Generating and Detecting Various Types of Fake Image and Audio Content: A Review of

Modern Deep Learning Technologies and Tools

Arash Dehghani1*, Hossein Saberi2

1,2
Faculty of Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science, Imam Hossein Comprehensive University
1
[email protected], 2 hsaberi @ihu.ac.ir

Abstract
This paper reviews the state-of-the-art in deepfake generation and detection, focusing on modern deep
learning technologies and tools based on the latest scientific advancements. The rise of deepfakes,
leveraging techniques like Variational Autoencoders (VAEs), Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs),
Diffusion models and other generative models, presents significant threats to privacy, security, and
democracy. This fake media can deceive individuals, discredit real people and organizations, facilitate
blackmail, and even threaten the integrity of legal, political, and social systems. Therefore, finding
appropriate solutions to counter the potential threats posed by this technology is essential. We explore
various deepfake methods, including face swapping, voice conversion, reenactment and lip
synchronization, highlighting their applications in both benign and malicious contexts. The review
critically examines the ongoing "arms race" between deepfake generation and detection, analyzing the
challenges in identifying manipulated contents. By examining current methods and highlighting future
research directions, this paper contributes to a crucial understanding of this rapidly evolving field and the
urgent need for robust detection strategies to counter the misuse of this powerful technology. While
focusing primarily on audio, image, and video domains, this study allows the reader to easily grasp the
latest advancements in deepfake generation and detection.

Key Words
Deepfake Generation, Deepfake Detection, Artificial Intelligence, Deep Neural Networks, Deep Learning,
Variational Autoencoders, Generative Adversarial Networks

1. Introduction
Deep learning has successfully been applied to solve various complex problems,
ranging from big data analysis to computer vision and human-level control.
However, advancements in deep learning have also been used to create software that
can threaten privacy, democracy, and national security. One such deep learning-
based application that has recently emerged is the deepfake, first appearing in 2017
]1[. Deepfake algorithms, lexically derived from "deep" learning and "fake," can
create fake images, videos, audio, and text that are difficult for humans to distinguish
from authentic samples ]2[. Deepfakes typically refer to the manipulation of existing
media or the generation of new (synthetic) media using machine learning-based

*
Corresponding author, E-mail address: [email protected] (Arash Dehghani)
approaches. The most commonly discussed deepfake data are fake facial images,
fake speech synthesis, and fake videos that incorporate both fake images and speech.
Voice conversion (VC) is a technology that can be used to alter an audio to sound as
if it were spoken by a different person (target) than the original speaker (source).
Previously, other methods such as traditional visual effects or computer graphics
approaches were used to generate fake content. However, recently, the common
underlying mechanism for creating deepfakes is deep learning models like
Variational Autoencoders (VAEs), Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), and
Diffusion models, widely used in computer vision. In general, the generation of fake
content has shifted from traditional graphics-based methods to deep learning-based
approaches ]3[. With advancements in deep learning, techniques primarily provided
by autoencoders and generative adversarial networks have achieved remarkable
generative results. Recently, the emergence of diffusion models with powerful
generation capabilities has spurred a new wave of research. In a narrow sense,
deepfakes refer to facial forgery. Face swapping is a remarkable task in generating
face-based fake content and is accomplished by transferring the source face to the
destination while preserving the facial movements and expressions of the destination
]4[. In a broader sense, it also includes the entire image composition and is not
limited to the face, widely termed AIGC (AI-generated content) ]5[.
Since creating realistic digital humans has positive consequences, positive uses of
deepfakes exist, such as their applications in visual effects, digital avatars, Snapchat
filters, creating voices for people who have lost their voices or updating parts of
films without reshooting, video games, virtual reality, film productions, and
entertainment, realistic dubbing of foreign films, education through the revival of
historical figures, trying on clothes while shopping, etc. ]2[. However, when used
maliciously, deepfakes can have detrimental consequences for political and social
organizations, including decreased public trust in institutions, political manipulation,
influencing elections, destabilizing public trust in political institutions, damaging the
reputations of prominent individuals, and influencing public opinion ]6[.
Furthermore, this technology allows malicious actors to create and distribute non-
consensual explicit content to cause harassment and reputational damage or create
convincing forgeries of individuals to deceive others for financial or personal gain.
Moreover, the increased use of deepfakes poses a serious issue in digital forensics,
contributing to a general crisis of trust and authenticity in digital evidence used in
legal proceedings, and can further lead to malicious uses such as blackmail,
extortion, forgery, identity theft, character assassination, and deepfake pornography
]7 ,1[. Especially since creating manipulated images and videos is now much easier,
as only a photograph of the target's identity or a short video of an individual is needed
to generate fake content ]8[.
The negative aspect of this new technique highlights another popular area of study:
the detection of deepfake-generated content, one example of which aims to identify
fake faces from real ones. With the rapid development of deepfake-related studies
in the community, both sides (generation and detection) have formed a neck-and-
neck competition, pushing each other's advancements and inspiring new avenues.
Besides deepfake generation, detection technologies are constantly evolving to
mitigate the potential misuse of deepfakes, such as privacy violations and phishing
attacks ]3[. Cybersecurity in the deepfake domain requires not only research into
detection but also investigation into generation methods ]4[. Therefore, finding truth
in the digital realm has become increasingly crucial. This is even more challenging
when dealing with deepfakes because they are primarily used for malicious
purposes, and almost anyone can create fake content these days using readily
available deepfake tools. Numerous methods for deepfake detection have been
proposed to date ]2[. The importance of this work is such that the U.S. Defense
Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) has initiated a research program in
the area of media forensics (called MediFor) to accelerate the development of
methods for detecting fake digital visual media.
This paper comprehensively reviews the latest advancements in deepfake generation
and detection, offering a summary analysis of the current state-of-the-art in this
rapidly evolving field. The next section outlines the motivation for this work.
Chapter three will delve into the history of the technology, roadmap, and related
work, outlining the tools and methods used in deepfake generation and detection.
Chapter four will describe the various types of deepfakes focusing on four well-
known deepfake research areas: face swapping, voice conversion, lip
synchronization, talking face generation, and facial feature editing, and chapter five
will discuss deepfake detection. Finally, a summary and conclusion will be presented
in the last chapter.

2. Motivation
Research in deepfake generation and detection is driven by several crucial
motivations, reflecting both technological advancements and societal implications.
Recently, the proliferation of artificially generated content has made deepfake
generation and detection techniques a compelling research area. The increasing
accessibility of content generation tools has made them a convenient option for illicit
activities worldwide. While some positive uses exist, they are predominantly used
to create and disseminate fake content. As malicious and harmful applications
proliferate faster than beneficial ones, the study of deepfakes has become critically
important in the current climate ]9[. This research is vital not only for academic
purposes but also for practical applications in law enforcement and digital content
verification. Furthermore, understanding the motivations behind deepfake creation,
ranging from entertainment to malicious intent, can inform strategies for regulation
and public awareness, ultimately fostering a more informed society capable of
navigating the complexities introduced by this technology. This work aims to
provide a comprehensive discussion of the fundamental principles of deepfakes in
the realms of audio, video, and image generation, as well as current tools for
deepfake detection.

