India Strategy - Jan25
India Strategy - Jan25
* (with due apologies to the Rime of the Ancient Mariner): I read an amazing book recently “Material World”- Ed Conway, where he
explains in the Sand chapter how even though it is ubiquitous (Silicon= atomic no. 14, the most common solid element), each type
required for say construction, lenses, semiconductors, is different and may have to be imported from far far away. Eg desert countries
in the Gulf import construction sand from Belgium & Australia. Similarly, we curated the exact right sand from eclectic businesses here
7. Appendix 54
8. Valuation guide 60
Capital Markets
1. Markets, Why SMIDCaps
Institutional Equities
➢ Valuation: Midcap 150 and Small cap 250 at premium of 63% and 28% (vs. 5-year average premium of +34 and
discount of 6%) vs. NIfty; However, due to higher 2-year forward EPS CAGR of ~19% for Mid cap and ~18% for
Small cap vs. 12% for Nifty, PEG is at 1.2 for Midcap and 1 for Small cap vs. 1.5 for Nifty. As we near end of FY
25, this will seem more attractive. Of course there are pockets of severe valuation in certain Smidcap pockets
➢ Economic Transformation:
Growth areas: India has been driven by core sectors (BFSI, IT, Energy & Commodities) – as the economy
transforms, as can be seen in the breakup of capex and distribution of consumption and wealth, there are
many high growth non-core dimensions e.g. tier 3/ 4 towns, renewables/ EMS/ textiles/ realty/ consumer
services incl. digitalized ones/ tourism, various subsectors of cap goods; represented better by SMidCaps.
Ecosystem Control: With hard and soft infra (e.g. roads, e-infra, logistics) improving, the control of large
companies over their ecosystem (through captive infra like distribution and access to inputs like people/
finance/ markets) is decreasing, leading to many SMidCaps competing effectively.
➢ Medium term triggers which benefit SMidCaps relatively more:
New US regime likely to increase Indian status as “US+1”, i.e. complementary products and services to
MAGA (eg making “lagging edge” chips in India), benefiting manufacturing and exports. Tariffs on China and
chaos in Bangladesh also help some exports.
Input costs decreasing: Chinese slowdown + dumping on tariffs to decrease RM costs, Lower Energy costs as
renewable proportion increases.
Government capex to resume after pre-election hiatus.
PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL 8
… Why SMIDCaps remain attractive
➢ Vulnerability:
While cyclically, SMidcaps are more vulnerable to economic slowdowns (double whammy of revenues and
margins), STRUCTURALLY in India, there are many bottom-up entrepreneurial SMidCap plays whereas the
large caps are relatively more buffeted by global dynamics (BFSI, IT, Energy & Commodities).
Many SMIDCaps had governance issues earlier; with increasing valuations, now promoters more aligned to
market cap imperatives.
➢ Consolidation: GST introduction resulted in a virtual wipeout of many SMEs (45% of Industry, 40% of
workforce, 40% of exports) who were benefiting from lack of taxes. The effect of resulting consolidation is
likely to be greater in key SMidCaps.
➢ Alpha: Indian equity markets have the longest tail (no. of stocks) in the world – fund managers, to get alpha,
have a far larger set from small caps to choose from vs. large or midcaps, since SEBI definitions are based on
order of market cap rather than value, ie top 100 for largecaps, next 150 for midcaps (particularly difficult for
midcap fund managers to manoeuvre with such a small universe), & the rest for small caps.
➢ Flows & AUM: Given that SIPs are a third of gross MF inflows (anecdotally more in SMidCaps) and growing,
and that pure SMidCap schemes (excl. those included in thematic, multi cap, etc.) are a fourth of MF equity
AUM, money will continue to chase SMidCaps as long as the momentum remains.
PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL 9
India’s growth story: Powered by consistency and robust RoE
(%) (%)
20%
20%
18.4
16.4
14% 15.1 15.2
14% 16.2 14.0
15.2 13.8
14.3 12.6
11.3 11.5
12.0
10.4 8%
8%
6.3 6.8
2% 2%
(2.3) (3.0)
(4)% (4)%
10yr 5yr 2yr Fwd 10yr 5yr 2yr Fwd 10yr 5yr 2yr Fwd 10yr 5yr 2yr Fwd 10yr 5yr 2yr Fwd 10yr 5yr 2yr Fwd
Est. Est. Est. Est. Est. Est.
• India vs US: Earnings growth historically higher, immediate future slightly lower (but US growth dependent on new regime vs. continuity in India).
RoE marginally lower. US superiority in growth & RoE due to tech dominance. India’s multiple at 10% discount to US (vs. LT avg of 1% premium).
Tariffs & Currency Indian uncertainties
• India vs. EMs: Earnings growth historically higher but EM future growth higher due to low base & pivots on Chinese recovery. RoE ahead. Multiple
at 66% premium vs. 5-year average of 58%, justified by better RoE & consistent growth
Nifty-50 12m forward PE, premium/(discount) to US (S&P500) Nifty-50 12m forward PE, premium/(discount) to MSCI EM
(%) Nifty Prem/ (Disc) to S&P 500 LT Average (%) Nifty Prem/ (Disc) to MSCI EM LT Avg 5yr Avg
60% 100%
80%
40% 66
60% 58
20% 40% 41
LT average at 1%
20%
0%
0%
(20)%
(20)%
GFC Crises
Covid Pandemic
(40)% (40)%
Dec-06
Dec-09
Dec-12
Dec-15
Dec-18
Dec-21
Dec-23
Dec-24
Dec-07
Dec-08
Dec-10
Dec-11
Dec-13
Dec-14
Dec-16
Dec-17
Dec-19
Dec-20
Dec-22
Dec-13
Dec-14
Dec-15
Dec-16
Dec-17
Dec-18
Dec-19
Dec-20
Dec-21
Dec-22
Dec-06
Dec-07
Dec-08
Dec-09
Dec-10
Dec-11
Dec-12
Dec-23
Dec-24
Source: Bloomberg, DAM Capital Research
• India’s multiple trades at 10% discount to US (historically 1% premium). The only time it went below this level was during the GFC crises in 2008
and Covid-19 in 2020.
• Multiple vs. EMs at 66% premium vs. 5-year average of 58%, justified by superior RoE and resilient growth.
