3
3
have analyzed.[34]
Security
"Edit war" redirects here. Not to be confused with Edit conflict. For Wikipedia's
policy on edit warring, see Wikipedia:Edit warring.
Trolling and cybervandalism on wikis, where content is changed to something
deliberately incorrect or a hoax, offensive material or nonsense is added, or
content is maliciously removed, can be a major problem. On larger wiki sites it is
possible for such changes to go unnoticed for a long period.
Disagreements between users over the content or appearance of pages may cause edit
wars, where competing users repetitively change a page back to a version that they
favor. Some wiki software allows administrators to prevent pages from being
editable until a decision has been made on what version of the page would be most
appropriate.[3]
Some wikis may be subject to external structures of governance which address the
behavior of persons with access to the system, for example in academic contexts.
[25]
Communities
Applications
In 2005, the Gartner Group, noting the increasing popularity of wikis, estimated
that they would become mainstream collaboration tools in at least 50% of companies
by 2009.[42][needs update] Wikis can be used for project management.[43][44]
[unreliable source] Wikis have also been used in the academic community for sharing
and dissemination of information across institutional and international boundaries.
[45] In those settings, they have been found useful for collaboration on grant
writing, strategic planning, departmental documentation, and committee work.[46] In
the mid-2000s, the increasing trend among industries toward collaboration placed a
heavier impetus upon educators to make students proficient in collaborative work,
inspiring even greater interest in wikis being used in the classroom.[3]
Wikis have found some use within the legal profession and within the government.
Examples include the Central Intelligence Agency's Intellipedia, designed to share
and collect intelligence assessments, DKosopedia, which was used by the American
Civil Liberties Union to assist with review of documents about the internment of
detainees in Guant�namo Bay;[47] and the wiki of the United States Court of Appeals
for the Seventh Circuit, used to post court rules and allow practitioners to
comment and ask questions. The United States Patent and Trademark Office operates
Peer-to-Patent, a wiki to allow the public to collaborate on finding prior art
relevant to the examination of pending patent applications. Queens, New York has
used a wiki to allow citizens to collaborate on the design and planning of a local
park. Cornell Law School founded a wiki-based legal dictionary called Wex, whose
growth has been hampered by restrictions on who can edit.[32]
In academic contexts, wikis have also been used as project collaboration and
research support systems.[48][49]
City wikis
A city wiki or local wiki is a wiki used as a knowledge base and social network for
a specific geographical locale.[50][51][52] The term city wiki is sometimes also
used for wikis that cover not just a city, but a small town or an entire region.
Such a wiki contains information about specific instances of things, ideas, people
and places. Such highly localized information might be appropriate for a wiki
targeted at local viewers, and could include:
Legal environment
Joint authorship of articles, in which different users participate in correcting,
editing, and compiling the finished product, can also cause editors to become
tenants in common of the copyright, making it impossible to republish without
permission of all co-owners, some of whose identities may be unknown due to
pseudonymous or anonymous editing.[3] Some copyright issues can be alleviated
through the use of an open content license. Version 2 of the GNU Free Documentation
License includes a specific provision for wiki relicensing, and Creative Commons
licenses are also popular. When no license is specified, an implied license to read
and add content to a wiki may be deemed to exist on the grounds of business
necessity and the inherent nature of a wiki.
Wikis and their users can be held liable for certain activities that occur on the
wiki. If a wiki owner displays indifference and forgoes controls (such as banning
copyright infringers) that they could have exercised to stop copyright
infringement, they may be deemed to have authorized infringement, especially if the
wiki is primarily used to infringe copyrights or obtains a direct financial
benefit, such as advertising revenue, from infringing activities.[3] In the United
States, wikis may benefit from Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which
protects sites that engage in "Good Samaritan" policing of harmful material, with
no requirement on the quality or quantity of such self-policing.[55] It has also
been argued that a wiki's enforcement of certain rules, such as anti-bias,
verifiability, reliable sourcing, and no-original-research policies, could pose
legal risks.[56] When defamation occurs on a wiki, theoretically, all users of the
wiki can be held liable, because any of them had the ability to remove or amend the
defamatory material from the "publication". It remains to be seen whether wikis
will be regarded as more akin to an internet service provider, which is generally
not held liable due to its lack of control over publications' contents, than a
publisher.[3] It has been recommended that trademark owners monitor what
information is presented about their trademarks on wikis, since courts may use such
content as evidence pertaining to public perceptions, and they can edit entries to
rectify misinformation.[57]
Conferences
Active conferences and meetings about wiki-related topics include: