Controlling 2
Controlling 2
Concept of Control
The concept of controlling in management is the process of monitoring,
evaluating, and regulating the activities and performance of an organization
to ensure that they align with its goals and objectives. Control in management
is a fundamental function that helps in tracking progress, identifying
deviations from plans, and taking corrective actions to maintain the desired
course of action. It involves setting standards, measuring performance,
comparing results to standards, analysing variances, and implementing
necessary changes to achieve organizational goals. Control is an ongoing
process that contributes to the effectiveness and success of an organization.
Definition of Control
"Control" refers to the systematic process of monitoring, evaluating, and
regulating organizational activities, resources, and processes to ensure they
are in accordance with established plans, standards, and objectives. It
encompasses monitoring, analysis, and corrective actions to maintain
desired outcomes and efficiency.
Importance of Control
1. Achieving Organizational Goals: Controlling helps ensure that the
organization is moving in the right direction and that its activities and
resources are aligned with the established goals and objectives. It
provides a means to measure progress toward these goals.
CONCEPT OF COORDINATION
IMPORTANCE OF COORDINATION
PRINCIPLES OF COORDINATION
Early Start: Coordinating efforts within an organization should kick off right
from the beginning, especially during the initial stages of planning and policy-
making. Imagine it like setting the coordination wheels in motion as soon as
the planning process begins. This early coordination not only enhances the
overall quality of the plans but also creates a workplace where employees
and different parts of the organization rely on each other. This
interconnectedness is crucial for smooth and effective teamwork.
This mutual understanding and cooperation also boost the efficiency of fellow
employees. Through this mutual cooperation, employees tend to discipline
themselves and work more effectively.
DIRECTING
CONCEPT
The concept of directing is a crucial element in the field of management and
refers to the process of guiding, instructing, and influencing individuals or
groups within an organization to achieve organizational goals. Directing
involves leadership, communication, motivation, and supervision to ensure
that organizational objectives are effectively and efficiently accomplished.
DEFINITION
Directing in management refers to the process of guiding, instructing, and
overseeing individuals and groups within an organization to achieve
predetermined objectives. It involves the managerial tasks of leadership,
communication, motivation, supervision, and coordination to ensure that
organizational goals are effectively met. Directing is a dynamic and
interactive function that aims to harness the efforts of individuals toward the
common purpose of the organization.
FEATURES OF DIRECTING
ELEMENTS OF DIRECTING
IMPORTANCE OF LEADERSHIP
I. Guidance and Direction: Leadership provides a sense of direction and
guidance. Leaders articulate a vision, set goals, and help individuals or
organizations navigate the path toward success.
II. Inspiration and Motivation: Leaders inspire and motivate others.
Through their words, actions, and example, they encourage individuals
or teams to reach their full potential and achieve common objectives.
III. Decision-Making: Leadership involves making informed and timely
decisions. Leaders consider various factors, weigh alternatives, and
choose the best course of action, which is essential for progress and
growth.
IV. Conflict Resolution: Effective leaders are skilled at resolving conflicts
and managing interpersonal issues. They create a harmonious work
environment that fosters collaboration and productivity.
V. Organizational Culture: Leaders shape the culture of an organization.
Their values, behaviours, and expectations influence the way
individuals work together, fostering a positive and productive
atmosphere.
VI. Innovation and Change: Leaders drive innovation and facilitate change.
They encourage creativity, adaptability, and a willingness to embrace
new ideas, technologies, and methodologies.
VII. Team Building: Leadership is crucial for building cohesive and high-
performing teams. Leaders recognize individual strengths, foster
collaboration, and create a sense of belonging and purpose within the
team.
VIII. Employee Engagement: Engaged employees are more productive and
committed. Leadership plays a key role in creating an environment
where employees feel valued, recognized, and motivated to contribute
their best.
IX. Strategic Planning: Leaders engage in strategic thinking and planning.
They consider long-term goals, analyse trends, and position their
organizations to adapt to a changing environment.
X. Crisis Management: During challenging times, effective leadership is
essential for crisis management. Leaders provide stability,
reassurance, and strategic direction to navigate through adversity.
