Prior Decisions
Prior Decisions
SHA’s design for the path along the east side of US 29 is adequate and the shared use path along Briggs Chaney
Road is a suitable connection to the Prince George’s County bikeways and trails network. The only question is
ensuring a safe connection with a future path along Fairland Road. This should be studied in detail when SHA
designs the Fairland Road/US 29 interchange project.
PRIOR DECISIONS
The Planning Board supported the SHA Bike Plan during its review of the highway’s FEIS but stopped short of
recommending its removal from County master plans. The County Council did not support the SHA Bike Plan and
recommended the CBP along the highway, within the right-of-way, and through the US 29 interchange to the Prince
George’s County line.
RECOMMENDATIONS
• Remove the CBP through the interchange from County master plans.
• Retain the segment of the CBP between Briggs Chaney Road and US 29 in County master plans.
• Examine the connection between the future shared use path along the south side of Fairland Road with the
path along the east side of US 29 as part of the proposed Fairland/US 29 interchange study.
This master plan amendment can be summarized by describing what happens to the CBP (SP-40) as a result of the
various recommendations. All prior master plans, including the CBFMP, envisioned a pathway or trail within the
highway right-of-way from Shady Grove Road to the Prince George’s County Line. This amendment recommends
retaining the previously master planned alignment in two areas and routing it along major roads in others, generally
consistent with the SHA’s Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. The table below describes how SP-40 would function end to
end under this amendment, from west to east (see figure 8).
35
Summary of Recommendations Affecting SP-40
Plan amendment needed to add shared use path to Muncaster Mill Road, and bike route along Applewood Lane.
Emory Lane to Georgia Avenue Retain existing master plan alignment along ICC ROW
Plan amendment needed to add shared use path to Bonifant Road and Notley Road, as well as along Alderton
Road to provide side-connection to MHT (SP-40B) as well as SP-40 through Northwest Branch Park north of Boni-
fant Road.
Park Trail
- New sanctioned east-west park trail between park boundaries, connecting Cape May Road to Countryside Lane
US 29 to Briggs Chaney Road Retain current master plan recommendation for CBP within or along the ICC ROW; if along ICC ROW, possible
through Tabnglewood community and Tanglewood Park.
36
Park Trails—Before and After
This plan amendment affects a number of park trail alignments, and thus also the CPTP, which has specific connections
with the trail along the highway.
M A T T H E W H E N S O N T R A I L (see figure 5). The County Bike Path was intended to intersect with the MHT within
Northwest Branch Stream Valley Park south of Bonifant Road, where the MHT-reserved land intersects with the ICC
right-of-way. When the State decided not to include the trail through the park along the highway, the location of the
trail-intersection changed significantly. With the CBP no longer passing through the park south of Bonifant Road (blue
line), the connection between MHT and Alderton Road now must be implemented as a park trail, not a transportation
bikeway. Therefore the connection between Alderton Road (C on figure 5) and Notley Road (B on figure 5) becomes a
park trail connector, an extension of the Matthew Henson Trail, to be evaluated by the Department of Parks as a future
facility planning study (looking at options for both natural surface and hard surface trail users). This connection will be
the subject of a future facility planning study led by the Department of Parks, with SHA funding assistance requested.
P A I N T B R A N C H S T R E A M V A L L E Y P A R K (see figure 7). The CBP is proposed to be removed from the park due to en-
vironmental impacts. Hard surface trail users will be expected to follow the SHA Bike/Pedestrian Plan (Fairland Road, East
Randolph Road, and New Hampshire Avenue). The Department of Parks will initiate a Trail Corridor Study to determine
the type (hard surface or natural), location, and design of a future trail through the park connecting Cape May Road with
Countryside Park, consistent with the recommendations in the CPTP.
37
Figure 8 SP-40 Before and After
38