PDF (Ebook) Spatial Planning in Service Delivery: Towards Distributive Justice in South Africa by Hangwelani Hope Magidimisha, Lovemore Chipungu ISBN 9783030198497, 9783030198503, 3030198499, 3030198502 download
PDF (Ebook) Spatial Planning in Service Delivery: Towards Distributive Justice in South Africa by Hangwelani Hope Magidimisha, Lovemore Chipungu ISBN 9783030198497, 9783030198503, 3030198499, 3030198502 download
PDF (Ebook) Spatial Planning in Service Delivery: Towards Distributive Justice in South Africa by Hangwelani Hope Magidimisha, Lovemore Chipungu ISBN 9783030198497, 9783030198503, 3030198499, 3030198502 download
com
DOWLOAD EBOOK
ebooknice.com
ebooknice.com
https://ebooknice.com/product/sat-ii-success-
math-1c-and-2c-2002-peterson-s-sat-ii-success-1722018
ebooknice.com
ebooknice.com
(Ebook) Cambridge IGCSE and O Level History Workbook 2C -
Depth Study: the United States, 1919-41 2nd Edition by
Benjamin Harrison ISBN 9781398375147, 9781398375048,
1398375144, 1398375047
https://ebooknice.com/product/cambridge-igcse-and-o-level-history-
workbook-2c-depth-study-the-united-states-1919-41-2nd-edition-53538044
ebooknice.com
https://ebooknice.com/product/ngos-and-social-justice-in-south-africa-
and-beyond-51606374
ebooknice.com
ebooknice.com
ebooknice.com
Spatial Planning in
Service Delivery
Spatial Planning
in Service Delivery
Towards Distributive Justice in South Africa
Hangwelani Hope Magidimisha Lovemore Chipungu
University of Kwazulu-Natal University of Kwazulu-Natal
Durban, South Africa Durban, South Africa
This Palgrave Macmillan imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature
Switzerland AG
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
Foreword
This book is unique, relevant and timely. It engages with the future we
want as articulated in the quote above from the Vision Statement of
South Africa’s National Development Plan (NDP 2030).
Engaging critically with spatial planning in service delivery is essential in
a colonially marred society where people were literally, physically separated
from one another (apart-ness). The National Party government in particu-
lar constructed spaces in such a way that the white population occupied the
1National Development Plan 2030 Our Future—Make it Work (2030: 14). Chapter 8 of
the NDP deals with “Transforming human settlements and the national space economy”.
Many of the issues raised in this book contribute to thinking about what a future “space
economy” would look like.
v
vi Foreword
most convenient spaces with easy access to basic services and public institu-
tions, and the majority black population was pushed to the less abundant
periphery. Spatial injustice was legislated by the architects of apartheid.
Integrated living spaces are what is needed; and in the South African
context the land question is believed to be part of the solution. But the
City of Johannesburg is an example of continued separation, where the
majority of people live in the South Western townships (Soweto and sur-
rounds), far from public institutions such as libraries, theatres, universi-
ties, museums, parks and retails stores, which are all situated in the inner
city, while money and resources are located in Sandton, where wealth is
over-concentrated. Poor or non-existent public transport systems con-
tinue to separate South Africans and entrench power relations as mobility
and influence remain unequal. It is clear that these disparities are about
both justice and economics: redressing the injustices of the past and
effecting economic emancipation.
Spatial justice brings together social justice and space. It has been
acknowledged by scholars that the organisation of space is a crucial
dimension of human societies, reflecting social facts and influencing
social relations. The social and economic facts are stark in South Africa—
where poor and vulnerable people literally living on the margins remain
black. Those who live on the margins in ever-growing townships and
poverty-stricken urban and rural settlements have turned to the govern-
ment most of them voted for to improve their living conditions through
the fulfilment of the justiciable socio-economic rights embedded in the
Constitution of South Africa, 1996.
Section 26 of the Constitution states that “everyone has the right
to have access to adequate housing” and asserts that this right should
be progressively realised by the state. The latter right has been inter-
preted by the Constitutional Court to include sanitation and electricity.
Section 27 provides for access to health care services; sufficient food and
water; and social security. A caveat is built into this section: government
should be given time (“progressive” realisation) if it does not have ade-
quate resources to fulfil these obligations. But progress must be demon-
strated; significantly, the limitation does not apply to children, whose
rights must be fulfilled immediately (section 28). In addition, section 24
of the Bill of Rights states that everyone in South Africa should be enti-
tled to an environment that is not harmful to their health or well-being.
