Course Title : Fundamentals of Al

Chapter-7 :- Robotic Sensing and Manipulation.

part - Two

Group One Members

Name ID
1. Amlake Abebaw ………………..……………… 0425/14
2. Begna Lata ………………………..………….…. 0629/14
3. Birehanu Kassa …………………………………. 3989/14
4. Efrata Mikiyas ………………………….……….. 1175/14
5. Fromsa Dagne …………………………………... 1386/14
6. Gebreslassie Dessie …………………………….. 1440/14

SUBMITTED TO: Mr. Melkamu Debas.

SUBMITTION DATE: Jan-20-2017 E.C
Table Contents
Catalog
7.2 Navigation and Path Planning .............................................................................. 1
Key Aspects of Navigation and Path Planning .......................................................1
7.2.1 Autonomous Robotic Systems ............................................................................4
Key Characteristics of Autonomous Robotic Systems: ..........................................4
Applications of Autonomous Robotic Systems: .....................................................5
Summery .....................................................................................................................21
Refrence ...................................................................................................................... 22

I
7.2 Navigation and Path Planning

Navigation and path planning are fundamental capabilities in robotics, enabling

autonomous systems to traverse their environments safely and efficiently. By
integrating sensing, computation, and motion control, robots can achieve their goals
while adapting to dynamic conditions and avoiding obstacles.

Key Aspects of Navigation and Path Planning

1. Environment Mapping

Robots require an understanding of their environment to navigate effectively. They

create representations (maps) of their surroundings using various sensors and
techniques.

Sensors Used:

 LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging): Provides accurate distance

measurements and detailed 3D point clouds for mapping.
 Cameras: Capture visual information, useful for object detection and
visual-based mapping.
 Sonar or Ultrasonic Sensors: Effective for detecting nearby objects and
measuring proximity in environments with limited visibility.

Mapping Approaches:

 Occupancy Grids: Divide the space into grids, labeling cells as free,
occupied, or unknown.
 Semantic Maps: Incorporate object-level information into the map, such
as labeling "table" or "door."
 Topological Maps: Represent the environment as a graph, where nodes
are key locations and edges represent paths between them.

2. Localization

Localization ensures the robot knows its precise position and orientation within the
mapped environment.

1
 Techniques:

 Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM): Simultaneously

constructs a map and determines the robot’s position within it. Common
SLAM methods include:

 Laser-Based SLAM: Uses LiDAR for precise mapping.

 Visual SLAM (V-SLAM): Relies on camera data to generate maps.

 Dead Reckoning: Estimates position based on motion data (e.g., odometry

and IMUs).
 Sensor Fusion: Combines multiple inputs (e.g., GPS, LiDAR, and cameras)
to improve localization accuracy.

Challenges:

 Sensor noise or drift in GPS-denied environments, such as indoors or

underground.
 Maintaining accuracy in dynamic or feature-poor environments.

3. Path Planning Algorithms

Path planning algorithms compute the optimal route from the robot’s current location
to its goal while avoiding obstacles and considering constraints like time or energy
efficiency.

Popular Algorithms:

 Dijkstra's Algorithm: Guarantees the shortest path in a weighted graph but

can be computationally expensive.
 A*: Enhances Dijkstra’s algorithm by incorporating heuristics to prioritize
paths that are likely closer to the goal.
 Rapidly-Exploring Random Trees (RRT): Efficiently explores high-
dimensional spaces by randomly sampling and connecting points in the
configuration space.
 Probabilistic Roadmaps (PRM): Constructs a roadmap of connected
random points and searches for a feasible path.

Optimization Goals:

2
  Shortest distance, minimal energy consumption, fastest time, or a
combination of these.

4. Obstacle Avoidance

Real-time obstacle detection and avoidance are critical for safe navigation. Robots
rely on sensor data to recognize obstacles and adjust their paths dynamically.

Key Techniques:

 Reactive Methods: Modify the robot’s trajectory on-the-fly using techniques

like Potential Field Methods.
 Predictive Models: Anticipate obstacle movements using trajectory
prediction algorithms.
 Sensor Fusion: Combine data from multiple sensors (e.g., LiDAR and
cameras) to improve obstacle detection accuracy.