3. Background and related work

This section begins with a brief introduction to the background and related works.
We will then describe the tools used for generating deepfake content, considering
both academic works and widely used open-source software. The manipulation of
image and video content, developed in the 19th century and soon applied to moving
images, is not new. For this purpose, several dedicated software tools such as Adobe
Photoshop and Adobe Lightroom have been available for decades ]1[. Deepfake
technology has been developed by researchers in academic institutions since the
1990s and later by amateurs in online communities. Recently, these methods have
been adopted by industry. Before deepfakes, images or videos were manipulated
using image/video splicing, also known as copy-move forgery ]7[. For images,
specific parts are cut and pasted onto another area. Thus, images are manipulated by
overwriting another image. However, these methods required significant expertise,
were time-consuming, and often resulted in noticeable artifacts. The advent of deep
learning, specifically Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), Variational
Autoencoders (VAEs), and more recently, diffusion models, revolutionized the
creation of realistic fake content. These techniques, initially developed within
academic research, have been increasingly adopted by both amateur and professional
communities, significantly lowering the barrier to entry for creating convincing
deepfakes ]10[.
The accessibility of deepfake creation has been further enhanced by the proliferation
of open-source tools and readily available datasets. Software packages like Roop-
unleashed, LivePortrait, DeepFaceLab[4], FakeApp, etc. provide user-friendly
interfaces and pre-trained models, enabling individuals with limited technical skills
to generate realistic deepfakes. Tables 1 through 3 fully detail the deepfake
generation tools examined in this paper. Publicly accessible datasets, such as
CelebA-HQ, FFHQ, VoxCeleb, etc., provide large quantities of high-quality data for
training and fine-tuning these models. This ease of access has fueled the rapid spread
of deepfakes across various platforms and applications. Early deepfake methods
largely focused on facial manipulation, particularly face swapping, which involves
transferring a source face onto a target face while preserving the target's expressions
and movements. However, the scope of deepfake technology has expanded
significantly. Audio deepfakes, achieved through techniques such as Seed-VC,
KNN-VC, HierSpeechpp, WaveNet, Tacotron, etc., pose a significant threat. These
methods can generate highly realistic synthetic speech, enabling impersonation,
voice cloning, and the creation of convincing audio recordings that never actually
occurred. The challenges in detecting audio deepfakes are often different from those
in visual deepfakes, requiring specialized techniques that analyze acoustic features
and subtle nuances in speech patterns. Furthermore, deepfake generation is evolving
beyond images and audio. Researchers are exploring the creation of synthetic videos
with realistic body movements and interactions, expanding into other modalities like
text and even video games. The rapid pace of innovation in deepfake generation
necessitates a constant evolution in detection techniques, and this ongoing "arms
race" between generation and detection is driving advancements in both fields. This
review aims to comprehensively examine these diverse approaches and challenges,
considering both the technical underpinnings and the broader societal impact of this
rapidly evolving technology.

4. Material and Methods

Deepfakes primarily utilize deep neural networks to manipulate video, image, audio,
and text content ]7[. Deep learning techniques such as autoencoders, GANs, and
CNNs play a crucial role in deepfake creation, enabling the generation of highly
realistic synthetic media. Understanding these technologies is vital for developing
effective detection strategies to combat associated risks. In the following section, we
will introduce some important deep neural network architectures.
4.1. Artificial Neural Networks
Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) are computational algorithms designed to mimic
the function of the human brain. Inspired by the structure and function of neurons,
these networks are primarily developed for tasks involving learning from data.
ANNs consist of three main layers: an input layer, hidden layers, and an output layer
]11[. The input layer feeds data into the system, while the hidden layers process and
extract features from the data. The output layer provides predictions or
classifications. The operation of ANNs is divided into two stages: feedforward and
backpropagation. In the feedforward stage, data is passed from input to output, and
in the backpropagation stage, the weights of the connections between neurons are
updated to minimize error ]12[. Neural networks are widely used in applications
such as image recognition, natural language processing, and financial prediction, and
due to their high capacity for learning from complex data, they have become one of
the most important tools in machine learning.
4.2. Deep learning
Deep learning is a subfield of machine learning that focuses on algorithms inspired
by the structure and function of the brain, particularly artificial neural networks. In
recent years, it has gained significant traction due to its remarkable ability to process
large amounts of data and perform complex tasks across various domains. Deep
learning uses neural networks with multiple layers (hence the term "deep") to model
complex patterns in data ]13[. Unlike traditional machine learning methods that
often require manual feature extraction, deep learning automatically discovers
representations from raw data and is particularly effective for tasks such as image
and speech recognition, natural language processing, and more.
This scientific field has seen rapid advancements, especially in generative models
capable of producing high-quality synthetic data. For instance, deep learning models
can generate realistic images from text descriptions or produce human-like speech.
Advances in deep learning have not only enhanced existing technologies but have
also opened up new avenues for research and application across various scientific
disciplines. Some common architectures of deep learning networks include fully
connected networks, deep belief networks, recurrent neural networks, convolutional
neural networks, generative adversarial networks, transformers, and neural radiance
fields. These architectures have been applied in fields including computer vision,
speech recognition, natural language processing, machine translation,
bioinformatics, drug design, medical image analysis, climate science, materials
inspection, and board game applications, where they have produced results
comparable to and, in some cases, surpassing the performance of human experts
]14[.

4.3. Convolutional Neural Networks

Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) are a specialized type of deep learning
architecture primarily used for analyzing visual data. They have become a
cornerstone of modern computer vision, enabling applications such as image
classification, object detection, and segmentation. A CNN is a feedforward neural
network that processes data using a grid-like topology, typically applied to images.
CNNs consist of multiple layers, including convolutional layers, pooling layers, and
fully connected layers. Each layer plays a crucial role in feature extraction and
transformation, allowing the network to learn hierarchical representations of the
input data. CNNs utilize the backpropagation algorithm to optimize filter weights
during training, enabling them to effectively learn from labeled datasets. This
capability of automatic feature extraction distinguishes CNNs from traditional
machine learning methods, which often require manual feature engineering. The
architecture is designed to handle variations in input data through mechanisms such
as weight sharing and local connectivity, enhancing translational invariance—
meaning features are detectable regardless of their position within the image. The
concept of CNNs was introduced by Yann LeCun in 1988 with his LeNet
architecture, designed for character recognition tasks. Since then, CNNs have
evolved significantly and are now foundational in deep learning applications across
various domains ]15[. However, the lineage of this neural network type can be traced
back to the architecture introduced by Kunihiko Fukushima in 1979, which also
introduced max-pooling, a now popular down sampling method ]16[. The Time
Delay Neural Network (TDNN), introduced by Alex Waibel in 1987, applied CNNs
to phoneme recognition, utilizing convolution, weight sharing, and backpropagation
]17[. In summary, convolutional neural networks represent a powerful approach to
understanding visual data through automatic feature extraction and hierarchical
learning.
4.4. Recurrent Neural Networks
Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) are a specialized class of artificial neural
networks designed for processing sequential data, making them particularly effective
for tasks where contextual and temporal dependencies are crucial. One origin of
RNNs lies in statistical mechanics. In 1972, Shunichi Amari proposed a statistical
method to modify the Ising model's weights via Hebbian learning as a model of
associative memory, adding a learning component. This work was popularized as
the Hopfield network by John Hopfield (1982) ]18[. Further developed in the 1980s
by researchers such as David Rumelhart, Geoffrey Hinton, and Ronald J. Williams,
RNNs have significantly impacted fields like Natural Language Processing (NLP),
speech recognition, and time series analysis. Unlike traditional feedforward neural
networks that process inputs and outputs independently, RNNs maintain a hidden
state that acts as a memory of previous inputs. This hidden state is updated at each
time step based on the current input and the previous hidden state, allowing RNNs
to capture dependencies over time. This feedback loop enables RNNs to make
predictions dependent on prior context, making them suitable for tasks such as
predicting the next word in a sentence or analyzing time series data.
The architecture of RNNs comprises interconnected neurons organized into input,
output, and hidden layers. The hidden layer processes sequential data step-by-step
while retaining information from previous steps through its recurrent connections.
This design allows RNNs to efficiently handle variable-length input sequences.
RNNs are trained using a method called Backpropagation Through Time (BPTT),
which extends the traditional backpropagation algorithm to account for the temporal
nature of the data. BPTT computes gradients at each time step and adjusts network
weights accordingly, facilitating learning in sequences. RNNs can be categorized
into various types based on their architecture and application:

• Simple RNNs: The simplest form of RNN, suffering from limitations such as
the vanishing gradient problem.
• Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM): A more advanced variant designed to
overcome the vanishing gradient problem by introducing memory cells
capable of storing information over longer periods.
• Gated Recurrent Units (GRUs): A simplified version of LSTMs that combines
the forget and input gates into a single update gate ]19[.
 • Bidirectional RNNs: These networks process data in both forward and
backward directions, improving contextual understanding by considering
future inputs alongside past inputs.

