.D.
Always determine the dominance of the hand
Examination
Inspection
Attitude and deformity
Swelling at the wrist joint
Trophic changes
Wasting
Orientation of the fingers towards the scaphoid.
Palpation
Local rise of temperature
Joint line tenderness ( at individual joints as well as anatomical snuff box)
Always palpate for thickness of wrist or any step sign
Volkmanns sign
Movements
Look for wrist Palmar flexion and extension/ radial and ulnar deviation/ pronation and
supination
Examine for stiffness of the fingers, elbow and the shoulders
Malunited Colles # : dorsiflexion increased with alteration of styloid process
Malunited Smith# : Volar flexion increased with alteration of styloid process
Malunited Barton# : Movement will be restricted with normal styloid relation
CIADER : Movement will be absent or grossly restricted with altered styloid
Madelung’s deformity: Restriction of dorsiflexion, supination and radial deviation
Examination of the hand functions
Grip
Grasp
Pinch
Special tests
Piano Key sign: DRUJ instability
Allens test for assessing vascularity
Tests for ulnar impingement:
Scapholunate instability: Scapholunate ballotment
Watson’s shift test
Lunotriquetral instability: Reagen test
Lunotriquetral ballotment
Klienman shear test
Tests for nerves and vascularity
Q3. What are the fracture characteristics contributing to the development of malunion
A. severe communition
severe osteoporosis
disruption of the distal radioulnar ligaments
Q4. What are the radiographic criteria for acceptable healing of distal radial#
Radiographic
Criterion Acceptable Measurement
Radioulnar length Radial shortening of <5 mm at distal radioulnar joint compared with
contralateral wrist
Radial inclination Inclination on posteroanterior film ≥15 degrees
Radial tilt Sagittal tilt on lateral projection between 15-degree dorsal tilt and 20-
degree volar tilt
Articular incongruity Incongruity of intraarticular fracture ≤2 mm at radiocarpal joint
Q8. Which abnormality of radius in malunion mainly causes loss of grip stength of
hand?
A. Shortening of radius
Q9. What are the clinical features expected in a case of malunited lower end radius?
A. Pain, stiffness, weakness, cosmetic deformity
impaired ulnar deviation and increased radial deviation
decreased pronation and supination –malunited smith fracture and incongruity at the
distal radioulnar joint
impaired grip strength
s/o median nerve compression ---from a dorsally tilted malunion that increased pressure
within the carpal tunnel
Q12. What are the Primary indications for resection of the distal ulna ?
A. Malunion in older patients with significant ulnar variance, arthritis of the distal RUJ or as
a salvage procedure after failed reconstruction of the distal RU jt.
Q13. What are the Indication for salvage procedures (wrist fusion)?
A. symptomatic fractures with marked intra articular comminution or severe radiocarpal or
intercarpal degenerative changes for which conservative Rx has failed.
Q14. What is the procedure for extra articular malunion with dorsal angulation
A. Osteotomy – dorsal open wedge metaphyseal osteotomy
With grafting of the radius
With internal fixation with plate and screw
Q15. What are the contraindication for radial osteotomy?
A. 1) Active reflex sympathetic dystrophy
2) Acceptable function despite deformity
3) Poor soft-tissue envelope
4) Severe osteopenia
5) Advanced radiocarpal or intercarpal arthritis
Q16. What is the procedure for extra articular malunion with volar angulation
A. Volar opening wedge osteotomy for distal radius bone grafting and Plating
Q4. What are the common causes of ulnar nerve palsy in india?
A. Hansens disease, diabetes mellitus, rheumatoid arthritis.
Q8. How will you differentiate between high and low ulnar nerve palsy?
A Ulnar paradox will be present in high ulnar nerve palsy and FCU will be weak in high
ulnar nerve palsy.
Q16. How will you differentiate between high and low radial nerve palsy?
A. In high radial nerve palsy brachioradialis will be affected.
Q18. What is the autonomous zone of radial median and ulnar nerve?
A. Radial-dorsum of first interdigital web.
Ulnar-palmar aspect of distal phalynx.
Median-palmar and dorsal aspect of index fingers distal phalynx,
Q22. How will you differentate between finger drop of polio and leprosy?
A. Sensory involvement in leprosy.
Equinus will be more prominent in polio.
Trophic changes will be present in leprosy.
In
first-degree injury, conduction along the axon is physiologically interrupted at the site of injury,
but the axon is not disrupted. No wallerian degeneration occurs, and recovery is spontaneous and
usually complete within a few days or weeks
In second-degree injury, disruption of the axon is evident, with wallerian degeneration distal to
the point of injury and degeneration proximal for one or more nodal segments. The integrity of
the endoneurial tube (schwann cell basal lamina) is maintained,
In third-degree injury, the axons and endoneurial tubes are disrupted, but the perineurium is
reserved. The result is disorganization resulting from disruption of the endoneurial tubes
regeneration
In fourth-degree injury, the axon and endoneurium are disrupted, but some of the epineurium
and possibly some of the perineurium are preserved, so complete severance of the entire trunk
does not occur.
In fifth-degree injury, the nerve is completely transected, resulting in a variable distance between
the neural stumps. These injuries occur only in open wounds and usually are identified at the
time of early surgical exploration.
Sixth-degree (mackinnon) or mixed injuries occur in which a nerve trunk is partially severed, and
the remaining part of the trunk sustains fourth-degree, third-degree, second-degree, or rarely
even first-degree injury.
Q34. How will you differentiate between preganglion and postganglion lesions?
A. Post ganglionic lesions will not give a positive flare with histamine that is axon reflex is
absent.
Long tracts,dorsal scapular nerve and long thoracic nerve of bell are involved in
preganglionic lesions.
