Module 3
Module 3
Syllabus:
81
82
Page
Intellectual Property Rights (IPR): IPR refers to the privileges accorded to the
creator or inventor. These rights are given in exchange for revealing the process of cre-
ation or invention to the public. The inventor is conferred with special rights to use,
sell, distribute, offer for sale, and restrict others from using the invention without prior
permission.
Purpose of IPR : The primary purposes of IPR include encouraging innovation and
creativity, protecting the rights of creators and inventors, and maintaining a balance be-
tween public access and private rights.
1. Copyrights and Related Rights : Copyrights and Related Rights refer to cre-
ative expressions such as books, publications, architecture, music, wood/stone carv-
ings, pictures, portrays, sculptures, films, and software/databases.
Trade services: Any services in relation to trade or any trade related financing,
lending or other financial accommodation provided(or to be provided) by the bank,
including but not limited to issuance/amendment of letter of credit, document ar-
rival under letter of credit, application for negotiation and inquiries etc.,
Creativity and Progress: Creativity being the keystone of progress, no civilized society
can afford to ignore the basic requirement of encouraging the same. The economic and
social development of a society is largely dependent on creativity . The protection pro-
vided by the IPR to the creators/innovators is in fact an act of incentivization(providing
legal protection and exclusive rights to creators) for encouraging them to create more and
motivates others to create new.
Negative Impact of Rigid IPR: However, if IPR is practiced rigidly, it may have
a negative impact on the progress of society. For example, compliance with the Trade-
Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) Agreement has affected the
farming community as they are unable to store seeds for the next crop. Multinational
companies regulate the price of seeds, which is generally beyond the reach of a majority
of the farmers.
Balancing IPR with Exceptions:To address or mitigate the negative impact of IPR,
certain laws, exceptions and limitations associated with IPR have been enacted to main-
84
Page
tain a balance between the interests of the creators/inventors and the community.
For example, farmers rights under the Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers Rights
(PVP&FR) Act, 2001 entitles them to many privileges, such as Rights on seeds provides
rights to the farmers to save seeds, use seeds and share, exchange or sell seeds to other
farmers. Right to protection against accusations of infringement protects the farmers
from infringement and other legal accusation levied upon them due to his legal ignorance
in using other’s plant varieties.
The use of copyrighted material for education and religious ceremonies is exempted from
the operation of the rights granted in the Copyright Act. Similarly, a patent can be
revoked in favor of compulsory licensing by the government during an emergency or a
natural calamity.
Initiatives and Benefits: With initiatives like ‘Make in India’, ‘Atmanirbhar Bharat’
and supporting local homegrown brands, and easy as well as accessible approach to patents
and trademarks registration, it is possible to reap the benefits of our resources.
deal with various aspects of IP. The governance of all categories of IP, except the Plant
Variety and Farmers’ Rights Act, is carried out by the Department for Promotion of In-
dustry & Internal Trade (DPIIT) under the guidance, sponsorship, or authority of the
Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Government of India (GoI).
3.5 Origin of IP
Ancient IP Practices: Though there is no official record of the origin of IP, rudimentary
forms of IP were believed to exist around 500 Before the Common Era(BCE) in Sybaris,
a state of Greece.
Sybaris Example : Natives of Sybaris were granted a year’s protection for their intellect
to create “any new improvement in luxury”.
Global Adoption of IP Legislation : By the end of the 18th century and the be-
ginning of the 19th century, almost every country started laying down IP legislation to
protect their novel inventions and creations.
In this section, the history of IP in India is explored, covering the pre-independence era,
amendments and developments, the post-independence era, and key milestones in shaping
Indian patent laws.
87
Page
The history of the Indian patent system dates back to the pre-independence era of British
rule. The first patent-related legislation in India was Act VI of 1856, adapted from the
British Patent Law of 1852. The objective of this legislation was to encourage the inven-
tions of new and useful manufactures. The rights conferred to the inventor were termed
as ‘Exclusive Privileges’. In 1859, certain amendments were made to the Act:
The world’s first patent was granted in 1790 to Samuel Hopkins in the USA for the ”mak-
ing of potash and pearl ash by a new apparatus and process”. In India, the first patent
(known as ‘Exclusive Privileges’ at that time) was awarded in 1856 to a civil engineer,
George Alfred DePenning from Calcutta, for his invention, ‘An Efficient Punkah Pulling
Machine’.
Inclusion of ‘Designs’ in Patent Act: A few years later, it was felt that ‘Designs’
could also pass the criteria of the invention and thus should be included in the Patent
Act. The new Act was rechristened as “The Patterns and Designs Protection Act” under
Act XIII of 1872. This Act was further amended in 1883 (XVI of 1883) to include the
provision of protection for ‘Novelty’ in the invention.