In summary, RNNs represent a significant advancement in neural network

architectures, particularly for sequential data processing. Their ability to retain
information over time makes them essential for many modern AI applications,
although they are increasingly being complemented or replaced by transformer-
based models in specific domains due to efficiency considerations.
4.5. Autoencoders
Autoencoders are a type of artificial neural network designed to learn efficient
representations of input data without requiring labeled outputs. The architecture
typically consists of three main components: an encoder, a bottleneck (or latent
space), and a decoder. The encoder reduces the dimensionality of the input data by
mapping it to a lower-dimensional latent space representation, capturing essential
features while discarding less relevant information. The bottleneck is a layer
containing the compressed representation of the input data; this layer acts as a
constraint, forcing the model to learn a more compact representation. The decoder
attempts to reconstruct the original input from the latent representation, aiming to
minimize the reconstruction error, often measured using loss functions such as Mean
Squared Error (MSE) or binary cross-entropy.
Several variations of autoencoders exist, each aiming to leverage learned features
for desirable properties. Examples include regularized autoencoders (sparse,
denoising, and contractive autoencoders), which are effective in learning
representations for subsequent classification tasks, and variational autoencoders,
which can be used as generative models. Autoencoders find applications in
numerous problems, including face recognition, feature extraction, anomaly
detection, and word embedding learning. In terms of data synthesis, autoencoders
can also be used to generate new data samples similar to the (training) input data.
4.6. Variational Autoencoders
Variational Autoencoders (VAEs) are a class of deep generative models that have
garnered significant attention in the machine learning field due to their ability to
learn complex data distributions and generate novel data samples. Similar to
standard autoencoders, VAEs aim to learn a compressed representation of the input
data in a latent space. However, VAEs impose a prior distribution (often a simple
Gaussian) on the latent space, encouraging nearby points in the latent space to
generate similar data points in the input space. This allows the encoder to generate
multiple new data points from a single input, all sampled from the learned
distribution. VAEs are designed to learn a probabilistic representation of the input
data through the latent space. The primary goal is to encode high-dimensional input
data into a lower-dimensional latent space while preserving the essential
characteristics of the original data. This is achieved through two main components:
an encoder and a decoder. The encoder maps the input data to a distribution in the
latent space, typically assumed to be Gaussian. The output consists of parameters
(mean and variance) defining this distribution. The decoder reconstructs the original
data from samples drawn from the latent representation, effectively generating new
data points.
Training Variational Autoencoders involves maximizing a variational lower bound
on the log-likelihood of the observed data. This is achieved using variational
inference techniques, which allow for efficient approximation of the posterior
distribution of the latent variables given the observed data. The loss function consists
of two terms:
• Reconstruction Loss: Measures how well the decoder can reconstruct the
original input from the latent representation.
• KL Divergence Loss: Regularizes the learned distribution to be close to the
prior distribution (typically a standard normal distribution), ensuring
smoothness of the latent space.
4.7. Transformers
The Transformer architecture is a groundbreaking deep learning model introduced
in the seminal paper "Attention is All You Need" by Vaswani et al. in 2017. It
revolutionized the field of Natural Language Processing (NLP) and has since been
adapted for various applications, including image processing and reinforcement
learning. The Transformer model is fundamentally based on an encoder-decoder
structure, allowing it to efficiently perform sequence-to-sequence tasks. Unlike
traditional models relying on Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) or Convolutional
Neural Networks (CNNs), Transformers utilize a mechanism called self-attention
for parallel processing of input data, significantly improving computational
efficiency and performance on long-range dependencies. Input text is first tokenized
into smaller units, which are then converted into numerical vectors via an embedding
layer. These embeddings are augmented with positional encodings to preserve the
order of tokens, as the model itself does not inherently understand sequence order.
The encoder consists of multiple identical layers (typically six). Each layer contains
two main components: multi-head self-attention: This mechanism allows each token
to consider other tokens in the sequence, capturing contextual relationships; and a
feed-forward network: A fully connected network that processes the output of the
self-attention layer by applying non-linear transformations.
The decoder section also comprises multiple layers but incorporates additional
mechanisms: masked multi-head self-attention: This prevents the decoder from
attending to future tokens during training, ensuring predictions are based solely on
past tokens; and a cross-attention layer: This allows the decoder to focus on relevant
parts of the encoder output while generating its own output sequence. The final
output from the decoder passes through a linear layer and SoftMax function,
converting it into a probability distribution over possible tokens, facilitating tasks
such as translation or text generation. The advantages of Transformers are discussed
below.
• Parallelization: Unlike RNNs which process sequences sequentially,
Transformers can process all tokens concurrently, making more efficient use
of modern hardware capabilities such as GPUs.
• Scalability: The architecture scales well with increasing data and model size,
enabling training on massive datasets.
• Long-Range Dependencies: The self-attention mechanism allows the
algorithm to capture relationships between distant tokens in a sequence,
crucial for understanding context in language tasks.
Transformers have been successfully applied across diverse fields, including:
• Natural Language Processing: Used in machine translation, text
summarization, sentiment analysis, and conversational agents.
• Computer Vision: Adapted for image classification and object detection tasks.
• Reinforcement Learning: Employed in models requiring sequential decision-
making.
 4.8. Generative Adversarial Networks
Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) represent a significant advancement in
machine learning, particularly in the field of generative modeling. Introduced by Ian
Goodfellow et al. in 2014, GANs consist of two neural networks—a generator and
a discriminator—engaged in a zero-sum game, where the success of one network
comes at the expense of the other. As shown in Figure 1 the generator network is
responsible for creating new data samples that mimic the training data. It takes
random noise as input and transforms it into data samples, aiming to produce outputs
indistinguishable from real data. The discriminator network evaluates the
authenticity of the data samples it receives, distinguishing between real data from
the training set and fake data generated by the generator. Its goal is to maximize its
accuracy in identifying real versus generated samples.

Figure 1 Demonstration The structure and training methods of GANs

The training process involves iteratively improving both networks: as the generator
learns to produce more realistic outputs, the discriminator becomes better at
detecting forgeries. This adversarial training continues until the discriminator can no
longer reliably distinguish between real and generated data, ideally reaching a state
where it is fooled approximately half the time. A key advantage of GANs over
autoencoders lies in their broader scope for generating novel data ]7[. GANs have
been applied in various fields, some of which are described below. These include
image generation, where GANs can create photorealistic images that do not
correspond to any real person or object; image-to-image translation, used for tasks
such as converting images from one style to another (e.g., summer landscapes to
winter scenes); and text-to-image synthesis, where GANs can generate images based
on textual descriptions, bridging natural language processing and computer vision.
4.9. Diffusion Models
The development of related fundamental technologies has gradually shifted from
GANs to multi-step diffusion models, offering higher-quality generation
capabilities. Generated content has also transitioned from single-frame images to
video modeling ]3[. Diffusion generative models represent a significant
advancement in generative machine learning, providing a robust framework for
generating high-quality data across modalities including images, audio, and text.
They operate by simulating a two-step process: adding noise to a dataset and then
learning to reverse this process to reconstruct the original data distribution. A
diffusion model consists of three main components: a forward process, a reverse
process, and a sampling method. The goal of diffusion models is to learn the
diffusion process for a given dataset, such that this process can generate novel items
similarly distributed to the original dataset.
The model responsible for noise removal is often referred to as its backbone. The
backbone can be of various types, but they are commonly U-net or Transformer
architectures. Diffusion models are predominantly used for computer vision tasks,
including image denoising, inpainting, super-resolution, image generation, and
video generation. These typically involve training a neural network to sequentially
remove noise from progressively noisier images corrupted with Gaussian noise. The
model is trained to reverse the process of adding noise to an image. After
convergence during training, generation can be achieved by starting with an image
composed of random noise and iteratively applying the network to denoise the
image. Beyond computer vision, diffusion generative models have found
applications in natural language processing (e.g., text generation and
summarization), audio generation, and reinforcement learning. Diffusion models are
inspired by the physical process of diffusion, where particles move from high-
concentration regions to low-concentration regions. In machine learning, this
concept is adapted to generate new data by systematically introducing noise into a
dataset and subsequently reversing this process to recover or create new samples that
resemble the original data distribution. The operation of diffusion models can be
divided into two main phases:
 • The forward diffusion process: This stage involves progressively adding
Gaussian noise to the data. The model starts with a simple distribution and
gradually complexifies it through a series of transformations, capturing
intricate patterns within the data.
• The reverse diffusion process: After the data has been sufficiently corrupted
with noise, the model learns to reverse this process. This stage involves
training a neural network to progressively remove the noise from the data,
effectively reconstructing the original distribution or generating new samples.
Diffusion models, due to their ability to generate high-quality outputs, have found
applications in various fields, including: Image generation: Notable examples
include DALL-E 2 and Stable Diffusion, which generate photorealistic images from
textual descriptions. Audio synthesis: They are also employed in generating high-
quality audio samples. Medical imaging: This technology is being explored for
enhancing medical imaging techniques and diagnostics.

