Group 5 - Chapter 1
Group 5 - Chapter 1
A Research Proposal
Presented to the Senior High School Department of
Don Bosco Academy of Pampanga, Inc.
By:
September 2024
Chapter 1
DOWSING COMBUSTION: HOUSEHOLD ALTERNATIVES FOR FIRE
2EXTINGUISHERS
Introduction
Fire safety has become one of the most urgent concerns globally, especially in the
context of household safety and disaster preparedness. A significant aspect of this is the
from escalating into catastrophic events. Despite advancements in fire safety technology,
many households still lack access to fire extinguishers due to their high cost and limited
availability. Statistics show that in the Philippines, approximately 45% of homes are not
equipped with fire extinguishers, particularly in low-income areas (Kurata et al., 2022)
and according to a recent study, the Philippines ranks among the most at-risk nations
globally when it comes to severe man-made fire disasters in urban settings (Kurata, et al.,
2022). The lack of affordable fire safety measures continues to pose a significant threat to
households, especially in low-income areas. In rural and urban poor communities, the
consequences.
Fire extinguishers are vital tools designed to combat small fires before they spread
uncontrollably. These devices operate by releasing specific agents that can suppress or
extinguish fires based on the fire classification. There are several types of fire
extinguishers, each filled with materials like water, foam, dry powder, or carbon dioxide,
depending on the nature of the fire they are meant to combat. For example, Class A fire
extinguishers are designed for materials like wood and paper, while Class B extinguishers
handle flammable liquids such as grease and oil. Despite the effectiveness of these tools
in fire suppression, the high cost of traditional extinguishers prevents many households
from purchasing them. According to a study by Mishra & Aithal (2022), the cost of fire
low-income households
The most concerning issue regarding household fires, particularly kitchen fires, is
the occurrence of grease fires. Grease fires, or Class F fires, are caused by cooking oils
that reach extreme temperatures and ignite, presenting a unique danger. Traditional fire
extinguishers, particularly water-based ones, can exacerbate these fires by causing oil to
splatter, thus spreading flames (Daouda et al., 2024). Specialized extinguishers, such as
those using Class F agents, are essential for effectively combating grease fires, yet many
households remain unaware of their existence (Maestro et al., 2024). This lack of
In recent years, the majority of fire safety studies are focused on standard fire
extinguishers and how well they work against different types of fires. It does indicate a
gap in the literature with respect to the experimental research that specifically
investigates household materials for Class F fires. To add to that there is a gap regarding
the use of other common household materials, such as soap, water, salt, in addition to
baking soda and vinegar, for fire extinguishing purposes. This gap is classified as a
Classic Literature Gap, which refers to areas that remain unexplored or underexplored in
While studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of baking soda and vinegar in
combining these materials with other household items, such as water, salt and soap . This
effective materials that might offer practical alternatives for fire extinguishing, especially
in resource-limited settings.
Thus, to address the gap in fire safety preparedness, researchers have explored the
use of common household materials—baking soda, vinegar, soap, salt, and water—as
substitutes for traditional fire extinguishers, particularly for grease fires. These materials
have unique chemical properties that can effectively suppress small fires. Dry powder
extinguishers, commonly used in fire safety, utilize chemical compositions to tackle fires
by absorbing heat, melting, and coating the fuel to prevent it from releasing flammable
vapors. This process simultaneously blocks oxygen access, addressing two components
of the fire triangle: heat and oxygen. Monoammonium phosphate is the most widely used
bicarbonate are also used, though less effective against wood and paper fires.
Baking soda, when heated, releases carbon dioxide, which suffocates flames by
displacing oxygen (Liu et al., 2024). Salt acts similarly, creating a barrier that prevents
oxygen from reaching the flames, making it particularly useful for grease fires (Raiford,
2024). While salt is effective, large quantities are needed for significant fire control,
limiting its practicality in large-scale fires. Vinegar, composed primarily of water and
containing a small amount of acetic acid, has fire-suppressing potential due to its water
content. Despite popular misconceptions, vinegar does not intensify fires; instead, it may
slow or extinguish them by cooling the flames and diluting heat sources (Raiford, 2024).
