Staff Performance Evaluation-managerial Staff Under Pd

Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 19

STAFF PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

CHINA RAILWAY CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION LIMITED QATAR BRANCH

EMPLOYEE'S DETAILS
EMPLOYEE NAME Mourad Mouaissi ID NUMBER 29850400134
PROJECT DN071 ( P2) DEPARTMENT PR & Stakeholder
DESIGNATION PRO LINE MANAGER Radwan Khalil
Evaluation Starting Date 1-Jan-2024 Evaluation Ending Date 31-Dec-2024
.

EVALUATION DETAILS
QUANTITATIVE EVALUATION INDICATORS
QUARTERLY KEY TASKS DESCRIPTION Evaluation Criteria
( NOT less than 5 tasks, NO more than 10 tasks)
TOTAL PLANNED ACTUAL GAINED
SN NOTE:The staff's immediate superior should together with staff to outline the key tasks of NOTE:Try to quantitatively describe the score deduction SCORE SCORE
the next quarter for the staff, and allocate evaluation scores to each task based on its rules for this task.
importance. The total evaluation score for all key tasks should be 100 score.

1 Cooperating with the engineers responsible for the sites and facilitating their needs Each Delay deduct 0.5 point 20

2 Visit all residents concerned with the project to obtain their approval to remove encroachments Each Delay deduct 0.5 point 10
Pasting and inspecting stickers for houses (road works notice) in addition to stickers (excavation Each Delay deduct 0.5 point
3 works notice) 10
Sending text messages to all residents providing them with information about working hours
4 during the summer. Each Delay deduct 0.5 point 10
Cooperating with surveyors to collect information about residents' homes in terms of the level
5 and location of the sewage tanke Each Delay deduct 0.5 point 15
Collect information about homes under construction and communicate with the owner or
6 contractor Each Delay deduct 0.5 point 15
Communicate with all complainers to find out their problems and cooperate with the team to find Each Delay deduct 0.5 point
7 solutions for them 10

8 visit the site every day to check the site look and feel Each Delay deduct 0.5 point 10

10

A:QUANTITATIVE SUB TOTAL SCORE 100


QUALITATIVE EVALUATION INDICATORS
SCORE
SN CRITERIA
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 Job Knowledge & Skill
2 Work Planning, Scheduling
3 Work Work Efficiency
4 Productivity Quality of Output
5 Commitment Towards Duties
6 Extra Work Effort
7 Pro-activeness & Innovativeness
8 Work Work Cooperation & Coordination
9 Attitude Sense of Cost &Company Benefit
10 Work Courtesy & Respect
B:QUALITATIVE SUB TOTAL SCORE

OVERALL SCORE(A*0.8+B*0.2)
OVERALL SCORE INDICATION
EXCELLENT ( 90-100) GOOD ( 80-89)
ACCEPTABLE (70-79) NEED IMPROVEMENT ( 60-69)

DECLARATION AND APPROVAL


We hereby declare the veracity of this evaluation process was conducted as per the company policy and in fair manner.

Immediate Superior Department Manager PM/PD/GM Staff Confirmation


STAFF PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
CHINA RAILWAY CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION LIMITED QATAR BRANCH

EMPLOYEE'S DETAILS
EMPLOYEE NAME Tariq Masoud ID NUMBER 27840000086
PROJECT DN071 ( P2) DEPARTMENT PR & Stakeholder
DESIGNATION PRO LINE MANAGER Radwan Khalil
Evaluation Starting Date 1-Jan-2024 Evaluation Ending Date 31-Dec-2024
.

EVALUATION DETAILS
QUANTITATIVE EVALUATION INDICATORS
QUARTERLY KEY TASKS DESCRIPTION Evaluation Criteria
( NOT less than 5 tasks, NO more than 10 tasks)
TOTAL PLANNED ACTUAL GAINED
SN NOTE:The staff's immediate superior should together with staff to outline the key tasks of NOTE:Try to quantitatively describe the score deduction SCORE SCORE
the next quarter for the staff, and allocate evaluation scores to each task based on its rules for this task.
importance. The total evaluation score for all key tasks should be 100 score.

