Lecture 5
Lecture 5
Here, the capacitance is not like the one between a pair of parallel plates but an object
isolated in space which can store charge on its own and hence have a Capacitance.
The energy needed to add negatively charged electron to the dot is known as the
𝑒2
charging energy 𝐸𝑐 . 𝐸𝑐 = 2𝐶𝑑𝑜𝑡
, Where e = charge on the electron
⇒Coulomb blockade needs more energy than a given electron can "spend" trying
to tunnel in and out.
⇒ A free electron in a solid has a certain amount of energy depending on which
band it is in.
⇒ Due to thermal vibrations of the atoms in the lattice, these free electrons will
get extra energy to go to higher bands. The extra energy is equal to 𝐾𝐵𝑇 [𝑘𝐵 =
Boltzmann constant = 1.38 × 10-23 J/k]. With this extra energy, an excited
electron might be able to tunnel through a small barrier.
⇒ The coulomb blockade can prevent unwanted tunneling when the charging
energy is much higher than the thermal energy of an electron.
➢ The transfer of electrons through the barriers between the quantum dots would result in
charging of the neighboring quantum dots. Now this would increase the electrostatic
𝑒2
energy which is given by, 𝐸𝑐 = Where C is the effective capacitance of the island. This
2𝐶
electrostatic energy is also known as Coulomb energy or Coulomb blockade energy.
➢ Coulomb energy must be greater than the thermal fluctuations. Thus the required
𝑒2
condition to observe the single electron phenomenon is as follows: 𝐸𝑐 = ≫ 𝐾𝐵 𝑇, where
2𝐶
𝐾𝐵 is Boltzmann constant and 𝑇 is the temperature in Kelvin. The sequence of entrance
and leaving of an electron from one junction to another is generally known as “Correlated
tunneling electrons”.
4𝜋𝐾3
=2 × 3(2𝜋)3
4𝜋𝐾3
Here, 3 = volume of the sphere of radius 𝐾
2𝜋Τ𝐿 3 = volume occupied by one states
𝐿3 = volume of the real space
The factor 2 has been introduced to allow for double occupancy of each state by the
different carrier spin.
𝑔 𝐸 = 𝑑𝑁ൗ𝑑𝐸 = 𝑑𝑁ൗ𝑑𝐾 𝑑𝐾ൗ𝑑𝐸
𝑑𝑁 𝑑 4𝜋𝐾 3 4𝜋𝐾 2
= 2 =2
𝑑𝐾 𝑑𝐾 3(2𝜋)3 (2𝜋)3
ℏ2 𝐾 2 2𝑚∗ 𝐸 1/2
Now, we know, 𝐸 = 2𝑚∗
⟹𝐾= ℏ2
1/2
𝑑𝐾 2𝑚∗ 𝐸 −1/2
=
𝑑𝐸 ℏ2 2
The density of state in bulk: 𝑔 𝐸 = 𝑑𝑁Τ𝑑𝐸= 𝑑𝑁Τ𝑑𝐾 𝑑𝐾Τ𝑑𝐸
𝑑𝑁2𝐷ൗ 𝐾
𝑑𝐾 =
𝜋
This is the density of states for a single subband in a quantum well. If there are
2𝐷 𝑛 𝑚∗
many (n) confined state within the Q well system, 𝑔 𝐸 = σ𝑖=1 2 Θ(𝐸 − 𝐸𝑖 ) 𝜋ℏ
Θ = unit step function
1 1 4𝐾 2𝐾
For quantum wire, the total number of states, 𝑁 1𝐷 = 2 × 2𝐾 × 2𝜋Τ𝐿 × 𝐿 = =
2𝜋 𝜋
2 accounts for spin degeneracy.
1𝐷 1𝐷
𝑔1𝐷 𝐸 = 𝑑𝑁 ൗ𝑑𝐸 = 𝑑𝑁 ൗ𝑑𝐾 𝑑𝐾ൗ𝑑𝐸
𝑑𝑁1𝐷ൗ 2
𝑑𝐾 =
𝜋
1/2 1/2
2 2𝑚∗ 𝐸 −1/2 1 2𝑚∗
𝑔1𝐷 𝐸 = = 𝐸 −1/2
𝜋 ℏ2 2 𝜋 ℏ2
This is the density of states of a quantum wire. Quantum wires show maxima in the
density of states at around the subband minima. If there are many (n) confined state
within the Q wire system,
𝑛 1/2
2𝑚∗ 1
𝑔1𝐷 𝐸 = Θ(𝐸 − 𝐸𝑖 )
ℏ2 𝜋(𝐸 − 𝐸𝑖 )1/2
𝑖=1
Therefore, comparing the density of states for bulk (3D), quantum wells (2D) and
quantum wires (1D), it can be seen that successive reductions in degrees of
freedom for the electron motion, lead to reductions in the functional form of 𝑔 𝐸 by
the factors of 𝐸1/2 .
The density of states for reduced dimensionality
systems, rewritten in a standard form
The situation for quantum dots is quite different. As the particles are confined in
all directions, then there are no dispersion curves, and thus the density of states
is just dependent upon the number of confined levels. One single isolated dot
would therefore offer just two (spin-degenerate) states at the energy of each
confined level, and a plot of the density of states versus energy would be a
series of s-functions.
𝑔0𝐷 𝐸 = 2 𝛿(𝐸 − 𝐸𝑖 )
𝑖
The density of electron states of a semiconductor as a function of the
dimension. The optical absorption spectrum is roughly proportional to the
density of states.
Ballistic transport
➢If the length of a conduction path, 𝐿 is reduced to become much less than the
mean free path 𝐿𝑚 , it would be expected that no collisions would take place,
rendering the collision-based model useless.
➢In case of 𝐿 ≪ 𝐿𝑚 , electron transport occurs ballistically at very small length
scales. Here we assume that electrons travel in the wire without scattering,i.e.
the electrons do not collide with anything in the wire that changes their energy
or momentum. This is ballistic transport where the electron behaves like a
projectile traveling through the conductor.
➢ Interactions between electrons and the nuclei usually cause electron
scattering. The probability of an electron collision is enhanced by defects and
temperature (since the vibration of nuclei increases with temperature). Thus,
the scattering rate can be decreased by lowering the temperature and working
with very pure materials. But all materials have some scattering probability. So,
the smaller the conductor, the greater the probability that charge transport will
be ballistic. Thus, ballistic transport is a nanoscale phenomenon and can be
engineered in nanodevices.
➢For ballistic transport the electron has no interaction with the conductor. Thus, the
electron is not necessarily in equilibrium with the conductor, i.e. the electron is not
restricted to the lowest unoccupied energy states within the conductor.
➢But scattering can bump electrons from high energy states to lower energies.
There are two categories of scattering:
Elastic Scattering, where the scattering event may change the momentum of the
electron but its energy remains constant;
Inelastic scattering, where the energy of the electron is not conserved. Equilibrium
may be established by inelastic scattering.
2. 𝐿 ≪ 𝐿𝑚 , 𝐿𝜑 ⇒ Ballistic transport
⇒ occurs over very small length scales and is coherent.
⇒ During ballistic transport, no momentum or phase
relaxation. Thus, in a ballistic material, the electron wavefunction can be
obtain from Schrodinger’s equation