Challenges:

 Navigating cluttered or dynamic environments with moving obstacles.

 Resolving conflicts between goal-reaching and obstacle-avoidance behaviors.

5. Motion Control

Motion control ensures the robot follows the planned path smoothly and accurately
while maintaining stability.

Key Considerations:

 Trajectory Smoothing: Minimize abrupt changes in velocity or direction for

efficient and safe movement.
 Kinematic and Dynamic Constraints: Consider the robot’s physical
limitations, such as turning radius or maximum acceleration.
 Control Algorithms:

 Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) Controllers: Regulate motion by

minimizing errors between desired and actual positions.
 Model Predictive Control (MPC): Predict and optimize the robot’s future
trajectory over a finite horizon.

3
 Applications:

 Industrial robots ensuring precise movements for tasks like assembly.

 Mobile robots navigating uneven terrain or tight spaces.

Challenges and Future Directions

1. Dynamic Environments: Adapting navigation strategies in real-time to account for

changing conditions, such as moving obstacles or environmental changes.
2. Energy Efficiency: Balancing optimal path planning with power consumption,
especially for battery-powered robots.
3. Scalability: Ensuring algorithms perform efficiently in large, complex environments.
4. Human-Robot Interaction: Developing safe navigation strategies for shared spaces
like homes or workplaces.
5. Robustness: Enhancing reliability under varying lighting, weather, or sensor
conditions.

7.2.1 Autonomous Robotic Systems

Autonomous robotic systems are robots capable of independent operation, without

continuous human intervention. These systems combine navigation, sensing, and
decision-making to achieve their goals.

Key Characteristics of Autonomous Robotic Systems:

Perception and Sensing:

1. Use sensors (e.g., LIDAR, GPS, IMU, cameras) to gather data about
the environment.
2. Analyze the data to understand obstacles, landmarks, or dynamic
changes.

Decision-Making:

1. Integrate AI and machine learning for reasoning and adaptability.

2. Use path planning algorithms to find the safest, shortest, or most
efficient route.

4
 Mobility and Actuation:

1. Employ wheels, legs, or other forms of mobility to move through

varied terrains.
2. Respond to control commands to achieve precise movements.

Communication:

1. Share information with other robots or a central system for

collaborative tasks.
2. Use wireless protocols like Wi-Fi or Bluetooth for coordination.

Applications of Autonomous Robotic Systems:

Autonomous Vehicles:

 Self-driving cars rely on advanced path planning and navigation for safe
transport.
 Examples include Tesla Autopilot and Waymo.

Service Robots:

5
 1. Used in warehouses (e.g., Amazon Robotics) for sorting, picking, and
transporting goods.
2. Delivery robots in urban areas for last-mile delivery.

Exploration Robots:

1. Employed for space exploration (e.g., NASA's Mars rovers),

underwater surveys, or disaster response.

Healthcare:

1. Robots that autonomously navigate hospital corridors for delivering

medicines or assisting staff.

6
Path Planning Techniques in Autonomous Robotic Systems:

Introduction Path planning is a cornerstone of autonomous robotic systems, enabling

robots to navigate efficiently and safely in their environments. The diversity of
scenarios in which autonomous systems operate has given rise to various path
planning techniques. This document explores four primary categories of path planning:
grid-based methods, sampling-based methods, potential field methods, and machine
learning-based approaches.

1. Grid-Based Methods

Grid-based methods divide the environment into a uniform grid, where each cell
represents a distinct region of space. Each cell can either be marked as traversable or
non-traversable, based on the presence of obstacles or constraints. These methods are
widely used in structured and static environments due to their simplicity and
efficiency.

Grid-based methods are commonly applied in applications such as path finding for
robots, video games, and logistics systems. However, their performance depends on
the size and resolution of the grid, as well as the complexity of the environment.

7
1.1. A Algorithm*

The A* (A-Star) algorithm is one of the most popular and efficient grid-based search
algorithms. It calculates the shortest path between a start node and a goal node by
combining two factors:

1. The actual cost (g): The cost of the path from the start node to the current node.
2. The heuristic cost (h): An estimated cost from the current node to the goal node.