1 Cooperating with the engineers responsible for the sites and facilitating their needs Each Delay deduct 0.5 point 20

2 Visit all residents concerned with the project to obtain their approval to remove encroachments Each Delay deduct 0.5 point 10
Pasting and inspecting stickers for houses (road works notice) in addition to stickers (excavation Each Delay deduct 0.5 point
3 works notice) 10
Sending text messages to all residents providing them with information about working hours
4 during the summer. Each Delay deduct 0.5 point 10
Cooperating with surveyors to collect information about residents' homes in terms of the level
5 and location of the sewage tanke Each Delay deduct 0.5 point 15
Collect information about homes under construction and communicate with the owner or
6 contractor Each Delay deduct 0.5 point 15
Communicate with all complainers to find out their problems and cooperate with the team to find Each Delay deduct 0.5 point
7 solutions for them 10

8 visit the site every day to check the site look and feel Each Delay deduct 0.5 point 10

10

A:QUANTITATIVE SUB TOTAL SCORE 100


QUALITATIVE EVALUATION INDICATORS
SCORE
SN CRITERIA
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 Job Knowledge & Skill
2 Work Planning, Scheduling
3 Work Work Efficiency
4 Productivity Quality of Output
5 Commitment Towards Duties
6 Extra Work Effort
7 Pro-activeness & Innovativeness
8 Work Work Cooperation & Coordination
9 Attitude Sense of Cost &Company Benefit
10 Work Courtesy & Respect
B:QUALITATIVE SUB TOTAL SCORE

OVERALL SCORE(A*0.8+B*0.2)
OVERALL SCORE INDICATION
EXCELLENT ( 90-100) GOOD ( 80-89)
ACCEPTABLE (70-79) NEED IMPROVEMENT ( 60-69)

DECLARATION AND APPROVAL


We hereby declare the veracity of this evaluation process was conducted as per the company policy and in fair manner.

Immediate Superior Department Manager PM/PD/GM Staff Confirmation


STAFF PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
CHINA RAILWAY CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION LIMITED QATAR BRANCH

EMPLOYEE'S DETAILS
EMPLOYEE NAME Mohammed Abounahiah ID NUMBER 29499900272
PROJECT DN071 ( P2) DEPARTMENT PR & Stakeholder
DESIGNATION SR.PRO LINE MANAGER Radwan Khalil
Evaluation Starting Date 1-Jan-2024 Evaluation Ending Date 31-Dec-2024
.

EVALUATION DETAILS
QUANTITATIVE EVALUATION INDICATORS
QUARTERLY KEY TASKS DESCRIPTION Evaluation Criteria
( NOT less than 5 tasks, NO more than 10 tasks)
TOTAL PLANNED ACTUAL GAINED
SN NOTE:The staff's immediate superior should together with staff to outline the key tasks of NOTE:Try to quantitatively describe the score deduction SCORE SCORE
the next quarter for the staff, and allocate evaluation scores to each task based on its rules for this task.
importance. The total evaluation score for all key tasks should be 100 score.

1 Cooperating with the engineers responsible for the sites and facilitating their needs Each Delay deduct 0.5 point 20

2 Visit all residents concerned with the project to obtain their approval to remove encroachments Each Delay deduct 0.5 point 10
Pasting and inspecting stickers for houses (road works notice) in addition to stickers (excavation Each Delay deduct 0.5 point
3 works notice) 10
Sending text messages to all residents providing them with information about working hours
4 during the summer. Each Delay deduct 0.5 point 10
Cooperating with surveyors to collect information about residents' homes in terms of the level
5 and location of the sewage tanke Each Delay deduct 0.5 point 15
Collect information about homes under construction and communicate with the owner or
6 contractor Each Delay deduct 0.5 point 15
Communicate with all complainers to find out their problems and cooperate with the team to find Each Delay deduct 0.5 point
7 solutions for them 10

8 visit the site every day to check the site look and feel Each Delay deduct 0.5 point 10

