Mironowicz 1987
Mironowicz 1987
Solution of the problem of free and forced vibration of a discrete system with random
parameters, as a model of a machine foundation, is considered. Expressions for the
expected values and correlation functions of the solution are formulated, in terms of the
probabilistic characteristics of the structure, initial conditions and excitation, which are
assumed to be known. The stochastic linearization method is used. The solution is illustrated
by an example of a block foundation with random parameters.
1. INTRODUCTION
Vibration problems o f structures in which random factors are involved have been exten-
sively studied, with the randomness being most often assumed to be introduced by the
Ioadings [1-4]. However, in a few papers the random character of structural parameters
has been taken into account [5, 6]. The sensitivity o f the system dynamic response to
changes in its parameters depends on the kind of load. It is less in the case of random
wide band excitation and greater for deterministic harmonic excitation, as it is then
possible for resonance to occur [7].
The parameters o f a machine foundation are often subject to random variations, of
technological, operational and structural causes. Foundation dynamic analysis thus can
be improved by taking them into account.
In what follows the vibration of a discrete system with random parameters is considered
as a model of the machine foundation. General solutions are given for the eigenvalue
problem, and the free and forced vibration problems. Expressions are derived for the
expected values and correlation functions, it being assumed that the appropriate prob-
abilistic characteristics of the system as well as the initial conditions and excitation are
known. The first order probabilistic method is used [8].
2. PROBLEM FORMULATION
The problem to be considered is that o f the vibration of a discrete system of n degrees
of freedom, governed by the equation
B?j(t) + C~t(t) + Kq(t) = f ( t ) , (2.1)
where q(t) is the vector of generalized co-ordinates, f ( t ) is the random excitation vector,
and B, C and K are random matrices of inertia, stiffness and damping. It is assumed that
C =/.tB + KK, (2.2)
with ~ and ,r non-negative real constants. The probabilistic characteristics, such as the
expected values and the covariance functions of the matrix constituents B, K, C and the
23
0022-460x/87/010023+05 s03.00/0 (~ 1987 Academic Press Inc. (London) Limited
24 w. M I R O N O W I C Z AND P. S N I A D Y
vectorf(t) are assumed to be known. The random elements of equation (2.1) are expressed
as sums of their expected values and the random fluctuations:
B=/~+B, C = C'+ C', K =/~+/~,
f(t) =J~(t) + f ( t ) , q(t) = 4(t) + @(t). (2.3)
Here the expected values are denoted as follows:
E[B] =/~, E[C] = C, E[K] = / ( , E[f(t)] =.f(t), E[q(t)] = t~(t). (2.4)
The random fluctuations of the constituent parts of the matrices B, C, K and the vector
q(t) are assumed to be small enough relative to their expected values for the first order
probabilistic method [8] to be a good approximation of the solution. In this case the
product of the random values X and Y has the form
(2.6)
For the eigenvalue problem equation (2.1) is transformed to the form
( K - t a 2 B ) q = 0. (2.7)
from which eigenvalues Ai ( i = 1 , 2 , . . . , n) and the normal mode vector t~= ~,~ can be
determined by using well known methods. These vectors can be used to construct a normal
mode matrix. Taking into account expression (3.1) in equation (2.8) where the unknown
factors ~, t~ occur, and after left-hand premultiplication by the vectors ~T (i = 1, 2 , . . . , n)
in order to eliminate the vector q, one obtains the vector of random fluctuations of the
eigenvalues,
= {/~-'}( l~/T/~IV - I~VT/~IV{Ai}), (3.2)
where {/;,} = l~Vr/~l~/. Symbols (')T and {. } denote the transposed vector or matrix and
the diagonal matrix, respectively.
RANDOM PARAMETER MACIIINE FOUNDATIONS 25
Random fluctuations of the vector of generalized co-ordinates q(t) satisfy the equation
2(t) = - ~'T~li'
I2 /t~,(t- ~')};"(T) d~ - ~'Tdl~'
Io {t~,(t -- ~')}~(~') d~
fo f 3, &~,l (3.12)
26 W. M I R O N O W I C Z A N D P. .SNIADY
where
f,~(t) = e -a,' sin .f'/,t, f~(t) = e -'~,' cos .0,t,
.0,~=,~-a, ~, a,=~,/2~,, :,~=:~,1:,,,
:(t) =
Io {1;,(t-~-)}~:.:0) tiT,
.~(0 =
Io{~,(t--r)}I~'T](,)dr
-
Io{h',(t--~')I(~'TN~'}(T)+ I~TcI'v~(7)+ I,VT/~I,V~(,))dr. (4.3)
By using the second of equations (4.3) in formula (3.14) one can determine the correlation
function. With the excitation v e c t o r f ( t ) assumed to be independent of the system random
characteristics B, C, K one obtains
K,.r(t,, t2) = io'io'o{h,(q- r,)} l'~'TK/r(r,, z2) 14:{i*l)(tz- rz)} dr, dr2
- fo" fo2{h~(t,-r,)}fV-~E[R(~',)R'r(~'2)]fVIt~(t2-~',)}
d~',dr2, (4.4)
4(t) = l~':(t) =
fo~(t-~-)/(,) d~-,
q(t) =
Io /4(t- r)f(r) dr-
Io I?t(t- r)R(r) dr, (4.5)
and
Kqq(ll ' 12) = l~Ksy(ll, t2) ~T
=Io"Io'*l?f(ti-ri)Klr(ti,t2)fflX(t,-h)dridh
After the equation sets (4.9) and (4.10) have been solved one obtains expected values of
the generalized co-ordinates and their random fluctuations from which the correlation
matrix can be determined.
The presented theoretical solutions are going to be illustrated by the exemplary analysis
of the block foundation of random parameters.
