0% found this document useful (0 votes)
138 views60 pages

Electromyography: Instrumentation, Assessment and Evaluation

Electromyography (EMG) is a technique used to record electrical activity in muscles, helping to assess muscle activation, injury, and neurological conditions. It involves various electrode types, including fine-wire, needle, and surface electrodes, each with specific advantages and disadvantages. EMG findings can indicate neuropathic or myopathic diseases, and proper electrode placement and signal processing are crucial for accurate results.

Uploaded by

muskan461asati
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
138 views60 pages

Electromyography: Instrumentation, Assessment and Evaluation

Electromyography (EMG) is a technique used to record electrical activity in muscles, helping to assess muscle activation, injury, and neurological conditions. It involves various electrode types, including fine-wire, needle, and surface electrodes, each with specific advantages and disadvantages. EMG findings can indicate neuropathic or myopathic diseases, and proper electrode placement and signal processing are crucial for accurate results.

Uploaded by

muskan461asati
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 60

Electromyography

(EMG) :- Instrumentation,
Assessment and Evaluation
EMG Measures
 Movement involves electrical
activity in the muscles
 Electrodes detect electrical
activity
 Electromyography (EMG) =
Recording of muscle electrical
activity
 Common use is to determine
when a muscle begins and ends
activation
 EMG is fractionated as an index
of movement preparation
EMG Studies
 An extension of the Physical Examination
 Quantitates muscle injury
 Provides Useful Data Regarding Injury
 Site
 Type
 Severity
 Duration
 Prognosis
EMG
 EMG: assess physiology of muscle
 Neurologic consultation is best obtained
when testing is ordered
 If EMG normal or non-contributory,
justification for neurologic consultation is
greater than before testing
When to order NCSs and
EMG
 Mononeuropathy  Diffuse neuropathies
 Mononeuropathy  Cranial
Multiplex neuropathies
 Radiculopathy  Neuromuscular
 Plexopathy (Brachial Junction Disorders
or Lumbosacral)  Myopathy
 Anterior Horn Cell
Disorders
When Not to order NCSs and
EMG
 Central Nervous System Disorders (Stroke,
TIA, Encephalopathy, spinal cord injury)
 Multiple Sclerosis
 Total body fatigue, fibromyalgia
 Joint pain
 Unexplained weakness (without a neurologic
consultation)
 Failed back, S/P multiple neck and low back
surgeries
 In place of a neurologic consultation
TYPES ELECTROMYOGRAPHY-
EMG
Raw EMG

Full wave
Rectify

Linear
Envelope

Integrate over
contraction
Research Applications of
Surface EMG

 Indicator for muscle


activation/deactivation
 Relationship of force/EMG signal
 Use of EMG signal as a fatigue index
Types of EMG
 Electrode Categories
 Inserted
 Fine-wire (Intra-muscular)
 Needle

 Surface
Fine-wire Electrodes
 Advantages
 Extremely sensitive
 Record single muscle activity
 Access to deep musculature
 Little cross-talk concern
 Disadvantages
 Requires medical personnel, certification
 Repositioning nearly impossible
 Detection area may not be representative of entire
muscle
Surface Electrodes
 Advantages
 Quick, easy to apply
 No medical supervision, required certification
 Minimal discomfort
 Disadvantages
 Generally used only for superficial muscles
 Cross-talk concerns
 No standard electrode placement
 May affect movement patterns of subject
 Limitations with recording dynamic muscle activity
Needle Electromyography:
Techniques

 Needle electrode is inserted into the muscle


 Needle is disposable, single use
 Multiple muscles are accessible for examination
 Combination of muscles tested
 Dependent upon clinical question
 Level of discomfort is mild
Needle Electromyography:
Data

 InsertionalActivity
 Spontaneous Activity
 Motor Unit Configuration
 Motor Unit Recruitment
 Interference Pattern
Needle Electromyography:
Data
 Motor Unit Configuration
 Single motor unit: A motor axon and all its muscle
fibers
 Motor Unit Configuration: Amplitude, Duration, Morphology
 Muscle is volitionally activated at different force levels
 Needle recording properties enable assessment of single MUs
 Motor Unit Recruitment
 Pattern of motor unit activation with increasing volitional
activation
 Interference Patterns
 Motor unit pattern with full voluntary activation
 Needle EMG findings suggestive of
denervation include:
 fibrillations,
 positive sharp waves, and
 giant motor unit potentials (MUP).
EMG
Motor Unit Changes
Single Fiber EMG
Myasthenia Gravis
What to Expect From an
EMG Report