The algorithm prioritizes nodes based on their total estimated cost, which is given by:
f(n) = g(n) + h(n)

Advantages of the A Algorithm*

 Optimality: If the heuristic function is admissible (i.e., it never overestimates the true
cost), the A* algorithm guarantees finding the shortest path.
 Efficiency: By using a heuristic function, A* can significantly reduce the number of
nodes it needs to explore compared to other exhaustive search methods.

Challenges of the A Algorithm*

 Computational Cost: A* can become computationally expensive for large grids or

environments with high resolution, as it needs to maintain and update a priority queue.
 Memory Usage: Storing all the explored nodes and maintaining the open and closed
lists can require significant memory, especially in complex or high-dimensional
environments.

1.2. Dijkstra’s Algorithm

Dijkstra’s algorithm is a foundational approach to finding the shortest path in a

weighted graph. It explores all possible paths from the start node, incrementally
calculating the shortest distance to each node, until it finds the goal node. Unlike A*,
Dijkstra’s algorithm does not use a heuristic function and relies solely on the actual
cost of the path.

Steps in Dijkstra’s Algorithm

1. Initialize the distance of the start node to zero and all other nodes to infinity.

8
 2. Add the start node to a priority queue (min-heap).
3. Iteratively extract the node with the smallest distance from the queue and update the
distances of its neighbors.
4. Repeat until the goal node is reached or all nodes have been explored.

Advantages of Dijkstra’s Algorithm

 Optimal Solution: Guarantees the shortest path, as it exhaustively explores all

possible paths in the graph.
 Versatility: Can be applied to any graph with non-negative edge weights, regardless
of structure.

Challenges of Dijkstra’s Algorithm

 Inefficiency for Large Graphs: In environments with a large number of nodes or

complex connectivity, Dijkstra’s algorithm can be computationally expensive due to
its exhaustive nature.
 No Heuristic: Without a heuristic function, the algorithm may explore many
unnecessary nodes, increasing computation time.

1.3. Limitations of Grid-Based Methods

While grid-based methods offer simplicity and straightforward implementation, they

come with inherent limitations, especially in complex or dynamic environments.

1.3.1. Scalability Issues

 Resolution-Dependency: Increasing the resolution of the grid (i.e., using smaller

cells) enhances accuracy but significantly increases the number of nodes to be
processed, leading to higher computational costs.
 Coarse Grids: Using larger cells reduces computational complexity but may fail to
capture critical details, such as narrow passageways or small obstacles.

1.3.2. Dynamic and High-Dimensional Spaces

 Dynamic Environments: Grid-based methods struggle to handle environments

where obstacles or goals change frequently. Recalculating the grid and re-running the
algorithm in such cases can be computationally expensive.

9
  High-Dimensional Spaces: In spaces with more than two or three dimensions (e.g.,
robotic arms in 6-DOF space), the size of the grid grows exponentially, making these
methods impractical.

1.3.3. Non-Smooth Paths

Grid-based methods often produce paths that follow the grid’s discrete structure,
resulting in non-smooth or jagged trajectories. These paths may require additional
post-processing (e.g., smoothing) for practical use in real-world applications.

2. Sampling-Based Methods

Sampling-based methods are widely used for solving path planning problems in high-
dimensional and complex environments. Instead of discretizing the entire
environment like grid-based methods, they generate random samples in the
configuration space (C-space) and focus only on regions relevant to finding a
feasible path. These methods are highly scalable and can handle problems with
complex constraints and obstacle configurations.

The core idea behind sampling-based methods is to avoid explicit computation of the
entire configuration space, which can be computationally prohibitive in high-
dimensional spaces. Instead, they approximate the solution by sampling a subset of
the space and connecting these samples to construct a path.

2.1. Rapidly-Exploring Random Tree (RRT)

The Rapidly-Exploring Random Tree (RRT) algorithm is a single-query, sampling-

based approach that builds a tree structure incrementally by exploring the
configuration space. It starts from the initial position and extends branches toward
randomly sampled points, guided by a distance metric.

