List of collected data

1. COBURN, A., & GORMALLY, S. (2017). SOCIAL JUSTICE AND

EQUALITY. Counterpoints, 483, 51–76. http://www.jstor.org/stable/45177771
2. Sen, A. (2006). What Do We Want from a Theory of Justice? The Journal of
Philosophy, 103(5), 215–238.
3. Sen, A. (1990). Justice: Means versus Freedoms. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 19(2),
111–121.
4. Shaviro, D. (1989). Statistical-Probability Evidence and the Appearance of
Justice. Harvard Law Review, 103(2), 530–554.
5. Claeys, G. (1983). The Concept of “Political Justice” in Godwin’s Political Justice: A
Reconsideration. Political Theory, 11(4), 565–584.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/191450
6. Everson, G. (1919). The Human Element in Justice. Journal of the American Institute
of Criminal Law and Criminology, 10(1), 90–99.
7. MARINARI, A. (2021). Restorative justice and survivors’ justice needs. In Restorative
Justice for Survivors of Sexual Abuse (1st ed., pp. 13–46). Bristol University Press.
8. Hurtado, J. (2018). Citizens, Markets and Social Order: An Aristotelian Reading of
Smith and Rousseau on Justice. In M. P. Paganelli, D. C. Rasmussen, & C. Smith
(Eds.), Adam Smith and Rousseau: Ethics, Politics, Economics (pp. 214–238).
Edinburgh University Press.
9. Chenneville, T. (2017). Ethics and Social Justice: A Review of Theoretical Frameworks
and Pedagogical Considerations. In D. D. Liston & R. Rahimi (Eds.), Promoting Social
Justice through the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (pp. 3–14). Indiana
University Press.
10. Fraser, N. (2009). Abnormal Justice. In Scales of Justice: Reimagining Political Space
in a Globalizing World (pp. 48–75). Columbia University Press.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7312/fras14680.7
11. Nagin, D. S., & Paternoster, R. (1993). Enduring Individual Differences and Rational
Choice Theories of Crime. Law & Society Review, 27(3), 467–496.
12. Marcin, R. B. (2006). Modern Conceptions of Justice. In In Search of Schopenhauer’s
Cat: Arthur Schopenhauer’s Quantum-Mystical Theory of Justice (pp. 147–173).
Catholic University of America Press.
13. Cohen, A. I. (2016). Corrective vs. Distributive Justice: the Case of Apologies. Ethical
Theory and Moral Practice, 19(3), 663–677.
14. VALENTINI, L. (2013). Justice, Disagreement and Democracy. British Journal of
Political Science, 43(1), 177–199.
15. Nozick, R. (1973). Distributive Justice. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 3(1), 45–126.
16. Rawls, J. (1958). Justice as Fairness. The Philosophical Review, 67(2), 164–194.
17. Shandro, A. M. (1989). A Marxist Theory of Justice? Canadian Journal of Political
Science / Revue Canadienne de Science Politique, 22(1), 27–47.
18. Scanlon, T. M. (1973). Rawls’ Theory of Justice. University of Pennsylvania Law
Review, 121(5), 1020–1069.
19. Boot, M. (2012). The Aim of a Theory of Justice. Ethical Theory and Moral
Practice, 15(1), 7–21
20. GAYNOR, T. S., & SCHACHTER, H. L. (2014). REVISITING THE “THEORY OF
JUSTICE.” Public Administration Quarterly, 38(4), 440–444.
21. Bentley, D. J. (1973). John Rawls: A Theory of Justice. University of Pennsylvania Law
Review, 121(5), 1070–1078.
22. Choptiany, L. (1973). A Critique of John Rawls’s Principles of Justice. Ethics, 83(2),
146–150.
23. Schaar, J. H. (1974). REFLECTIONS ON RAWLS’ THEORY OF JUSTICE. Social Theory
and Practice, 3(1), 75–100.
24. Zuckert, M. (1981). Justice Deserted: A Critique of Rawls’ “A Theory of
Justice.” Polity, 13(3), 466–483.
25. Gans, E. (2006). John Rawls’s Originary Theory of Justice. Contagion: Journal of
Violence, Mimesis, and Culture, 12/13, 149–157.
26. SARANGI, P. (1991). NOTION OF “STATE” IN JOHN RAWLS’ THEORY OF JUSTICE. The
Indian Journal of Political Science, 52(2), 195–207.
27. Pulin B. Nayak. (1989). Nozick’s Entitlement Theory and Distributive
Justice. Economic and Political Weekly, 24(4), PE2–PE8.
28. [Rawls: “A Theory of Justice” and Its Critics]. (1992). The American Political Science
Review, 86(2), 488–488.
29. Edgren, J. A. (1995). On the Relevance of John Rawls’s Theory of Justice to Welfare
Economics. Edgren, J. A. (1995). On the Relevance of John Rawls’s Theory of Justice
to Welfare Economics. Review of Social Economy, 53(3), 332–349.
30. Sen, A. (1990). Justice: Means versus Freedoms. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 19(2),
111–121.
31. Craig, L. H. (1975). Contra Contract: A Brief against John Rawls’ “Theory of
Justice.” Canadian Journal of Political Science / Revue Canadienne de Science
Politique, 8(1), 63–81.
32. Gotoh, R. (2014). THE EQUALITY OF THE DIFFERENCES: SEN’S CRITIQUE OF
RAWLS’S THEORY OF JUSTICE AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR WELFARE
ECONOMICS. History of Economic Ideas, 22(1), 133–155.
33. Fullinwider, R. K. (1977). Bibliography: A Chronological Bibliography of Works on John
Rawls’ Theory of Justice. Political Theory, 5(4), 561–570.
34. Harsanyi, J. C. (1975). Can the Maximin Principle Serve as a Basis for Morality? A
Critique of John Rawls’s Theory [Review of A Theory of Justice, by J. Rawls]. The
American Political Science Review, 69(2), 594–606.
35. GALIŠANKA, A. (2019). A Theory of Justice. In John Rawls: The Path to a Theory of
Justice (pp. 173–188). Harvard University Press.
36. By Rawls, J. (1985). Justice as Fairness: Political not Metaphysical. Philosophy &
Public Affairs, 14(3), 223–251.