43…Footdrop
Clinical Approach
Bilateral
LMN
Peripheral neuropathy
UMN
Cord lesion
Unilateral
Once dorsiflexion impaired
Check eversion (dorsiflexion + eversion = Common peroneal nerve)
Check inversion and plantarflexion (= posterior tibial nerve)
If foot drop and inversion + eversion is lost with normal plantarflexion = L5 nerve root
If all gone = posterior tibial + common peroneal, sciatic nerve or plexus/roots
Knee flexion intact
Go to sensory
Peripheral neuropathy
Common peroneal nerve palsy (sensory loss over dorsum of the foot)
Determine if common peroneal nerve or
Deep branch only or
The superficial branch only
If knee flexion weak, test hip abduction and internal rotation and intact
Go to sensory
Sciatic nerve
If hip abduction and internal rotation is weak
Go to sensory
Nil = anterior horn cell
L4 and L5 dermatome = plexus or root
Sciatic nerve (L4 L5 S1 S2 S3)
Weakness of the knee flexion also
Knee jerk is intact but ankle jerk is affected and plantar response absent (for common
peroneal nerve, all reflexes intact)
L5 nerve root
Weakness of hip abduction and internal rotation as well as loss of foot inversion
Anatomy
Sciatic nerve (L4, L5, S1, S2, S3) divides at the popliteal fossa into the Tibial (L4, L5, S1, S2, S3
) and Common Peroneal nerves (L4, L5, S1 & S2)
The posterior tibial nerves supplies plantar flexors and invertors of the foot
The common peroneal nerves winds round the neck of the fibula; is covered by s/c tissue
and skin only; and prone to extrinsic compression
It then divides into the
Superficial branch: foot everters and sensation to lateral calves and dorsum of the foot
Deep branch : toe dorsiflexors and dorsiflexion of the ankle and sensation to the first
interdigital web space
Therefore wasting of the peroneous and anterior tibialis muscles; weakness of
dorsiflexion of the foot and eversion; foot drop and high steppage gait and loss of
sensory over the lateral aspect of the calf and dorsum of the foot
Causes
Trauma - # lateral condyle of tibia, fibular neck fracture
Surgical – post THR, TKR (patients with spinal canal stenosis are more prone ~ “Double
Crush hypothesis”; proximal insult diminishes axoplasmic flow)
Compression at the neck of the fibula (habitual leg crossing, cast, brace)
Infection – Leprosy (cooler parts of the body, attacks schwann cells), poliomyelitis
(muscles supplied by shorter column are more subjected to permanent paralysis; Tibialis
anterior is commonly affected in polio)
Inflammatory – CIDP
Ischaemic - Vasculitis
As a part of mononeuritis multiplex (Endocrine, Autoimmune, infection, infiltrative and
cancer)
Exogenous toxins (lead, mercury, arsenic)
At the end of history taking, the examiner should be able to identify whether foot drop is due
to trauma, post surgical, infective or inflammatory origin.
EXAM CASES
HIP CASES
Non union neck of femur
Malunited trochanteric fracture
Neglected dislocation hip (traumatic, paralytic )
Unstable hip
Post traumatic protrusion acetabulum ( central fracture dislocation hip)
Post traumatic Myositis ossificans
Perthes disease
SCFE
Avascular necrosis femoral head
DDH /CDH
Chondrolysis hip
Congenital coxa vara
Sequelae septic arthritis hip / infectious sequelae
TB hip
Synovitis hip
Osteoarthritis hip ( secondary common, primary rare)
Rheumatiod arthritis / juvenile RA
Ankylosis spondylitis
Fibrous ankylosis
Bony ankylosis
Multiple epiphyseal dysplasia
Spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia
Proximal focal femur deficiency
Benign and malignant tumours ( osteochondroma, aneurysmal bone cyst, secondaries,
osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma…)
SPINE CASES:
TB spine/ infection with neurological deficit
IVDP with neurological deficit (foot drop, bowel bladder deficit, abductor weakness)
Scoliosis (congenital, idiopathic), kyphoscoliosis
SHOULDER CASES:
Neglected dislocation shoulder
Recurrent / habitual dislocation shoulder
TB shoulder / post infectious sequelae
Brachial plexus palsy
Deltoid contracture
Nonunion humerus with nerve palsy
Postpolio residual palsy (PPRP)
Tumours (benign- bone cysts/ osteochondroma/ GCT….. malignant – osteosarcoma/
chondrosarcoma/ secondaries/ GCT)
Syringomyelia
ELBOW CASES:
Cubitus varus /valgus
Malunited supracondylar fracture / intercondylar fracture
Post traumatic stiff elbow
Malunited Monteggia
Nonunion lateral condyle
Neglected dislocation elbow
Unreduced radial head
Myositis ossificans
Radioulnar synostosis
TB elbow / post infectious sequelae
Sequelae side sweep injury
Tardy ulnar palsy
Volkman ischemic contracture
Tumours
GENERAL TOPICS
Nerve injuries ( radial, median, ulnar, sciatic, common peroneal nerve, brachial plexus, leprosy)
Pseudoarthrosis
ITB contracture
Chronic osteomyelitis
Epiphyseal / Metaphyseal dysplasias
Dwarfism
Cerebral palsy
Polio
Osteogenensis imperfecta
Sickle cell disease
ANTIBIOTIC AGENTS
1. Silver sulphadiazine
2. Povidone-iodine ointment( betadine)
3. Nitrofurazone ointment( furacin)
4. Framycin sulphate cream ( soframycin)
5. Neomycin, polymyxin and bacitracin combination ( neosporin)
6. Gentamycin
DESLOUGING AGENTS
1. Eusol
2. Salutyl ointment:
3 Alum
4. Magnesium sulfate
5. Debrisan granules
7. 1% zinc sulfate solution
GRANULATING AGENTS
1. Oxeferrin
2. Placentrex
HYGROSCOPIC AGENTS
To reduce surrounding edema
( eg: Glycerine, Magsulf)
CLEANSING AGENTS
Hydrogen peroxide
POVIDONE-IODINE ( BETADINE)
Products available: POVIDONE-IODINE ( 5% & 10 %), Surgical scrub ( 7.5% w/v), ointment
Properties & Effects:
-Iodine useful germicide- effective against bacteria, viruses, fungi, protozoa and yeast.