The Indian Patents and Designs Act, 1911: At the beginning of the 20th century,
all the earlier Acts related to inventions and designs were done away with the introduc-
tion of ‘The Indian Patents and Designs Act, 1911’ (Act II of 1911). As per this Act, the
governance of patents was placed under the management of the Controller of Patents. In
the next three decades, many amendments were introduced for reciprocal arrangements
with other countries for securing priority dates. These amendments dealt with:
Patent of Addition.
After India got independence in 1947, many patent experts felt the need to review the
Indian Patents and Designs Act, 1911, keeping the national interest (economic and polit-
ical) in mind. A dedicated committee, chaired by a renowned Justice Bakshi Tek Chand
(retired Judge of Lahore High Court), was constituted in 1949 to review the advantages of
the patent system. The committee submitted a plethora of recommendations, including :
There must be a clear indication in the Act that food, medicine and surgical and
curative devices should be made available to the masses at the cheapest rate by
giving reasonable compensation to the owner of the patent.
Amendments in Sections 22, 23 and 23A of the Patent and Design Act, 1911, on
the lines of the UK Patent Act.
Amendments in 1950 and 1952: These recommendations were introduced in the Act
XXXII of 1950. Two years later, another amendment (Act LXX of 1952) was made to
provide compulsory licensing of patents related to food, drugs and chemicals killing in-
sects and microbes. Based on these amendments, a bill was presented in the parliament
in 1953 but was rejected.
Committee in 1957 and New Legislation in 1965: In 1957, the central govern-
ment constituted yet another powerful committee under the chairmanship of Justice N.
Rajagopala Ayyangar to seek inputs for further strengthening the Indian Patent Law. The
committee submitted its report to the government in 1959. It comprised two segments
addressing:
Patents Act, 1970 : The revised patent legislation was submitted to the Lok Sabha in
1965. After many hiccups, clarifications, and modifications, the Patents Act, 1970 (http:
//www.ipindia.nic.in/writereaddata/Portal/IPOAct/1_31_1_patent-act-1970-11march2015.
pdf) was introduced, superseding all the previous laws related to the patents. However,
the Indian Patents and Designs Act of 1911 remained applicable for designs only until
1994.
India Signs TRIPS Agreement in 1995: In 1995, India signed the TRIPS Agreement
and got a transition period of 10 years (1995-2005) to make domestic laws compatible with
the international treaty.
Patents (Amendment) Act, 1999 : In 1999, The Patents (Amendment) Act, 1999
was introduced providing for the filing of applications for ‘Product Patents’ in the areas of
drugs, pharmaceuticals and agrochemicals (earlier, only ‘processes’ were protected under
the Patent Act). The new Patent Act also included provisions for the grant of Exclusive
Market Rights (EMRs) for the distribution and sale of pharma products on fulfillment of
certain conditions.
Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002: The second amendment to the 1970 Act was
made through the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002 (Act 38 of 2002). This Act intro-
duced new Patent Rules, 2003, thus replacing the earlier Patents Rules, 1972. The major
amendments were:
The protection term of 20 years for all inventions from the date of filing.
Simplification of procedures.
Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005 : With the rapidly changing scenario of IPR at a
global level, a need was felt to further amend the Patent Act, 1970. The highlight of the
Patents (Amendments) Act 2005 were:
90
Page
Extension of grace period from 6 months to 12 months for filing a patent, if published
in government exhibition.
The concept of copyrights started way back in the 15th century. However, the actual
need for copyright law was felt only after the invention of printers and copiers. Before
the invention of printers, writing could be created only once. It was highly laborious, and
the risk of errors was involved in the manual process of copying by a scribe.
During the 15th and 16th centuries, printing was invented and widely established in Eu-
rope. Copies of ‘Bibles’ were the first to be printed. The government had allowed the
printing of the documents without any restrictions, but this led to the spreading of a lot
of governmental information. Subsequently, the government started issuing licenses for
printing.
Phases of Copyrights Law in India: The evolution of copyright law in India oc-
curred in three phases. The first two phases were enacted during the British Raj.
91
Page
1. First Phase (1847) : In the first phase, the concept of copyrights was introduced
in 1847 through an enactment during the East India Company’s regime. The term
of copyrights was for the lifetime of the author plus seven years after death. Unlike
today, copyrights in work were not automatic. The registration of copyright was
mandatory for the enforcement of rights under the Act. The government could grant
a compulsory license to publish a book if the owner of the copyright, upon the death
of the author, refused to allow its publication.
