Title: Analyzing the Influence of Artificial Intelligence Integration to the English

Accuracy of STEM Students at Benigno V. Aldana National High School

CHAPTER 1
THE PROBLEM

Background the Study

The rapid integration of technology in education has paved the way for innovative
approaches to teaching and learning, with Artificial Intelligence (AI) emerging as a
significant tool in this evolution. With the increased utilization rate of AI tools, it has been
used in education and has the potential to address some of the limitations of traditional
teaching methods, such as large class sizes and varied learning paces, by providing tailored
feedback and support to individual learners (Luckin et al., 2016).
The English language has increasingly been used as a means of communication
internationally, and thus is used in almost every domain of communication world-wide.
Consequently, the demand for English language skills and English language education, as
English language professionals are most acutely aware, has exploded (Khamkhien, 2011). As
a result, learning English apart from first language or national language is substantially
needed nowadays (Khamkhien, 2011). English is, thus, the most widely taught foreign
language at all stages of education system of several countries, including The Philippines.
Among the prominent AI tools in the realm of language education are Grammarly,
Turnitin, Quillbot, ChatGPT, and Mendeley. Grammarly, for instance, offers real-time
grammar checking and suggestions to improve writing proficiency. Its AI powered
algorithms analyze text for grammatical errors, punctuation, style, and tone, providing
learners with instant feedback to enhance their writing skills (Borin, 2019). Turnitin, on the
other hand, utilizes AI to detect plagiarism by comparing submitted documents against a vast
database of academic content, helping educators uphold academic integrity standards (Zhu et
al., 2020).
It has been found out that AI integration in language education offers numerous
potential benefits, including enhanced learning outcomes, personalized learning experiences,
adaptive assessment strategies, and increased student engagement (Dalan, 2023). Educators
can create inclusive and effective language learning environments that empower Filipino
learners to succeed in a globalized world by strategically and ethically leveraging AI
technologies. However, addressing issues such as equitable access, data privacy, algorithmic
bias, and cultural relevance is critical to realizing AI's full potential in language education.
Though artificial intelligence offers a lot of benefits in terms of language learning,
which in this case is English, it also has its drawbacks. It was identified that there may be
possible issues, such as cheating, fabrication of data, and a decrease in creativity and critical
thinking (Giray et al., 2024). Furthermore, using AI might also lead to the loss of academic
integrity. According to the study conducted by Ventayen (2023), it was found out that half of
the students from Pangasinan State University, Lingayen Campus, are prone to cheating and
might use an AI tool like ChatGPT to create content for their submissions, which could
jeopardize the integrity of the educational system. Nevertheless, some students also regard
ChatGPT as a helpful resource and a technology innovation.
This study aims to analyze the influence of AI integration to the English accuracy of
STEM students. By investigating this, the research seeks to provide valuable insights for
educators, policymakers, and technology developers on the potential of AI to improve
language learning outcomes. The findings of this study could inform the development of
more effective AI-driven educational tools and strategies, ultimately contributing to the
enhancement of English language education.

Statement of the Problem

The purpose of this study is to analyze the influence of the use of Artificial
Intelligence (AI) tools and the English accuracy of STEM students. With the rapid
advancement of AI in educational settings, AI-powered applications such as chatbots,
paraphrasers, summarizers, and grammar correction systems have become increasingly
common in enhancing language skills. However, it remains necessary to understand the
extent to which AI integration influences the development of English fluency, particularly
among STEM students at BVANHS. Specifically, this study aims to answer the following
questions:
1. What are the common AI tools used by the students and what are the reasons they are
using them?
2. How does AI integration influence the STEM students along the following:
a. Sentence construction
b. Diction
c. Spelling
3. What is the current level of English accuracy among STEM students at BVANHS?