- Disadv: insolubility, instability, irritant & staining properties.
- these undesirable qualities eliminated by combining with polyvinyl pyrrolidone (
povidone)- organic polymer which is water-soluble
- combination leads to complex formation- Polyvinyl Pyrrolidone Iodine
( Povidone- Iodine) having bactericidal activity of iodine without its toxic effects
SAVLON
Composition:
Chlorhexidine Gluconate 7.5 % V/V
Cetrimide 16%
Isopropyl alcohol 6.8 % v/v
Colour: Tartrazine ( yellow)
Properties and effects: Germicide & Detergent
Dilution: 1: 30 aqueous solution- 35 ml savlon in 1 ltr. of water- used for orthopaedic purposes
Uses: Cleaning and disinfection of dirty wounds where extra detergents are required.
HYDROGEN PEROXIDE
COMPOSITION: 20 VOL. H2O2 ( one vol. 20-vol. h2o2 releases 20 vol. of nascent oxygen)
EFFECTS: Not an antiseptic but a cleansing agent
MECHANISMS AND USES:
1. Destroys Anaerobic Organisms- Thus used for wounds infected or contaminated
with anaerobes.
2. Produces frothing and thus brings out debris from depth of wound.
3. Produces heat on tissue contact and thus prevents capillary oozing- hence used as
haemostatic agents sometimes eg: after I & D
4. Used in removing blood stains from clothings.
COMPOSITION:
1.25 gm Boric Acid
1.25 gm Bleaching Powder (Chlorinated Lime)
Sterile water upto 100ml
# EUSOL should be prepared & used fresh everyday.
MECHANISM: release of nascent chlorine
Uses:
1. To separate slough from infected wounds, bed-sores and ulcers and burns.
2. Acidic in pH and thus useful for drtessing of wounds infected with Pseudomonas
SPIRIT
COMPOSITION: Alcohol. ( Optimum Conc. Of 70 % alcohol highly effective)
USES:
1. Removal of Iodine in preparation of skin in operatiopn
2. Cleaning the stitched wound.
3. Cleaning the surrounding skin of ulcer or open wounds
4. Used along with other disinfectants like savlon and betadine for painting parts
before surgery.
DRESSING BAG
Blue in colour
Contents
i.Plain forceps
ii. Cotton swabs
iii.Gauze pieces
iv. Pad
v. Bandage
vi. Artery forceps
Sterilization- autoclaving
1. KRUKENBERG’S operation
2. Congenital absence of thumb
3. Congenital coxa vara
4. Proximal femoral focal deficiency
5. Pathological anatomy in CDH at birth, 5yrs, methods of assessing these
abnormalities.
6. Cong club foot pathological anatomy at 7 days, 4yrs, 14yrs .How would you
manage?
7. Sprengels shoulder.
8. Congenital Pseudo arthrosis oftibia.
9. Neglected CTEV
10.Radial Hemimelia
11.Osteogenesis imperfect-clinical features, Inv, Rx
12.Components of deformity in CTEV-discuss Mx of this condition up to the
age of 7 yrs. Diagnostic features of CDH at birth and during first year of life.
Role of Saltesis osteotomy.
13.Rigid club foot.
14.Pes cavus.
15.Congenital vertical talus.
16.Congenital pseudo arthrosis of tibia- Newer methods of Mx
17.Klippal Feil ssyndrome.
18.Madelungs deformity.
19.Fibular hemi Melia.
20.Pes Planus.
BASICS, METABOLISM, GENERAL ORTHO
1. Renal rickets.
2. Osteomalacia.
3. Prophylactic antibiotic in orthopedic surgery.
4. Bacteraemia, Septicaemia, Pyemia, Toxicemia with illustration.
5. Osteopetrosis.
6. Electrical properties of bone.
7. SCURVY.
8. Crystal Synovitis.
9. Disturbances of uric acid metabolism.
10.NSAIDS in RA Disorder.
11.Myositis Ossificans Traumatica.
12.Hyper parathyroidism.
13.BRODIES ABSCESS.
14.MRI in Orthopaedics.
15.Autosomal dominant inheritance -10 common disorders.
16.Role of parathormore in mineral metabolism.
17.Changes that occur in the Morphology of articular cartilage in degenerative
joint diseases.
18.Role of PYRAZINAMIDE in Orthopaedic practice.
19.Role of bone scan in orthopaedic practice.
20.What is bone mass- How it is affected in senile osteoporosis and in
osteomalacia.
21.Traumatic myositis ossifications pathogenesis.
TUMORS
28.CHORDOMA
1. Idiopathic scoliosis.
2. Cervical spondylosis.
3. Pressure sores.
4. Describe mechanism of injury to the dorsal spine junction, current concepts
in the stabilization of spinal injuries- discuss.
5. AUTOMATIC urinary bladder.
6. Thoracic outlet syndrome.
7. Caudaequina syndrome.
8. Classification and Mx of the injuries of the ATLAS & AXIS.
9. Anatomy of atlanto axial joint. Principal of Mx of fracture of adontoid
process.
10.Types of fracture healing.
11.Reflex bladder in paraplegia.
12.C.F, pathological anatomy of spine Bifida
13.Basic care of paraplegia
14.Neurological findings- transaction of cord at D6
15.Neurogenic bladder
16.Enumerate the causes of failed lumbar Disc Surgery and Rx.
17.Describe the biomechanics of dorsolumbar spine & classification of injuries
at this region
18.Conservative Mx of cervical spondylosis
19.Fracture ATLAS
20.Innervations of urinary bladder.
21.Etio, Patho, Mx of spinal canal stenosis
22. Cord bladder
23.Psoas abscess
24.IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS Mx.