A clinically and physiologically relevant


interpretation/diagnosis
 An outline of the localization, severity,
and acuity of the process
 Notation of other diagnoses that are
detected/excluded
 Explanation of any technical problems
 Neuropathic disease has the following
defining EMG characteristics:
 An action potential amplitude that is
twice normal due to the increased
number of fibres per motor unit because
of reinnervation of denervated fibres
 An increase in duration of the action
potential
 A decrease in the number of motor units
in the muscle (as found using motor unit
number estimation techniques)
 Myopathic disease has these defining
EMG characteristics:
 A decrease in duration of the action
potential
 A reduction in the area to amplitude
ratio of the action potential
 A decrease in the number of motor units
in the muscle (in extremely severe
cases only)
Electrode Comparison Studies
 Giroux & Lamontagne - Electromyogr. Clin.
Neurophysiol., 1990
 Purpose: to compare EMG surface
electrodes and intramuscular wire
electrodes for isometric and dynamic
contractions
 Results
 No significant difference in either isometric or
dynamic conditions
 However: dynamic activity was not very
“dynamic”
Electrode Placement
 Away from motor point
 MUAP traveling in opposite directions
 Simultaneous (+) & (-) AP’s
 Resultant increased frequency components
 More jagged signal

 Middleof muscle belly is generally


accepted
EMG Electrode Placement
Electrode Placement
 Away from tendon
 Fewer, thinner muscle fibers
 Closer to other muscle origins, insertions
 More susceptible to cross-talk
 Away from outer edge of muscle
 Closer to other musculature
 Orientation parallel to muscle fibers
 More accurate conduction velocity
 Increased probability of detecting same
signal
Surface Electrode Placement
EMG - Force Relationship:
Isometric vs. Isotonic
Contractions
Rectification
 Translates the raw EMG signal to a
single polarity (usually positive)
 Facilitates signal processing
 Calculation of mean
 Integration

 Fast Fourier Transform (FFT)


Rectification - Types
 Full-wave  Adds the EMG
signal below the
baseline (usually
negative polarity) to
the signal above the
baseline
 Conditioned signal is
all positive polarity
 Preferred method
 Conserves all signal
energy for analysis
Rectification - Types
 Full-wave  Deletes the EMG
 Half-wave signal below the
baseline
Rectification - Types
Raw EMG

Full-wave
Rectified EMG

Half-wave
Rectified EMG
Delete
Integration
A method of quantifying the EMG signal
 Assigns the signal a numerical value
 Permits manipulation
 Calculation
⚫ Example: Normalization
 Statistical analysis
A form of linear envelope procedure
 Measures the area under a curve
Integration
Area Under a Curve

Units = mV - msec
Integration - Procedure
 EMG signal is  Full-wave rectified
 (Usually) lowpass
filtered
 5 - 8 (10) Hz
 Segment selected
 Integral read (mV-
msec [or secs])
Reference Electrode Placement
(Ground)
 As far away as possible from recording
electrodes
 Electrically neutral tissue
 Bony prominence
 Good electrical contact
 Largersize
 Good adhesive properties
General Concerns
 Signal-to-noise ratio
 Ratio
of energy of EMG signal divided by
energy of noise signal
 Distortion of the signal
 EMG signal should be altered as minimally
as possible for accurate representation
Characteristics of EMG Signal
 Amplitude range: 0–
10 mV (+5 to -5) prior
to amplification
 Useable energy:
Range of 0 - 500 Hz
 Dominant energy: 50
– 150 Hz
Characteristics of Electrical
Noise
 Inherent noise in electronics equipment
 Ambient noise
 Motion artifact
 Inherent instability of signal
EMG Noise
A form of artifact
 Interference with signal recording
 Obscures a “clean” signal
 Electromagnetic sources from the
environment may overlay or cancel the
signal being recorded from a muscle
 Especially problematic when the interfering
frequency is the same as being recorded from
muscle
⚫ Example: 60 Hz from power lines vs. 20 - 125 Hz
slow twitch motor units
Inherent Noise in Electronics
Equipment
 Generated by all electronics equipment
 Frequency range: 0 – several thousand
Hz
 Cannot be eliminated
 Reduced by using high quality
components
Ambient Noise
 Electromagnetic radiation sources
 Radio transmission
 Electrical wires

 Fluorescent lights

 Essentiallyimpossible to avoid
 Dominant frequency: 60 Hz
 Amplitude: 1 – 3x EMG signal
Sources of Noise
(Interference)
 Driver amplifier  Swinging cables
 Electrodes  Especially if un- or
poorly-shielded
 Cable movement
artifact  “Swing frequency”
will probably be
under 10 Hz
 Slow twitch mu’s:
(20) 70 - 120 Hz
Motion Artifact
 Two main sources
 Electrode/skininterface
 Electrode cable

