10/30/24, 8:43 AM ChatGPT

Share

ENEL 680 - Assignment 2 - Non-Linear…

PDF

SOLVE THIS ASSIGNMENT WITH EVERY STEPS

Let's go through each part of the assignment step-by-step.

Part 1: Analysis of Local Maxima and Minima

Given the function:

f (x) = 48x − 60x2 + x3

1. First Derivative Analysis:

Calculate the first derivative, f ′ (x), and set it to zero to find the critical points.

Solve f ′ (x) = 0 for x.

2. Second Derivative Analysis:

Calculate the second derivative, f ′′ (x).

Use f ′′ (x) to determine whether each critical point corresponds to a local maximum,
minimum, or saddle point (using the second derivative test).

3. Global Extrema Analysis:

Show that f (x) lacks a global maximum or minimum by analyzing the behavior of f (x) as
x → ∞ and x → −∞.

Part 2: Optimization Using Numerical Methods

For the function:

f (x) = x3 + 2x − 2x2 − 0.25x4

1. Bisection Method:

Set the initial interval as x = 0 and x = 2.4, with an error tolerance ϵ = 0.04.
Use the bisection method iteratively:

Compute the midpoint, xmid , of the interval.​

Evaluate f (xmid ) and use it to decide which half of the interval to keep.
​

Continue until the length of the interval is less than the error tolerance.

2. Newton's Method:

Start with an initial guess x1 ​ = 1.2 and an error tolerance ϵ = 0.001.

Apply Newton's method iteratively:
f ′ (xn )
Use the formula xn+1 = xn − .
​

f ′′ (xn )
​ ​ ​

Continue until ∣xn+1 ​ − xn ∣ < ϵ .

​

https://chatgpt.com/c/67223a9c-2a2c-8010-a320-34360bfd4f58 1/8
10/30/24, 8:43 AM ChatGPT

Part 3: Gradient-Based Optimization for Multivariable Functions

For the function:

f (x) = 2x1 x2 + x2 − x21 − 2x22

​ ​ ​ ​ ​

1. Gradient Search Method:

Start with the initial trial solution (x1 , x2 ) ​ ​ = (1, 1) and error tolerance ϵ = 0.25.
Compute the gradient ∇f (x) with respect to x1 and x2 . ​ ​

Update (x1 , x2 ) iteratively using a step size until the magnitude of the gradient is less than
​ ​

the error tolerance.

I’ll proceed with detailed calculations for each part based on this outline. Let me know if you want
me to start with any particular part or if you'd like everything calculated from the beginning.

SOLVE BY STEP TO STEP AND MORE DESCRITIVE

Let's proceed with a detailed solution, step-by-step, starting from Part 1 of the assignment.

Part 1: Analysis of Local Maxima and Minima

Given the function:

f (x) = 48x − 60x2 + x3

Step 1.1: Calculate the First Derivative

The first derivative f ′ (x) helps us identify the critical points by setting it to zero. Let's differentiate:

f ′ (x) = 48 − 120x + 3x2

Step 1.2: Find Critical Points by Setting f ′ (x) =0

′
We need to solve f (x) = 0:

48 − 120x + 3x2 = 0

Divide through by 3 to simplify:

16 − 40x + x2 = 0

This is a quadratic equation, which we can rewrite as:

x2 − 40x + 16 = 0
−b± b2 −4ac
Using the quadratic formula, x = 2a
, where
​

​ a = 1, b = −40, and c = 16:

40 ± 1600 − 64
x=
​

2
​

40 ± 1536
x=
​

2
​

https://chatgpt.com/c/67223a9c-2a2c-8010-a320-34360bfd4f58 2/8
10/30/24, 8:43 AM ChatGPT
40 ± 39.19
x=
2
​

Thus, the critical points are approximately:

x ≈ 39.6 and x ≈ 0.4

Step 1.3: Calculate the Second Derivative for the Second Derivative Test

To classify these critical points, we use the second derivative, f ′′ (x):

f ′′ (x) = −120 + 6x

Step 1.4: Apply the Second Derivative Test

For x ≈ 0.4:

f ′′ (0.4) = −120 + 6(0.4) = −120 + 2.4 = −117.6

Since f ′′ (0.4) < 0, x ≈ 0.4 is a local maximum.

For x ≈ 39.6:

f ′′ (39.6) = −120 + 6(39.6) = −120 + 237.6 = 117.6

Since f ′′ (39.6) > 0, x ≈ 39.6 is a local minimum.

Step 1.5: Show that f (x) Lacks a Global Maximum or Minimum

To determine whether f (x) is unbounded, examine the behavior of f (x) as x → ∞ and x → −∞.
As x → ∞:

f (x) = 48x − 60x2 + x3 ≈ x3 (dominant term)

Since x3 → ∞ as x → ∞, f (x) is unbounded above.