2. Second Phase (1914): In the second phase, the Indian legislature, under the
British Raj, enacted the Copyright Act of 1914 based on the Imperial Copyright Act
(1911) of the UK. An Act for criminal sanction for an infringement was introduced.
3. Third Phase (1957) : The third phase of the copyrights regime was witnessed
post-independence. The Copyright Act 1957 was enacted, superseding the Indian
Copyright Act, 1914, to suit the provisions of the Berne Convention (1886). The
1957 Act has been amended six times (1983, 1984, 1992, 1994, 1999, 2012) to
comply with the WIPO Copyright Treaty (WCT), 1996, and WIPO Performances
and Phonograms Treaty (WPPT), 1996.
The first statutory law related to Trademarks (TM) in India was the Trade Marks Act,
1940, which was carved out from the Trade Marks Act, 1938 of the UK. It was followed by
92
Page
the incorporation of provisions of TM stated in the Indian Penal Code, Criminal Procedure
Code, and the Sea Customs Act. Later on, Trade Marks Act, 1940 was rechristened as
Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958. Nearly four decades later, this Act was repealed
by the Trade Marks Act, 1999. The need for this occurred to comply with the provisions
of the TRIPS. It is the current governing law related to registered TM.
In India, Trade Secrets are protected despite the absence of specific laws dedicated to
them. Courts have recognized and upheld Trade Secrets protection through different
statutes(laws) like contract law, Copyright law, principles of equity, and the common law
action of breach of confidence, effectively treating it as a breach of contractual obligation.
In the 21st century, Information Technology (IT) has revolutionized the economic and
societal growth of the world economy. The rapid and tremendous scientific advancements
in the field of IT resulted in the creation of a new class of IP called the Layout-Design of
the Semiconductor Integrated Circuits.
SICLD Act, 2000: India, being a member of the WTO, also passed an Act called
the SICLD Act, 2000. This Act is TRIPS compliant and fulfills the conditions of the
93
Page
Plant Varieties: Historical Overview : Till the 1970s, not much emphasis was laid on
patentable matter originating from animals and plants. However, microbes and microbial
products/processes were patentable.
Introduction of Sui Generis Law : To include all kinds of biological materials under
the ambit of patent laws, a decision to enact a new sui generis law under the International
Convention for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV, 1978) and UPOV, 1991
was taken. These decisions were made to address environmental and public interest con-
cerns.
Definition: Traditional Knowledge (TK) is the ancient and indigenous knowledge held
by any community or a group of people. In olden times, it was not recorded anywhere
and was available only in oral form. So, Traditional Knowledge (TK) was verbally passed
on to future generations.
Scope: TK is not limited to a particular field. It covers a wide area, such as the use
of plants or their extracts for medical treatments, a traditional form of dance, particular
techniques used for hunting, craft knowledge/skills, and so on.
Transmission: Though there is no official record, some forms of TK find appearance in
the culture, stories, legends, folklore, rituals, songs, etc. Previously, there was no mech-
anism available to protect TK, but now, it has been recognized as Intellectual Property
Rights (IPR) under the TRIPS Agreement.
Government Initiative: The Government of India has created a digital library termed
as Traditional Knowledge Digital Library (TKDL) as a repository of 2,50,000 formulations
94
Page
A design is a creation of the human mind, which is appealing to the eyes and attracts the
attention of the viewers. The need to protect Industrial Designs (ID) was recognized in
the 18th century, leading to the enactment of the ‘Patterns and Designs Act’ in 1872 for
the first time.
In order to fill the gaps existing in the IP Laws and Acts and also to introduce new
guidelines/directions based on the current scenario (socially and politically), each nation
keeps on updating the concerned IP Laws and Acts. Some of the salient amendments
made in Indian Laws and Acts on IPR are mentioned below :
Patents
1. 1856: The Act VI of 1856 on the protection of inventions based on the British
Patent Law of 1852.
2. 1859:
3. 1883:
4. 1911: Renamed as ‘The Indian Patent and Design Act’ and brought under the
management of ‘Controller of Patents.’
5. 1930:
6. 1945:
7. 1949: Dedicated Committee formed under the leadership of Justice Bakshi Tek
Chand for reviewing the patent system as per the national environment.
8. 1950:
9. 1952:
11. 1967:
12. 1970: The Patent Act, 1970 passed by the Parliament Committee.
13. 1972: The Patent Act, 1970 came into force with the introduction of patent rules.
97
Page
14. 1995: TRIPS Agreement was signed by India and got a transition period 1995-2005
to make domestic laws compatible with TRIPS.
15. 1999:
Introducing the provisions for receiving the applications for the product patent
in the field of pharmaceuticals and agro-chemicals (mailbox).
