0% found this document useful (0 votes)
7 views5 pages

WS17

The document contains a worksheet for MATH 53 Multivariable Calculus, detailing solutions to problems involving the computation of curl and divergence of various vector fields. It also includes proofs of vector identities and addresses true/false questions related to vector calculus concepts. The problems are sourced from past exams and worksheets for the course.

Uploaded by

Jonse ketela
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
7 views5 pages

WS17

The document contains a worksheet for MATH 53 Multivariable Calculus, detailing solutions to problems involving the computation of curl and divergence of various vector fields. It also includes proofs of vector identities and addresses true/false questions related to vector calculus concepts. The problems are sourced from past exams and worksheets for the course.

Uploaded by

Jonse ketela
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Discussion 17 Worksheet Answers

Some past exam problems


Date: 11/8/2021

MATH 53 Multivariable Calculus

1 Computing Curl and Divergence


For each of the following vector fields F~ , compute its curl and divergence. State whether each
vector field is irrotational, incompressible, or neither.

1. F~ = x~i + y~j + z~k


Solution: We have
∂ ∂ ∂
∇ · F~ = x+ y+ z =1+1+1=3
∂x ∂y ∂z
and      
∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂
∇ × F~ = z− ~
y i+ x− ~
z j+ y− x ~k = ~0.
∂y ∂z ∂z ∂x ∂x ∂y
Because ∇ × F~ = ~0, we see that F~ is irrotational.

2. F~ = hy 2 , z 3 , x4 i
Solution: We have
∂ 2 ∂ 3 ∂ 3
∇ · F~ = y + z + x =0+0+0=0
∂x ∂y ∂z
and
     
∂ 4 ∂ 3 ~ ∂ 2 ∂ 4 ~ ∂ 3 ∂ 2 ~
∇ × F~ = x − z i+ y − x j+ z − y k
∂y ∂z ∂z ∂x ∂x ∂y
= −3z 2~i − 4x3~j − 2y~k.

Because ∇ · F~ = 0, we see that F~ is incompressible.

3. F~ = hy 2 x, ez , z 2 i

1
Solution: We have
∂ 2 ∂ z ∂ 2
∇ · F~ = y x+ e + z = y 2 + 2z
∂x ∂y ∂z
and
     
∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂
∇ × F~ = 2
z − e ~i +
z 2
y x− z ~j +
2 z
e − y x ~k
2
∂y ∂z ∂z ∂x ∂x ∂y
= −ez~i − 2yx~k.

This vector field is neither irrotational nor incompressible (as ∇ · F~ and ∇ × F~ are both
nonzero).

4. F~ = ∇f , where f (x, y, z) = 2xyeyz


Solution: We have
∂2f ∂2f ∂2f
∇· F~ = + + = 0+(4xzeyz +2xyz 2 eyz )+2xy 3 eyz = (4xz +2xyz 2 +2xy 3 )eyz
∂x2 ∂y 2 ∂z 2
and
∂2f ∂2f ~
 2
∂2f ~
 2
∂2f ~ ~
   
∂ f ∂ f
∇ × F~ = − i+ − j+ − k=0
∂y∂z ∂z∂y ∂z∂x ∂x∂y ∂x∂y ∂y∂x

by Clairaut’s theorem.

2 Divergence and Curl Identities


Let F~ = hP, Q, Ri and G
~ = hP 0 , Q0 , R0 i be vector fields on R3 , and let f : R3 → R and g : R3 → R
be functions on R3 . Assume all of these are infinitely differentiable. Prove each of the following
vector identities.

1. ∇ · (F~ + G)
~ = ∇ · F~ + ∇ · G
~

Solution:
~ = (P + P 0 )x + (Q + Q0 )y + (R + R0 )z
∇ · (F~ + G)
= Px + Qy + Rz + Px0 + Q0y + Rz0
= ∇ · F~ + ∇ · G.
~

2. ∇ × (F~ + G)
~ = ∇ × F~ + ∇ × G
~

2
Solution: It’s easiest to verify this component-by component. For the ~i component,
we have
~ · ~i = (R + R0 )y − (Q + Q0 )z
(∇ × (F~ + G))
= (Ry − Qz ) + (Ry0 − Q0z )
= (∇ × F~ ) · ~i + (∇ × G)
~ · ~i
= (∇ × F~ + ∇ × G)
~ · ~i.

Similarly we see that the desired equation holds when we look at the ~j and ~k compo-
nents, proving the result.

3. ∇ · (f F~ ) = f (∇ · F~ ) + F~ · (∇f )
Solution:

∇ · (f F~ ) = (f P )x + (f Q)y + (f R)z
= (fx P + f Px ) + (fy Q + f Qy ) + (fz R + f Rz )
= (f Px + f Qy + f Rz ) + (fx P + fy Q + fz R)
= f (∇ · F~ ) + F~ · (∇f ).

4. ∇ × (f F~ ) = f (∇ × F~ ) + (∇f ) × F~

Solution: It’s easiest to verify this component-by component. For the ~i component,
we have

(∇ × (f F~ )) · ~i = (f R)y − (f Q)z
= fy R + f Ry − fz Q − f Qz
= f (Ry − Qz ) + (fy R − fz Q)
= f (∇ × F~ ) · ~i + ((∇f ) × F~ ) · ~i
= (f (∇ × F~ ) + (∇f ) × F~ ) · ~i.