A mixture of vinegar and baking soda produces carbon dioxide, which can extinguish a
Soap and soapy water also exhibit some fire-extinguishing properties. Soap foam,
for example, can create a suppressive layer over flames, aiding in fire control, though this
method is limited to certain types of fires (Raiford, 2024). However, there are risks
associated with using soap in fires, as some liquid soap products can release carbon
enhance fire suppression capabilities, indicating that household items could be optimized
for better performance in emergency situations (Zhou et al., 2024; Zhang et al., 2024).
Despite their promise, the practical limitations and risks associated with using household
materials highlight the need for comprehensive testing in diverse fire scenarios to validate
The study will be conducted at ( NOT YET SURE), where controlled experiments
baking soda, vinegar, soap, water and salt, in extinguishing Class F (grease) fires. The
accuracy and reliability. Each experiment will be repeated multiple times to ensure
consistency in results, with safety protocols strictly observed throughout the process. The
data collected will be analyzed to determine which household materials are most effective
There is a pressing problem, according to the article in Sarao (2024), the Bureau
stated that "10,996 fire incidents were reported during the period—a larger number than
the 8,182 registered in the same period the previous year. As a result, from January to
June 10 of this year, there were 34.4 percent more fire incidents in the Philippines,
Leyte, four houses were reduced to ashes due to an unattended cooking fire that happened
due to falling asleep. No one was hurt, and the fire incident lasted for an hour; however, it
burned 4 houses down; it also led to casualties of PHP 1.7 million worth of damage. This
low-income and rural areas where such safety equipment is considered an unaffordable
luxury. When a fire breaks out, especially a grease fire in the kitchen, the absence of
practices, such as attempting to douse the flames with water in the grease fire, are
ineffective and dangerous, as water exacerbates the grease fire even more. The reliance
on ineffective methods underscores the need for accessible fire suppression alternatives.
By showcasing the lack of fire safety resources in many households, in addition to the
article (Tmt, 2016) that stated the findings of an April 2016 survey on fire hazards and
security, which indicated that "a concerning situation exists in Filipino households as
only 17% of them have installed fire protection devices, compared to 97% of commercial
structures that have installed them," this study aims to address the problem of fire risk in
Cooking is a frequent household activity that carries significant fire risks due to
the high temperatures involved. Between 2017 and 2021, cooking caused 158,400 home
fires annually in the U.S., representing 44% of all home fires. These incidents resulted in
4,150 civilian injuries (42% of home fire injuries) and 470 civilian deaths (18% of home
fire fatalities). Cooktops and ranges were responsible for 53% of these fires, contributing
to 88% of cooking fire deaths and 74% of injuries. Electric ranges were particularly
hazardous compared to gas ranges, with unattended cooking being the leading cause of
these fires. Although rare, clothing ignition accounted for 7% of cooking fire deaths
(McKelvey, 2023).
systems in households. Data from The Bureau of Fire Protection (BFP) revealed a
significant increase in fire incidents: 3,044 occurrences were reported between January 1
and March 1, 2024, compared to 2,424 during the same period in 2023. Open flame
cooking is a major contributor to these fires, raising the risk of unintentional ignitions and
making it harder to control flames. This cooking method often lacks sufficient
monitoring, especially in densely populated areas with limited fire protection resources.
The 2023 BFP report indicated a 21.1% rise in fire incidents nationwide, totaling 15,900
fires, which is particularly concerning in urban areas where fires can quickly escalate into
In the statistics of 2019, a survey on fire dangers and security found that just 17%
commercial buildings. This is an "alarming" state of affairs (Lazo, 2016). This alarmingly
low percentage underscores a critical deficiency in fire prevention measures across the
significantly exacerbates the risk and severity of fire incidents, especially in densely
populated urban areas. This gap in fire safety infrastructure not only heightens the
services, leading to more severe and widespread damage in the event of a fire.
