Exercises
Exercises
1 Free Response
A 1 storey building can be considered a SDOF system. Its top is displaced by means
of a hydraulic jack, the applied force is 90kN, and the measured displacement is
𝑥0 = 5.0mm.
The applied force is istantaneously released, so that the building oscillates in
free response, starting from initial conditions 𝑥(0) = 𝑥0 , 𝑥(0)
̇ = 0. Note that 𝑥0
is a maximum, as the velocity at time 𝑡 = 0 is equal to zero.
The maximum displacement after the irst cycle of oscillation is measured, and
it is found that 𝑥1 = 4.0mm, at time 𝑡 = 1.40s.
We want to determine the dynamical parameters of the system, and in partic‑
ular its damping ratio.
2𝜋 6.2832rad r𝑎𝑑
𝜔𝐷 = = = 4.488 .
𝑇𝐷 1.40s s
The logarithmic decrement equation, when written for two consecutive max‑
ima of the response, is
𝑥𝑛 2𝜋𝜁
log( )=𝛿= .
𝑥𝑛+1 1 − 𝛽2
𝛿
𝜁= = 3.54920237062%.
(2𝜋)2 + 𝛿2
1
𝑖 𝜔𝑖 (rad/s) 𝜌𝑖 (𝜇m) 𝜗𝑖 (deg) cos 𝜗𝑖 sin 𝜗
1 16.0 183. 15.0 0.966 0.259
2 25.0 368. 55.0 0.574 0.819
𝜁1 =3.55143992107%
𝜁2 =3.54919954758%
𝜁3 =3.54920237420%
𝜁4 =3.54920237064%
Of course, from an engineering point of view the result 𝜁1 = 3.55% is good enough.
2 Dynamic Testing
We want to measure the dynamical characteristics of a SDOF building system, i.e.,
its mass, its damping coef icient and its elastic stiffness.
To this purpose, we demonstrate that is suf icient to measure the steady‑state
response of the SDOF when subjected to a number of harmonic excitations with
different frequencies.
The steady‑state response is characterized by its amplitude,𝜌 and the phase
delay, 𝜗, as in 𝑥S𝑆 (𝑡) = 𝜌 sin(𝜔𝑡 − 𝜗).
E.g., we excite our stucture with a vibrodyne that exerts a harmonic force 𝑝(𝑡) =
𝑝0 sin 𝜔𝑡, with 𝑝0 = 2.224kN, and measure the steady‑state response parameters
for two different input frequencies, as detailed in table 1.
2
L
2𝜁𝛽
but the equation for the phase angle, tan 𝜗 = , can be substituted in the radi‑
1−𝛽2
cand, so that, using simple trigonometric identities, we ind that
𝑝0 1 1 𝑝0 cos 𝜗
𝜌= = .
𝑘 1 − 𝛽2 2
1 + tan 𝜗 𝑘 1 − 𝛽2
𝜔2
With 𝑘(1 − 𝛽 2 ) = 𝑘 − 𝑘 = 𝑘 − 𝜔2 𝑚 and using a simple rearrangement, we
𝑘/𝑚
have
𝑝0
𝑘 − 𝜔2 𝑚 = cos 𝜗.
𝜌
Substituting the data from table 1 into the previous equation for 𝑖 = 1, 2 we can
write, using matrix notation, a system of two algebraic equations in the unknown
𝑘 and 𝑚,
0.966
1 −162 𝑘 183×10−6 ,
= 𝑝 0.574
1 −252 𝑚 0
−6
368×10
that once solved gives us the values 𝑘 = 17.48 MN/m and 𝑚 = 22415 kg, while
the natural frequency is 𝜔 = 𝑘/𝑚 = 27.924rad/s.
Using the previously established relationship for cos 𝜗, we can write cos 𝜗 =
𝜌
𝑘(1−𝛽2 ) , from the equation of the phase angle (see above), we can write cos 𝜗 =
𝑝0
1−𝛽2
sin 𝜗, and inally
2𝜁𝛽
𝜌𝑘 sin 𝜗 𝑝0 sin 𝜗
= , hence 𝜁 = ,
𝑝0 2𝜁𝛽 𝜌𝑘 2𝛽
and substituting the values for, e,g„ 𝑖 = 1 gives 𝜁 = 15.7%. Substituting the values
for 𝑖 = 2 offers a result that is equivalent from an engineering point of view.
3
m
k c
𝛿
where 𝑦𝑔0 = max = 3.0cm, 𝛿 = 6.0cm being the maximum de lection measured
2
between the supports and the midspan.
The vehicle can be considered as a single mass, connected to the road surface
by a suspension system composed by a spring and a viscous damper . The stiffness
is 𝑘 = 225kN/m, and the damping ratio is 𝜁 = 40%.
It is required the maximum value of the total vertical displacement of the ve‑
hicle body at steady state.
4
The transmittance ratio, 𝑇𝑅, is de ined as
𝑦TOT 1 + (2𝜁𝛽)2
𝑇𝑅 = = = 1.647,
𝑦𝑔0 (1 − 𝛽 2 )2 + (2𝜁𝛽)2
so that the maximum displacement is
𝑦TOT = 1.647 × 3.0cm = 4.9371cm.
For 𝜁 = 0.0, 𝑇𝑅 is equal to?
1 1 + 𝑇𝑅
𝑇𝑅 = , hence 𝛽 = = 2.45
𝛽2 − 1 𝑇𝑅
deriving 𝜔𝑛 = (2𝜋𝑓0 )/2.0 = 102.64rad/s, and
𝑘total 1 90, 000 × 10, 527.6 MN
𝑘= = 𝑚𝜔𝑛2 = = 236.87
4 4 4 m
5
50
IE=0.00
45 IE=0.50
40 IE=0.60
IE=0.70
35 IE=0.80
IE=0.90
6
30 IE=0.95
25 IE=0.98