 Reducibleby proper circuitry and set-up


 Frequency range: 0 – 20 Hz
Inherent Instability of Signal
 Amplitude is somewhat random in
nature
 Frequency range of 0 – 20 Hz is
especially unstable
 Therefore, removal of this range is
recommended
Factors Affecting the EMG
Signal
 Factors – direct affect on signal
 Extrinsic – electrode structure and placement
 Intrinsic – physiological, anatomical,

biochemical
 Intermediate Factors – physical &
physiological phenomena influenced by
one or more causative factors
 Deterministic Factors – influenced by
intermediate factors
Factors Affecting the EMG
Signal
Maximizing Quality of EMG
Signal
 Signal-to-noise ratio
 Highest amount of information from EMG signal as
possible
 Minimum amount of noise contamination
 As minimal distortion of EMG signal as
possible
 No unnecessary filtering
 No distortion of signal peaks
 No notch filters recommended
 Ex: 60 Hz
Solutions for Signal Interruption
Related to Electrode and
Amplifier Design

 Differential amplification
 Reduces electromagnetic radiation noise
 Dual electrodes
 Electrode stability
 Time for chemical reaction to stabilize
 Important factors: electrode movement,
perspiration, humidity changes
 Improved quality of electrodes
 Less need for skin abrasion, hair removal
Differential Amplification
 Ambient
(electromagnetic)
noise is constant
 System subtracts
two signals
 Resultant difference
is amplified
 Double differential
technique
Electrode Configuration
 Length of electrodes
 of included fibers vs. increased noise

 Distance between electrodes


 Increased amplitude vs. misaligning electrodes,
Multiple motor unit action potentials (MUAP)
 Muscle fibers of motor units are distributed evenly,
thus large muscle coverage is not necessary
(De Luca).
 Usually 1 cm to 2 cm distance is maintained.
Cross-Talk
 Electrodes over an adjacent muscle
pick-up a signal via skin conduction

M1 M2
Cross-Talk
 Visuallyinspect a tracing (monitor or
printout) of a signal
 Ifthey have the same shape there is
probably cross-talk

Muscle 1

Muscle 2
Cross-Talk Fixes
 Check skin prep
 Check skin resistance
 Reposition electrodes
 Check reference (ground) electrode
 Move between electrode sets
 Use a narrower OC distance between
electrodes, if available
Sampling Rate
 Number of data points (cycles) collected
per unit of time - usually seconds
 Example: 1000 cps = 1000 Hertz (Hz)
 Anadequate sampling rate ensures that
what’s being recorded is truly
representative of the signal
Selecting the Sampling Rate
The “Two Times Rule”
 Analyzethe signal (or movement) and
determine the highest possible
operating frequency
 Example: motor unit frequency range =
(10) 70 - 250 Hz
 Double the top rate
 Sampling rate: 250 Hz x 2 = 500 Hz ~
1000Hz
Sampling at 1000 Hz
 For
data plotted on a graph sampled at
1000 Hz, each tic on the X-axis is
1msec

1000 msec
1 second
Phase Transition
 Visual assessment of phasic activity

1st 2nd 3rd


EMG “Pearls”
 Electrodiagnostic studies are a
supplement to, and not a replacement,
for the history and physical examination
 Electrodiagnostic results are often time-
dependent
 Electrodiagnostic studies are not
“standardized” investigations and may
be modified by the practitioner to
answer the diagnostic question
References
 Basmajian JV, De Luca CJ. Muscles Alive: their
functions revealed by electromyography (fifth ed.).
Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, Maryland, 1985
 Cram JR, Kasman GS. Introduction to surface
electromyography. Aspen Publishers, Inc.
Gaithersburg, Maryland, 1998
 De Luca CJ: Surface electromyography: detection
and recording. DelSys, Inc., 2002
 De Luca CJ: The use of surface electromyography in
biomechanics. J App Biomech 13: 135-163, 1997
 MyoResearch: software for the EMG professional.
Scottsdale, Arizona, Noraxon USA, 1996-1999
Koh, T.J., Grabiner, M.D. (1993). Evaluation and methods
to minimize cross talk in surface electromyography.
Journal of Biomechnics, 26(supplement 1), 151-157.

Karst, G.M., & Willett, G.M. (1995). Onset timing of


electromyographic activity in vastus medialis oblique and
vastus lateralis muscles in subjects with and without
patellofemoral pain syndrome. Physical Therapy, 75,
813-823

Hodges, P.W., & Bui, B.H. (1996). A comparison of


computer-based methods for the determination of onset
of muscle contractions using electromyography.
Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology,
101,511-519.

You might also like