0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views7 pages

RUBRICS

The document contains various rubrics for evaluating different types of work, including photographs, translations, problem-solving strategies, and mathematical explanations. Each rubric outlines specific criteria for assessing achievement levels, ranging from excellent to inadequate, with detailed descriptions for each level. The rubrics aim to provide clear guidelines for evaluating clarity, accuracy, creativity, and understanding in various contexts.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views7 pages

RUBRICS

The document contains various rubrics for evaluating different types of work, including photographs, translations, problem-solving strategies, and mathematical explanations. Each rubric outlines specific criteria for assessing achievement levels, ranging from excellent to inadequate, with detailed descriptions for each level. The rubrics aim to provide clear guidelines for evaluating clarity, accuracy, creativity, and understanding in various contexts.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

RUBRICS

MMW

#1

Rubric for Evaluating a Photograph of a Pattern in Nature (each item)

General Approach
Level of
Achievement (Pattern Clarity, Composition and Framing, Lighting, Focus and Sharpness, Creativity
and Perspective)

The photograph highlights a unique, clear, and intriguing natural pattern that is well-
observed. The image is well-composed, with balanced elements and careful framing
that enhances the pattern. The lighting is used expertly to enhance the pattern,
creating depth and visual interest. The photograph is crisp and sharp, with the pattern
Excellent (3) in perfect focus, emphasizing its details. The perspective or angle chosen adds
uniqueness and interest to the pattern, showcasing creativity. Two picture given and
original.

The photograph captures a recognizable natural pattern, though it may not be very
unique. The composition is good, with some elements placed thoughtfully to show
the pattern. Lighting is clear and sufficient but could be improved for better emphasis
Good (2)
on the pattern. The pattern is mostly in focus, with some minor blurring in certain
areas. The perspective is good, though it could be more dynamic or experimental.
Only one original picture.

The pattern is visible but is common or not very compelling. The composition is
decent but may be unbalanced or cluttered, detracting from the pattern. Lighting is
adequate but may result in harsh shadows or overexposure, obscuring the pattern.
Satisfactory (1)
The focus is somewhat soft, and the pattern is not entirely clear. The perspective is
conventional and does not add much to the visual appeal. Picture are from the
internet.

0 No answer.

#2

Rubric for Translating English Phrases to Mathematical Phrases and Vice Versa
General Approach
Level of
Achievement (Accuracy of Translation, Mathematical Notation and Symbols, Clarity of Expression,
Contextual Understanding, Creativity and Problem Solving)

The translation is fully accurate, with no errors in logic or mathematical expressions.


Uses correct and appropriate mathematical symbols and notation for the given
context. The mathematical phrase is clear, precise, and easy to interpret. Fully
Excellent (2)
understands and captures the meaning and context of the original phrase in both
directions (English to math and vice versa). Demonstrates creative problem-solving in
representing complex English phrases mathematically.

The translation is mostly accurate, with minor mistakes or inconsistencies. Uses


mostly correct symbols and notation, with a few minor errors. The mathematical
Good (1) phrase is understandable, but could be clearer or more concise. Captures most of the
meaning and context, but may miss some subtleties. Adequately represents English
phrases mathematically, though more creative solutions could be explored.

The translation has some noticeable errors or inconsistencies, affecting meaning.


Some symbols or notation are used incorrectly, leading to confusion. The expression is
Satisfactory (0) somewhat unclear or overly complicated for the given context. Misses some key
aspects of meaning or context in the translation. Uses standard or simple
mathematical representations, with little exploration of different methods.

#3

General Approach
Level of Achievement
(Correctness of Answer and Use of Example)

The answer is accurate and example is relevant and


Excellent (3)
compelling.

The answer is accurate. Examples are relevant but may


Good (2)
lack depth.

Needs Improvement (1) The answer is incorrect. Examples are limited or weak.

0 No answer.

#4
General Approach
Level of
Achievement (Correct Identification of Differences, Identification of Pattern, Prediction of Next
Term)

All first differences, second differences, and higher differences (if applicable) are
correctly calculated and written out. The pattern of differences is clearly identified
Excellent (5) and correctly analyzed, showing a strong understanding of the sequence’s behavior.
The next term is predicted accurately using the correct pattern and the difference
table, with a clear explanation of the steps.

Most differences are correctly identified, with only a few minor errors in calculations.
The pattern is identified with some analysis, though a small error may affect the
Good (4)
understanding of the sequence. The next term is predicted correctly with a minor
error in reasoning or explanation.

Some differences are calculated correctly, but several errors are present. The pattern
is somewhat identified, but the analysis is incomplete or partially inaccurate. The
Satisfactory (3)
next term is predicted with some accuracy, but the reasoning or explanation is
incomplete or unclear.

Needs Many differences are calculated incorrectly, affecting the overall pattern. The pattern
improvement is unclear or incorrectly identified, showing misunderstanding. The next term is
(2) predicted with significant errors in reasoning or explanation.

Differences are calculated incorrectly or are missing entirely. No pattern is identified,


Inadequate (1) or the pattern is entirely incorrect. The next term is not predicted correctly, with little
or no supporting reasoning.

0 No answer.
#5

Rubric for Solving Polya’s Four-Step Problem Solving Strategy

Criteria Score 5 (Excellent) Score 4 (Good) Score 3 (Satisfactory)

The student demonstrates a


The problem is fully
good understanding of the The student has a limited or
understood, and the student
problem, identifying the key incomplete understanding
Problem clearly identifies the key
components but with minor of the problem, missing key
Understanding variables, constraints, and
uncertainties or incomplete elements or misinterpreting
goals. The interpretation is
identification of the important details.
accurate and thorough.
constraints.