25.Halopelvic traction
26.Halotraction device
27.Lumbar canal stenosis.
28.Automatic bladder
GENERAL SURGERY
1.Pathogenesis,management o f the lower limbs in diabetes mellitus
4.symes amputation
8.madura foot
9.stove in chest
12.ARDS
17.what is thrombophlebitis and phlebothrombosis.how will you prevent and treat these conditions in
orthopaedics
19.tension pneumothorax
20.phantom limb
21.claassify acute vascular occlusion of lower limb.discuss its clinical features including management
FRACTURES
1.osteochondral fractures
3.bartons fracture
7.callotasis,bone transplant
10.locked IM nail-principles
12.distraction osteosynthesis
16.fracture scaphoid
17.bennets fracture.
19.biomechanical principles of ring fixators and their application in orthopaedic trauma care
26.describe in detail the process of healing of fracture under stable condition in a cortical bone
27.discuss carpal instability and management
29.jones fracture
30.fracture acetabulum
31.classify fracture of pelvis,discuss the mechanism of injuries of pelvis and their management
36.acromioclavicular dislocation
38.stress fracture
39.cause of non union in intra capsular fractures of NOF,how could you manage a case of subcapital
fracture NOF in 35 year old patients
40.biological fixation
41.classify fracture around ankle,describe the mode of such injuries and discuss their managemnt
1.epiphyseal injuries
3.histology of PHYSIS and mention the factors that cause derangements of its growth
6.Clinical ,investigation methods in early diagnosis of septic arthritis of the hip in infancy
1.hallux valgus
2.calcaniovalgus deformity
KNEE,PATELLA
2.chandromalacia patella
7.Discoid meniscus
8. Osgood-Schlatter Disease
9.management of triple deformity of the knee in TB
10.osteochondritis dessicans
12.genu recurvatum
13.biomechanics of malalignment of the knee joint and its role in regenerative arthropathy
14.blounts disease
HIPS
4.biomechanics of the normal hip joint and its role in total hip replacement
5. trendlenbergs gait
8.trendlenbergs test
16.discuss failure factos in implant surgery.write in short the management of failed austin moore
athroplasty
3.FROZEN shoulder
6.what is BANKARTS lesion?describe different steps of bankarts operation for recurrent dislocation of
shoulder
10.cubitus varus
11.sprengel shoulder
13.cubitus valgus
HAND
3.dupuytrens contracture
4.pathogenesis of rheumatois hand
12.opponens palsy
14.trigger finger
PROSTHESIS
3.SACH FOOT
5.various kind of exercises forn an adult with LBA resulting from prolapsed disc syndrome including their
rationale
9.russel traction
10.cock up splint
11.jaipoor foot
12.electrical stimulation of ms
14.cast bracing
15.microwave diathermy
17.pavliks harness
MISCELLANEOUS TOPICS
1. Cementing techniques
2. Limb salvage in Osteosarcoma
3. Biological agent in Rheumatoid arthritis
4. Total shoulder replacement
5. Double bundle ACL reconstruction
6. Local antibiotic delivery system
7. Safe surgical dislocation of hip
8. Custom mega prosthesis
9. Ceramics in orthopaedics
10. Stem cells in orthopaedics
11. Joint lubrication
12. Isotope bone scan
13. Zolendronic acid
14. Bone cement
15. Proximal femoral nail
16. Bearing surfaces in THR
17. Image intensifier in orthopaedics
18. Lasso procedure
19. Immuno assay in skeletal infections
20. Aseptic loosening of prosthesis
21. Femeroacetabular impingement
22. Bioabsorbable implants
23. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
24. Bone substitutes
25. Bone bank
26. Floor reaction orthosis
27. Guided growth
28. Biological fixation
29. Damage control orthopaedics
30. Viscosuplimentation
31. Evidence based orthopaedics
32. Cement disease
33. Biofilm
34. Total elbow replacement
35. Single event multilevel surgery in CP
36. Continuous passive motion
37. Vertebroplasty
38. Disc replacement
39. High tibial osteotomy
40. Piezoelectricity in orthopaedics
41. Ligamentotaxis
42. Somatosensory evoked potential
43. Low temperature thermoplastics
44. Hoopstress
45. Slap lesion
46. Computer navigated arthroplasty
47. Percutaneous discectomy
48. Unicompartmental knee replacement
49. Extracorporeal irradiation
50. Tissue expanders
51. Hydroxyapetite coating
52. Laser in orthopaedics
53. Glycocalyx
54. Ulnar drift
55. Endoscopic CTS release
56. ILN in humerus
57. Bone marrow edema syndrome
58. Osteitis condensans ilii
59. Discography
60. Autologous chondrocyte implantation
61. Far out syndrome
62. Laser discectomy
63. Stress shielding
64. Bone morphogenic protein
65. Articular cartilage replacement
66. Nerve conduction study
67. Ulnar drift
68. Nano technology in tumour treatment
69. Clean air system in OT
70. Text message injury
71. Artificial disc
72. Liss plate
73. Hybrid total hip arthroplasty
PATH FINDER
PREVIOUS YEARS QUESTION PAPERS OF KUHS, CALICUT AND KERALA
UNIVERSITIES FOR ORTHOPAEDICS
PREFACE
While we were doing our post graduation we had always wondered how we were
going to get through the initial step to success --theory exams. It was after a bit of scare after
seeing how much we had to study in such a short time towards the end of our pg that we got
our hands on some previous years question papers.
We noticed that there was repetitions and decided to study them well. But the one
thing we felt the lack of was a book that was in an orderly manner and with some tip from
where we could find the answers from. We are not claiming this book has all that, but it is the
closest to our dream book which we felt was missing in the pg students armamentarium.
We hope "PATH FINDER" will help you get an idea of the questions oft repeated and
the pattern of the examiners when preparing theory questions.
