Continuation 2
Continuation 2
Detailed Description Of The Steps In The Process: (Whether applied to the individual, family or community)
2. ASSESSMENT OF NEEDS; Taking into consideration personal, environmental and psycho-socio-cultural factors
influencing health.
Situation and trends revealed in personal and social history
Physical and emotional/ intellectual ability to perform or function.
Attitudes, knowledge and perceptions of health and illness.
Health behaviors and patterns of health care.
Resources available to meet own needs.
Other factors associated with risk of prevailing health problems.
4. EVALUATION OF CARE:
The analysis of the effectiveness of care provided, based on systematic documentation, monitoring
and observation in relation to:
Accuracy, completeness and regularity of assessment
Individual, family and community participation
Quality, scope and timeliness of care provided
Health outcomes and interpretations of observed differences with suggested changes.
GUIDELINES OF ACTIVITIES IN FAMILY HEALTH PRACTICE:
HOME VISIT:
Professional contact made by the health worker or on behalf of a client or family to further a special activity of the
agency.
Face to face professional contact of significant public health content which is recorded.
PRINCIPLES:
1. A home visit should have a purpose or objective.
2. Planning for the home visit should make use of all available information about the client and his family.
3. Planning should revolve around the essential needs of the individual or family.
4. Planning for continuing care should involve the individual and his family.
5. Determines the frequency of the home visit.
PURPOSES:
1. To give care to the sick; teaching a responsible member of a family to give subsequent care.
2. To find out living conditions of the client and family in order to fit a health teaching need.
3. To teach health practices, prevention of disease and correction of defects for better living.
4. To detect, help prevent and report of communicable diseases.
5. To establish close relationship between health agencies and the public for the promotion of public health.
6. To make use of the referral system and use of community services.
4 LEVELS OF CLIENTELE:
1. INDIVIDUAL: client the health worker sees in the health care setting with specific health problems.
2. FAMILY: problematic/priority/high-risk families
3. POPULATION GROUP: population group at risks or with a defined health problem to whom the health worker
delivers promotive, preventive, curative or rehabilitative care.
4. COMMUNITY: the population at large is the recipient of a particular health service.
A family that is able to perform the following health tasks in the face of a health problem is considered to be
coping effectively.
3. PREVENTIVE POTENTIAL:
Refers to the nature and magnitude of future problems that can be minimized or totally
prevented if intervention is done on the problem under consideration.
4. SALIENCE:
Refers to the family’s perception and evaluation of the problem in terms of seriousness and
urgency of the attention needed.
The health worker evaluates family’s perception of a problem. As a general rule, the family’s
concerns and felt needs require priority attention.
TO DECIDE PREVENTIVE POTENTIAL:
3. CURRENT MANAGEMENT:
Refers to the presence and appropriateness of intervention measures instituted to remedy the
problem.
The institution of appropriate intervention increases the problem’s preventive potential.
CRITERIA WEIGHT
1. NATURE OF PROBLEM PRESENTED 1
Health Threat 2
Health Deficit 3
Forseeable Crisis 1
2. MODIFIABILITY OF PROBLEM 2
Easily Modifiable 2
Partially Modifiable 1
Not Modifiable
3. PREVENTIVE POTENTIAL 1
High 3
Moderate 2
Low 1
4. SALIENCE 1
Serious Problem, immediate attention needed 2
Problem not needing immediate attention 1
Not a felt need/ problem 0
Scoring:
1. Decide on score for each criteria.
2. Divide the score by the highest possible score and multiply by weight.
3. Sum up the scores for all the criteria. The highest score is 5
The higher the score of a given problem the more likely it is taken as priority.
EXAMPLE: This scale for prioritizing problems is utilized either for Individual/ Family.
TOTAL SCORE: 4