A similar computation shows that the identity holds for the ~j and ~k components, proving
the the identity.

5. ∇ · (F~ × G)
~ =G
~ · (∇ × F~ ) − F~ · (∇ × G)
~

Solution:
~ = (QR0 − RQ0 )x + (RP 0 − P R0 )y + (P Q0 − QP 0 )z
∇ · (F~ × G)
= Qx R0 + QRx0 − Rx Q0 − RQ0x + Ry P 0 + RPy0 − Py R0 − P Ry0 + Pz Q0 + P Q0z − Qz P 0 − QPz0
= P 0 (Ry − Qz ) + Q0 (Pz − Rx ) + R0 (Qx − Py ) − P (Ry0 − Q0z ) − Q(Pz0 − Rx0 ) − R(Q0x − Py0 )
=G~ · (∇ × F~ ) − F~ · (∇ × G).
~

6. ∇ · (∇f × ∇g) = 0

3
Solution: This follows from the previous identity (taking F~ = ∇f and G
~ = ∇g) and
the fact that ∇ × (∇f ) = ∇ × (∇g) = 0.

7. ∇ × (∇ × F~ )) = ∇(∇ · F~ ) − ∇2 F~
Solution: We again work component-by-component. Note

∇ × F~ = (Ry − Qz )~i + (Pz − Rx )~j + (Qx − Py )~k,

so

∇ × (∇ × F~ ) · ~i = (Qx − Py )y − (Pz − Rx )z


= Qxy − Pyy − Pzz + Rxz


= (Pxx + Qxy + Rxz ) − (Pxx + Pyy + Pzz )
= (Px + Qy + Rz )x − (Pxx + Pyy + Pzz )
= (∇(∇ · F~ )) · ~i − (∇2 F~ ) · ~i
= ∇(∇ · F~ ) − ∇2 F~ · ~i.


Similar arguments show the identity also holds in the ~j and ~k components, proving the
identity.

3 Challenge
~ and B
Suppose you are given a pair of (infinitely differentiable) vector fields E ~ in R3 in R3 , and
consider each vector field as additionally varying with respect to a variable t (in addition to the
variables x, y, and z for R3 ). Suppose furthermore that these vector fields satisfy the “Maxwell
equations in vacuum:”

~
∂B
~ =0
∇·E ~ =−
∇×E
∂t
~
~ =0
∇·B ~ = 1 ∂E
∇×B
c2 ∂t
for some constant c2 > 0. Prove that these vector fields satisfy the “wave equations”

1 ∂2E~ 1 ∂2B~
~ =
∇2 E ~ =
∇2 B .
c2 ∂t2 c2 ∂t2
~ is the vector Laplacian
Here ∇2 E

~
∂2E ~
∂2E ~
∂2E
~ =
∇2 E + + ,
∂x2 ∂y 2 ∂z 2

and ∇2 B~ is defined similarly (with E


~ replaced by B).
~
By completing this exercise, you are showing that the fundamental laws of electrodynamics
suggest the possibility of electromagnetic waves, i.e. light. Fiat lux!

4
Solution: Problem 7 from Section 2 above shows that
~ = ∇(∇ · E)
∇2 E ~ − ∇ × (∇ × E).
~

~ and ∇ × E
Substituting in the equations for ∇ · E ~ here gives
!
∂ ~
B ~
∂B
~ =0−∇× −
∇2 E =∇× .
∂t ∂t

By Clairaut’s theorem, we can replace this with

~ = ∂  
~ .
∇2 E ∇×B
∂t
~ gives
Substituting in the equation for ∇ × B
!
~ 1 ∂2E~
~ = ∂
∇2 E
1 ∂E
= .
∂t 2
c ∂t 2
c ∂t2

~ is similar.
The proof of the wave equation for B

4 True/False
Supply convincing reasoning for your answer. Assume all functions are infinitely differentiable
unless stated otherwise.

(a) T F For every vector field F~ on R3 , we have ∇ · (∇ × F~ ) = 0.


Solution: TRUE. This follows by a direct computation in the same vein as those in
Section 2 above.
(b) T F The divergence of a vector field is a scalar function, while the curl of a vector field is a vector
field.
Solution: TRUE. This is immediate from the definitions.

(c) T F Every vector field F~ on R3 arises as the curl of some vector field G.
~

Solution: FALSE. Because ∇ · (∇ × G) ~ = 0 for all G,


~ we see that we must have
∇ · F~ = 0, which does not hold for all F~ .

(d) T F Every function f : R3 → R arises as the divergence of some vector field F~ .


Solution: TRUE. For example, if we define
Z x
g(x, y, z) = f (t, y, z) dt,
0

then f is the divergence of the vector field F~ = hg, 0, 0i (by the fundamental theorem
of calculus).

Note: These problems are taken from the worksheets for Math 53 in the Spring of 2021 with Prof. Stankova.

You might also like