The document discusses the philosophical study of ethics and morality, outlining key principles such as universalizability and impartiality. It explores various branches of ethics including normative ethics, metaethics, and applied ethics, while also detailing historical perspectives from Greek philosophers to modern ethical theories. Additionally, it covers moral theories like consequentialism, deontology, and virtue ethics, emphasizing the importance of character and the nature of rightness and goodness.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
23 views4 pages
SAMPLE+PROBLEMS Depletion
The document discusses the philosophical study of ethics and morality, outlining key principles such as universalizability and impartiality. It explores various branches of ethics including normative ethics, metaethics, and applied ethics, while also detailing historical perspectives from Greek philosophers to modern ethical theories. Additionally, it covers moral theories like consequentialism, deontology, and virtue ethics, emphasizing the importance of character and the nature of rightness and goodness.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4
ETHICS Universal Perspective
• Ethics is the philosophical study of morality. • Principle of universalizability—the idea that a
moral statement (a principle, rule, or judgment) that Morality: The set of rules or principles that guides applies in one situation must apply in all other behaviour (what people believe is right or wrong). situations that are relevantly similar. Ethics: The philosophical study of those rules and principles (why people consider something right or Principle of Impartiality wrong) • It means that the welfare and interests of each individual should be given the same weight as the • Morality refers to beliefs concerning right and welfare and interests of all others. wrong, good and bad— beliefs that can include judgments, values, rules, principles, and theories. Dominance of Moral Norms They help guide our actions, dene our values, and • Not all norms are moral norms. There are legal give us reasons for being the persons we are. It norms (laws, statutes), aesthetic norms (for judging addresses the question: “How ought we to live?” artistic creations), prudential norms (practical “What to do???” considerations of self-interest), and others. Moral considerations usually override the others; they • But even though in life ethics is inescapable and seem more important, more critical, or more important, you are still free to take the easy way weighty. out…You are free not to think too deeply or too systematically about ethical concerns OVERVIEW OF ITS HISTORY Greeks: “How can a person use reason to achieve DIVISIONS/BRANCHES “the good life?” • Normative Ethics: What should we do? - We do normative ethics when we use critical Socrates believed in the existence of objective reasoning to demonstrate that a moral principle is ethical standards while noting how difficult it was for justified, or that a professional code of conduct is us to specify them. contradictory, or that one proposed moral theory is Is something good because the gods love it, or the better than another, or that a person’s motive is gods love something because it is good? (Euthyphro) good. Plato: all things in the visible realm, qua intelligible, • Metaethics: What is the nature of morality? participate in separate forms that are invisible, - What does it mean for an action to be right? Does unchanging, and perfect. Thus there is a form even this specific moral statement make sense? for moral predicates, such as justice and happiness. The highest of all forms, and one very difficult to • Applied Ethics: How can this principle be applied in grasp, is the form of the Good a particular issue? -Did the doctor do right in performing that abortion? Aristotle: rejected Plato’s metaphysical claim that Is it morally permissible for scientists to perform separated forms exist apart from things in which experiments on people without their consent? Was they participate. it right for the journalist to distort her reporting to • So there is not one separate form of the Good, but aid a particular side in the war? many “goods,” each of which is a quality of a particular thing or function. ELEMENTS • wise persons seek an end that is self-sucient, nal, Preeminence of Reason and attainable over one’s life (eudaemonia) • Our use of critical reasoning and argument helps us • eudaemonia/happiness = ourishing; the highest keep our feelings about moral issues in perspective. good • To attain eudaemonia = need arete = by mestos Medieval: Jesus’ command to love God I. Consequentialism - Utilitarianism St. Paul: outlined the way to achieve not an earthly - Egoism “good life,” as the Greeks did, but heavenly - Pragmatism beatitude with God (eternal Salvation) II. Non-consequentialism - Deontological Ethics St. Augustine: City of God / City of Man -Divine Command Theory -Natural Law Theory St. Thomas: Aristotelian Ethics -Virtue Ethics • all actions are directed towards determinate ends and ultimately a final end I. Consequentialism • happiness is the final end - the morally right action is the one that results in • choice involves selecting means for this final end the most favorable balance of good over bad. • an agent needs a moral character developed through the habits of choice to realize this UTILITARIANISM: Happiness • Utility - overall happiness or well-being; measure of the positive outcomes (pleasure, happiness, or Modern: rejected the medieval idea that we should satisfaction) minus the negative outcomes (pain, look to God for a guide to our actions suffering, or dissatisfaction). • The purpose of ethics is not to instruct humans • Goal: maximize utility (create the greatest possible