Scribd
Upload
11 views7 pages

Module 3

Empirical Risk Minimization (ERM) is a key concept in machine learning aimed at minimizing prediction error by optimizing a loss function based on empirical data. Challenges in neural network optimization include issues like overfitting, local minima, saddle points, and vanishing gradients, which complicate the training process. Adaptive algorithms like AdaGrad and Adam provide solutions by dynamically adjusting learning rates, though they also have limitations such as potential premature convergence and sensitivity to initial conditions.

Uploaded by

Hemanth Hemanth
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
11 views7 pages

Module 3

Empirical Risk Minimization (ERM) is a key concept in machine learning aimed at minimizing prediction error by optimizing a loss function based on empirical data. Challenges in neural network optimization include issues like overfitting, local minima, saddle points, and vanishing gradients, which complicate the training process. Adaptive algorithms like AdaGrad and Adam provide solutions by dynamically adjusting learning rates, though they also have limitations such as potential premature convergence and sensitivity to initial conditions.

Uploaded by

Hemanth Hemanth
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

MODULE 3

Empirical Risk Minimization (ERM)

Empirical Risk Minimization (ERM) is a fundamental concept in machine


learning for reducing prediction error. It involves optimizing a loss function
that approximates the error on the training data. The expected
generalization error, also known as risk, is minimized using ERM by
substituting the true data distribution p(x,y) with its empirical distribution
p^(x,y) derived from the training dataset.

Challenges in ERM:

 Overfitting: Models with high capacity may memorize the training


set, leading to poor generalization.

 Non-differentiable Loss Functions: Certain loss functions (e.g.,


0-1 loss) are not directly optimizable via gradient-based methods.

 Generalization vs. Empirical Risk: Minimizing empirical risk does


not guarantee minimal generalization error.

02.Challenges in Neural Network Optimization

Neural network optimization involves finding parameters that minimize a


cost function. Despite advances in optimization techniques, several
challenges make this process complex, particularly for deep networks.
Here’s a detailed explanation of the challenges:
1. Ill-Conditioning

 The Hessian matrix of the cost function may have a poor condition
number, causing slow convergence.

 Even if the gradient is strong, small learning steps are necessary


due to high curvature, slowing down training.

 This is often observed when gradients become smaller than needed


to make meaningful updates.

2. Local Minima

 Non-convex functions, like those in deep neural networks, often


have numerous local minima.

 In practical neural networks, most local minima are found to have


low cost, making global minima less critical.

 This challenge is less significant but requires careful initialization


and optimization strategies.

3. Saddle Points

 Saddle points, where the gradient is zero but not a minimum, are
more common in high-dimensional spaces.

 The presence of both positive and negative eigenvalues in the


Hessian can cause gradients to oscillate or slow down progress.

 Escaping saddle points is vital for optimization efficiency.

4. Plateaus and Flat Regions

 These regions have low gradient magnitudes, causing optimization


to stagnate.

 Traversing plateaus can take significant time, delaying convergence.

5. Cliffs and Exploding Gradients

 Sharp nonlinearities in deep networks can lead to "cliffs" where


gradients are very large.

 Gradient updates in such regions can cause parameters to jump


drastically, leading to instability.
 Gradient clipping is often employed to manage this issue.

6. Vanishing Gradients

 In deep networks, gradients can become exponentially small as they


propagate backward.

 This prevents meaningful parameter updates, particularly in early


layers.

 Proper weight initialization and activation functions like ReLU help


mitigate this problem.

7. Poor Correspondence Between Local and Global Structures

 Local optimization steps may not align with the global cost
structure.

 This can result in long, inefficient trajectories in the parameter


space.

8. Inexact Gradients

 Gradient estimates are often noisy due to minibatch sampling.

 This noise can lead to suboptimal updates or instability during


training.

9. Long-Term Dependencies

 In recurrent networks, repeated multiplication of weights causes


gradients to either explode or vanish over time.

 This is especially problematic for learning dependencies over long


sequences.
03.Explanation of AdaGrad

AdaGrad (Adaptive Gradient Algorithm) is an adaptive learning rate


optimization algorithm. It modifies the learning rate dynamically for each
parameter during training. This is achieved by scaling the learning rates
inversely proportional to the square root of the sum of squared gradients
for each parameter.

Key Features:

1. Adaptive Learning Rates:

o Parameters with frequently large gradients see their learning


rate reduced, allowing slower updates.

o Parameters with small gradients retain higher learning rates,


enabling faster updates.

2. Application:

o Especially useful for sparse datasets where some parameters


update more frequently than others.

o Promotes faster convergence in such contexts.

3. Limitations:

o Gradual accumulation of squared gradients can make the


effective learning rate approach zero prematurely.
Explanation of the Adam Algorithm

The Adam (Adaptive Moment Estimation) algorithm is a widely used


optimization method in machine learning. It is an adaptive learning rate
method combining the advantages of two popular techniques:
Momentum and RMSProp. The name "Adam" is derived from "adaptive
moments," reflecting its reliance on exponentially weighted moving
averages of the gradients and their squares.
Key Features of Adam:

1. Adaptive Learning Rates:

o Learning rates are dynamically adjusted for each parameter.

o Parameters with frequently changing gradients are assigned


lower learning rates.

2. Incorporation of Momentum:

o Uses exponential weighting for past gradients, introducing


momentum into updates.

o Speeds up convergence and avoids oscillations in the


optimization path.

3. Second Moment Estimation:

o Tracks the uncentered variance of gradients (second moment).

o Helps scale updates more effectively.

4. Bias Correction:

o Corrects for initialization bias in the moving averages of the


first and second moments.
Hyperparameters:

 β1: Decay rate for the first moment (default is 0.9).

 β2Decay rate for the second moment (default is 0.999).

 ϵ\epsilon: Global learning rate (default is 0.001).

Advantages of Adam:

 Handles sparse gradients effectively.

 Combines the benefits of momentum and adaptive learning rates.

 Requires minimal hyperparameter tuning and performs well across


diverse tasks.

Limitations:

 May generalize less effectively in some cases due to aggressive


learning rate adjustments.

 Sensitive to initial learning rate choices in specific scenarios.

You might also like