This book has been divided into sections for different question papers so that
revision is quite easy towards the last precious days. Some questions have tips from where it
can be read from best, although they may be present in books that may have missed us.
Various books have been followed while making those tips (refer section 10). Kindly do let us
know of corrections and suggestions so that later editions can be made better.
We are of the opinion that this book should be used only in the last few weeks of
exam preparation and that wide knowledge of Orthopedics is necessary for a better future. It
is this thought that helped both of us get the top marks in last year's KUHS exam rather than
studying only question papers for theory papers. Having said so we also agree that going
through the question papers of the last 5 years will surely fetch you enough marks to make it
comfortably through the KUHS theory exams.
This book would not have seen the light of the day had it not been for our friend
Dr. Thomas Angelo who provided us with the bulk of the question papers.
Our deepest appreciation goes to our supportive spouses and kids, who endured our struggles
with grace and humor.
We are greatly indebted to our teachers, colleagues and juniors of three great institutions who
provided us the motivation and support for coming out with such a venture- Calicut govt
medical college , Trivandrum govt medical college and Jubilee mission medical college,
Thrissur.
PAPER I PAPER II
DISCUSS THE AETIOLOGY, DIAGNOSIS AND CLASSIFY AND DISCUSS ABOUT MANAGEMENT
PAPER 3 PAPER 4
PAPER 1 PAPER 2
2. SCAPULAR FRACTURE
2. VITAMIN D RESISTANT RICKETS.
3. PCL DEFICIENT KNEE
TACHDJIAN CH 32 (METABOLIC&ENDOCRINE
DISEASES) 4. SCAPHOID NON UNION
9. MYOSITIS OSSIFICANS
MAY 2013 ( MS ) MAY 2013 ( MS )
PAPER 3 PAPER 4
PAPER 1 PAPER 2
1. DISCUSS THE HEALING OF FRACTURES. HOW 1. CLASSIFY THE LATERAL CONDYLE FRACTURES
WILL YOU MANAGE INFECTED NON UNION OF OF HUMERUS IN A CHILD.
PAPER 3 PAPER 4
9. ADHESIVE CAPSULITIS
SECTION 2
MS ORTHO
PAPER 1
2.ISOTOPE BONE SCAN (KUL 1 - 155) 2.GROWTH PLATE ANATOMY AND ITS
FUNCTION( DAV PART 1 GENERAL L/3RD )
3.OSTEOPETROSIS (TACHDJIAN, ORTHOPEDIC
DISORDERS) 3.DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN OSTEOPENIA AND
OSTEOPOROSIS
4.SERONEGATIVE SPONDYLOARTHROPATHY
(KUL 1- 886) 4.GLASGOW COMA SCALE
3.LISFRANC JOINT
SHORT ESSAYS (8X10=80 MARKS)
4.OSTEOPOROSIS
2.ISOTOPE BONE SCAN (KUL 1 - 155)
5.MID PALMAR SPACE
3.LOCKING COMPRESSION PLATE KULKARNI
PG1433 6.RADIOULNAR JOINT
1. DISCUSS VITAMIN D METABOLISM AND DISO 1. DECSRIBE WITH THE HELP OF A DIAGRAM
THE ANATOMY OF THE BRACHIAL PLEXUS.
RDERS OF PARATHYROID GLAND AND ITS
EFFECT ON SKELETON. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE THE MECHANISM OF
BRACHIAL PLEXUS INJURY.
4.ULNAR PARADOX
1. DISCUSS THE PATHOGENESIS, CLINICAL 1. DESCRIBE THE BLOOD SUPPLY TO THE HEAD
FEATURES AND MANAGEMENT OF ULNAR OF FEMUR.
DRIFT OF FINGERS.
DISCUSS THE MANAGEMENT OF A CASE OF
AVN OF THE HEAD OF FEMUR IN A 30 YR OLD
MALE ( DAV- GENERAL; M/3RD)
SHORT ESSAYS (8X10=80 MARKS)
3.CERVICAL RIB.
PAPER 1 PAPER 1
2.TFCC NEOPLASMS
DISEASES)
7.CHONDROITIN SULFATE
5.ROTATOR CUFF (CAMPBELL SPORTS
8.HIGH MEDIAN NERVE PALSY
MEDICINE-SHOULDER INJURIES)
9.SINGHS INDEX
6.BONE BANK KULKARNI 1137
7.CAMPTODACTYLY
9.PLASTIC DEFORMITY
MAY 2011 JUNE 2010
PAPER 1 PAPER 1
DESCRIBE THE DIFFERENT METHODS OF DISCUSS THE CHANGES IN THE GROWTH PLATE
TENDON SUTURING. HOW WILL YOU MANAGE IN RICKETS. ( DAV PART 1 GENERAL L/3RD )
A CASE OF FLEXOR TENDON INJURY IN ZONE 2
WHICH IS 2 DAYS OLD.