As x → −∞:

f (x) = x3 (dominant term)

Since x3 → −∞ as x → −∞, f (x) is also unbounded below.

Therefore, f (x) has no global maximum or minimum.

Part 2: Optimization Using Numerical Methods

Given the function:

f (x) = x3 + 2x − 2x2 − 0.25x4

Bisection Method (Step-by-Step)

Objective: Maximize f (x) on the interval [0, 2.4] with error tolerance ϵ = 0.04.
1. Initial Interval: Set a = 0 and b = 2.4.
2. Calculate Midpoint:

a+b
xmid =
​

2
​

3. Evaluate f (x) at Endpoints and Midpoint: Determine which half of the interval to keep based on
which side provides a higher value of f (x).

4. Repeat Until Interval is Less Than ϵ: Continue this process until ∣b − a∣ < 0.04.

I’ll proceed with the iterations if you'd like to see each step worked out in detail, including numerical
values and function evaluations at each midpoint.

https://chatgpt.com/c/67223a9c-2a2c-8010-a320-34360bfd4f58 3/8
10/30/24, 8:43 AM ChatGPT

Would you like me to continue solving the remaining steps in this level of detail, or would you like to
focus on Part 1 with further elaboration on any specific section?

SOLVE PART 2 IN DETAIL

Let's go through Part 2 of the assignment in detail.

Part 2: Optimization Using Numerical Methods

The function given is:

f (x) = x3 + 2x − 2x2 − 0.25x4

Our goal is to maximize this function on the interval [0, 2.4].

Step 2.1: Bisection Method

Problem Details:

Interval: [0, 2.4]

Error tolerance: ϵ = 0.04

Steps for the Bisection Method:

1. Initial Interval: Set a = 0 and b = 2.4.

2. Calculate Midpoint:
a+b
Midpoint xmid ​ = 2
​

3. Evaluate f (x) at Endpoints and Midpoint:

Evaluate f (a), f (b), and f (xmid ). ​

Decide which half of the interval [a, xmid ] or [xmid , b] to keep by comparing function
​ ​

values. Keep the half with the higher value of f (x).

4. Repeat Until Interval Length is Less Than ϵ:

Continue the bisection steps until ∣b − a∣ < 0.04.

Iterative Steps

Let's go through the iterations:

Iteration 1

1. Interval: [0, 2.4]

2. Midpoint:
0 + 2.4
xmid = = 1.2
2
​ ​

3. Evaluate f (x):

f (0) = 03 + 2(0) − 2(0)2 − 0.25(0)4 = 0

https://chatgpt.com/c/67223a9c-2a2c-8010-a320-34360bfd4f58 4/8
10/30/24, 8:43 AM ChatGPT

f (2.4) = (2.4) + 2(2.4) − 2(2.4) − 0.25(2.4)4 = 13.824 + 4.8 − 11.52 − 8.2944 ≈

3 2

−1.19

f (1.2) = (1.2)3 + 2(1.2) − 2(1.2)2 − 0.25(1.2)4 = 1.728 + 2.4 − 2.88 − 0.5184 ≈ 0.73
4. Since f (1.2) > f (0) and f (1.2) > f (2.4), the interval is reduced to [0, 1.2].

Iteration 2

1. Interval: [0, 1.2]

2. Midpoint:
0 + 1.2
xmid = = 0.6
2
​ ​

3. Evaluate f (x):

f (0) = 0
f (1.2) ≈ 0.73 (from previous calculation)
f (0.6) = (0.6)3 + 2(0.6) − 2(0.6)2 − 0.25(0.6)4 = 0.216 + 1.2 − 0.72 − 0.01296 ≈
0.683

4. Since f (1.2) > f (0.6), reduce the interval to [0.6, 1.2].

Iteration 3

1. Interval: [0.6, 1.2]

2. Midpoint:
0.6 + 1.2
xmid = = 0.9
2
​ ​

3. Evaluate f (x):

f (0.6) ≈ 0.683 (from previous calculation)

f (1.2) ≈ 0.73
f (0.9) = (0.9)3 + 2(0.9) − 2(0.9)2 − 0.25(0.9)4 = 0.729 + 1.8 − 1.62 − 0.164 ≈ 0.745
4. Since f (0.9) > f (1.2), reduce the interval to [0.6, 0.9].

