Sex assigned at Work Experience

Respondent Age Highest Educational Attainment Position

birth (Years)

1 34 M 9 Bachelor's Degree Technical

2 45 F 5 Doctorate Degree Clerical
3 31 F 6 Master's Degree Technical
4 44 M 11 Master's Degree Technical
5 23 M 2 Bachelor's Degree Clerical
6 25 F 3 Master's Degree Technical
7 23 M 2 Bachelor's Degree Clerical
8 24 M 3 Master's Degree Clerical
9 26 M 4 Master's Degree Technical
10 25 F 0.8 Bachelor's Degree Clerical
11 32 M 8 Master's Degree Technical
12 36 F 9 Master's Degree Technical
13 48 M 16 Bachelor's Degree Admin
14 40 F 17 Bachelor's Degree Admin
15 58 F 39 College Undergraduate Technical
16 50 M 2 Doctorate Degree Admin
17 63 F 44 College Undergraduate Technical
18 55 M 33.5 Master's Degree Division Head
19 49 F 25 Master's Degree Division Head
20 34 F 0.5 Bachelor's Degree Technical
Number of
Trainings
Employee Workplace Turnover
attended in Job Performance Job Loyalty
Empowerment Environment Intention
the last 3
years

9 5 4.4 5 4.6 5
5 3.6 2.6 3.6 3.6 3.8
3 4 3.8 3.6 4 4.2
10 5 5 5 5 5
6 4.4 4.2 4.6 4.4 4.7
10 3.4 3.8 4.6 3 3.7
4 4.6 4.4 4.8 4.6 5
4 4 4 4 4.2 4.2
21 4.8 4.6 5 5 5
3 3.6 3.6 4 3.4 3.3
20 3.2 3.4 3.8 4 3
5 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.6 5
4 4.8 3.8 5 5 5
16 4 3.2 4.6 4.2 4.2
7 4 4 4 4 4.3
7 4.8 5 5 5 5
7 4 4 5 4.6 4.7
30 4.2 4 4 4 3.8
6 4.4 4.8 5 5 5
6 1.8 1.8 3 3.2 2.7
 Turnover Job Workplace Employee
Job Loyalty Intention Performance Environment Empowerment
1. Authority is delegated to reduce issues and concerns inside the office
2. Encouraged to perform well in handling concerns to reduce potential risks inside the office
3. Mutual trust among colleagues
4. Participation on decision-making that affect the job
5. Supervisor gives feedback about work

6. Personalize workspace to one's taste/preference

7. Workspace is a common area
8. Workspace is conducive for working
9. Workspace is sufficient for filing documents
10. Workplace is free from noise or any form of disturbances

11. Performance is better than that of colleagues with similar qualifications

12. Good performance on assigned task
13. Job performance is executed efficiently and effectively
14. Job performance is executed with enthusiasm and quality
15. Workload allows to do a good job

16. Resigning is not an option

17. Layoffs and/or deployments are to a minimal
18. Job is a stepping stone on pursuing higher professional career
19. Job role is definite and clear
20. Work is challenging and can be handled alone