Service delivery protests by the poor who live in intolerable condi-
tions could be classified into two types: those where communities have
Foreword vii
been waiting for too long to have their needs met and their voices heard;
and those where communities receive services but have not been con-
sulted about anything. This lack of participation in the planning process
leads to frustration as, contrary to popular belief, the poor do not want
to be perceived as passive; they have every right to have a say in where
their schools and clinics are built. This is not to condone violence and
the destruction and burning of property, which happens in extreme cases
such as the case of Vuwani. Often cases of poor or inadequate service
delivery are taken to the courts through Public Interest Litigation.
In terms of international law, the Covenant on Economic, Social, and
Cultural Rights (ICESCR) protects additional rights—“red” rights—
many of which have yet to be realised in highly unequal societies such as
South Africa. These include the right to work (art. 6); to just wages and
safe working conditions (art. 7); to social security and social insurance
(art. 9); to a decent standard of living and freedom from hunger (art.
11); to universal basic education (art. 13); and to an enjoyment of the
cultural life and scientific progress of the country. This Covenant applies
to both individuals and impoverished, vulnerable and marginalised com-
munities. Having ratified this Convention the South African government
now has a duty to report to the Committee on what progress has been
made, and what plans it has for further and faster implementation.
The growing gap between the rich and the poor across the globe
is a reflection of inequalities amongst states and within states. Achieving
equality therefore calls for putting these inequalities at the centre of
development efforts and investing resources in efforts that promote
non-discrimination, equity and the empowerment of vulnerable groups.
Development, to which space and land are central, should be both sus-
tainable and inclusive, as articulated in the Sustainable Development Goals
Vision 2030 (SDGs). Goal 11 deals with sustainable cities and commu-
nities; and any study of all the goals requires that the concept of leaving
no-one behind be kept in mind. This goal articulates that
• By 2030, ensure access for all to adequate, safe and affordable hous-
ing and basic services, and upgrade slums
• By 2030, provide access to safe, affordable, accessible and sustain-
able transport systems for all, improving road safety, notably by
expanding public transport, with special attention to the needs of
those in vulnerable situations, women, children, persons with disa-
bilities and older persons; and
• By 2030, enhance inclusive and sustainable urbanisation and capac-
ity for participatory, integrated and sustainable human settlement
planning and management in all countries.
The authors acknowledge that compiling this book was not an easy fit. In
the entire duration from the time the study was undertaken to the time
this book was compiled, support was obtained from different sectors. The
first gratitude goes to the Human Science and Research Council where
the initial idea to write the book was conceived and supported strongly. It
is from this institution where access to existing datasets (such SASAS) was
officially granted. On the other hand, the University of KwaZulu-Natal,
provided the platform from which the data was collected and analysed.
Through the NRF financial support, the dream of compiling the book
became a reality as resources were availed for this project.
ix
Contents
xi
xii Contents
4 Methodological Consideration 53
4.1 Introduction 53
4.2 The Research Process 54
4.3 Research Strategies 57
4.4 Sources of Data 57
4.4.1 Secondary Data Sources 57
4.4.2 Primary Data Sources 60
4.4.3 Sampling Procedure and Sample Size 62
4.4.4 Data Analysis 64
4.5 Problems Encountered with Fieldwork 65
References 65
Index 245
Abbreviations
xvii
List of Figures
xix
xx List of Figures
Fig. 10.29 Sanitation in rural areas (Source Survey Results 2013) 198
Fig. 10.30 Sanitation facilities at village level (Source Survey Results
2013) 199
Fig. 10.31 Perceptions on quality of services (Source Survey Results
2013) 200
Fig. 10.32 Perceptions on specific existing services (Source Survey
Results 2013) 201
Fig. 11.1 Level of satisfaction with housing (Source Survey Results
2013) 206
Fig. 11.2 Level of satisfaction as per village (Source Survey Results
2013) 206
Fig. 11.3 Level of housing satisfaction in urban areas
(Source Survey Results 2013) 207
Fig. 11.4 Perceptions on service delivery for the past 5 years
(Source Survey Results 2013) 209
Fig. 11.5 Perceptions on service delivery in the next 5-year period
(Source Survey Results 2013) 210
Fig. 11.6 Households perceptions on service providers
(Source Survey Results 2013) 212
Fig. 11.7 Contact authorities in service delivery (Source Survey