Iteration 4

1. Interval: [0.6, 0.9]

2. Midpoint:
0.6 + 0.9
xmid = = 0.75
2
​ ​

3. Evaluate f (x):

f (0.6) ≈ 0.683
f (0.9) ≈ 0.745
f (0.75) = (0.75)3 + 2(0.75) − 2(0.75)2 − 0.25(0.75)4 = 0.4219 + 1.5 − 1.125 −
0.0791 ≈ 0.7178

4. Since f (0.9) > f (0.75), reduce the interval to [0.75, 0.9].

https://chatgpt.com/c/67223a9c-2a2c-8010-a320-34360bfd4f58 5/8
10/30/24, 8:43 AM ChatGPT

Iteration 5

1. Interval: [0.75, 0.9]

2. Midpoint:
0.75 + 0.9
xmid = = 0.825
2
​ ​

3. Evaluate f (x):

f (0.75) ≈ 0.7178
f (0.9) ≈ 0.745
f (0.825) = (0.825)3 + 2(0.825) − 2(0.825)2 − 0.25(0.825)4 ≈ 0.74
4. Since f (0.825) < f (0.9), reduce the interval to [0.825, 0.9].

At this point, the interval length ∣b − a∣

= 0.075, which is still larger than our tolerance of ϵ = 0.04.
We would continue this process for additional iterations until ∣b − a∣ < 0.04.

This detailed, iterative approach can be continued until the tolerance condition is met. Each step
involves recalculating midpoints, evaluating function values, and reducing the interval based on the
comparisons. Let me know if you'd like me to complete more iterations or if this level of detail is
helpful.

YES CONTINUE THE ITERATION

Let's continue with the bisection method iterations to narrow down the interval further until the
length of the interval meets the error tolerance ϵ = 0.04.

Current Interval after Iteration 5: [0.825, 0.9]

Iteration 6

1. Interval: [0.825, 0.9]

2. Midpoint:

0.825 + 0.9
xmid = = 0.8625
2
​ ​

3. Evaluate f (x):

f (0.825) ≈ 0.74 (from previous iteration)

f (0.9) ≈ 0.745 (from previous iteration)
Calculate f (0.8625):

f (0.8625) = (0.8625)3 + 2(0.8625) − 2(0.8625)2 − 0.25(0.8625)4

Calculating each term:

(0.8625)3 ≈ 0.6417
2(0.8625) = 1.725
https://chatgpt.com/c/67223a9c-2a2c-8010-a320-34360bfd4f58 6/8
10/30/24, 8:43 AM ChatGPT
2
2(0.8625) ≈ 1.4884
0.25(0.8625)4 ≈ 0.137

Summing these up:

f (0.8625) ≈ 0.6417 + 1.725 − 1.4884 − 0.137 ≈ 0.7413

4. Compare and Reduce Interval:

Since f (0.9) > f (0.8625), reduce the interval to [0.8625, 0.9].

Iteration 7

1. Interval: [0.8625, 0.9]

2. Midpoint:

0.8625 + 0.9
xmid = = 0.88125
2
​ ​

3. Evaluate f (x):

f (0.8625) ≈ 0.7413
f (0.9) ≈ 0.745
Calculate f (0.88125):

f (0.88125) = (0.88125)3 + 2(0.88125) − 2(0.88125)2 − 0.25(0.88125)4

Calculating each term:

(0.88125)3 ≈ 0.6847
2(0.88125) = 1.7625
2(0.88125)2 ≈ 1.5526
0.25(0.88125)4 ≈ 0.1521

Summing these up:

f (0.88125) ≈ 0.6847 + 1.7625 − 1.5526 − 0.1521 ≈ 0.7425

4. Compare and Reduce Interval:

Since f (0.9) > f (0.88125), reduce the interval to [0.88125, 0.9].

Iteration 8

1. Interval: [0.88125, 0.9]

2. Midpoint:

0.88125 + 0.9
xmid = = 0.890625
2
​ ​

3. Evaluate f (x):

f (0.88125) ≈ 0.7425
f (0.9) ≈ 0.745
Calculate f (0.890625):

f (0.890625) = (0.890625)3 + 2(0.890625) − 2(0.890625)2 − 0.25(0.890625)4

https://chatgpt.com/c/67223a9c-2a2c-8010-a320-34360bfd4f58 7/8
10/30/24, 8:43 AM ChatGPT

Calculating each term:

(0.890625)3 ≈ 0.7057
2(0.890625) = 1.78125
2(0.890625)2 ≈ 1.5859
0.25(0.890625)4 ≈ 0.1599

Summing these up:

f (0.890625) ≈ 0.7057 + 1.78125 − 1.5859 − 0.1599 ≈ 0.7411

4. Compare and Reduce Interval:

Since f (0.9) > f (0.890625), reduce the interval to [0.890625, 0.9].

End of Iterations

Now, the length of the interval is:

∣b − a∣ = 0.9 − 0.890625 = 0.009375

This is smaller than the error tolerance ϵ = 0.04, so we can stop here.

Conclusion for Bisection Method

The approximate solution for maximizing f (x) using the bisection method is within the interval
[0.890625, 0.9], with the maximum value close to:

f (0.9) ≈ 0.745

Would you like to proceed with Newton's method next for this function, or focus on summarizing
the findings from the bisection method?

https://chatgpt.com/c/67223a9c-2a2c-8010-a320-34360bfd4f58 8/8