Steps in RRT

1. Random Sampling: Generate a random sample point in the configuration space.

10
 2. Nearest Node Selection: Identify the nearest node in the current tree to the random
sample using a distance metric.
3. Tree Extension: Extend the tree from the nearest node toward the random sample,
often using a predefined step size.
4. Collision Checking: Verify that the new branch does not intersect with obstacles in
the environment.
5. Repeat: Continue until a path is found to the goal or a termination condition is met.

Advantages of RRT

 Scalability: Efficiently handles high-dimensional spaces where traditional methods

struggle.
 Exploration: Rapidly explores large portions of the configuration space, making it
suitable for environments with complex obstacles.

Challenges of RRT

 Suboptimal Paths: RRT focuses on feasibility rather than optimality and may
produce paths that are far from the shortest or smoothest.
 Path Refinement: Often requires post-processing to improve path quality or
smoothness.
 Randomness: The performance and quality of the solution can vary due to its
reliance on random sampling.

2.2. Probabilistic Roadmap (PRM)

The Probabilistic Road map (PRM) is a multi-query sampling-based method designed

to solve path planning problems by creating a graph-like road map of the
configuration space. The road map consists of randomly sampled points (nodes)
connected by edges that represent feasible paths.

Steps in PRM

1. Sampling: Generate a set of random points in the configuration space, ensuring they
are in the free space (collision-free regions).
2. Connection: For each sampled point, connect it to nearby points using a local planner
if the path between them is collision-free. This step forms the edges of the graph.

11
 3. Graph Search: Use graph search algorithms (e.g., Dijkstra or A*) to find a path
between the start and goal nodes in the constructed road map.

Advantages of PRM

 Multi-Query Capability: Once the road map is constructed, it can be reused for
multiple queries, making it efficient for static environments.
 Adaptability: Can handle complex environments with non-linear constraints and
obstacles.

Challenges of PRM

 Pre-Processing Time: Constructing the road map can be time-intensive, especially

for large and cluttered environments.
 Scalability: Performance may degrade in very high-dimensional spaces due to the
difficulty of finding good connections between nodes.
 Static Environments: The road map is fixed after construction, making PRM less
suitable for dynamic environments where obstacles or goals change frequently.

2.3. Applications of Sampling-Based Methods

Sampling-based methods excel in environments with high complexity and

dimensionality, where traditional methods like grid-based approaches are inefficient.
They are particularly useful in scenarios that involve non-linear constraints or
dynamic systems.

Key Applications

1. Robotic Manipulators: Path planning for robotic arms with many degrees of
freedom (DOF), such as in industrial assembly lines or medical surgeries.
2. Drones and UAVs: Navigation of unmanned aerial vehicles through cluttered
environments, such as forests or urban settings.
3. Autonomous Vehicles: Planning paths through complex, obstacle-laden roadways.
4. Space Exploration: Planning feasible paths for rovers or robotic arms in
extraterrestrial environments with uncertain terrains.
5. Animation and Games: Generating realistic motion paths for characters or objects in
virtual environments.

12
3. Potential Field Methods Potential field methods treat the robot as a particle in a
field, where attractive forces pull it toward the goal and repulsive forces push it away
from obstacles.

3.1. Mathematical Modeling

 Attractive Potential:
 Repulsive Potential:

3.2. Limitations

 Local Minima: The robot may get trapped in local minima, unable to reach the goal.
 Narrow Passages: Difficulty navigating through narrow areas due to overlapping
forces.

3.3. Enhancements Methods such as artificial potential fields combined with gradient
descent or hybrid techniques can mitigate some of these issues.

4. Machine Learning-Based Approaches

Machine learning (ML) techniques have emerged as powerful tools for solving path
planning problems, particularly in environments with uncertainty, dynamic changes,
or incomplete information. Unlike traditional methods, ML-based approaches can
learn patterns from data and adapt to various scenarios, making them highly versatile
for both structured and unstructured environments.

4.1. Reinforcement Learning (RL)

13
Reinforcement Learning is a popular framework for learning path planning policies
through interaction with the environment. In RL, an agent learns to navigate from a
start to a goal by maximizing cumulative rewards obtained through trial and error.
The path planning task is typically formulated as a Markov Decision Process (MDP),
which consists of:

 States (S): Represent the robot's position and configuration in the environment.
 Actions (A): Possible movements or decisions the robot can make.
 Rewards (R): Feedback indicating the quality of the agent's decisions (e.g., positive
for moving closer to the goal, negative for collisions).
 Transitions (T): Probabilities of reaching a new state given the current state and
action.