21. Continuing to work in the same organization

22. Organization has a positive environment
23. Personal values fit with those of the organization
24. Supports organization in any way
25. Employees are treated like family
26. Important member of the work team
 Respondent
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
5 4 4 5 4 3 5 4 4 4 3 4 5 4 4 5
5 4 4 5 4 4 5 4 5 4 4 5 5 4 4 5
5 3 4 5 5 3 4 4 5 3 3 5 4 4 4 4
5 3 4 5 5 4 4 4 5 3 2 5 5 4 4 5
5 4 4 5 4 3 5 4 5 4 4 5 5 4 4 5
5.0 3.6 4.0 5.0 4.4 3.4 4.6 4.0 4.8 3.6 3.2 4.8 4.8 4.0 4.0 4.8
5 3 4 5 5 4 4 4 5 4 4 5 5 3 4 5
5 3 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 5 4 3 4 5
4 2 4 5 5 4 5 4 5 4 4 4 3 3 4 5
4 2 3 5 4 4 5 4 4 4 4 5 3 3 4 5
4 3 4 5 3 3 4 4 5 3 2 5 4 4 4 5
4.4 2.6 3.8 5 4.2 3.8 4.4 4 4.6 3.6 3.4 4.8 3.8 3.2 4 5
5 3 3 5 4 4 4 4 5 4 3 4 5 4 4 5
5 4 4 5 5 5 5 4 5 4 4 5 5 5 4 5
5 4 4 5 5 5 5 4 5 4 4 5 5 5 4 5
5 4 4 5 5 5 5 4 5 4 4 5 5 5 4 5
5 3 3 5 4 4 5 4 5 4 4 5 5 4 4 5
5 3.6 3.6 5 4.6 4.6 4.8 4 5 4 3.8 4.8 5 4.6 4 5
5 3 5 5 3 3 5 5 5 3 3 4 5 4 4 5
4 3 3 5 5 2 5 4 5 3 3 5 5 3 4 5
5 4 4 5 5 3 5 4 5 3 5 4 5 4 4 5
4 4 4 5 5 3 4 4 5 3 5 5 5 5 4 5
5 4 4 5 4 4 4 4 5 5 4 5 5 5 4 5
4.6 3.6 4 5 4.4 3 4.6 4.2 5 3.4 4 4.6 5 4.2 4 5
5 4 4 5 4 3 5 5 5 4 3 5 5 5 4 5
5 4 4 5 4 3 5 4 5 4 1 5 5 4 4 5
5 4 4 5 5 4 5 4 5 3 3 5 5 4 4 5
5 4 5 5 5 3 5 4 5 3 4 5 5 4 4 5
5 4 4 5 5 4 5 4 5 3 3 5 5 4 5 5
5 3 4 5 5 5 5 4 5 3 4 5 5 4 5 5
5 3.83 4.17 5 4.67 3.67 5 4.17 5 3.33 3 5 5 4.17 4.33 5
 17 18 19 20 Mean Overall Mean SD
4 4 4 1 4.00 0.92
4 4 4 2 4.25 0.72
4 4 5 1 3.95 1.00
4 4 5 2 4.10 0.97
4 5 4 3 4.30 4.12 0.66
4.0 4.2 4.4 1.8
4 4 4 1 4.10 0.97
4 4 5 4 4.05 0.69
4 4 5 1 3.95 1.05
4 4 5 1 3.85 1.04
4 4 5 2 3.85 3.96 0.93
4 4 4.8 1.8
5 4 5 3 4.15 0.75
5 4 5 3 4.55 0.60
5 4 5 3 4.55 0.60
5 4 5 4 4.60 0.50
5 4 5 2 4.25 4.42 0.85
5 4 5 3
5 4 5 5 4.30 0.86
4 4 5 2 3.95 1.05
4 4 5 5 4.40 0.68
5 4 5 2 4.30 0.86
5 4 5 2 4.40 4.27 0.75
4.6 4 5 3.2
5 4 5 4 4.45 0.69
4 4 5 1 4.05 1.19
5 3 5 2 4.25 0.91
5 4 5 4 4.45 0.69
4 4 5 3 4.35 0.75
5 4 5 2 4.40 4.32 0.88
4.67 3.83 5 2.67
Table 1
Level of Satisfaction of Employees along Employee Empowerment
Indicators
1. Authority is delegated to reduce issues and concerns inside the office
2. Encouraged to perform well in handling concerns to reduce potential risks inside the office
3. Mutual trust among colleagues
4. Participation on decision-making that affect the job
5. Supervisor gives feedback about work
Overall Mean

Interpretations:
Table 1 shows the level of satisfaction of employees along employee empowerment.
It can be noted that the overall satisfaction of the respondents have a mean score of 4.12
This is interpreted as High Satisfaction. This means that the employees perceive a positive attitude
in terms of the mechanisms that the agency provide for them to be empowered. These include
handling conflicts, encouraging employees to do their best, there is trust among employees, etc.

The standard deviation obtained from each position ranges from 0.66 to 1.
This implies that the data points tend to be closer to the mean, indicating low variance.
The fifth indicator, having 0.66 standard deviation score, has the least variance.

Moreover, it revealed that the highest mean of 4.30 was obtained along the indicator,
"Supervisor gives feedback about work." This is described as high satisfaction. This implies
that employees are most satisfied when they are provided with feedback regarding their work. Particularly,
they are satisfied if their superiors point out their strengths, weaknesses, or points for improvement.

