0% found this document useful (0 votes)
2 views3 pages

Intro Math Reasoning

mathematical calculations

Uploaded by

simonnjorogesmv
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
2 views3 pages

Intro Math Reasoning

mathematical calculations

Uploaded by

simonnjorogesmv
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Question 1

(a) ‘There is no solution to the equation y2 = x2(x + 1) with x ∈ Z − {0} and y ∈ Z − {0} when y is odd.’

Solution

The given statement can be written symbolically as:

∀x ∈ Z - {0}, ∀y ∈ Z - {0}, y is odd → y² ≠ x²(x + 1)

To negate this statement, we can use De Morgan's laws and logical equivalences:

¬(∀x ∈ Z - {0}, ∀y ∈ Z - {0}, y is odd → y² ≠ x²(x + 1))

≡ ∃x ∈ Z - {0}, ∃y ∈ Z - {0}, y is odd ∧ y² = x²(x + 1)

The negated statement is: "There exists integers x and y (excluding 0) such that y is odd and y² = x²(x +
1)."

To determine if the original statement is true or false, we can look for a proof or counterexample.

Counterexample:

Let x = 2 and y = 3. Then y is odd, and y² = 9 = 2²(2 + 1) = x²(x + 1), so there is a solution to the equation.
Therefore, the original statement is false.

Proof:

Suppose y² = x²(x + 1) for some x ∈ Z - {0} and y ∈ Z - {0} where y is odd. Then we can write y² = x(x² + x)
= x(x + 1)(x - 1) + x, which implies that x divides y².

Since x and y are relatively prime (because they have no common factors other than 1), it follows that x
divides y. Let y = kx for some integer k. Then the equation y² = x²(x + 1) becomes k²x² = x²(x + 1), which
simplifies to k² = x + 1/x.

The left-hand side of this equation is a non-negative integer, so the right-hand side must also be a non-
negative integer. Therefore, x must be either 1 or -1. But x cannot be -1, since it is excluded from the set
of values for x. So x = 1, and we have k² = 2. But there is no integer k such that k² = 2, so we have a
contradiction.

Therefore, there is no solution to the equation y² = x²(x + 1) with x ∈ Z - {0} and y ∈ Z - {0} when y is odd.

b) Let p be prime and let n be a natural number. If p divides n! then p


divides n + p’.
Symbolic language with quantifiers:

∀p∈Primes,∀n∈N,(p|n! → p|(n+p))

Negation of the statement:

∃p∈Primes,∃n∈N,(p|n! ∧ ¬p|(n+p))

Translation of negation:

There exists a prime number p and a natural number n such that p divides n! and p does not divide n +
p.

To determine the truth value of the statement, we will prove it and then use that proof to show that its
negation is false.

Proof:

Let p be a prime and n be a natural number such that p divides n!. This means that p divides the product
of all positive integers up to and including n.

We want to show that p divides n + p. We can rewrite n + p as n + (n - 1) + ... + 2p + p. We know that p


divides n!, so it also divides (n - 1)!, (n - 2)!, and so on down to p!. Therefore, p divides the sum of these
factorials, which is n + (n - 1) + ... + 2p + p.

Therefore, we have shown that if p divides n!, then p divides n + p.

Since we have proved the statement, its negation is false. Therefore, the original statement is true.

Question 2

write its contrapositive form: ‘For any natural number p > 2, if p is even and 2p + 5 is odd then p is not
even or a square’

Here ‘a square’ means ‘the square of a natural number’.

Answer

Symbolic language with quantifiers:

∀p > 2, (p is even ∧ 2p + 5 is odd) → (p is not even ∨ ∃n ∈ N, p = n^2)


Implication form:

(p is even ∧ 2p + 5 is odd) → (p is not even ∨ ∃n ∈ N, p = n^2)

Contrapositive form:

(¬(p is not even ∨ ∃n ∈ N, p = n^2)) → ¬(p is even ∧ 2p + 5 is odd)

Using De Morgan's laws, we can simplify the negation of the consequent:

(¬(p is not even) ∧ ∀n ∈ N, p ≠ n^2) → (p is odd ∨ ¬(p is even))

Using double negation, we can simplify the antecedent:

(p is even ∧ ∀n ∈ N, p ≠ n^2) → (p is odd ∨ ¬(p is even))

Thus, the contrapositive of the statement is:

For any natural number p > 2, if p is even and p is a square, then 2p + 5 is even or p is not even.

Note that the original statement and its contrapositive are both true.

You might also like