Results 2013) 213
Fig. 11.8 A composite overview of people’s perception
in the four villages (Source Survey Results 2013) 214
Fig. 11.9 Perceptions on service delivery in the next 5-year period
(Source Survey Results 2013) 215
Fig. 11.10 Perceptions on service delivery in the past 5-year
(Source Survey Results 2013) 216
Fig. 11.11 Perceptions on service delivery in the next 5-year period
(Source Survey Results 2013) 217
Fig. 11.12 Perceptions on level of trust in the municipality
by households (Source Survey Results 2013) 218
Fig. 11.13 Authorities contacted for service delivery (Source Survey
Results 2013) 218
Fig. 11.14 Composite picture of people’s perceptions in the four
urban centres (Source Survey Results 2013) 220
Fig. 13.1 The spatial sphere of equality (Source Authors 2014) 239
Fig. 13.2 Recommended model of redressing spatial inequality
(Source Authors 2014) 240
xxiii
List of Boxes
Box 7.1 Policy principles governing water and sanitation in South Africa 112
Box 7.2 The regulatory framework that empowers local authorities 123
xxv
PART I
1.1 Introduction
The creation and further sustenance of spatial inequality in most
developing countries has been labelled as a colonial creation
(Lester et al. 2000). This in its basic sense was a result of disinvest-
ment in African areas of interest which was explicitly aggravated by the
exploitation of indigenous resources. This exploitation saw the creation
of bare-minimum conditions for the local population while resources
were transported and invested elsewhere where comfortable conditions
for the minority were generously provided. The history of the develop-
ing world is rich in such discourse and as such, South Africa, though a
young democracy, also witnessed this aggravating level of marginalisation
which the country is still struggling to repair. It has been observed that
some young democracies tend to sustain such inconsistencies in devel-
opment since they fail to develop policies that respond positively to such
historical imbalances (Lester et al. 2000).
According to Lester et al. (2000) apartheid planning in South Africa
reinforced a scenario of underdevelopment in a country already marked
by regional disparities in terms of access to resources and land which
had emerged in the colonial period. The same views are echoed by May
(1998) who noted that apart from unsatisfactory access to clean water,
energy, health care and education among households, the distribution
of income and wealth in South Africa is among the most unequal in
the world. He further argues that although the country has shifted the
regime to a more democratic government, racial inequality is still visible
in poverty as seen in, 61% of Africans and 38% of Coloureds as compared
to only 5% Indians and 1% Whites. The persisting unequal distribution
of resources, skills and opportunities between racial groups and between
geographical areas presents major policy challenges to the South African
government (The Presidency 2006). The National Planning Commission
(2011) substantiates these views by contending that spatial patterns
exclude the poor from the fruits of development since public services
are uneven and often of poor quality and the country remains a divided
society.
Apartheid planning consigned the majority of South Africans to places
far away from work, where services could not be sustained, and where it
was difficult to access the benefits of society and participate in the econ-
omy. For this reason, the Commission proposed a strategy to address
the apartheid geography and create the conditions for more humane
and environmentally sustainable living and working environments that
respond directly to the South African Constitution—especially to the
provisions in the Bill of Rights that affirm the right of all to a healthy
environment, access to adequate housing, and basic services (National
Development Plan 2011: 260).
During the apartheid era, inequality was based on race. Most of
the effort of the liberation movement (pre-1994), were devoted
towards eliminating racial exclusion. Lester et al. (2000) argue that the
post-apartheid government, in a bid to respond to deep-rooted ine-
quality has implemented a range of interventions that intend to redress
inequality by addressing development backlogs and creating opportuni-
ties for historically disadvantaged groups. Some of the key policy doc-
uments that intend to address spatial inequalities as noted by Nel and
Rogerson (2009) include the National Spatial Development Perspective
(NSDP) of 2006, Regional Industrial Development Strategy of 2006 and
a number of other policies ranging from Spatial Development Initiatives
to Cluster Development Support Programmes, Provincial Growth and
Development strategies and Local Economic Development. All these
policy interventions mark the commitment of the post-apartheid gov-
ernment to address the deep-rooted spatial inequalities of the country.