5. Deepfake Categories
Deepfake generation can be broadly categorized into four main research areas: 1)
Face swapping: dedicated to implementing identity exchange between two
individuals' images; 2) Face reenactment: emphasizing the transfer of source
movements and gestures; 3) Talking face generation: focusing on achieving natural
mouth movement synchronization with textual content in character generation; and
4) Face attribute editing: aiming to modify specific facial features of the target
image. Figure 2 provides a structured overview of deepfake types and their
subcategories.
 Figure 2 Deepfake categories

Manipulated or fabricated content can take many forms, each presenting unique
challenges and posing varying risks to individuals and organizations. Different
deepfakes generate manipulated content using diverse approaches. Deepfake content
can be categorized as image, video, and audio deepfakes. Although image and video
deepfakes might be considered synonymous, as video content is essentially a
sequence of images, this paper examines manipulation of video, image, and audio
content for applications such as face swapping, speaker transformation, facial
expression changes, lip synchronization, and facial feature editing, each of which
will be detailed separately ]7 ,1[.
5.1. Face Swapping
Face swapping technology, a prominent subset of deepfake generation, involves
manipulating video content to replace one person's face with another, effectively
allowing the primary subject to assume a different identity. This technique employs
advanced machine learning algorithms, particularly deep learning frameworks, to
achieve photorealistic results. Generally, deepfake facial manipulations can be
categorized into four main groups:
• Face generation, encompassing the creation of entirely novel facial images;
• Face attribute modification, such as altering hair color, age, gender, glasses,
etc.;
 • Face swapping, involving the replacement of the original person's face with
another's;
• Face reenactment (sometimes referred to as expression transfer), where the
original person's facial expression is transferred to a target individual.
Deepfakes can pose varying levels of risk. Among the four deepfake facial
manipulations listed, face swapping and face reenactment present a significant threat
to society ]10[. Face swapping methods can replace the face in a reference image
with the same shape and features of an input face. Deep learning methods are used
to extract facial features from the input face and then transfer them to the generated
face. A face in a video file may be replaced by another person while retaining the
original scene content and preserving the original facial expressions ]20[. Face
swapping technology exemplifies the double-edged nature of deepfake
advancements. It offers potential for innovative creative applications while
simultaneously posing risks to social norms surrounding trust and authenticity. As
this technology continues to evolve, ongoing research into detection methods and
ethical guidelines will be crucial in mitigating potential harms. This section will
examine face swapping methods, which can be broadly categorized into four
approaches:
5.1.1. Traditional Graphics
Traditional face swapping remains a vital skill in graphic design and photography,
offering unique advantages in customization and control. However, advancements
in technology are reshaping how we approach this art form, introducing AI-powered
methods that enhance creativity while streamlining workflows. Understanding both
approaches allows for a more comprehensive grasp of digital image manipulation
techniques, catering to diverse needs in artistic expression and professional
applications. As representatives of early implementations, traditional graphic-based
methods can be categorized into two approaches:

• Key point Matching and Blending: Some methods rely on matching and
blending vital information to replace corresponding regions by aligning key
points in the target facial areas—such as eyes, nose, and mouth—between
source and target images. Subsequent steps, such as boundary blending and
lighting adjustments, are then performed to produce the resulting image.

• 3D Model Construction for Face Parameterization: Methods based on 3D

model construction and the introduction of a facial parameter model often
involve building a facial parameter model using 3DMM technology based on
 a pre-collected face database. After matching the source image's facial
information with the structured face model, specific modifications are made
to the parameters of the facial parameter model to generate a completely new
face.

5.1.2. Variational Autoencoders

Variational Autoencoders (VAEs) are increasingly utilized in deepfake technology,
particularly for face swapping—the process of replacing a person's face in a video
or image with another. VAEs play a crucial role in enhancing the realism and quality
of these manipulations. Introduced in 2013, VAEs revolutionized autoencoders by
altering the relationship between latent features and linear mapping within latent
spaces. This involves introducing feature distributions, such as Gaussian
distributions, enabling the generation of novel entities through interpolation.
Therefore, VAEs are generative models that learn to encode input data into a latent
space and then decode it to reconstruct the original data. This allows them to generate
new data points similar to the training dataset. In face swapping, VAEs effectively
capture complex facial image features, facilitating more realistic swaps. To generate
deepfakes using this method, two distinct VAEs are trained—one for each face.
Figure 3 illustrates the operation of a VAE; both network architectures share the
same encoder but employ different decoders. These two VAEs are then used to swap
face A with face B.
To swap face A with face B, face A's image is compressed using the encoder trained
on face A, and face B's decoder is then used to reconstruct the image. For generating
deepfake videos, this face replacement must be performed frame-by-frame ]2[.
Various deepfake technologies, such as that described in ]4[, employ this technique.
 Figure 3 The architecture and operation of Variational Autoencoders (VAEs) in training and testing phases.

5.1.3. Generative Adversarial Networks

Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) are increasingly employed in face
swapping, particularly in creating deepfakes. This technology leverages the
capabilities of GANs to generate realistic images by training two neural networks—
a generator and a discriminator—against each other. The application of GANs to
face swapping involves several key stages: face detection, alignment of pose and
facial expression, and face blending. Figure 4 illustrates this face-swapping process.
The goal of GAN-based methods is to obtain realistic generated images through
adversarial training between the generator and discriminator network, forming the
core approach to face swapping. Early GAN-based methods addressed issues related
to pose and lighting consistency between source and target images. Depth Nets, a
combination of GANs and 3DMM, are designed to map the source face onto any
target geometry, not being limited to the target template's geometry. This makes it
less susceptible to pose differences between source and target faces. However, they
face challenges in generalizing the trained model to unseen faces. Significant effort
has been dedicated to addressing this generalization limitation.
Recent advancements include a fine-grained editing approach termed "Edit for
Swap" (E4S). This method explicitly disentangles facial shape and texture, allowing
for finer control over which features are exchanged. Using component masks, this
framework effectively handles occluded regions, enhancing identity preservation
during the swap ]21[. Regional Generative Inversion (RGI) is another technique
operating in a latent space derived from StyleGAN, enabling fine-grained
manipulation of facial features by replacing local shape and texture components
between faces. This facilitates high-fidelity swapping that maintains realism even in
complex facial poses. Another novel approach involves utilizing a ShapeEditor
encoder that disentangles identity and attribute information from faces. This encoder
generates encoding vectors representing these attributes, which are then used to more
precisely control a StyleGAN generator. This two-stage process increases the
resolution and fidelity of generated images ]22[.
Generalization Capability:
A deepfake network might be trained or designed to operate with only a specific set
of target and source identities. Achieving an unbiased model is sometimes
challenging due to correlations learned during training between target and source
identities. To assess substitution or regeneration capabilities, we consider three main
categories of generalization power:

• One-to-one: A model using one specific identity to drive another specific

identity.
• Many-to-one: A model using any identity to drive one specific identity.
• Many-to-many: A model using any identity to drive any other identity ]23[.