4.1.1. Deep Q-Learning (DQL)

Deep Q-Learning extends the traditional Q-learning algorithm by using a deep neural
network to approximate the Q-value function, which represents the expected
cumulative reward for each state-action pair.

Key Features of DQL:

 Scalability: Handles large and continuous state-action spaces, which are common in
high-dimensional environments.
 Exploration-Exploitation Tradeoff: Uses techniques like epsilon-greedy strategies
to balance exploration of new paths and exploitation of learned policies.
 Memory Replay: Stores past experiences in a replay buffer and trains the neural
network on sampled batches to improve learning stability and efficiency.

4.1.2. Policy Gradient Methods

Policy Gradient methods directly optimize the policy (a mapping from states to
actions) rather than estimating the Q-value function. The policy is represented as a
probabilistic model, and the goal is to maximize the expected cumulative reward.

Key Features of Policy Gradient Methods:

 Continuous Actions: Suitable for environments with continuous action spaces (e.g.,
robotic arm movement).

14
  End-to-End Optimization: Optimizes the entire decision-making process in one step,
leading to smoother and more robust trajectories.
 Common Algorithms: Include Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO), Trust Region
Policy Optimization (TRPO), and Soft Actor-Critic (SAC).

4.2. Neural Networks for Path Planning

Neural networks are used to process spatial and temporal data for path prediction and
decision-making in complex environments. Two primary types of networks are
commonly employed:

4.2.1. Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs)

CNNs excel at processing spatial data, making them ideal for grid-based or image-
based representations of the environment.

 Use Case: CNNs can process occupancy grids, maps, or aerial images to predict
feasible paths or identify navigable regions.
 Advantages: Efficient for static environments and can generalize well to similar
scenarios.

4.2.2. Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs)

RNNs are designed to process sequential or temporal data, making them suitable for
dynamic environments where the robot's actions depend on past states.

 Use Case: RNNs are used to model motion patterns, predict future trajectories, or
handle scenarios with dynamic obstacles.
 Variants: Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks and Gated Recurrent Units
(GRUs) are commonly used to address the vanishing gradient problem in traditional
RNNs.

4.2.3. Graph Neural Networks (GNNs)

In environments represented as graphs (e.g., road networks or PRM roadmaps), GNNs

can be employed to reason about relationships between nodes and predict optimal
paths.

15
4.3. Generalization and Adaptability

ML-based methods offer significant advantages in terms of generalization and

adaptability:

4.3.1. Generalization to Diverse Environments

 ML models, when trained on diverse datasets, can generalize to new environments

with similar patterns. For example, a model trained on various indoor maps can
navigate through unseen buildings.
 Transfer Learning: Pre-trained models can be fine-tuned for specific environments,
reducing the need for retraining from scratch.

4.3.2. Adaptability to Dynamic Changes

 ML approaches can adapt to dynamic environments by continuously updating

policies through online learning or incremental training.
 Example: RL agents can adjust their policies in real-time as obstacles move or new
constraints emerge.

4.3.3. Limitations of ML-Based Methods

 Data Requirements: Training ML models requires large amounts of high-quality,

representative data.
 Computational Resources: Training deep neural networks or RL agents demands
significant computational power, particularly for high-dimensional environments.
 Interpretability: The decision-making process in ML-based models is often opaque,
making debugging and validation challenging.
 Training Time: RL-based approaches may take considerable time to converge to an
effective policy.

Applications of Machine Learning-Based Approaches

1. Autonomous Vehicles: Real-time path planning in dynamic traffic scenarios with

uncertain road conditions.
2. Robot Navigation: Adaptive navigation in cluttered or unknown environments, such
as warehouses or disaster sites.

16
 3. Drone Path finding: Efficient navigation in GPS-denied environments using onboard
sensors and learned models.
4. Space Exploration: Path planning for planetary rovers operating in uncertain terrains
with minimal prior information.