10

A:QUANTITATIVE SUB TOTAL SCORE 100


QUALITATIVE EVALUATION INDICATORS
SCORE
SN CRITERIA
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 Job Knowledge & Skill
2 Work Planning, Scheduling
3 Work Work Efficiency
4 Productivity Quality of Output
5 Commitment Towards Duties
6 Extra Work Effort
7 Pro-activeness & Innovativeness
8 Work Work Cooperation & Coordination
9 Attitude Sense of Cost &Company Benefit
10 Work Courtesy & Respect
B:QUALITATIVE SUB TOTAL SCORE

OVERALL SCORE(A*0.8+B*0.2)
OVERALL SCORE INDICATION
EXCELLENT ( 90-100) GOOD ( 80-89)
ACCEPTABLE (70-79) NEED IMPROVEMENT ( 60-69)

DECLARATION AND APPROVAL


We hereby declare the veracity of this evaluation process was conducted as per the company policy and in fair manner.

Immediate Superior Department Manager PM/PD/GM Staff Confirmation


STAFF PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
CHINA RAILWAY CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION LIMITED QATAR BRANCH

EMPLOYEE'S DETAILS
EMPLOYEE NAME Radwan Khalil ID NUMBER 27940000157
PROJECT DN071 ( P2) DEPARTMENT PR & Stakeholder
DESIGNATION Public Relation Manager LINE MANAGER Abdelrahman Mostafa
Evaluation Starting Date 1-Jan-2024 Evaluation Ending Date 31-Dec-2024
.

EVALUATION DETAILS
QUANTITATIVE EVALUATION INDICATORS
QUARTERLY KEY TASKS DESCRIPTION Evaluation Criteria
( NOT less than 5 tasks, NO more than 10 tasks)
TOTAL PLANNED ACTUAL GAINED
SN NOTE:The staff's immediate superior should together with staff to outline the key tasks of NOTE:Try to quantitatively describe the score deduction SCORE SCORE
the next quarter for the staff, and allocate evaluation scores to each task based on its rules for this task.
importance. The total evaluation score for all key tasks should be 100 score.

Develop and maintain strong relationships with key stakeholders, including government officials, Positive feedback from stakeholders
1 industry partners, and community leaders, Increased stakeholder engagement and collaboration Successful partnership initiatives 20
Represent the company in stakeholder meetings, conferences, and events to effectively Successful negotiation and conflict resolution
2 communicate the organization's goals and interests. Positive reception and feedback from
stakeholders Measurable progress on stakeholder-related initiatives 15
Analyze stakeholder needs, concerns, and priorities, and develop strategic plans to address Effective implementation of stakeholder-centric solutions
3 them. Timely identification and mitigation of stakeholder issues Positive stakeholder satisfaction and alignment 20
Coordinate cross-functional teams to ensure seamless stakeholder engagement and project Improved internal collaboration and communication
4 delivery. Successful project execution and stakeholder satisfaction Positive feedback from team members 15
Monitor and report on stakeholder engagement activities, including communication, feedback, Timely identification of emerging stakeholder trends
5 and outcomes. Comprehensive and insightful reporting Data-driven recommendations for improvement 15
Proactively seek out new stakeholder engagement opportunities and explore potential Increased stakeholder diversity and reach
6 partnerships or collaborations. Identification and successful implementation of new stakeholder
initiatives Positive impact on the organization's reputation and influenc 15

10

A:QUANTITATIVE SUB TOTAL SCORE 100


QUALITATIVE EVALUATION INDICATORS
SCORE
SN CRITERIA
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 Job Knowledge & Skill
2 Work Planning, Scheduling
3 Work Work Efficiency
4 Productivity Quality of Output
5 Commitment Towards Duties
6 Extra Work Effort
7 Pro-activeness & Innovativeness
8 Work Work Cooperation & Coordination
9 Attitude Sense of Cost &Company Benefit
10 Work Courtesy & Respect
B:QUALITATIVE SUB TOTAL SCORE

OVERALL SCORE(A*0.8+B*0.2)
OVERALL SCORE INDICATION
EXCELLENT ( 90-100) GOOD ( 80-89)
ACCEPTABLE (70-79) NEED IMPROVEMENT ( 60-69)

DECLARATION AND APPROVAL


We hereby declare the veracity of this evaluation process was conducted as per the company policy and in fair manner.