Provisions for the grant of EMRs for distribution and sale of pharma products
on fulfillment of certain conditions.
Grant of EMR subject to certain conditions. (After the amendments (1999),
the product patents related to the pharmaceuticals and agrochemicals were
kept on hold for examination till 2005. It is called a mailbox or black box.)
16. 2002:
18. 2005:
Product patent for inventions in all fields of technology, including food, drug,
chemicals, and microorganisms.
New forms of known substances excluded to prevent the ever-greening of the
patent.
Introduction of pre-grant opposition.
Introduction of post-grant opposition.
Extension of grace period to 12 months.
19. 1847:
20. 1914: Copyright Act, 1914 was introduced based on the Imperial Copyright Act,
1911 of the UK.
21. 1957: Copyright Act, 1914 was replaced with Copyright Act, 1957 with minor
modifications.
24. 2012:
Trademarks
27. 1958: The Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 enacted as per TRIPS Agree-
ment.
28. 1999: Amended to avoid duplicity and ensure securing proprietors’ trade and good-
will.
30. 2010:
Geographical Indications
32. 1999: Being a member of the World Trade Organization (TRIPS), GI of goods
(Registration and Protection) Act was introduced.
33. 2002: The Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Rules,
2002 was introduced.
34. 2003: The Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration & Protection) Act came
into force.
Designs
35. 1872: Patterns and Designs Protection Act introduced for the protection of new
patterns and designs.
36. 1888: Amended as Invention and Design Act, 1988 for the protection of new inven-
tions and designs.
38. 2000: Design Act, 2000 was introduced; separated from the Indian Patent and
Design Act.
40. 2000: Semiconductor Integrated Circuits Layout Design (SICLD) Act 2000 intro-
duced as a signatory of WTO.
42. 1970: The Patent Act, 1970 excluded plants and animals in whole or in any part
from patentability (in 1999 amendments).
100
Page
43. 1991: Enactment of protection of new varieties of plants on a sui generis basis on
the lines of UPOV.
44. 2001: In line with TRIPS Agreement enactment of PPV&FR Act was introduced.
Biological Diversity
45. 2002: The Biological Diversity Act, 2002 introduced on the lines of the Convention
on Biological Diversity (CBD, 1992).
46. 2003:
Patents
Trademark
Trade Secrets
Industrial Designs
Geographical Indications
3.8 Patents
A patent is an exclusive right granted for an innovation that generally provides a new way
of doing something or offers a new technical solution to a problem. The exclusive right
legally protects the invention from being copied or reproduced by others. In return, the
invention must be disclosed in an application in a manner sufficiently clear and complete
to enable it to be replicated by a person with an ordinary level of skill in the relevant
field.
There is a set criterion, as provided in Section 2(1)(j) of the Patents Act, 1970, which
must be fulfilled for a product or a process to qualify for the grant of a patent. The
criterion encompasses:
Novelty - Not part of ‘State of the Art’. The innovation claimed in the patent
application is new and not known to anybody in the world. In other words, the
innovation is a) not in the knowledge of the public, b) not published anywhere
through any means of publication, and c) not claimed in any other specification by
any other applicant.
Inventive Step - Not obvious to the person(s) skilled in the art. The innovation
is a) a technical advancement over the existing knowledge, b) possesses economic
significance, and c) not obvious to a person skilled in the concerned subject.
Once an invention has been developed, the inventor has to decide whether to exploit the
invention for personal benefits as provided by the statutory laws of the country or put
it in the public domain. By and large, the inventor prefers the former option. Only a
minuscule of inventions are placed in the public domain without claiming any benefits.
In the latter case, anybody can exploit the innovation for commercial or societal benefit
102
Page
If the owner of an invention wishes to seek monetary gains, he can choose from either
of the two options, i.e. patenting or Trade Secret. If the inventor is absolutely sure of
maintaining the secrecy of the invention for a very long period (maybe 100 years or more)
and the probability of reverse engineering of the technology is nil or very low, then the
‘Trade Secret’ category is preferred. If the invention has a short life span or can be kept
secret only for a small period of time (a couple of years or so) or the probability of reverse
engineering is high once the invention is in the public domain, then the ‘patent’ category
is preferred.
As per the Court of Law, a patent owner has the right to decide who may or may not use
the patented invention. In other words, the patent protection provided by the law states
that the invention cannot be commercially made, used, distributed, imported, or sold by
others without the patent owner’s consent. The patent owner may permit other parties
to use the invention on mutually agreed terms. As a matter of fact, the patent rights are
negative rights as the owner is restricting others from using the patent in any manner
without his prior permission. The patent holder may choose to sue the infringing party
to stop illegal use of the patent and also ask for compensation for the unauthorized use.