A well-thought-out plan is The plan is unclear,


A solid plan is created,
devised with clear, logical incomplete, or flawed. The
though some aspects of the
steps. The strategy is well- execution of the plan may
Planning and approach may be unclear or
suited to the problem, and have significant errors or
Execution less efficient. The execution
the execution is accurate omissions, resulting in an
is mostly correct, but minor
and complete, leading to the incorrect or incomplete
errors may occur.
correct solution. solution.

The student thoroughly The solution is reviewed The solution is not


reviews the solution, checks with some attention to adequately reviewed.
the work, and justifies the detail. The answer is mostly Mistakes or errors in
Review and
final answer. Any mistakes correct, but there may be reasoning are not identified
Reflection
are identified and corrected, minor errors not fully or corrected. Little to no
and the approach is fully addressed. Reflection on the reflection on the process is
reflected upon. process is limited. provided.

#6

Rubric for Solving Statistical Data in Table Form

Criteria 3 (Excellent) 2 (Good) 1 (Needs Improvement)

Accuracy and All statistical measures (mean, Most of the statistical Many statistical measures
Completeness median, mode, range, measures are calculated are calculated incorrectly,
population variance, and correctly, but minor or key steps are missing.
standard deviation) are calculation or rounding There are significant errors
calculated correctly, showing errors may be present. in calculations or
Criteria 3 (Excellent) 2 (Good) 1 (Needs Improvement)

clear and complete steps. The Some steps or


interpretation is accurate and explanations might be interpretation.
well-organized. missing.

#7

Criteria Score 1 (Excellent) Score 0 (Needs Improvement)

The sentence is accurately identified as either The sentence is incorrectly identified.


Correct correct or incorrect statement. All aspects of The reasoning for identifying the
Identification the sentence are considered in making the sentence as correct or incorrect is
determination. unclear or incorrect.

Criteria Score 2 (Excellent) Score 1 (Needs Improvement)

The truth table is fully and correctly The truth table is partially correct but
Accuracy and constructed, showing all possible truth contains errors or omissions in the truth
Completeness values for each variable and the correct values or final results. Some truth values
result for the given logical statement. are missing or incorrect.

Criteria Score 2 (Excellent) Score 1 (Needs Improvement)

The converse, inverse, and/or


The converse, inverse, and contrapositive
contrapositive are partially correct or
Correctness and are correctly written, with the proper
contain errors in logical transformation.
Completeness logical transformations applied to the
Some statements may be missing or
original conditional statement.
incorrectly written.

#8

Criteria Score 2 (Excellent) Score 1 (Needs Improvement)

The message is accurately deciphered or The message is partially deciphered or


Accuracy enciphered with no errors in the final output. enciphered with errors in the final result.
of Result The encryption/decryption method is correctly Some parts of the message may be
applied throughout. decoded/encoded incorrectly.

#9
Score 3 Score 2 (Needs
Criteria Score 5 (Excellent) Score 4 (Good) Score 1 (Poor)
(Satisfactory) Improvement)

The design
demonstrates a
clear and The design The design
The design The design does
sophisticated use applies geometric applies geometric
shows basic use not apply
of geometric concepts concepts in a
Application of geometric geometric
principles (e.g., correctly but may limited or
of concepts but concepts or does
symmetry, lack complexity incorrect manner,
Geometric lacks depth or so incorrectly,
transformations, or some with several key
Concepts correct with little
proportions, elements may be elements missing
application in understanding of
angles, etc.). All less well- or
some areas. geometry.
elements are developed. misunderstood.
accurately and
effectively applied.

The design is
The design is highly
original but may The design is The design lacks The design lacks
original, innovative,
rely on common somewhat originality and originality,
and demonstrates
Creativity geometric generic and may creativity, using creativity, and is
creative use of
and patterns or ideas. rely heavily on basic or overused overly simplistic
geometric shapes
Originality It shows some typical geometric geometric shapes or copied from
and patterns. The
creativity and shapes or with little existing
design is unique
thoughtful design patterns. variation. patterns.
and imaginative.
elements.

The design has The design is


The design is
The design is noticeable The design has poorly executed
precisely drawn,
mostly accurate inaccuracies in several with numerous
with clean lines,
but may have proportions, noticeable errors inaccuracies,
accurate
Precision minor errors in angles, or in accuracy, making it
measurements,
and proportions, measurements proportions, or difficult to
and well-executed
Accuracy angles, or but still geomet18ry, identify the
proportions. It is
measurements. It maintains a affecting its geometric
visually balanced
is generally well- somewhat overall concepts or
and geometrically
executed. balanced coherence. create a
accurate.
appearance. coherent visual.

Rubric for Explanation in Math


Medium Score (3-4 Needs Improvement (1-2
Criteria Highest Score (5 points)
points) points)

The explanation is exceptionally


The explanation is clear The explanation is unclear,
Clarity, clear, accurate, and thorough.
and mostly accurate, but contains inaccuracies, or
Accuracy, and Mathematical concepts are
may lack depth or some lacks sufficient reasoning
Depth of explained in a step-by-step
steps might not be fully and detail, making it
Explanation manner, with detailed reasoning
explained or detailed. difficult to understand.
and appropriate examples.

Rubric for Solving a Math Equation

Needs Improvement (1
Criteria Highest Score (3 points) Medium Score (2 points)
point)

The solution is completely The solution is mostly


The solution is incorrect, with
Correctness and correct, with all steps shown correct, but may contain
significant errors in steps or
Accuracy of clearly and accurately, minor errors in steps or
the final answer, or key steps
Solution leading to the correct final final answer, or some
are missing.
answer. steps are unclear.

You might also like