how best to love God, but, rather, to show humans amount of happiness and the least amount of how best to live together in this world. suffering) • Hedonistic: great pleasure/least pain Hobbes: state of nature; to follow the will of a • Preference: right action is the one that best fulfills sovereign with absolute power. the preferences or interests of those affected. Hume: the source of ethical judgments is our • Act-Utilitarianism: "What action, in this particular sentiments (fellow-feeling) situation, will produce the greatest overall good?" Kant: Reason deems the act ethical or unethical, • Rule-Utilitarianism: considers the long-term while feelings and experience merely cloud the benefits of consistently following certain rules issue. • Kant’s categorical imperative functions as the test ETHICAL EGOISM of reason that an act must pass in order for it to be • The morally right action is the one that produces ethical the most favorable balance of good over evil for oneself. MORAL THEORY • Is it the same with selfishness? A moral theory is an explanation of what makes an • Ethical egoism does not necessarily endorse action right or what makes a person or thing good. actions that yield immediate pleasure or advantage. Its focus is not the rightness or goodness of specific Instead, it can involve a long-term perspective, actions or persons but the very nature of rightness where short-term sacrifices may be justified if they or goodness itself. lead to greater long-term gains for oneself. • Moral theories concerned with the goodness of persons or things are known as theories of value. PRAGMATISM • Moral theories concerned with the rightness or • Pragmatism asserts that the truth and morality of wrongness of actions are called theories of ideas and actions are determined by their practical obligation consequences. In ethical terms, this means that an action is right if it leads to desirable outcomes and wrong if it leads to undesirable outcomes. 4. Formula of the Kingdom of Ends: “Act according II. Non-consequentialism to maxims of a universally legislating member of a - It depends primarily, or completely, on the nature merely possible kingdom of ends.” of the action itself 5. Formula of the Law of Nature: “Act as if the maxims of your action were to become through your DEONTOLOGY/CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE will a universal law of nature.” • Principle of Universalizability: The principle of universalizability states that an action is morally right NATURAL LAW THEORY if and only if the maxim (or principle) behind it can • Right action follows the dictates of nature be consistently willed as a universal law that • In this grand order, natural laws relect how the everyone could follow in similar circumstances. world is as well as how it should be. • Maxim: A maxim is a subjective principle of action, • To act morally is to act naturally essentially a rule that an individual follows when deciding to act in a certain way. For example, DIVINE COMMAND THEORY "I will lie to avoid embarrassment" can be a maxim. • morally right action is the one that God commands • Universal Law: To test the moral worth of a • an action may be deemed right even though it maxim, one must ask if it could be universally does not maximize the good, or deemed wrong even applied. This means imagining a world where if it does maximize the good everyone acts according to the same maxim. • Consistency: The maxim must be consistent when VIRTUE ETHICS universalized. If the universalization of the maxim Virtue ethics is an ethical theory that focuses on leads to a contradiction or an undesirable world, those character traits that make someone a good or then the action is not morally permissible. admirable person rather than simply on the actions the person performs. TEST YOUR MAXIM According to Socrates and virtue ethics, being • Formulate the Maxim: Clearly state the principle moral boils down to being successful at the art of guiding your action. living. • Universalize the Maxim: Imagine a world where Socrates asserted that the most important goal for everyone acts according to this maxim. humans is not just living but “living well.” Test for Contradiction: • Contradiction in Conception: Is it logically possible VIRTUE for everyone to follow this maxim? If the maxim Meaning: a trait of character that is to be admired cannot be consistently conceived as a universal law, and desired because it is a constituent of human it is impermissible. excellence. • Contradiction in Will: Even if a maxim is Virtues are intrinsically valuable for their own sake, conceivable as a universal law, would you rationally but they are also valued will it to be so? because they promote human flourishing both for the individual who Five Formulations: possesses them and for society in general. 1. Formula of Universal Law: “Act only according to that maxim whereby you can at the same time will VIRTUE ETHICS’ FIVE THEMES that it should become a universal law.” 1. Virtues Are Necessary Conditions for Human 2. Formula of Humanity: “Act in such a way that you Flourishing and Well-Being treat humanity, whether in your own person or in 2. Moral Rules Are Inadequate Unless They Are the person of any other, always at the same time as Grounded in a Virtue-Based an end, never merely as a means.” Ethics 3. Formula of Autonomy: “Act only so that your will 3. Judgments about Character Are More can regard itself at the same time as making Fundamental Than Judgment about the Rightness universal law through its maxims.” or Wrongness of Conduct 4. Virtue Ethics Is More Comprehensive, Because It Deals with the Whole Person and Not Simply the Person Insofar as He or She Performs an Action 5. The Key to Morality Is Found in the Character of Moral Role Models