Enforcement is the process of ensuring compliance with laws, regulations, rules, standards,
and social norms. Patent rights are usually enforced by the judicial courts. The Court
of Law has the authority to stop patent infringement. However, the main responsibility
for monitoring, identifying, and taking action against infringers of a patent lies with the
patent owner.
103
Page
Range of Patentable Inventions: Patents may cover inventions in diverse fields, from
everyday items like paper clips to advanced technologies such as nanotechnology chips or
genetically modified organisms.
Misconceptions about Patent Awards: Contrary to common belief, patents are not
exclusive to major scientific breakthroughs. Many patents are granted for incremental
improvements over existing inventions.
The Patent Act, 1970 outlines certain exclusions regarding products and processes that
are not eligible for patents. These exclusions include:
Frivolous Invention
Examples: Dough supplemented with herbs merely changing the taste, a 100 years calen-
dar, bus timetable.
104
Page
Inventions falling within Section 20(1) of the Atomic Energy Act, 1962
Examples: Inventions related to compounds of Uranium, Beryllium, Thorium, Plutonium,
Radium, Graphite, Lithium, and more as notified by the Central Government.
Once a patent is granted to the applicant, they gain the exclusive right to use or exploit
the invention in any capacity. Unauthorized use of the invention without prior permission
from the owner constitutes patent infringement. Infringements can be categorized into
two types:
Indirect Infringement
Occurs when some amount of deceit or accidental infringement happens without any
intentional infringement.
In case of patent infringement, the patentee has the right to sue the infringer through
judicial intervention. Countries have specific laws to address such unlawful acts, and the
patentee may seek the following reliefs:
Interlocutory/Interim Injunction
Permanent Injunction
It is essential to note that the Central government retains the right (Section 100 of the
Patent Act, 1970, Rule 32 of the Patent Rules, 2003) to use the invention in cases of
national emergency or other circumstances of extreme urgency after notifying the owner.
Generally, an invention that has been either published or publicly displayed cannot be
patented, as the claimed invention will lose the ‘Novelty’ criterion. However, under certain
circumstances, the Patents Act provides a grace period of 12 months for filing a patent
application from the date of its publication in a journal or presentation in a reputed
scientific society or exhibition.
In India, the process of granting a patent is a lengthy procedure that may take anywhere
from 3-4 years or more. The major steps involved in this process are:
5. Publication,
6. Pre-grant Opposition,
7. Examination,
8. Grant of a Patent,
Some major steps involved in this process are listed in the following figure.
either before the filing of the patent application or the priority date of the patent appli-
cation claiming the invention, is termed as Prior Art.
Conducting a prior art search before filing the patent has advantages as it averts infringe-
ment, tracks research and development, and provides access to detailed information on
the invention. The prior art search is carried out on the parameters such as novelty,
patentability, state of the art, infringement, validity, and freedom to operate. The com-
monly used databases for prior art search fall into two categories: Patents Databases and
NPL.
Patents’ Databases :
PROQUEST (https://about.proquest.com/search/?searchKeyword=patent+).
Although the majority of NPL data is available freely on the public forum, some of the
journals are paid and can be accessed after paying the subscription. Major Patent Offices
such as the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s (USPTO), European Patent
Office (EPO), Japan Patent Office (JPO), etc. are maintaining in-house NPL databases
to make patents examination more effective.
2.Choice of Application to be Filed - Once a decision has been made to patent the in-
vention, the next step is, what kind of application needs to be filed i.e. provisional patent
application or complete (Final) patent application - generally, the provisional patent ap-
plication is preferred for the following reasons:
Any improvements made in the invention after the filing of the provisional applica-
tion can be included in the final application. In other words, the provisional appli-
cation does not require complete specifications of the inventions. The application
can be filed even though some data is yet to be collected from pending experiments.
A provisional application allows you to secure a priority date for the patent applied.
However, it is mandatory to file the complete patent application within one year of the
filing of the provisional application; otherwise, the application stands rejected.
As per the Patent Act, 1970 (Section 39) and the Patents Rules, 2003 (Rule 7, 54,
135 and subrule (1) of rule 20, the application for the grant of patent is filed using
Form-1 and Form-2.
Whereas Form-2 seeks technical information and whether to file the provisional
application or complete the application.
For ‘Provisional Application’, only ‘Description of the Invention’ and the ‘Abstract’
is to be furnished. Whereas, ‘Complete Application’ requires ‘Description of the
Invention’, ‘Abstract’, ‘Claims’ and the manner in which invention has to be per-
formed.