Immediate Superior Department Manager PM/PD/GM Staff Confirmation


STAFF PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
CHINA RAILWAY CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION LIMITED QATAR BRANCH

EMPLOYEE'S DETAILS
EMPLOYEE NAME Salma Mohd Alkurdi ID NUMBER 29940000033
PROJECT DN071 ( P2) DEPARTMENT PR & Stakeholder
DESIGNATION PRO LINE MANAGER Abdelrahman Mostafa
Evaluation Starting Date 1-Jan-2024 Evaluation Ending Date 31-Dec-2024
.

EVALUATION DETAILS
QUANTITATIVE EVALUATION INDICATORS
QUARTERLY KEY TASKS DESCRIPTION Evaluation Criteria
( NOT less than 5 tasks, NO more than 10 tasks)
TOTAL PLANNED ACTUAL GAINED
SN NOTE:The staff's immediate superior should together with staff to outline the key tasks of NOTE:Try to quantitatively describe the score deduction SCORE SCORE
the next quarter for the staff, and allocate evaluation scores to each task based on its rules for this task.
importance. The total evaluation score for all key tasks should be 100 score.

Monitoring and adding daily site observations tracker to share it with the whole departments in
1 charge to be checked, recorded, and solved. Each delay deduct 0.5 10

2 Receiving all the reports of the Official/ Non-official complaints & Enquiries of Females. Each delay deduct 0.5 10
Communicating with all the residents (Females) to reach them for any type of issue that occur
3 and meet their requirements. Each delay deduct 0.5 10
Recording and editing all the lists of the Official/ Non-official complaints & Enquiries for record for
4 all the PR team. Each delay deduct 0.5 15
Updating the full tracker log of the official complaints and enquiries, and the non-official
5 complaints tracker log. Each delay deduct 0.5 15
6 Daily site visit PR full site review & attending all ASHGHAL PR meeting for information review. Each delay deduct 0.5 5
Installing house notification stickers & collecting all the required weekly photos of the site and
7 send them to the GEC, also preparing site and feel check list. Each delay deduct 0.5 10
Preparing and submitting monthly Key Performance Indicator (KPI) for the PR team and
8 recording their initiatives and efforts. Each delay deduct 0.5 10
Updating and sharing all the project zones completion dates and engineers working areas for the
9 PR team , and gate closure list. Each delay deduct 0.5 5
Writing and Preparing all the reports, presentations, lists, tools, and information requested to be
10 submitted from the PR team and communicating with all the departments to collect all the
necessary data and maintain the connection between us and the other teams.
Each delay deduct 0.5 10

A:QUANTITATIVE SUB TOTAL SCORE 100


QUALITATIVE EVALUATION INDICATORS
SCORE
SN CRITERIA
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 Job Knowledge & Skill
2 Work Planning, Scheduling
3 Work Work Efficiency
4 Productivity Quality of Output
5 Commitment Towards Duties
6 Extra Work Effort
7 Pro-activeness & Innovativeness
8 Work Work Cooperation & Coordination
9 Attitude Sense of Cost &Company Benefit
10 Work Courtesy & Respect
B:QUALITATIVE SUB TOTAL SCORE

OVERALL SCORE(A*0.8+B*0.2)
OVERALL SCORE INDICATION
EXCELLENT ( 90-100) GOOD ( 80-89)
ACCEPTABLE (70-79) NEED IMPROVEMENT ( 60-69)

DECLARATION AND APPROVAL


We hereby declare the veracity of this evaluation process was conducted as per the company policy and in fair manner.

Immediate Superior Department Manager PM/PD/GM Staff Confirmation


der
Mostafa

ACTUAL GAINED
SCORE

10
rmation
STAFF PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
CHINA RAILWAY CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION LIMITED QATAR BRANCH

EMPLOYEE'S DETAILS
EMPLOYEE NAME Zhang Shuang ID NUMBER 29615600208
PROJECT DN071 ( P2) DEPARTMENT Procurement
DESIGNATION Dy. Procurement Manager LINE MANAGER Mohammad Gyas
Evaluation Starting Date 1-Jan-2024 Evaluation Ending Date 31-Dec-2024
.