SHORT ESSAYS (8X10=80 MARKS)
SHORT ESSAYS (8X10=80 MARKS)
2.BRYANTS TRIANGLE
2.PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF COMPARTMENT
SYNDROME ( DAV PART 1 GENERAL L/3RD ) 3.SPRENGELS SHOULDER CAMPBELL
(CONGENITAL ANOMALIES OF TRUNK AND
3.FUNCTIONAL CAST BRACING STEWART-
UPPER EXTREMITY)
PG215
4.QUADRICEPS GAIT
4.STRUCTURE OF ARTICULAR CARTILAGE AND
HISTOPATHOLOGICAL CHANGES IN OA (TUREK 5.BIOCHEMICAL AND RADIOLOGICAL
CH2) DIAGNOSIS OF MULTIPLE MYELOMA
PAPER 1 PAPER 1
PAPER 1 PAPER 1
PAPER 1 PAPER 1
PAPER 1 PAPER 1
PAPER 1
MS ORTHO
PAPER 2
9.CUBITUS VARUS
MAY 2010 MAY 2008
9.TENSION PNEUMOTHORAX
OCTOBER 2006 MAY 2006
3.SPINE BOARD
8.FRACTURE OF ATLAS
9.CAST BRACE
MAY 2005 MAY 2004
1. WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY THE TERM 1.HOW WILL YOU EVALUATE AND TREAT
POLYTRAUMA PATIENT (5) PATHOLOGICAL FRACTURE OF SHAFT OF FEMUR
BRIEFLY DISCUSS THE PRIORITIES IN IN 60 YR OLD MAN
ASSESSMENT OF A POLYTRAUMA PATIENT (10)
LIST THE STEPS IN RESUSCITATION AND EARLY
MANAGEMENT OF A POLYTRAUMA PATIENT SHORT ESSAY (8X10=80 MARKS)
(20)
2.INTERCARPAL INSTABILITY
2.DISCUSS THE BIOCHEMICAL ABNORMALITIES
3.SUPRACONDYLAR NAIL
IN MULTIPLE MYELOMA (10)
DESCRIBE THE RADIOLOGICAL 4.LIGAMENTOTAXIS
MANIFESTATIONS (10)
5.ERBS PALSY
BRIEFLY DESCRIBE THE CHEMOTHERAPY OF
MULTIPLE MYELOMA (15) 6.STRESS FRACTURES KULKARNI 1218
1.WHAT ARE PILON FRACTURES. DISCUSS THE 1.DISCUSS THE CLINICAL FEATURES,
GOALS OF TREATMENT AND THE VARIOUS PATHOLOGICAL ANATOMY AND MANAGEMENT
TREATMENT OPTIONS IN AN ACUTE PILON OF RECURRENT DISLOCATION OF THE
FRACTURE OF THE TIBIA IN A 20 YR OLD ADULT. SHOULDER
PAPER 2 PAPER 2
9. JEFFERSON FRACTURE
9. LOW TEMP THERMOPLASTICS STEWART PG
201
MAY 2011 NOVEMBER 2010
PAPER 2 PAPER 2
PAPER 2 PAPER 2
8. SCHANZ OSTEOTOMY
PAPER 2 PAPER 2
8. LCP
PAPER 2 PAPER 2
PAPER 2 PAPER 2
8. DYNAMISATION
9. CLASSIFICATION OF SUBTROCHANTERIC
FRACTURES
JUNE 2004
PAPER 2
2. INTERCARPAL INSTABILITY
3. SUPRACONDYLAR NAIL
4. LIGAMENTOTAXIS
5. ERBS PARALYSIS
9. FLOATING HIP
SECTION 4
MS ORTHO
PAPER 3
JANUARY 2008
9.SCHMORLS NODES
MAY 2007 OCTOBER 2006
5.NEURALGIC AMYOTROPHY
5.SINGHS INDEX
MAY 2004 NOVEMBER 2003
8.CHONDROBLASTOMA(TACHDJIAN ; BENIGN
MUSCULOSKELETAL TUMOUR)
2.OLLIERS DISEASE
4.BRODIES ABSCESS
5.FROZEN SHOULDER
6.CHARCOTS JOINT
8.CODMANS TRIANGLE
9.SHENTONS LINE
JUNE 2012 NOV 2011
PAPER 3 PAPER 3
9.KEINBOCKS DISEASE
MAY 2011 NOV 2010
PAPER 3 PAPER 3
ESSAY (20 MARKS)
ESSAY (20 MARKS)
1. DESCRIBE FACTORS CONTRIBUTING TO
STABILITY OF SHOULDER JOINT. WHAT ARE THE 1. WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY SERONEGATIVE
PATHOLOGICAL CHANGES IN RECURRENT ARTHROPATHIES? (KUL 1- 886)
ANTERIOR SHOULDER DISLOCATION. DISCUSS
THE RECENT TRENDS IN MANAGEMENT OF ENUMERATE THE DISEASES WHICH ARE
RECURRENT SHOULDER DISLOCATION
INCLUDED IN THIS ENTITY. DISCUSS THE ROLE
SHORT ESSAYS (8X10=80 MARKS) OF SURGERY IN ANY ONE OF THEM.
PAPER 3 PAPER 3
PAPER 3 PAPER 3
PAPER 3 PAPER 3
1. DEFINE AND DESCRIBE SCFE AND DISCUSS ITS 1. DISCUSS IN DETAIL PRIMARY
MANAGEMENT. HYPERPARATHYROIDISM.
9.WINGING OF SCAPULA
NOV 2006 JUNE 2005
PAPER 3 PAPER 3
9.CLAW TOE
NOVEMBER 2004 9.TRIPLE DEFORMITY
PAPER 3
7.BANKARTS LESION
MS ORTHO
PAPER 4
OSTEOSYNTHESIS IN TREATMENT OF
SHORT ESSAYS (8X10=80 MARKS)
FRACTURES WITH RECENT ADVANCES
2.ADVANCES IN CEMENTING TECHNIQUES
8.PFN
9.POSTOPERATIVE DVT --
PREVENTION,CLINICAL
FEATURES,MANAGEMENT.
NOVEMBER 2011 MAY 2011
8.CEMENT DISEASE
8.CEMENT DISEASE
1. DISCUSS THE RECENT ADVANCES IN THE 1. DISCUSS THE RECENT ADVANCES IN THE
PREVENTION, INVESTIGATIONS AND INVESTIGATIONS AND MANAGEMENT OF
MANAGEMENT OF POST OPERATIVE INFECTION FRACTURE NON UNION .
