Module V
Module V
Definition
• According to Dunlop, “IR is the complex of inter – relations among workers,
managers, and government.”
• According to Dale Yoder, “IR is a relationship between management and employees
or among employees and their organizations that help both the organization and the
employees to grow.”
Nature
• According to Dunlop, “IR is the complex of inter – relations among workers,
managers, and government.”
• According to Dale Yoder, “IR is a relationship between management and employees
or among employees and their organizations that help both the organization and the
employees to grow.”
Objectives
• Complex Relationship
• Mixture of Cooperation and Conflicts
• Participative in nature
• Dispute settlement
• Trade unions
• Collective Bargaining
• Grievance Redressal
Nature of RE/ IR
• Protect workers and Management’s interest
• Improves economic status of workers
• Regulates control of government
• Ensure workers participation
• Develop and support labor unions
• Prevent industrial conflict
• Reduce strikes and lockouts
• Increases productivity
Actors
• Worker and their organization
• Employee and their organization
• Government
• Trade unions
• Employers
• Court and tribunals
Determinants
• The difference of opinion between the workers and the management
• The management’s attitude towards workers and the union and vice-versa
• The workers’ attitude towards the unions
• The dominance of one union over the others
• The grievance handling procedures
• The effectiveness of the concerned managers in handling workplace disputes
• The prosperity of the organisation and the availability of employment opportunities
within
• Measures for preserving and ensuring healthy relations between employees and the
employer
• Mechanism to investigate and resolve industrial disputes
• Mechanism to provide adequate representation to the union/employees
• Avoidance of strikes and lockouts by all concerned parties
• Participation of employees in collective bargaining
• The context and nature of the industry
Approaches / Perspective
• Psychological Approach
• Sociological Approach
• Human Relations Approach
• Systems Approach
• Dunlop’s Approach
• Oxford Approach
• Industrial Sociology Approach
• Action Theory Approach
• Weber’s Social Action Approach
• Gandhian Approach
Unitarist Perspective : In unitarism, the organization is perceived as an integrated and
harmonious whole with the ideal of "one happy family", where management and other
members of the staff all share a common purpose, emphasizing mutual cooperation.
Furthermore, unitarism has a paternalistic approach where it demands loyalty of all
employees, being predominantly managerial in its emphasis and application.
• Consequently, trade unions are deemed as unnecessary since the loyalty between
employees and organizations are considered mutually exclusive, where there can't
be two sides of industry.
Pluralist perspective
• Oxford Approach
• Oxford Approach is promoted by Flandars.
• Business is a social system with a structure of relationships
• The industrial relations field is a study of institutions of job regulations such as work
rules, wages structure, grievance procedures and trade unions.
• formula
• r=f(b), or r= f(c)
• r= rules governing industrial relation
• b= collective bargaining
• c= conflict resolved through collective bargaining.
• This Approach focusses on political process of collective bargaining and side line
aspects such as technology, market and ideology.
•
THE INDUSTRIAL SOCIOLOGY APPROACH
• G. Margerison, an industrial sociologist, holds the view that the core of industrial
relations is the nature and development of the conflict itself.
• He proposed the cause of conflicts more thoroughly than their solution.
• According to him industrial relations occur in 2 situations
• A. within a plant: job content, technology, interaction- create three types of
conflicts- structural, distributive and human relations oriented.
• B. it includes conflicts that are not resolved within organisation
the ACTION THEORY APPROACH
• The action theory approach takes the collective regulation of industrial labour as its
focal point. The actors operate within a framework, which can at best be described
as a coalition relationship.
THE HUMAN RELATIONS APPROACH
• In the words of Keith Davies, human relations are “the integration of people into a
work situation that motivates them to work together productively, cooperatively and
with economic, psychological and social satisfactions.” According to him, the goals of
human relations are:
• (a) to get people to produce
• (b) to cooperate through mutuality of interest
• (c) to gain satisfaction from their relationships.
WEBER’S SOCIAL ACTION APPROACHTHE
1. This Approach emphasises on the power to control the context of bureaucratic
environment and work organisations.
2. It analyses the effect of politico-organisational and techno-economic changes on the
structure and process of trade union, the subjective interpretation of workers’
approach to trade union, and power of the employers, government, political parties
and unions.