PEG Ratio
FY26E 1.5 1.2 1.0
Source: Bloomberg, DAM Capital Research
Note: The table above is based on free float methodology
SMIDCaps offer a steady balance between fundamentals (RoE), Growth and valuations
Nifty Midcap 150 12m forward PE, prem/(disc) to Nifty-50 Nifty Small Cap 250 12m forward PE, prem/(disc) to Nifty-50
Midcap P/(D) to Nifty (%) +1SD Smallcap P/(D) to Nifty (%) +1SD
Avg -1SD Avg -1SD
Last 5yr Avg Last 5yr Avg
35%
90%
28
25%
75%
15%
60% 62
5% 6
45% 45
(5)% -6
34
30% -9
29 (15)%
0% (35)%
(15)% (45)%
Apr-17 Apr-18 Apr-19 Apr-20 Apr-21 Apr-22 Apr-23 Apr-24 Apr-17 Apr-18 Apr-19 Apr-20 Apr-21 Apr-22 Apr-23 Apr-24
Earnings growth in SMIDCaps is expected to remain strong, with consensus estimates an EPS CAGR of ~19% for midcaps and
~18% for small caps over the next two years (FY24 to FY26)
19.6
4.0
20
19.2 3.5 3.0
3.0 3.1
16.2
15
2.6
2.5
13.2
2.2
2.0
10
1.5
5 1.0
Apr-06
Apr-07
Apr-08
Apr-09
Apr-14
Apr-15
Apr-16
Apr-21
Apr-22
Apr-23
Apr-24
Apr-10
Apr-11
Apr-12
Apr-13
Apr-17
Apr-18
Apr-19
Apr-20
Apr-07
Apr-08
Apr-09
Apr-12
Apr-13
Apr-17
Apr-18
Apr-21
Apr-22
Apr-06
Apr-10
Apr-11
Apr-14
Apr-15
Apr-16
Apr-19
Apr-20
Apr-23
Apr-24
Source: Bloomberg, DAM Capital Research
Nifty-50's forward PE is slightly above +1SD, while PB multiple is just below +1SD. Estimated EPS CAGR by consensus for the
next two years (FY24 to FY26) is ~12%. Sustaining these valuation levels will require strong earnings growth.
SIP collections vs. MF gross inflows MFs equity schemes AUM CAGR (Mar-19 to Nov-24)
MF Gross Inflow (Rs bn) SIP Collection (Rs bn)
Avg Monthly SIP Collection (Rs bn - RHS) Small Cap 43%
600 24
Sectoral/Thematic 43%
Focused 28%
200 8
Value funds/Contra 24%
ELSS 19%
0 0
FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 Multi Cap 3%
(upto
Nov-24) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
Despite a broader market downturn, SMidCaps have shown greater resilience vs. large caps. While Nifty-50 fell by ~10%, both
Midcap-150 and Smallcap-250 saw a lower dip of ~7% from respective 52-week highs. Given that SMIDCaps form a sizeable
part of SIPs & MF equity AUM (~24%), and a favorable valuation vs growth, SIPs are likely to continue to favour SMIDCaps
Equity paper supply vs Nifty-50 performance Nifty-50 avg monthly return vs. bunching of equity paper supply
1.5% 1.3%
7,500 24% 1.1% 1.1%
1.0% 0.9%
Nifty Performance
6,000 12%
0.5%
4,500 0%
0.0%
3,000 (12)%
(0.5)%
1,500 (24)%
(0.7)%
(1.0)%
> $5 bn $3 to $2 to $1 to $500mn <$500mn
0 (36)%
$5bn $3bn $2bn to $1bn
Jan-08
Jan-09
Jan-10
Jan-15
Jan-16
Jan-17
Jan-22
Jan-23
Jan-24
Jan-05
Jan-06
Jan-07
Jan-11
Jan-12
Jan-13
Jan-14
Jan-18
Jan-19
Jan-20
Jan-21
Money Raised
Source: Prime Database, Bloomberg, DAM Capital Research
Note: Equity paper supply includes, IPO, FPO, OFS, QIP, Rights and Institutional Placement
• Whenever equity paper supply activity cumulatively crosses USD 5bn in any month, Nifty-50 falls.
• With pipeline of ~USD 30bn in next 12 months (approved IPOs ~USD 3bn, IPO awaiting approval ~USD 11bn and QIP
announced ~USD 16bn) as of 20th Dec’24. However, bunching of paper could put pressure on the Nifty. Refer appendix for
key issuances.
Source: Bloomberg, DAM Capital Research. Notes: 1) Above aggregates unweighted & based on Consensus ests. 2) Top-10 high growth sectors and PEG ratio < 1 highlighted in GREEN
• Appendix provides list of high growth stocks based on consensus PAT estimates of FY26 in Large & SMid Caps
• High growth sectors across market cap are Auto Ancillary, Capital Goods, Cement, Construction, Consumer
Durables, Realty, Retail
PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL 17
Investment Banking
Capital Markets
2. Slowdown: Consumption & Capex
Institutional Equities
➢ GoI turned populist: 15 states have introduced income transfer programs for adult women (recent: MH, JH, MP, KA, BR)
bringing total annual spending to >Rs 2tn (0.7% of GDP), 3x the amount planned for FY24. These programs benefit 34% of
women in the states (<=> 20% of women overall).
➢ Note: Avg monthly per capita consumption in FY24 Rural: Rs4,122| Urban: Rs. 6,996 w/o considering values of freebies.
➢ Monsoon normalisation
➢ Expect Easing of rates & unsecured lending norms in mid-2025
➢ Structural factors:
Non agri employment increasing (5Y wage CAGR at 12% for non agri vs. 9.5% agri), leading to reduced demand for
MGNREGA jobs (demand lower by 20L jobs so far vs last 2Y).
Increasing penetration of distribution, financialisation, digitalization.
Convergence of wage growth with urban (FY15-FY22 CAGR of 10.6% Rural vs. 8.7% Urban) leading to reverse migration to
rural (increase in physical infrastructure leading to enhanced rural mobility)
Decline in rural poverty vs. urban poverty (Rural FY24: 5%, FY23: 7%, FY12: 26%; Urban FY24: 4%, FY23: 5%, FY12: 14%),
leading to decline in consumption inequality
➢ FICCI-Quess report (highlights why urban would lag rural):
Real wage growth during 2019-23 in urban areas was lower than 5.7% average inflation (highlights lower urban wage
elasticity, mobility towards urban led to dampening of wage growth).
TDS collections from salaries have reduced YoY, while advanced taxes have increased. This typically indicates higher business
income than salaries. Company profits not passed on as salary hikes.
Apr-21
Apr-22
Apr-23
Apr-24
Dec-20
Aug-21
Dec-21
Aug-22
Dec-22
Aug-23
Dec-23
Aug-24
Dec-24
Rs 10 tn (Note: GoI is considering relaxation of quarterly spending limits
to ensure it does not fall short of its capex target)
Source: Bloomberg, DAM Capital Research
Govt cash balance avg ~Rs 1.5 tn in Dec/ Rs 1.0tn in Nov/ Rs 2.9 tn in
Oct/Rs 3.2 tn in Sep. Expect sharp run-down in Q4FY25 Below trend capex spend in 7MFY25
Fiscal deficit expected at 4.8% (-10bps)
➢ FY26:
Exp Capex at ~Rs 12 tn (20%YoY)
Fiscal deficit at 4.5%, but expect reorientation from revenue spending
(lower MGNREGA & petro/ fertilizer subsidy)
➢ Rs100 tn infra plan just announced, to rollout over 5Y (Centre+ state+ pvt).