5.1.4. Diffusion Models

Diffusion models have emerged as powerful tools in generative AI, particularly for
creating deepfakes, including face-swapping applications. These models operate by
progressively corrupting training data with noise and then learning to reconstruct the
original data through a reverse process. This capability allows them to generate
highly realistic images from text prompts or existing images. Recent advancements
have specifically adapted diffusion models for deepfake generation, enhancing their
ability to create believable visual content consistent with context. For instance,
modifications to established models like Stable Diffusion enable the generation of
high-quality deepfakes ]24[.
In face-swapping applications, diffusion models employ a combination of
techniques to ensure high quality and realism. A typical framework may incorporate
components such as image feature encoding, conditional generation, and inpainting
for seamless replacement of facial features while preserving surrounding texture.
Using advanced face-guided optimization methods, these models can maintain
identity consistency in swapped faces. Some techniques further refine the output by
training on specific features associated with the target identity, resulting in a more
coherent and realistic final image. The integration of these methodologies highlights
the sophisticated nature of modern deepfake creation, where even subtle details can
be manipulated to achieve a high degree of realism. The proliferation of generative
models for deepfake creation presents significant challenges, particularly regarding
detection. The increasing realism and diversity of content generated by these models
complicate the identification of manipulated media, forcing existing detection
systems to adapt effectively. Research indicates that traditional detection methods
often struggle with the intricate nature of deepfakes produced by diffusion models,
which can differ significantly from previously encountered manipulations. In
response, efforts are underway to enhance detection capabilities through improved
training data diversity and innovative strategies that account for the unique
characteristics of diffusion-generated content. This ongoing arms race between
generation and detection highlights the critical need for robust solutions to mitigate
the risks associated with deepfake technology.
Table 1- Detailed description of the tools reviewed for creating image and video deepfakes.
Release
Toolkit Date Repository Doc Performance Written in Stars Collection
roop-unleashed 2023 GitHub DOC ★★★★★ Python 1.6 faceswap
LivePortrait reenactment,
LivePortrait 2024 GitHub (hf demo) ★★★★★ Python 11.7 video-editing,
Audio-Driven
Portrait
Animations, lip-
AniTalker 2024 GitHub hf demo ★★★★★ Python 1.3 sync
Wav2Lip 2021 GitHub ★★★★☆ Python 9.9 lip-sync
Jun 25, README
Roop 2023 GitHub file ★★★★☆ Python 25 faceswap
real time
deepfake, video-
Deep-Live-Cam 2023 GitHub ★★★☆☆ Python 39 deepfake
Audio-Driven
Portrait
V-Express 2024 GitHub project page ★★★☆☆ Python 2.1 Animations
Audio-Driven
Portrait
DreamTalk 2024 GitHub ★★★☆☆ Python 1.5 Animations
Audio-Driven
Portrait
EchoMimic 2024 GitHub hf demo ★★★☆☆ Python 2 Animations
Audio-Driven
Portrait
AniPortrait 2024 GitHub hf demo ★★★☆☆ Python 4.4 Animations
image-animation,
SadTalker 2023 GitHub hf demo ★★★☆☆ Python 11.4 talking-head
Talking Head
Video Editing,
video-retalking 2023 GitHub ★★★☆☆ Python 6.2 lip sync
20 Aug
facefusion 2023 GitHub DOC ★★☆☆☆ Python 8.6 faceswap
tts demo on Audio-Driven
hallo 2024 GitHub hf ★★☆☆☆ Python 8 Visual Synthesis
 editable talking
StyleHEAT 2022 GitHub ★★☆☆☆ Python 0.6 face generation
HyperReenact 2023 GitHub ★★☆☆☆ Python Reenactment
Thin-Plate-Spline-
Motion-Model 2022 GitHub hf demo ★☆☆☆☆ Python 3.4 face-reenactment
Talking Head
styletalk 2023 GitHub ★☆☆☆☆ Python 0.5 Generation
headswap-
machine 2021 GitHub ★☆☆☆☆ Python headswap
June 11 Faceswap, image
SimSwap 2021 GitHub DOC ☆☆☆☆☆ Python 3.6 manipulation
ReliableSwap 2023 GitHub DOC ☆☆☆☆☆ Python faceswap
Wav2Lip-
GFPGAN 2021 GitHub ☆☆☆☆☆ Python lip-sync, wav2lip
inswapper 2023 GitHub ☆☆☆☆☆ Python faceswap
README Python/Jupyter Faceswap, image
faceswap-GAN 2018 GitHub file ☆☆☆☆☆ Notebook 3.3 manipulation
fewshot-face- README Python/Jupyter Faceswap, image
translation-GAN 2019 GitHub file ☆☆☆☆☆ Notebook 0.7 translation
README
dfaker 2017 GitHub file ☆☆☆☆☆ Python 0.4 faceswap
speech-driven- Speech-Driven
animation 2020 GitHub ☆☆☆☆☆ Python 0.9 Animation
SadTalker-Video-
Lip-Sync 2023 GitHub ☆☆☆☆☆ Python 1.8 lip-sync
Moore- Face
AnimateAnyone 2024 GitHub hf demo ☆☆☆☆☆ Python 3 Reenactment
portrait
facechain 2024 GitHub ☆☆☆☆☆ Python 8.8 generation