Scope and Delimitation

This study focuses on analyzing the influence of artificial intelligence (AI) integration
on the English language accuracy of STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and
Mathematics) students at Benigno V. Aldana of National High School (BVANHS). The
research will evaluate various AI tools, such as grammar checkers, writing assistants, and
language learning applications, and their effectiveness in improving students' writing and
communication skills. The study will involve a quantitative assessment through surveys and
qualitative feedback through survey and questionnaires, targeting a sample size of STEM
students across different grade levels. The timeframe for data collection will be one academic
quarter.
The study will be limited to STEM students at BVANHS and will not include students
from other academic tracks or institutions. It will specifically assess only the impact of AI
tools on English writing accuracy, excluding other aspects of language learning such as
speaking, listening, or reading skills. Furthermore, the research will not evaluate the broader
implications of AI integration on educational practices beyond English language learning.
Participants will be selected based on their willingness to engage with AI tools and their
proficiency in English at the outset of the study, which may limit the generalizability of the
findings to the entire STEM student population.

Significance of the Study

This study will provide insights into how integrating AI tools, such as grammar
checkers or language models, can affect the accuracy of English language use among STEM
students at BVANHS. It will help educators understand the role of AI in terms of enhancing
language skills, particularly in technical fields like STEM, where precise grammar is
necessary.
STEM Students. This research will help students improve their English proficiency and fix
grammatical errors, leading to better academic performance and clearer communication. It
will also guide them on how to use these tools correctly without relying too much on AI.
Teachers. They will gain valuable information on how AI tools affect their students' English
learning. This can help them adjust their teaching methods to balance traditional ways of
learning and the use of technology.
School Administrators. They can use the findings to decide if AI tools should be part of the
school curriculum. It will help them create rules about using AI in the classroom in a way that
benefits students.
Parents. This study will help parents see how AI tools affect their children's English skills
and academic performance. It will guide them in helping their children use AI wisely while
still improving their language skills independently.
Future Researchers. The study will add to the knowledge about AI in education and can be
used by future researchers to study its effects on other areas of learning.

Definition of Terms
In order to provide clarity and ensure a common understanding of the key concept
used throughout this study, the following terms are both conceptually defined and
operationally defined.
Academic Integrity. Academic integrity refers to the ethical code of academia, which
includes values such as avoiding plagiarism, cheating, and ensuring honesty in research and
writing (Macfarlane et al., 2014).
In this study, academic integrity focuses on the concerns raised regarding the potential
misuse of AI tools by students for cheating or fabricating content in their English
assignments.
Adaptive Learning. Adaptive learning is an educational approach that uses technology and
algorithms to personalize the learning experience, adjusting content and pacing based on the
learner's needs and performance (Gibson & Webb, 2013).
In this study, adaptive learning refers to how AI tools such as Grammarly and ChatGPT
provide personalized feedback to students, helping them improve their English writing at
their own pace.

AI Integration. AI integration refers to the seamless incorporation of artificial intelligence

technologies into various systems, processes, or fields to enhance functionality and efficiency
(Zawacki-Richter et al., 2019).
In this study, AI integration involves the use of AI-powered tools by STEM students to
improve their English language accuracy, particularly in writing skills.

Artificial Intelligence (AI). Artificial Intelligence refers to the simulation of human

intelligence in machines that are designed to perform tasks that typically require human
cognition, such as learning, reasoning, and problem-solving (Russell & Norvig, 2021).
In this study, AI refers to the specific tools (e.g., Grammarly, Turnitin, ChatGPT) used by
students to improve their English accuracy, focusing on grammar, sentence construction,
diction, and spelling.

Critical Thinking. Critical thinking is the intellectually disciplined process of actively and
skillfully conceptualizing, applying, analyzing, synthesizing, and evaluating information to
reach conclusions (Paul & Elder, 2014).
In this study, critical thinking refers to the ability of students to independently analyze and
evaluate information in their English writing, without over-reliance on AI tools.

Diction. Diction is the choice and use of words in speech or writing, affecting the clarity and
style of communication (Fowler, 1996).
In this study, diction refers to the students' ability to select appropriate and accurate words in
their writing when assisted by AI tools such as Grammarly or ChatGPT.

