Smart Contracts in

Supply Chain and

Logistics
Blockchain in Supply Chain and
Logistics Management
(TUTA3300)
AHM SHAMSUZZOHA, PHD
[email protected]
 Lecture Outline

Introduction to digital/smart contracts

Dimensions of smart contracts
Platforms for smart contract
Role of smart contracts in SC&L
Security challenges and measures

2
 Introduction to Smart Contracts

 The term ‘smart contracts’ was first coined by

Nick Szabo (Szabo, 1997).
 Essentially, smart contracts refer to algorithmic
contracts, without requiring the intervention of a
human third party or reliance on legal recourse.
 A simple example of a smart contract is a multi-
signature account, which require multiple users
to sign before a transaction is sent, with the
number of required signatures being a
parameter.

3
 Introduction to Smart Contracts
 Smart contracts acts as the bridge
which connects blockchain to the
real world.
 Smart contracts contain business
logic attached to transactions.
 A smart contract is a self-
executing contract embedded in
computer code managed by a
blockchain.
 The code contains a set of rules
under which the parties of that
smart contract agree to interact
with each other.
4
 Smart Contracts on Ethereum
 Smartcontracts are coded in a language such as Solidity, and compiled
into a bytecode, that every node on the Ethereum network can run
(Dannen, 2017).

 Ethereum programmable smart contracts allows for more general

computations through the addition of the Ethereum virtual machine
(Wood, 2014).

 In order to ensure that the cost associated with executing and

communicating information needed for smart contracts is covered, there is
a ‘gas’ payment associated with key smart contract operations.

5
 An Example of an Ethereum Solidity
Smart Contract

6
 Smart Contracts on Ethereum
 Above Figure is an example smart contract on Ethereum
written using Solidity – a contract is similar to a class in an
object-oriented language like C++ or Java (Solidity, nd).

 It defines two sets of variables

 one an address for a leader (which ends up being the node that
deploys and initiates this contract),
 the other a mapping of addresses to balance amounts.

 Itdefines a createCoin transaction that can be performed by

the leader,
 to generate coins for a given owner, and
 it defines a send transaction that can be used by owners of coins to
send to others.

7
 Applications of a Smart Contract
There are several places where smart  Insurance Claim
contracts can be applied. Some of the  Government Voting Service
application areas can be stated as
 Healthcare Services
follows:
 Internet of Things Network
 Records Storing
 Trading Activities

 Supply Chain Management

 Mortgage System
 Real Estate Market
 Employment Arrangements

 Protecting the Copyright

8
 Smart Contract in SC
 Smart contracts is basically a computer protocol intended to facilitate,
verify, or enforce contractual obligations in SC (Icertis, 2017).
 “Smart contracts are digital contracts, which are tamper-proof and
typically self-enforcing through automated execution”.
 Itnot only clarifies the contractual rules and penalties, but also enforce
those rules and penalties automatically within SC (Icertis, 2017).
 Within smartcontracts, predefined rules and regulations of a contractual
agreement are converted to computer codes, that run the blockchain in
SC (Min, 2019).
 Each actor in the supply chain sends data from its transactions to the
blockchain (Icertis, 2017).
9
 Dimensions of a Smart Contract

As in every other contract, a smart contract requires the following

necessary requirements:
 An offer requirements to be made
 The offer needs to be acknowledged
 There has to be legal consideration
 The parties must be able to join to the contract
 There must be free and unaffected consent

10
 Dimensions of Smart Contracts

(Khan et al., 2021)

11
 Platforms for Smart Contracts
 Smart contracts can be developed and deployed in different blockchain
platforms (Khan et al., 2021)
 Some platforms support high-level programming languages to develop smart
contracts. Some of the available platforms are:

 Bitcoin (Nakamoto, 2008): is a public blockchain platform that can be used to

process cryptocurrency transactions, but with a very limited computing
capability.
 NXT (Nxt Community, 2016): is an open-source blockchain platform that
relies entirely on a proof-of-stake consensus protocol. It includes a selection
of smart contracts that are currently living.

12
 Platforms for Smart Contract
 Ethereum (Buterin et al., 2014): is the first
blockchain platform for developing smart
contracts.
 It supports advanced and customized smart contracts
with the help of a Turing-complete virtual machine,
called the Ethereum virtual machine (EVM).
 Ethereum is currently the most popular development
platform for smart contracts and can be used to design
various kinds of decentralized applications (DApps) in
several domains.
 Ethereum or Ether or ERC-20 is considered as one of
the leading smart contract platform that most
developers choice.

13
 Platforms for Smart Contract

 Hyperledger Fabric (Androulaki et al. 2018): is an open-source enterprise-

grade distributed ledger technology platform, proposed by IBM and supports
smart contracts.
 It is set up by Lunix Foundation and considered as one of the top competitors of
Ethereum.
 It offers modularity and versatility for a broad set of industry use cases.
 The modular architecture for Hyperledger Fabric accommodates the diversity of
enterprise use cases through plug and play components.
 Hyperledger is nowadays developed under various names such as: Hyperledger Burrow,
Hyperledger Fabric, Hyperledger Sawtooth and Hyperledger Indy.

