0% found this document useful (0 votes)
32 views2 pages

Module 2 - Assignment 1 - Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA) CLO-1

This document outlines the requirements for an Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA) assignment, including submission details for a Jupyter notebook, a PDF report, and a Google Colab URL. It also provides a rubric for grading based on report content, presentation quality, code quality, correctness, and inline documentation. The assignment is worth a total of 100 points and allows for unlimited attempts.

Uploaded by

abduladede5
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
32 views2 pages

Module 2 - Assignment 1 - Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA) CLO-1

This document outlines the requirements for an Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA) assignment, including submission details for a Jupyter notebook, a PDF report, and a Google Colab URL. It also provides a rubric for grading based on report content, presentation quality, code quality, correctness, and inline documentation. The assignment is worth a total of 100 points and allows for unlimited attempts.

Uploaded by

abduladede5
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Module 2: Assignment 1: Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA) CLO- 100 Points Possible

1
2/23/2025

In Progress
Attempt 1 Add Comment
NEXT UP: Submit Assignment

Unlimited Attempts Allowed

Details

Follow the guidelines in the Colab notebook (and don't forget to download and organize any companion data files accordingly)! 120 points possible

Remember that you should submit:

1. The Jupyter notebook containing your solutions (.ipynb file)


2. The PDF "report" (basically your Jupyter notebook with all plots, results, answers to questions, etc. in PDF format).
3. URL of your solution on Google Colab.

_________________________

colab notebook (https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1Cn2Dju2_5UzaosJyWBb2pQ1iGLQwNpwf?usp=sharing)

Data file: salaries.csv (https://palmbeachstate.instructure.com/courses/2416736/files/339368601?wrap=1)


(https://palmbeachstate.instructure.com/courses/2416736/files/339368601/download?download_frd=1)

View Rubric

CAP2751 Notebook Assignment Rubric

Criteria Points

Report Content Above Standard At Standard Below Standard Approaching


/30 pts
Quality Standard
Report is thorough, Report is appropriate and In parts, report is
includes appropriate and accurate and provides a appropriate and accurate Report is either
accurate information and representative overview and provides a inappropriate,
provides a complete of the process. representative overview significantly incomplete,
overview of the process. Minimums were met. of the learning process. or contains inaccurate
Minimums were met. Minimums were or were information about the
not met. topic. Minimums were
not met.
30 pts 18 pts 12 pts 0 pts

Report Presentation Above Standard At Standard Below Standard Approaching


/20 pts
Quality Standard
Report was presented Report was presented Report was occasionally
using excellent language, using above-average lacking in one or more of Report was severely
style, formatting, and language, style, the following aspects: lacking in one or more of
media (images, formatting, and media average language, style, the following aspects:
screenshots, plots). (images, screenshots, formatting, and media average language, style,
plots). (images, screenshots, formatting, and media
plots). (images, screenshots,
plots).
20 pts 12 pts 8 pts 0 pts
Code Quality Above Standard At Standard Below Standard Approaching
/15 pts
Standard
Source code is Source code is partially Source code is partially
completely consistent consistent with best consistent with best Source code is not
with best standards and standards and practices standards and practices consistent with best
practices in the field. in the field. Minimums in the field, but lacks standards and practices
Minimums were met. were met. quality assurance (QA). in the field. Minimums
Minimums were or were were not met.
not met.
15 pts 9 pts 6 pts 0 pts

Code Correctness Above Standard At Standard Below Standard Approaching


/30 pts
Standard
Source code is Source code is mostly Source code is mostly
completely correct. correct and occasional correct, but contains Source code is mostly
Minimums were met. mistakes are not critical. some serious mistakes incorrect. Minimums
Minimums were met. and/or omissions. were not met.
Minimums were or were
not met.
30 pts 18 pts 12 pts 0 pts

Inline Documentation Above Standard At Standard Below Standard Approaching


/5 pts
Standard
Source code Source code Source code is barely
documentation is documentation is mostly documented. Minimums Source code is mostly not
complete and complete. Minimums were or were not met. documented. Minimums
appropriate. Minimums were met. were not met..
were met.
5 pts 3 pts 2 pts 0 pts

Choose a submission type

Upload More

Choose a file to upload

or

Webcam Photo

Canvas Files

You might also like