FME 451 - Tutorial
FME 451 - Tutorial
Tutorial
Fracture Mechanics
1. What is the magnitude of the maximum stress that exists at the tip of an
internal crack having a radius of curvature of 2.5 × 10-4 mm and a crack
length of 2.5 × 10-2 mm when a tensile stress of 170 MPa is applied?
Solution
This problem asks that we compute the magnitude of the maximum stress
that exists at the tip of an internal crack.
Fatigue
1. A fatigue test was conducted in which the mean stress was 50 MPa and the
stress amplitude was 225 MPa.
(a) Compute the maximum and minimum stress levels. (σ𝑚𝑎x = 275 MPa, σmin =
−175 MPa)
(b) Compute the stress ratio. (𝑅 = −0.64)
(c) Compute the magnitude of the stress range (σ𝑟 = 450 MPa)
2. Cylindrical 1045 steel bar is subjected to repeated compression-tension
stress cycling along its axis. If the load amplitude is 22,000 N, compute the
minimum allowable bar diameter to ensure that fatigue failure will not
occur. Assume a factor of safety of 2.0. (𝐴𝑛𝑠: 𝑑0 = 13.4 𝑚𝑚)
Figure 1
3. An 8.0 mm diameter cylindrical rod fabricated from a red brass alloy (Figure
1) is subjected to reversed tension-compression load cycling along its axis. If
the maximum tensile and compressive loads are +7500 N and -7500 N,
respectively, determine its fatigue life. Assume that the stress plotted in the
figure above is stress amplitude.
Solution
4. A 12.5 mm diameter cylindrical rod fabricated from a 2014-T6 alloy (Figure
1) is subjected to a repeated tension-compression load cycling along its axis.
Compute the maximum and minimum loads that will be applied to yield a
fatigue life of 1.0 × 107 cycles. Assume that the stress plotted on the vertical
axis is stress amplitude, and data were taken for a mean stress of 50 MPa.
(Ans: 𝐹𝑚𝑎x = 25,800𝑁, 𝐹𝑚in = −13,500𝑁)
5. Explain five factors that may lead to scatter in fatigue life data.
Solution
Five factors that lead to scatter in fatigue life data are (1) specimen fabrication
and surface preparation, (2) metallurgical variables, (3) specimen alignment
in the test apparatus, (4) variation in mean stress, and (5) variation in test
cycle frequency.
6. The cold-drawn AISI 1040 steel bar shown in the figure is subjected to a
completely reversed axial load fluctuating between 28 kN in compression to
28 kN in tension. Estimate the fatigue factor of safety based on achieving
infinite life, and the yielding factor of safety. If infinite life is not predicted,
estimate the number of cycles to failure.
Solution
Since infinite life is not predicted, estimate a life from the S-N diagram. First,
find an equivalent completely reversed stress.
Creep
1. The following creep data were taken on an aluminum alloy at 400°C and a
constant stress of 25 MPa. Plot the data as strain versus time, then determine
the steady-state or minimum creep rate. Note: The initial and instantaneous
strain is not included.
Solution
The creep data plotted generate:
The steady-state creep rate (∆ε/∆t) is the slope of the linear region (i.e., the
straight line that has been superimposed on the curve) as
Solution
From the 815°C line in Figure 2, the steady state creep rate 𝜀𝑠̇ is about 5.5 ×
10-6 h-1 at 80 MPa. The steady state creep strain, 𝜀𝑠̇ , therefore, is just the
product of 𝜀𝑠̇ and time as
𝜀𝑠 = 𝜀𝑠̇ × (𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑒)
Finally, the total elongation is just the sum of this ∆ls and the total of both
instantaneous and primary creep elongations [i.e., 1.5 mm]. Therefore, the
total elongation is 20.6 mm + 1.5 mm = 22.1 mm.
Figure 3
(b) We are now asked to estimate 𝜀𝑠̇ at 600°C (873 K) and 300 MPa. It is
first necessary to determine the value of 𝐾2̇ , which is accomplished using
the first expression above, the value of Qc, and one value each of 𝜀𝑠̇ and T
(say 𝜀𝑠1̇ and T1). Thus
𝑄𝑐
𝐾2̇ = 𝜀𝑠1̇ exp ( )
𝑅𝑇1
Figure 4
Applications
3. Two thick steel plates are joined by an arc welding process as part of an
assembly for a missile-carrying transport vehicle. After the vehicle is
placed in service, the assembly fails. Inspection of the failure indicates that
the crack propagated through the heat affected area of the weld, right next
to the actual fusion zone. Suggest possible causes of the failure, including
the role of the welding process and the microstructure that the welding
process may have produced in the heat affected zone. What
recommendations might you have to avoid such failures in the future?
Solution
• When a steel is welded, the metal next to the fusion zone heats above the
A3 temperature and changes to austenite. Austenite grain growth may
occur. When the weld cools, the coarse-grained austenite may then
transform to martensite, making the heat affected zone very brittle.
Furthermore, if hydrogen is able to enter the heat affected zone, hydrogen
embrittlement and cracking can occur in the heat affected zone. When the
weld is overstressed, the weldment will fail in a brittle manner.
• Factors that might contribute to such a failure include (1) using a high
hardenability steel, so that martensite easily forms, (2) achieving high
cooling rates in the weld, encouraging the formation of martensite, and (3)
using welding processes that produce high cooling rates or introduce
hydrogen into the weld that might contribute to embrittlement.
• Recommendations for minimizing the problem include using low alloy, low
carbon steels (such as HSLA steels), preheating the base metal prior to
welding to reduce the cooling rates, postheating the weld to temper any
martensite that might form and also to reduce residual stresses that might
encourage cracking, using ductile filler metals to minimize residual
stresses (the stresses can be reduced by plastic deformation of the fusion
zone), and using welding processes that produce low hydrogen contents
(such as electron beam welding or inert-gas welding processes).