5.2. Reenactment
Facial expression transfer, or face reenactment, is a sophisticated technique in the
realm of deepfakes that refers to the process of transferring facial expressions and
movements from one person (the driver) onto the face of another (the driven) while
preserving the original identity ]10 ,3[. This method allows for the seamless and
realistic portrayal of emotions and expressions, distinguishing it from other deepfake
techniques such as face swapping, where one person's face is entirely replaced with
another's. This technology utilizes advanced machine learning algorithms,
specifically Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) and Variational
Autoencoders (VAEs), to achieve high fidelity in the reenacted facial features,
resulting in a convincing illusion of expression transfer.
The beneficial applications of face reenactment are diverse, spanning entertainment,
advertising, and even political contexts. For example, it can be used in film
production to create expressive characters or dub foreign films with accurate lip
synchronization. Furthermore, it has implications for virtual reality and gaming,
where realistic avatars can mimic human emotions in real-time. However, these
advancements also raise significant ethical concerns regarding misinformation and
identity theft, as the technology may be misused to create misleading or harmful
content. The ability to convincingly manipulate visual media presents challenges to
authenticity in digital communication. Unlike face swapping techniques, facial
expression transfer techniques are rarely considered in readily available datasets.
Reference ]9[ is a significant and commonly used resource for facial expression
transfer, employed in numerous works. In this work, facial landmarks are first
extracted using 3D detectors to provide representative images for the source and
target faces. Then, low-dimensional representations of parameters such as pose and
expression from the source, and style information from the target video, are extracted
using an encoder network. Research on face reenactment continues to evolve,
focusing on improving the quality and efficiency of these techniques while
addressing their ethical implications. Recent studies emphasize the importance of
identity preservation throughout the reenactment process, as unwanted leakage of
identity information from the driver video can compromise the integrity of the
output.
5.3. Lip sync
Deepfake lip synchronization represents a sophisticated application of artificial
intelligence in the manipulation of digital media. These deepfakes involve altering
a person's lip movements to match a new or modified audio track, creating the
illusion that they are speaking words they did not originally utter. This technology
is particularly concerning because it focuses on a localized area—the mouth—
making inconsistencies harder to detect compared to full-face manipulations. Recent
advancements have highlighted the challenges associated with identifying this type
of deepfake, as they can often appear more convincing than traditional face-
swapping techniques due to the localized nature and subtleties involved in lip
synchronization. Deepfake audio tools possess the capability to generate highly
realistic lip-synchronized videos where audio features are manipulated and aligned
with video frames ]7[.
Generally, lip synchronization can be considered a temporal mapping aiming to
generate a talking video where the target image's character speaks based on an
arbitrary motion source, such as text, audio, video, or a combination of multimedia
sources. The lip movements, facial expressions, emotions, and speech content of the
generated video's character match the target information ]3[. Recent research has
focused on developing methods to identify these deceptive videos by analyzing
inconsistencies between audio and visual components. A notable approach is the
LIP-INCONS model, which detects temporal inconsistencies in mouth movements
across frames ]25[. This model captures both local and global mouth features to
assess whether lip movements align with the spoken words. By examining these
discrepancies, researchers have significantly improved detection accuracy,
outperforming existing techniques on various benchmark datasets. The effectiveness
of such methods is crucial given the increasing prevalence of lip-synchronized
deepfakes across various media.
5.4. Face Attribute Editing
Facial attribute manipulation in the context of deepfakes refers to the process of
altering specific facial attributes using advanced deep learning techniques,
particularly Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs). This manipulation can
encompass changes in age, gender, ethnicity, and other characteristics such as skin
texture, hair color, and even emotional expressions. Such capabilities have become
increasingly accessible due to the proliferation of user-friendly applications like
FaceApp and similar tools, enabling even non-experts to create realistic alterations
in facial images and videos. Existing methods encompass both single-attribute and
comprehensive editing: the former focuses on training a model for a single attribute,
while the latter integrates multiple feature editing tasks simultaneously—the primary
focus of this review ]3[.
The technological underpinnings of facial feature manipulation involve
sophisticated algorithms capable of blending or altering facial features while
maintaining a high degree of realism. For example, feature manipulation techniques
often utilize conditional GANs that enable targeted alterations based on user-defined
attributes. This process involves an encoder that captures the principal features of
the face and a GAN that generates the modified output. The result is a highly
convincing image or video where specific features have been altered without losing
the overall coherence of the subject's appearance. This capability raises concerns
regarding the integrity of biometric systems and automated recognition technologies,
which may struggle to accurately identify manipulated faces. Automated facial
recognition systems exhibit significant vulnerabilities when confronted with
manipulated images. Studies have shown that error rates can dramatically increase
under various forms of manipulation. For instance, manipulations such as digital
reshaping or beautification can, in some cases, lead to identification failures of up to
95%. Consequently, ongoing research focuses on developing robust detection
methods capable of effectively identifying manipulated content while also
addressing ethical concerns surrounding privacy and consent in the digital age. The
dual nature of these technologies—as both creative tools and potential instruments
of deception—highlights the need for comprehensive understanding and responsible
usage.
Table 2- Detailed description of the tools reviewed for Face Attribute Editing.

Release
Toolkit Date Repository Doc Performance Written in Stars Collection

Inpaint- Python/Jupyter
Anything 2023 GitHub ★★★★★ Notebook 4.7 Inpainting

lama-cleaner 2021 GitHub ★★★★★ Python 14 Inpainting

Aug 10, face-restoration, Face

CodeFormer 2022 GitHub DOC ★★★★★ Python 10.9 Inpainting

latent-diffusion 2022 GitHub ★★★★☆ Python 9.4 text2image - inpainting

ProPainter 2020 GitHub DOC ★★☆☆☆ Python 4.1 Video Inpainting

RePaint 2022 GitHub ★☆☆☆☆ Python 1.6 inpainting

Python/Jupyter
lama 2023 GitHub ★☆☆☆☆ Notebook 6.7 Inpainting

5.5. Voice Conversion

Artificial speech generation can be broadly categorized into two types: text-to-
speech (TTS) and voice conversion (VC). In TTS, the AI model receives text data
as input and generates the corresponding synthetic speech. VC, however, allows
users to transform one person's voice into another's. In TTS, all generative audio
models, at their most basic level, utilize an encoder-decoder-like concept. Thus, in
the first stage, the encoder must encode text features into acoustic and prosodic
features. Then, in the second stage, it must decode these features and generate the
speech waveform. Consequently, GAN-based approaches align well with the
discussion of audio generation. Modified versions of CycleGAN and StarGAN have
also been proposed for synthetic speech generation tasks ]7[. Voice conversion (VC)
is a technology enabling the transformation of one speaker's voice into another's
while preserving the original content. Two main approaches exist for achieving
voice conversion: parallel and non-parallel training, each possessing distinct
characteristics, advantages, and challenges. In parallel voice conversion, both the
source and target speakers read the same sentences during the data collection phase.
This relies on a parallel corpus, meaning that for every utterance produced by the
source speaker, there is a corresponding utterance by the target speaker. This
alignment facilitates accurate feature extraction and mapping between voices,
leading to higher-quality synthesized speech. However, collecting sufficient parallel
data can be challenging, as both speakers must produce identical speech content,
often impractical in real-world scenarios ]26[.
Conversely, non-parallel voice conversion does not require the source and target
speakers to read identical sentences. Instead, it utilizes a diverse collection of
utterances from both speakers that may not be directly aligned. This approach is
particularly beneficial when parallel data is scarce or unavailable. Non-parallel
methods allow for greater flexibility in training data collection, as it does not
necessitate identical utterances from both speakers. This can be applied in various
contexts where parallel data acquisition is infeasible, such as multilingual scenarios
or those with limited speech samples. However, the lack of direct alignment can
lead to reduced quality in the synthesized speech, as the model may struggle to
accurately map features between mismatched utterances. Non-parallel methods
often require more sophisticated algorithms and techniques to bridge the gap
between different speaking styles and patterns ]27[. Open-source resources available
on platforms such as GitHub were used to identify suitable and reliable sources, as
well as programming tools and code for implementing the methods. Table 2 presents
a list of all the relevant collected tools along with supplementary information.
Several key metrics are commonly used to evaluate voice conversion models. These
include:
• Multilingual capability: The ability to convert voices between different
languages.
• Low-resource learning: The ability to train effectively with limited source
data.
 • Quality: The assessment of output audio quality, primarily qualitative in
nature.
• Speed: Generally, less complex models exhibit faster processing speeds.
• Extensibility: The ease with which the software can be further developed.
• Up-to-dateness: The model's use of the latest advancements in the field.
The ordering in Table 1 reflects the results of our evaluations, comparing model
outputs and considering the aforementioned metrics. The model presented by tool
number one in Table 1 is based on a k-nearest neighbor algorithm and the extraction
of fundamental acoustic signal features ]28[. This method first extracts the reference
and target audio signals using a pre-trained reference tool ]29[. Then, each frame of
the reference audio feature vector is replaced with its nearest neighbor in the target
audio feature vectors. Finally, a pre-trained generative audio model ]30[ produces
the target audio signal from the modified feature vectors. A key advantage is its
text-independence. Some voice conversion models utilize text from the source audio
transcript in the bottleneck layer, but this adds computational overhead and
eliminates useful information from the reference audio signal, such as speaker
intonation, pitch, identity, and timing. Recent work confirms that higher layers of
neural networks exhibit poorer representation of this information. Based on these
observations, it's determined that using a highly correlated layer (layer 6 in the
reference model ]30[) is crucial for good speaker similarity and preserving prosodic
information from the source audio signal. Therefore, features extracted from layer 6
were used for all experiments, producing one vector for every 20 milliseconds of 16
kHz audio.
Regarding training data volume, increasing the data size enhances the system's
ability to detect and transfer the target audio's acoustic features. Longer target audio
files generally improve output quality, although this improvement is limited; for files
exceeding 5 minutes, the difference becomes negligible. Conversely, training data
shorter than 30 seconds significantly reduces model performance ]28[. Using this
method, the audio generator produces higher-quality audio. This improvement stems
from the model's use of the mean of each frame's components during testing, creating
a form of alignment between training and testing. Due to its non-parametric nature,
the model demonstrates relatively good accuracy in converting different languages,
whispers, and even non-human sounds.
Table 3- Detailed description of the tools reviewed for Voice Conversion.

