0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views21 pages

Ch10 - Part 1

Uploaded by

Shahed Hossain
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views21 pages

Ch10 - Part 1

Uploaded by

Shahed Hossain
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 21

Chapter 10

Error Detection
and
Correction

Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 10.1
Note

Data can be corrupted


during transmission.

Some applications require that


errors be detected and corrected.

10.2
Note

In a single-bit error, only 1 bit in the data


unit has changed.

10.3
Figure 10.1 Single-bit error

10.4
Note

A burst error means that 2 or more bits


in the data unit have changed.

10.5
Figure 10.2 Burst error of length 8

10.6
Note

To detect or correct errors, we need to


send extra (redundant) bits with data.

10.7
Figure 10.3 The structure of encoder and decoder

10.8
10-2 BLOCK CODING

In block coding, we divide our message into blocks, each of k bits,


called datawords. We add r redundant bits to each block to make the
length n = k + r. The resulting n-bit blocks are called codewords.

Topics discussed in this section:


Error Detection
Error Correction
Hamming Distance
Minimum Hamming Distance
10.9
Figure 10.5 Datawords and codewords in block coding

10.10
Example 10.1

The 4B/5B block coding discussed in Chapter 4 is a good


example of this type of coding. In this coding scheme,
k = 4 and n = 5. As we saw, we have 2k = 16 datawords
and 2n = 32 codewords. We saw that 16 out of 32
codewords are used for message transfer and the rest are
either used for other purposes or unused.

10.11
Error Detection

• Enough redundancy is added to detect an error.

• The receiver knows an error occurred but does not


know which bit(s) is(are) in error.

• Has less overhead than error correction.

10.12
Figure 10.6 Process of error detection in block coding

10.13
Table 10.1 A code for error detection (Example 10.2)

10.14
Example 10.2

Let us assume that k = 2 and n = 3. Table 10.1 shows the list of datawords
and codewords. Later, we will see how to derive a codeword from a dataword.

Assume the sender encodes the dataword 01 as 011 and sends it to the receiver.

Consider the following cases:

1. The receiver receives 011. It is a valid codeword. The receiver extracts the
dataword 01 from it.
10.15
Example 10.2 (continued)

2. The codeword is corrupted during transmission, and


111 is received. This is not a valid codeword and is
discarded.

3. The codeword is corrupted during transmission, and


000 is received. This is a valid codeword. The receiver
incorrectly extracts the dataword 00.
Two corrupted bits have made the error undetectable.

10.16
Note

An error-detecting code can detect


only the types of errors for which it is
designed; other types of errors may
remain undetected.

10.17
Figure 10.7 Structure of encoder and decoder in error correction

10.18
Example 10.3

Let us add more redundant bits to Example 10.2 to see if the receiver can
correct an error without knowing what was actually sent. We add 3
redundant bits to the 2-bit dataword to make 5-bit codewords. Table 10.2
shows the datawords and codewords.

Assume the dataword is 01. The sender creates the codeword 01011. The
codeword is corrupted during transmission, and 01001 is received. First,
the receiver finds that the received codeword is not in the table. This
means an error has occurred. The receiver, assuming that there is only 1
bit corrupted, uses the following strategy to guess the correct dataword.

10.19
Example 10.3 (continued)

1. Comparing the received codeword with the first codeword in the table (01001
versus 00000), the receiver decides that the first codeword is not the one that
was sent because there are two different bits.

2. By the same reasoning, the original codeword cannot be the third or fourth
one in the table. (three different bits, four different bits)

3. The original codeword must be the second one in the table because this is the
only one that differs from the received codeword by 1 bit. The receiver
replaces 01001 with 01011 and consults the table to find the dataword 01.
10.20
Table 10.2 A code for error correction (Example 10.3)

10.21

You might also like