IN ORTHOPAEDIC IMPLANTS
3.ARTHROSCOPIC RECONSTRUCTION OF
ACL(CAMPBELL ; SPORTS MEDICINE CH-KNEE
INJURIES)(CAMPBELL ; CH-ARTHROSCOPY OF
LOWER EXTREMITIES)
4.GAMMA NAIL
5.LC DCP
6.BIOLOGICAL FIXATION
7.BONE TRANSPORT
PAPER 4 PAPER 4
PAPER 4 PAPER 4
PAPER 4 PAPER 4
9.PEDICULAR INSTRUMENTATION
NOVEMBER 2007 MAY 2008
PAPER 4 PAPER 4
PAPER 4 PAPER 4
1. DESCRIBE THE PATHOLOGY AND THE 1. DEFINE AND CLASSIFY LUMBAR SPINAL
VARIOUS STAGES OF OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE STENOSIS.
PAPER 4 PAPER 4
8."TUBS" "AMBRII"
PAPER 4
3.POLYETHYLENE WEAR
D ORTHO
KUHS (2012-2014)
PAPERS 1-3
JUNE 2012 JUNE 2012
4. JEFERSON’S FRACTURE
SHORT ESSAYS (8 X 10=80 MARKS)
5. FUNCTIONAL CAST BRACING STEWART-
2. WALLERIAN NERVE DEGENERATION
PG215
CAMPBELL PERIPHERAL NERVE INJURIES
6. FRENCH OSTEOTOMY
3. ARTHROGRAPHY
7. RUPTURE OF EXTENSOR POLLICIS LONGUS
4. CRUSH SYNDROME
8. STRESS FRACTURE KULKARNI 1218
5. BROWN TUMER
9. COMPLICATIONS OF PELVIC FRACTURES
6. THOMAS TEST
7. SYMES AMPUTATION
PAPER 3 PAPER I
2. FIBROFASCITIS 2. ARDS
2. OSTEOPOROSIS.
SHORT ESSAYS (8 X 10=80 MARKS)
3. RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS.
2. BIOFILMS IN BONE AND JOINT INFECTIONS.
4. TORTICOLLIS.
3. FIBROMYALGIA .
5. CRUSH SYNDROME.
4. MYOSITIS OSSIFICANS .
6. THORACIC OUTLET SYNDROME.
5. AVASCULAR NECROSIS HEAD OF FEMUR.
7. DUPUYTREN'S CONTRACTURE. CAMPBELL ;
6. MILWAUKEE BRACE.
CH - THE HAND
7. RECENT ADVANCES IN OSTEOGENIC
8. REGIONAL ANESTHESIA FOR FOOT AND
SARCOMA.
ANKLE.
8. ARTHRODESIS OF THE WRIST JOINT.
9. CORROSION OF METALLIC IMPLANTS.
9. CAUDA EQUINA SYNDROME .
MAY 2013 NOVEMBER 2013
PAPER I PAPER II
2. CHRONIC OSTEOMYELITIS
SHORT ESSAYS (8 X 10=80 MARKS)
3. STIFF ELBOW
2. KRUKENBURG OPERATION.
4. SUDECKS OSTEODYSTROPHY
3. SYNOVIAL FLUID ANALYSIS. (TUREK CH13
5. FAT EMBOLISM GOPALAN PG 68
DISEASES OF JOINT)
6. HIP INSTABILITY
4. GIANT CELL TUMOR LOWER END RADIUS.
7. SPONDYLOLISTHESIS (CAMPBELL CH- CAMPBELL - BENIGN BONE TUMOURS
SCOLIOSIS&KYPHOSIS)
5. ARTHROGRYPOSIS MULTIPLEX CONGENITA.
8. GAS GANGRENE
CAMPBELL VOL2; NEURVOUS SYSTEM
9. BONE GRAFT DISORDERS IN CHILDREN
7. SPINAL SHOCK.
8. BONE HEALING.
9. CLAW HAND.
MAY 2014
ESSAY 20 MARKS
3. PHARMACOTHERAPY OF GOUT(TUREK CH 9
METABOLIC BONE DISEASE)
4. MRI IN SPINE
5. PERONEAL TENDINITIS
6. OSTEOID OSTEOMA
7. LIGAMENTOTAXIS
9. FOOT DROP
SECTION 7
D ORTHO
PAPER 1
PAPER 1 PAPER 1
PAPER 1 PAPER 1
PAPER 1 PAPER 1
PAPER 1 PAPER 1
1. DISCUSS THE SURGICAL ANATOMY OF KNEE 1.DISCUSS THE SURGICAL ANATOMY OF THE
JOINT IN RELATION TO INTERNAL KNEE
DERANGEMENT OF KNEE
PAPER 1 PAPER 1
1.DISCUSS THE ANATOMY OF SHOULDER JOINT 1.DISCUSS THE ANATOMY OF KNEE JOINT.
WITH REFERENCE TO INSTABILITIES OF DESCRIBE THE INJURIES OF MENISCI OF KNEE.