EVALUATION DETAILS
QUANTITATIVE EVALUATION INDICATORS
QUARTERLY KEY TASKS DESCRIPTION Evaluation Criteria
( NOT less than 5 tasks, NO more than 10 tasks)
TOTAL PLANNED ACTUAL GAINED
SN NOTE:The staff's immediate superior should together with staff to outline the key tasks of NOTE:Try to quantitatively describe the score deduction SCORE SCORE
the next quarter for the staff, and allocate evaluation scores to each task based on its rules for this task.
importance. The total evaluation score for all key tasks should be 100 score.

Each day delay shall be deducted as 1 point


1 Preparation of supply agreement, Subcontact agreement, Work Order for average work performance. 10

Preparation of procurement package with coordination with all the Each day delay shall be deducted as 1 point
2 department for permanment item for all average work performance. 10

3 Preparation and to finalize the subcontract according to company policy. Each day delay shall be deducted as 1 point
for all average work performance. 10
Each day delay shall be deducted as 1 point
4 Internal document for approval at head office. for all average work performance. 10
Each day delay shall be deducted as 1 point
5 Internal monthy report for head offices. for all average work performance. 10
Consistency is the key performance indicator
6 Coordniate with supplier and our other department for payment. in this to analyze 10
Consistency is the key performance indicator
7 Check the payment log & material log inventory. in this to analyze 10
Consistency is the key performance indicator
8 Co-ordination and Support for material delivery. in this to analyze 10
Consistency is the key performance indicator
9 Prepare variation for subcontract and supply agreement in this to analyze 10
Market research and company benefit to check for current condition of Consistency is the key performance indicator
10 the market. And to avoid legal issue. in this to analyze 10

A:QUANTITATIVE SUB TOTAL SCORE 100


QUALITATIVE EVALUATION INDICATORS
SCORE
SN CRITERIA
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 Job Knowledge & Skill
2 Work Planning, Scheduling
3 Work Work Efficiency
4 Productivity Quality of Output
5 Commitment Towards Duties
6 Extra Work Effort
7 Pro-activeness & Innovativeness
8 Work Work Cooperation & Coordination
9 Attitude Sense of Cost &Company Benefit
10 Work Courtesy & Respect
B:QUALITATIVE SUB TOTAL SCORE

OVERALL SCORE(A*0.8+B*0.2)
OVERALL SCORE INDICATION
EXCELLENT ( 90-100) GOOD ( 80-89)
ACCEPTABLE (70-79) NEED IMPROVEMENT ( 60-69)

DECLARATION AND APPROVAL


We hereby declare the veracity of this evaluation process was conducted as per the company policy and in fair manner.

Immediate Superior Department Manager PM/PD/GM Staff Confirmation


as

ACTUAL GAINED
SCORE

10
rmation
STAFF PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
CHINA RAILWAY CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION LIMITED QATAR BRANCH

EMPLOYEE'S DETAILS
EMPLOYEE NAME Ahmed Galaleldeen Mosallam Soliman ID NUMBER 28581803203
PROJECT DN071 ( P2) DEPARTMENT Technical & Engineering
DESIGNATION Technical Manager LINE MANAGER Abdelrahman Mostafa
Evaluation Starting Date 1-Jan-2024 Evaluation Ending Date 31-Dec-2024
.

EVALUATION DETAILS
QUANTITATIVE EVALUATION INDICATORS
QUARTERLY KEY TASKS DESCRIPTION Evaluation Criteria
( NOT less than 5 tasks, NO more than 10 tasks)
TOTAL PLANNED ACTUAL GAINED
SN NOTE:The staff's immediate superior should together with staff to outline the key tasks of NOTE:Try to quantitatively describe the score deduction SCORE SCORE
the next quarter for the staff, and allocate evaluation scores to each task based on its rules for this task.
importance. The total evaluation score for all key tasks should be 100 score.

