Scribd
Upload
9 views3 pages

LX2612 Case Note

Vhjvf drgvhiij ffhghuibg gujbh

Uploaded by

Ijlal Haider
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
9 views3 pages

LX2612 Case Note

Vhjvf drgvhiij ffhghuibg gujbh

Uploaded by

Ijlal Haider
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Brunel University

BRUNEL LAW SCHOOL

Bachelor of Laws (Honours Degree) / GELLB

Main Coursework
2024-25
LX2612

Submission deadline: 12:00 noon, 14th January 2025

Word limit: 2,000

Please answer the question set forth below.

Any coursework or examined submission for assessment where plagiarism,


collusion or any form of cheating is suspected will be dealt with according to
the University processes which are detailed in Senate Regulation 6.

You can access information about plagiarism here.

The University regulations on plagiarism apply to published as well as


unpublished work, collusion and the plagiarism of the work of other students.

Please ensure that you fully understand what constitutes plagiarism before
you submit your work.

University assessments must be your own work. To maintain your academic


integrity you must declare any assistance from Artificial Intelligence (AI).

When submitting this piece of work, WISEflow will ask you to confirm use of
any AI software.

Further details, including a guidance video, can be found at this link.

______________________________________________________________

John is an English solicitor who just joined the in-house legal department of a
major corporation whose headquarters are in Brussels / Belgium. He was
assigned to the department’s legal knowledge depository and asked to write a

Page 1 of 3
memorandum about Case C-133/12-P Stichting Woonlinie v Commission. The
memorandum should include a summary of the facts, the outcome and the
reasoning about the applicants being individually concerned. The
memorandum should also include a comment on the implications the
judgment has for the development of EU law.

1. Prepare John’s memorandum (2,500 words).


2. Further, explain in up to 100 additional words how the seminars helped
improve your understanding of the legal principles underlying the case.

Grade Descriptors (UG)

This guide is to be used during the writing of your assessment to evaluate how well you are
meeting the grade descriptors. This should help you to understand how you are progressing
during the period before your submission, and also to understand the feedback you receive.
Please refer back to these consistently during the assessment process.

A* A+, A, A- B+, B, B- C+, C, C- D+, D, D- E+, E, E-


Outstandin Excellent Very Good Good Acceptable Unsatisfact
g ory
Understand An A A critical A good Evidence of Evidence of
ing exceptional comprehen understand understand a coherent some
understand sive and ing of the ing of the understandi understandi
ing of the critical topic topic ng of the ng of key
topic understand key aspects aspects of
ing of the of the topic the topic
topic
Originality Strong A high level Independe Some Limited No
evidence of of nt thinking evidence of independen evidence of
originality independe and independe t thinking independen
and nt thinking developme nt thinking and t thinking
developme and nt of own and developme and
nt own developme ideas developme nt of own developme
independe nt of own nt of own ideas nt of own
nt ideas ideas ideas ideas
Ability to An ability An ability An ability An ability An ability to Some
develop an to develop to develop to develop to develop present a ability to
argument, a highly a complex a well a sufficiently present an
solution, complex argument, structured structured structured appropriate
evaluation argument, evaluation argument, argument argument, argument,
or evaluation or solution solution, or solution, solution or solution, or
explanation or solution evaluation evaluation explanation explanation
or or
explanatio explanatio
n n
Use of A highly A highly A critical An Evidence of Limited
literature critical, in- critical evaluation evaluation some evaluation
and depth evaluation of the of the evaluation of the
theories evaluation of the relevant relevant of the relevant
(where of the relevant literature literature relevant literature
appropriate relevant literature and and literature and
) literature theories theories theories

Page 2 of 3
and and and
theories theories theories
Use of Exceptional A high A high Competenc Use of the Limited use
methodolog ability to standard of standard of e in the use relevant of relevant
ies (Incl. use competenc competenc of methodolo methodolo
relevant methodolo e in the e in the use appropriat gies for gies
tools, gies for appropriate of e analysis and
literature) analysis use of appropriat methodolo synthesis to
and methodolo e gies for an
synthesis gies for methodolo analysis acceptable
analysis gies for and standard
and analysis synthesis
synthesis and
synthesis
Communica An An Ability to An ability Evidence of Little
tion exceptional excellent communica to effective evidence of
ability to ability to te clearly communica communica effective
communic communica and te clearly tion skills communica
ate te clearly concisely and tion
complex and effectively
topics concisely
clearly and
concisely

End of Paper

Page 3 of 3

You might also like