Expressways: Rs 20 tn
Port infra: Rs 2 tn
Rail network/ Vande Bharat upgrade: Rs 10- 12 tn Source: Bloomberg, DAM Capital Research
Roads: Rs 2.1 tn through BoT model
➢ FY 25 suffered due to electoral hiatus for govt capex, global Booming IPO, Debt markets counter bank lending slowdown
uncertainty, demand slowdown Total corporate funding (Rs Tn, 12m rolling sum)
300
➢ Bloomberg’s corporate funding index (equity+debt+bank
250
credit+ECBs) shows 12M rolling sum increased 32% YoY in
Oct 24 to Rs 14+ tn, up from 13% YoY in Jun 24 200
150
➢ Firm financing changing to equity and corporate debt vs.
banks (tighter regulations, high rates, tighter liquidity) 100
50
➢ Equity fund raising at ~$17.8bn in CY 24 as of 6 Dec) & 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
~USD 31bn likely in FY26 Source: Bloomberg, DAM Capital Research
➢ RBI support likely in FY 26: Easing Rates & financing IPO boom seen extending into 2025
regulations to support demand recovery Proceeds raised (USDbn)
20
➢ Risk: Global uncertainties, incl. Trump’s policies
15
10
0
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Capex Expectations of NSE 500 (consensus) Capex announcements by sector in Q1-Q3FY25 refer appendix for company details)
USDbn % Share Industry Value of new project announcents in Q1-Q3FY25 (Rs bn)
(Rs bn)/% FY24 FY25E FY26E FY24 FY25E FY26E
Renewable electricity 989
NSE500 Total 7685 9201 9395 100 100 100
Oil & Gas 2930 2742 2777 38 30 30 Inorganic chemicals 734
Power 992 1427 1634 13 16 17 Passenger vehicles 635
Metals & Mining 1119 1477 1492 15 16 16 Refinery 614
Automobile/Auto Comp. 482 832 846 6 9 9
Conventional electricity 476
Telecommunication 533 630 681 7 7 7
Construction Materials 312 421 358 4 5 4
Other transport equipment & ancillaries 296
Healthcare 264 319 269 3 3 3 Housing construction 295
Services 163 241 216 2 3 2 Storage batteries 250
Capital Goods 153 199 215 2 2 2 Note: The shortlist was made by looking at top 20 new project announcements in Q1-Q3FY25.
IT 100 202 205 1 2 2 Source: CMIE, DAM Capital Research
Oil & Gas includes RIL whose capex is also in Telecom & Retail. Others: ONGC, IOCL
Power: NTPC, Adani Green, Tata Power
Metal: Tata Steel, Adani Ent., Hindalco, JSW Steel
Auto: Tata Motors, Maruti, M&M
Source: Bloomberg, DAM Capital Research
Capital Markets
3. Trump: India Impact
Institutional Equities
Economic Impact
➢ Tariffs, US Corporate rates, Make in USA, H1B visa tightening: But other factors more important here vs. potentially worse
effect on key other global economies. Note powers:
President's Power: Can decide on Tariffs and Immigration (H1B Visas) without Congress approval.
Requires Congress Approval: Corporate Tax Cuts and Fiscal Spending policies.
➢ USD/INR (FY26 Avg USD/INR: 86.50-87): Thus, status could lead to capital outflows and INR depreciation (India’s twin deficit
exacerbates impact of INR depreciation on itself, leading to vicious cycle)
➢ US Tariffs and Trade Impact: Global competitive currency devaluation, currency manipulator label. Impacted Sectors: Auto &
components (eg Bharat Forge), Jewelry, Electronics, Solar Modules, Textiles, Chemicals & Pharma (dependent on Chinese
imports for inputs and Yuan flux). US likely to use tariffs selectively in self-interest vs. blanket increases.
➢ China:
China’s Role in EM Flows: Competes directly with India for EM investments. Potential further stimulus to counter US tariffs
could improve China’s relative inflows position vs. India. But India part of EM basket
Depreciation of CNY: Likely 10-15% depreciation vs. USD to mitigate tariffs, triggering global currency devaluation, including
INR (& delaying interest rate cuts required to spur growth).
Disinflation in China: Dumping Chinese goods into India, affecting sectors like Solar PV Cells, Steel, Chemicals, Textiles,
Pharma. Thus, India’s challenge in difficulty in proving dumping.
➢ IT: AI LLM Application work to us, US IT Budget increase as Presidential uncertainty removed + localization +
reduced US corporate tax + US Govt spend for cost-rationalisation, Fed Rate Cuts.
Corporate Tax Cuts benefit Indian IT subsidiaries also.
Infosys and Wipro less affected by potentially tighter H1B visa rules due to greater localization.
➢ Commodities (Metals, FMCG Inputs): Chinese growth, global currency devaluation, end of Ukraine war, end of
Gaza easing logistics costs.
➢ Pharma: Drug patent expirations more critical than impact of China tariffs, Bio secure law to help CDMOs,
Healthcare cost-savings related US laws benefit us.
➢ Oil:
Global Refinery Shutdowns in 2024 to raise GRMs.
US will export own oil to Europe, buying own needs from Saudi, as US refineries less efficient at processing
local oil.
Capital Markets
4. Economic Overview and Risks
Institutional Equities
➢ Domestic: Passthrough of higher RM costs (agri, food, S&P Global HSBC PMI Survey
metals) as demand picks up MANUFACTURING
PMI Index
Apr-24 May-24 Jun-24 Jul-24 Aug-24 Sep-24
2
Oct-24
5
Nov-24
2
Output 2 5 2
➢ Inflation expectations: A large share of HH in New Orders 2 5 2
New Export Orders 2 5 5
November view 1Y ahead inflation to be higher due Input Prices 5 5 5
Output Prices 2 5 5
to food, housing Future Output index 2 5 5
➢ Key mitigator: Intrinsic China deflation+ Yuan Business Expectations of Select Parameters - (%)
Parameters Q2 FY25 Q3 FY25 Q4 FY25 Q1 FY26
depreciation- led price competitiveness of Chinese Overall Business Situation 45 47 54 53
exports Production 36 36 51 50
Order Books 35 33 47 49
Capacity Utilisation 29 30 47 46
Rate View: Frontloaded rate cut cycle, of cumulative Employment 16 18 28 30
75bps. Rate cut cycle to start in February. Cost of Raw Materials -51 -48 -46 -46
Selling Prices 17 17 29 30
➢ Rupee’s fall: From 84 to 85 in 2M; 83 to 84 in 14M; 82 to 83 USDINR is 8% overvalued; possibility of faster depreciation is high
in 10M (cost to hedge INR exposure rises for offshore Actual USDINR Implied Fair Value of USDINR
95
investors) 90
90
➢ FY26 USDINR:86.50-87.0 (FY25:84) 85
80 85.07
Interest rate differentials favor dollar (~200 bps) 75
70
Safe haven dollar demand (Trump policies, China
65
slowdown, global uncertainty, geopolitics, growth 60
differential in favor of US vs other DM/EM) 55
50
Rise in goods trade deficit worsens CAD to 1.4% of GDP
Jun-14
Jun-23
Dec-13
Dec-14
Jun-15
Dec-15
Jun-16
Dec-16
Jun-17
Dec-17
Jun-18
Dec-18
Jun-19
Dec-19
Jun-20
Dec-20
Jun-21
Dec-21
Jun-22
Dec-22
Dec-23
Jun-24
Dec-24
despite assuming oil price to avg USD70 pb (FY25:1.2%
of GDP). Higher services exports to cushion any
The rise of US10Y above 4.5% signals stronger dollar for longer!
downside risks.
As per REER index, the fair value of rupee is 90. Rupee
is overvalued by >8%.
RBI would allow for rupee depreciation and start a
shallow rate cut cycle in February 2025. Else the
window for rate cut would close soon.