14
Overview of Hyperledger Fabric (Vyas et al. 2019)

15
 Platforms for Smart Contract
 Nem: This Nem platform for smart contract is launched on
March 31, 2015 and is written in Java that is favored by some
developers.
 Stellar:Stellar is considered as one of the oldest smart
contract platforms that was founded in 2014 and is
maintained by the Stellar Development Foundation. It is
nowadays used by various large companies into their existing
infrastructure.
 Waves: Waves was launched in June 2016 and is an open-
source platform for smart contracts. The goal of this platform
is to address many of the existing barriers to implement
blockchain, namely speed and scalability.
16
 Considerations for Choosing a Smart
Contract Platform
 Beforeconsidering any smart contract platform, several issues and questions
are needed to in mind such as:
 The reputation and need of the smart contract platform.
 For instance, if you need to create a cryptographic token, then you can use a blockchain
platform like the Ethereum blockchain network.
 If you want security via decentralization, then Ethereum is certainly a good choice.
 Depending of the needs of a use case
 For instance, if the use case needs a cryptographic token or not.
 The use cases that require a permissioned blockchain or not to develop a supply chain
assurance system or other enterprise blockchain applications.

17
 Advantage of Smart Contracts

 Total transparency

 No miscommunication
 Efficient performance
 No paperwork
 Backup

 Trustworthy

 Guaranteed outcomes
 Cost effective
(Source: 101 blockchain.com)

18
 Disadvantage of Smart Contracts
 Confidentiality
 Hyperledger provides its users with the private smart contract.
 But smart contracts examples like Ethereum doesn’t offer that privacy to its users.
 Error
 If the coders make some mistakes in the code and its users will be in loopholes
unintentionally, then there will be a question of accuracy.
 Unreliable Information
 At the very beginning, there’s a slight possibility to store wrong information. In that
case, the whole process will be an error with that false information.
 Rogue Contracts
 If a hacker hacked the system by chance, s/he would be able to conduct any illegal activities which will also
execute itself.
(Source: 101 blockchain.com)
19
 Role of Smart Contracts in SC&L
 Smart
contracts can make supply chain
management simpler and more transparent.
 Forthe supply chain industry, smart contracts
provide a fool-proof way of honoring contracts
between parties while meeting the conditions of
the contract.
 Sincethe data cannot tamper in a blockchain
transaction, no one can change delivery and
expiry dates and other such important details.
 Asinventory will be better managed, the stocks
will have minimum wastage.
20
 Security Challenges and Measures
in Smart Contracts

 As an emerging technology,
smart contracts currently face
many challenges, such as (Khan
et al., 2021)
 legal,
 reliance on “off-chain” resources,
 immutability,
 scalability, and
 consensus mechanism issues

21
 Security Challenges and Measures
in Smart Contracts
 Legal issues: The legal issue of smart contracts is another crucial
aspect of smart contract challenges. For example, GDPR.
 Reliance on “off-chain” Resources: Several smart contracts require
receiving information or parameters from resources that are not on the
blockchain itself, so-called off-chain resources.
 Immutability issue: The dark side of the immutability concept in
smart contracts lies mainly in the fact that in the event of any errors
made in the code, the immutability feature of a smart contract prevents
it from being rectified.

22
 Security Challenges and Measures
in Smart Contracts
 Scalability issue: It is the primary concern for many blockchain networks.
 For instance, the Ethereum blockchain can verify 14 transactions per second, which is slow as
compared with Visa that can handle up to 24,000 transactions per second.
 Indeed, the scalability issue leads to network congestion, increased commission fees for
transactions, and an increase in the time required to confirm the transactions.
 Consensus mechanism issue: The consensus mechanism plays the leading role to maintain security,
scalability, and decentralization in the blockchain networks at the same time.
 There are several existing consensus algorithms, including Proof-of-Work (PoW), Proof-of-Stake
(PoS), etc.
 Although the PoW algorithm enables security in the blockchain, it wastes resources.
 Thus, many organizations switch from the PoW algorithm to new consensus mechanisms that
promise lower fees for transactions as well as lower energy costs for the block production process.

23
 Conclusions

 Smartcontracts development bring speed, security,

transparency, cost-effectiveness, and tracking to the
supply chain scenario.
 Smart contracts manage the workflow of approvals
and automatically transfer payments when it has all the
signatures.
 Smart contract development has the potential to
transform the supply chain into a considerably
efficient and accurate method of transfer of goods and
services.

24
 References
 https://www.pinsentmasons.com/out-law/analysis/smart-contracts-better-supply-chains
 https://www.adaptideations.com/how-are-smart-contracts-transforming-supply-chain-
today#:~:text=Smart%20contracts%20can%20make%20supply,verified%20thereby%20making%20it%20smart.
 https://www.signitysolutions.com/blog/role-smart-contracts-reducing-supply-chain-wastage/
 https://101blockchains.com/smart-contracts/#5
 Androulaki E, Barger A, Bortnikov V, Cachin C, Christidis K, De Caro A, Enyeart D, Ferris C, Laventman G, Manevich Y et al
(2018) Hyperledger fabric: A distributed operating system for permissioned blockchains. In: Proceedings of the Thirteenth EuroSys
Conference, ACM, pp 30
 Buterin V et al (2014) A next-generation smart contract and decentralized application platform. White paper
 Nxt community: Nxt whitepaper. Available online at https://nxtdocs.jelurida.com/Nxt_Whitepaper (2016). Last accessed: 2020-10-
07
 Nakamoto S Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Available online at https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf (2008). Last accessed:
2020-10-20
 Khan, S.N., Loukil, F., Ghedira-Guegan, C. et al. Blockchain smart contracts: Applications, challenges, and future trends. Peer-to-
Peer Netw. Appl. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-021-01127-0
 Subramanian, Nachiappan, et al. Blockchain and Supply Chain Logistics : Evolutionary Case Studies, Springer International
Publishing AG, 2020.
 Vyas, Nick, et al. Blockchain and the Supply Chain : Concepts, Strategies and Practical Applications, Kogan Page, Limited, 2019.
25
THANKS A LOT!
AHSH@UVA. FI