Z
2
Jr(t)
2p
t 2
I 4 I O,y 4 t 2
Figure 1. B l o c k f o u n d a t i o n .
The system random fluctuations are assumed to be given in the form of matrices B, K
of the same structure as those of equations (5.1). With the notation
0 = ~,~,T, 0 ' = ~'(a,} ~,T, 0" = ~'{a,}{a,} IP,
the correlation matrix (3.3) becomes
The elements r, s of the constituent matrices (5.2) are given by the formulae
3
E[(/(C//(T),] = /~,,E[/~,,/~,,], E[(/(CP/~T),,] = E O{,E[/~,,/~I,],
I=1
3 3 3
E[(/3OI/(T),] = E 01,E[/~,f,i], E[(/~/~/0/~T),~]= Y~ 2 0~,E[b,,bh,], (5.3)
I-I I=1 h = l
K,~ = E[ k,.k~,] = IA I ~Z,, exp (-~,x2- x,D cos , ( x 2 - x,) dxt dx2 , (5.5)
2
where or,, ~', and ,f are constants.
Figures 2(a) and (b) show the effect of the variations in the parameters ~', ~r on the
correlation function (5.5) and consequently on the correlation matrix (5.2).
In machine foundation design the ratio oJ'p is important because of the transitory
resonance problem. It is convenient to introduce the resonance index given by
/3 = (c3 -p)/,,/crL + cry, (5.6)
which is the analog of the reliability index for structural reliability problems. Here o~ and
o'~ are the natural frequency and its variance, and p and o-p2 are the frequency of excitation
and its variance, respectively. This index can be treated as the randomness measure at
the first-order level of the transitory resonance problem.
Figure 3 presents the variation of the index /3 =/3(~', ~:) for the foundation under
consideration; here o-~,=/~x =0, o'~, = o']3 and lack of correlation between/~ and/~y have
been assumed.
RANDOM PARAMETER MACHINE FOUNDATIONS 29
(a)
IO0
8O
(=0
40
I I T 1 I
05 I 1.5 2 2'5
,oo~..~o
oo l- -\
20 "
0.2 04 06 08 1.0
Figure 2. Correlation function (a) K,, = K,,(~) and (b) K,, = K,,(,~).
250
, ~ 200
*3
150
6- l o o
50
015 10 1 5 2 0 2 5 310
The forced vibration of the foundation in question has also been considered. For C = 0,
p = 2500 kg m -3,/~ = 3 k , / ~ =2k,/~. = 7k, k = 2 x 107 Nm -3, p = 6.32 s -I, ~"= 0.5, ~: = 0.25,
2 --
or,, - o" = constants, ao = [ 1,0, 2]Va, and the standard deviation of random fluctuation (4.7)
equal to 0. I a, the results are
o
~, = [559"5 1.29 57"3]Tx 10-t2a, qc = 0,
E[qqT] =
[3,30.4 72 32,.2]
7-2 0.02 0.7[+
"2473"9
10"9
10"9
.3"0
108"01 \
0.5[0"2 / x 10-24a 2.
1 #
321.2 0.7 32.9_1 108.0 0.5 4.9J ]
30 w. M I R O N O W I C Z A N D P. S N I A D Y
6. CONCLUSIONS
The dynamic response o f a structure having parameters with small random fluctuations
has been considered. A probabilistic analysis of such structures has been presented,
providing estimates o f the response and the structural reliability.
The general problem, in view of the randomness of the system parameters, is of a
non-linear character. The solution presented here is based on the linearization method
(probabilistic method of the first order) and hence is approximate. It is the more precise
the smaller the fluctuations are in relation to their expected values. This solution can also
be treated as a first iteration step. In the second step formula (2.5) should be taken in
the form
X Y = ,~"~" + ) ~ f ' + ,~"Y"+ .~Y. (6.1)
Performing the expected value operation then gives
E[X (2) Y(')] = ..Y~"+ E[.~ (') ~'(')], (6.2)
where indices ('), (2) denote the first and second iteration steps, respectively.
As an example a block foundation problem has been considered. Analysis of the
eigenvalue problem has been carried out, with the stiffness matrix assumed to have small
random fluctuations with a correlation function of the form (5.5).
As can be seen from Figures 2(a) and (b) the structural correlation function is consider-
ably affected for small values of ~', ~, but the disturbance to it stabilizes and diminishes
as these parameters increase in value.
Figure 3 shows the effect of the randomness on the resonance index fl =fl(~') (5.6).
Significant effects of the parameters, especially when ~" has small values, are evident.
An example of forced vibration analysis of the foundation under investigation has been
given as well.
REFERENCES
I. V. V. BOLOTIN 1965 Statistical Methods in Structural Mechanics. Moscow: Stroiizdat.
2. J. D. ROBSON 1964 An Introduction to Random Vibration. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University
Press, Amsterdam: Elsevier.
3. Y. K. LIN 1967 Probabilistic Theory of Structural Dynamics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
4. B. SKALNIERSKI and A. TYLIKOWSKI 1982 Stochastic Processes in Dynamics. Warsaw: PWN--
Polish Scientific Publishers.
5. J. O. COLLINS and W. T. THOMSON 1969 American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
Journal 7, 642-648. The eigenvalue problem for structural systems with statistical properties.
6. M. SHINOZUKA and C. J. ASTILL 1972 American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
Journal 10, 456-462. Random eigenvalue problems in structural analysis.
7. H. GRUNDMANN 1977 Munich ICOSSAR'77, 81-96. On the reliability of structures under
periodic loading.
8. C. A. CORNELL 1970 Structural Reliability and Codified Design, SM, Study No. 3, University of
Waterloo. A first order reliability theory of structural design.