➢ US10Y move above 4.5% (key resistance), post Fed policy, is
critical. Sustaining above this brings 5% levels into play. This
simplistically implies, stronger USD, higher INR rates.
Risks Mitigation
➢ Monetary Policy: New RBI governor to balance Growth imperative vs. Tariff related (new US regime) effect on
Inflation & need to defend INR. Except frontloaded rate cut cycle to start in February 2025 (cumulative 75bps).
➢ GDP: Real GDP growth expected at 6.5% for both FY25 and FY26 (RBI: FY25: 6.6%, 1HFY26: 7.1%). GoI capex
and private consumption to be key driver of FY26 growth.
➢ Inflation: Expect CPI inflation to average 4.5% in FY26, after 4.8% in FY25. That said, volatility in inflation
would persist on account of food, imported inflation, passthrough of prices by businesses to end-consumers.
➢ Rates: Expect 75bps cumulative repo rate cut and durable liquidity injection by the RBI. CRR cut, OMO
purchases, VRRR/VRR, FX swaps would be ready instruments to manage liquidity mismatch. Lending standards,
risk weights to ease gradually through FY26 depending on balance sheet recovery of MFIs/ SFBs. We expect
10Y g-sec yields to tread towards 6.60% by March 2025 and towards 6.30% until March 2026 (assuming 75bps
rate cut).
➢ External balance: Expect CAD/ GDP at 1.2% for FY25 (oil price avg USD80) and 1.4% for FY26 (oil price:
USD70pb)
➢ INR: Post the November trade data, we expect the USDINR slide towards 85.50 by January/February 2025, with
RBI’s Fx intervention. For FY26, we expect 86.50-87 avg (assume 2.5-3% depreciation, LT avg:2%)
➢ Fiscal Deficit: With capex undershooting budget estimate (Rs1tn miss in our view), we expect fiscal deficit at
4.8% of GDP, 10bps lower than budgeted. Revenue shortfall on account of lower nominal GDP likely to offset
lower expenditure growth. For FY26, expect fiscal deficit at 4.5%.
Capital Markets
5. India Story: Uniquely Attractive, Transformations, Risks
Institutional Equities
➢ India’s Capex, Consumption, Investible sectors, etc are all more DISTRIBUTED vs. past & key economies
➢ Growth:
Highest GDP growth in the immediate term in a sclerotic world, but also structural demographic advantages
in an ageing globe
This brings forth a very striving and driven society, budding with entrepreneurship (Eg 3rd largest ecosystem
for startups)
US & India have given the highest equity returns over long periods
➢ Diversified:
Among the most diversified equity markets, providing both the comfort that no sectoral issues can roil
overall markets, and the benefit of investing in sectors of all preferences. Eg Bajaj Allianz Pure Stock fund
with no BFSI holdings (~35% of Nifty) returned ~24% vs. Nifty returns of 13% over 12 months.
This is so unlike even the US where big tech dominates or EMs where some commodities or chips or other
specific sectors dominate
➢ Stability:
Political (and hence policy) continuity is far more certain in India than almost anywhere else, with each
regime building on the previous, even as the globe is mired in political uncertainty with dramatic differences
in policies between parties.
Strong independent institutions, eg central bank, judiciary, various sector regulators, etc. – strong pillars
which withstand political vagaries – comparable to that of the West
➢ Near Term Challenges (Ref Economy section): Urban Consumption (HH leverage reached ~43% of GDP, near
previous retail credit cycle peak in 2008), partly driven by slowdown in Private Capex
➢ Impact of increased US Tariffs under new regime: Our major exports are Electronics, Solar modules, Pharma &
Specialty Chem, Jewelry, Textiles. However, with tariffs on China, our pharma/ chem exports where we
compete, could improve. Separately, we could become a US+1 secure friend-shore eg for “lagging edge” chips
➢ Vulnerability to USD appreciation: Twin deficit results in virtuous/ vicious cycles due to feedback loops in
flows/ inflation/ further currency impact, etc. as in 2007 vs. 2009. Geopol (risk-off/ Oil) & Fed rates affect INR.
Note counterintuitive relationship between Oil & Sensex: usually positively correlated as global demand buoys
both. Suck back of Flows to US in new regime due to US growth takeoff or risk-on can impact our twin deficit
➢ Dependance for strategic imports:
Oil forms a quarter of imports, while alternative solar energy currently dependent on Chinese equipment
(Adani & Ambani groups plan fully integrated H2 & solar)
Defense imports are 17% of global imports (Russia now accounts for only ~ 1/3 from over 2/3 historically).
India the only country in the world with 2 nuke-armed neighbors who have gone to war and a non-aligned
foreign policy. Our main arms supplier Russia can become an economic vassal of China (China blocks us in
every possible large economic move, eg Tesla’s entry in India). We are mitigating these by our Make in India
program, also leading to growing Defence exports, and higher Israeli & Western defence collaborations
Electronics (13% of imports) largely dependent on China, being mitigated by PLI schemes. CONTINUED …
➢ Unemployment leading Consumption slip: Huge numbers entering working age population + GST has shrunk
the unorganized sector (40% of workforce). HUGE population with low income (ref next slide). However:
Manufacturing thrust to absorb semi-skilled labour: PLIs for import substitution capacity creation, FDI esp.
in China+1 areas like electronics & chemicals, Ease of Doing Business improvement, Tenders prioritizing local
manufacture eg power equipment & defense
Thriving democracy (unpopular parties booted out), judiciary & media ensure social unrest doesn’t boil over
➢ Policy Implementation/ Ease of Doing Business: State domains (Labour, Land, electricity, agriculture) usually
difficult to reform & state finances are bad. Judicial delays, Logistics costs, State vs Centre issues, Tax base,
Industry clusters, etc.
➢ Disruption in various Sectors due to Technology & Distribution: FMCG & Retail (RIL entry), e-Consumer & e-
Finance, AI in IT, global use of robotics & mechanization in manufacturing, Renewables on thermal power eco
system incl. grid upgration, coal, etc, and on auto.
➢ Areas requiring global resolution: Uncompromising globe due to political polarization in key economies, which
affect us: climate change (India among most vulnerable to erratic monsoons, high temp & water scarcity), wars,
trade issues, funds flows & currencies (high debt/ GDP of West, risk on/ off)
➢ Increasing global volatility: Yen carry trade?, USD?, inflation resurgence- Interest rates due to tariffs, etc, algo
trades, commodity availability & pricing in both new & old eco.
Per Capita Avg Pre tax income ($ ‘000, 2023) Top 1% Bottom 99% Top 10% Bottom 90%
India 75.7 2.5 19.3 1.4
China 201.4 10.9 55.5 7.3
US 1,880 72.5 423.3 48.6
Kenya 53.4 2.9 16.6 1.7
Population (Mn, 2024) of above income baskets
Top 1% Indian income basket similar to US avg, bottom 99/ 90% similar to Ghana/ Pak & Zimbabwe, of pop same as China
➢ Manufacturing (strategic sector): Make in India Program and PLIs: esp. in electronics & tech, green energy,
steel, chemicals, defense. Domestic demand drives a lot of low-end manufacturing – sofas, umbrellas, low-end
electronics. Manufacturing is also about national security.