109
Page
The ‘Claims’ of the patent are a very crucial part of the specifications because they
define the actual boundary of the invention.
‘Claims’ specify what is actually claimed by the invention and what is being sought
to be protected. It clearly describes what the patent does and does not cover.
The Claims must be drafted precisely and carefully in order to seek patent protection
and also to protect the invention against potential infringers.
India has four offices for filing patent applications(Refer the following table).
The applications can be filed only in one of the offices based on the applicant’s
residence or domicile or place of business or origin of the invention. These are
termed as jurisdictions to file patents.
For a foreign applicant, the address for service in India or place of business of his
patent agent determines the appropriate Patent Office for filing a patent application.
110
Page
In the case of joint applications, all the applicants are bestowed with equal rights
and consideration.
5. Publication:
Once the patent application has been filed at the Regional Patent Office, the patent
application is kept secret for 18 months in the Patent Office.
After the expiry of 18 months (from the date of filing of the application or the pri-
ority claimed date, whichever is earlier), the application is published in the Official
Journal of Patent Office (http://www.ipindia.nic.in/journalpatents.htm).
The purpose of publishing the application is to inform the public about the invention.
The publication of an application is a mandatory step.
6. Pre-grant Opposition:
Depending on the outcome of the case, the patent application may be rejected or
recommended for the next step, i.e. patent examination.
Although the patent application is kept secret for 18 months, under special circum-
stances, this period can be reduced when the patentee(A person/Organization who
owns the patent (granted))/applicant plans to sell or license the patent or seek an
investor.
For this, the applicant has to fill a Form-9 and submit it to the Controller General.
7. Examination:
Patent examination is a critical step in the process of grant of a patent. All the
important criteria (novel, inventive step, etc.) are scrutinized by the professionals
depending on the content of the invention.
The applicant or his representative has to make a request for examination of the
patent by filing Form-18A and submitting the same within 48 months from the date
of filing of the application.
8. Grant of a Patent:
After fulfilling all the requirements for the grant of a patent, including all objec-
tions/queries raised by the ‘Patent Examiner’ and the public at large, the patent is
granted to the applicant.
The granted patent is published in the Official Journal of the Patent Office.
This journal is published every Friday and contains information related to patent
applications published under section (u/s) 11A, post-grant publication, restoration
of patent, notifications, list of non-working patents and public notices issued by the
Patent Office.
Once a patent is granted for an invention in India, the next vital step is to ensure
that it is renewed annually by paying Patent Renewal Fee as per Section 53, Rule 80
of the Indian Patents Act, till the expiry of the patent grant period. Non-payment
of Patent Renewal Fee might result in the cancellation of the patent.
In some countries, patent protection may be extended beyond 20 years. The ex-
tension aims to compensate for the time expended on the administrative approval
procedure before products can be put on the market.
The time taken for this procedure means that the patent owner may sometimes not
be able to benefit from his right for a considerable period after the grant of the
patent.
10. Post-grant Opposition : Once the patent has been granted by the Patent Office,
it still can be challenged by anyone within one year from the date of publication of the
grant of the patent. The granted patent can be challenged either via a Patent Office or
112
Page
in a Court of Law. These bodies may invalidate or revoke a patent upon a successful
challenge by the interested party on the grounds mentioned below :
The applicant for the patent wrongfully obtained the invention or any part of the
invention.
The invention claimed has been published before the priority date.
The invention claimed was publicly known/used before the priority date.
The invention claimed is obvious and does not involve an inventive step.
The subject of the claim is not patentable as per Chapter II of the Patent Act, 1970.
A patent owner may grant a license to a third party for the reasons mentioned
below:
– The patent owner has a decent job (e.g., university professor) and has no desire
or aptitude to exploit the patent on his own.
– The patent owner may not have the necessary manufacturing facilities.
– The manufacturing facility is not able to meet the market demand.
– The patent owner wishes to concentrate on one geographic market; for other
geographical markets, he may choose to license the patent rights.
Once the patent is granted, the patentee (person holding the rights to the patent)
enjoys the exclusive rights to use the patented invention.
Only the patentee has the right to license or deal with the patent for any delibera-
tions. Although the validity of the granted patent is for 20 years (from the date of
filing a patent application), the patentee is required to furnish information (Form-
27) annually relating to the commercialization/selling of the patent. It is called as
’Working/Licensing of the Patent’.
113
Page
If the patentee is not able to commercialize his patent within three years from the
date of the grant of a patent, any person may submit an application to the Controller
of Patents for the grant of Compulsory Licensing (of the patent), subject to the
fulfillment of the following conditions:
In general, applicants can prepare their patent applications and file them without
assistance from a patent attorney.