XI. Talent Development: Leadership involves developing the talents and
skills of individuals. Leaders mentor, coach, and provide opportunities
for learning and growth, contributing to the overall development of the
workforce.
XII. Customer Satisfaction: Leaders understand the importance of meeting
customer needs and expectations. They instill a customer-centric
mindset within the organization, enhancing overall satisfaction and
loyalty.
XIII. Social Responsibility: Leaders guide organizations in fulfilling their
social responsibilities. They consider the impact of their decisions on
the community, environment, and society at large.
XIV. Adaptability and Resilience: In a dynamic and changing world,
leadership is essential for adapting to new challenges and bouncing
back from setbacks. Resilient leaders foster an environment of learning
and continuous improvement.
TYPES OF LEADERSHIP
Leadership can take various forms, and different situations may call for
different styles of leadership. Here are some common types of leadership:
1) Autocratic Leadership: In this style, the leader makes decisions without
input from others. It can be effective in situations requiring quick and
decisive actions, but it may stifle creativity and motivation.
2) Democratic Leadership: Also known as participative leadership, this
style involves gathering input from team members before making
decisions. It promotes collaboration and can lead to higher levels of
employee satisfaction and engagement.
3) Transformational Leadership: Transformational leaders inspire and
motivate their teams by creating a compelling vision and encouraging
innovation. They often focus on individual development and empower
others to reach their full potential.
4) Transactional Leadership: Transactional leaders focus on the
exchange of rewards and punishments based on performance. This
style is rooted in the concept of transactions or exchanges between
leaders and followers.
5) Laissez-Faire Leadership: This leadership style involves a hands-off
approach, where leaders provide minimal guidance. It can be effective
when working with a highly skilled and self-motivated team but may
lead to lack of direction in other situations.
6) Servant Leadership: Servant leaders prioritize the needs of their team
members, focusing on their well-being and development. The leader
serves the team, fostering a culture of collaboration and empathy.
7) Situational Leadership: This approach emphasizes adapting leadership
style to the specific needs of a situation. Leaders assess factors such
as the task at hand, the skills of the team, and the context to determine
the most effective approach.
8) Bureaucratic Leadership: Bureaucratic leaders adhere strictly to
established procedures and policies. This style is effective in stable
environments where consistency and predictability are essential.
9) Transactional Leadership: Transactional leaders focus on the
exchange of rewards and punishments based on performance. This
style is rooted in the concept of transactions or exchanges between
leaders and followers.
QUALITIES & TRAITS OF A GOOD LEADER
A. Vision: A good leader has a clear vision of the future and can
articulate it in a way that inspires others. This vision provides
direction and purpose for the team or organization.
B. Integrity: Leaders operate with honesty, transparency, and
ethical behaviour. Integrity builds trust and credibility, essential
for effective leadership.
C. Empathy: Empathetic leaders understand and consider the
feelings, perspectives, and needs of others. This fosters positive
relationships and a supportive work environment.
D. Communication Skills: Effective communication is a fundamental
leadership skill. Leaders must convey their ideas clearly, actively
listen, and adapt their communication style to the audience.
E. Confidence: Confidence instills trust and inspires others. A
leader who exudes confidence can motivate and reassure team
members, even in challenging situations.
F. Adaptability: Leaders navigate through change and uncertainty
with adaptability. Flexibility allows leaders to adjust strategies
and approaches as needed.
G. Decisiveness: Leaders make timely and informed decisions.
Decisiveness is crucial, especially in situations that require quick
and effective responses.
H. Courage: Courageous leaders take calculated risks, confront
difficult situations, and advocate for what they believe is right.
Courage inspires others to take bold actions.
I. Accountability: Leaders take responsibility for their actions and
the outcomes of their decisions. Accountability builds a culture
of responsibility within the team or organization.
J. Inspiration: Good leaders inspire and motivate others. They
create a positive and encouraging work environment that fosters
enthusiasm and commitment.
K. Resilience: Leaders face challenges and setbacks with
resilience. The ability to bounce back from adversity and
maintain a positive attitude is a valuable trait.
L. Strategic Thinking: Leaders engage in strategic thinking,
considering long-term goals and the broader implications of their
decisions. Strategic leaders plan for the future.