1 Follow-up and coordination of the Engineering work Each delay deduct 1 point 7

2 Coordination with the GEC for the as-built & Shop drawings approval Each delay deduct 0.5 point 5
Review and confirm the as-built drawings, Shop drawings, design
3 calculations, material submission & prequalifications Each delay deduct 0.5 point 10

4 Coordination with the site team to solve the technical issues Each delay deduct 1 point 10
Follow-up and coordination owith the GEC for the Lean Construction
5 requirements Each delay deduct 1 point 8
Coordination with the client & the GEC for the resident complaints and
6 request Each delay deduct 1 point 15

7 Coordination with the client to solve technical issues Each delay deduct 1 point 15
Coordination with the Subcontractors/suppliers for the shop drawings,
8 mock-ups, material submittal approvals Each delay deduct 1 point 10

9 Preparing RFI's for the project issues Each delay deduct 1 point 5

Preparation of the procurement packages Each delay deduct 1 point 5

10 Prepare the technical letter to the GEC and the client Each delay deduct 1 point 10

A:QUANTITATIVE SUB TOTAL SCORE 100


QUALITATIVE EVALUATION INDICATORS
SCORE
SN CRITERIA
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 Job Knowledge & Skill
2 Work Planning, Scheduling
3 Work Work Efficiency
4 Productivity Quality of Output
5 Commitment Towards Duties
6 Extra Work Effort
7 Pro-activeness & Innovativeness
8 Work Work Cooperation & Coordination
9 Attitude Sense of Cost &Company Benefit
10 Work Courtesy & Respect
B:QUALITATIVE SUB TOTAL SCORE

OVERALL SCORE(A*0.8+B*0.2)
OVERALL SCORE INDICATION
EXCELLENT ( 90-100) GOOD ( 80-89)
ACCEPTABLE (70-79) NEED IMPROVEMENT ( 60-69)

DECLARATION AND APPROVAL


We hereby declare the veracity of this evaluation process was conducted as per the company policy and in fair manner.

Immediate Superior Department Manager PM/PD/GM Staff Confirmation


gineering
Mostafa

ACTUAL GAINED
SCORE

10
rmation
STAFF PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
CHINA RAILWAY CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION LIMITED QATAR BRANCH

EMPLOYEE'S DETAILS
EMPLOYEE NAME Li Wende ID NUMBER 29415600253
PROJECT CRCCQB - DN071 DEPARTMENT Planning
DESIGNATION Deputy PCD Manager LINE MANAGER Abdelrahman Mostafa
Evaluation Starting Date 2024.01.01 Evaluation Ending Date 2024.12.31

EVALUATION DETAILS
QUANTITATIVE EVALUATION INDICATORS
QUARTERLY KEY TASKS DESCRIPTION Evaluation Criteria
( NOT less than 5 tasks, NO more than 10 tasks)
TOTAL PLANNED ACTUAL GAINED
SN SCORE SCORE
NOTE:The staff's immediate superior should together with staff to outline the key tasks of NOTE:Try to quantitatively describe the score deduction
the next quarter for the staff, and allocate evaluation scores to each task based on its rules for this task.
importance. The total evaluation score for all key tasks should be 100 score.

If the update is not timely, 1-3 points will be


1 preparation and updating of project schedules deducted depending on the situation 20

If the progress data is incomplete or flawed, 1-2


2 Responsible for the statistics of project progress data points will be deducted depending on the 20
situation

If fail to give a timely warning, 1-3 points will be


3 Responsible for the early warning of project progress lag deducted depending on the situation 20

If the production rates are incomplete or flawed,


4 Responsible for project production rates and updates 1-2 points will be deducted depending on the 15
situation

Responsible for the preparation of internal reports (monthly analysis If the submission is not submitted on time or
5 report, PEP, etc.) there are defects, 0.5-1 points will be deducted 15
depending on the situation

Other support work, including but not limited to the preparation of bidding Failure to carry out or cooperate with support in a
6 schedules, video recording, etc timely manner will be deducted 1 to 2 points 10
each time, depending on the circumstances