➢ Renewable Energy: govt target 43% of energy requirements by 2030: fully integrated investments in H2 &
Solar planned: will reduce energy import vulnerability and inflation, fertilizer subsidy
➢ Financialisation of the Indian economy (active investors to grow multifold): eg 1) wealth effect (1/3rd of
India’s wealth is coming out of NSE, $5.2-5.3tn), 20 cr investor accounts with 105 mn unique investor accounts
(India: 12% of population; China: 20% ; US: 60%), 14.4 mn are active (traded in past 1M as of Oct) 2)
Penetration of consumer lending thru NBFCs, apps, etc. 3) 95% of adults have a bank/ FI account.
➢ Digitalisation of Consumer Economy by India’s UNIQUE public utility IndiaStack model: From base of citizen
identifier based e-payments, direct subsidies and document storage, now onto a) consumer lending, b)
financial services like insurance, c) e-retailing d) digital health. AgriStack: >3.72mn farmers IDs created so far
(demography, land holdings, crops sown etc.)
➢ Discretionary Consumption boom as per capita GDP crosses $3000 benchmark: typically these spur auto &
consumer durables, realty, consumer services (hotels, restaurants), financial services. Eg 4% of bottom 20% of
population had some vehicles 10 years back vs 40% today (power of India’s domestic demand). Thus Vehicles +
Mobile telephony + Roads + Power + Financial penetration leading to a surge in Consumer demand. About
94.2% of rural HH/ 97.1% of urban HH possess telephone/mobile (NSSO).
➢ Major Infra push: dedicated freight corridor, expansion in ports/ airports, power, telecom
➢ Bottom up economy: Vs. top down central command economy of China. India’s Capex, Consumption and
Entrepreneurship are bottom up
➢ Domestic migration slowdown: No. of migrants as of 2023 is about 11.8% lower compared to 2011 Census
(availability of improved services- education, health, infrastructure, connectivity, improved economic
opportunities in or near major sources of migration.
➢ Inclusion in Bond EM Indices: JP Morgan EM bond index (Jun 24-Mar 25, attracts USD30bn bond inflows),
Bloomberg’s Emerging Market Local Currency Government Index (Jan-25, attracts USD5bn bond inflows) and
FTSE Russell EM Government Bond Index (Sep-25, phased over 6M; India’s wt:9.35%, attracts USD4-5 bn
flows). This eases capital requirements, boost Fx reserves, stabilize INR.
➢ Government Initiatives for semiconductor ecosystem: Semicon India Program’s incentives include an outlay of
Rs760bn with capital subsidies, and Design-linked Incentive with investment subsidy and deployment-linked
incentives
➢ Consumption: Tier 3-Tier 4 cities to drive consumption growth. Eg V-Mart, e-commerce sales. Shift from agri to
non-agri jobs in rural/semi-urban. Increased entrepreneurship opportunities to provide the income trigger.
Urban consumption governed by luxury or premiumization, highly dependent on macro conditions – inflation,
jobs, hike, wealth effect etc
➢ Capex: Newer pockets of capex – electronics, power distribution, renewables etc.
Capital Markets
6. Doubler Stocks
Institutional Equities
➢ CIFC was incorporated in 1978 as the financial services arm of the Murugappa Group. CIFC commenced business as an
Company equipment financing company and has today emerged as a comprehensive financial services provider offering vehicle finance
Profile (VF), home loans (HL), loan against property (LAP), SME loans, secured business personal loans (SBPL), consumer & small
enterprises loans (CSEL), loan against securities and a variety of other financial services to its customers.
➢ CIFC has a track record of fine execution for over a decade now. Despite being heavy on vehicle financing, which is subjected
to high cyclicality in growth, CIFC has been able to clock ~24% CAGR over FY10- FY20 (Pre-Covid decade).
➢ CIFC’s key strength lies in its ability to toggle between the sub-segments of Vehicle Finance (VF) based on the conduciveness of
each sub-segment. As a result, unlike its peers, CIFC does not heavily rely on any specific business line within its vehicle book.
It has posted ~26% CAGR on earnings over the last decade. Such sustained execution on growth with due focus on asset
quality is rare in the vehicle financing space.
➢ To reduce the dependency on vehicle finance, CIFC diversified into loan against property (LAP) and home loans (HL) in FY13
Key Drivers and further diversified into multiple new businesses post Vellayan’s come-back to CIFC as a Chairman.
➢ Current AUM mix consists of VF (56%), LAP (21%), HL (10%) and new business (13%). The execution on new businesses has
been remarkable, with total quarterly disbursements rising from Rs100bn in Q3 FY22, which was a record high at that time to
Rs243bn in Q2 FY25. The share of new businesses has been inching up fast, leading to depleting share of vehicle finance in
overall book.
➢ We expect AUM to grow in the range of ~25-28% while maintaining healthy RoEs of ~20-22% over FY25-FY27E. We expect
~35%+ earnings CAGR over FY25-FY27E.
➢ Slow down in the economic activity can impact sales of vehicles and thereby its financing. This can also lead to increase in
Key Risks credit cost for the company.
➢ New business is still at a nascent stage but growing rapidly. Asset quality in this segment will be a key monitorable.
➢ Entero is one of India’s largest and fastest growing organised pharmaceutical products distribution platforms with a network of
Company
95 warehouses used to cater to 79.5K pharmacies and 3.1K hospitals across 43 cities and 485 districts. The company has a
Profile
supply relationship with 2,300+ healthcare product manufacturers and handles over 71K SKUs.
➢ The Indian Pharma market is worth ~$26bn and is split across a fragmented supply chain of over 65K distributors with
organised players only accounting for 8% of the market (vs >90% in Developed Markets). We believe this space is ripe for
consolidation driven by decreasing power of AIOCD and its affiliates, representing a large opportunity for organised players.
➢ Entero, with its large scale of operations, well capitalized balance sheet, and a proven track record of execution is ideally
positioned to leverage this opportunity.
Key Drivers ➢ Since its inception, Entero has acquired and integrated 44 entities, all of which have delivered robust organic revenue since
their acquisition. Notably, Entero's inorganic strategy is aimed at shortening the timeline for scaling the company to a pan-
India level with a reach of 150-200K retailers. YTD, the company completed 9 acquisitions and added ~Rs7.5bn in annual
revenues with a couple of more in the pipeline to be closed by the year end.
➢ Between FY24E and FY27E, we expect Entero to achieve 2x its revenue driven by a strong deal pipeline with EBITDA/PAT set to
reach 4x/6x backed by procurement efficiencies, entry into higher margin adjacencies and operating leverage. Ex-Cash ROCEs
are expected to inch up to ~15% with long-term ROCEs of 25%+ as M&A pace drops.
➢ Industry consolidation: Consolidation by its customers, suppliers and competitors might reduce the number of market participants
and give the remaining enterprises greater bargaining power, which might lead to erosion in Entero’s profit margin.
Key Risks ➢ Capital intensive: The business requires significant amount of working capital as well as high amount of cash to fund
acquisitions for growth. Inability to maintain sufficient cash flow, credit facilities / other sources of funding could adversely
impact financials.
