Reduction of Order: Discussion Problems
Reduction of Order: Discussion Problems
● Section 4.1
INTRODUCTION In the preceding section we saw that the general solution of a homogeneous
linear second-order differential equation
a2(x)y# & a1(x)y% & a0 (x)y ! 0 (1)
is a linear combination y ! c1 y1 & c2 y2, where y1 and y2 are solutions that constitute a linearly inde-
pendent set on some interval I. Beginning in the next section, we examine a method for determining
these solutions when the coefficients of the differential equation in (1) are constants. This method,
which is a straightforward exercise in algebra, breaks down in a few cases and yields only a single
solution y1 of the DE. It turns out that we can construct a second solution y2 of a homogeneous equa-
tion (1) (even when the coefficients in (1) are variable) provided that we know a nontrivial solution
y1 of the DE. The basic idea described in this section is that equation (1) can be reduced to a linear
first-order DE by means of a substitution involving the known solution y1. A second solution y2 of
(1) is apparent after this first-order differential equation is solved.
Given that y1 ! e x is a solution of y" # y ! 0 on the interval (#$, $), use reduction
of order to find a second solution y2.
Since e x % 0, the last equation requires u" & 2u' ! 0. If we make the substitution
w ! u', this linear second-order equation in u becomes w' & 2w ! 0, which is a
linear first-order equation in w. Using the integrating factor e 2x, we can write
d 2x
[e w] ! 0. After integrating, we get w ! c1e#2x or u' ! c1e#2x. Integrating
dx
again then yields u ! #12 c1 e#2x & c2. Thus
c1 #x
y ! u(x)ex ! # e & c2 ex. (2)
2
By picking c2 ! 0 and c1 ! #2, we obtain the desired second solution, y2 ! e#x.
Because W(e x, e #x) % 0 for every x, the solutions are linearly independent on
(#$, $).
Since we have shown that y1 ! e x and y2 ! e#x are linearly independent solu-
tions of a linear second-order equation, the expression in (2) is actually the general
solution of y" # y ! 0 on (#$, $).
GENERAL CASE Suppose we divide by a2(x) to put equation (1) in the standard
form
y" & P(x)y' & Q(x)y ! 0, (3)
where P(x) and Q(x) are continuous on some interval I. Let us suppose further that
y1(x) is a known solution of (3) on I and that y1(x) % 0 for every x in the interval. If
we define y ! u(x)y1(x), it follows that
y' ! uy'1 & y1u', y" ! uy"1 & 2y'1u' & y1u "
y" & Py' & Qy ! u[ y1" & Py1' & Qy1] & y1u" & (2y1' & Py1)u' ! 0.
zero
where we have let w ! u'. Observe that the last equation in (4) is both linear and
separable. Separating variables and integrating, we obtain
dw y'
& 2 1 dx & P dx ! 0
w y1
We solve the last equation for w, use w ! u', and integrate again:
u ! c1 ! e#"P d x
y21
dx & c2.
132 ● CHAPTER 4 HIGHER-ORDER DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
y2 ! y1(x) ! e#"P(x) d x
y21(x)
dx. (5)
It makes a good review of differentiation to verify that the function y2(x) defined in
(5) satisfies equation (3) and that y1 and y2 are linearly independent on any interval
on which y1(x) is not zero.
! x2 ! dx
x
! x 2 ln x.
The general solution on the interval (0, &) is given by y ! c1 y1 % c2 y2; that is,
y ! c1x 2 % c2 x 2 ln x.
REMARKS
(i) The derivation and use of formula (5) have been illustrated here because this
formula appears again in the next section and in Sections 4.7 and 6.2. We use (5)
simply to save time in obtaining a desired result. Your instructor will tell you
whether you should memorize (5) or whether you should know the first princi-
ples of reduction of order.
(ii) Reduction of order can be used to find the general solution of a nonhomo-
geneous equation a2 (x)y" % a1(x)y$ % a 0 (x)y ! g(x) whenever a solution y1 of
the associated homogeneous equation is known. See Problems 17 – 20 in
Exercises 4.2.
INTRODUCTION As a means of motivating the discussion in this section, let us return to first-
order differential equations—more specifically, to homogeneous linear equations ay$ # by % 0,
where the coefficients a & 0 and b are constants. This type of equation can be solved either by
separation of variables or with the aid of an integrating factor, but there is another solution method,
one that uses only algebra. Before illustrating this alternative method, we make one observation:
Solving ay$ # by % 0 for y$ yields y$ % ky, where k is a constant. This observation reveals the
nature of the unknown solution y; the only nontrivial elementary function whose derivative is a
constant multiple of itself is an exponential function e mx. Now the new solution method: If we substi-
tute y % e mx and y$ % me mx into ay$ # by % 0, we get
amemx # bemx % 0 or emx (am # b) % 0.
Since e mx is never zero for real values of x, the last equation is satisfied only when m is a solution or
root of the first-degree polynomial equation am # b % 0. For this single value of m, y % e mx is a
solution of the DE. To illustrate, consider the constant-coefficient equation 2y$ # 5y % 0. It is not
necessary to go through the differentiation and substitution of y % e mx into the DE; we merely have
to form the equation 2m # 5 % 0 and solve it for m. From m % !52 we conclude that y % e!5x/2 is a
solution of 2y$ # 5y % 0, and its general solution on the interval (!', ') is y % c1e!5x/2.
In this section we will see that the foregoing procedure can produce exponential solutions for
homogeneous linear higher-order DEs,
an y(n) # an!1 y(n!1) # ( ( ( # a2 y" # a1 y$ # a0 y % 0, (1)
where the coefficients ai , i % 0, 1, . . . , n are real constants and an & 0.