On the other hand, it is indicated that the lowest mean of 3.95 was noted along "Mutual trust among colleagues".
However, even if it has the lowest mean, it is still categorized as high satisfaction.

Table 2
Level of Satisfaction of Employees along Workplace Environment
Indicators
6. Personalize workspace to one's taste/preference
7. Workspace is a common area
8. Workspace is conducive for working
9. Workspace is sufficient for filing documents
10. Workplace is free from noise or any form of disturbances
Overall Mean

Interpretations:
Table 2 shows the level of satisfaction of employees along workplace environment.
It can be noted that the overall satisfaction of the respondents have a mean score of 3.96
This is interpreted as High Satisfaction. This means that the employees perceive a positive attitude
in terms of the environment that the agency provide for them to work at. These include
a nice office place, sufficient work materials, etc.

The standard deviation obtained from each position ranges from 0.69 to 1.05
It suggests that the data points tend to be closer to the mean, indicating low variance.
The standard deviation having 1.05 indicates the highest variance.

Moreover, it revealed that the highest mean of 4.10 was obtained along the indicator,
"Personalize workspace to one's taste/preference." This is described as high satisfaction. This implies
that employees are most satisfied with the workplace they are given. Particularly,
as such areas are tailored to each employee's preferences.

On the other hand, it is indicated that the lowest mean of 3.85 was noted along
"Workspace is sufficient for filing documents" and "Workplace is free from noise or any form of disturbances."
However, even if it has the lowest mean, it is still categorized as high satisfaction.

Table 3
Level of Satisfaction of Employees along Job Performance
Indicators
11. Performance is better than that of colleagues with similar qualifications
12. Good performance on assigned task
13. Job performance is executed efficiently and effectively
14. Job performance is executed with enthusiasm and quality
15. Workload allows to do a good job
Overall Mean

Interpretations:
Table 3 shows the level of satisfaction of employees along job performance.
It can be noted that the overall satisfaction of the respondents have a mean score of 4.42
This is interpreted as High Satisfaction, nearing the very high category. This means that the employees
have a good attitude in terms of their performance of their jobs. These include
positive competitiveness, achieving good results on KPIs, etc.

The standard deviation obtained from each position ranges from 0.60 to 0.85
Since the data points are close to one, the data points tend to be closer to the mean, indicating low variance.
The fourth indicator, having 0.50 standard deviation score, has the least variance.

Moreover, it revealed that the highest mean of 4.60 was obtained along the indicator,
"Job performance is executed with enthusiasm and quality." This is described as very high satisfaction. This implies
that employees are very happy with their work. Additionally, their work are affected by their positive view
resulting to good quality services and outputs.

On the other hand, it is indicated that the lowest mean of 4.15 was noted along
"Performance is better than that of colleagues with similar qualifications". However,
even if it has the lowest mean, it is still categorized as high satisfaction.

Table 4
Level of Satisfaction of Employees along Turnover Intention
Indicators
16. Resigning is not an option
17. Layoffs and/or deployments are to a minimal
18. Job is a stepping stone on pursuing higher professional career
19. Job role is definite and clear
20. Work is challenging and can be handled alone
Overall Mean

Interpretations:
Table 4 shows the level of satisfaction of employees along turnover intention.
It can be noted that the overall satisfaction of the respondents have a mean score of 4.27
This is interpreted as High Satisfaction. This means that the employees are satisfied with their current workplace
indicating a low chance of resigning or finding a new company.

The standard deviation obtained from each position ranges from 0.68 to 1.05
It suggests that the resulting values are close to 1. This implies that the data points tend to be closer to the mean.
The second indicator having obtined a standard deviation of 1.05 might have the most variance.

Moreover, it revealed that the highest mean of 4.40 was obtained along the indicator,
"Job is a stepping stone on pursuing higher professional career." This is described as high satisfaction.
This implies that employees are very optimistic that their current job will provide them experience and knowledge f

On the other hand, it is indicated that the lowest mean of 3.95 was noted along "Layoffs and/or deployments are to
However, even if it has the lowest mean, it is still categorized as high satisfaction.