➢ Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd is a global research-led pharmaceutical company with presence across generics, specialty and
Company
OTC business with operations in over 80 countries. The company has a strong presence across branded formulations, with
Profile
domestic and EM branded generic businesses accounting for c.55% of its revenue.
➢ With the Rs56.5bn GLS stake divestment, GNP has decisively corrected its leverage issues.
➢ Barring the transient challenges in the US business, the other segments remain on a solid footing and continue to grow
strongly with a positive medium-term outlook underpinned by growth in specialty sales on the back of Ryaltris.
➢ The company remains positive on a turnaround in the US business backed by the launch of new products including gFlovent in
FY26E (Glenmark is FTF). The company is working on multiple strengths with the franchise cumulatively worth ~$1.6bn.
Key Drivers Further, the Monroe Injectables facility is expected to resume production in the coming months which should add to US sales.
➢ Additionally, recently, Glenmark’s R&D subsidiary, IGI, has shared a very promising initial data for its investigational oncology
drug ISB 2001. In our view, this creates significant possibility of out-licensing of ISB 2001 over the next few quarters - could be
a value unlocking event for the stock if this comes through.
➢ We expect the company to begin generating meaningful FCF from FY26E, with limited capex spends and improved OCF
generation.
➢ Regulatory challenges at facilities that supply to the US markets remain one of the key risks faced by Glenmark Pharma. The
resumption of USFDA inspections post COVID with an increased willingness to penalize shortcomings has been a major
Key Risks challenge for the India Pharma industry.
➢ India Pricing: Addition of drugs in the National List of Essential Medicines (NLEM) could hurt the domestic business.
➢ Greenlam Industries Ltd. (GRLM) is India’s largest (and a top 3 global) player in the laminates industry with a presence in
Company Veneers, Engineered Flooring/Doors and Plywood. Additionally, GRLM is set to enter the Particle Board space by Q4FY25E with
Profile a manufacturing setup in South India.
➢ Revenue break-up Q2FY25 – Laminates: 88% of revenue; Veneer and allied: 9% and Plywood: 3%.
➢ GRLM has been a sustained growth story (despite the ebb and flow in the wood panels space), moving up the value chain
while driving volume growth in its core business of laminates on the back of constant innovation (especially for the exports
markets).
➢ While GRLM should continue its dominance in the laminates, its foray into the high-growth category of particle board
(although at a high capex of ~Rs8bn) sets a platform for robust earnings growth from FY26E onwards.
Key Drivers
➢ The company’s core business growth consistency and reducing veneer+ margin drag should be able to support ramp up in its
new Plywood/Particle segment.
➢ Although near-term margins/RoCE will remain under pressure, new capacity ramp-up (esp. particle board = higher margin
profile) and subsequent debt reduction (low capex intensity in upcoming years) should drive ~3x EPS CAGR over FY25E-27E.
➢ Quicker ramp-up of Ply/PB units should drive a re-rating (or at least help hold on to premium multiples).
➢ Stretched balance sheet: Delay in debt repayment due to failure in the ramp-up of particle board capacity.
➢ Decline in exports: Near-term weakness due to freight / container unavailability is a minor blip but the resurgence of European
Key Risks
competition could be a major roadblock as GRLM has spent the last 3-4 years bolstering its value-additive sales in the exports
market.
➢ Headquartered in Mumbai, HomeFirst Finance commenced its operation in 2012 in the state of Gujarat and Tamil Nadu, and
Company
later expanded into other states. Of the total AUM of ~Rs112bn, ~68% of the AUM comes from salaried customers, with
Profile
product wise, pure home loans comprising ~85%.
➢ Stellar overall execution – HFFC continues to remain one of the few companies in the affordable space with strong and
sustained overall performance over the years through its superior tech-led capabilities. We continue to remain constructive on
the management’s capabilities for such sustained execution even in the subsequent years.
➢ Growth – The company has been growing at more than 30% over the past three years, and we expect it to grow at ~30% for
the next three years as well. The PMAY scheme is expected to contribute to the estimated growth of the company. The
structural demand for housing in the affordable space remains buoyant.
➢ Margins – Spreads have moderated in the past couple of years due to increase in cost of funds and currently stand at 5.1%. We believe
that the spreads and margins have bottomed-out and expect these to improve from hereon, aided by the recent rate hikes,
improvement in fee income, and LAP share inching-up in the over all AUM. We expect the spreads to be in the range of 5-5.25%.
Key Drivers ➢ Asset quality – The company’s strong execution, along with tech-led capabilities and strong underwriting, has enabled it to
maintain stable asset quality across cycles. GNPAs have remained below ~2% (except for FY22 due to Covid). In terms of
overall ECL provisioning, the company fares much better compared to its peers. With no exposure to developer loans and
relatively low share of LAP, we expect the asset quality to hold up going ahead as well.
➢ Excellent implementation on operating leverage – In terms of most operational/efficiency metrics, HFFC fares much better
than most of its peers. HFFC has reported a consistent improvement in efficiency ratios, such as AUM per employee and AUM
per branch, over the last few years.
➢ Return ratios – augmenting leverage RoAs to moderate to 3.3% (FY24:3.8%), while RoEs to inch-up to 19% (FY24:16%) by FY27E.
➢ The company has created a niche for itself in the affordable space through its differentiated operating model.
➢ Jindal Steel & Power Ltd (JSPL) is one of India’s leading steel producers with operations in steel manufacturing, mining, and
power generation, and a global presence across countries such as Australia, Mozambique, and South Africa.
➢ The company offers a diverse product portfolio, including high-value-added products such as high-tensile plates, rails, TMT,
Company and fabricated structures, with value-added products contributing 64% to revenue in FY24.
Profile ➢ JSPL is implementing a Rs31,000 Cr capex plan to expand steel capacity to 15.9 MTPA by FY27, alongside investments in
renewable energy and green hydrogen projects to reduce coal dependency by 50% in the next 2-3 years.
➢ With strong backward integration in raw materials, JSPL has significantly reduced its reliance on Australian coking coal, while
maintaining its focus on debt optimisation and achieving a net debt-to-EBITDA ratio below 1.5x.
➢ JSPL is set to increase its capacity from 9.6mt to 15.9mt over the next two years, with strong volume growth expected to
continue, supported by a healthy balance sheet, making it the least leveraged among major steel players and best positioned
to announce the next phase of growth.
➢ Additionally, JSPL is ramping up production from its coal blocks and has applied for an extension of EC limits, which, once
granted, will further enhance coal security and help mitigate variability in coal costs during periods of shortages or e-auction
price spikes.
Key Drivers
➢ JSPL continues to focus on adding value-added product grades, making it more resilient to commodity price fluctuations, and
with the Angul expansion, it will achieve an improved finished product mix.
➢ We expect higher steel spreads in FY26 and FY27, while the near term (2HFY25) might see a gradual improvement. China steel
spreads are currently at a cyclical trough, and we anticipate medium-term recovery. Government measures, such as stimulus
packages and fiscal spending, could accelerate this improvement. For FY27, we have factored in the India HRC price of
Rs60,000/t, compared to Rs48,000/t at present.
➢ Regulatory risk: an increase in mineral taxes or an increase in export duty of steel/decrease in import duty of steel.
➢ Execution risk : Delay in execution of expansion projects may lead to volume miss on our projected numbers.