Release
Toolkit Date Repository Doc Performance Written in Stars Collection

voice conversion - singing voice

seed-vc 2024 GitHub ★★★★★ Python conversion

knn-vc 2023 GitHub DOC ★★★★☆ Python 0.4 Voice Cloning - Voice Conversion

text-to-speech (TTS), voice

HierSpeechpp 2023 GitHub ★★★★☆ Python 1.2 conversion (VC)

metavoice-src 2024 GitHub ★★★★☆ Python 1.2 Zero-shot cloning

StyleTTS2 2023 GitHub DOC ★★★☆☆ Python 4.6 Text-to-Speech

bark-gui 2023 GitHub ★★★☆☆ Python generative-audio - TTS

Bark-Voice-Cloning 2023 GitHub ★★★☆☆ Python 1.8 Voice Conversion

FreeVC 2022 GitHub DOC ★★★☆☆ Python Voice Conversion

TriAAN-VC 2023 GitHub ★★☆☆☆ Python Voice Conversion

Real-Time-Voice-
Cloning 2019 GitHub DOC ★★☆☆☆ Python 52 voice cloning

so-vits-svc-fork 2023 GitHub ★★☆☆☆ Python 7.9 Voice Conversion

Mar 9,
coqui-ai/TTS 2021 GitHub DOC ★★☆☆☆ Python 33 Voice Cloning - Voice Conversion

ppg-vc 2020 GitHub ★★☆☆☆ Python Voice Conversion

QuickVC 2023 GitHub ★☆☆☆☆ Python Voice Conversion

ConsistencyVC-voive- cross-lingual voice conversion and

conversion 2023 GitHub ★☆☆☆☆ Python expressive voice conversion

lvc-vc 2023 GitHub ☆☆☆☆☆ Python Voice Conversion

StyleTTS-VC 2023 GitHub ☆☆☆☆☆ Python Voice Conversion

Nov 19,
YourTTS 2021 GitHub DOC ☆☆☆☆☆ Python Voice Conversion

6. Deepfake Detection
As deepfake technology continues to evolve, so do the challenges associated with
identifying these manipulations. The emergence of deepfake technology presents
significant ethical challenges, particularly concerning misinformation, identity theft,
and privacy violations. As the technology becomes more accessible, it is crucial for
researchers and developers to implement robust detection mechanisms alongside
generation techniques to mitigate potential misuse. Deepfake detection aims to
identify anomalies, manipulations, or forged regions in images or videos using
anomaly detection probabilities, holding high research and practical value in
information security and multimedia forensics ]3[.
Recent advancements in deepfake detection utilize deep learning architectures,
particularly Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Long Short-Term Memory
networks (LSTMs). These models analyze both spatial and temporal features in
video frames to identify inconsistencies indicative of manipulation. For example,
techniques such as optical flow analysis and temporal pattern recognition are
employed to detect anomalies in facial movements and background consistency
across frames. Research indicates that hybrid approaches combining CNNs with
LSTMs can achieve detection accuracy exceeding 95% on benchmark datasets like
FaceForensics++ and Celeb-DF, demonstrating effectiveness in identifying
deepfake content even in challenging scenarios. Deepfake detection methods can be
broadly categorized into two types: fake face detection and AI-Generated Content
(AIGC) detection, the latter encompassing a much wider scope. Fake face
manipulation can be localized, affecting only the facial region, while AIGC artifacts
can be global, encompassing the entire synthesized image content. Consequently,
most detection methods are applicable to only one of these problem types ]5[. The
following sections briefly introduce each of these methods.
6.1. Fake Face Detection
Initial deepfake detection techniques primarily relied on traditional digital image
processing methods. These approaches utilized inherent video characteristics such
as inconsistencies in lip synchronization and gaze, depth of field, color components,
and head poses. However, with the advent of deep learning, the focus has shifted
towards learning-based detectors due to their superior feature extraction capabilities
]5 [.
6.2. AI-Generated Content (AIGC) Detection
This encompasses a broader range of techniques aimed at identifying synthetic
content that may not be limited to facial manipulations. Unlike fake face detection,
which primarily focuses on discrepancies within facial features, AIGC detection
targets a wider spectrum of artifacts generated by various AI models, including text,
images, and videos. AIGC detection methods can be categorized into several
approaches, some of which are detailed below:
• Feature-Based Methods: These techniques analyze inherent content features.
This might involve examining statistical properties of the image or video, such
as pixel distribution, noise patterns, and compression artifacts. For instance,
Error Level Analysis (ELA) is a common method that highlights pixel
intensity differences to detect alterations in an image.

• Machine Learning Approaches: Traditional machine learning techniques

utilize handcrafted features for classification. However, these methods often
face challenges in generalizing to unseen data and are sensitive to variations
in input quality. Recent advancements have integrated more sophisticated
algorithms such as Support Vector Machines (SVMs) and K-Nearest
Neighbors (KNN) to improve classification accuracy.

• Deep Learning Techniques: The most promising advancements in AIGC

detection stem from deep learning methods. Convolutional Neural Networks
(CNNs) and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) are employed to
automatically extract complex features from data without manual
intervention. For example, CNNs can capture spatial hierarchies in images,
while RNNs can analyze temporal sequences in videos. Some models utilize
Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks to identify frame
inconsistencies in video content.

• Temporal Analysis: This approach focuses on the temporal coherence of

video frames. By analyzing frame sequences instead of individual images,
detection systems can identify unnatural movements or inconsistencies that
may indicate manipulation. Recent studies have shown that combining spatial
and temporal feature analysis significantly improves detection rates.
 • Hybrid Approaches: Some advanced systems combine multiple techniques to
improve robustness against diverse types of AIGC. These hybrid models may
integrate feature extraction methods with machine learning classifiers or
utilize ensemble learning techniques that leverage the strengths of different
algorithms.

Table 3 lists the key tools employed in this research. Most existing deepfake
detectors can be broadly categorized into three types: preliminary, spatial, and
frequency-based. The first type, preliminary detectors, utilize CNNs to perform
binary classification, distinguishing fake content from authentic data. Several CNN-
based binary classifiers have been proposed, such as MesoNet and Xception. The
second type, spatial detectors, place greater emphasis on representations such as the
location of the forged region, discriminative learning, image reconstruction,
inpainting, image blending, etc. Finally, the third type, frequency-based detectors,
address this limitation by focusing on the frequency domain for forgery detection
]5 [.
Table 4- Detailed description of the tools reviewed for Deepfake Detection.

Release
Toolkit Date Repository Doc Performance Written in Collection

videofact-wacv-2024 2024 GitHub ★★★★★ Python Video Forgeries Detection

ImageForensicsOSN 2022 GitHub ★★★★★ Python Image Forgeries Detection

deepfake-image-
detection 2024 (hf demo) ★★★★☆ Python Image Forgeries Detection

NPR-
DeepfakeDetection 2024 GitHub (hf demo) ★★★★☆ Python Image Forgeries Detection

