0% found this document useful (0 votes)
15 views13 pages

Lecture 13 - Solidification Via Heterogeneous Nucleation - Voice Over

Uploaded by

KN Hui
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
15 views13 pages

Lecture 13 - Solidification Via Heterogeneous Nucleation - Voice Over

Uploaded by

KN Hui
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 13

EMA5001 Lecture 13

Solidification via
Heterogeneous Nucleation,
Growth of Pure Solid from Liquid
Heterogeneous Nucleation (1)

❑Actual solidification often involves mold wall, insoluble oxides, etc.,


which become substrates for heterogeneous nucleation
Assuming SL
Liquid
▪ ML is isotropic Solid

▪ Mold wall flat
Mold r SM ML
 ML =  SM +  SL Cos
Free energy change in heterogeneous nucleation

Ghet = −VS Gv + ASL SL + ASM  SM − ASM  ML Assuming sphere-cap geometry

Therefore,
4
VS = r 3 
(2 + Cos )(1 − Cos )
2

3 4
 4 
Ghet = − r 3 Gv + 4r 2 SL   S ( )
 3  ASL = 2r 2 (1 − Cos )

S ( ) =
(2 + Cos )(1 − Cos )
2
ASM = r 2 Sin 2
4

EMA 5001 Zhe Cheng 13 Heterogeneous Nucleation 2


Heterogeneous Nucleation (2)

❑Continue from previous G


 4 
Ghet = − r 3Gv + 4r 2 SL   S ( )
 3 
Remember for homogeneous nucleation
4 Ghom
*

Ghom = − r 3 Gv + 4r 2 SL Ghet


*
3
r
We have Ghet = Ghom  S ( )

0  S ( ) =
(2 + Cos )(1 − Cos )
2
1
4
Same critical nucleus radius Heterogeneous nucleation has the same
2 SL critical nucleus radius as for
*
rhet = rhom
*
=
Gv homogeneous nucleation, but lower
nucleation barrier (activation energy)

EMA 5001 Zhe Cheng 13 Heterogeneous Nucleation 3


Heterogeneous Nucleation (3)

❑Continue from previous S ( )


2 1.0
*
rhet = rhom
*
= SL
Gv 0.8
Critical nucleation energy
0.6  = 10o, S() = 0.00017
Ghet
*
= Ghom
*
 S ( ) 0.4
 = 30o, S() = 0.013
 = 60o, S() = 0.16
S ( ) =
(2 + Cos )(1 − Cos )
2
1 0.2  = 90o, S() = 0.50
4 0.0  (o )
SL 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
Liquid
Solid
 Heterogeneous nucleation,
Mold r SM ML especially those on mold wall
that is similar to solid (i.e. low
𝛾𝑀𝐿 = 𝛾𝑆𝑀 + 𝛾𝑆𝐿 𝐶𝑜𝑠𝜃 γSM), has much lower nucleation
𝛾𝑀𝐿 − 𝛾𝑆𝑀 = 𝛾𝑆𝐿 𝐶𝑜𝑠𝜃 barrier than homogeneous
SM  Cos    or better “wetting” nucleation
EMA 5001 Zhe Cheng 13 Heterogeneous Nucleation 4
Heterogeneous Nucleation Rate

❑Define
C1 Number of atoms contacting heterogeneous
nucleation sites per unit liquid volume
Ghet
*
Heterogeneous nucleation energy
f1 Frequency of adding one atom to a
heterogeneous nucleus with critical size
Heterogeneous nucleation rate (m-3s-1)
 Ghet *

N het = f1C1 exp − 
 kT 
Since
Ghet*
= Ghom
*
 S ( )
16 SL
3
Tm2 1
G *
= 
T 2
hom 2
3Lv Phase Transformations in Metals & Alloys, Porter,
3rd Ed, 2008, p. 199
We have
 A  S ( )  Heterogeneous nucleation occurs at
N het = f1C1 exp − 
  T 2
 much smaller undercooling than
homogenous nucleation
EMA 5001 Zhe Cheng 13 Heterogeneous Nucleation 5
Other Factors Influencing
Heterogeneous Nucleation Rate
❑Surface tension & contact angle
S ( ) =
(2 + Cos )(1 − Cos )
2
1
Smaller solid-mold (or impurity) 4
 ML −  SM
interfacial energy SM → Smaller  Cos = 𝛾𝑀𝐿 = 𝛾𝑆𝑀 + 𝛾𝑆𝐿 𝐶𝑜𝑠𝜃
Smaller S() → Faster nucleation  SL
❑Mold surface microstructure
Concave
▪ In general, no matter what shape
nucleation energy 
1  Flat
G* = V *Gv 
2
▪ Concave mold (or impurity) surface
and certain micro-cracks facilitate Convex
nucleation by decreasing V* and Over mold or
In micro-cracks
nucleation energy impurity surface

❑Impurity density
▪ Adding seeds or inoculants increases nucleation rate
− Also decreases grain size
EMA 5001 Zhe Cheng 13 Heterogeneous Nucleation 6
Growth of Pure Element Solid from Liquid

❑Growth of pure element solid from liquid for different types of solid-
liquid interfaces
Liquid Liquid
Diffuse Flat