SHOULDER (CAMPBELL ; SPORTS MEDICINE CH-KNEE
INJURIES)(CAMPBELL ; CH-ARTHROSCOPY OF
LOWER EXTREMITIES)
SHORT ESSAYS (8X10=80 MARKS)
2.BONE GRAFT
SHORT ESSAYS (8X10=80 MARKS)
3.REFLEX SYMPATHETIC DYSTROPHY
2.SINOGRAM
4.TINELS SIGN
3.BIOLOGICAL PLASTICITY
5.SYNOVIAL FLUID(TUREK CH13 DISEASES OF
4.DISTRACTION HISTIOGENESIS KULKARNI PG
JOINT)
1519
6.MYELOGRAM
5.TOURNIQUET (STEWART-TOURNIQUET)
7.DMARD
6.RADIOLOGICAL FEATURES OF CDH
8.FOOT DROP
7.OSTEOPOROSIS
9.RADIO ULNAR JOINT
8.THORACIC OUTLET
PAPER 1 PAPER 1
PAPER 1 PAPER 1
PAPER 1
3.GAS GANGRENE
5.GENU RECURVATUM
PAPER 1 PAPER 1
9.SPINA BIFIDA
NOV 2010 JUNE 2010
PAPER 1 PAPER 1
PAPER 1 PAPER 1
2.KEINBOCKS DISEASE
SHORT ESSAYS (8X10=80 MARKS)
3.HYPERPARATHYROIDISM
2.FIBROUS ANKYLOSIS
4.OSTEOGENESIS IMPERFECTA (DAV-LOCAL
3.DMARD
COMPLICATIONS OF#; M/3RD) TACHDJIAN CH
32 (METABOLIC&ENDOCRINE DISEASES) 4.POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION
PAPER 1 PAPER 1
PAPER 1 PAPER 1
7.DMARD
PAPER 1 PAPER 1
5.AUTOTRANSFUSION
ESSAY (20 MARKS)
6.GLOMUS TUMOUR
1.DISCUSS THE FACTORS STABILISING THE
GLENOHUMERAL JOINT AND ITS IMPORTANCE 7.ANTALGIC GAIT
DORTHO
PAPER 2
PAPER 2 PAPER 2
PAPER 2 PAPER 2
PAPER 2 PAPER 2
9. BONE TRANSPORT
PAPER 2
PAPER 2 PAPER 2
1.CLASSIFY SPINAL INJURIES. DISCUSS THE 1.CLASSIFY INJURIES OF ANKLE. DISCUSS THE
MANAGEMENT OF UNSTABLE SPINAL INJURIES CLINICAL FEATURES AND TREATMENT OF
AND REHABILITATION OF PARAPLEGIA FRACTURES OF TALUS.
PAPER 2 PAPER 2
PAPER 2 PAPER 2
8.OLLIERS DISEASE
PAPER 2 PAPER 2
PAPER 2 PAPER 2
5.EMG (KUL 1- 900) (TUREK CH 14 ORTHOPEDIC 4.FRACTURE NECK OF TALUS (DAV-KNEE ANKLE
NEUROLOGY) TRAUMA; F/3RD, M/3RD)
PAPER 2 PAPER 2
PAPER 2 PAPER 2
PAPER 2 PAPER 2
PAPER 2 PAPER 2
DORTHO
PAPER 3
PAPER 3 PAPER 3
1. DESCRIBE THE BLOOD SUPPLY OF TIBIA. 1. DISCUSS THE RECENT ADVANCES IN TOTAL
CLASSIFY NON UNION AND DISCUSS THE HIP REPLACEMENT WITH SPECIAL EMPHASIS IN
MANAGEMENT OF INFECTED GAP NON UNION CEMENTING TECHNIQUES AND BEARING
OF TIBIA SURFACES KULKARNI 3702, GOPALAN 673
PAPER 3 PAPER 3
1. DISCUSS THE PRINCIPLES, MERITS AND 1. DISCUSS THE RECENT ADVANCES IN THR
DEMERITS OF LCP. DISCUSS THE RECENT WITH SPECIAL EMPHASIS ON BEARING
ADVANCES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF SURFACES, TISSUE INGROWTH, CEMENTING
OSTEOPOROTIC FRACTURES TECHNIQUES AND COMPUTER ASSISSTED
SURGERY
8.MIPPO
9. BONE SUBSTITUTES
MAY 2010 NOV 2009 (RPT OF DEC 2008)
PAPER 3
MAY 2009
2.BIOFILM -INTERNET
SHORT ESSAYS (8X10=80 MARKS)
3.SURGICAL DISLOCATION OF HIP
2.ARTHRODIASTASIS
4.TOTAL ELBOW REPLACEMENT
3.FLOATING KNEE
5.SURFACE REPLACEMENT OF HIP KULKARNI
4.PILON FRACTURE
3706
5.MIPPO
6.SINGLE EVENT MULTILEVEL SURGERY IN
CEREBRAL PALSY (CAMPBELL VOL 2 ; NERVOUS 6.BIODEGRADABLE IMPLANT (CAMPBELL
SYSTEM DISORDERS IN CHILDREN) ,GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF FRACTURE
TREATMENT; BIOMECHANICS)
7.VERTEBROPLASTY (KUL 1 - 190)
7.SOMATOS ENSORY EVOKED POTENTIALS
8.CONTINOUS PASSIVE MOTION
(CAMPBELL CH- SCOLIOSIS&KYPHOSIS)
9. FLOOR REACTION ORTHOSIS
8.LCP
9. BOTULINUM TOXIN
DEC 2008 OCTOBER 2007
PAPER 3 PAPER 3
PAPER 3 PAPER 3
PAPER 3 PAPER 3
ESSAY (2 X 30 = 60MARKS)
4.BONE TRANSPLANT
PAPER 3 PAPER 3
PAPER 3 PAPER 3
PAPER 3 PAPER 3
PAPER 3 PAPER 3
PAPER 3 PAPER 3
PAPER 3 PAPER 3
1. WHAT IS COLD ABSCESS? DESCRIBE THE 1. DISCUSS THE CURRENT TRENDS IN THE
ANATOMICAL BASISOF COLD ABSCESS AT DIAGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT OF BONE AND
VARIOUS SPINE LEVELS JOINT INFECTIONS.
PAPER 3 PAPER 3
BOOKS
ZUKERMAN,KOVAL -- MOST TRAUMA QUESTIONS CAN BE GOT FROM THIS TINY CHAMP
DAV -- DAVENGRE NOTES (F/3 --FIRST THIRD) , (L/3 --LAST THIRD) -- MOST TOPICS BUT GOTTA
SEARCH
GOPALAN-- LAST MINUTE READ, GOOD ONLY IF U HAVE READ /LEARNED THE TOPIC EARLIER FROM
BOOKS THAT GIVE THE TOPIC IN DETAIL
KULKARNI - ONLY LIMITED TOPICS. SOME CHAPTERS ARE TOO GOOD, SOME REALLY BAD
APLEY
FINALLY FOR SOME ELUSIVE TOPICS (LIKE BIOFILMS) DO SEARCH THE NET.
321 | Q & A
322 | Q & A