Furthermore, the legislation of many countries requires that an applicant, whose or-
dinary residence or principal place of business is outside the country, be represented
by an attorney or agent qualified in the country (which usually means an agent or
attorney who resides and practices in that country).
An application for a patent must be filed with a Patent Office of the country in
which one wishes to seek patent protection. Unfortunately, this option becomes
laborious, cumbersome, timeconsuming and expensive if one wishes to file a patent
application in many countries.
To ease out this issue, many Regional Offices have been established which receive
patent applications on behalf of a group of nations e.g. European Patent Office and
African Regional Intellectual Property Organization.
A single application is sufficient to cover many nations that are members of a par-
ticular regional office/organization.
The only condition is that the applicant’s country should be a member of PCT.
India, along with over 190 nations, is a member of PCT.
Yes, in general, Indian residents are required to file the patent application first in India.
Subsequently, they may file for patent protection in other countries. However, prior
approval is needed from the Patent Office. This approval can be waived off under the
following circumstances:
If 6 weeks have expired since the patent application was filed in India by an Indian
resident.
If two or more inventors are working on an invention in a foreign country and one of
the inventors is an Indian resident. The invention does not have a potential market
in India, and hence the Indian resident seeks Foreign Filing Permission (FFP) from
an Indian Patent Office.
If the invention is related to defense or atomic energy or utility model, the inventor(s)
need to seek permission from the Indian Patent Office because inventions related to
these domains are not the subject matter of patentability in India.
There are over 30 patent-related forms. Some of Important Patent Application Forms are
mentioned below.
As per the Patent Act, 1970, and The Patents Rules (1972), the requisite fee has been
specified based on the type of form/s to be submitted to the Office (See the Table).
Electronically filed applications are 10% cheaper than physical filing.
116
Page
There are certain terms that are commonly used in the field of patenting, as listed in
following table.
1. The Indian Patent Office (IPO): The Office of the Controller General of Patents,
Designs and Trade Marks generally known as the Indian Patent Office, is an agency
under the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade which admin-
isters the Indian law of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks.
In many cases, a new invention involves an incremental improvement over the existing
products, but this technical improvement is not sufficient enough to pass the stringent
criterion of ‘Novelty’ and ‘Non-obviousness’ set aside for the grant of a patent. Such
small innovations can still be legally protected in some countries and termed as ‘Utility
Models’ or ‘Petty Patents’ or ‘Innovation Patents’. In this case, the criterion of
‘Novelty’ and ‘Non-obviousness’ are diluted or relinquished. But the requirement of in-
dustrial application or utility is the same as that for patents.
Definition of Utility Models : Utility Models, also known as ’Petty Patents’ or ’In-
novation Patents,’ represent a form of intellectual property protection for incremental
improvements over existing products.
Differences from Patents: While patents demand a higher threshold for ’Novelty’
120
Page
and ’Non-obviousness,’ Utility Models provide a more accessible option for smaller inno-
vations. The industrial application or utility requirement remains consistent with patents.
Benefits for MSMEs : Utility Models serve as a valuable tool for Micro, Small, and
Medium Enterprises (MSMEs), offering a less rigorous and cost-effective alternative to
patents. This is particularly beneficial for MSMEs with limited resources for intensive
research and development.
Duration and Global Recognition : The lifespan of a Utility Model is typically shorter
than patents, varying from 7-15 years in different countries. Approximately 80 countries,
including France, Germany, Japan, South Korea, China, Finland, Russian Federation,
and Spain, recognize and provide protection for Utility Models under their Intellectual
Property Rights (IPR) laws.
Current Status in India: As of now, India does not officially recognize utility patents.
The inclusion of utility patents in India’s IP protection framework could significantly
impact the annual number of filed and granted patents.
Additional Information
The patent system in India is governed by the Patents Act, 1970 (No.39 of 1970) as
amended by the Patents (Amendment) Act 2005 and the Patents Rules, 2003. The
Patent Rules are regularly amended in accordance with the changing environment, with
the most recent update in 2020.
Historical Note : The first patent filed in India dates back to 3rd March 1856. George
Alfred DePenning, a civil engineer and inventor from Calcutta, India, submitted the first
petition for the grant of Exclusive Privileges (a term used for patents at that time) for
his invention called ’An Efficient Punkah-Pulling Machine’. This patent marked the in-
ception of the patenting tradition in India.
Impactful Patents: Edison’s Electric Bulb (1880) Patent Number: US 223 898
121
Page
Most Patents Granted : Japanese inventor Shunpei Yamazaki holds the record for
the maximum number of patents (9700) granted in a span of 49 years (1972-December
2020) at an impressive rate of 196 patents per year.