M. Humility: Humble leaders are open to feedback, admit mistakes,
and recognize the contributions of others. Humility fosters a
collaborative and inclusive culture.
N. Innovation: Leaders encourage creativity and innovation. They
value new ideas and provide an environment where team
members feel empowered to contribute.
O. Motivation: Motivational leaders recognize and reward
achievements. They understand what drives individuals and use
this knowledge to inspire peak performance.
P. Empowerment: Leaders empower others by delegating
responsibilities, providing autonomy, and fostering a sense of
ownership among team members.
Q. Tolerance for Ambiguity: Leaders can navigate uncertainty and
ambiguity with composure. They don't shy away from situations
where the outcome is uncertain.
R. Continuous Learning: Successful leaders are committed to
continuous learning and self-improvement. They stay informed
about industry trends and emerging best practices.
RENSIS LIKERT’S FOUR THOERY OF LEADERSHIP
Rensis Likert was a social psychologist and management scholar known for
his work in the field of organizational behaviour. One of his significant
contributions was the development of the Likert Scale, a tool used to
measure attitudes and opinions. In addition to this, Likert proposed a model
of organizational management known as the "Likert Management System" or
"System 4."
The Likert Management System is based on the idea that there are different
ways in which organizations can be structured and managed, and these ways
can have varying impacts on employee motivation, job satisfaction, and
overall organizational effectiveness. Likert outlined four systems of
management, each representing a different approach to leadership and
decision-making:
System 1 - Exploitative-Authoritative: In this system, decision-making is highly
centralized, and there is limited communication between top management
and lower-level employees. Power is concentrated at the top, and employees
have little input into decision-making processes.
System 2 - Benevolent-Authoritative: While decision-making authority still
remains at the top, there is some communication from higher-ups to lower-
level employees. The leadership style is somewhat more benevolent, but
significant decision-making power is retained by the higher levels of
management.
System 3 - Consultative: This system involves increased communication in
both directions. Decision-making becomes more participative, with leaders
seeking input from employees before making decisions. However, the
ultimate authority still resides with top management.
System 4 - Participative-Group: This is the most participative and
decentralized system. Decision-making is not concentrated at the top but is
distributed throughout the organization. Group participation is emphasized,
and communication flows freely between all levels of the organization.
Likert believed that organizations operating under System 4, with a more
participative and group-oriented approach, were likely to be more effective
and that employees in such organizations would be more satisfied and
motivated.
BLAKE AND MOUTON’S MANAGERIAL GRID LEADERSHIP
The Blake and Mouton Managerial Grid, also known as the Leadership Grid, is
a leadership model developed by Robert R. Blake and Jane S. Mouton in the
1960s. This model utilizes a grid with two axes to map leadership styles based
on two key dimensions: concern for people and concern for production
(task).
The horizontal axis of the grid represents concern for people, ranging from 1
to 9, while the vertical axis represents concern for production, also ranging
from 1 to 9. Each point on the grid corresponds to a specific leadership style,
resulting in five main styles.
The model is based on two behavioural dimensions:
Concern for People: this is the degree to which a leader considers team
members' needs, interests and areas of personal development when deciding
how best to accomplish a task.
Concern for Production: this is the degree to which a leader emphasizes
concrete objectives, organizational efficiency and high productivity when
deciding how best to accomplish a task.
Country Club Management (1,9): This style is characterized by a high concern
for people but a low concern for production. Leaders focus on creating a
friendly and comfortable work environment.
Team Management (9,9): This style involves a high concern for both people
and production. Leaders strive to create a team-oriented approach,
emphasizing both relationships and task accomplishment.
Impoverished Management (1,1): With low concern for both people and
production, this style reflects minimal effort in leadership, often appearing
indifferent and apathetic.
Authority-Obedience Management (9,1): This style is marked by a high
concern for production but a low concern for people. Leaders prioritize
efficiency and task accomplishment with less emphasis on employee
satisfaction.
Middle-of-the-Road Management (5,5): This style seeks a balance with
moderate concern for both people and production. Leaders aim for a
compromise between getting work done and maintaining positive
relationships.
