Unit 4
Unit 4
Edgar Schein's theory emphasizes that an organization’s underlying assumptions form the foundation of its
culture, influencing its espoused values and, ultimately, its visible artifacts. While artifacts are easy to
observe and change, assumptions are deeply ingrained and shape every aspect of the organization. Lasting
change requires addressing these core assumptions, as failure to uncover or understand them risks limiting
transformation to superficial levels, without impacting the deeper cultural elements driving organizational
behavior.
Applying Schein’s layers in reverse - Schein’s framework can also be applied top-down. Introducing new
artifacts—such as updated tools, systems, or policies—can influence an organization’s espoused values and
eventually filter down to reshape its foundational assumptions. For instance, implementing an equal, paid
parental leave policy for both parents sends a clear message about gender equity, gradually embedding this
value into the organization’s core culture.
Remote Work - The relevance of Schein’s model is evident in contemporary challenges like remote work
Remote work, accelerated by the Covid pandemic, disrupted traditional artifacts like physical office spaces
and in-person interactions, forcing organizations to reassess their values around collaboration, flexibility,
and communication in virtual environments.
Diversity Inclusion - Underlying assumptions play a crucial role in either fostering inclusivity or
perpetuating systemic biases. To build genuine inclusivity, organizations must confront and reshape these
deep-seated beliefs, as surface-level changes alone are insufficient. Schein’s model provides a valuable
framework for understanding and addressing these cultural complexities, ensuring that changes reflect and
reinforce a deeper cultural transformation.
Importance of corporate culture
Organisational Health
Health
To understand Occupational health, one needs to comprehend Health in its various forms.
Health has been defined by the World Health Organization as a complete state of physical, mental and
social well-being, not merely the absence of disease or infirmity (WHO, 1948).
However, this definition has been criticised for focusing on an idealised and largely unattainable set of end-
points.
“[Health is] the extent to which an individual or group is able, on the one hand, to realise aspirations and
satisfy needs; and, on the other hand, to change or cope with the environment. Health is, therefore, seen as a
resource for everyday life, not the object of living; it is a positive concept emphasizing social and personal
resources, as well as physical capacities.”
Organizational health is a company’s ability to unite and respond to a shared goal. This is showcased in how
a leader makes decisions, allocates resources, operates daily, and leads their team. The concept arose from
occupational health, which broadly focuses on building a workplace where employees feel valued.
Organizational health connects that idea more explicitly to the overall success of a business.
This definition has a number of important implications for the practice of health promotion.
● First, health is not just a unit of measurement that applies to individuals, but is also applicable to
groups and, by extension, whole populations. Health promotion initiatives therefore need to be as
concerned about group-based outcomes such as cohesiveness, harmony, and social
inclusion/exclusion, not just individual-level outcomes (e.g., anxiety, optimism, and happiness).
● The second implication referred to in the above definition is that health outcomes represent resources
that serve a very functional purpose. Forces that shape these resources (positively or negatively)
ultimately impact on the individual’s or group’s ability to carry out everyday tasks and to fulfil
important goals and aspirations.
● The third point raised in the above definition is that the surrounding environment can impact on
people’s health and, in turn, that health is required to cope with or change environmental forces.
Highlighting the dynamic interactions between people and their social, economic and physical
environments suggests that any attempts to change people’s health status need to take into account
both environmental influences as well as personal and group-based capacities.
● The fourth is the concept of control. By acknowledging that health is, in part, a reflection of people’s
ability to change their surrounding environments, this definition suggests that health promotion
needs to assess the extent to which individuals and groups have decision-making control over the
physical, social, and political environments in which they live and work.
Definitions of a healthy organisation :
A. Individual perspective :
Enterprise for Health network describes a healthy organisation as one whose culture, management, working
climate, and other business practices create an environment that promotes the health, effectiveness, and
performance of its employees.
A. Business Perspective :
De Geus (1997) introduced the concept of ‘the living company’ and researched the mortality and life
expectancy of firms. In this way, De Geus identified four basic characteristics of healthy companies: they are
sensitive to their environment (and are always learning to adapt); they are cohesive with a strong sense of
identity; they are tolerant to activities in the margin and to decentralized initiatives and experiments; and
they are conservative in financing.