Digital Literacy. Digital literacy is the ability to use information and communication
technologies effectively, including skills in finding, evaluating, creating, and communicating
information online (Gilster, 1997).
In the context of this study, digital literacy refers to the STEM students' ability to use AI tools
and other technologies effectively to enhance their English writing accuracy.
English Accuracy. English accuracy is the degree to which language learners use correct
grammar, vocabulary, spelling, and syntax in both spoken and written communication
(Crystal, 2003).
In this study, English accuracy pertains to the correctness of sentence construction, diction,
and spelling in the written outputs of STEM students at BVANHS, as influenced by the use
of AI tools.

Learning Outcomes. Learning outcomes are the measurable knowledge, skills, attitudes, and
competencies that students are expected to acquire as a result of a learning process (Biggs &
Tang, 2011).
For this research, learning outcomes refer to the improvements in English accuracy (sentence
construction, diction, spelling) among STEM students as influenced by their use of AI tools.

Plagiarism Detection. Plagiarism detection refers to the use of software tools to identify
instances where a text has been copied from another source without proper attribution (Zhu et
al., 2020).
In this research, Turnitin is highlighted as an AI tool that checks students' English writing for
plagiarism, ensuring that their submissions are original.

Sentence Construction. Sentence construction refers to the arrangement of words and

phrases to create well-formed sentences in a language, adhering to the rules of grammar
(Quirk & Greenbaum, 1973).
The term in this study refers to the way students structure their sentences when using AI tools
to improve their English writing skills.

Spelling. Spelling is the process or activity of writing or naming the letters of a word in the
correct sequence (Crystal, 2003).
Spelling in this study refers to the accuracy with which students write words correctly, with
the assistance of AI tools during their English writing tasks.

Student Engagement. Student engagement refers to the degree of attention, curiosity, and
interest that students show in their learning activities, which affects their motivation and
achievement (Fredricks et al., 2004).
In this research, student engagement refers to how the use of AI tools increases students’
interest and involvement in improving their English language skills
References
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). *Teaching for Quality Learning at University*. McGraw-Hill
Education.

Borin, L. (2019). Grammarly: Does it Make the Grade in English Writing Accuracy?
*Language Journal, 20*(2), 157-173.

Bybee, R. W. (2013). The Case for STEM Education: Challenges and Opportunities. *NSTA
Press*.

Crystal, D. (2003). *The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language*. Cambridge

University Press.

Fowler, H. W. (1996). *A Dictionary of Modern English Usage*. Oxford University Press.

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of
the concept, state of the evidence. *Review of Educational Research, 74*(1), 59-109.

Gibson, D., & Webb, M. (2013). Networked learning environments and adaptive learning
technologies. *Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29*(1), 1-3.

Gilster, P. (1997). *Digital Literacy*. Wiley.

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. *Review of Educational
Research, 77*(1), 81-112.

Hwang, G.-J., Wang, S.-Y., & Lai, C.-L. (2020). Effects of a social regulation-based online
learning framework on students' learning performance and perceptions. *Educational
Technology & Society, 23*(4), 136–148. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26903430

Kirkpatrick, A. (2020). *English as a Lingua Franca in ASEAN: A multilingual model*.

Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203735150
Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence Unleashed: An
argument for AI in education. Pearson. Retrieved from
https://www.pearson.com/content/dam/one-dot-com/one-dot-com/global/Files/about-
pearson/innovation/open-ideas/Intelligence-Unleashed.pdf

Macfarlane, B., Zhang, J., & Pun, A. (2014). Academic integrity: A review of the literature.
*Studies in Higher Education, 39*(2), 339-358.

Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2014). *Critical Thinking: Tools for Taking Charge of Your
Professional and Personal Life*. FT Press.

Quirk, R., & Greenbaum, S. (1973). *A University Grammar of English*. Longman.

Robertson, R. (1992). *Globalization: Social Theory and Global Culture*. SAGE.

Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2021). *Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach* (4th ed.).
Pearson.

Sokolova, M., Teterin, A., & Churakova, Y. (2020). Challenges in English language teaching
and learning in Russian schools. *Journal of Language and Education, 6*(4), 28-39.
https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2020.9838

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of
research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators?
*International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16*(1), 1-27.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0173-8