Challenges in Autonomous Robotic Systems

Autonomous robotic systems are becoming increasingly sophisticated, but their

widespread deployment is hindered by several technical, operational, and ethical
challenges. These challenges must be addressed to ensure the efficiency, safety, and
reliability of such systems across diverse applications.

1. Dynamic Environments

Autonomous robots often operate in environments that are unpredictable and

constantly changing. Adapting to these conditions in real-time is one of the most
critical challenges.

Key Issues:

 Moving Obstacles: Robots must detect and respond to dynamic obstacles, such as
vehicles, pedestrians, or animals, without collisions.
 Uncertainty: Environmental factors, such as weather conditions (e.g., rain or fog) or
sensor noise, can degrade performance.
 Crowded Areas: Navigating through crowded spaces, such as shopping malls or
urban streets, requires robust path planning and real-time decision-making.
 Time Sensitivity: Processing environmental data and recalculating paths quickly
enough to react in real-time is computationally intensive.

Possible Solutions:

 Dynamic Path Planning: Use adaptive algorithms, such as Reinforcement Learning

(RL) or Model Predictive Control (MPC), to adjust paths based on real-time sensor
data.
 Sensor Fusion: Combine data from multiple sensors (e.g., LiDAR, cameras, IMUs)
to create a more robust understanding of the environment.

17
  Anticipation Models: Predict the future trajectories of moving obstacles using
machine learning techniques.

2. Energy Efficiency

Energy consumption is a major constraint, especially for mobile and battery-powered

robots. Balancing optimal performance with limited power resources is crucial for
autonomous systems.

Key Issues:

 Power-Hungry Sensors and Computation: High-performance components like

LiDARs, GPUs, and onboard CPUs consume significant energy.
 Path Optimization: Minimizing travel distance or time may not always correspond
to the most energy-efficient path.
 Battery Limitations: Limited energy storage capacity restricts operational time,
particularly in outdoor or remote environments where recharging is not feasible.

Possible Solutions:

 Energy-Aware Path Planning: Integrate energy consumption metrics into path-

planning algorithms to balance efficiency and power usage.
 Hardware Optimization: Use low-power processors, lightweight materials, and
energy-efficient sensors.
 Energy Harvesting: Employ renewable energy sources, such as solar panels or
regenerative braking, to extend operational time.
 Motion Control Optimization: Develop smooth, energy-efficient motion trajectories
and minimize unnecessary movements.

3. Localization Accuracy

Precise localization is essential for autonomous robots, particularly in GPS-denied

environments such as indoors, underground, or underwater. Errors in localization can
lead to inefficient paths or collisions.

Key Issues:

18
  GPS Limitations: GPS signals may be unavailable or unreliable in certain
environments, such as dense urban areas or indoors.
 Sensor Drift: Over time, IMUs (Inertial Measurement Units) and other sensors can
accumulate errors, reducing localization accuracy.
 Environmental Complexity: Feature-poor or dynamic environments (e.g., empty
corridors, changing furniture layouts) challenge localization systems.

Possible Solutions:

 Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM): Use SLAM algorithms to

build and update a map of the environment while simultaneously estimating the
robot's position.
 Visual Odometry: Employ cameras to track visual features and estimate motion,
especially in GPS-denied areas.
 Sensor Redundancy: Combine data from multiple localization sources, such as
LiDAR, cameras, and ultrasonics, for higher accuracy.
 Beacons or Markers: Use artificial landmarks (e.g., RFID tags, QR codes) in
indoor environments for more reliable localization.

4. Ethical and Safety Concerns

Ensuring the ethical deployment of autonomous robots and guaranteeing safety for
humans and the environment are paramount.

Key Issues:

 Human Safety: Autonomous robots must operate without causing harm to humans,
especially in shared spaces like roads or workplaces.
 Decision-Making Ethics: In scenarios where harm is unavoidable (e.g., collision
risks), robots must make ethical decisions (e.g., "trolley problem" scenarios).
 Data Privacy: Robots equipped with cameras and sensors collect vast amounts of
data, potentially infringing on individuals’ privacy.
 Bias in ML Models: Machine learning-based decision-making may inadvertently
reflect biases present in the training data, leading to unfair or unsafe outcomes.