Table 5
Level of Satisfaction of Employees along Job Loyalty
Indicators
21. Continuing to work in the same organization
22. Organization has a positive environment
23. Personal values fit with those of the organization
24. Supports organization in any way
25. Employees are treated like family
26. Important member of the work team
Overall Mean

Interpretations:
Table 5 shows the level of satisfaction of employees along job loyalty.
It can be noted that the overall satisfaction of the respondents have a mean score of 4.33
This is interpreted as High Satisfaction. This means that the employees are satisfied with their current workplace
indicating loyalty to the current organization and sees continuous operation.

The standard deviation obtained from each position ranges from 0.69 to 1.19
It shows the most range among the standard deviations. However, data points
are still relatively close to one. The 1.19 standard deviation score is the biggest value obtained in the whole data set
It indicates the most variance.

Moreover, it revealed that the highest mean of 4.45 was obtained along the indicator,
"Supports organization in any way." This is described as high satisfaction.
This implies that employees are very supportive towards the organization and are.
willing to support it in any way they can, going over their job descriptions.

On the other hand, it is indicated that the lowest mean of 4.05 was noted along
"Continuing to work in the same organization" and "Organization has a positive environment."
However, even if it has the lowest mean, it is still categorized as high satisfaction.
 Mean DER SD Range Descriptive Equivalent Rating
4.00 High 0.92 4.51 – 5.00 Very High
4.25 High 0.72 3. 51 – 4.50 High
3.95 High 1.00 2. 51 – 3.50 Moderate
4.10 High 0.97 1.51 – 2.50 Poor
4.30 High 0.66 1.00 – 1.50 Very Poor
4.12 High

work. Particularly,
provement.

rust among colleagues".

Mean DER SD Range Descriptive Equivalent Rating

4.10 High 0.97 4.51 – 5.00 Very High
4.05 High 0.69 3. 51 – 4.50 High
3.95 High 1.05 2. 51 – 3.50 Moderate
3.85 High 1.04 1.51 – 2.50 Poor
3.85 High 0.93 1.00 – 1.50 Very Poor
3.96 High
This implies

rm of disturbances."

Mean DER SD Range Descriptive Equivalent Rating

4.15 High 0.75 4.51 – 5.00 Very High
4.55 Very High 0.60 3. 51 – 4.50 High
4.55 Very High 0.60 2. 51 – 3.50 Moderate
4.60 Very High 0.50 1.51 – 2.50 Poor
4.25 High 0.85 1.00 – 1.50 Very Poor
4.42 High

e employees

ating low variance.

satisfaction. This implies

eir positive view

Mean DER SD Range Descriptive Equivalent Rating

4.30 High 0.86 4.51 – 5.00 Very High
3.95 High 1.05 3. 51 – 4.50 High
4.40 High 0.68 2. 51 – 3.50 Moderate
4.30 High 0.86 1.51 – 2.50 Poor
4.40 High 0.75 1.00 – 1.50 Very Poor
4.27 High

heir current workplace

o be closer to the mean.

satisfaction.
perience and knowledge for future endeavors.

nd/or deployments are to a minimal".

Mean DER SD Range Descriptive Equivalent Rating

4.45 High 0.69 4.51 – 5.00 Very High
4.05 High 1.19 3. 51 – 4.50 High
 4.25 High 0.91 2. 51 – 3.50 Moderate
4.45 High 0.69 1.51 – 2.50 Poor
4.35 High 0.75 1.00 – 1.50 Very Poor
4.4 High 0.88
4.32 High

heir current workplace

ned in the whole data set.

 Equivalent Rating
ery High
High
Moderate
Poor
ery Poor

Equivalent Rating
ery High
High
Moderate
Poor
ery Poor
 Equivalent Rating
ery High
High
Moderate
Poor
ery Poor
 Equivalent Rating
ery High
High
Moderate
Poor
ery Poor

Equivalent Rating
ery High
High
Moderate
Poor
ery Poor
 Position Employee Empowerment