Most Patents Granted to a Person of Indian Origin : Gurtej Sandhu holds the
record for the maximum number of patents (1299) granted to a person of Indian origin
in a span of 30 years (1991-December 2020) at the rate of 43 patents per year.
Question Bank
1. How does Intellectual Property (IP) play a crucial role in the economic and cul-
tural development of society. (or) Describe the role of Intellectual Property in the
economic and cultural development of a society
2. Examine and elucidate the roles played by national agencies and international or-
ganizations in the governance of intellectual property (IP).
4. Analyze the origin of IP and the major amendments in IP laws and acts in India.
6. Analyze the notable amendments made to intellectual property (IP) laws and acts
in India, considering key changes, legislative developments, and their implications
across different IP domains.
7. Discuss the categories of non-patentable matters (or) What types of inventions are
not patentable in India?
9. Describe what types of inventions are eligible for patenting and which ones are not.
Support your answer with examples.
10. Elaborate on the steps and requirements involved in the patenting process in India.
11. Explain the meaning of ’Prior Art Search’ and emphasize its significance in the
process of patenting. Also, provide an outline of how to conduct it.
12. Discuss the difference between Pre-grant Opposition and Post-grant Opposition in
the context of patenting. How do they serve to maintain the validity of patent
protection?
13. Can one obtain a worldwide patent or first need to file a patent in India? Discuss
with all the procedures involved.
15. Discuss the process of patenting an invention and the conditions for obtaining a
patent.
16. What are the rights associated with patents and how can they be enforced? (or)
Discuss the rights given to patent holders and outline the methods used for enforcing
these rights.
17. What are the different types of Patent Applications? Illustrate with examples.
18. Describe the types of patent applications and the need for a patent attorney or
agent in the process of patenting.
19. Explore the concept of Patent Infringements and the measures to avoid them.
20. Explain the effect of public disclosure of an invention before patenting and the
significance of choosing the proper jurisdiction for filing a patent application.
21. Discuss the concept and importance of Utility models in contrast to patents. What
economic and innovation-driven implications does each carry?
22. Why is the choice of application crucial in the patenting process and how does it
influence the jurisdiction of filing a Patent Application?
23. Evaluate the evolution of copyright laws in India with a focus on the amendments
made in the digital age. How have these changes addressed emerging challenges?
24. Compare and contrast the evolution of trademark laws in India before and after the
Trade Marks Act of 1999. Highlight the major changes and their implications.
123
Page
25. Trace the evolution of plant varieties protection in India from the exclusion under
the Indian Patents Act, 1970, to the enactment of the Protection of Plant Varieties
and Farmers’ Rights Act, 2001.
26. Analyze the role of the National Biodiversity Action Plan, 2009, in biodiversity
conservation in India. Highlight key provisions and their implications.
27. Explain the amendments made to the Indian Patents Act in 2005 and their signifi-
cance in the context of global Intellectual Property standards.
28. Discuss the decision-making process an inventor goes through when determining
whether to patent an invention or place it in the public domain, emphasizing the
factors that influence this choice
30. Explore the concept of exclusive and non-exclusive licenses in the context of patent
commercialization, providing examples of each and discussing their implications.
31. Examine the role and importance of a patent attorney/agent in the process of draft-
ing and filing patent applications?
32. Evaluate the concept of a ’Worldwide Patent’ and discuss why patent rights are
considered territorial.
33. Can a worldwide patent be obtained? Explain. (or) Can a worldwide patent be
obtained? Explain the process, benefits and drawbacks of obtaining a worldwide
patent.
34. What is the pre-grant and post-grant opposition in patent law, and how do they
differ?
35. Discuss the general requirement for Indian residents to first file a patent application
in India before seeking protection in other countries
36. What is the significance of utility models in patent law? Discuss some commonly
used terms in patenting.
37. Discuss the concept of Patent Infringements and demonstrate how public disclosure
of an invention before patenting can lead to it.
124
Page
38. Describe what types of inventions are eligible for patenting and which ones are not.
Support your answer with examples.
39. Explain the meaning of ’Prior Art Search’ and emphasize its significance in the
process of patenting. Also, provide an outline of how to conduct it.
40. What role does a Patent Attorney/Agent play in the patenting process?
41. Explain the role of intellectual property in both economic and cultural development
within a society.
42. Discuss the historical origin and evolution of intellectual property in India.
43. Explain the essential conditions that an invention must fulfill to obtain patent pro-
tection.
44. Outline the step-by-step process of patenting an invention, from prior art search to
publication and grant.