A:QUANTITATIVE SUB TOTAL SCORE 100


QUALITATIVE EVALUATION INDICATORS
SCORE
SN CRITERIA
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 Job Knowledge & Skill
2 Work Planning, Scheduling
3 Work Work Efficiency
4 Productivity Quality of Output
5 Commitment Towards Duties
6 Extra Work Effort
7 Pro-activeness & Innovativeness
8 Work Work Cooperation & Coordination
9 Attitude Sense of Cost &Company Benefit
10 Work Courtesy & Respect
B:QUALITATIVE SUB TOTAL SCORE

OVERALL SCORE(A*0.8+B*0.2)
OVERALL SCORE INDICATION
EXCELLENT ( 90-100) GOOD ( 80-89)
ACCEPTABLE (70-79) NEED IMPROVEMENT ( 60-69)
DECLARATION AND APPROVAL
We hereby declare the veracity of this evaluation process was conducted as per the company policy and in fair manner.

Immediate Superior Department Manager PM/PD/GM Staff Confirmation


STAFF PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
CHINA RAILWAY CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION LIMITED QATAR BRANCH

EMPLOYEE'S DETAILS
EMPLOYEE NAME Jimmy Sumalbag Cabanada ID NUMBER 26660806502
PROJECT DN071 ( P2) DEPARTMENT QAQC
DESIGNATION QAQC Manager LINE MANAGER Abdelrahman Mostafa
Evaluation Starting Date 1-Jan-2024 Evaluation Ending Date31-Dec-2024
.

EVALUATION DETAILS
QUANTITATIVE EVALUATION INDICATORS
QUARTERLY KEY TASKS DESCRIPTION Evaluation Criteria
( NOT less than 5 tasks, NO more than 10 tasks)
TOTAL PLANNED ACTUAL GAINED
SN NOTE:The staff's immediate superior should together with staff to outline the key tasks NOTE:Try to quantitatively describe the score SCORE SCORE
of the next quarter for the staff, and allocate evaluation scores to each task based on its deduction rules for this task.
importance. The total evaluation score for all key tasks should be 100 score.

1 Updating all documents related to Quality Management System (QMS) Each document that late to update will
deduct 0.5 score 20
Face-to-face attendance for QSD, RPD, and WSP Project Audit from Failure to close NCR as per agreed
2 time to time and provide supporting documents. timeframe will deduct 1% each 20

To provide immediate dispositions to all the NCRs issued by QSD,


3 RPD, and WSP not exceeding 1 week time. Deduct 0.5 points per delayed response 15

Day to day coordination with WSP Resident Engineers to resolve INRs Failure to resolve the issue will deduct a
4 issues 0.5 score in each INR. 10

Conducting and Participating in the site Quality toolbox talks enables Failure to conduct will deduct 2% from
5 the site engineers and foremen to refresh the process and procedure, CRCC's Monthly KPI. 10
Attend weekly review meeting, PWA monthly progress meeting and Every Quality issue highlighted will deduct
6 subcontractor's site meeting. 0.5 points depending on the issue 5

Attending Quality site walks, 5S audit, Waste Walk and provide Failure to close each observation will
7 necessary action to issued observations. deduct 0.5 score 5

Continual internal QA/QC meetings with QA/QC staff and assist, Failure to conduct the meeting will deduct a
8 evaluate their progress and capability. Resolve the issues 0.5 score 5
Prepare/Review and sign before submissions of Monthly deliverables. deduct 0.5 score for any delayed
9 To response correspondence letter from WSP and from supplier & responses to deliverables linked to QA/QC 5
Subcon
Random site surviellance inspection with WSP. Every site surveillance
10 inspection will minimize the issuance of NCR and or Quality Failure to conduct will deduct 0.5 score 5
observation.