However, it should be noted that:
1 SPATIAL INEQUALITY: AN INTRODUCTION 5
Material conditions …have divided our country into two nations, the one
black, and the other white. …[the latter] is relatively prosperous and has
ready access to a developed economic, physical, educational, communi-
cation and other infrastructure…The second, and larger, nation of South
Africa is black and poor, [and] lives under conditions of a grossly underde-
veloped infrastructure.
Noble et al. (2006) expound on these views in their study whose findings
reveal the degree to which former homelands are still more deprived as
compared to other areas. In their study of 2009, Noble et al. used the
indices of multiple deprivations for South Africa to demonstrate that many
former homeland areas, such as the former Transkei and former Ciskei
and Venda are characterised by almost uniformly high levels of poverty
and deprivation. The findings are contrasted with the much more varied
composition of urban areas, where affluent neighbourhoods and poor
6 H. H. MAGIDIMISHA AND L. CHIPUNGU
synonymous with poverty. It is for this very reason that the subsequent
section on theoretical underpinnings further explains inequality and
its derivatives within certain frameworks. These range from theories of
regional planning to theories of communicative planning. The detailed
discussion analyses the underlying principles, strengths and weaknesses of
these theories in a bid to draw strands that apply directly to the under-
standing of spatial inequality.
Spatial inequality in South Africa, its origin and its perpetuation
requires concrete evidence in order to substantiate any emerge discourses
around it. For quite some time, the colonial dispensation had borne the
blame for the current predicament the majority are experiencing. While
not discarding the fundamentals associated with is phase (i.e. colonial-
ism) in sowing the seeds of spatial inequality and propagating it, cogni-
sance of the dynamic of social formations and their spatial impact should
equally be considered. For this reason, this book is not based on mere
abstractions, but is driven by empirical evidence drawn from specific
case studies—in this case Vhembe District in Limpopo. In this regard,
Chapter 4 provides tools and techniques that were used to gather data
and compile this book. Both secondary and primary data sources were
used in this study. Emphasis is made on the fact that both qualitative and
quantitative research methods were used in order to provide a holistic
picture on spatial inequality. In addition, existing data sets such as South
Africa Social Attitudes Survey (SASAS) which were also used in this
book are equally explained in this chapter. Towards its concluding sec-
tions, insight is also provided in the data analysis techniques that were
employed among them being STATA and Microsoft Excel.
Is spatial inequality a South African problem alone? If not, how do
other governments intervene in the spatial, socio-economic space
in order to meet the positive expectations of the populace? Chapter 5
responds to these and other issues associated with spatial inequality by
interrogating how other governments are responsive to such challenges.
The need to understand governmental interventions in other coun-
tries is done through precedent studies. Three international case stud-
ies from Brazil, Germany and Zimbabwe were used in this book. Brazil,
whose economy is almost at the same economic level with South Africa
is a case study that was essentially selected to compare and learn some
of the intervention measures in service delivery. The Germany expe-
rience, being a developed country is meant to demonstrate how gov-
ernment interventional measures can be effectively used to resuscitate
1 SPATIAL INEQUALITY: AN INTRODUCTION 9
3 szeretette szerette
6 koldusánal koldusánál
133 mertékben nő mértékben nő
*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK A SZULTÁNA
ÁRNYÉKA ÉS EGYÉB ELBESZÉLÉSEK ***
Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will
be renamed.
1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also
govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most
countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside the
United States, check the laws of your country in addition to the terms
of this agreement before downloading, copying, displaying,
performing, distributing or creating derivative works based on this
work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The Foundation makes
no representations concerning the copyright status of any work in
any country other than the United States.
• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the
method you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The
fee is owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark,
but he has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to
the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty
payments must be paid within 60 days following each date on
which you prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your
periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked
as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information
about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation.”
• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.
1.F.
1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth in
paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO
OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation
methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of
other ways including checks, online payments and credit card
donations. To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate.
Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
facility: www.gutenberg.org.
Our website is not just a platform for buying books, but a bridge
connecting readers to the timeless values of culture and wisdom. With
an elegant, user-friendly interface and an intelligent search system,
we are committed to providing a quick and convenient shopping
experience. Additionally, our special promotions and home delivery
services ensure that you save time and fully enjoy the joy of reading.
ebooknice.com