The Leadership Grid suggests that the ideal leadership style is Team
Management (9,9), where both concern for people and concern for
production are high. This style is believed to lead to high levels of employee
satisfaction and effective task accomplishment. While the model provides
valuable insights into different leadership approaches, it's essential to
recognize that effective leadership often requires flexibility and adaptation to
specific circumstances.
FRED FIEDLER’S CONTINGENCY MODEL
In Fred Fiedler's Contingency Model of Leadership, situational factors refer to
three key elements in the work environment that influence the effectiveness
of a leader's style. These factors help determine whether a leader's style is
well-matched to the situation, thereby affecting the leader's overall
effectiveness. The three situational factors are:
Leader-Member Relations:
1. Definition: This factor refers to the quality of relationships between the
leader and the group members. It assesses the level of trust, respect,
and confidence that exists within the team.
2. Impact: When leader-member relations are positive (high trust and
good communication), the situation is considered more favourable. In
contrast, if there is a lack of trust or poor communication, the situation
is less favourable.
3. Leadership Style: In situations with positive leader-member relations, a
leader can afford to be more relationship-oriented. In situations with
strained relations, a more task-oriented approach may be necessary.
Task Structure:
1. Definition: Task structure refers to the clarity and structure of the tasks
to be performed. Highly structured tasks have clear goals and well-
defined procedures, while unstructured tasks lack clear guidelines.
2. Impact: Highly structured tasks are considered more favorable
because they provide clear direction. Unstructured tasks are less
favourable as they require more guidance and direction from the
leader.
3. Leadership Style: In situations with high task structure, task-oriented
leadership is generally more effective. In situations with low task
structure, a more relationship-oriented approach may be needed.
Position Power:
1. Definition: Position power refers to the formal authority and influence a
leader has in a given situation. It includes the leader's ability to reward
or punish team members.
2. Impact: When a leader has strong position power, the situation is more
favourable. Weak position power makes the situation less favourable
as the leader has limited ability to influence or control team members.
3. Leadership Style: In situations where the leader has strong position
power, a task-oriented approach is often more effective. In situations
with weak position power, a relationship-oriented style may be more
appropriate.
Overall Concept:
The Contingency Model suggests that the effectiveness of a leader is
contingent on how well the leader's style aligns with these situational factors.
It emphasizes the importance of assessing the situation and adapting
leadership behaviour accordingly. A good match between leadership style
and situational factors is believed to lead to higher leadership effectiveness.
Tannenbaum and Schmidt Leadership Continuum
The Tannenbaum and Schmidt Leadership Continuum is a theoretical model
that delineates a spectrum of leadership styles developed by Robert
Tannenbaum and Warren H. Schmidt. The model identifies two primary
leadership approaches: autocratic and democratic.
In the autocratic leadership style, decisions are made by the leader without
consulting the team. The leader holds centralized authority, and
communication is predominantly one-way—from the leader to the team. Team
involvement in decision-making is limited.
Conversely, the democratic leadership style involves the leader actively
engaging the team in decision-making processes. Authority is shared
between the leader and the team, fostering a two-way communication
channel with input from both sides. Team members play an active role in
decision-making.
PROCESS OF MOTIVATION
1) Unsatisfied need: Motivation usually begins with a need or desire. This can
be a physical need like hunger or a psychological desire such as recognition
or personal growth. Needs can be both basic (like food and safety) and
higher-level (like self-fulfilment).
3) Motive: frustration motivates the individual to find ways to satisfy his need.
"motive" refers to the specific reason or desire that drives an individual to
take action or pursue a particular goal.
6) Reduced Tension: once the individual's need is met then his frustration and
tension are relieved.
IMPORTANCE OF MOTIVATION
Theory Y:
1) View of People: Theory Y assumes that people can find fulfilments in their
work, are self-motivated, and capable of being creative and responsible.
2) Management Style: Managers who embrace Theory Y promote a more
participative and supportive style, encouraging employees to use their
skills and talents.
3) Communication: Open communication and employee involvement in
decision-making are valued in Theory Y organizations.
4) Motivation: In Theory Y, motivation is seen as stemming from intrinsic
factors like personal growth and a sense of purpose
5) Outcome: Theory Y fosters an engaged and innovative workforce.
Employees are likely to be motivated and take ownership of their work.