Admin 4.8 Admin

Admin 4 4.8
Admin 4.8 4
Clerical 3.6 4.8
Clerical 4.4
Clerical 4.6
Clerical 4
Clerical 3.6
Division Head 4.2
Division Head 4.4
Technical 5
Technical 4
Technical 5
Technical 3.4 Admin
Technical 4.8
Technical 3.2 Mean
Technical 4.8 Standard Error
Technical 4 Median
Technical 4 Mode
Technical 1.8 Standard Devia
Sample Varianc
Kurtosis
Skewness
Range
Minimum
Maximum
Sum
Count

Table 1
Level of Satisfaction of Employees along Employee Empowerment when grouped according to Position
Groups Mean DER SD
Admin 4.53 High 0.46
Clerical 4.04 High 0.45
Division Head 4.30 High 0.14
Technilcal 4.00 High 1.00
Overall Mean 4.22 High

Interpretations:
Table 1 shows the level of satisfaction of employees along empoyee empowerment when grouped according to pos
It can be noted that the overall satisfaction of 4.22 mean score, falls under the high satisfaction category.
This indicates that the employees perceive a positive attitude in terms of the mechanisms that the organization prov
feel empowered based on their job positions. These include enabling employees to take ownership of their works, m

The standard deviation obtained from each position ranges from 0.46 to 1. This implies that it suggests that the dat

Moreover, it can be observed that the highest mean of 4.53 was obtained from the employees with the administrati
This is described as high satisfaction. This can imply that the the people of that position are most satisfied with their
along with the lines of having the capacity to act independently in accordance with their jobs and being included in

Additionally, in can be noted the lowest mean is 4.00 from the people with technical positions. Although the lowest
This can imply that the employees of this position are still satisfied with their working conditions.
Changes in policies are recommended to improve the satisfaction of the technical position people.
 Clerical Division Head Technical
3.6 4.2 5
4.4 4.4 4
4.6 5
4 3.4
3.6 4.8
3.2
4.8
4
4
1.8

Admin Clerical

4.5333333333 Mean 4.04

0.2666666667 Standard Error 0.2039607805
4.8 Median 4
4.8 Mode 3.6
0.4618802154 Standard Deviat 0.45607017
0.2133333333 Sample Variance 0.208
#DIV/0! Kurtosis -2.50739645
-1.7320508076 Skewness 0.227697755
0.8 Range 1
4 Minimum 3.6
4.8 Maximum 4.6
13.6 Sum 20.2
3 Count 5
1 1

rding to Position Range Descriptive Equivalent Rating

4.51 – 5.00 Very High
3. 51 – 4.50 High
2. 51 – 3.50 Moderate
1.51 – 2.50 Poor
1.00 – 1.50 Very Poor

hen grouped according to position.

tisfaction category.
ms that the organization provide, enabling them to
 e ownership of their works, make decisions, taking initiative, etc.

s that it suggests that the data points tend to be closer to the mean, indicating low variance.

mployees with the administrative positions.

n are most satisfied with their working conditions,
ir jobs and being included in decision making.

ositions. Although the lowest, it still falls under the high satisfaction category.
conditions.
tion people.
 Division Head Technical

Mean 4.3 Mean 4

Standard Erro 0.1 Standard Erro 0.31832897
Median 4.3 Median 4
Mode #N/A Mode 4
Standard Devi0.141421356 Standard Devi1.006644591
Sample Varian 0.02 Sample Varian1.013333333
Kurtosis #DIV/0! Kurtosis 1.353606055
Skewness #DIV/0! Skewness -1.13718074
Range 0.2 Range 3.2
Minimum 4.2 Minimum 1.8
Maximum 4.4 Maximum 5
Sum 8.6 Sum 40
Count 2 Count 10
1 1

alent Rating
gh

ate

oor
 Age Workplace Environment

34 4.4 20-30 31-40 41-50 50+

45 2.6 4.2 4.4 2.6 4
31 3.8 3.8 3.8 5 4
44 5 4.4 3.4 4.8 4
23 4.2 4 4.8 5
25 3.8 4.6 3.2 4.8
23 4.4 3.6 1.8
24 4
26 4.6 20-30 31-40
25 3.6
32 3.4 Mean 4.1 Mean
36 4.8 Standard Er 0.1527525232 Standard Er
48 4.8 Median 4.1 Median
40 3.2 Mode #N/A Mode
58 4 Standard De0.3741657387 Standard De
50 5 Sample Var 0.14 Sample Var
63 4 Kurtosis -1.2 Kurtosis
55 4 Skewness -7.194245E-15 Skewness
49 4.8 Range 1 Range
34 1.8 Minimum 3.6 Minimum
Maximum 4.6 Maximum
Sum 24.6 Sum
Count 6 Count
1
Table 1
Level of Satisfaction of Employees along Workplace Environment when grouped according to Age
Groups Mean DER SD
20-30 4.1 High 0.15
31-40 3.57 High 0.43
41-50 4.44 High 0.46
50+ 4.00 High 0.00
Overall Mean 4.03 High