Fake_Face_Detection 2024 (hf demo) ★★★☆☆ Python Fake Face Detection

CNNDetection 2020 GitHub ★★★☆☆ Python Image Forgeries Detection

Image Forgery Detection and

FOCAL 2023 GitHub ★★★☆☆ Python Localization

Video and Image Forgeries

SOFTX-D 2023 GitHub ★★★☆☆ Python Detection
SeqDeepFake 2022 GitHub ★★★☆☆ Python Video Forgeries Detection

audio-visual-forensics 2023 GitHub DOC ★★☆☆☆ Python Video Forgeries Detection

Audio-Visual and Face-Forgery

FACTOR 2023 GitHub ★☆☆☆☆ Python Detection

HiFi_IFDL 2023 GitHub ★☆☆☆☆ Python Image Forgery Detection

FTCN 2021 GitHub ★☆☆☆☆ Python Video Face Forgery Detection

RealForensics 2022 GitHub ☆☆☆☆☆ Python Face Forgeries Detection

ICT_DeepFake 2022 GitHub ☆☆☆☆☆ Python Face Forgeries Detection

Face-Liveness-
Detection-SDK 2023 HF DOC ☆☆☆☆☆ Python Face Forgeries Detection

VideoDeepFakeDetectio
n 2024 GitHub ☆☆☆☆☆ Python Video Forgeries Detection

MVSS-Net 2021 GitHub ☆☆☆☆☆ Python Image Manipulation Detection

7. Conclusions
This paper examines the generation and detection of deepfake audio and visual
content, focusing on modern deep learning technologies and related tools. The
emergence of deepfakes as a novel technology presents unprecedented challenges in
areas such as privacy, information security, and media credibility. However,
deepfake technology also offers potential benefits, capable of enhancing various
digital industries and providing innovative applications in entertainment, education,
and digital communication. This research reveals the dual nature of deepfakes:
while offering new possibilities in content creation, they also pose significant threats
to society, national security, and individual rights. This dual nature necessitates a
comprehensive approach to understanding its implications and developing effective
countermeasures. Therefore, the detection and identification of deepfakes are
crucial. The ease of access to deepfake creation tools, coupled with the increasing
sophistication of generation techniques, underscores the urgent need for robust and
readily deployable detection methods. Current detection strategies, while improving,
still face challenges in identifying increasingly realistic deepfakes, highlighting the
need for further research into more robust and generalizable detection algorithms.
The analyses presented in this paper, along with the review of various techniques,
aim to familiarize readers with the challenges and available tools in this field,
enabling them to understand both the potential positive and negative impacts of
deepfake technology. This paper first discusses current deep learning methods and
tools widely used to create deepfake images and videos. We then examine various
types of deepfakes, including face swapping, voice conversion, facial expression
manipulation, lip synchronization, and facial feature editing. Furthermore, we
provide a comprehensive overview of diverse technologies and their application in
deepfake detection. Based on the current state-of-the-art and prevalent trends, future
research should focus on several key areas:
• Advanced Detection Algorithms: The development of more sophisticated
algorithms capable of identifying deepfake content with higher accuracy is
crucial. This involves leveraging advancements in artificial intelligence and
machine learning to improve detection rates across various media formats.
• Exploration of novel features and techniques for deepfake detection beyond
current methods, potentially incorporating physiological signals or subtle
artifacts.
• Development of user-friendly and accessible deepfake detection tools for the
general public.
• Public Awareness and Education: Raising public awareness about deepfakes
is paramount. Educational initiatives should inform individuals about the
existence and implications of deepfakes and equip them with critical thinking
skills to discern authentic content from manipulated material.
• Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Future endeavors should involve
interdisciplinary collaboration—combining insights from computer science,
psychology, law, and ethics—to holistically address the multifaceted
challenges arising from deepfakes.
• Longitudinal Studies: Conducting longitudinal studies on the societal impacts
of deepfakes will provide valuable insights into their evolving role in media
consumption and public discourse.
By addressing these areas, researchers can contribute to a safer digital environment
that balances technological innovation with ethical considerations, ultimately
protecting individual rights and societal integrity against the backdrop of rapidly
advancing capabilities in deepfake technology.
References
[1] M. Taeb and H. Chi, "Comparison of deepfake detection techniques through deep learning,"
Journal of Cybersecurity and Privacy, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 89-106, 2022.
[2] T. T. Nguyen et al., "Deep learning for deepfakes creation and detection: A survey," Computer
Vision and Image Understanding, vol. 223, p. 103525, 2022.
[3] A. Naitali, M. Ridouani, F. Salahdine, and N. Kaabouch, "Deepfake attacks: Generation, detection,
datasets, challenges, and research directions," Computers, vol. 12, no. 10, p. 216, 2023.
[4] I. Perov et al., "DeepFaceLab: Integrated, flexible and extensible face-swapping framework," arXiv
preprint arXiv:2005.05535, 2020.
[5] G. Pei et al., "Deepfake generation and detection: A benchmark and survey," arXiv preprint
arXiv:2403.17881, 2024.
[6] P. L. Kharvi, "Understanding the Impact of AI-Generated Deepfakes on Public Opinion, Political
Discourse, and Personal Security in Social Media," IEEE Security & Privacy, 2024.
[7] A. Kaur, A. Noori Hoshyar, V. Saikrishna, S. Firmin, and F. Xia, "Deepfake video detection:
challenges and opportunities," Artificial Intelligence Review, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 1-47, 2024.
[8] R. Chen, X. Chen, B. Ni, and Y. Ge, "Simswap: An efficient framework for high fidelity face
swapping," in Proceedings of the 28th ACM international conference on multimedia, 2020, pp.
2003-2011.
[9] Y. Patel et al., "Deepfake generation and detection: Case study and challenges," IEEE Access, 2023.
[10] A. Vaswani, "Attention is all you need," Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2017.
[11] A. Brahme, Comprehensive biomedical physics. Newnes, 2014.
[12] C. M. Bishop, "Pattern recognition and machine learning," Springer google schola, vol. 2, pp. 1122-
1128, 2006.
[13] Y. LeCun, Y. Bengio, and G. Hinton, "Deep learning," nature, vol. 521, no. 7553, pp. 436-444, 2015.
[14] A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and G. E. Hinton, "Imagenet classification with deep convolutional
neural networks," Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 25, 2012.
[15] Y. LeCun et al., "Backpropagation applied to handwritten zip code recognition," Neural
computation, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 541-551, 1989.
[16] K. Fukushima, "Neural network model for a mechanism of pattern recognition unaffected by shift
in position-neocognitron," IEICE Technical Report, A, vol. 62, no. 10, pp. 658-665, 1979.
[17] W. Alexander, "Phoneme Recognition Using Time-Delay Neural Network," IEEE transactions on
acoustics, speech, and signal processing, 1989.
[18] J. J. Hopfield, "Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational
abilities," Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, vol. 79, no. 8, pp. 2554-2558, 1982.
[19] K. Cho, "On the properties of neural machine translation: Encoder-decoder approaches," arXiv
preprint arXiv:1409.1259, 2014.
[20] J. W. Seow, M. K. Lim, R. C. Phan, and J. K. Liu, "A comprehensive overview of Deepfake:
Generation, detection, datasets, and opportunities," Neurocomputing, vol. 513, pp. 351-371,
2022.
[21] Z. Liu et al., "Fine-grained face swapping via regional gan inversion," in Proceedings of the
IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2023, pp. 8578-8587.
[22] S. Yang et al., "ShapeEditor: A stylegan encoder for stable and high fidelity face swapping,"
Frontiers in Neurorobotics, vol. 15, p. 785808, 2022.
[23] Y. Mirsky and W. Lee, "The creation and detection of deepfakes: A survey," ACM computing
surveys (CSUR), vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 1-41, 2021.
[24] J. Ho, A. Jain, and P. Abbeel, "Denoising diffusion probabilistic models," Advances in neural
information processing systems, vol. 33, pp. 6840-6851, 2020.
[25] S. K. Datta, S. Jia, and S. Lyu, "Exposing Lip-syncing Deepfakes from Mouth Inconsistencies," arXiv
preprint arXiv:2401.10113, 2024.
[26] M. Ghorbandoost and V. Saba, "Designing a New Non-parallel Training Method to Voice
Conversion with Better Performance than Parallel Training," Paramedical Sciences and Military
Health, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 6-16, 2015.
[27] L. Serrano, S. Raman, D. Tavarez, E. Navas, and I. Hernaez, "Parallel vs. Non-Parallel Voice
Conversion for Esophageal Speech," in INTERSPEECH, 2019, pp. 4549-4553.
[28] M. Baas, B. van Niekerk, and H. Kamper, "Voice conversion with just nearest neighbors," arXiv
preprint arXiv:2305.18975, 2023.
[29] S. Chen et al., "Wavlm: Large-scale self-supervised pre-training for full stack speech processing,"
IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 1505-1518, 2022.
[30] J. Kong, J. Kim, and J. Bae, "Hifi-gan: Generative adversarial networks for efficient and high fidelity
speech synthesis," Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 33, pp. 17022-17033,
2020.