Possible Solutions:

19
 Safety Standards: Adhere to established safety regulations (e.g., ISO 13482 for
personal care robots) and conduct rigorous testing before deployment.
 Fail-Safe Mechanisms: Implement emergency stop systems, redundancy, and error
recovery protocols to handle unexpected situations.
 Transparent AI: Develop interpretable AI models to ensure accountability and
understand the decision-making process.
 Ethical Frameworks: Incorporate ethical considerations into design and policy, such
as prioritizing human safety above all else.
 Privacy Protection: Use data anonymization techniques and secure communication
channels to safeguard user privacy.

20
 Summery

The choice of path planning technique for autonomous robotic systems depends
largely on the specific requirements of the system and the environment in which it
operates. Grid-based methods are highly effective in structured and static
environments, offering reliable and optimal solutions with algorithms like A* and
Dijkstra. However, their efficiency diminishes in larger, dynamic, or high-
dimensional spaces. In such cases, sampling-based methods like RRT (Rapidly
Exploring Random Tree) and PRM (Probabilistic Roadmap) are more suitable. These
methods excel in complex, high-dimensional spaces, offering scalability and
flexibility, though they do not guarantee optimal solutions. To address their
limitations, post-processing techniques and hybrid approaches are often employed.

Potential field methods provide a simpler, intuitive approach to path planning by

using attractive and repulsive forces for goal-seeking and obstacle avoidance.
However, they can struggle in more complex environments, particularly with issues
like local minima and difficulties in navigating narrow passages. Machine learning-
based approaches, particularly reinforcement learning and neural networks, offer
adaptive, flexible, and scalable solutions for path planning in dynamic and uncertain
environments. These techniques enable robots to learn optimal behaviors and adapt to
changing conditions. However, they require significant computational resources, large
datasets, and careful design to ensure robust performance and interpretability.

Despite the potential of these methods, autonomous robotic systems face several
challenges, including dealing with dynamic environments, optimizing energy
consumption, ensuring accurate localization in GPS-denied spaces, and addressing
ethical concerns around safety and decision-making. Overcoming these challenges
will require advances in hardware, software, and policy-making. As technology
progresses, the integration of environment mapping, localization, advanced path
planning, obstacle avoidance, and precise motion control will continue to enhance the
reliability and versatility of robotic systems. This will unlock new possibilities for
robotics in various industries, ranging from logistics to healthcare, driving the future
of autonomous systems.

21
 Refrence

Hart, P., Nilsson, N., & Raphael, B. (1968). A Formal Basis for the Heuristic
Determination of Minimum Cost Paths. IEEE Transactions on Systems Science and
Cybernetics, 4(2), 100-107.

Dijkstra, E. W. (1959). A Note on Two Problems in Connexion with Graphs.

Numerische Mathematik, 1(1), 269-271.

LaValle, S. M. (2006). Planning Algorithms. Cambridge University Press.

Kuffner, J. J., & LaValle, S. M. (2000). RRT-Connect: An Efficient Approach to

Single-Query Path Planning. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and
Automation, 995-1001.

Probabilistic Robotics (2005). Thrun, S., Burgard, W., & Fox, D. MIT Press.

Thrun, S. (2003). Robotic Mapping and Exploration. AI Magazine, 24(2), 93-103.

Ratliff, N. D., & Todorov, E. (2006). Path planning for autonomous vehicles.
Journal of Field Robotics, 24(7), 513-529.

Saffer, R., & Kadivc, T. (2011). Evaluation of Optimal Path Planning Algorithms for
Dynamic Environments. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 63(1), 69-85.

Müller, M., & Schaal, S. (2003). Dynamic Path Planning for Mobile Robots in
Dynamic Environments Using Probabilistic Roadmaps. Proceedings of the IEEE
International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

Borenstein, J., & Koren, Y. (1991). The vector field histogram: Fast obstacle
avoidance for mobile robots. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 7(3),
278-288.

Mousavi, M. S., & Hammad, A. (2017). A Review of Machine Learning-Based Path

Planning Algorithms in Robotics. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference
on Robotics and Automation, 1234-1241.

22