Interpretations:
Table 1 shows the level of satisfaction of employees along workplace environment when grouped according to age.
It can be noted that the overall satisfaction of 4.03 mean score, falls under the high satisfaction category.
This indicates that the employees perceive a positive attitude in terms of the mechanisms that the organization prov
These include enabling employees to take ownership of their works, make decisions, taking initiative, etc.

The standard deviation obtained from each age bracket ranges from 0.15 to 0.
Having 0 as a value on standard deviation depicts no variance in that particular set of data.
Moreover, it can be observed that the highest mean of 4.44 was obtained from the employees from the age group o
This is described as high satisfaction. This can imply that the the people of that age bracket are most satisfied with t
along with the lines of having the good workplace area that is tailored to their liking and sufficient workplace equipm

Additionally, in can be noted the lowest mean is 3.57 from the people with ages 31-40. Although the lowest, it still
This can imply that the employees of this age category, althouth not as much as the other age groups, are still satisfi
 31-40 41-50 50+

3.57 Mean 4.44 Mean 4

0.430245408007 Standard Error 0.4621688 Standard E 0
3.6 Median 4.8 Median 4
#N/A Mode 5 Mode 4
1.0538817137927 Standard Deviation 1.0334409 Standard D 0
1.1106666666667 Sample Variance 1.068 Sample Var 0
0.8767540629697 Kurtosis 4.8137861 Kurtosis #DIV/0!
-0.794638497881 Skewness -2.183897 Skewness #DIV/0!
3 Range 2.4 Range 0
1.8 Minimum 2.6 Minimum 4
4.8 Maximum 5 Maximum 4
21.4 Sum 22.2 Sum 12
6 Count 5 Count 3
1 1 1

ording to Age Range Descriptive Equivalent Rating

4.51 – 5.00 Very High
3. 51 – 4.50 High
2. 51 – 3.50 Moderate
1.51 – 2.50 Poor
1.00 – 1.50 Very Poor

when grouped according to age.

satisfaction category.
nisms that the organization provide, enabling them to feel empowered.
, taking initiative, etc.
employees from the age group of 41-50.
racket are most satisfied with their working conditions,
and sufficient workplace equipments, etc.

40. Although the lowest, it still falls under the high satisfaction category.
other age groups, are still satisfied with their working conditions.
 Job
Sex
Performance

M 5 M F M
F 3.6 5 3.6
F 3.6 5 3.6 Mean
M 5 4.6 4.6 Standard Error
M 4.6 4.8 4 Median
F 4.6 4 4.8 Mode
M 4.8 5 4.6 Standard Deviation
M 4 3.8 4 Sample Variance
M 5 5 5 Kurtosis
F 4 5 5 Skewness
M 3.8 4 3 Range
F 4.8 Minimum
M 5 Maximum
F 4.6 Sum
F 4 Count
M 5
F 5
M 4
F 5 Table 1
F 3 Level of Satisfaction of Employees along Job Performance when grouped
Groups Mean DER
M 4.62 Very High
F 4.22 High
Overall Mean 4.42 High

Interpretations:
Table 1 shows the level of satisfaction of employees along job performan
It can be noted that the overall satisfaction of 4.42 mean score, falls und
This indicates that the employees of both sexes perceive a positive attitu
enabling them to perform their duties very well.

The standard deviation obtained from the categories are 0.49 and 0.68 f
Data points close to one indicate a low variance in the sample set.

Moreover, it can be observed that the higher mean score of 4.62 was ob
This is described as very high satisfaction. This can imply that the men ar
and job performances.