A:QUANTITATIVE SUB TOTAL SCORE 100


QUALITATIVE EVALUATION INDICATORS
SCORE
SN CRITERIA
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 Job Knowledge & Skill
2 Work Planning, Scheduling
3 Work Work Efficiency
4 Productivity Quality of Output
5 Commitment Towards Duties
6 Extra Work Effort
7 Pro-activeness & Innovativeness
8 Work Work Cooperation & Coordination
9 Attitude Sense of Cost &Company Benefit
10 Work Courtesy & Respect
B:QUALITATIVE SUB TOTAL SCORE

OVERALL SCORE(A*0.8+B*0.2)
OVERALL SCORE INDICATION
EXCELLENT ( 90-100) GOOD ( 80-89)
ACCEPTABLE (70-79) NEED IMPROVEMENT ( 60-69)

DECLARATION AND APPROVAL


We hereby declare the veracity of this evaluation process was conducted as per the company policy and in fair manner.

Immediate Superior Department Manager PM/PD/GM Staff Confirmation


STAFF PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
CHINA RAILWAY CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION LIMITED QATAR BRANCH

EMPLOYEE'S DETAILS
EMPLOYEE NAME Shafayet Jamil ID NUMBER 27605004760
PROJECT DN071 ( P2) DEPARTMENT OHSSE
DESIGNATION OHSS Manager LINE MANAGER Abdelrahman Mostafa
Evaluation Starting Date 1-Jan-2024 Evaluation Ending Date 31-Dec-2024
.

EVALUATION DETAILS
QUANTITATIVE EVALUATION INDICATORS
QUARTERLY KEY TASKS DESCRIPTION Evaluation Criteria
( NOT less than 5 tasks, NO more than 10 tasks)
TOTAL PLANNED ACTUAL GAINED
SN NOTE:The staff's immediate superior should together with staff to outline the key tasks of NOTE:Try to quantitatively describe the score deduction SCORE SCORE
the next quarter for the staff, and allocate evaluation scores to each task based on its rules for this task.
importance. The total evaluation score for all key tasks should be 100 score.

Updating and implementation of Health Safetty Securuty, ERP, Welfare, Delay submission and rejection will deduct 2.5
1 Heat Stress Manageegment plan points 20
Any rejection or resubmission will deduct 2
2 Reviewing MSRA, SOPs, and other Safety documents point 10
Conducting Safety Related Meetings with subcontractors and internal Faulure to conduct each meeting will reduce 1
3 department meetings points 10
Daily site monitoring to ensure acceptable performance by Safety Poor performance on the field will reduce 0.5
4 Officers points 5
Attending Safety meeting, UG Utilities committee meeting, progress Non-attendance of meeting will deduct 1
5 meeting and other meetings with GEC points 10
Conducting Safety inspection with management, other departments and Non-attendance in inspetcion will deduct 1
6 subcontractors points 10

7 Accident / Incident investigation and follow up to prevent recurrance Deduct 1 point for each incident 5
Attend Safety Inspection conducted by GEC, PWA RPD, QSD and Non-attendance of inspection will deduct 2
8 stakeholders points 10
Conduct Emergency drills, trainings, practical demonstration on regular Failure to conduct any event will deduct 2
9 intervals points 10
Attending to site critical issues and Co-ordinate with other departments
10 to ensure safety violations are controlled and not repeated Each violation will deduct 1 point 10

A:QUANTITATIVE SUB TOTAL SCORE 100


QUALITATIVE EVALUATION INDICATORS
SCORE
SN CRITERIA
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 Job Knowledge & Skill
2 Work Planning, Scheduling
3 Work Work Efficiency
4 Productivity Quality of Output
5 Commitment Towards Duties
6 Extra Work Effort
7 Pro-activeness & Innovativeness
8 Work Work Cooperation & Coordination
9 Attitude Sense of Cost &Company Benefit
10 Work Courtesy & Respect
B:QUALITATIVE SUB TOTAL SCORE

OVERALL SCORE(A*0.8+B*0.2)
OVERALL SCORE INDICATION
EXCELLENT ( 90-100) GOOD ( 80-89)
ACCEPTABLE (70-79) NEED IMPROVEMENT ( 60-69)

DECLARATION AND APPROVAL


We hereby declare the veracity of this evaluation process was conducted as per the company policy and in fair manner.

Immediate Superior Department Manager PM/PD/GM Staff Confirmation

You might also like