Solid Solid
Lf Lf
R S  R ~ 4 R S  ~ 4 R
Tm Tm
• Microscopically diffuse • Microscopically flat
• Macroscopically flat or branch-like • With stepped or zig-zagged Features
• Most metals: • Si, Ge, and nonmetals
Ni: Tm =1455 oC Si: Tm =1414 oC
Lf =298 kJ/kg=17.4 kJ/mol, CN=12 Lf =1790 kJ/kg=50.26 kJ/mol, CN=4
→ Lower bonding energy → Much higher bonding energy
Continuous growth Lateral growth
• Microscopically, growth of solid (into • Microscopically, growth of solid occurs
liquid) occurs by adding individual along the solid-liquid interface at
atoms, randomly to the interface specific locations/sites
EMA 5001 Zhe Cheng 13 Heterogeneous Nucleation 7
Continuous Growth

❑Low bonding energy (i.e., easier to create broken bonds)


▪ High vacancy concentration at the solid-liquid Liquid
interface
▪ Activation energy ΔGa  diffusion activation
energy in liquid (very small)
Solid
▪ Fast interface “reaction” or L → S conversion
▪ Driving force for solidification (solid growth) G
L
Gv =  Ti
Tm ΔGa
L Latent heat of melting/fusion ΔGv
Ti Undercooling at the solid-liquid interface
▪ Velocity of the solid-liquid interface (growth Liquid Solid x
rate of solid)
v  Gv  Ti
▪ Mobility of diffuse solid-liquid interface is extremely high
▪ For normal rate of metal solidification, Ti < 1 oC →
Solid-liquid “diffuse” interface is at close to equilibrium Tm in solidification
EMA 5001 Zhe Cheng 13 Heterogeneous Nucleation 8
Lateral Growth

❑If high bonding energy (e.g. for Si) Liquid


▪ A single atom attached to a flat surface creates
multiple broken bonds and tend to dissolve back, Solid
leading to limited perpendicular growth
Liquid
▪ Atoms prefer to attach to solid at existing ledge or
jog positions, leading to lateral growth Solid
❑Possible growth geometries
Surface Nucleation Spiral Growth Continuous growth
(diffuse interface)

Growth rate v
Spiral
growth
Surface
nucleation

http://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Crystallization
Ti
▪ Lateral growth slower than continuous growth due to fewer geometric locations
EMA 5001 Zhe Cheng 13 Heterogeneous Nucleation 9
Examples of Lateral Growth:
Surface Nucleation & Spiral Growth
Glucose isomerase
SiC crystal Graphite crystal
crystal

S. AMELINCKX
Mike Sleutel Dr. Victor N. Kvasnitsa
https://www.nature.com/physics/looking-
https://www.pnas.org/content/11 https://pages.mtu.edu/~jaszczak/compspirals.html
back/verma/index.html
1/5/E546

EMA 5001 Zhe Cheng 13 Heterogeneous Nucleation 10


Temperate Profile & Growth of
a Pure Element Solid (1) - Planar Growth
❑Solidification rate of pure element solid determined by heat conduction
❑Solid grows into superheated liquid (TS < TL)
▪ Example
Solid Liquid
− Solidification of liquid in a mold and
mold wall is colder than liquid Ti v
▪ Balance of heat flow Solid Liquid
Heat
S Thermal conductivity of solid Ti=Tm
L Thermal conductivity of liquid
If local protrusion
TS ’ Temperature gradient in solid
Solid Liquid
TL’ Temperature gradient in liquid
v
Lv Latent heat of melting
Assuming NO
v Solid growth rate temperature change Heat
deep in S, L, and at
 S TS ' =  LTL '+ vLv the S/L interface

▪ Shape of the solid-liquid interface TS’ ↓ TL’  v ↓


− Planar (macroscopically) solid-liquid interface
is stable (i.e., local protrusions are NOT stable)
EMA 5001 Zhe Cheng 13 Heterogeneous Nucleation 11
Temperate Profile & Growth of
a Pure Element Solid (2) - Dendritic Growth
❑Solid grows into supercooled liquid (TS > TL) Solid Liquid
v
▪ Example Ti
Solid Liquid
− Beginning stage of solidification of Heat
supercooled liquid Ti=Tm
▪ Balance of heat flow If local protrusion
 S TS '+ vLv =  LTL ' Solid Liquid
▪ Shape of the solid-liquid interface v
− Planar solid-liquid interface is unstable Assuming NO
temperature change
Heat
(protrusions tend to grow even faster!)
− Form dendrite (branch-like) structures deep in S, L, and at
the S/L interface
TS’ ↓ TL’  v 
▪ Tip growth rate increases as tip radius
decreases
▪ Growth rate approaches zero as
− r increases towards  (i.e., flat)
− r decreases towards r*

EMA 5001 Zhe Cheng 13 Heterogeneous Nucleation 12


Dendrites in (Metal) Solidification

Ni dendrites (simulated)

Zn
dendrites

H. K. D. H. Bhadeshia
http://www.phase-trans.msm.cam.ac.uk/dendrites.html

Cu
dendrites
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_art
text&pid=S1516-14392006000400002

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dendrite_(metal)

EMA 5001 Zhe Cheng 13 Heterogeneous Nucleation 13

You might also like