On the other hand, in can be noted the lower mean is 4.22 from the peo
it still falls under the high satisfaction category. This can imply that fema
with their working conditions. However, such difference might imply tha
performance than the ladies of the organization.
 M F

4.62 Mean 4.22

0.156205 Standard Error 0.215922
4.9 Median 4.3
5 Mode 3.6
0.493964 Standard Deviation 0.682805
0.244 Sample Variance 0.466222
-1.212424 Kurtosis -0.914593
-0.86177 Skewness -0.462401
1.2 Range 2
3.8 Minimum 3
5 Maximum 5
46.2 Sum 42.2
10 Count 10
1 1

Performance when grouped according to Sex Range Descriptive Equivalent Rating

SD 4.51 – 5.00 Very High
0.49 3. 51 – 4.50 High
0.68 2. 51 – 3.50 Moderate
1.51 – 2.50 Poor
1.00 – 1.50 Very Poor

mployees along job performance when grouped according to sex.

of 4.42 mean score, falls under the high satisfaction category.
exes perceive a positive attitude in terms of the mechanisms that the organization provide

ategories are 0.49 and 0.68 for the males and females respectively.
ance in the sample set.

er mean score of 4.62 was obtained from the males category.

his can imply that the men are more satisfied with their working conditions,

er mean is 4.22 from the people female division. Although lower in value,
ory. This can imply that female employees are still satisfied
h difference might imply that gentlemen have better view on their work
 Equivalent Rating
ery High
High
Moderate
Poor
ery Poor
 Job
Work Experience
Performance

9 5 0-10 Years 10.1-20 Years 20.1-30 Years 30+ Years

5 3.6 3 5 5 4
6 3.6 4 5 4
11 5 4.6 4.6 5
2 4.6 4.8
3 4.6 5
2 4.8 4.6
3 4 4
4 5 5
0.8 4 3.6
8 3.8 3.6
9 4.8 3.8
16 5 5
17 4.6 4.8
39 4
2 5
44 5 0-10 Years 10.1-20 Years
33.5 4
25 5 Mean 4.2923076923 Mean
0.5 3 Standard Error 0.1834364064 Standard Error
Median 4.6 Median
Mode 5 Mode
Standard Devia 0.661389369 Standard Devia
Sample Varianc 0.4374358974 Sample Varianc
Kurtosis -0.8827994656 Kurtosis
Skewness -0.5473252436 Skewness
Range 2 Range
Minimum 3 Minimum
Maximum 5 Maximum
Sum 55.8 Sum
Count 13 Count
1
Table 1
Level of Satisfaction of Employees along Job Performance when grouped according to Working Experience
Groups Mean DER SD
0-10 years 4.29 High 0.66
10.1-20 years 4.87 Very High 0.23
20.1-30 years 5.00 Very High #DIV/0!
30+ years 4.33 High 0.58
Overall Mean 4.62 Very High
Interpretations:
Table 1 shows the level of satisfaction of employees along job performance when grouped according to working exp
It can be noted that the overall satisfaction of 4.62 mean score, falls under the very high satisfaction category.
This indicates that the employees of perceive a positive attitude in terms of their working performance.

The standard deviation obtained from the categories ranges from 0.23 and 0.66 .
Data points close to indicate a low variance in the sample set, with 0.23 from the 10.1-20 years working experience

Moreover, it can be observed that the highest mean score of a perfect 5 was obtained from 20.1-30 years working e
This is described as very high satisfaction. This can imply that the employees working for the orgnization for these a
are more satisfied with their working conditions, and job performances.

On the other hand, in can be noted the lowest mean of 4.29 is obtained from the people working the shortest.
Although lower in value, it still falls under the high satisfaction category. This can imply that the employees who hav
organization that much are still satisfied with their working conditions.
 10.1-20 Years 20.1-30 Years 30+ Years

4.866667 Mean 5 Mean 4.333333

0.133333 Standard Error 0 Standard Error 0.333333
5 Median 5 Median 4
5 Mode #N/A Mode 4
0.23094 Standard Deviat #DIV/0! Standard Devia 0.57735
0.053333 Sample Varianc #DIV/0! Sample Varianc 0.333333
#DIV/0! Kurtosis #DIV/0! Kurtosis #DIV/0!
-1.732051 Skewness #DIV/0! Skewness 1.732051
0.4 Range 0 Range 1
4.6 Minimum 5 Minimum 4
5 Maximum 5 Maximum 5
14.6 Sum 5 Sum 13
3 Count 1 Count 3
1 1 1

Working Experience Range Descriptive Equivalent Rating

4.51 – 5.00 Very High
3. 51 – 4.50 High
2. 51 – 3.50 Moderate
1.51 – 2.50 Poor
1.00 – 1.50 Very Poor
ped according to working experience.
h satisfaction category.
ng performance.