Additionally, stated in the article, that fire extinguishers play a vital role in this
preventive strategy, offering a first line of defense against the spread of fire. That can
save lives and property by mitigating or putting out the small fires before this leads to a
worse situation or containing it until the department arrives. Their immediate availability
and effectiveness can significantly curb the impact of a fire, making them indispensable
Hence, the rationale of this study takes into account that the Philippines is a
tropical nation with frequent high temperatures and fire threats, fire safety is vitally
relevant. Fire danger is a continuous issue that needs to be addressed quickly and
effectively to stop damage and fatalities. Conventional fire extinguishers are readily
available and functional, although they are mainly found in high-risk areas of a fire, such
as offices, apartments, and schools. According to the survey on fire hazards and security
only 17% of them have installed fire protection devices, whereas commercial structures
have installed 97% of them” (Tmt, 2016). This gap underscores the urgent need for
affordable and easily accessible fire mitigation options, particularly for households, to
ensure that both people and property are protected. Promoting low-cost, easy-to-use fire
extinguishers and increasing fire safety education could bridge this gap, preventing
people, especially in underprivileged areas, if alternative materials that are more readily
available and cost-effective are used. Unlike modern fire extinguishers, which often rely
alternatives would reduce production costs and increase the accessibility of fire safety
equipment for homes and small businesses. This would greatly benefit resource-poor
household materials like baking soda, vinegar, salt, water, and soap, fire extinguishers
could become both environmentally friendly and aligned with Sustainable Development
Goal 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities. This approach also encourages the use of
This research can shape public safety campaigns and fire emergency guidelines
alternatives. Promoting these options could greatly help to reduce fire incidents and
fatalities, especially in areas where conventional fire safety equipment is often lacking.
materials—baking soda, vinegar, soap, and salt—in extinguishing Class F kitchen fires.
income and rural areas where conventional fire extinguishing equipment may be scarce or
unaffordable. This study aims to provide practical solutions that can be readily
implemented in settings with limited resources, ultimately improving safety and reducing
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
household materials—namely baking soda, vinegar, soap, water, and salt as a fire
extinguishing agent. Specifically, the study seeks to determine how this combination
performs in suppressing type F fires (kitchen fires). Understanding its effectiveness could
provide valuable insights into alternative, accessible fire-fighting methods and enhance
1. Can a mixture of baking soda, soap, salt, vinegar, and water effectively extinguish
2. What is the optimal ratio of baking soda, vinegar, soap, salt, and water for
3. Can this alternative method provide a reliable and cost-effective solution for fire
HYPOTHESIS
The mixture of baking soda, soap, salt, vinegar, and water could result in three possible
1. Effectively extinguish kitchen fires: The mixture may successfully suppress the
fire by smothering it or reducing the fire’s intensity. For example, baking soda
releases carbon dioxide when heated, which helps displace oxygen and put out
small flames.
2. Cause robust combustion: Instead of extinguishing the fire, the mixture could
potentially worsen the situation, especially if water is involved. Water can cause
hot oil to splatter and spread the fire, making the fire more intense.
3. Null (No significant effect): The mixture might not have a noticeable impact,
either due to the components not being effective enough or the quantities used not
being sufficient to extinguish the fire. This could result in the fire continuing to
burn or grow.
The significance of this study lies in its potential to provide a more affordable, eco-
friendly, and accessible alternative to traditional fire extinguishers, which may not be
readily available in many Philippine households. The findings of this research could
household ingredients, this study can empower individuals to manage minor fire incidents
organizations, such as local fire departments and disaster response teams, to incorporate
these alternative fire-fighting methods into their safety protocols and training programs.
Research Community: The findings of this study can contribute to the broader scientific
safety.
Future Researchers: This study can serve as a foundation for further investigations into
DEFINITION OF TERMS