THE GANDHIAN APPROACH
• Workers should seek rebred of just and reasonable demands through collective
actions.
• Trade unions should decide to go on strike taking ballot authority from all workers,
and remain peaceful using non violent methods.
• Workers should avoid strikes to the extent possible.
• Strikes are to be the last resort
• Workers should take recourse to voluntary arbitration where direct settlement fails.
Industrial disputes
• Industrial disputes are the differences between the employers and workers in an
industry and can take various forms of protest like strikes, gheraos, and
demonstration.
• These disputes can be from the workers’ side, such as retrenchment, dismissal, and
lockouts, or can be from the employer’s side.
• Whatever the source, the outcome of the protest is always loss of industrial
production and decline in the national income.
• Hence, it is essential to understand the nature and magnitude of industrial disputes
and know the factors responsible for their occurrence and measures to resolve
them.
Two types of industrial disputes:
• Interest Disputes: These disputes are also known as economic disputes. These
disputes arise due to terms and conditions of employment. They could be either out
of the claims made by the employees or offers given by the employers. These
disputes are settled by a collective agreement.
• Grievance or Rights Disputes: These disputes arise out of application or
interpretation of existing agreements or contracts between the employees and the
management. Such disputes are also called individual disputes, as they relate either
to an individual worker or a group of workers in the same group.
• The dispute must affect a large number of workmen who have a community of
interest, and the rights of these workmen must be affected as a class.
• The industry union or a substantial number of workmen must take up the dispute.
• The grievance can take the shape from an individual complaint to a general
complaint.
• The nexus between the union and the dispute must be visible.
• A workman has a right to raise an industrial dispute with respect to termination,
discharge, dismissal, or retrenchment of his/her service according to the guidelines
set in Section 2A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
Disputes Act, 1947
• Dynamic Process: It is a dynamic process and there is give and take on both sides.
The mental perspective and approaches may change during the negotiation process.
STRUCTURE
• Single Plant or Unit Level: Here, the bargaining is conducted between the
management and the representatives of a single factory or plant.
• Multiple Plants or Organisation Level: In organisations having multiple factories, the
result of collective bargaining in one factory would influence other factories even if
they are geographically distant.
• Multiple Employers or Industry Level: This system involves workers in the same
industry, through their federal unions, and the employers in that industry.
• National Level: Here, all trade unions having a common concern conduct collective
bargaining across industries.
OBJECTIVES
• The main objective of collective bargaining is to arrive at an agreement between the
employer and the workers. This agreement cannot force anyone to perform any
illegal activity. It can also not take away any right from any party, which is rightfully
theirs according to the Constitution.
• Collective bargaining deals with various topics including wages, welfare benefits,
working hours, promotions, and grievance processes.
BENEFITS
• A tool for social change
• A peace treaty
• A system for industrial jurisprudence
• A mechanism for structured and transparent grievance resolution
• Self-respect booster
• A tool for social change: It helps to enhance the status of workers in society and give
them a sense of dignity.
• A peace treaty: It serves as a peace treaty between the workers and the
management.
• A system for industrial jurisprudence: It helps in introducing civil rights at the
workplace.
• A mechanism for structured and transparent grievance resolution: It helps to
resolve grievances in a structured and transparent manner.
• Self-respect booster: The workers develop a sense of self-respect.
• A tool for social change: It helps to enhance the status of workers in society and give
them a sense of dignity.
• A peace treaty: It serves as a peace treaty between the workers and the
management.
• A system for industrial jurisprudence: It helps in introducing civil rights at the
workplace.
• A mechanism for structured and transparent grievance resolution: It helps to
resolve grievances in a structured and transparent manner.
• Self-respect booster: The workers develop a sense of self-respect.
FUNCTIONING OF COLLECTIVE BARGAINING
• Preparation
• Arguing
• Signalling
• Proposal
• Packaging
• Bargaining
• Closing
• Agreement
OBSTACLES IN COLLECTIVE BARGAINING
• Collective bargaining depends on the principals of both parties.
• It is difficult to build a consensus among workers.
• Collective bargaining takes a long duration.
• The decreasing power of unions has led to a decline in the practice of collective
bargaining.
• The global economy and international competition have forced organisations to
remain agile and flexible.