Key Risks
➢ Pricing: A slowdown in global economy and further deterioration of China property, leading to steel prices staying lower for longer.
➢ Inflation: Cost inflation in terms of coking coal supply disruptions, or a sharper rise in domestic iron ore prices for JSPL.
➢ MMFS is one of India’s leading non-banking finance companies focused on the rural and semi-urban sector. The company
Company
primarily operates in the business of financing purchase of new and pre-owned auto and utility vehicles, tractors, cars, CV/ CE
Profile
and SME financing.
➢ Growth - We expect the business assets to grow at ~20% for the next three years. Brighter outlook of its OEM, which
constitutes ~43% of the vehicle financed by MMFS, adds comfort to our growth estimates.
➢ Margins - The company’s margins have reduced meaningfully from 7.1% in FY22 to 6.4% in FY24 (6.3% in Q2FY25) on account
of increase in cost of borrowings. We believe that the margins have bottomed out and expect them to improve from hereon
when the rate cut begins, coupled with structural improvement in other income as the company has forged tie-ups with
insurance partners.
➢ Asset quality - Asset quality has seen a considerable improvement, from peak overall stress of ~35% at the end of Q1 FY22 to
Key Drivers ~10.3% in Q2FY25. Following the arrival of Raul Rebello and due focus of the current group MD, there has been a substantial
change in the collection efforts with dedicated workforce formed for all overdue buckets (30+, 60+ and 90+). Also, focus on
relatively affluent customer base within the rural space is expected to result in less swings in credit cost, ensuring steady
return ratios going ahead.
➢ Further as we enter normalised macro, it will result in lower LGDs (loss given default) requiring lower provisions (even with
same level of stress) and hence the credit cost.
➢ Taking into consideration the above, we expect the earnings to grow ~27% over FY25-27E with an uptick in RoAs to ~2% (from
1.7% in FY24).
➢ PCBL Limited, a key entity of the RP-Sanjiv Goenka Group, is India’s largest and the world’s 7th largest producer of carbon
black, specialising in tyre, performance, and specialty black. Operating five facilities and global R&D centers in India and
Company Belgium, PCBL plans to expand its capacity to >1 MnMTPA over the medium term (currently at 770KTPA).
Profile ➢ The acquisition of Aquapharm Chemicals positions it among the top 3 global leaders in phosphonates and gives an opportunity
to tap into the Water treatment, Detergent and Oil and Gas products.
➢ JV with Kindia Pty Ltd. drives nano-silicon innovation for EV batteries – with a planned infusion of $44mn over the next 2 years.
➢ Rs35bn capex over the next five years across three initiatives – expanding carbon black capacity to over 1 mn tonnes, double
Aquapharm’s capacity and infusion in the new JV for nano silicon products (to acquire Ips, pilot plant and commercial scale).
➢ Target CAGR of 10–11% for sales volumes, supported by specialty chemicals doubling in size by FY29 (global CB demand
expected growth rate at 3.6% CAGR; the Indian tyre industry expected growth rate at 7-8%).
➢ Increase in the share of exports to the EU (with ban on Russian imports and limited Chinese competition) and higher
Key Drivers contribution from non-tyre CB to drive profitability/kg.
➢ Focus on increasing market share and moving up the value chain with green chelates and polymers.
➢ Development of silica-based nano additives for anodes to enhance battery capacity and reduce charging time, targeting 65%
gross margins and 50% EBITDA margins; positioned to capitalise on EV battery market growth.
➢ Anticipates generating ~Rs95-100bn over the next five years, with cash flows increasing annually due to higher capacity and
sales volumes. This cash will support growth initiatives and debt reduction.
➢ Concentration risk: High dependency on tyre and auto sectors poses risks, with systemic challenges potentially impacting
demand significantly.
Key Risks ➢ Raw material volatility: CBFS price fluctuations, linked to crude, may affect EBITDA/ton if costs are not fully passed through
➢ Slow capex ramp-up : Potential ramp-up may face delays, with underutilisation/shutdowns impacting the PnL.
➢ Headquartered in Delhi, PNB housing commenced its operation in 1988. PNB Housing is a trusted name in the housing finance
Company
sector, offering a range of Home Loan and related financial products. It has a total AUM of Rs747bn, of which 98% is retail
Profile
(housing + LAP) and the remaining is corporate exposure. Current long-term rating stands at AA+ (stable).
➢ We believe that the company has found the right leadership in Mr. Girish Kousgi for a potential turnaround who can drive the
retail focus and create an effective collection infrastructure. His stint at CanFin is a testimony of his ability to protect asset
quality and then push the paddle on growth in a conducive setting.
➢ With the company focusing on affordable and emerging markets and expansion led growth in sight, we expect the AUM to
grow at a CAGR of ~17-18% over FY25-FY27E. AUM mix by FY27E – Prime (60%), emerging segment (25%) and affordable
segment (15%).
➢ The company’s cost of funds being lower than Homefirst / Aavas, its ability to price the loans will be better (thereby attracting
better asset quality) and hence we believe it has the right to win in the affordable segment.
Key Drivers ➢ Corporate/Developer NPA now stands NIL in a book which now accounts for ~2% of the overall AUM. Credit cost for FY25 to be
near zero with recoveries from written-off pool (corporate and retail both). Post FY25, we expect normalised credit cost of
30bps.
➢ The depleting stress pool has resulted in rating upgrade, while focus on affordable and emerging segments would lead to
improvement in margins, thereby ensuring healthy profitability. Additionally, several key structural changes in underwriting
would ensure much lower volatility from inferior asset quality, similar to the past.
➢ We expect the company to clock ~17-18% growth CAGR with RoAs of ~2.3-2.5% over FY25-FY27E. We believe that the stock is
currently trading at an attractive valuation of ~1x. With visible improvement in the company’s performance, we expect the
multiple to re-rate to ~1.5x-1.6x on sustained execution.
➢ Any slowdown in the economic activity will hamper growth and thereby earnings.
Key Risks ➢ Any lapses in execution in the newly forayed segment of affordable and emerging segment will impact margins , growth and
earnings.
➢ Radico's transformation from a bulk spirits manufacturer to a leading premium IMFL player is a notable success in the Indian
spirits industry. Starting in 2006 with the launch of Magic Moments Vodka, now India’s best-selling vodka and a global leader,
Company
its premiumisation journey gained momentum in 2016 with the introduction of Rampur Indian Single Malt Whisky. Over past
Profile 15 years, Radico has built a robust premium portfolio, driven by consumer demand and supported by 20+ new brand launches
which straddle across price points.
➢ Radico’s P&A volumes have been growing at 2x the industry, with top end of its portfolio growing even faster. Continued thrust
on building a luxury and premium portfolio (through brands such as Rampur and Sangam in whisky and Jaisalmer in Gin) would
enable improvement in realisation per case and robust growth in the P&A category. We expect 12.6% CAGR in P&A volumes
over FY24-27E.
➢ UP's economic boom is expected to drive liquor premiumisation, positioning Radico, with its robust infrastructure, extensive
reach, and diverse portfolio across price points, to benefit significantly. UP contributes ~25-30% of its revenue.
Key Drivers
➢ Recent policy changes, including excise duty rationalisation in Karnataka, liquor policy favouring private players in Andhra
Pradesh, and clearance of payment overdue in Telangana are further expected to boost volume growth.
➢ We expect 368 bps improvement in EBITDA margin over FY24-27E driven by stabilising RM inflation, improving contribution of
P&A segment and higher operating efficiencies. PAT is expected to grow at ~34% CAGR over FY24-27E.
➢ Improving operating cash flows, stable working capital and no significant capex requirements will aid the company turn net
cash positive by FY27E.
➢ Exposure to state-specific policies and frequent regulatory changes poses operational and compliance challenges, with
potential impacts on revenue and profitability.
Key Risks ➢ Volatility in the prices of key inputs such as ENA and packaging materials could exert pressure on margins.
➢ A highly competitive market, characterised by the presence of domestic and international players, may limit pricing flexibility
and market share expansion.
➢ RMKF has emerged as one of the top five large, integrated forging companies offering in-house machining capabilities in
Company Eastern India. It primarily caters to OEMs and tier‐1 auto‐component suppliers in the commercial vehicle (CV) segment. RMKF
Profile has a sizable exports base with presence in the North American and European markets. The exports segment has recorded a
35% revenue CAGR over FY20-24. As of Q2FY25, the exports business accounted for ~43% of its total revenue.
➢ We believe that the new product launches, expansion into new product segments with castings, and a healthy pipeline in both
existing CV markets and potential markets such as EV and passenger vehicles (PV), coupled with market share gains, would
drive a double-digit volume growth over the next 2-3 years.
➢ We expect the JV with Titagarh Wagons to be a key growth driver, as it has already secured two sizable orders. The JV is
expected to continue being the preferred partner for railway components in both domestic and international markets.
➢ New order wins of ~Rs15bn, along with the potential orders for assembly bogies for the Vande Bharat train, are encouraging.
Key Drivers
These potential order wins from the Vande Bharat train would present a significant opportunity.
➢ The scalability potential from the recently acquired subsidiaries is expected to make a significant contribution to both the
topline and the bottom line over the next 2-3 years.
➢ The company operates at a healthy EBITDA margin of 20%+, and the higher exports and non-auto mix, turnaround of
subsidiaries, margin expansion in Multitech Auto Pvt Ltd (MAPL) as well as casting business are expected to further enhance
overall consolidated profitability.
➢ Sharda Cropchem specializes in marketing and distributing agrochemicals and non-agrochemicals (conveyor belts, chemicals,
dyes, etc) globally, focusing on identifying off-patent molecules, securing product registrations, and outsourcing formulation
manufacturing, primarily from China
Company
➢ It has a strong global distribution network (operating in 80+ countries) supported by 525 third-party distributors and 500+
Profile
sales personnel
➢ Experienced management with the leadership having over 30+ years experience in chemicals, agrochemicals and related
businesses.
➢ Asset-light business model with a strong balance sheet focused on identifying scalable generic molecules, securing global
product registrations and outsourcing manufacturing - primarily from China.
➢ With Chinese manufacturers looking to increase their dominance in the global generic agrochemical market, we believe
Sharda is well placed to leverage the lower priced supplies emanating from China unlike other Indian peers which rely on
Key Drivers domestic manufacturing.
➢ Company has already built a critical mass in EU and is strengthening its presence across other regions .
➢ This asset light business model based on cost competitive Chinese sourcing, combined with significant investments in global
registrations and distribution, has created a long growth runway and should reflect in a strong profitability growth over FY24-
27E (~EBITDA CAGR of 68%).
➢ Registration Delays: Delays in obtaining registrations for new products could impact revenue, especially during peak seasonal
demand.
Key Risks
➢ Currency risk: Sharda’s majority sales are Euro denominated while its RM sourcing is largely in USD terms- this exposes it to
forex MTM risk emanating from any volatility in USD EUR exchange rates.
➢ Strides is a pharmaceutical company based out of Bengaluru with a focus on generic exports. The company derives over 80%
Company
of its revenue from formulation exports to developed markets with US being the largest market. The company also has a
Profile
smaller Emerging Markets piece which comprises a small tender business in Africa and a Branded Generics business.
➢ Strides’ strategy of prioritising profitability/cash generation over revenue growth, backed by strong execution, differentiates it
from Indian generic peers and has created a solid platform for steady and profitable growth.
➢ Going forward, we expect the US/ORM businesses to be the primary growth drivers with a revenue CAGR of 13%/15% backed
by new launches from a large, approved product basket. Investment in differentiated platforms such as controlled substances
and nasal sprays adds to its long-term growth visibility.
Key Drivers ➢ We est Strides’ base business (ex-soft gel) to deliver revenue/EBITDA CAGR of 13%/24% between FY24 and FY27E, and
ROE/adj. ROCE to increase to 18%/21% from 11/13% with potential for further upgrades driven by new launches.
➢ The steady scale-up in OCF, combined with limited organic capex requirements, will lead to meaningful free cash flow
generation (expect FCF of Rs15.4bn exSoft Gel between FY25E and FY27E).
➢ Over this period, we expect the company’s net debt position to improve from ~Rs22bn in FY24 to Rs10.5bn in FY27E, after
accounting for the Rs2.8bn pushdown to OneSource as part of the Soft Gel business.
➢ Deterioration in US Generics market: 50% of the company’s revenue is driven by generic formulation sales to the US. Any
deterioration in the market dynamics similar to FY22/23 could significantly impact profitability.
Key Risks ➢ Currency fluctuation: The company is exposed to currency fluctuation risk, arising primarily from its business presence in
multiple foreign countries. The entire revenue is from exports and hence any adverse movement in the currency rate will
impact overall profitability.
➢ TVS Motor Company (TVSL) is the flagship company of the TVS Group and is the third largest two-wheeler (2W) manufacturer
Company
in India with an annual sale of more than 4 million units. The company is gradually emerging as a key export engine, with
Profile
exports contribution rising from 16% in FY18 to ~25% in Q2FY25.
➢ A strong product portfolio and enhanced brand equity are expected to drive market share gains which, combined with the
trend of premiumisation, would lead to robust outperformance in the domestic markets. Meanwhile, a decent recovery in
exports would support volumes growth over the next 2-3 years.
➢ Green shoots of rural recovery, along with a normal monsoon, are expected to support volume growth in the domestic
markets going forward.
Key Drivers
➢ Given the higher contribution from the 125cc+ segment, increased exports and improved average selling price (ASP), we
believe that EBITDA margins would expand by >100bps from current levels over the next two years, which would be a key
trigger for a re-rating of the stock.
➢ The company is eligible for PLI incentives but has not accrued the benefit compared to its peers as of now. Upon accrual, this
amount would further support margin expansion and net profitability.
Capital Markets
7. Appendix
Institutional Equities
Capital Markets
8. Valuation Guide
Institutional Equities
Investments in securities market are subject to market risks. Read all the related documents carefully before investing.
Registration granted by SEBI and certification from NISM in no way guarantee performance of the intermediary or provide any assurance of returns to investors.
Details of Compliance and Grievance officer
Name: Rajesh Tekadiwala Tel No. 022 -4202 2584 Email Id - [email protected]
Rating System
Investment Ratings Expected returns (over 12-month)
Buy > =10%
Sell < -5%
Neutral <-5% to 10%