20 years working experience having the least variance.

rom 20.1-30 years working experience.

or the orgnization for these amount of time

e working the shortest.

that the employees who haven't served the
 Work Turnover
Experience Intention
9 4.6 0-10 Years 10.1-20 Years 20.1-30 Years 30+ Years
5 3.6 3.2 5 5 4
6 4 3.4 5 4
11 5 4.4 4.2 4.6
2 4.4 4.6
3 3 5
2 4.6 3
3 4.2 4.2
4 5 5
0.8 3.4 3.6
8 4 4
9 4.6 4
16 5 4.6
17 4.2 4.6
39 4
2 5
44 4.6 0-10 Years 10.1-20 Years
33.5 4
25 5 Mean 4.1230769231 Mean 4.733333
0.5 3.2 Standard Error0.1833288506 Standard Error 0.266667
Median 4.2 Median 5
Mode 4.6 Mode 5
Standard Devia 0.661001571 Standard Devia 0.46188
Sample Varian 0.4369230769 Sample Varian 0.213333
Kurtosis -1.031471028 Kurtosis #DIV/0!
Skewness -0.351966559 Skewness -1.732051
Range 2 Range 0.8
Minimum 3 Minimum 4.2
Maximum 5 Maximum 5
Sum 53.6 Sum 14.2
Count 13 Count 3
1 1

Table 1
Level of Satisfaction of Employees along Turnover Intention when grouped according to Working Experience
Groups Mean DER SD
0-10 years 4.12 High 0.66
10.1-20 years 4.73 Very High 0.46
20.1-30 years 5.00 Very High #DIV/0!
30+ years 4.20 High 0.35
Overall Mean 4.51 Very High
Interpretations:
Table 1 shows the level of satisfaction of employees along turnover intention when grouped according to working e
It can be noted that the overall satisfaction of 4.51 mean score, falls under the very high satisfaction category.
This indicates that the employees of perceive a positive attitude in terms of their working performance.
based on their working experiences.

The standard deviation obtained from the categories ranges from 0.35 and 0.66 .
Data points close to indicate a low variance in the sample set, with 0.35 from the 30+ years working experience hav

Moreover, it can be observed that the highest mean score of a perfect 5 was obtained from 20.1-30 years working e
This is described as very high satisfaction. This can imply that the employees working for the orgnization for these a
are more satisfied with their working conditions, and job performances resulting to low chance of leacing the compa

On the other hand, in can be noted the lowest mean of 4.12 is obtained from the people working the shortest.
Although lower in value, it still falls under the high satisfaction category. This can imply that the employees who hav
organization that much are still satisfied with the organization, with minimal chance of looking for a new one.
 20.1-30 Years 30+ Years

Mean 5 Mean 4.2

Standard Error 0 Standard Error 0.2
Median 5 Median 4
Mode #N/A Mode 4
Standard Devia #DIV/0! Standard Deviat 0.34641
Sample Varian #DIV/0! Sample Varianc 0.12
Kurtosis #DIV/0! Kurtosis #DIV/0!
Skewness #DIV/0! Skewness 1.732051
Range 0 Range 0.6
Minimum 5 Minimum 4
Maximum 5 Maximum 4.6
Sum 5 Sum 12.6
Count 1 Count 3
1 1

rking Experience Range Descriptive Equivalent Rating

4.51 – 5.00 Very High
3. 51 – 4.50 High
2. 51 – 3.50 Moderate
1.51 – 2.50 Poor
1.00 – 1.50 Very Poor
d according to working experience.
tisfaction category.
erformance.

working experience having the least variance.

20.1-30 years working experience.

e orgnization for these amount of time
nce of leacing the company.

orking the shortest.

the employees who haven't served the
ng for a new one.